03.11.2014 Views

Curator's essay - City Gallery Wellington

Curator's essay - City Gallery Wellington

Curator's essay - City Gallery Wellington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Campbell Kneale:<br />

201012.<br />

20 Oct. – 9 Dec.<br />

Campbell Kneale<br />

Our Love Will Destroy the World<br />

Photo: Bryan Spencer, 2011<br />

Courtesy of the artist


Hirschfeld <strong>Gallery</strong><br />

20 Oct. – 9 Dec. 2012<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong> <strong>Wellington</strong><br />

Te Whare Toi<br />

Open Daily 10am–5pm<br />

Free Entry<br />

The Hirschfeld <strong>Gallery</strong> is<br />

dedicated to exhibiting work<br />

by <strong>Wellington</strong>-based artists<br />

and designers.<br />

LH: I recently read a quote that reminded me of your<br />

work: ‘it is in the opposite of capture and containment,<br />

namely discharge and leakage, that we discover the life<br />

of things.’ I feel like this quite accurately reflects your<br />

own approach to making – as a compulsion and as<br />

CK: Here’s something to run by you by way of an evolving<br />

concept … Firstly, I think the viewer should make the<br />

links between the sound aspect and the visual aspect.<br />

Although the idea that the music is somehow linked to<br />

painting has always formed a question in my mind, I’ve<br />

never actually attempted to link the two. People seem<br />

to see a link and that’s nice. Being on the ‘inside’ of both<br />

these practices, I don’t see that link so easily. Funny,<br />

perhaps we let people find what they will.<br />

The text that follows is dedicated to the gradual<br />

evolution of this work, traced through excerpts from<br />

on-going email conversations between Campbell Kneale<br />

and curator Lily Hacking.<br />

Usually operating within their own distinct terms of<br />

reference, this exhibition is to some extent an invitation<br />

to encounter Kneale’s unique visual and sound practices<br />

in a way that is not usually possible outside his own<br />

reclusive work environment. Consequently, 201012 is<br />

less about a finite outcome and more about an artist<br />

grappling with his own creative processes in a particular<br />

time and place. This exhibition is full of the possibility<br />

for encounter and transformation; the work equally<br />

extending the prospect of obliteration or revelation;<br />

despair or elation.<br />

This exhibition focuses on one artist’s dynamic<br />

approach to making, with Campbell Kneale bringing<br />

together his painting and sound practices for the<br />

first time in a gallery context.<br />

Campbell<br />

Kneale:<br />

201012<br />

Campbell Kneale<br />

Destroyed Painting 001 (Giza), 2012<br />

oil and acrylic on canvas<br />

915mm x 1220mm<br />

Courtesy of the artist<br />

something that is constantly changing as you yourself<br />

are changing.<br />

CK: Wow … That’s beautiful. I love it. Yeah. I think the<br />

evolution of the work has more to do with the increasing<br />

richness that is found inside the work itself rather than<br />

any conscious attempt to grapple with ideas in the work<br />

from the outside. I don’t really grapple with ideas in<br />

painting or music … I grapple with them in real life. My art<br />

practices are not about ideas – they are an affirmation<br />

of my continued existence and my (inexplicable) desire<br />

to make.<br />

To be honest I don’t know why I make the work other<br />

than pure, unadulterated, compulsion. Perhaps this is the<br />

same reason anybody ever made art? The connections<br />

I make to various themes are usually fleeting, adding to<br />

a raft of ideas and fascinations that I hold that wax and<br />

wane with time. You can probably see from our on-going<br />

email conversations that the meanings and themes<br />

in the work are very fluid and constantly revealing<br />

themselves in real time.<br />

LH: What about the title of the show? We’ve talked about<br />

a few options but the last one simply made reference to<br />

the date of the opening.<br />

CK: Over time I have found the work capable of<br />

containing a pretty diverse range of fascinations and<br />

experiences … forest fires, heavy metal, economic<br />

and environmental collapse, cosmological emptiness,<br />

silence, noise, suburban decay, religious epiphany, high<br />

school teaching … the work has always been about<br />

these things, it’s just that it has taken key moments<br />

or experiences to realise it. But the time and place is<br />

perhaps the true nature of the work. So just like the<br />

paintings are titled with a date and time of their making,<br />

it seems entirely appropriate that this show should be<br />

titled with the opening date.<br />

Bond Street<br />

Central<br />

Library<br />

Harris Street<br />

<strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>Gallery</strong><br />

Civic Square<br />

P<br />

<strong>Wellington</strong> Festival<br />

& Convention Centre<br />

Wakefield Street<br />

Town<br />

Hall<br />

<strong>City</strong> to Sea Bridge<br />

Capital E<br />

Michael<br />

Fowler<br />

Centre<br />

Lagoon<br />

P<br />

Campbell Kneale:<br />

201012<br />

Artist talk<br />

27 Oct. 2pm<br />

Hirschfeld <strong>Gallery</strong>,<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong><br />

Free entry<br />

Campbell Kneale<br />

Destroyed Painting 004 (Taita), 2012<br />

oil and acrylic on canvas<br />

915mm x 1220mm<br />

Courtesy of the artist<br />

CK: Anything that resembles a sculptural approach<br />

toward the sound (like amps, speakers, electronic music<br />

gear etc) is only going to give people an excuse to turn<br />

their backs on the painting. There should be nothing<br />

of interest to look at – that part of it is not a ‘looking’<br />

experience. I feel that the sound component needs to<br />

‘match’ the painting’s level of intensity, projecting out<br />

into the room as far as it needs to go in order to create<br />

a similar of level of energy and meet the viewer of the<br />

LH: How will the sound component be presented in<br />

the space? I know that in your exhibition HUMDRUM<br />

at Enjoy Public Art <strong>Gallery</strong> (2005) you had speakers<br />

stacked in the gallery but how do you imagine the sound<br />

will function here? I suppose it depends on the extent<br />

to which you want the sound to function as a physical/<br />

visual component of the work?<br />

CK: Well, being ‘present’ is important to me. It’s almost<br />

code language for being fully alive and fully aware. The<br />

performance will be real and finite and if you see it you<br />

hopefully get ‘more’ from the whole exhibition or at<br />

least have an angle on things that not everybody gets.<br />

What I thought would be nice would be to start the<br />

sound component in the gallery just before the<br />

live performance ends so that when I’m done, the prerecorded<br />

soundtrack to the show will emerge out of<br />

the debris …<br />

LH: And how are you feeling about potentially integrating<br />

a live component into the work? This definitely seems<br />

like it will lend itself to this idea of temporality … but the<br />

performance will also kind of hover over the work, at<br />

least for those who saw or were even just aware of it<br />

taking place.<br />

Cover image<br />

Campbell Kneale<br />

201012, 2012<br />

oil and acrylic<br />

dimensions variable<br />

Courtesy the artist<br />

P<br />

Cuba Street<br />

Open Daily 10am–5pm<br />

Free Entry<br />

www.citygallery.org.nz<br />

Civic Square, PO Box 2199. <strong>Wellington</strong>, NZ.<br />

Phone: 64 4 801 3021<br />

Email: citygallery@wmt.org.nz<br />

Join the conversations on our Facebook<br />

page and on Twitter @<strong>City</strong><strong>Gallery</strong>Wgtn.<br />

Some of the works on display at <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>Gallery</strong> <strong>Wellington</strong> may contain elements<br />

that may be challenging for younger<br />

viewers. Parental guidance is advised.<br />

P<br />

1. Tim Ingold, Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a<br />

world of materials (working paper #15), Manchester: University of<br />

Manchester , 2010, p.8 http://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk<br />

Lily Hacking<br />

Hirschfeld <strong>Gallery</strong> Curator<br />

CK: I live in Featherston without television, radio, and<br />

if I want to read the newspaper I have to go and buy<br />

a coffee from the cafe at the end of the street. I am<br />

deeply suspect of the internet and its unquestioned<br />

and indispensable status in contemporary society.<br />

‘New media’ has proved profoundly disappointing to<br />

me. I hate most ‘proper’ bands … my performances have<br />

been euphemistically described as being “thoroughly<br />

unnerving in their generosity” which I think is wonderful.<br />

Nothing is held back, regardless of how many (or few)<br />

people are in attendance. In this sense what I do has<br />

never sought to be ‘audience-centric’ but is more like a<br />

snapshot of myself at a particular stage of a lifetime’s<br />

work. With this in mind, I feel like the show should be<br />

focused around the ‘simplest possible gesture,’ like my<br />

work has always been.<br />

LH: The corner location sits well with me – I imagine<br />

it will draw out more of that slight sense of wary<br />

antagonism between these practices. Initially the two<br />

continuously looping tracks will almost be engaged in<br />

a kind of conversation, but as they gradually become<br />

more and more out of sync the lines of communication/<br />

cohesion will start to disintegrate and what emerges will<br />

be something else entirely; something that is even less<br />

cohesive/concrete …<br />

I’d like to somehow encourage each individual viewer<br />

to make their own connections between the painting<br />

and the sound that supports it. I like the idea of new<br />

pieces of music being formed from the overlaps and<br />

deviations that result from out-of-sync sound sources.<br />

This is so analogue and ‘wrong’ in a world where<br />

everything can be synced to the most infinitesimal<br />

degree. Gradually, over a number of days, the building<br />

blocks of sound will shuffle in and out of alignment with<br />

each other, fracturing compositions into a bunch of new<br />

combinations and unique sound pictures. I think the<br />

sound source needs to be removed completely from the<br />

initial field of vision … perhaps in the opposite corner?<br />

visual work. If it was me, I would like to be taken to a new<br />

level of seeing by the added energy of the sound which<br />

encourages a kind of immersion experience without<br />

the sound dominating. I feel like the painting is so<br />

much more fragile and could easily be drowned out<br />

or bullied into a secondary role by a thoughtless misuse<br />

of overpowering sound.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!