post trial brief - AboutForsyth.com

were filed one year apart, both represent that they are original versions with no revisions. Both
represent that they were reviewed, signed off and approved within just a few days of being submitted.
Together, they make conflicting representations as to the use of the Common Area, so that the
developers and the County could show to various government entities whatever picture they wanted to
present at in any given circumstance.
14.
Plaintiffs Exhibit 43 and Defendants' Exhibit 1 both show that the entire Ivyshaw Landing
subdivision (18 Lots) has responsibility for operation and maintenance of the installed Community
Septic System. However, in contravention of the intent of the County Commissioners, the Ivyshaw
Landing Covenants have been unilaterally modified by the subdivision developers to fraudulently
remove from responsibility of maintenance those lot owners who have individual septic systems
installed.
15.
Defendants' have incurred expenses on behalf of all of the homeowners in the subdivision
which the Plaintiffs have refused to acknowledge because of their stated desire to ignore the problems
of the subdivision, for their own personal benefit. Those expenses include:
A. Rindt-McDuff Associates, engineering:
7/6/2007 $2,500.00
10/16/2007 $210.53
3/10/2010 $5,552.74
5/14/2012 $780.00
Total: $9,043.27
B. Mill Creek Environmental Services:
11/9/2012 $1,176.00
C. Total Surveying, in support of RMA investigation:
Page 7