05.11.2014 Views

2008 ANNUAL REPORT - National Lawyers Guild

2008 ANNUAL REPORT - National Lawyers Guild

2008 ANNUAL REPORT - National Lawyers Guild

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mass Defense<br />

Individuals and organizations trust and rely<br />

on the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Lawyers</strong> <strong>Guild</strong> to monitor<br />

large assemblies and smaller gatherings to<br />

ensure that infringements of First Amendment<br />

liberties do not go unchallenged. Our<br />

unique legal observer program sends trained<br />

observers to monitor law enforcement at rallies<br />

and marches in an effort to create a safe atmosphere<br />

for people to express their political views.<br />

In addition, <strong>Guild</strong> members frequently take the<br />

lead in representing those arrested and mounting<br />

legal challenges to unconstitutional law<br />

enforcement policies.<br />

Sit-in at Des Moines<br />

In a case that attracted national attention, <strong>Guild</strong><br />

member Sally Frank represented three of five<br />

defendants charged with trespass for a sit-in at<br />

Senator Grassley’s office in February 2007 as<br />

part of a campaign to protest the war in Iraq.<br />

In July 2007, a jury in Des Moines acquitted<br />

the five of trespass. On May 21, <strong>2008</strong> a judge<br />

dismissed charges of obstructing a federal office<br />

that had also been filed against the activists in<br />

federal court, finding them not guilty despite<br />

their admission that they had refused an order<br />

by a U.S. Department of Homeland Security<br />

officer to leave the office. The five argued that<br />

they had a First Amendment right to have their<br />

grievances heard by the Senator, and that he<br />

had refused to hear it. A local newspaper noted<br />

that the verdict suggested that the jurors agreed<br />

that the peace and justice activists’ freedom of<br />

speech, right to assemble, and right to have<br />

their grievances heard by their elected representative<br />

had been abridged by their arrest and<br />

removal from Senator Grassley’s office. The notguilty<br />

verdict, the first following several trespassing<br />

convictions over recent years by members<br />

of the group, was considered a victory of mass<br />

proportions.<br />

Upholding Public Assembly in Florida<br />

On May 18, 2007 the <strong>Guild</strong> settled a lawsuit<br />

challenging parade and public assembly laws in<br />

Fort Lauderdale. The U.S. District Court approved<br />

a settlement agreement which prohibits<br />

the City from enforcing ordinances allowing<br />

officials to restrict political demonstrations on<br />

public sidewalks and streets. The laws included<br />

an exemption allowing “bona-fide religious<br />

sects or organizations,” but not political groups,<br />

to freely assemble and had no time limitation<br />

on processing permits for parades and assemblies.<br />

They also granted unlawful discretion<br />

to government officials to deny permits based<br />

on disagreement with the views expressed, and<br />

unreasonably regulated the items that could be<br />

used to convey a political message. <strong>Guild</strong> members<br />

Carol Sobel, Robert Ross, Mara Shlackman<br />

and Andrea Costello worked with lawyers from<br />

Southern Legal Counsel and with the ACLU of<br />

Florida.<br />

Changing Law Enforcement Policy<br />

On May 10, 2007, the <strong>Guild</strong> and attorneys<br />

from the Mexican American Legal Defense and<br />

Educational Fund (MALDEF), filed a class action<br />

lawsuit in federal court in Los Angeles on<br />

behalf of the community groups who organized<br />

a May Day immigrants’ rights rally at MacArthur<br />

Park. The event, held in the city’s heavily<br />

Latino immigrant community, was disrupted<br />

by the Los Angeles Police Department when<br />

riot-gear clad officers swept through without<br />

warning and ordered everyone to leave the park.<br />

To date, videos of the rally and police action<br />

have failed to substantiate the police claims of<br />

provocation for the massive and brutal police<br />

response. The suit seeks changes in how the Los<br />

Angeles Police Department responds to demonstrations,<br />

as well as damages for all of the peaceful<br />

participants in the rally who were brutalized<br />

by the police and chased from the park.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!