2008 ANNUAL REPORT - National Lawyers Guild
2008 ANNUAL REPORT - National Lawyers Guild
2008 ANNUAL REPORT - National Lawyers Guild
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mass Defense<br />
Individuals and organizations trust and rely<br />
on the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Lawyers</strong> <strong>Guild</strong> to monitor<br />
large assemblies and smaller gatherings to<br />
ensure that infringements of First Amendment<br />
liberties do not go unchallenged. Our<br />
unique legal observer program sends trained<br />
observers to monitor law enforcement at rallies<br />
and marches in an effort to create a safe atmosphere<br />
for people to express their political views.<br />
In addition, <strong>Guild</strong> members frequently take the<br />
lead in representing those arrested and mounting<br />
legal challenges to unconstitutional law<br />
enforcement policies.<br />
Sit-in at Des Moines<br />
In a case that attracted national attention, <strong>Guild</strong><br />
member Sally Frank represented three of five<br />
defendants charged with trespass for a sit-in at<br />
Senator Grassley’s office in February 2007 as<br />
part of a campaign to protest the war in Iraq.<br />
In July 2007, a jury in Des Moines acquitted<br />
the five of trespass. On May 21, <strong>2008</strong> a judge<br />
dismissed charges of obstructing a federal office<br />
that had also been filed against the activists in<br />
federal court, finding them not guilty despite<br />
their admission that they had refused an order<br />
by a U.S. Department of Homeland Security<br />
officer to leave the office. The five argued that<br />
they had a First Amendment right to have their<br />
grievances heard by the Senator, and that he<br />
had refused to hear it. A local newspaper noted<br />
that the verdict suggested that the jurors agreed<br />
that the peace and justice activists’ freedom of<br />
speech, right to assemble, and right to have<br />
their grievances heard by their elected representative<br />
had been abridged by their arrest and<br />
removal from Senator Grassley’s office. The notguilty<br />
verdict, the first following several trespassing<br />
convictions over recent years by members<br />
of the group, was considered a victory of mass<br />
proportions.<br />
Upholding Public Assembly in Florida<br />
On May 18, 2007 the <strong>Guild</strong> settled a lawsuit<br />
challenging parade and public assembly laws in<br />
Fort Lauderdale. The U.S. District Court approved<br />
a settlement agreement which prohibits<br />
the City from enforcing ordinances allowing<br />
officials to restrict political demonstrations on<br />
public sidewalks and streets. The laws included<br />
an exemption allowing “bona-fide religious<br />
sects or organizations,” but not political groups,<br />
to freely assemble and had no time limitation<br />
on processing permits for parades and assemblies.<br />
They also granted unlawful discretion<br />
to government officials to deny permits based<br />
on disagreement with the views expressed, and<br />
unreasonably regulated the items that could be<br />
used to convey a political message. <strong>Guild</strong> members<br />
Carol Sobel, Robert Ross, Mara Shlackman<br />
and Andrea Costello worked with lawyers from<br />
Southern Legal Counsel and with the ACLU of<br />
Florida.<br />
Changing Law Enforcement Policy<br />
On May 10, 2007, the <strong>Guild</strong> and attorneys<br />
from the Mexican American Legal Defense and<br />
Educational Fund (MALDEF), filed a class action<br />
lawsuit in federal court in Los Angeles on<br />
behalf of the community groups who organized<br />
a May Day immigrants’ rights rally at MacArthur<br />
Park. The event, held in the city’s heavily<br />
Latino immigrant community, was disrupted<br />
by the Los Angeles Police Department when<br />
riot-gear clad officers swept through without<br />
warning and ordered everyone to leave the park.<br />
To date, videos of the rally and police action<br />
have failed to substantiate the police claims of<br />
provocation for the massive and brutal police<br />
response. The suit seeks changes in how the Los<br />
Angeles Police Department responds to demonstrations,<br />
as well as damages for all of the peaceful<br />
participants in the rally who were brutalized<br />
by the police and chased from the park.