05.11.2014 Views

Psychological Science in the Public Interest - Williams College

Psychological Science in the Public Interest - Williams College

Psychological Science in the Public Interest - Williams College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Psychology of Confessions<br />

Hilgendorf, E.L., & Irv<strong>in</strong>g, M. (1981). A decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g model of<br />

confessions. In M. Lloyd-Bostock (Ed.), Psychology <strong>in</strong> legal<br />

contexts: Applications and limitations (pp. 67–84). London:<br />

MacMillan.<br />

Hill, M.D. (2003). Identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> source of critical details <strong>in</strong> confessions.<br />

Forensic L<strong>in</strong>guistics, 10, 23–61.<br />

Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S.-A. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual<br />

offenders’ experiences of police <strong>in</strong>terviews and <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

to admit and deny crimes. Behavioral <strong>Science</strong>s and <strong>the</strong> Law, 20,<br />

31–45.<br />

Holmes, W. (2003). Crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>terrogation: A modern format for <strong>in</strong>terrogat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

crim<strong>in</strong>al suspects based on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual approach.<br />

Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, IL: Thomas.<br />

Home Office. (1985). Police and Crim<strong>in</strong>al Evidence Act of 1984.<br />

London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.<br />

Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., & Josephs, S. (2003). Individual<br />

differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong> and Kiechel (1996). Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 1–18.<br />

Huff, C.R., Rattner, A., & Sagar<strong>in</strong>, E. (1986). Guilty until proven<br />

<strong>in</strong>nocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Crime and<br />

Del<strong>in</strong>quency, 32, 518–544.<br />

Inbau, F.E., Reid, J.E., Buckley, J.P., & Jayne, B.C. (2001). Crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />

<strong>in</strong>terrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Gai<strong>the</strong>rsberg, MD: Aspen.<br />

Innocence Project. (2001). [Home page]. Retrieved March 11, 2005,<br />

from http://www.<strong>in</strong>nocenceproject.org/<br />

Irv<strong>in</strong>g, B. (1980). Police <strong>in</strong>terrogation: A case study of current practice<br />

(Royal Commission on Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure Research Study No.<br />

2). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.<br />

Irv<strong>in</strong>g, B., & Hilgendorf, L. (1980). Police <strong>in</strong>terrogation: The<br />

psychological approach (Royal Commission on Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure<br />

Research Study No. 1). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery<br />

Office.<br />

Jayne, B.C. (1986). The psychological pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>terrogation.<br />

In F. Inbau, J. Reid, & J. Buckley (Eds.), Crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>terrogation<br />

and confessions (3rd ed., pp. 327–347). Baltimore:<br />

<strong>Williams</strong> & Wilk<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Johnson, M.B. (2003). The <strong>in</strong>terrogation of Michael Crowe: A film<br />

review focused on education and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. American Journal of<br />

Forensic Psychology, 21, 71–79.<br />

Jones, E.E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.<br />

Kamisar, Y. (1995). On <strong>the</strong> ‘‘fruits’’ of Miranda violations, coerced<br />

confessions and compelled testimony. Michigan Law Review, 93,<br />

929–1010.<br />

Kamisar, Y., LaFave, W.R., Israel, J.H., & K<strong>in</strong>g, N.J. (2003). Modern<br />

crim<strong>in</strong>al procedure (10th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Karlsen, C.F. (1989). The devil <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> shape of a woman: Witchcraft <strong>in</strong><br />

colonial New England. New York: V<strong>in</strong>tage.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M. (1997a). False memories aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> self. <strong>Psychological</strong><br />

Inquiry, 8, 300–302.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M. (1997b). The psychology of confession evidence. American<br />

Psychologist, 52, 221–233.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M. (1998). More on <strong>the</strong> psychology of false confessions.<br />

American Psychologist, 53, 320–321.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M. (2002, November 1). False confessions and <strong>the</strong> jogger<br />

case. New York Times, p. A31.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M. (2004a). True or false: ‘‘I’d know a false confession if I<br />

saw one.’’ In P. Granhag & L. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection<br />

<strong>in</strong> forensic contexts (pp. 172–194). Cambridge, England:<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M. (2004b, April 26). Videotape police <strong>in</strong>terrogations. The<br />

Boston Globe, p. A13.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M. (2005). On <strong>the</strong> psychology of confessions: Does <strong>in</strong>nocence<br />

put <strong>in</strong>nocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M. (<strong>in</strong> press). Coerced-<strong>in</strong>ternalized false confessions. In M.<br />

Toglia, R. L<strong>in</strong>dsay, D. Ross, & J. Read (Eds.), Handbook of<br />

eyewitness psychology: Vol. 1. Memory for events. Mahwah, NJ:<br />

Erlbaum.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., & Fong, C.T. (1999). ‘‘I’m <strong>in</strong>nocent!’’ Effects of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

on judgments of truth and deception <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terrogation room.<br />

Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499–516.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., Goldste<strong>in</strong>, C.J., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral<br />

confirmation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terrogation room: On <strong>the</strong> dangers of presum<strong>in</strong>g<br />

guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187–203.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., & Kiechel, K.L. (1996). The social psychology of false<br />

confessions: Compliance, <strong>in</strong>ternalization, and confabulation.<br />

<strong>Psychological</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, 7, 125–128.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., & McNall, K. (1991). Police <strong>in</strong>terrogations and confessions:<br />

Communicat<strong>in</strong>g promises and threats by pragmatic<br />

implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 233–251.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., Meissner, C.A., & Norwick, R.J. (2005). ‘‘I’d know a<br />

false confession if I saw one’’: A comparative study of college<br />

students and police <strong>in</strong>vestigators. Law and Human Behavior, 29,<br />

211–227.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., & Neumann, K. (1997). On <strong>the</strong> power of confession<br />

evidence: An experimental test of <strong>the</strong> ‘‘fundamental difference’’<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 469–484.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., & Norwick, R.J. (2004). Why suspects waive <strong>the</strong>ir Miranda<br />

rights: The power of <strong>in</strong>nocence. Law and Human Behavior,<br />

28, 211–221.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and <strong>the</strong> jury:<br />

An experimental test of <strong>the</strong> ‘‘harmless error’’ rule. Law and<br />

Human Behavior, 21, 27–46.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock<br />

juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133–<br />

146.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1981). Coerced confessions, judicial<br />

<strong>in</strong>struction, and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied<br />

Social Psychology, 11, 489–506.<br />

Kass<strong>in</strong>, S.M., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1985). Confession evidence.<br />

In S.M. Kass<strong>in</strong> & L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of<br />

evidence and trial procedure (pp. 67–94). Beverly Hills, CA:<br />

Sage.<br />

Klaver, J., Gordon, R.V., & Lee, Z. (2003, July). Differential effects of<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imization and maximization <strong>in</strong>terrogation techniques and <strong>the</strong><br />

role of plausibility <strong>in</strong> an experimental false confession paradigm.<br />

Paper presented at <strong>the</strong> International and Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary Psychology<br />

& Law Conference, Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh, Scotland.<br />

Koehnken, G. (1987). Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g police officers to detect deceptive<br />

eyewitness statements: Does it work? Social Behavior, 2, 1–17.<br />

Kotlowitz, A. (1999, February 8). The unprotected. The New Yorker,<br />

pp. 42–53.<br />

Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael et al., 526 U.S.137 (1999).<br />

La Barre, W. (1964). Confession as cathartic <strong>the</strong>rapy <strong>in</strong> American<br />

Indian tribes. In A. Kiev (Ed.), Magic, faith, and heal<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Studies <strong>in</strong> primitive psychiatry today (pp. 36–49). New York: Free<br />

Press.<br />

Landers, P. (2000, October 6). A false confession jailed Mr. Yakushiji;<br />

<strong>the</strong>n fate <strong>in</strong>tervened. The Wall Street Journal, pp. A1, A8–A9.<br />

Lassiter, G.D. (Ed.). (2004). Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment.<br />

New York: Kluwer Academic.<br />

Lassiter, G.D., Clark, J.K., Daniels, L.E., & So<strong>in</strong>ski, M. (2004,<br />

March). Can we recognize false confessions and does <strong>the</strong> presen-<br />

64 Volume 5—Number 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!