Overview of Further Education colleges (PDF | 262 ... - Audit Scotland
Overview of Further Education colleges (PDF | 262 ... - Audit Scotland
Overview of Further Education colleges (PDF | 262 ... - Audit Scotland
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Executive summary<br />
Introduction<br />
1. Under the <strong>Further</strong> and Higher <strong>Education</strong> (<strong>Scotland</strong>) Act 1992 (the 1992 Act),<br />
most further education <strong>colleges</strong> in <strong>Scotland</strong> were transferred from local<br />
education authority control on 1 April 1993. Forty-three <strong>colleges</strong> were<br />
incorporated as independent corporate bodies, each governed by a board <strong>of</strong><br />
management, and assumed ownership and control <strong>of</strong> all their assets and<br />
liabilities at the date <strong>of</strong> transfer. They have a combined income <strong>of</strong> around<br />
£550 million per annum about three-quarters <strong>of</strong> which is grant-in-aid<br />
payments provided by the Scottish Executive Enterprise and Lifelong<br />
Learning Department (the Department) via the Scottish <strong>Further</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />
Funding Council (SFEFC). Roles and responsibilities in the further education<br />
sector in <strong>Scotland</strong> are shown at Exhibit 1.<br />
2. Under the terms <strong>of</strong> the Public Finance and Accountability (<strong>Scotland</strong>) Act<br />
2000 (the 2000 Act) responsibility for securing the audit <strong>of</strong> the 43<br />
incorporated further education <strong>colleges</strong> in <strong>Scotland</strong> transferred from the<br />
college boards to the <strong>Audit</strong>or General for <strong>Scotland</strong> with effect from 1 April<br />
2000. Transitional arrangements applied to the audit <strong>of</strong> 1999/2000 accounts.<br />
The audits <strong>of</strong> further education <strong>colleges</strong>, which had been commissioned in<br />
advance by the <strong>colleges</strong> themselves, and carried out in accordance with<br />
guidance first issued in 1996 by the Scottish Office <strong>Education</strong> and Industry<br />
Department, were reported to the <strong>Audit</strong>or General after their completion.<br />
The <strong>colleges</strong> appointed commercial accountancy firms to conduct the<br />
1999/2000 audits. <strong>Audit</strong>ors also reported to and agreed findings with<br />
individual <strong>colleges</strong> and provided copies <strong>of</strong> their management letters to<br />
SFEFC.<br />
3. This report, which I present under section 23 <strong>of</strong> the 2000 Act, is my first<br />
overview report on the further education sector. The report has been<br />
prepared principally from information contained in reports prepared by the<br />
<strong>colleges</strong>’ appointed auditors at the conclusion <strong>of</strong> their audits. Where<br />
appropriate, I have supplemented this with other relevant, contextual<br />
information including SFEFC’s own work in monitoring the financial health<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sector. My report covers all the significant issues arising out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
1999/2000 audits <strong>of</strong> incorporated further education <strong>colleges</strong>.<br />
4. Overall, auditors’ reports provide assurance <strong>of</strong> sound financial stewardship in<br />
the FE sector in <strong>Scotland</strong>. However, my report on governance and financial<br />
management at Moray College shows how a failure to maintain the highest<br />
standards can result in serious difficulties.<br />
5. The audit results also highlight the extent to which <strong>colleges</strong> are experiencing<br />
severe financial difficulties. <strong>Audit</strong>ed accounts for the period to 31 July 2000<br />
showed that a total <strong>of</strong> 34 <strong>colleges</strong> reported an operating deficit for the<br />
accounting period and auditors’ opinions on the financial statements <strong>of</strong> five<br />
<strong>colleges</strong> noted that the <strong>colleges</strong> only remained going concerns on the<br />
understanding that financial support from SFEFC or the college’s bankers would<br />
continue. <strong>Further</strong>more SFEFC have required 12 <strong>colleges</strong> to prepare financial<br />
recovery plans to address deficits accumulated over a number <strong>of</strong> years. My<br />
report therefore comments on continuing risks to financial health and on<br />
SFEFC’s considerable efforts to improve the financial health <strong>of</strong> the sector.<br />
FE <strong>colleges</strong> overview<br />
1