06.11.2014 Views

Introduction to PalmGHG The RSPO greenhouse gas ... - RT9 2011

Introduction to PalmGHG The RSPO greenhouse gas ... - RT9 2011

Introduction to PalmGHG The RSPO greenhouse gas ... - RT9 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>PalmGHG</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>RSPO</strong> <strong>greenhouse</strong> <strong>gas</strong> calcula<strong>to</strong>r<br />

for oil palm products<br />

Laurence Chase (Independent Consultant)<br />

Cecile Bessou (CIRAD)<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 1/18


Workstream 1<br />

Measuring, moni<strong>to</strong>ring & reporting operational GHG<br />

emissions<br />

Amir Faizal Naidu Abdul-Manan, fuels scientist, Shell Global Solutions Sdn. Bhd.<br />

Cécile Bessou (lead author), Ph.D., researcher at CIRAD<br />

Jean-Pierre Caliman, Ph.D., producer, Direc<strong>to</strong>r of the SMART-Research Institute<br />

Laurence Chase, MSc., Independent Consultant in Tropical Agriculture<br />

Sau Soon Chen, Assoc. Prof. Ph.D., SIRIM Environmental & Bioprocess Technology Centre<br />

Shabbir Gheewala, Prof. Ph.D., researcher at the Joint Graduate School of Energy and<br />

Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology<br />

Ian E. Henson, Ph.D., Independent Consultant in Tropical Agriculture<br />

Simon Lord, Ph.D., producer, Group Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Sustainability, New Britain Palm Oil<br />

Llorenç Mila-i-Canals, Ph.D., researcher at Unilever R&D<br />

Pavithra Ramani, Project manager in agricultural commodities, with focus in the palm oil and<br />

biofuel sec<strong>to</strong>rs at Proforest<br />

Bambang H. Saharjo, Prof. Ph.D., consultant for Sawit Watch, NGO<br />

Mukesh Sharma, Ph.D., producer, Head of R&D at the Asian Agri Group<br />

Adrian Suhar<strong>to</strong>, producer, Sustainability Manager, Neste Oil Singapore Pte Ltd<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 2/18


<strong>PalmGHG</strong><br />

Palm products <strong>greenhouse</strong> <strong>gas</strong> accounting <strong>to</strong>ol<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 3/18


<strong>PalmGHG</strong><br />

A calcula<strong>to</strong>r that quantifies the major forms of GHG emissions<br />

and C sequestration from a mill and its supply base (estate and<br />

out-growers)<br />

It is based on a harmonized framework that is compatible with<br />

international GHG accounting methodologies (IPCC, ISCC, etc.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> content of the calcula<strong>to</strong>r and the features of the <strong>to</strong>ol have<br />

been discussed within the whole GHG Working Group 2<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 4/18


System boundary<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 5/18


Important features<br />

a) Flexibility:<br />

I. Adoption of different crop rotation lengths and possible choice of<br />

oil palm growth data<br />

II. It allows use of alternatives <strong>to</strong> the standard defaults<br />

III.<br />

It allows for the calculation of GHG for CPO, PKO and bio-diesel (<strong>to</strong><br />

be compatible with the European Renewable Energy Directive<br />

requirements)<br />

b) It caters for CO 2 emissions from land use change and peat soils<br />

management<br />

c) It allocates <strong>to</strong>tal net emissions between co-products<br />

d) It calculates annual net emissions per ha and per <strong>to</strong>nne of palm product;<br />

may be updated yearly<br />

e) It allows for scenario testing<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 6/18


<strong>PalmGHG</strong> pilot<br />

Presentation of the pilot testing<br />

Objectives of the pilot<br />

⇒ To allow growers <strong>to</strong> experiment with the <strong>to</strong>ol: how can it be<br />

used and what can it be used for?<br />

⇒ To test the consistency of the calcula<strong>to</strong>r: are all needed data<br />

available?<br />

⇒ To gather feedback from users <strong>to</strong> outline improvement needs<br />

and development priorities<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 7/18


Overview of pilot results<br />

Mills<br />

Mean<br />

tFFB/ha<br />

Outgrowers<br />

included<br />

Peat<br />

soils<br />

Previous land use<br />

A1 23 no no shrub 0.05<br />

A2 24 no no shrub -0.07<br />

B 26 no no cocoa, oil palm 0.79<br />

C1 23 yes 25% grassland, shrub 0.73<br />

C2 19 yes 80% grassland, shrub 2.46<br />

F 19 no no logged forest, oil palm 1.85<br />

G 26 yes no wide range from logged<br />

forest <strong>to</strong> arable crops<br />

tCO2e/tCPO<br />

1.15<br />

H 17 yes no logged forest 1.35<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 8/18


Net emissions for pilot mills<br />

A1<br />

0.05<br />

A2<br />

-0.07<br />

B<br />

0.79<br />

Pilot companies<br />

C1<br />

C2<br />

F<br />

0.73<br />

1.85<br />

2.46<br />

G<br />

1.15<br />

H<br />

1.35<br />

t CO2e/t CPO<br />

-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 9/18


Pilot results:<br />

Example of mill C1 base case<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

t CO2e/tCPO<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

-0.5<br />

26%<br />

14%<br />

Land<br />

Clearing<br />

43%<br />

52%<br />

28%<br />

0.78<br />

0%<br />

12%<br />

8% 9%<br />

5% 2%<br />

-1<br />

1%<br />

-1.12<br />

0.02<br />

Peat CH4 Mill Fuel N2O Ferti. Field Fuel Elec. Seq. Net Em.<br />

-1<br />

-1.5<br />

Estate<br />

Out-growers<br />

-2<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 10/18


Pilot mill C1:<br />

Combining estate & outgrowers<br />

1.20<br />

1.00<br />

0.91<br />

0.96<br />

0.80<br />

0.73<br />

+/- 25%<br />

+32%<br />

tCO2e/tCPO<br />

0.60<br />

0.55<br />

- 60%<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.26<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.00<br />

Base case Grassland Shrub Flaring of<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

Electricity<br />

from bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

Low peat<br />

emissions<br />

(10 t/ha/yr)<br />

High Peat<br />

emissions<br />

(30 t/ha/yr)<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 11/18


Pilot mill G:<br />

Base case<br />

2.00<br />

63.8%<br />

1.50<br />

1.15<br />

t CO2e/t CPO<br />

1.00<br />

0.50<br />

0.00<br />

-0.50<br />

Land<br />

Clearing<br />

25.6%<br />

2.2% 0.4%<br />

3.4% 3.6% 1.0% 0% -1.64<br />

Peat CH4 Mill Fuel N2O Ferti. Field<br />

Fuel<br />

Elec. Seq. Net Em.<br />

-1.00<br />

-1.50<br />

-2.00<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 12/18


Pilot mill G:<br />

Capture and flare methane<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 13/18


Pilot mill G:<br />

Capture methane and convert in<strong>to</strong> electricity<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 14/18


Pilot Mill G:<br />

100% replant, capture CH4 and convert in<strong>to</strong> electricity,<br />

reduced outgrower sequestration by 10%<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 15/18


Scenario testing<br />

Base case 1: mixed previous land uses, peat 3%, no POME<br />

treatment, OER 20.8%, estate 20.2tFFB/ha, outgrowers 14.2tFFB/ha<br />

5.09<br />

Net emissions<br />

tCO2e/tCPOtCPO<br />

1.58<br />

0.71<br />

0.27<br />

0.24<br />

-0.62<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 16/18


Scenario testing<br />

Base case 1: mixed previous land uses, peat 3%, no POME<br />

treatment, OER 20.8%, estate 20.2tFFB/ha, outgrowers 14.2tFFB/ha<br />

1.58<br />

Net emissions<br />

tCO2e/tCPOtCPO<br />

0.71<br />

0.27<br />

0.24<br />

-0.62<br />

1 2 3 5 6<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 17/18


<strong>PalmGHG</strong> development<br />

After Pilot Phase<br />

⇒ Update C s<strong>to</strong>ck values and peat emission fac<strong>to</strong>rs from WS3<br />

⇒ Incorporate biofuel calculations for potential<br />

compliance with RED<br />

⇒ Peer review of <strong>PalmGHG</strong><br />

⇒ Post-review development - user friendly, manual<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 18/18


Thank you<br />

23/11/<strong>2011</strong> 19/18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!