07.11.2014 Views

Kimberly Johnson, RHIA, CPC, CHC - Health Care Compliance ...

Kimberly Johnson, RHIA, CPC, CHC - Health Care Compliance ...

Kimberly Johnson, RHIA, CPC, CHC - Health Care Compliance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

focus<br />

feature<br />

Sparking an epidemic of compliance<br />

By Stephen Kelly, JD, LLM, <strong>CHC</strong>, CHRC<br />

July 2010<br />

20<br />

Editor’s note: Stephen Kelly is the Chief <strong>Compliance</strong> & Privacy Officer for<br />

the Carle Foundation Hospital and <strong>Health</strong> System, located in Urbana,<br />

Illinois. He may be contacted by telephone at 217/383-3927 or by e-mail<br />

at mcshane66@gmail.com.<br />

It’s axiomatic that an organization cannot have a culture of compliance<br />

without executive leadership and the board members<br />

setting the right “tone at the top.” The conventional wisdom<br />

is that if the leaders of the organization talk the talk and walk the<br />

walk, somehow a compliance ethos will permeate all layers of the<br />

organization. Undoubtedly, having leaders who pay more than lip<br />

service to compliance and ethics is a huge step in the right direction.<br />

Without their support, the compliance program doesn’t get the staff<br />

and resources it needs, it doesn’t get included in significant decisions<br />

affecting the structure and operation of the organization, and it<br />

doesn’t get the muscle to mete out discipline or to make significant<br />

overpayment refunds to payers and the government. After reading<br />

Malcolm Gladwell’s, The Tipping Point, 1 however, I began to question<br />

the assumptions that once an organization’s leadership has bought in<br />

to the compliance program, the rest of the organization will surely<br />

follow, or that creating a “tone at the top” is the only way to create a<br />

culture of compliance.<br />

If you have not read it, The Tipping Point, is a compelling study of<br />

how the rules governing viral epidemics can also be used to explain<br />

dramatic changes in social behaviors, cultural trends, and the broad<br />

acceptance of new ideas. According to Gladwell, there is a tendency to<br />

think that, in order to affect major change, one has to put out major<br />

effort in order to have the desired impact. For example, I once thought<br />

developing a culture of compliance in my organization could be<br />

accomplished through a series of over-the-top gestures, such as getting<br />

in a dunk tank during <strong>Compliance</strong> & Ethics Week, or by showing<br />

up on the clinical floors in the middle of the night to demonstrate<br />

the organization’s commitment to compliance. To the contrary, the<br />

key message of The Tipping Point is that dramatic changes in societal<br />

or organizational behavior are not necessarily achieved through such<br />

grandiose efforts. Instead, they are normally achieved through a series<br />

of much smaller adjustments: adjustments to the message being<br />

communicated, to the type of people to whom the message is delivered<br />

and, finally, to the environment in which the message is delivered. By<br />

making such small-scale adjustments, one can accelerate the contagiousness<br />

of an idea, trend, or behavior to the tipping point, which is<br />

the point where it becomes a cultural or social epidemic. This article<br />

examines Gladwell’s thesis and ponders whether the ideas presented<br />

in The Tipping Point can be applied to the chief aim of compliance<br />

programs (i.e., to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse and to develop a<br />

culture of compliance throughout an organization). In other words,<br />

can one create an “epidemic” of compliance?<br />

The three rules of epidemics<br />

In his study of social epidemics, Gladwell identified three unifying<br />

principles that all of them have in common. By altering a message<br />

to exploit these rules, Gladwell suggests that we have the power to<br />

control what ideas transform into epidemics both in society and in our<br />

organizations.<br />

Rule number one: The Law of the Few<br />

Gladwell’s first rule of epidemics is The Law of the Few, which holds<br />

that the spread of a social epidemic heavily depends on a very small<br />

number of people who become the primary agents of change. These<br />

are people who are blessed with certain social gifts and who most<br />

effectively carry the message, new trend, or idea (i.e., the contagion) to<br />

the broader population we are trying to reach. Gladwell refers to these<br />

people as Connectors, Mavens, and Salesmen.<br />

A Connector is the type of person who seems to know everyone and<br />

is a natural at networking. If you go to lunch with a Connector, he<br />

or she will probably run into somebody they know. Not only do<br />

Connectors know a lot of people, they know a lot of different types<br />

of people. For example, in high school, a Connector was the kid who<br />

could easily circulate amongst the jocks, the nerds, and the artsy crowd<br />

with little difficulty. In our context, Connectors are important because<br />

<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Compliance</strong> Association • 888-580-8373 • www.hcca-info.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!