07.11.2014 Views

AAIB Investigation Updates (PDF) - Airline Safety and Security ...

AAIB Investigation Updates (PDF) - Airline Safety and Security ...

AAIB Investigation Updates (PDF) - Airline Safety and Security ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>AAIB</strong> Interim Report G-YMMM EW/C2008/01/01<br />

Fuel System<br />

A pressure <strong>and</strong> vacuum check was carried out on the<br />

aircraft fuel feed system, <strong>and</strong> all of the pipelines were<br />

inspected by videoscope before the main mechanical <strong>and</strong><br />

electrical components were removed for examination<br />

<strong>and</strong> testing. In addition, the entire left fuel feed system<br />

was removed from the aircraft, all the seals were<br />

inspected <strong>and</strong> the system was reassembled at the <strong>AAIB</strong><br />

facility at Farnborough. The surge tank pressure relief<br />

valves, which had not operated in flight, were tested<br />

<strong>and</strong> found to be serviceable <strong>and</strong> there was no structural<br />

deformation to the fuel tanks which would have resulted<br />

from a blockage in the vent system.<br />

The examination <strong>and</strong> testing found no faults in the<br />

aircraft fuel system that could have restricted the fuel<br />

flow to the engines.<br />

Engines<br />

With the exception of the two EECs <strong>and</strong> the FOHE/<br />

LP filter assemblies, most of the engine control system<br />

components, located beneath the engine, were too badly<br />

damaged or contaminated with dirt <strong>and</strong> fire fighting media<br />

to be functionally tested. However, all components were<br />

strip‐examined <strong>and</strong> individual sub‐assemblies tested<br />

where possible.<br />

No pre‐existing defects or evidence of abnormal<br />

operation were found with the exception of signs of<br />

abnormal cavitation erosion on the delivery side of both<br />

HP pumps. Some small debris was recovered from<br />

the left FOHE inlet chamber but this would not have<br />

restricted the fuel flow. Both of these observations<br />

have been reported in previous <strong>AAIB</strong> Special Bulletins,<br />

01/2008 <strong>and</strong> 03/2008.<br />

The EECs, whose NVM was successfully downloaded<br />

© Crown copyright 2008<br />

10<br />

soon after the accident, have not been tested because to<br />

do so would require erasing the installed software <strong>and</strong><br />

loading special test software. Since the recorded data <strong>and</strong><br />

the NVM indicate that there were no anomalies with either<br />

EEC, testing of these units is not currently planned.<br />

Fuel loading<br />

G‐YMMM was refuelled at Beijing with 71,401 kg of<br />

No 3 Jet Fuel (Peoples Republic of China), at a fuel<br />

temperature of 5°C (41 o F); the refuelling was completed<br />

30 minutes before the engines were started for the return<br />

flight to Heathrow <strong>and</strong> the total fuel load was 79,000 kg.<br />

At the start of the flight the recorded temperature of the<br />

fuel in the left main tank was ‐2°C (28°F). No 3 Jet<br />

Fuel complies with the UK <strong>and</strong> USA specifications for<br />

Jet A‐1.<br />

The FDR shows that at the time of the accident the total<br />

fuel on the aircraft was 10,500 kg, with 5,100 kg in<br />

the left main tank <strong>and</strong> 5,400 kg in the right main tank.<br />

Following the accident, approximately 6,500 to 7,100 kg<br />

of fuel had leaked out of fractured engine fuel pipes<br />

before the spar valves were manually closed.<br />

Fuel testing<br />

Following the accident, 66 fuel samples were taken from<br />

the aircraft <strong>and</strong> the engines. A number of these samples<br />

were tested <strong>and</strong> critical properties such as the freezing<br />

point, density, flash point, viscosity, contamination, fuel<br />

additives <strong>and</strong> presence of water were tested against DEF<br />

STAN 91‐91 <strong>and</strong> ASTM D1655 requirements 2 . The fuel<br />

samples complied fully with the fuel specifications for<br />

Jet A‐1. Additional tests were carried out to detect any<br />

unusual components that would not normally be found<br />

in aviation turbine fuels. No evidence of contamination<br />

Footnote<br />

2<br />

DEF STAN 91-91 <strong>and</strong> ASTM D1655 contain the st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

specifications for aviation turbine fuels.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!