Perspectives on Vascular Closure Device and the Latest Evidence
Perspectives on Vascular Closure Device and the Latest Evidence
Perspectives on Vascular Closure Device and the Latest Evidence
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Study<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Perspectives</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Vascular</strong> <strong>Closure</strong> <strong>Device</strong>s<br />
Large C<strong>on</strong>trolled/ Meta-analysis Studies: VCDs Vs MC<br />
Study<br />
Type<br />
N<br />
<strong>Device</strong><br />
Comparis<strong>on</strong><br />
End Point<br />
Outcomes<br />
Cura et al Registry 2918 VCD vs. mc Vas. Complicati<strong>on</strong> AngioSeal 2.9%<br />
Perclose 3.2%<br />
MC 3.1% P=NS<br />
Dangas et al Registry 5039 VCD vs. MC Surgicl Repair VCD 2.5%<br />
MC1.5% P=0.03<br />
Resnic et al Rigietry 3027 VCD vs. MC Vas. Complicati<strong>on</strong> MC5.5%<br />
Vcd3.0% P=0.002<br />
Dangas et al<br />
Tavris et al<br />
Exaire e tal<br />
Koreny et al<br />
Viatkus<br />
Nikolsky et al<br />
Pooled<br />
R<strong>and</strong>.Trial<br />
ACC-<br />
NCDR<br />
Target s<br />
Stbstudy<br />
Metaanalysi<br />
Metaanalysis<br />
Metaanalysis<br />
Applegagte et al Registry 4699 AngioSeal vs<br />
MC<br />
2095 VCD vs. mc <strong>Device</strong> Complic. VCD8.5%<br />
MC5.9% P=0.02<br />
166,680 VCD vx. MC Vasc. Complic. 1.05to 1.48% VCD<br />
1.7% for MC P
Change language