08.11.2014 Views

Homework # 2 - ISyE 6230 – Economic Decision Analysis Spring ...

Homework # 2 - ISyE 6230 – Economic Decision Analysis Spring ...

Homework # 2 - ISyE 6230 – Economic Decision Analysis Spring ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Homework</strong> # 2 - <strong>ISyE</strong> <strong>6230</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Decision</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

<strong>Spring</strong> 2009<br />

1. In class we discussed mixed strategies for normal form games and showed a<br />

condition that allows us to solve for the Nash equilibrium. For a two-person, twoaction<br />

normal form game, it is possible to show the equilibria graphically. In this<br />

case, consider the notion of a “response” function. That is, R1 is the best<br />

response that player 1 can make given player 2's action choice. Recall that player<br />

2's action will be the probability of choosing action 1 (and since there are only<br />

two actions, then this defines the probability of choosing action 2), and so the<br />

response function will be a function of the probability choice. For the following<br />

game, make a plot of R1(q) versus R2(p), where p is the probability that player 1<br />

chooses action 1 and q is the probability of player 2 choosing action 1. The<br />

intersection(s) of the the response curves will by definition define the equilibrium<br />

point(s). For the graph, make the x-axis R1(q) (which is the value of p chosen by<br />

player 1) and the y-axis R2(p) (which is the value of q chosen by player 2).<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A1 -1,1 1,-1<br />

A2 1,-1 -1.1<br />

2. Repeat this process for the following game:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A1 2,1 0,0<br />

A2 0,0 1,2<br />

3. In class we derived the results for a Cournot duopoly with a linear demand<br />

function. Derive the formula for N firms and compare the results to N firms that<br />

are colluding (think of this as a monopoly that has N even parts). What happens<br />

as N approaches infinity?<br />

4. In class we showed the results for a Bertrand duopoly (but didn’t derive). Explain<br />

why the results hold.<br />

5. Show there are no mixed strategy equilibria in the Prisoner’s dilemma game.<br />

6. (For PhD students). A two-person zero-sum game is one where for each outcome,<br />

the payoffs sum to zero. That is, they are strictly competitive in that for each<br />

outcome there is a winner and a loser. Consider the simple rock, scissors, paper<br />

game. Do the following:<br />

1. Write out the payoff matrix for this game (let 1=win, -1=loss, 0=tie). Note<br />

that since a zero-sum game, you only need a single element for each outcome.<br />

1


2. Write a linear program to find the optimal strategy for each player.<br />

3. Comment on the result.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!