08.11.2014 Views

calculus-2014-05-21

calculus-2014-05-21

calculus-2014-05-21

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DRAFT c○ <strong>2014</strong> Julian Fleron, Philip Hotchkiss, Volker Ecke, Christine von Renesse<br />

11. Now use your calculator to compute these values. Do the values agree with your predictions?<br />

Explain what happened.<br />

12. What is the exact, decimal value of 1 9 .<br />

13. Explain how you this enables you to determine the exact, decimal values of 2 9 , 3 9 , . . . 8 9 .<br />

14. What is the value of 1 9 + 8 9 ?<br />

15. Use your decimal values to compute the decimal value of 1 9 + 8 9 .<br />

16. What does this tell you about 0.999999 . . .?<br />

17. Have these investigations changed your answer to Investigation 1? Explain.<br />

Seventh Grader Makes Amazing Discovery<br />

New discoveries and solutions to open questions in mathematics are not always made by professional<br />

mathematicians. Throughout history mathematics has also progressed in important ways<br />

by the work of “amateurs.” Our discussion of 0.9999999 . . . provides a perfect opportunity to see<br />

one of these examples.<br />

As a seventh grader Anna Mills (American Writer and English Teacher; 1975 - ) was encouraged<br />

to make discoveries like you have above about the number 0.999999 . . . Afterwards Anna<br />

began experimenting with related numbers on her own. When she considered the (infinitely) large<br />

number . . . 999999.0 she was surprised when her analysis “proved” that . . . 999999.0 = −1! She<br />

even checked that this was “true” by showing that this number . . . 999999.0 “solves” the algebraic<br />

equations x + 1 = 0 and 2x = x − 1, just like the number −1 does.<br />

Encouraged by her teacher and her father to pursue this matter, Anna contacted Paul Fjelstad<br />

(American Mathematician; 1929 - ). Fjelstad was able to determine that Anna’s seemingly<br />

absurd discovery that . . . 999999.0 = −1 is, in fact, true as long as one thinks of these numbers<br />

in the settings of modular arithmetic and p-adic numbers.<br />

You can see more about this discovery in Discovering the Art of Mathematics - The Infinite<br />

or in Fjelstad’s paper “The repeating integer paradox” in The College Mathematics Journal, vol.<br />

26, no. 1, January 1995, pp. 11-15.<br />

18. What do you think about Anna Mills’ discovery?<br />

We close this section by noting that there are different systems of numbers than the real numbers.<br />

In particular, the surreal numbers considered in the companion book Discovering the Art of Mathematics<br />

- The Infinite are a system of numbers that include infinitely many different infinitely small<br />

non-zero numbers. And this opens Pandora’s Box right back up.<br />

In general, most mathematicians (and engineers, scientists, etc.) work solely with the real numbers<br />

and do not give much thought to these alternative numbers systems. But the existence of these<br />

different, surprising worlds remain of deep interest to some.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!