08.11.2014 Views

Lands & Regulation - Nunavut Planning - Industry Letter

Lands & Regulation - Nunavut Planning - Industry Letter

Lands & Regulation - Nunavut Planning - Industry Letter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It is therefore recommended that subsection 154(1) and, in particular paragraph (b) of that<br />

subsection, adopt an analogous approach, and be amended to read as follows:<br />

154. (1) ...the proponent may undertake or carry out exploration or<br />

development activities that relate directly to a project that is subject to a<br />

review under this Part if<br />

. . .<br />

(b) the activities may, in the Board’s opinion, after consulting with<br />

the proponent, proceed without such a review.<br />

The proposed amendment may be of particular importance until Schedule 3 of Bill C-<br />

215 has been enacted to define works and undertakings that are exempt from screening,<br />

and until regulations made pursuant to paragraph 228(2)(b) have defined any “class of<br />

non-exempt activities” as contemplated by paragraph 154(1)(a) that are subject to the<br />

proposed enactment.<br />

4. Section 208 – Exemption of a Suspended Project from Assessment<br />

Section 208 provides that certain projects are exempt from an assessment under Part 3<br />

of the proposed enactment. Paragraph 208(1)(b) states that exempt projects include<br />

“...the rebuilding of a work that has been closed for a period of less than five years if it<br />

relates to a project that was approved under [Part 3] and lawfully carried out”.<br />

By incorporating the words “...and lawfully carried out...”, section 208 would<br />

potentially have the effect of disqualifying a project from the exemption that would<br />

otherwise be available because of an infraction of some other law or regulation, no<br />

matter how minor or unrelated to adverse environmental or socio-economic impacts the<br />

non-compliance may have been.<br />

Paragraph 208(1)(b) should therefore be amended to ensure that the exemption from<br />

further review will only be denied where the project has not been carried out<br />

substantially in accordance with the proposed legislation.<br />

It is therefore recommended that paragraph 208(1)(b) be revised to read as follows:<br />

(b)<br />

the rebuilding of a work that has been closed for less than five years if it<br />

relates to a project that was approved under [Part 3] and has been carried<br />

out substantially in accordance with this Act.<br />

5. Section 235 – Exemption of a Project Being Assessed under the NLCA<br />

Paragraph 235(1)(a) exempts, from the application of Bill C-25, “...any project that is<br />

being assessed under the [<strong>Nunavut</strong> Land Claims] Agreement or is being, or has been,<br />

lawfully carried out on the day this section comes into force.”<br />

Page 8 of 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!