interview with dr. judy wood and dr. greg jenkins - Journal of 9/11 ...

JW: I’m taking about the data on my website. I’m not making calculations for how much
it took for anything, as I don’t think we should get distracted with that…
GJ: Conservation of energy is not a distraction.
JW: (holding up photo of South Tower) Is this pulverized?
GJ: I see falling debris there, now, maybe it’s not, maybe that’s a different picture of
something else, I don’t know.
JW: The building is pulverized, and you see when the story is over with at the end of the
day, you don’t have much building left, anywhere. The buildings are gone. Let’s look at
Building Six for example. You get these big holes with nothing in them. Where did the
material go?
GJ: If you melted down all the steel in the…
JW: Where did it go?
GJ: If you melt down all the steel in that…
JW: You’ve changed the subject.
GJ: No, no, I’m not. I’m really not. If you bear with me you’ll see that I’m not… in the
top 110 floors of the building, if you melted down the steel into its footprint it would only
be six feet tall. There’d be one slab, the cross sectional area of the building six feet tall…
JW: How about the concrete? How about the bookcases and so forth? It’d be more than
six feet tall.
GJ: Not much. Not if you melted it all down. I’m just saying that is the amount of steel.
JW: Is that what you’re saying…
GJ: Those buildings really were mostly empty space by volume, so you have to do some
analysis…
JW: Is dust denser than solid steel or is it less dense?
GJ: Of course not. It’s much less dense.
JW: Okay, so how much do we have?
GJ: How much of what should we have?
JW: (no reply)