English - Alliance Defending Freedom Media
English - Alliance Defending Freedom Media
English - Alliance Defending Freedom Media
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
27<br />
“that human life begins at the very moment of conception and ought to warrant complete<br />
protection from that moment, both in domestic law as well as international law.” 114<br />
2.2. Other Cases<br />
A more recent case regarding abortion is the petition of Paulina del Carmen Ramírez Jacinto<br />
against Mexico. 115 The applicants of this case were NGOs who alleged the violation of several<br />
articles of various international conventions. The facts concerned a minor who was pregnant as<br />
a consequence of rape. She, with the consent of her mother, tried to have an abortion according<br />
to the laws of the Mexican state of Baja California. However, many obstacles were set against<br />
the performance of this legal action, to the effect that the applicant gave birth to her child, Isaac<br />
de Jesús.<br />
México and Paulina Ramírez settled this case with an agreement, whereby the State<br />
acknowledged its responsibility for not implementing an adequate procedure for enabling<br />
women to perform abortions which are authorized by law, and in which it agreed to create and<br />
implement these procedures, and pay some monetary compensation to both Paulina Ramírez<br />
and her child. 116 Noticeably, this case does not refer to the issue of whether abortion is<br />
permissible or required according to the Convention, but rather to the admissibility of obstacles<br />
to the performance of legally accepted abortions. Therefore, the Commission did not explicitly<br />
develop its understanding on the status of the unborn. 117<br />
On February 26, 2010, the Inter-American Commission issued a precautionary measure<br />
against Nicaragua in the matter of “Amelia.” 118 This case referred to a pregnant woman who<br />
was denied the necessary medical assistance for treating a cancer. The reason for denying this<br />
treatment was that a chemotherapy or radiotherapy could provoke an abortion. Thus, the<br />
Commission requested the State to adopt the necessary measures for assuring that “Amelia”<br />
would receive the relevant medical treatment.<br />
Within the five days deadline the State of<br />
114 Id., 8.<br />
115 Ramírez Jacinto against Mexico, Petition 161-02, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 21/07, Friendly<br />
Settlement (2007), available at https://cidh.oas.org/annualrep/2007eng/Mexico161.02eng.htm (last visited Feb. 27,<br />
2011).<br />
116 The text of the public recognition of responsibility published in an official Mexican newspaper is<br />
appended to Ramírez Jacinto against Mexico, Report No. 21/07, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R.<br />
117 The Commission makes a reference to women’s rights and the Belém do Pará Convention, but makes<br />
no statement about the unborn. Id., 19.<br />
118 “Amelia,” Nicaragua, PM No. 43-10, 2010, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R. Available at<br />
http://www.cidh.oas.org/medidas/2010.eng.htm (last visited Sept. 2, 2011).