10.11.2014 Views

Invasive plants in Mediterranean type regions of the world ... - Lipor

Invasive plants in Mediterranean type regions of the world ... - Lipor

Invasive plants in Mediterranean type regions of the world ... - Lipor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Invasive</strong> plant species <strong>in</strong> Portugal: an overview<br />

Hélia Marchante1, Elizabete Marchante2, Helena Freitas2<br />

1 Sector de Biologia e Ecologia, Escola Superior Agrária de Coimbra, 3040-316 Coimbra,<br />

Portugal<br />

2 Departamento de Botânica, Universidade de Coimbra, 3049 Coimbra, Portugal<br />

Email: hmarchante@esac.pt<br />

Abstract<br />

The <strong>in</strong>vasion by exotic <strong>plants</strong> is threaten<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Portuguese native flora becom<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

serious environmental problem. In <strong>the</strong> last two centuries, and especially <strong>in</strong> recent<br />

decades, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduced plant species <strong>in</strong>creased extensively with aliens<br />

represent<strong>in</strong>g nowadays more than 15 % <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> ca. 3200 taxa <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Portuguese<br />

vascular flora. Their presence has <strong>in</strong>creased probably more than 1000 % dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

last two centuries, reach<strong>in</strong>g nowadays <strong>the</strong> worry<strong>in</strong>g figure <strong>of</strong> about 500 species.<br />

Almost 40 % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> listed species are actually or potentially <strong>in</strong>vasive, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

agricultural weeds and <strong>in</strong>vaders <strong>of</strong> natural habitats, and ca. 7% are considered<br />

dangerous <strong>in</strong>vaders. Legum<strong>in</strong>osae and Asteraceae provide <strong>the</strong> largest numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

problematic species. Australia seems to supply <strong>the</strong> most dangerous and aggressive<br />

<strong>in</strong>vaders <strong>in</strong> Portugal, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g several Acacia and Hakea species. From different<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>s and taxonomies Ailanthus altissima and Cortaderia selloana also worth special<br />

attention due to <strong>the</strong> current drastic <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir distribution.<br />

Recently, Portuguese legislation has recognised this problem (dec.- lei 565/99),<br />

creat<strong>in</strong>g a list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exotic species <strong>in</strong>troduced, identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasive ones, and<br />

forbidd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> new species unless proven not harmful. Although this<br />

list does not <strong>in</strong>clude all <strong>the</strong> species <strong>in</strong>troduced and despite <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

exceptions for forestry and agricultural purposes, it is a good start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t. The<br />

legislative process is still be<strong>in</strong>g implemented and will apply penalties to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

listed <strong>in</strong>vasive species. As next steps, <strong>the</strong> list needs updat<strong>in</strong>g and it is essential to<br />

implement <strong>the</strong> regulations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field with <strong>in</strong>spections to horticulturist, landscape<br />

architectures, gardeners, boarders and o<strong>the</strong>rs. Technician‘s tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is still needed to<br />

assure <strong>the</strong> correct application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislation.<br />

Introduction<br />

The <strong>in</strong>vasion by exotic <strong>plants</strong> is threaten<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Portuguese native flora and becom<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

serious environmental problem (Almeida & Freitas 2001, Campelo 2001, Marchante 2001;<br />

Almeida & Freitas, <strong>in</strong> press). In <strong>the</strong> last two centuries, and especially <strong>in</strong> recent decades, <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduced plant species <strong>in</strong>creased extensively with aliens represent<strong>in</strong>g nowadays<br />

more than 15 % <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> ca. 3200 taxa <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Portuguese vascular flora (Almeida 1999).<br />

Their presence has <strong>in</strong>creased probably more than 1000 % dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> last two centuries, from<br />

33 known sub-spontaneous species <strong>in</strong> 1800 reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2005 <strong>the</strong> worry<strong>in</strong>g figure <strong>of</strong> about<br />

550 species (Almeida & Freitas, <strong>in</strong> press) and still <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g (Figure 1). This data should be<br />

seen as conservative with new <strong>in</strong>troductions <strong>in</strong> ornamental sector be<strong>in</strong>g frequent and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

difficult to track. Almost 40 % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> listed species are actually or potentially <strong>in</strong>vasive,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g agricultural weeds and <strong>in</strong>vaders <strong>of</strong> natural habitats, and ca. 7% are considered<br />

dangerous <strong>in</strong>vaders. Fabaceae and Asteraceae provide <strong>the</strong> largest numbers <strong>of</strong> problematic<br />

species. Australia seems to supply <strong>the</strong> most dangerous and aggressive <strong>in</strong>vaders <strong>in</strong> Portugal,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g several Acacia and Hakea species.<br />

99


no <strong>of</strong> species<br />

Figure1. Increase <strong>of</strong> exotic plant<br />

species <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Portugal s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

1500 (based on Almeida 1999;<br />

Almeida & Freitas, <strong>in</strong> press).<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> worst examples <strong>of</strong><br />

species responsible for threaten<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> Portuguese native flora (Table<br />

I) are given by species <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

genus Acacia (Marchante et al. 2003), Hakea and Carpobrotus (P<strong>in</strong>to da Silva et al. 1989,<br />

Campelo 2001); Ailanthus altissima and Cortaderia selloana also worth special attention<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> current drastic <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir distribution. The big spread <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

species, namely <strong>the</strong> ones with tree habit, has already displaced large areas <strong>of</strong> native<br />

vegetation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g several areas with conservation <strong>in</strong>terest which preservation is<br />

nowadays seriously threatened.<br />

Table I. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> worst and more aggressive <strong>in</strong>vasive plant species present <strong>in</strong> Portugal<br />

Family Species Introd.purpose Habitats <strong>in</strong>vaded<br />

Aizoaceae<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> exotic plant species <strong>in</strong> Portugal<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

1500 1600 1700 1800 1850 1900 1950 2005<br />

Carpobrotus edulis (L.) N.E.<br />

Br.<br />

(South Africa)<br />

Apiaceae Eryngium pandanifolium<br />

(Umbelliferae) Cham. & Schlecht……………<br />

……………..(South America)<br />

Commel<strong>in</strong>aceae Tradescantia flum<strong>in</strong>ensis<br />

Velloso (South America)<br />

Convolvulaceae Ipomoea acum<strong>in</strong>ata (Vahl)<br />

Roem.&Sch.(Tropical <strong>regions</strong>)<br />

Haloragaceae Myriophyllum aquaticum<br />

(Vel.) Verdc. (South America)<br />

Fabaceae Acacia dealbata L<strong>in</strong>k……<br />

(SE Australia and Tasmania)<br />

(Legum<strong>in</strong>osae) Acacia melanoxylon R. Br.<br />

(SE Australia and Tasmania)<br />

Pittosporaceae<br />

Poaceae<br />

(Gram<strong>in</strong>eae)<br />

Pontederiaceae<br />

Proteaceae<br />

Simaroubaceae<br />

Acacia longifolia (Andrews)<br />

Willd. (Australia)<br />

Rob<strong>in</strong>ia pseudoacacia L.<br />

(eastern North America)<br />

Pittosporum undulatum Vent.<br />

(Australia)<br />

Cortaderia selloana (Schultes<br />

& Schultes fil.) Ascherson &<br />

Graebner (South America)<br />

Eichhornia crassipes (C.F.P.<br />

Mart.) Solms-Laub. (Tropical<br />

South America)<br />

Hakea sericea Schrad.<br />

(Eastern Australia)<br />

Hakea salicifolia (Vent.) B.L.<br />

Burtt<br />

(SE Australia and Tasmania)<br />

Ailanthus altissima (Miller)<br />

Sw<strong>in</strong>gle (Ch<strong>in</strong>a)<br />

ornamental and<br />

to fix sand dunes<br />

and slopes<br />

ornamental<br />

ornamental<br />

Ornamental<br />

accidental<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

slopes stability<br />

and ornamental<br />

ornamental;<br />

forestry, shadow<br />

curb sand erosion;<br />

ornamental<br />

forestry,<br />

ornamental and<br />

soil stabilization<br />

ornamental and<br />

shelter<br />

Ornamental<br />

Ornamental<br />

ornamental and<br />

quickset hedges<br />

ornamental;<br />

w<strong>in</strong>d break<br />

especially near<br />

<strong>the</strong> coast<br />

Ornamental<br />

coastal sand dunes, capes<br />

and next to slopes where it<br />

was planted<br />

near waterl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> low<br />

Mondego Bas<strong>in</strong><br />

shadow and humid areas;<br />

managed woods understory<br />

large carpets <strong>in</strong> disturbed<br />

habitats and slopes<br />

aquatic habitats<br />

mounta<strong>in</strong> areas, roads and<br />

river marg<strong>in</strong>s;<br />

along roads, and mounta<strong>in</strong><br />

areas adjacent to where it<br />

was planted<br />

coastal areas (sand dunes<br />

and capes); along rivers; …<br />

near rivers and roads;<br />

p<strong>in</strong>ewoods and disturbed<br />

lands<br />

managed areas where it was<br />

planted as ornamental<br />

spread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some dune<br />

systems and along roads/<br />

highways/ rails or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

water-courses and lagoons<br />

p<strong>in</strong>ewoods and disturbed<br />

lands; isolated <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong><br />

relatively prist<strong>in</strong>e places<br />

coastal areas (sand dunes),<br />

mounta<strong>in</strong> areas where it was<br />

planted and disturbed lands<br />

spread ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> urban areas<br />

and <strong>in</strong> road sides<br />

100


Portuguese legislation<br />

Early <strong>in</strong> 1974, a first law (decreto-lei 165/74 de 22 Abril) recognized water-hyac<strong>in</strong>th<br />

(Eichhornia crassipes) as an <strong>in</strong>vasive species, forbidd<strong>in</strong>g its importation, culture, sell<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

transport or possession. In 1999, <strong>the</strong> Portuguese law has recognized <strong>in</strong> a more wide-range <strong>the</strong><br />

problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasive species (decreto-lei 565/99 de 21 de Dezembro), creat<strong>in</strong>g a list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

exotic species <strong>in</strong>troduced, identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasive ones, and forbidd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong><br />

new species unless proven not harmful. This regulation was <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

commitment assumed when Portugal approved, for ratification, <strong>the</strong> Bern Convention<br />

(decreto-lei n.º 95/81, de 23 de Julho), <strong>the</strong> Bone Convention (decreto-lei n.º 103/80, de 11 de<br />

Outubro) and <strong>the</strong> Convention <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity (decreto-lei n.º 21/93, de 21 de Junho), all<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> measures limit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> deliberate <strong>in</strong>troduction and prevent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

accidental <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasive species, as well as <strong>the</strong> control or eradication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vasive species already <strong>in</strong>troduced. A previous law from 1987 (Lei de Bases do Ambiente:<br />

decreto-lei n.º 11/87, de 7 de Abril) on article 15, no. 6, demanded <strong>the</strong> elaboration <strong>of</strong><br />

adequate legislation to regulate <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> exotic plant species, and on article 16, no.<br />

3 <strong>the</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> measures <strong>of</strong> effective control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> any wild animal species<br />

both aquatic and terrestrial. The recent legislation was drawn to operate as a clean list<br />

approach, mean<strong>in</strong>g that every exotic species currently <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country should be listed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

law and to <strong>in</strong>troduce any o<strong>the</strong>r species an authorization should be asked.<br />

The legislation was prepared by ICN (Institute <strong>of</strong> Nature Conservation, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

Environment) and DGF (Forestry National Services), with <strong>the</strong> collaboration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific<br />

community, namely to set up <strong>the</strong> species list.<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasive <strong>plants</strong><br />

The law <strong>in</strong>cludes 3 separated lists <strong>of</strong> species each presented as an annex: annex I, lists <strong>the</strong><br />

non <strong>in</strong>digenous plant and animal species <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Portugal, and identifies those<br />

considered <strong>in</strong>vasive; <strong>the</strong> non <strong>in</strong>vasive species are called <strong>in</strong>digenous <strong>in</strong> what concerns <strong>the</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> this law! annex II, lists non <strong>in</strong>digenous species that are considered <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

for garden<strong>in</strong>g and forestry; <strong>the</strong>se species are also considered <strong>in</strong>digenous <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> this law! annex III, list <strong>the</strong> non <strong>in</strong>digenous species that already have<br />

ecological risk elsewhere but are not yet <strong>in</strong>vasive <strong>in</strong> Portugal.<br />

Call<strong>in</strong>g “<strong>in</strong>digenous” to all <strong>the</strong> species that are not listed as <strong>in</strong>vasive or do not hold<br />

ecological risk could lead to some mis<strong>in</strong>terpretation; particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> frequents occasions<br />

along <strong>the</strong> text when <strong>the</strong> non <strong>in</strong>digenous species are referred, not becom<strong>in</strong>g obvious which<br />

species are <strong>in</strong> fact <strong>in</strong>cluded or not.<br />

The content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> law<br />

The law limits <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tentional <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> exotic species <strong>in</strong> nature even if <strong>the</strong> aim is not to<br />

release it. Never<strong>the</strong>less, due to economical reasons, exceptions are considered to species<br />

used <strong>in</strong> agriculture (agriculture, horticulture and zootechnic). In practice, and particularly<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g both <strong>in</strong>vasive (annex I. po<strong>in</strong>ted as <strong>in</strong>vasive) and species with ecological risk<br />

(annex III), it specifically prohibits: 1) its cultivation, growth, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>in</strong> conf<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

place, utilization as ornamental plant or pet; and 2) to give, to buy, to sell, and to transport<br />

specimens <strong>of</strong> those species except when <strong>the</strong>y are dead and do not hold any viable propagule.<br />

Exceptions are considered to scientific and educational purposes, as long as legally<br />

authorized by ICN.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r exceptions are considered when propos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> a new species: 1) when<br />

it is proved to have unequivocal advantages to men <strong>of</strong> natural biocenosis; 2) when <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />

native species that fit to <strong>the</strong> same purpose; 3) when <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction is preceded by a<br />

rigorous study <strong>of</strong> impacts whose results will be relevant to <strong>the</strong> authorization. This study,<br />

101


additionally to biological and ecological characterization, can <strong>in</strong>clude controlled experiments<br />

under conf<strong>in</strong>ement which should be controlled by an adm<strong>in</strong>istrative entity. The authorization<br />

or rejection <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction depends on <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al evaluation <strong>of</strong> this entity.<br />

Exceptions are not to be allowed if <strong>the</strong> area where <strong>the</strong> species is meant to be <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes a protected area, a zone <strong>of</strong> special protection, a Natura 2000 site, an island without<br />

human population or natural lagoons. In <strong>the</strong>se particular cases, it will only be allowed if <strong>the</strong><br />

species is <strong>the</strong> only viable option to nature conservation or if human health or safety depends<br />

on it.<br />

Field impacts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> law<br />

Entities such as botanical gardens, nurseries, greenhouses, plant shops, pet shops, zoological<br />

parks, circus, game parks, etc. need to request a license to ICN to deta<strong>in</strong> non <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

species specify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species already deta<strong>in</strong>ed. O<strong>the</strong>r legislation (ex. CITES)<br />

should also be respected. If <strong>the</strong> license is conceded, regular visits from environmental bureau<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ICN) or o<strong>the</strong>r people with specific competences (governmental <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

particularly responsible by agriculture, forestry, veter<strong>in</strong>ary, fish<strong>in</strong>g and aquaculture, and<br />

police force entities), should be forecasted to check <strong>the</strong> safety conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> places that<br />

deta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> species, and to check updat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species list.<br />

Places that commercialize exotic plant and/or animals should expose to <strong>the</strong> public a synopsis<br />

<strong>of</strong> this law (published as annex 4).<br />

When a new species (<strong>the</strong>oretically all <strong>the</strong> species not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> annex I, II or III) is to be<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced an authorization should be requested to ICN. When <strong>the</strong> species to <strong>in</strong>troduce is<br />

dest<strong>in</strong>ed to be used as forestry or synergetic <strong>the</strong> authorization has to be asked to DGF,<br />

consult<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ICN. To prevent accidental <strong>in</strong>troductions <strong>the</strong> species should be submitted to<br />

quarant<strong>in</strong>e follow<strong>in</strong>g rules imposed <strong>in</strong> ICN or DGF proposals.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r technical-scientific and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative tasks contemplated <strong>in</strong> this legislation should be<br />

assured by ICN, sometimes with collaboration from DGF.<br />

Penalties are considered from 150€ to 45000€ to be paid for faults that could <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong><br />

detention <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>vasive species or <strong>the</strong> nonexistence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> license to deta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> non<br />

<strong>in</strong>digenous species, and it varies if be<strong>in</strong>g a private person or collective entity. The penalties<br />

could also <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>terdiction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> permit to keep <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ession or activity; or clos<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

commercial establishment.<br />

How is <strong>the</strong> law seen by people that deal with exotic species<br />

It is not! In a recent prelim<strong>in</strong>ary query to horticulturists, pet shops and garden<strong>in</strong>g centers,<br />

simple questions were asked about <strong>the</strong>ir knowledge regard<strong>in</strong>g this legislation and its<br />

implications. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> answers revealed <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation about it!<br />

Theoretically, <strong>the</strong> places that deta<strong>in</strong> exotic species should have asked for a license and sent a<br />

list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> non <strong>in</strong>digenous species deta<strong>in</strong>ed to ICN from edition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> law to 6 months<br />

after… we believe it never happened…<br />

Next steps and suggestions<br />

Some species were miss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all 3 annex right from <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, and now, 6 years after,<br />

<strong>the</strong> lists are far from be<strong>in</strong>g complete (figure 2) and need to be updated; new <strong>in</strong>troductions,<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to ornamental purpose, species shift<strong>in</strong>g category, namely species becom<strong>in</strong>g new<br />

<strong>in</strong>vaders, and some synonym <strong>in</strong>accuracy are already numerous and should be altered.<br />

It is essential to implement <strong>the</strong> regulations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field with a strong effort on <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g<br />

citizens directly <strong>in</strong>volved and implement<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>spections to horticulturist, pet shops, garden<br />

centers, boarders and o<strong>the</strong>rs. Technician‘s tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is still needed to assure <strong>the</strong> correct<br />

application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislation, namely <strong>in</strong> differentiat<strong>in</strong>g all <strong>the</strong> species listed.<br />

102


no.<strong>of</strong> species<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

exotic plant species <strong>in</strong> Portugal<br />

0<br />

410<br />

500<br />

potencially <strong>in</strong>vasive<br />

unkown potencial<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasive 550<br />

totals<br />

decreto 565/99 Almeida 1999 this work<br />

Figure 2. Exotic <strong>plants</strong> species<br />

categorized accord<strong>in</strong>g to its<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasiveness <strong>in</strong> Portugal,<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

different<br />

bibliographic sources: <strong>the</strong><br />

legislation (dec.565/99),<br />

Almeida (1999), and a brief<br />

update prepared to this work.<br />

To facilitate <strong>the</strong> evaluation, when someone asks for authorization to <strong>in</strong>troduce a new species,<br />

this legislation could consider a quicker way to first assess its weedy potential. For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />

a numerical score (like Australian legislation) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g plant’s prior history <strong>of</strong> weed<strong>in</strong>ess,<br />

climate preferences, biological, reproductive and dispersal traits. Each new species to be<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced would be scored by expertise’s and accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> result it would have a “yes”<br />

or “no” quick answer, or could demand some tests.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

To Mário Reis (ICN), for constructive discussions about <strong>the</strong> decreto-lei 565/99.<br />

References<br />

Almeida, J.D. 1999. Flora exótica subespontânea de Portugal cont<strong>in</strong>ental (plantas<br />

vasculares). 2.ª edição. Catálogo das plantas vasculares exóticas que ocorrem<br />

subespontâneas em Portugal cont<strong>in</strong>ental e compilação de <strong>in</strong>formações sobre estas plantas.<br />

Dissertação de Mestrado. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade de Coimbra.<br />

Almeida, J.D. & H. Freitas. 2001. The exotic and <strong>in</strong>vasive flora <strong>of</strong> Portugal. Bot.<br />

Complutensis 25: 317-327.<br />

Almeida, J.D. & H. Freitas. The exotic and <strong>in</strong>vasive flora <strong>of</strong> Portugal: a reassessment Bot.<br />

Complutensis (<strong>in</strong> press).<br />

Campelo, F. 2001. Estudo da exótica Carpobrotus edulis em ecossistemas dunares<br />

Portugueses. Dissertação de Mestrado. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade<br />

de Coimbra.<br />

Marchante, H. 2001. Invasão dos ecossistemas dunares portugueses por Acacia: uma ameaça<br />

para a biodiversidade nativa. 2001. Dissertação de Mestrado. Faculdade de Ciências e<br />

Tecnologia da Universidade de Coimbra.<br />

Marchante, H; Marchante, E & Freitas, H. 2003. Invasion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Portuguese dune ecosystems<br />

by <strong>the</strong> exotic species Acacia longifolia (Andrews) Willd.: effects at <strong>the</strong> community level. In:<br />

Child, L.E.; Brock, J.H.; Brundu, G; Prach, K.; Pysek, P.; Wade, P.M. e Williamson, M.<br />

Plant Invasions: Ecological Threats and Management Solutions. Pp. 75-85. Backhuys<br />

Publishers. The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands. Pp.75-85.<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istério do Ambiente. 1999. Decreto-lei n.º 565/99 de 21 de Dezembro. In: Diário da<br />

República - I Série – A. 295: 9100-9114.<br />

P<strong>in</strong>to da Silva, A.R., J.J.A.H. de Bacelar, F.M. Catar<strong>in</strong>o, A.I.D. Correia, A.S.C. Escudeiro<br />

M.G. Leitão Serra & C.M.A. Rodrigues. 1989. A flora da Serra de S<strong>in</strong>tra. In Portug. Acta<br />

Biol. (B) 15: 5-258.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!