Annual Report 2009 - European Banking Authority - Europa
Annual Report 2009 - European Banking Authority - Europa
Annual Report 2009 - European Banking Authority - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
38<br />
CEBS’s ACHIEVEMENTS<br />
39<br />
CEBS’s ACHIEVEMENTS<br />
4.3.2.3<br />
<strong>Report</strong> on Pillar 3 Disclosures<br />
On June <strong>2009</strong>, CEBS published a report assessing<br />
the quality and compliance with the requirements of<br />
the CRD 54 of the first Pillar 3 disclosures provided by<br />
a sample of <strong>European</strong> financial institutions. The Pillar 3<br />
disclosure requirements include new information related<br />
to capital structure, capital adequacy, risk management<br />
and risk measurement.<br />
The report highlighted that Pillar 3 disclosures have<br />
efficiently contributed to providing market participants with<br />
information allowing a better assessment of banks’ risk<br />
profiles and capital adequacy. However, CEBS identified<br />
several areas where disclosures could be enhanced:<br />
• The composition and characteristics of own funds.<br />
• Back testing information for credit risk and market risk<br />
could be further developed.<br />
• Disclosures on credit risk mitigation techniques<br />
appear too synthetic. In particular, the CEBS noted<br />
insufficiencies with regard to quantitative information<br />
and to the information on the quality of guarantors.<br />
• In the area of counterparty credit risk, banks need<br />
to elaborate further on value adjustment policies and<br />
provide more granular quantitative information.<br />
• Finally disclosure on securitisation transactions could<br />
have been more granular though those banks which<br />
have followed the “Industry good practice guidelines”<br />
have on the whole provided more comprehensive<br />
and understandable information.<br />
It was also observed that Pillar 3 disclosures are<br />
somewhat heterogeneous notably as regards their<br />
presentation, timeframe and format, and the nature of the<br />
data disclosed. Some of those differences may relate to<br />
the non-prescriptive approach retained by the CRD and<br />
the Member States, which may raise comparability issues<br />
for users.<br />
It is expected that market discipline will help to reduce<br />
the heterogeneity observed during this first year of the<br />
implementation of Pillar 3.<br />
NEXT STEPS<br />
In 2010 CEBS will renew its assessment exercise<br />
on Pillar 3 disclosures putting greater emphasis on<br />
the main weaknesses identified in the first exercise.<br />
The potential need for supervisory guidance will be<br />
considered on the basis of this new assessment.<br />
CEBS will also consider promoting convergence by<br />
highlighting best practices.<br />
4.3.3<br />
Towards a Single<br />
<strong>Report</strong>ing Framework<br />
In 2007, CEBS published a study assessing the level of<br />
convergence in the application of the CEBS Guidelines<br />
on <strong>Report</strong>ing (COREP and FINREP) 55 . The results of<br />
the study demonstrated that more work was needed<br />
in the medium term to achieve greater convergence in<br />
supervisory reporting, at least for institutions that operate<br />
cross-border within the EU. To that end, a road-map<br />
pointing towards more standardised supervisory reporting<br />
was developed. Several projects on streamlining and<br />
harmonising reporting formats have been launched that<br />
will allow CEBS to deliver EU-wide reporting formats for<br />
FINREP and COREP, consistent with the request of the<br />
EU Institutions.<br />
The scope of the deliverables is as follows:<br />
• Consolidated and sub-consolidated financial<br />
reporting for supervisory purposes based on IAS/<br />
IFRS as endorsed by the <strong>European</strong> Union. These<br />
reports are covered by the Guidelines on Financial<br />
<strong>Report</strong>ing.<br />
• Consolidated, sub-consolidated and solo reporting<br />
of the capital requirements and own funds based<br />
on Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC. These<br />
reports are based on the Guidelines on Common<br />
<strong>Report</strong>ing.<br />
To achieve a high level of harmonization and strong<br />
convergence in regular supervisory reporting<br />
requirements, CEBS decided to revise its current<br />
guidelines on COREP and FINREP with the aim of<br />
developing a supervisory reporting model with common<br />
data definitions.<br />
Though the use of XBRL for reporting purposes is not<br />
mandatory for the national authorities, CEBS will continue<br />
to recommend it, as the adoption of XBRL taxonomies will<br />
lead to greater harmonization of IT formats.<br />
55 Assessment of convergence in supervisory reporting: http://www.c-ebs.org/getdoc/97aced1d-0c74-4692-bbff-<br />
30efa5bbc1f2/20071008Assessmentofconvergenceinsupervisoryreport.aspx<br />
54 As reflected in Chapter 5 (“Disclosures by credit institutions”) of Title V of Directive 2006/48/EC and in Annex XII (“Technical criteria on Disclosure”)