11.11.2014 Views

Michigan Judges Guide to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

Michigan Judges Guide to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

Michigan Judges Guide to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7. MISCELLANEOUS PROTECTIONS<br />

7.1. Tax Protections<br />

7.1.1. Residency for Tax Purposes<br />

A servicemember does not lose or acquire residency status for tax<br />

purposes due <strong>to</strong> his/her presence in a state for compliance with military<br />

orders. 149 Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, military compensation is not “income” for state<br />

tax purposes in a state where <strong>the</strong> servicemember is a non-resident. 150<br />

Similarly, for tax purposes, a servicemember’s personal property is not<br />

deemed <strong>to</strong> be located in a state where <strong>the</strong> servicemember is a nonresident.<br />

151<br />

7.1.2. Property Tax<br />

The <strong>Act</strong> provides relief <strong>to</strong> servicemembers from tax assessments that fall<br />

due and remain unpaid before or during military service. 152 This<br />

protection applies <strong>to</strong> taxes for personal property and real property acquired<br />

for dwelling, professional, business or agricultural purposes by a<br />

servicemember or <strong>the</strong> servicemember’s dependents or employees. 153 It<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r prevents assessment of any additional penalties or interest above<br />

6% for <strong>the</strong> nonpayment. 154<br />

7.1.3. Limitation on Sale of Property <strong>to</strong> Enforce Tax Assessment<br />

Qualifying property cannot be sold <strong>to</strong> enforce <strong>the</strong> collection of a tax or<br />

assessment, unless by court order and upon <strong>the</strong> court’s determination that<br />

149 Id. at § 571(a).<br />

150 Id. at § 571(b). But see, US v State of Kan, 580 F Supp 512 (DC Kan, 1984) (recognizing that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong><br />

prohibits <strong>the</strong> use of military compensation as taxable “income” for nonresidents, yet holding that it may be<br />

considered in a formula <strong>to</strong> determine <strong>the</strong> rate of taxation for state income of nonresidents), aff’d, 810 F2d 935 (10 th<br />

Cir 1987).<br />

151 50 USC App § 571(c); Dameron v Brodhead, 345 US 322; 73 S Ct 721; 97 L Ed 1041 (1953) (holding<br />

that an Army officer’s personal property could not be taxed by Colorado for <strong>the</strong> time he was in <strong>the</strong> state while<br />

assigned <strong>to</strong> military duty, because he was domiciled in Louisiana).<br />

152 50 USC App § 561(a).<br />

153 Id. But see, Farran v Wayne County, No 261185, 2005 WL 2219417 (Mich App, 2005) (finding that<br />

50 USC App §561 does not apply <strong>to</strong> vacant land, because it is not occupied for dwelling, professional, business, or<br />

agricultural purposes as required under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>).<br />

154 50 USC App § 561(d).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!