Master Cannulator Program - The Renal Network

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Did it Work? Staff went to other staff to ask for help rather than to the nurse Staff chose who to ask to recannulate the patient 1. “I know I can do this” 2. “<strong>The</strong> nurse was busy” 3. “So and so stuck her last time” 4. “She wanted so and so to stick her”
Result: Still 1. Many infiltrations and misses. 2. Certain staff were always requested to cannulate and lost their patient care time. 3. I still heard “no-one can stick it?” yet one or two staff always did. 4. Accesses were frequently “rested”, PCs were left in longer. 5. AVFs and AVGs were referred back to surgeons/for fistulagrams, just for us to hear “there is nothing wrong”
Page 1 and 2: Cannulation Team DSI Marion County
Page 3 and 4: FF-Our Story 11 Change Concepts Jul
Page 5 and 6: Data Current patients in that mont
Page 7 and 8: Data May 2009-39.3% of 61 current
Page 9 and 10: Oct. 2007, Letter sent to surgeons
Page 11 and 12: Fall 2008 It was decided, in CQI,
Page 13 and 14: “NIMAT” at Indiana Kidney Insti
Page 15 and 16: July 2007 Patient Education (again
Page 17 and 18: Are we getting anywhere? FRUSTRATIO
Page 19 and 20: How to Begin Recognize there is a
Page 21: Set a Goal Minimize the amount of
Page 25 and 26: Process/Compare Results DATA-compa
Page 27 and 28: Cannulation Skill Tool
Page 29 and 30: Plan #2 Appoint one person to eval
Page 31 and 32: Consequently The idea for the Cann
Page 33 and 34: Corrective Action Still some resis
Page 35 and 36: Access Initiation Tool DSI Guideli
Page 37 and 38: DATA #4 new accesses (AVFs) since 1
Page 39 and 40: Re-evaluation of Team On-going pro
Page 41: Have We Improved? Mar 08-Mar 09 AVF

Master Cannulator Program - The Renal Network

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?