14.11.2014 Views

Sig-Debit Card

Sig-Debit Card

Sig-Debit Card

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Commoditization of Bank<br />

Networks: Havoc or Hope?<br />

NACHA Payments 2008<br />

May 20, Las Vegas<br />

Steve Mott, Principal— BetterBuyDesign<br />

1


Key Takeaways<br />

1. Networks have come to mean different things for<br />

different generations of consumers<br />

2. Mounting forces are turning once­sacrosanct bank<br />

networks into open platforms for innovation<br />

3. Examples of commoditization spring directly from<br />

exploitation of common networks (especially the ACH)<br />

4. Private network options lessen banks’degrees of<br />

freedom and security<br />

5. Decoupled <strong>Debit</strong> poses a paradigm shift<br />

6. At the bottom of much of this change lies the ACH and<br />

EFT networks, which ironically are working to increase<br />

network value<br />

7. Quandary is how/where FIs will benefit in the new<br />

paradigm<br />

2


1. Physical to Social Network Transition<br />

3


Facebook: New Home for Digital Transacting<br />

4


Second Life: Banks, Currency, even Scams<br />

5


Social Networks Redefine Lending<br />

6


2. Sweeping Forces Changing<br />

Payments Network Marketplace<br />

• Massive transition to electronic payments puts<br />

everything into play<br />

• Needs and ways to access DDAs proliferate<br />

• Mounting challenges to credit cards<br />

– Industry maturing<br />

– Too many eating off the food chain<br />

– Too few make the money<br />

– Customer reach extends too far<br />

– <strong>Card</strong> economics get out of whack<br />

– Success in priming the pump lessens<br />

– Emerging markets underserved<br />

– Alternative solutions gain traction<br />

• Redefinition of debit cards risks the ‘franchise’…<br />

7


Major Shifts in Channels/Types Underway<br />

250<br />

Payment Volume by Product (Bil. Txns.)<br />

200<br />

150<br />

Stored Value<br />

PreAuth<br />

ElectBenXfer<br />

Remote/Internet<br />

PIN­debit<br />

100<br />

<strong>Sig</strong>­debit<br />

Credit <strong>Card</strong>s<br />

50<br />

Cash<br />

0<br />

Checks<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />

Sources: Nilson Report (2004­2010); BBD projections<br />

8


The Consumer DDA: A Payments Portfolio<br />

Methods of DDA Payments (Mil. Txns.)<br />

90,000<br />

80,000<br />

70,000<br />

60,000<br />

50,000<br />

40,000<br />

30,000<br />

20,000<br />

10,000<br />

Transfers<br />

SV/Other<br />

e<strong>Debit</strong><br />

POS<strong>Debit</strong><br />

<strong>Sig</strong>­<strong>Debit</strong><br />

PIN<br />

Image Exchange<br />

IRD<br />

Paper<br />

ACH<br />

0<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Sources: NACHA, JPMChase, WellsFargo, McKinsey & Co., Nilson Report; BBD Estimates<br />

9


CapOne: The Industry is Maturing<br />

10


<strong>Card</strong> Solicitations— Bottom Fishing?<br />

.05/.06<br />

11


The Expanded Credit <strong>Card</strong> Food Chain<br />

Source: Georgetown Law Center<br />

12


Too Few Participants Make the Money<br />

Graphic provided by: Assoc. Prof. Adam Levitin, Georgetown Law Center<br />

13


Charge­Offs: Reaching Too Far…<br />

Visa/Master<strong>Card</strong> Fraud vs. Non­fraud Charge­offs ($ mil.)<br />

$40,000<br />

$35,000<br />

$30,000<br />

$25,000<br />

$20,000<br />

$15,000<br />

Non­fraud<br />

Fraud<br />

$10,000<br />

$5,000<br />

$0<br />

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007e<br />

Sources: Nilson Report, industry publications, BBD estimates<br />

14


Economics of Bank <strong>Card</strong> Use<br />

Credit $8.16<br />

<strong>Sig</strong>­<strong>Debit</strong> $2.16<br />

PIN­debit $.26<br />

Sources: <strong>Card</strong>s & Payments Magazine, ATM <strong>Debit</strong> News, BBD estimates<br />

15


Sources of Credit <strong>Card</strong> Revenue<br />

<strong>Card</strong> Revenue per transaction<br />

$9.00<br />

$8.00<br />

$7.00<br />

$6.00<br />

$5.00<br />

Enhancements<br />

Total: $8.16<br />

Interchange<br />

Annual fees<br />

Cash­Advance<br />

Penalty fees<br />

$4.00<br />

$3.00<br />

$2.00<br />

Interest<br />

$1.00<br />

$0.00<br />

Credit <strong>Card</strong><br />

Source: <strong>Card</strong>s & Payments Magazine, 5/2007, plus BBD projections<br />

16


Source of <strong>Sig</strong>­<strong>Debit</strong> <strong>Card</strong> Revenue<br />

<strong>Card</strong> Revenue per transaction<br />

$2.50<br />

Total: $2.16<br />

$2.00<br />

Interchange<br />

$1.50<br />

Other fees<br />

$1.00<br />

NSFs/<br />

Penalty<br />

Fees<br />

$0.50<br />

$0.00<br />

"Interest"<br />

<strong>Sig</strong>­debit <strong>Card</strong><br />

Source: BBD client data<br />

17


Source of PIN­<strong>Debit</strong> <strong>Card</strong> Revenue<br />

<strong>Card</strong> Revenue per transaction<br />

$0.30<br />

$0.25<br />

Total: $.258<br />

$0.20<br />

$0.15<br />

Interchange<br />

$0.10<br />

$0.05<br />

$0.00<br />

Other fees<br />

NSFs/Penalty<br />

Fees<br />

PIN­debit card<br />

Sources: Nilson Reports, industry publications, plus BBD client data<br />

18


Is the Bloom Off Rewards <strong>Card</strong>s?<br />

•80% of credit card<br />

offers today carry<br />

rewards;<br />

•71% of sig­debit<br />

issuers offer rewards<br />

•83% of consumers<br />

who have them use<br />

them as primary card<br />

Sources: <strong>Card</strong>Trak, Edgar Dunn/TransUnion, Celent; Financial Insights<br />

19


Emerging Needs Inexpertly Addressed<br />

20


Alternative Payments Gain Traction<br />

21


Consumers Shift to <strong>Debit</strong>, but at a cost…<br />

A new study has found that more consumers prefer debit cards<br />

than any other type of payment for point­of­sale purchases. This is<br />

the first time in the study's history that debit cards exceeded all<br />

other payment devices as the overall preferred payment product.<br />

The "Payment Dynamics 2007 Preferred Payments Study" from<br />

TransUnion and Edgar, Dunn & Company found that 29% of<br />

respondents prefer debit cards versus 26% for credit cards. This<br />

year's study shows fewer consumers are adding payment<br />

products to their wallets and more consumers are eliminating<br />

products from their wallets than in prior years' studies. Only<br />

31% of respondents added a new payment device to their wallet<br />

this past year versus 56% in 2004, while 20% of consumers said<br />

they shed payment products compared to 16% in 2004. The study<br />

also showed that rewards credit cards represent 50% of all<br />

preferred credit cards with 83% of rewards card owners using their<br />

reward credit card<br />

<strong>Debit</strong> <strong>Card</strong> Overdraft Costs $2 for Every Dollar Borrowed; Banks Get $53B in Fees<br />

•More banks are allowing customers to overdraw with debit card purchases and at ATMs, then hitting them with fees of up to $35,<br />

according to the Center for Responsible Lending.<br />

•The average fee for overdrawing your account, by check or debit, reached a record high of $27.40 last year, up 11% from five years<br />

before, according to Bankrate.com, reports USA Today..<br />

•In 2006, financial institutions earned $53 billion in overdraft fees, a 58% increase from 2001, estimates consultant Moebs Services.<br />

•Consumers are not happy. In a survey conducted by the Center for Responsible Lending, 61% of consumers who had a preference<br />

said they would want to have their bank deny a debit card transaction — rather than approve it and charge a fee — if it will overdraw the<br />

account.<br />

•Making an in­store debit card purchase is by far the most expensive way to overdraft, costing $2.17 for every dollar borrowed. By<br />

comparison, check­triggered overdraft loans cost $0.86 per dollar borrowed, according to the report.<br />

22


3. Commoditization from Within<br />

• Added value for Merchants<br />

dissolves value of network<br />

• PayPal emerges as 800­lb.<br />

gorilla in eCommerce<br />

– Friendlier merchant proposition<br />

– Friendlier consumer proposition<br />

– Solves security issues easily<br />

– Business model makes GOOD money!<br />

23


PayPal: Adoption Exemplar<br />

24


Lots of Ways to Transact<br />

25


Merchant Adoption is Surging<br />

26


Instant Credit and High Interest on Deposits<br />

27


PayPal Plug­in: MC­level Acceptance<br />

28


Redirection from Merchant to PayPal site<br />

29


Instant Credit as Needed (with backup)<br />

30


PayPal Plug­in Offers Universal Payment<br />

31


A Separate Log­in is Required to PayPal<br />

32


A One­time Number is Generated<br />

33


It Works (and Generates Receipts)!<br />

34


Business Model Arbitrages Bank Networks<br />

35


Margins Continue to Grow<br />

36


4. Merchant­Based Hybrid Networks<br />

• Prepaid reload networks spawning<br />

• Collaborating merchants experimenting<br />

• Wal­Mart joins the fray<br />

37


Reloadable Prepaid <strong>Card</strong> Market Grows<br />

Source: Digital Transactions Magazine, 3/08<br />

38


Restricted Authorization Networks Emerge<br />

39


Wal­Mart Immersed in <strong>Card</strong> Business<br />

40


Credit <strong>Card</strong> Uses Hybrid Networks<br />

41


Prepaid ‘Money<strong>Card</strong>’Uses 3 Networks<br />

42


Revolution <strong>Card</strong> Tries to Change Paradigm<br />

43


New Value Proposition Leverages PIN<br />

Consumer Value Proposition<br />

The Revolution<strong>Card</strong> is different than other<br />

credit cards.<br />

Not only is it designed to be flexible, but<br />

we're constantly adding new features.<br />

• Credit card with flexible features<br />

• PIN­based for greater control and security<br />

• Instant rewards through merchant partners<br />

• Competitive APRs<br />

Revolution<strong>Card</strong> is a PIN­based credit card.<br />

If your card is lost or stolen, any<br />

unauthorized user must know your PIN to<br />

make purchases. And you can change your<br />

PIN as often as you like.<br />

Revolution<strong>Card</strong> is not embossed.<br />

You won't find your name or account<br />

number anywhere on it­­and neither will<br />

anyone else.<br />

• No physical data is stored on the card.<br />

• Limits identity theft<br />

• Reduces fraudulent charges<br />

• Lowers risk if card is lost or stolen<br />

Merchant Value Proposition<br />

Welcome to Revolution<strong>Card</strong> for Merchants<br />

• The new direction of credit cards. And a whole new<br />

payment platform designed for the way you do<br />

business.<br />

• Revolution<strong>Card</strong> works just like the traditional credit<br />

cards you're used to. With one big difference: No<br />

interchange fees. Which means you keep more of<br />

your profits with every sale.<br />

Revolution<strong>Card</strong>:<br />

• Eliminates interchange fees.<br />

– Save on every transaction.<br />

– Increase your profit margins.<br />

– Reduce your credit card fees by up to 80%.<br />

• Maintains a more secure environment.<br />

– A more reliable, faster, and highly secure environment<br />

for transaction processing.<br />

– <strong>Sig</strong>nificantly reduces transaction disputes.<br />

– PIN­based system virtually eliminates unauthorized<br />

transactions.<br />

• Amplifies marketing campaigns.<br />

– Launch co­marketing programs.<br />

– Enhance your existing rewards and loyalty programs.<br />

– Lower your customer acquisition costs and boost<br />

customer spend<br />

Source: Revolution <strong>Card</strong> website<br />

44


A Better Mousetrap for Digital Era?<br />

45


HSBC’s Tempo (formerly <strong>Debit</strong>man) Grows<br />

46


‘Network­in­a­Box’(via ACH) Arrives<br />

47


5. Decoupled <strong>Debit</strong>: Eating from Within?<br />

48


Decoupled <strong>Debit</strong>— An Overview<br />

49


Decoupled <strong>Debit</strong>’s Impact on Rewards<br />

• "Incumbent deposit institutions will need to react to the risk of<br />

disintermediation as their business model, which is based on<br />

punitive fees and interchange income, comes under pressure,"<br />

says Gwenn Bézard, research director at Aite Group and author<br />

of the report. "Decoupled debit cards will also expose Visa,<br />

Master<strong>Card</strong>, and incumbent EFT networks to new competition<br />

from the likes of American Express and Discover in the debit<br />

arena," predicts Bézard. Aite Group anticipates that competition<br />

on rewards will force major financial institutions to accelerate<br />

their shift to enterprise rewards to resist consumers' cherrypicking<br />

of the debit card product.<br />

• Paul Grill, a partner of First Annapolis Consulting in Linthicum,<br />

Md., agrees. “Capital One is a great marketer, and this product<br />

is going to put pressure on banks to offer much better debit card<br />

rewards.”<br />

Sources: Aite Group, Transaction Trends<br />

50


CapOne Projected Rewards Level<br />

Positioning<br />

Source: Aite Group<br />

51


Consumer Adoption Issues?<br />

• “This is an industry shaker, but consumers are fickle and<br />

it could be difficult for them to break out of the traditional<br />

debit card model,”Pamela Hayward, Mercator<br />

• “Will consumers go through the extra steps to enroll in<br />

the program? Are merchant­oriented rewards enough to<br />

drive sufficient transaction volume (or even initial uptake)<br />

to make for a successful product? I think the immediate<br />

success of the product is suspect, but I suppose it<br />

depends on how Cap One is defining that success.”<br />

Bruce Cundiff, Javelin<br />

Sources: Mercator, Transaction Trends<br />

52


Decoupled <strong>Debit</strong>: Posing Risks<br />

• While decoupled debit offers monoline issuers another avenue<br />

by which to gain customers, notes Dan Schutzer, executive director<br />

of the Financial Services Technology Consortium (FSTC) in New<br />

York, it could be a huge threat to banks' deposit business.<br />

"Decoupled debit allows a bank or non­bank to issue a debit card<br />

against a DDA the issuer of the card doesn't have," he explains.<br />

• However, the risks are even greater for banks that are not involved<br />

in the decoupled debit game, notes the FSTC's Schutzer. The DDA<br />

bank is going to lose a source of revenue, he stresses. "Now you<br />

have an ACH­based debit card and that fee income is taken away<br />

from the DDA bank," Schutzer comments. "The DDA doesn't die,<br />

but it loses its profitability."<br />

• "The fear of the unknown is palpable in the financial services<br />

industry with the uncertainty of how the decoupled debit platform will<br />

affect the competitive balance of interchange and consumer loyalty<br />

within today's traditional debit card model,”says Patty Hayward,<br />

Senior Analyst of the <strong>Debit</strong> Advisory Service for Mercator Advisory<br />

Group<br />

Sources: Bank Systems & Technology, 9/2007; Mercator<br />

53


PayPal’s Virtual <strong>Debit</strong> <strong>Card</strong>­Millions Tried it<br />

54


HSBC’s OptiPay program via Tempo<br />

Network Qualifies<br />

55


6. Current Sources: ACH and the EFTs<br />

56


ACH Already Dominates Bill Payment<br />

ACH <strong>Debit</strong> Payment Types (Mil. Txns.)<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

PPD (auto­pay)<br />

ARC (lockbox)<br />

WEB (online)<br />

TEL (phone)<br />

BOC (retail)<br />

POP (retail)<br />

0<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Source: NACHA, BBD projections<br />

57


BillPay Shifts Favor ACH/PINless <strong>Debit</strong><br />

Bill Payment Shifts by Payment Types<br />

$.35­.50<br />

Percent of total annual bill pay transactions<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

0.1% 0.3% 0.6%<br />

2.7%<br />

4.8%<br />

20.6%<br />

5.0%<br />

1.7%<br />

65.1%<br />

3.3%<br />

5.6%<br />

22.7%<br />

4.8%<br />

1.6%<br />

61.7%<br />

4.1% 4.9% 5.9%<br />

6.7%<br />

7.6%<br />

8.7%<br />

24.9%<br />

4.7%<br />

1.5%<br />

57.6%<br />

1.2% 2.1% 3.3%<br />

26.7%<br />

4.6%<br />

1.4%<br />

53.5%<br />

28.7%<br />

4.4%<br />

1.3%<br />

48.9%<br />

6.9%<br />

9.9%<br />

30.9%<br />

4.3%<br />

1.1%<br />

43.6%<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

$.01­$.02<br />

Paper Checks Money Orders Cash ACH Credit <strong>Card</strong> <strong>Debit</strong> <strong>Card</strong> PINless <strong>Debit</strong><br />

Source: TowerGroup, Celent, Aite Group, BBD projections 2006<br />

58


PIN­debit Online: Issuers Can Profit!<br />

Online<br />

Bankcard<br />

Payment Type<br />

Credit <strong>Card</strong><br />

<strong>Sig</strong>­<strong>Debit</strong> <strong>Card</strong><br />

PIN­debit <strong>Card</strong><br />

@ 1.5%<br />

PIN­debit <strong>Card</strong><br />

@ 1.25%<br />

PIN­debit <strong>Card</strong><br />

@ 1.0%<br />

PIN­debit <strong>Card</strong><br />

@ 0.75%<br />

PIN­debit <strong>Card</strong><br />

@ 0.50%<br />

Net Issuer<br />

Profit<br />

$.95<br />

$.62<br />

$.97<br />

$.82<br />

$.66<br />

$.51<br />

$.35<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Real­time <strong>Debit</strong> (mil.txns.) (@PIN­debt @<br />

75bps and 125bps vs. Other RTD @125 bps.)<br />

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />

PIN­debit @ 125 bps. Extra @ 75 bps. Other RTD @ 125 bps.<br />

% of<br />

Mkt.<br />

6%<br />

8%<br />

10%<br />

59


Remote Capture, from Anywhere!<br />

Remote Capture Image Streams (Mil.Txns.)<br />

6,000<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

Small Retailer<br />

Large Retailer<br />

ATM<br />

Branch<br />

Vault/Lockbox<br />

Large Corp.<br />

0<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Source: Mitek; BBD Research and Projections<br />

60


SVP: Attempts to Recapture Network Value<br />

61


7. Who Profits From Commoditization?<br />

• Handicapping the product providers and markets, and<br />

speculating on potential winners and losers<br />

• Understanding the consequences of all the recent<br />

financial restructuring on the industry<br />

• Assessing the relative impact of all these changes on FI<br />

bottom­lines<br />

• Evaluating which strategic options offer their best<br />

business prospects for the future<br />

• Considering a quantitative framework for projecting<br />

payment revenues and incomes over the next ten years<br />

62


The Issuers Controlling the <strong>Card</strong> Business<br />

Graphic provided by: Assoc. Prof. Adam Levitin, Georgetown Law Center<br />

63


Impact of the Master<strong>Card</strong>/Visa IPOs<br />

• MC stakes early claim (PayPal, CapOne, etc.)<br />

• Visa deals with big merchants<br />

• Both focus on transaction growth (their<br />

sustaining business model)<br />

• Less need/pressure to prop up big­bank profits<br />

(e.g., will Interlink permit PINless debit billpay?)<br />

• Big question is which one will dominate debit<br />

cards worldwide (and who gets STAR?)<br />

• New tech (e.g., contactless) needs different<br />

business model than sig­debit<br />

64


Reconstitution of the Processor Business<br />

• FD as a private company<br />

• Paymentech split­up looming<br />

• New, sleek niche­processors emerge<br />

• Interchange balance likely to shift toward<br />

processors’take as rates drop and products are<br />

redefined<br />

• Risk management is up­for­grabs<br />

• Mag­stripe era coming to a close<br />

65


How/Where do FIs Participate?<br />

• Critical mass volume less critical as networks become<br />

more commoditized<br />

• Customer relationship value/requirements become<br />

paramount (pricing premium based on value replaces<br />

punitive fees and interest)<br />

• Need to manage credit, risk and transaction movements<br />

across a dozen points of access and multiple channels<br />

• Cooperation with merchants/billers can make a<br />

difference in bottom­lines<br />

• DDAs are the best source of leverage now (but won’t<br />

stay that way as the concept of debit cards and accounts<br />

become commoditized)<br />

66


FI Perspective: Prisoner’s Dilemma<br />

67


Steve Mott’s Contact Coordinates<br />

0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0<br />

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1<br />

0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0<br />

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1<br />

0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0<br />

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1<br />

0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0<br />

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1<br />

0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0<br />

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1<br />

0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0<br />

Steve Mott<br />

BetterBuyDesign<br />

dba CSI Management Services, Inc.<br />

1386 Long Ridge Road<br />

Stamford, CT 06903<br />

(o) 203.968.1967<br />

(f) 203.322.1012<br />

(c) 203­536.0588<br />

email: stevemottusa@yahoo.com<br />

website:www.betterbuydesign.com<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!