14.11.2014 Views

September 28, 2012 - Texas Health Insurance Risk Pool

September 28, 2012 - Texas Health Insurance Risk Pool

September 28, 2012 - Texas Health Insurance Risk Pool

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong><br />

Board of Directors Meeting<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong><br />

The meeting of the Board of Directors of the <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> was held Friday, <strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>,<br />

<strong>2012</strong> at 4140 Governor’s Row, Room Southpark A, Austin, <strong>Texas</strong>. Notice of the meeting was filed<br />

electronically with the Secretary of State’s office on Wednesday, <strong>September</strong> 19, <strong>2012</strong> and published<br />

immediately on the <strong>Texas</strong> Register web site (TRD#<strong>2012</strong>006540).<br />

Board members present: Gary Cole, Chair; Rick Ott, Vice-Chair; Greg Barbutti, Secretary/Treasurer;<br />

Robert Emmick, M.D.; Pati McCandless; Maureen Milligan, Ph.D.; Vicky Paparelli, APRN; and Bill<br />

Rainey, M.D. Marinan Williams was unable to attend. Steven Browning, <strong>Pool</strong> Executive Director, Denise<br />

Haidet, <strong>Pool</strong> Office Manager, and Betty DeLargy, General Counsel to the <strong>Pool</strong>, were also in attendance.<br />

Meeting Called to Order<br />

With a quorum of the Board present, Chairman Cole called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m.<br />

I. Approval of Minutes<br />

Dr. Rainey moved to approve the minutes of the May 24, <strong>2012</strong> Board of Directors meeting.<br />

The motion was seconded by Dr. Emmick and unanimously approved.<br />

II.<br />

Financial Report<br />

Mr. Browning presented the <strong>Pool</strong>’s unaudited monthly financial reports for the period April through July<br />

<strong>2012</strong>. All assessments invoiced in June have been collected. The <strong>Pool</strong>’s $61 million net loss through July<br />

is nearly twice the deficit for the same period last year. This ±$30 million deviation from July 2011 results<br />

is due to: $10 million less in premium collections, attributable to lower enrollment and member selection of<br />

higher deductible plans; $9 million increase in medical claims; $5 million increase in pharmacy claims; and<br />

$7 million higher year-to-date reserve adjustments.<br />

After further discussion, Dr. Emmick moved to approve the April, May, June, and July <strong>2012</strong> Financial<br />

Statements. The motion was seconded by Mr. Barbutti and unanimously approved.<br />

Mr. Browning reviewed the mid-year Budget vs. Actual expense report, which reflects a +$1<strong>28</strong>,000 overall<br />

favorable variance through July, due largely to lower-than-projected legal and actuarial services fees. He<br />

anticipates that the variance will narrow by year-end, but the budget is in very good shape at this point in<br />

time.<br />

Mr. Browning presented the TDI statement filing, which is a reformatted version of previously approved<br />

<strong>Pool</strong> financial statements. After further discussion, Mr. Ott moved to ratify the TDI 2 nd Quarter <strong>2012</strong><br />

Statement. The motion was seconded by Dr. Rainey and unanimously approved.<br />

Mr. Browning presented the <strong>Pool</strong>’s investments report, as of <strong>September</strong> 17, <strong>2012</strong>. Excess <strong>Pool</strong> funds were<br />

invested in government money market funds and a FNMA repurchase note. Mr. Browning noted that<br />

periodically during the month, as premiums are collected, investment amounts by category may temporarily<br />

exceed internal concentration of risk targets.<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> Board of Directors<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> Meeting Minutes<br />

Approved February 1, 2013<br />

Page 1 of 8


III.<br />

Executive Director’s Report<br />

Mr. Browning presented the Board of Directors Summary key metrics report, with updated results through<br />

July <strong>2012</strong>. Comparing YTD<strong>2012</strong> to the same period last year, the average premium per member per month<br />

(PMPM) increased only 2%, to $713. In contrast, claims expense PMPM increased 24%, to $1048. As<br />

<strong>Pool</strong> enrollment declines, enrollees with higher claim costs are remaining in the <strong>Pool</strong>, applying upward<br />

pressure on the PMPM claims figure. Application volumes continue to drop. Mr. Browning reported that<br />

the <strong>Pool</strong> is losing a net ±150 members monthly, due largely to an increasing number of members attaining<br />

age 65. In the last three months alone, the <strong>Pool</strong> lost 600 members because they turned 65. Upward<br />

deductible migration continues, with 25% of <strong>Pool</strong> policyholders now enrolled in the $7,500 plan.<br />

Mr. Browning reviewed the updated timeline and noted that the 83 rd legislative session begins January 8,<br />

2013. Discussion ensued about the best timing for the possible filing of a bill to revise the <strong>Pool</strong> statute to<br />

reflect changes required by the Affordable Care Act. Ms. McCandless suggested filing the bill as early as<br />

possible, certainly by January.<br />

Mr. Browning provided an update for the low-income premium subsidy program, and discussed the chart<br />

that tracks penalty collections and enrollment in the program. Since March of this year, premium subsidy<br />

applications have been mailed on a weekly basis to new enrollees, immediately after their enrollment in the<br />

<strong>Pool</strong>. This process puts the subsidy application into new enrollees’ hands within ±10 days of <strong>Pool</strong><br />

enrollment. In addition, a copy of the subsidy application was posted to the <strong>Pool</strong> website, and is inserted<br />

into each mailed <strong>Pool</strong> application packet, so that <strong>Pool</strong> applicants can prequalify their eligibility for the<br />

subsidy program. Prompt pay penalty amounts remitted by the carriers still vary widely, but have increased<br />

to a monthly average of $1.4 million this year, with a couple of large carriers accounting for the increased<br />

penalty volume.<br />

Mr. Browning presented a rolling two-month customer service report, prepared by Blue Cross Blue Shield<br />

of <strong>Texas</strong> (BCBSTX), that provides a weekly update of key service categories, including speed of answer,<br />

claim processing, and application volumes.<br />

IV.<br />

Board Issues and Administrative Matters<br />

Mr. Browning presented the recommendations of the joint Benefits Review & Y2014 Planning Work<br />

Group, which met several times. The group was comprised of Mr. Barbutti, Mr. Cole, Ms. McCandless,<br />

and Ms. Milligan. The Group’s final recommendations for Board approval are as follows:<br />

1) Deductible Reduction Opportunity: This item is an administrative recommendation to allow an open<br />

enrollment period later this year for members to elect a lower deductible plan. This opportunity was last<br />

offered by the Board in 2006, when ±300 <strong>Pool</strong> members elected to lower their deductibles. Because<br />

financial circumstances change over time, the <strong>Pool</strong> receives periodic requests from members to lower their<br />

deductibles. Milliman priced the cost of the exception, and concluded there would be minimal impact on<br />

the <strong>Pool</strong>’s annual net loss, likely no more than ±$200,000. If approved, the election period would run from<br />

November through year-end, with a January 1, 2013 effective date. Members who elect to lower deductible<br />

during this option period must remain in that lower deductible, higher premium plan throughout Y2013.<br />

2) Revision to Claim Filing Deadline: The Work Group spent time discussing possible discontinuation of<br />

<strong>Pool</strong> operations, and the importance of compressing timelines for claim and lawsuit filings, so that<br />

dissolution could occur in a reasonable time frame. The <strong>Pool</strong> policy currently allows members to file<br />

claims up to one year plus 90 days after the date of service, but with an incompetency clause that is<br />

completely open-ended. The Work Group recommends shortening the claim filing deadline to one year<br />

after the incurred service date and eliminating the open-ended incompetency clause. Providers, who file the<br />

majority of claims, already submit a very high percentage of claims within a short time frame. The<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> Board of Directors<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> Meeting Minutes<br />

Approved February 1, 2013<br />

Page 2 of 8


proposed change would still provide a reasonable time period to file.<br />

3) Revision to Legal Actions Deadline: The Work Group also discussed the <strong>Pool</strong>’s lawsuit filing deadline.<br />

The current policy provision allows filing of a legal action against the <strong>Pool</strong> up to three years after a claim is<br />

denied. The recommendation is to shorten the <strong>Pool</strong>’s legal action filing deadline to correspond to <strong>Texas</strong><br />

contract law, which requires a minimum of two years after the date a cause of action arises. This<br />

compressed time frame would still provide a reasonable period of time for a legal action filing. Mr.<br />

Browning observed that, until the claim and lawsuit filing provisions are revised, the potential for a much<br />

later filed suit could extend the period of <strong>Pool</strong> run-out; reasonable compression of the time frames will<br />

expedite the future dissolution process. Discussion ensued about the likelihood that, even with these<br />

revisions, there could be some sort of final public notice to provide a definite cut-off date for all claims and<br />

causes of action against the <strong>Pool</strong>.<br />

After further discussion, Ms. McCandless moved to approve the Work Group’s recommendation to<br />

allow enrollees to lower their deductibles, as an administrative exception to the <strong>Pool</strong> policy, during an<br />

election period ending 12/31/<strong>2012</strong>. The reduction would be effective 1/1/2013, and those electing to<br />

lower their deductibles would not be permitted to increase their deductibles during 2013. Dr.<br />

Emmick seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved.<br />

After further discussion, Dr. Emmick moved to approve the Work Group’s recommendations to: 1)<br />

require claim filing within one year of the incurred date and remove the incompetency clause; and 2)<br />

require legal actions to be filed within 2 years of the cause of action date. Both revisions are subject<br />

to Commissioner approval. Mr. Barbutti seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved.<br />

Mr. Browning presented the elements of a bill considered by the Work Group, which would be filed in the<br />

next legislative session to address the possible wind down of the <strong>Pool</strong>, assuming the Affordable Care Act is<br />

not repealed. Without repeal, availability of coverage in the individual health insurance market will be<br />

guaranteed, without medical underwriting, beginning January 1, 2014, and therefore it is anticipated that the<br />

<strong>Pool</strong> would discontinue new enrollment at that time.<br />

Another issue, likely to be addressed by the Legislature, is the date the <strong>Pool</strong> will terminate in-force policies.<br />

The open enrollment period for purchase of individual coverage through the Exchange is October 2013<br />

through March 2014; unless an individual qualifies for special enrollment, coverage is not available again<br />

until January 1, 2015. The <strong>Pool</strong> will need to educate its membership about the Exchange and the<br />

enrollment deadlines. There was discussion about the possibility of maintaining <strong>Pool</strong> coverage through<br />

2014 for members enrolled as of December 31, 2013, to mitigate some of the impact on premium rates of<br />

the transition of so many high-cost claimants into the commercial market. Extensive discussion ensued<br />

about the planning now taking place in other states regarding risk pools, and what may happen to premium<br />

rates in the individual health insurance market after December 31, 2013. Mr. Barbutti observed that he<br />

would want the <strong>Pool</strong> to either offer continued coverage to in-force enrollees throughout 2014 or,<br />

alternatively, cancel all coverage effective January 1, 2014, so that insureds do not face two deductibles<br />

within the same calendar year.<br />

After further discussion, Mr. Barbutti moved to recommend seeking legislative support for filing a bill<br />

during the 83 rd session, as generally outlined in the Work Group recommendation, to prepare for<br />

possible dissolution of the <strong>Pool</strong> in 2014. Mr. Ott seconded the motion and it was unanimously<br />

approved.<br />

Ms. Sue Hart presented Milliman’s financial projections for the <strong>Pool</strong>, which serve as the basis for<br />

developing carrier assessments. She noted that the projections cover a 15-month time period; therefore, a<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> Board of Directors<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> Meeting Minutes<br />

Approved February 1, 2013<br />

Page 3 of 8


wide range of assessment projection results are possible, varying from ±$140 million to ±$192 million,<br />

depending on the claim trend and enrollment assumptions applied. The mid-range estimate to maintain a<br />

positive cash balance through December 2013 is $165.1 million. To be conservative, no premium increases<br />

are assumed. Last year’s interim assessment was only $125.5 million, but in hindsight it should have been<br />

±$135 million to fully cover the <strong>Pool</strong>’s costs through the end of this year. Therefore, ±$10 million of the<br />

proposed $165.1 million interim amount is attributable to a shortfall in last year’s assessment amount.<br />

Further discussion ensued regarding cost trends anticipated next year.<br />

After further discussion, Mr. Barbutti moved to approve the Y<strong>2012</strong> Interim Assessment in the amount<br />

of $165.1 million. The assessment will be payable in two installments, with the first installment of<br />

$82,550,000 due within 30 days of the final invoice date and the remainder due six months thereafter.<br />

Dr. Emmick seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved.<br />

Mr. Browning noted that at each Fall meeting the Board authorizes him to obtain a line of credit, if required<br />

to maintain a positive cash balance before the assessments are collected. He estimates the <strong>Pool</strong> will have at<br />

least $5 million in cash on hand by the end of November, based on projected timing of claim payments.<br />

Therefore, he does not anticipate needing to draw funds under the line of credit, but agreed it is a good idea<br />

to have the authority in place as a backstop. After further discussion, Dr. Emmick moved to authorize the<br />

Executive Director to obtain up to a $7.5 million Line of Credit, if required to maintain a positive<br />

cash balance. The motion was seconded by Ms. Milligan and unanimously approved.<br />

Mr. Browning presented an update regarding the situation with the Walgreens pharmacy chain. As a<br />

reminder, he noted that, effective January 1, <strong>2012</strong>, Express Scripts (ESI) dropped Walgreens from its<br />

pharmacy network. In April, ESI acquired Medco. At the May meeting, the <strong>Pool</strong> Board voted to drop<br />

Walgreens from the <strong>Pool</strong>’s network effective <strong>September</strong> 1, unless “some agreement” was reached between<br />

Walgreens and ESI. The Board’s decision in May was fully consistent with the ESI corporate position at<br />

that time, and there was a strategic timing advantage to the proposed carve-out, which was estimated to<br />

save the <strong>Pool</strong> ±$1.6 million annually. But on July 19 th , ESI and Walgreens reached an agreement for<br />

Walgreens to rejoin the ESI network, effective <strong>September</strong> 15 th . At that point in July, the Walgreens<br />

termination notice, scheduled for release to nearly 7,000 <strong>Pool</strong> members, was pended, and the <strong>Pool</strong> awaited a<br />

decision from Walgreens about the <strong>Pool</strong>’s revised drug pricing. The May Board motion had been approved<br />

with the assumption that any agreement between ESI and Walgreens would improve the <strong>Pool</strong>’s pricing. In<br />

August, however, Walgreens informed the <strong>Pool</strong> that its drug pricing would not improve, despite the<br />

ESI/Walgreens agreement. In fact, the Walgreens pricing the <strong>Pool</strong> obtained previously through the existing<br />

legacy Medco contract was better than the new pricing Walgreens negotiated with ESI in July.<br />

Mr. Browning asked the ESI account team to confirm that a Walgreens carve-out decision, if reaffirmed<br />

today by the Board, could still be effectively communicated to <strong>Pool</strong> enrollees, at the same time that<br />

Walgreens pharmacies are advertising to bring back ESI customers, and ESI is educating our members that<br />

Medco is now ESI. The ESI staff confirmed that the carve-out, though more challenging, could still be<br />

effectively implemented. The updated analysis indicates that ±6,700 <strong>Pool</strong> members will be affected, but<br />

only ±50 will have to drive farther to find a network alternative. Some of these 6,700 are already using<br />

another pharmacy in addition to Walgreens; approximately 5,000 use Walgreens exclusively.<br />

The revised annual savings estimate for the carve-out is $1,436,000, which would be guaranteed through a<br />

contract amendment. Discussion ensued about the proposal to move ahead with the carve-out, despite the<br />

complexity created by the ESI/Walgreens agreement. Several board members indicated that the <strong>Pool</strong><br />

should proceed with the carve-out to improve the <strong>Pool</strong>’s drug pricing, particularly given the significant<br />

increase in the assessment. Mr. Alan Kellogg confirmed that transferring scripts to a new pharmacy is not<br />

difficult. The suggestion was made to send two notices to <strong>Pool</strong> members about the Walgreens carve-out<br />

before its effective date. Mr. Browning asked if the Board wanted to consider a motion that would rescind<br />

the carve-out if Walgreens offers an acceptable improvement in their drug pricing before the first member<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> Board of Directors<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> Meeting Minutes<br />

Approved February 1, 2013<br />

Page 4 of 8


notice letter is mailed. Consensus was reached, however, to move ahead without such a provision because<br />

Walgreens had already been given adequate time to respond. Several board members commented that<br />

health plan insureds are very accustomed to these types of changes with their coverage.<br />

After additional discussion, Dr. Rainey moved to authorize Express-Scripts to restrict the <strong>Pool</strong>’s<br />

pharmacy network to exclude Walgreens, effective January 1, 2013. The motion was seconded by<br />

Ms. Paparelli and unanimously approved.<br />

At 10:48 a.m. Mr. Cole announced a break. At 11:05 a.m. Mr. Cole brought the meeting back to order. Ms.<br />

Paparelli, who had previously informed Mr. Cole that she would have to leave the meeting early, departed<br />

during the break.<br />

Professional services contract proposals for 2013 were discussed and approved, as follows:<br />

• Mr. Barbutti moved to approve the 2013 Milliman actuarial services proposal. The motion<br />

was seconded by Dr. Emmick and unanimously approved.<br />

• Mr. Barbutti moved to approve Ms. DeLargy’s proposal for 2013 & 2014 legal services. The<br />

motion was seconded by Dr. Rainey, and approved, with Ms. McCandless abstaining.<br />

• Ms. McCandless moved to approve the <strong>Health</strong>LinX Y2013 pharmacy consulting services<br />

proposal. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ott and unanimously approved.<br />

• Dr. Rainey moved to approve the PBM Helin Donovan financial audit proposal for the year<br />

ending December 31, <strong>2012</strong>. The motion was seconded by Mr. Barbutti and unanimously<br />

approved.<br />

V. Third Party Administrator & Consultant Reports<br />

A. Report from MedWatch<br />

Ms. Sally-Ann Polson, President of MedWatch, presented her company’s report about the <strong>Pool</strong>’s disease<br />

management program. MedWatch targets participation of the 5% of <strong>Pool</strong> enrollees who generate the<br />

highest levels of medical services, medication utilization, and unnecessary emergency room visits. The<br />

MedWatch nurses work to coordinate and manage medical care for these enrollees. Ms. Polson confirmed<br />

that MedWatch is now receiving medical and pharmacy claims data from BCBSTX and ESI. The nurses<br />

make numerous attempts to contact <strong>Pool</strong> members who may benefit from the program. Out of 1,373<br />

members contacted, only 7 have been unwilling to participate thus far. It is common to encounter some<br />

resistance from members initially, but the nurses are very skilled at persuading members to participate. As<br />

expected, <strong>Pool</strong> enrollees are generally more challenging than individuals associated with other MedWatch<br />

accounts. The nurses’ health assessments of <strong>Pool</strong> members average more than an hour, while the<br />

company’s average assessment time for other clients typically runs just 30 minutes. Since February, there<br />

have been 24,067 interactions with <strong>Pool</strong> members and 1,527 educational mailings. More than 700 <strong>Pool</strong><br />

enrollees are now actively engaged with MedWatch nurse counselors. Another 366 members who were<br />

contacted are no longer enrolled in <strong>Pool</strong>; 53 were already enrolled in case management with BCBSTX; and<br />

MedWatch has referred 20 patients to BCBSTX case management. A total of 1,373 <strong>Pool</strong> members have<br />

been contacted by MedWatch this year. At the next board meeting, Ms. Polson will present a report that<br />

compares emergency room visit data in 2011 versus activity in <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

Ms. Polson reported that the <strong>Pool</strong>’s MedWatch nurses are also focused on achieving reductions in<br />

hemoglobin A1C values for <strong>Pool</strong> diabetic members; she will present results about that initiative at the next<br />

meeting. She anticipates that <strong>Pool</strong> participants’ weight loss savings alone will generate more than $500,000<br />

in annual savings, and she is also collecting data about reductions in blood pressure.<br />

Ms. Polson presented several representative success stories about <strong>Pool</strong> members whose MedWatch nurses<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> Board of Directors<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> Meeting Minutes<br />

Approved February 1, 2013<br />

Page 5 of 8


got involved with their medical care, including one patient who avoided dialysis due to lifestyle changes.<br />

She presented a table that compares participant claims incurred during the last half of Y2011 to the first half<br />

of this year. Aggregate medical costs for participants are dropping as they remain in the MedWatch<br />

program. After she has compiled a full year of cost data, she will provide a more accurate analysis, but the<br />

preliminary cost trend is favorable.<br />

B. Report from Blue Cross Blue Shield of <strong>Texas</strong> (BCBSTX)<br />

Ms. Cyrus Walker informed the Board that she has been promoted to a Senior Director position within the<br />

product development division at <strong>Health</strong> Care Service Corporation. She expressed her appreciation to the<br />

Board for the opportunity to work on the <strong>Pool</strong> account.<br />

Mr. Naiser discussed other account team changes and introduced Mr. Joe Malinowski, who has been<br />

working on the <strong>Pool</strong> account for many years. Mr. Naiser also reported that <strong>Health</strong> Care Service<br />

Corporation recently announced its acquisition of BCBS Montana.<br />

Mr. Naiser presented several key <strong>Pool</strong> indicators, comparing YTD <strong>2012</strong> to YTD 2011. Network discounts<br />

are now averaging 59.1%, up from 58.6% last year. The patient share of total costs dropped 2.4%, as<br />

medical costs have increased.<br />

While the <strong>Pool</strong>’s total number of high-cost claimants has dropped, the number with claims above $100,000<br />

has increased. <strong>Pool</strong> enrollment has fallen 7.9% this year, but the <strong>Pool</strong>’s PMPM medical costs have<br />

increased by 7.8% during the same period. Discussion ensued about increasing inpatient costs and the trend<br />

toward employment of physicians by hospitals. Mr. Naiser discussed <strong>Pool</strong> cost savings generated by<br />

various BCBSTX programs, including case and utilization management.<br />

Mr. Malinowski reviewed the analysis of <strong>Pool</strong> contract guarantees for minimum Y2011 network discounts<br />

and utilization, both of which were met with comfortable margins. BlueChoice and ParPlan networks have<br />

grown by more than 7% since last year. The loss of the ERS account this year has not adversely affected<br />

the networks.<br />

Mr. Garcia presented year-to-date application activity metrics. Application volumes are down 17% from<br />

last year and total enrollment is down 8.4%. From January through <strong>September</strong> of this year, 1,600 <strong>Pool</strong><br />

members have aged out of the program. Of all who cancelled coverage this year, 29% did so because they<br />

turned 65. Two categories of contract performance standards were out of compliance for April and May<br />

and administrative fee penalties were deducted accordingly.<br />

Mr. Don Irby, BCBSTX Actuarial Division, presented his <strong>Pool</strong> medical claim trend analysis. Although<br />

there has been a 3.4% decline in <strong>Pool</strong> membership this year, the average age is increasing, which is part of<br />

the reason that PMPM claim spend is increasing. The <strong>Pool</strong>’s overall 12-month PMPM trend stands at 10%.<br />

Inpatient claim trend is the highest-cost category, now at 15% year over year. Utilization of services is<br />

down, but the services received are more expensive than before. Those members remaining in the <strong>Pool</strong> are<br />

getting older and consuming more expensive services. Nearly all trend is attributable to an increase in<br />

claimants with more than $50,000 in claims. Most of the 10% annual trend is attributable to the aging<br />

population, and an increase in high-cost claimants with cancers, circulatory, and infectious/parasitic<br />

diagnoses.<br />

Mr. Naiser discussed the actions being taken by BCBS Case Management to address the high-cost claimant<br />

issue. The <strong>Pool</strong> policy contains a mandatory case management participation provision, which is helpful and<br />

which BCBSTX does not have with any other account. BCBSTX case managers are sharing data with the<br />

<strong>Pool</strong>’s disease management vendor to enhance early identification. New BCBSTX enterprise-wide<br />

programs for early case management identification include the: 1) Care Coordination Early Identification<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> Board of Directors<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> Meeting Minutes<br />

Approved February 1, 2013<br />

Page 6 of 8


(CCEI) program, launched last month, which focuses on intervention before the patient’s condition<br />

worsens, reduction of inpatient costs due to preadmission calls by nurses to prepare the patient, and postdischarge<br />

calls to ensure patient adherence to avoid readmissions/complications; 2) Weekly High Dollar<br />

claimant report, which a BCBSTX clinical team reviews to identify potential high-cost claimants; and 3)<br />

Integrated Grand Rounds program, which utilizes an interdisciplinary team approach to review high-cost<br />

claimant files to identify very complicated cases. Mr. Naiser agreed to supply Mr. Browning with<br />

information about <strong>Pool</strong> members who are evaluated by the Grand Rounds team.<br />

C. Report from <strong>Health</strong>LinX<br />

Mr. Kellogg reviewed his presentation. He analyzed five state risk pools, including the <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Pool</strong>, and<br />

studied their drug spend in six categories. Rebates, however, are not factored out, which overstates costs<br />

for some of the pools, including <strong>Texas</strong>. He looked first at the antiretroviral drug category. Mail service<br />

levels, formulary placement, and prescribing practices affect this category, but the <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Pool</strong>’s costs are<br />

the next-to-lowest of the pools surveyed. Mr. Kellogg said he will continue to work with the pharmacy<br />

benefit managers of the 5 pools to analyze additional drug categories.<br />

Mr. Kellogg spent some time discussing emerging issues, including the increased use of drug maker<br />

coupons for medications that often offer no clinical advantage, but are more expensive than their preferred<br />

alternatives. The coupon reduces the patient’s cost to a lower copayment, but the plan is still responsible<br />

for the higher cost above the undiscounted copayment. Solodyn was singled out by Mr. Kellogg as an<br />

example. Fortunately, the <strong>Pool</strong> has a clinical step therapy rule in place for Solodyn, which screens out most<br />

coverage requests. Mr. Kellogg will continue to work with ESI to identify couponed drugs the <strong>Pool</strong> may<br />

need to remove from the formulary. Consensus was reached not to amend the <strong>Pool</strong>’s coverage document at<br />

this time to address the coupon issue.<br />

Mr. Kellogg discussed compounded drugs, which are often mispriced by the compounding pharmacy. He is<br />

monitoring the <strong>Pool</strong>’s compounded drug scripts to look for trends that may need to be addressed by the<br />

Board through benefit design adjustments.<br />

D. Report from Express-Scripts (ESI)<br />

Mr. Craig Kessler noted he will be filling the position created by Ms. Jill Stearns’ retirement from ESI. He<br />

has worked at Medco for 13 years and worked at ESI before joining Medco. He is involved exclusively<br />

with government accounts, including three other state risk pools, Alaska, Washington State, and Kansas.<br />

Mr. Ajay Dalal provided updates for open items from the last claims audit. In response to audit results, two<br />

gender-driven system edits were implemented to exclude coverage for: 1) prostate-treatment drugs<br />

prescribed to females; and 2) contraceptives prescribed to males. For the other categories of drugs cited by<br />

the auditor, there can be off-label utility for the opposite gender, so they will be left alone. ESI will<br />

continue to address the overlapping therapy issue, also cited, with alerts to prescribers. Last year 97% of the<br />

overlapping therapy alerts generated by RationalMed were acted upon by the prescribers.<br />

Mr. Patrick Fiduccia presented <strong>Pool</strong> financial results for the first half of <strong>2012</strong>. The <strong>Pool</strong>’s PMPM net drug<br />

cost trend was only 4.1%, which compares favorably to ESI’s governmental book of business, at 4.8%, and<br />

ESI’s other state risk pools, at 12%. This good result for the <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> was attributable to the January 1,<br />

<strong>2012</strong> contract renewal, which established better rebates and discounted pricing.<br />

Discussion ensued about the new hepatitis drugs on the market, which are very effective and will be widely<br />

utilized. Incivek and Victrelis are now available and others are in the pipeline.<br />

During the reporting period, 87.4% of <strong>Pool</strong> enrollees filled a prescription; the average patient age was 52.<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> Board of Directors<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> Meeting Minutes<br />

Approved February 1, 2013<br />

Page 7 of 8


Psychotherapeutic and blood pressure medications experienced large utilization increases. The <strong>Pool</strong>’s<br />

generic dispensing rate increased to 70%, up 5 points from the first half of 2011. When a generic<br />

equivalent is available, <strong>Pool</strong> members are choosing the generic 99.4% of the time; the rest are obtaining<br />

clinical exceptions or paying the brand copayment penalty. Mail service penetration rose a percentage<br />

point to 38%. Mr. Fiduccia confirmed that <strong>Pool</strong> members on maintenance drugs at retail receive periodic<br />

mailings regarding the benefits of mail service.<br />

<strong>Pool</strong> member cost share, as a percentage of drug costs, continues to erode, due to the flat copayment<br />

structure, combined with rising drug prices. <strong>Pool</strong> member cost share dropped from 20.7% to 19.4%.<br />

Mr. Dalal discussed the Top 25 Drugs by Plan Cost report. These 25 costliest drugs represented 36% of<br />

<strong>Pool</strong> drug costs. The <strong>Pool</strong>’s highest cost drugs continue to be Enbrel and Humira, both rheumatoid arthritis<br />

medications, followed by Copaxone.<br />

ESI’s clinical management programs saved $11.2 million during this reporting period, equal to 20% of plan<br />

costs, down slightly from the prior comparison period.<br />

Mr. Fiduccia announced that he has been promoted by ESI to Senior Account Executive and will manage a<br />

large national labor organization account. He thanked the Board for the opportunity to work on the <strong>Pool</strong><br />

account. His replacement has not yet been named.<br />

VI.<br />

Public Comment<br />

Mr. Cole requested public comment, but none was offered.<br />

VII.<br />

Executive Session<br />

At 12:50 p.m. Mr. Cole announced that the Board would go into Executive Session in accordance with the<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> Open Meetings Act to discuss personnel and litigation matters. He asked Board members, <strong>Pool</strong> staff,<br />

and counsel to remain, and invited all others to rejoin the meeting upon conclusion of the Executive<br />

Session.<br />

VIII.<br />

Approval of Executive Session Actions<br />

At 1:25 p.m. Mr. Cole reopened the meeting to the public. Mr. Barbutti moved to approve a 2%<br />

increase in the Executive Director’s salary effective October 1, <strong>2012</strong>. The motion was seconded by<br />

Mr. Ott and unanimously approved.<br />

Mr. Browning and the Board thanked Ms. Denise Haidet, <strong>Pool</strong> office manager, for her service. She is<br />

retiring after 14 years with the <strong>Pool</strong>.<br />

IX.<br />

Adjournment<br />

There being no further business, Ms. McCandless moved to adjourn the meeting. Ms. Milligan<br />

seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved. Mr. Cole adjourned the meeting at 1:30 p.m.<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Pool</strong> Board of Directors<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> Meeting Minutes<br />

Approved February 1, 2013<br />

Page 8 of 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!