Banker's Rights and Duties

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Privilege of Confidentiality Tan Lay Soon v Kam Mah Theathre Sdn Bhd (Malayan United Finance Bhd, , Intervener) ) [1990] 2 MLJ 482 The privelege of confidentiality was that of the customer who was the Dt <strong>and</strong> who by his letter had expressly authorised utilisation of the proceeds of sale to discharge its liability to the intervener. This would amount to the required consent.
No extra-territorial territorial effect Attorney General of Hong Kong v Lorrain Esme Osman & Ors [1994] 3 MLJ 480 Hight Court Attorney General of Hong Kong v Zauyah Wan Chik 7 Ors <strong>and</strong> another appeal [1995] 2 MLJ 620 Court of Appeal Orders to give evidence in Hong Kong Issue: Whether the Bank would be in breach of obligation of confidentiality s 97 BAFIA? Held: No extra territorial effect. No criminal liability in Malaysia.
Page 1 and 2: Law of Banking and Security DR. ZUL
Page 3 and 4: Banker’s s rights and duties 1.
Page 5 and 6: Right to interest express agreemen
Page 7 and 8: Right to set-off Rahimah bte Abdul
Page 9 and 10: Banker’s s duties Duty to receiv
Page 11 and 12: Dishonour customer’s cheques The
Page 13 and 14: Robertson v Canadian Imperial Bank
Page 15: May disclose information Tournier
Page 19 and 20: Restate information as per court or
Page 21 and 22: Customer’s s duties Duty to take
Page 23 and 24: Clear and free from ambiguity Lond
Page 25 and 26: Macmillan duty and Greenwood duty
Page 27 and 28: Termination of B-C B C R/Ship Term
Page 29 and 30: Written Notice Ng Cheng Kiat v Ove

Banker's Rights and Duties

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?