STOCK ASSESSMENT OF WHITE GRUNT FROM THE WEST ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2. Total numbers and total estimated weights of grunt species sampled from the commercial catch by TIP in seven Florida regions during 1992-1998. The proportions of the regional totals over the entire period that were white grunt are given for numbers and weight in the last row of the table. Species Nassau- Brevard Indian R.- Martin Palm Beach – Dade Monroe- Collier Lee- Manatee Pinellas- Franklin Gulf- Escambia Tomtate white grunt Margate ceasar grunt French grunt bluestriped grunt Sailors choice Pigfish black margate Porkfish Proportion that are white grunt No. Wt. No. Wt. No. Wt. No. Wt. No. Wt. No. Wt. No. Wt. 0 0 11 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.9 20 10.8 0 0 227 122 1 1.1 3701 2479 1 3.4 45 80.6 13 14.7 0 0 38 70.3 21 197 95 610 1 5.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1686 684 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2.1 0 0 106 54.5 0 0 7 41.1 0 0 2 3.2 42 23.5 0 0 6 6.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 78.2 344 157 3 1.6 0 0 9 4.7 306 150 25 14.0 2 1.1 241 188 1 1.4 0 0 0 0 3 32.3 0 0 2 0.7 223 117 1 1.1 13 9.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0 0 0.11 0.13 0.03 0.01 0.90 0.75 0.04 0.15 22
Table 3. Total weight of each year’s TIP samples of white grunt and of all grunts within each region. The percentage of the total grunt biomass in each year’s sample that were white grunt was averaged to give an estimate of the annual weight contribution of white grunt to the MFS’ ‘grunts’ category. Nassau-Brevard counties 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 White grunt 0 0 0 0 0 1.89 Annual average Total grunts 2.00 8.92 56.76 37.51 21.36 39.12 Percentage white grunt 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.84% 0.81% Indian River – Martin counties 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 White grunt 0 0 0 0 0 2.46 8.31 Annual average Total grunts 53.20 12.35 71.14 1.76 3.30 72.34 301.18 Proportion white grunt 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 3.40% 2.76% 0.88% Palm Beach – Dade counties 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 White grunt 0 0 Annual average Total grunts 5.08 1.59 Proportion white grunt 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Monroe – Collier counties 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 White grunt 2.47 68.56 0 6.89 42.13 0 1.56 Annual average Total grunts 2.47 91.03 88.30 103.95 215.61 184.60 259.80 Proportion white grunt 100.00% 75.32% 0.00% 6.63% 19.54% 0.00% 0.60% 28.87% 23
Page 1 and 2: STOCK ASSESSMENT OF WHITE GRUNT FRO
Page 3 and 4: higher than the fishing mortality n
Page 5 and 6: grunts off the Carolinas of a maxim
Page 7 and 8: had a peak in spawning activity dur
Page 9 and 10: collected from the commercial fishe
Page 11 and 12: available, 1992-1998. The number of
Page 13 and 14: largest individuals in a cohort (ag
Page 15 and 16: Similarly, point estimates of annua
Page 17 and 18: Greater reductions in landings occu
Page 19 and 20: Manooch, C.S., III. 1976. Age, grow
Page 21: Table 1. Parameter estimates for vo
Page 25 and 26: Table 4. Annual commercial landings
Page 27 and 28: Table 4 (con’t). Annual commercia
Page 29 and 30: Table 14. Bag-limit analysis for wh
Page 31 and 32: 2 100 PERCENT FREQUENCY 80 60 40 20
Page 33 and 34: 5 10 A) FEMALES n=560 8 6 GSI 4 2 3
Page 35 and 36: 7 0.8 INDEX OF COMPLETION 0.6 0.4 0
Page 37 and 38: 9 TOTAL LENGTH (INCHES) 20 15 10 5
Page 39 and 40: Gulf, 1992 Gulf, 1996 Frequency 200
Page 41 and 42: 1,000 Estimated Number of Fish (Tho
Page 43 and 44: Proportion of Annual Landings 0.6 0
Page 45 and 46: A) SPAWNING FEMALES (N=465) B) SPAW
Page 47 and 48: 600 Numbers of fish landed (Thousan
Page 49 and 50: 1.2 Average Weight (lbs) 1 0.8 0.6
Page 51 and 52: a. Atlantic Number of fish 2,000,00
Page 53 and 54: 0.5 1 0.4 Atl-ASPIC 0.8 F per year
Page 55 and 56: a. Atlantic Numbers of fish 900,000

STOCK ASSESSMENT OF WHITE GRUNT FROM THE WEST ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?