LNAPL Modeling recovery and endpoint example
LNAPL Modeling recovery and endpoint example
LNAPL Modeling recovery and endpoint example
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Vertical Distribution Comparison – 1 Layer versus 3 Layer<br />
740<br />
735<br />
730<br />
<strong>LNAPL</strong> Saturation & Relative Permeability<br />
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4<br />
<strong>LNAPL</strong> thickness 7 ft<br />
<strong>LNAPL</strong> Thickness (ft)<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
<strong>LNAPL</strong> Thickness (Gray) <strong>and</strong><br />
Water Table Elevation (Blue)<br />
with Datum at 704.5 ft<br />
Aug-96 Aug-98 Aug-00 Aug-02 Aug-04<br />
<strong>LNAPL</strong> Saturation &<br />
Relative Permeability<br />
0.0 0.2 0.4<br />
Date<br />
Elevation [ft]<br />
725<br />
720<br />
715<br />
710<br />
• <strong>LNAPL</strong> thickness 7 ft<br />
• <strong>LNAPL</strong> thickness 18 ft<br />
• 3 layer accounts SCM<br />
better<br />
• Layering<br />
• <strong>LNAPL</strong> thickness<br />
• etc<br />
705<br />
700<br />
<strong>LNAPL</strong> in the subsurface