Women's Leadership
Women's Leadership
Women's Leadership
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Common Understandings: <strong>Leadership</strong> and <strong>Leadership</strong> Development 37<br />
that there is a significant gap in critical studies based on empirical<br />
research of women’s experiences that address women’s leadership<br />
development.<br />
With men viewed as the ‘natural inhabitants’ of the organisational<br />
domain while women are ‘out of place’ (Ford, 2006: 81),<br />
perhaps it is not altogether surprising that leadership development<br />
largely reflects a gendered stance. Gabriel (2005), for example,<br />
notes that many leadership programmes within business schools<br />
and universities are based on masculine principles that maintain a<br />
gendered view of leadership ‘leaning heavily on game and military<br />
metaphors’ (p. 158).<br />
Consideration of gender is however timely and significant to leadership<br />
development. Burke and Vinnicombe (2006: 8), for instance,<br />
observe how organisations ‘lament the shortage of leaders’ and yet<br />
continue to limit women’s career horizons. UK and international<br />
reports (Equality and Human Rights Commission in the UK, 2008;<br />
and Grant Thornton International Business Report, 2009) demonstrate<br />
that in spite of more women in professional and managerial positions,<br />
pay and power remain unequal. Gatrell and Swan (2008) show that<br />
in spite of increasing legislation around gender, organisations continue<br />
to ignore issues of gender. <strong>Leadership</strong> development therefore, in its<br />
continued construction as ‘gender neutral’ serves only to maintain<br />
such biases.<br />
Conclusions: <strong>Leadership</strong> and leadership development<br />
Although recognising that women’s leadership experiences may be<br />
different, our exploration of common understandings of leadership<br />
and leadership development draws attention to the literature’s<br />
predominant focus on leaders’ styles and characteristics. <strong>Leadership</strong><br />
research and research on women’s leadership more specifically,<br />
continues to address leadership as separate from the broader<br />
sociocultural structures within which it takes place. Studies that<br />
adopt more qualitative methodologies by contrast recognise power<br />
relationships inherent to leadership, recognising it as a social<br />
process in which both leaders and followers are dependent on<br />
each other. Analyses undertaken from a discursive perspective view<br />
leadership as a process that is subject to constant interpretation<br />
and re-interpretation. In this sense leadership is in part a process