16.11.2014 Views

Women's Leadership

Women's Leadership

Women's Leadership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Common Understandings: <strong>Leadership</strong> and <strong>Leadership</strong> Development 37<br />

that there is a significant gap in critical studies based on empirical<br />

research of women’s experiences that address women’s leadership<br />

development.<br />

With men viewed as the ‘natural inhabitants’ of the organisational<br />

domain while women are ‘out of place’ (Ford, 2006: 81),<br />

perhaps it is not altogether surprising that leadership development<br />

largely reflects a gendered stance. Gabriel (2005), for example,<br />

notes that many leadership programmes within business schools<br />

and universities are based on masculine principles that maintain a<br />

gendered view of leadership ‘leaning heavily on game and military<br />

metaphors’ (p. 158).<br />

Consideration of gender is however timely and significant to leadership<br />

development. Burke and Vinnicombe (2006: 8), for instance,<br />

observe how organisations ‘lament the shortage of leaders’ and yet<br />

continue to limit women’s career horizons. UK and international<br />

reports (Equality and Human Rights Commission in the UK, 2008;<br />

and Grant Thornton International Business Report, 2009) demonstrate<br />

that in spite of more women in professional and managerial positions,<br />

pay and power remain unequal. Gatrell and Swan (2008) show that<br />

in spite of increasing legislation around gender, organisations continue<br />

to ignore issues of gender. <strong>Leadership</strong> development therefore, in its<br />

continued construction as ‘gender neutral’ serves only to maintain<br />

such biases.<br />

Conclusions: <strong>Leadership</strong> and leadership development<br />

Although recognising that women’s leadership experiences may be<br />

different, our exploration of common understandings of leadership<br />

and leadership development draws attention to the literature’s<br />

predominant focus on leaders’ styles and characteristics. <strong>Leadership</strong><br />

research and research on women’s leadership more specifically,<br />

continues to address leadership as separate from the broader<br />

sociocultural structures within which it takes place. Studies that<br />

adopt more qualitative methodologies by contrast recognise power<br />

relationships inherent to leadership, recognising it as a social<br />

process in which both leaders and followers are dependent on<br />

each other. Analyses undertaken from a discursive perspective view<br />

leadership as a process that is subject to constant interpretation<br />

and re-interpretation. In this sense leadership is in part a process

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!