17.11.2014 Views

Survey Estimates of Wealth - Mathematica Policy Research

Survey Estimates of Wealth - Mathematica Policy Research

Survey Estimates of Wealth - Mathematica Policy Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eported in public use files and may remove hundreds <strong>of</strong> billions <strong>of</strong> dollars from the estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

aggregate wealth.<br />

Attempts to measure wealth can produce high rates <strong>of</strong> nonresponse, either because<br />

respondents are unwilling to report the details <strong>of</strong> their financial holdings or cannot recall or look<br />

up their account balances. <strong>Survey</strong>s differ in their approach to editing or imputing missing data,<br />

and if nonresponse is high, the imputation procedures chosen and the level <strong>of</strong> attention afforded<br />

their execution can have a very substantial effect on the final estimates. Significant bias may be<br />

unavoidable if nonrandom patterns in the nonresponse cannot be fully reflected in the imputation<br />

models. Our analyses detailed in this report suggest that unspecified changes in the Census<br />

Bureau’s imputation procedures may account for some <strong>of</strong> the evident lack <strong>of</strong> growth in SIPP<br />

median wealth during much <strong>of</strong> the second half <strong>of</strong> the 1990s.<br />

D. EARLIER EVIDENCE ON THE QUALITY OF SIPP WEALTH DATA<br />

The SIPP’s misrepresentation <strong>of</strong> the trend in median household wealth after the early 1990s<br />

is a clear departure from its earlier performance—and not just with respect to median wealth but<br />

other measures as well. Wolff (1999) compared the SIPP, the SCF, and the PSID with respect to<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> measures <strong>of</strong> the size and distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth over the mid-1980s through the mid-<br />

1990s. His findings suggest that, for the lowest two incomes quintiles, the SIPP did as well as<br />

the SCF in capturing asset holdings, and this comparative performance did not deteriorate a great<br />

deal through the next two quintiles, or through the lower 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the income distribution.<br />

The SIPP also did particularly well in capturing the major types <strong>of</strong> wealth held by the middle<br />

class, such as homes, vehicles, and savings bonds; but it did not do so well in capturing the types<br />

<strong>of</strong> assets held by the wealthiest families.<br />

Ten years earlier, Curtin et al. (1989) reported that the 1983 SCF found a substantially<br />

greater proportion <strong>of</strong> all households to be in their top income class ($192,000 or more) than did<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!