18.11.2014 Views

11eApYW

11eApYW

11eApYW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Photo collage provided by Karen Kavanaugh, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University<br />

Law school accreditation<br />

in historical perspective<br />

The recent decision by the Council of the Nova Scotia<br />

Barristers’ Society respecting Trinity Western University’s<br />

proposed law school affords an opportunity to examine the<br />

relation of the LLB to Bar admission in this province.<br />

Academic legal education was not historically in vogue within a<br />

system traditionally driven by apprenticeship, and in the early days<br />

of statutory regulation it was the law degree, not the law school<br />

conferring it, that was potentially a source of controversy.<br />

The Bachelor of Arts counted towards Bar admission; the LLB<br />

did not. Few lawyers held the BA, fewer still the LLB, which was<br />

considered an ornament for elite lawyers rather than a path to the<br />

law. (Nova Scotia’s first lawyer with an LLB, Samuel Cunard West of<br />

Halifax [Harvard, 1847], was called to the Bar in 1849.)<br />

In this regard, New Brunswick was far in advance of Nova Scotia.<br />

In 1867, without consulting the law society, the New Brunswick<br />

legislature amended the law relating to the admission of “attorneys”<br />

to authorize the holder of an LLB from Harvard Law School or any<br />

other legally authorized law school to be called to the Bar after three<br />

years’ studentship rather than four. According to historian D. G.<br />

Bell, New Brunswick thus became “the first Canadian jurisdiction to<br />

recognize the value of the LLB.”<br />

In 1884, Nova Scotia, taking into account the recent opening of<br />

Dalhousie Law School, went much further. The legislature enacted<br />

that the holder of the LLB could waive articled clerkship altogether.<br />

(This radical provision was apparently opposed by the Council of the<br />

Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society and did not last; articled clerkship for<br />

LLBs was soon restored.)<br />

In 1887, the preamble to an act amending the Barristers and Attorneys<br />

Act asserted Council’s control over “the legal education of candidates<br />

for admission to the bar” and implicitly its right to accredit law<br />

schools before the LLB could be granted standing.<br />

In 1891, Dalhousie Law School received statutory recognition;<br />

any holder of the Dalhousie LLB who had passed the Society’s<br />

examination in practice and procedure could be called to the Bar.<br />

Finally in 1899, the Barristers and Solicitors Act was passed, professional<br />

self-regulation achieved and Council<br />

authorized to accredit law schools.<br />

Barry Cahill<br />

Independent scholar<br />

From and after 1939 that power was<br />

embedded in the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society’s Regulations. It<br />

seems doubtful whether law school accreditation ever became an issue<br />

or could have done before 1970, when the LLB became mandatory<br />

for Bar admission.<br />

By 1971 Council had ceased to accredit law schools. The Regulations<br />

defined the law degree as “a bachelor’s degree in law from Dalhousie<br />

University, or when approved by the Committee [i.e., Qualifications<br />

– now Credentials], a degree in law with requirements equivalent<br />

to those for a similar degree from Dalhousie University and from a<br />

university with standards equivalent to those of Dalhousie University.”<br />

The focus and emphasis lay more on the degree than on the degreegranting<br />

institution and reflected the Society’s long-standing special<br />

relationship with Dalhousie Law School.<br />

In 1991, the regulation was amended to make it less Dalhousiespecific;<br />

law degree meant “a bachelor’s degree in common law from a<br />

Canadian law school or, when approved by the Committee, a degree<br />

in law with requirements equivalent to those for a similar degree from<br />

a Canadian law school or from a university with standards equivalent<br />

to those of a Canadian law school.”<br />

In 1997, the regulation was trimmed even further – law degree<br />

meant “a bachelor’s degree in common law from a Canadian law<br />

school” – but an important new element was added: a Certificate<br />

of Qualification issued by the Joint Committee on Accreditation<br />

appointed by the Federation of Law Societies of Canada and the<br />

Committee of Canadian Law Deans (now the FLSC’s National<br />

Committee on Accreditation). This revised regulation was carried<br />

over into the Regulations enacted under the Legal Profession Act<br />

in May 2005. Further amendments were made in 2012 when the<br />

Society adopted a definition of ‘law degree’ that reflected the new role<br />

the FLSC was playing in the accreditation of law schools. The Society<br />

purported to delegate its role to the Federation but later determined<br />

that to be inappropriate and, in light of Trinity Western University’s<br />

proposed law school, Council revised the regulation in July 2014 to<br />

the following:<br />

Fall 2014 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!