18.11.2014 Views

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE HELD ON ...

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE HELD ON ...

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE HELD ON ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRESENT:<br />

Trevor Cooper – Chair<br />

Delroy Brown<br />

Tony Grady<br />

Ralph Tonge<br />

<strong>MINUTES</strong> <strong>OF</strong> A <strong>MEETING</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>AUDIT</strong> <strong>COMMITTEE</strong><br />

<strong>HELD</strong> <strong>ON</strong> M<strong>ON</strong>DAY 6 OCTOBER 2008 AT 8.00am<br />

IN ATTENDANCE:<br />

Margaret Allen – Interim Deputy Principal<br />

David White – Interim Vice Principal Corporate<br />

Andrew Hartley – Director of Funding and Financial Resources<br />

Val Mattinson – Director of Corporate and External Affairs<br />

Ian Falconer – Grant Thornton<br />

Will Simpson – Grant Thornton<br />

Claire Kay - Clerk to the Corporation<br />

1. <strong>MEETING</strong> WITH <strong>AUDIT</strong>ORS WITHOUT MANAGEMENT PRESENT<br />

The members used this time to consult with auditors on issues arising from the agenda.<br />

Members noted the concerns expressed by the IAS team regarding their performance<br />

presented on the agenda under item 11. There were issues identified in the report which<br />

the IAS had not had the opportunity to discuss with management. Members agreed that<br />

the issues relating to performance would be discussed under item 11 and Tony Grady<br />

offered himself to facilitate an open debate outside the meeting if required.<br />

The Chair asked auditors for their experience of the attendance of the Principal at Audit<br />

Committees around the sector. IAS reported a discussion at the 157 group asking that<br />

exact question, a straw pole showed a 50:50 split of Principals attending and not attending,<br />

Grant Thornton reported a split more like 70:30 of Principals attending in their client base.<br />

Members discussed the merits of the Principal attending and whether it jeopardised the<br />

independence of the Committee. On balance it was agreed that the Principal should attend<br />

but if necessary could withdraw from the discussions if it would benefit the independence of<br />

the Committee.<br />

The confidential minute from the session at the last meeting was reviewed and agreed by<br />

members, and signed by the Chair.<br />

Members of College management joined the meeting at 8.15 am. The Chair welcomed<br />

David White to the meeting.<br />

2. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE<br />

Apologies for absence had been received from Graham Charlton and Geoff Hall.<br />

3. DECLARATI<strong>ON</strong>S <strong>OF</strong> PERS<strong>ON</strong>AL INTEREST IN AGENDA ITEMS<br />

There were no declarations of personal interest in the agenda items.<br />

4. <strong>MINUTES</strong><br />

The minutes were amended to indicate the Principal as being in attendance. The minutes<br />

of the meeting held on 30 June 2008 were confirmed and signed.<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ __<br />

Page 1 of 5<br />

Created by Claire Kay


5. MATTERS ARISING<br />

a) Student union financial strategy<br />

RT informed members that the increased activities reported to the last meeting by<br />

the Student Union Liaison Officer had been well received by students and had<br />

resulted in an increased uptake of NUS membership which in turn increased the SU<br />

income for the year.<br />

b) Declaration of personal interest<br />

The Clerk updated the Committee on the outcomes of the discussion with the<br />

previous committee Chair and the Principal with regard to his position of Trustee of<br />

the Public Governance Institute set up by KPMG. It had been agreed the Principal<br />

take up the invitation to be a trustee of this new group but to decline any<br />

remuneration as a result of the position. The previous Chair had accepted that the<br />

position would be beneficial to the College as a networking opportunity and for the<br />

development of best practice within the organisation. Members noted and<br />

supported the action taken by the previous Chair.<br />

b) Corporation papers<br />

IAS confirmed that they were now receiving corporation papers for information, and<br />

had received copies of the Due Diligence reports.<br />

6. REPORT FROM <strong>THE</strong> <strong>AUDIT</strong> AND RISK MANAGEMENT GROUP<br />

Members received an update report on the work undertaken by this group. All items would<br />

be discussed separately on the agenda.<br />

The report was noted<br />

7. RECOMMENDATI<strong>ON</strong> TRACKING EXCEPTI<strong>ON</strong> REPORT<br />

The report used to track the progress to date of audit recommendations was presented to<br />

members. Members discussed overdue items and their risk rating. The summary of<br />

outstanding items was reviewed. A revised schedule would be circulated to members<br />

following the meeting. Members discussed the contents of the report in detail and were<br />

satisfied that recommendations were being monitored and addressed appropriately.<br />

The report was noted.<br />

D Brown joined the meeting at 8.30am.<br />

8. INTERNAL <strong>AUDIT</strong> REPORTS<br />

Support Services for Learners<br />

The aim of the audit was discussed and it was concluded that the overall strategic view as<br />

to whether the financial cost of the services provided was matched with the benefit to the<br />

learner of the College providing this service, still needed to be addressed. A more in depth<br />

review was required from a strategic position and it was agreed for this to be returned to the<br />

next meeting. The conclusions of the internal audit undertaken found the operational areas<br />

which could contribute or impact on student achievement and the learner experience were<br />

robust and concluded controls were suitably designed and operating with sufficient<br />

effectiveness to provide reasonable assurance that the related risk management objectives<br />

were achieved during the period.<br />

Train to Gain<br />

Members noted this was a high risk, high growth area for the College and although four<br />

recommendations had been made in the report, similar issues had been seen at other<br />

colleges in the sector especially forecasting and margins. Members noted the strategic<br />

decision to invest in the area of Train to Gain and the overall operating position of the area<br />

in 2007/08. The steps being undertaken to improve the overall margin and reduce the<br />

organisational risk of this provision were discussed. Members noted the LSC PFM report<br />

on Train to Gain would be available for the next meeting. The conclusions reported by the<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ __<br />

Page 2 of 5<br />

Created by Claire Kay


IAS were that the controls were suitably designed and operating with sufficient<br />

effectiveness to provide reasonable assurance that the related risk management objectives<br />

were achieved during the period subject to the recommendations made.<br />

Learner number systems<br />

The report provided good assurance in the key area of learner number systems outlining a<br />

robust system. The report also commented on the good progress made against<br />

recommendations for improvement in last year’s report. The conclusions reported by the<br />

IAS were that the controls were suitably designed and operating with sufficient<br />

effectiveness to provide reasonable assurance that the related risk management objectives<br />

were achieved during the period.<br />

Ofsted Inspection follow-up<br />

The report approved by the Committee at the last meeting was presented outlining the<br />

progress made against recommendations from the Ofsted inspection in 2005. IAS<br />

concluded that the College had appropriate mechanisms in place for implementing and<br />

monitoring progress of recommendations.<br />

Data Security<br />

IAS reported to the Committee the significant progress which had been made in the area of<br />

IT. The report made several recommendations to build on the existing good practice in<br />

data security within the College but none were high priority. Members questioned<br />

management about the location and security around sensitive data and data protocols and<br />

requested a cost benefit analysis on the use of encryption to improve data security. The<br />

conclusions reported by the IAS were that the controls were suitably designed and<br />

operating with sufficient effectiveness to provide reasonable assurance that the related risk<br />

management objectives were achieved during the period.<br />

Merger<br />

The Committee received the report presented to the Corporation meeting in July on the<br />

decision making process on merger. This report was an additional review requested in<br />

relation to the identification by the Committee that a risk review on merger should be<br />

undertaken. Members received the report and noted it was considered helpful to the Board<br />

at the time it was presented.<br />

The Committee resolved:<br />

to adopt the IAS reports considered by the Committee.<br />

9. DUE DILIGENCE<br />

The Committee considered the key headlines from the due diligence report on ncn and how<br />

the risks identified were being mitigated in year.<br />

The report was noted.<br />

10. IAS ANNUAL REPORT 2007/08<br />

The draft Annual Report for 2007/08 was presented by Grant Thornton. Members noted<br />

this report formed an important part of the assurance mechanism for the statement on<br />

internal controls within the annual financial statements. The report concluded that controls<br />

were suitably designed and operating satisfactorily in the areas of risk management,<br />

corporate governance and internal system of controls, with the exception of the monitoring<br />

and management fees in connection with Train to Gain. Operational assurance was<br />

recorded as good in 5 out of the 7 areas in accordance with LSC guidance, and adequate in<br />

the area of managing risk in association with merger and economical and efficient use of<br />

resources.<br />

Members noted the increase of days and cost from budget was due to the additional review<br />

with regard to merger.<br />

Members requested the following changes to the report:<br />

• Text be altered to reflect the correct position with regard to merger<br />

• Identify specifically the additional work, time and cost of the merger review<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ __<br />

Page 3 of 5<br />

Created by Claire Kay


• Alter textual commentary on pages 8&9 including reviewing the fundamental<br />

matters.<br />

A final draft would be presented to the Committee at the meeting in November.<br />

11. INTERNAL <strong>AUDIT</strong> SERVICE<br />

A report was tabled outlining the assessment of the performance of the IAS by<br />

management. The Chair requested this be discussed with the IAS team and a further<br />

report brought to the Committee in November.<br />

Grant Thornton withdrew for this item.<br />

The Committee discussed the re-appointment of Grant Thornton taking into account the<br />

discussion at the last meeting regarding merger and the timing of a re-tender process.<br />

Members considered the financial regulations and the current duration of the Grant<br />

Thornton contract.<br />

The Committee resolved:<br />

• that the re-appointment of Grant Thornton as the College’s Internal Audit<br />

Service for 2008/09 be recommended to the Corporation;<br />

• that the process for re-tendering the Internal Audit Service in accordance with<br />

the Audit Code of Practice and the College Financial Regulations would<br />

commence during 2008/09 for a new contract term starting 2009/10.<br />

The Committee discussed the involvement of members in the tendering and appointment<br />

process for IAS and agreed that 2 members of the Committee (Chair plus Tony Grady),<br />

Director of Finance and VP Corporate Services should form the panel to undertake the<br />

process of appointment and report back to the Committee. Members agreed the Principal<br />

should not be involved in the process to ensure independence of the appointment.<br />

12. INTERNAL <strong>AUDIT</strong> PLAN 2008/09<br />

The full year plan was presented to members building on the 6 month plan discussed in<br />

June. The plan covered the statutory requirements of the Audit Code of Practice and<br />

outlined the number of audit days required to deliver the plan and the overall cost to the<br />

College. Members noted that proposed areas covered in the plan and discussed them in<br />

relation to the overall risk to the College and the relevance areas had to Framework for<br />

Excellence.<br />

The Committee resolved:<br />

to recommend the Internal Audit Plan for 2008/09 to the Corporation.<br />

13. RISK MANAGEMENT<br />

The Committee received the Annual Review of risk management for 2007/08 noting the<br />

changes in process for monitoring the mitigation of risks in year and the changes made to<br />

the risk register in year. The risk management strategy for 2008/09 was presented along<br />

with the risk register. Members questioned management about some of the detailed risks<br />

around staffing, merger and insurance.<br />

The Committee resolved:<br />

• to recommend the risk management strategy for 2008/09 to the Corporation;<br />

• to recommend the 2008/09 risk register to the Corporation.<br />

14. WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY AND PROCEDURE<br />

A revised policy was presented to the Committee. The policy had been revised following<br />

an IAS recommendation and now reflected current legislation and best practise. Members<br />

discussed the relevance and use of this policy by students and requested a reference to<br />

students within paragraph 1.3. Members noted the means by which the policy would be<br />

promoted to staff, students and stakeholders and encouraged the training of staff named as<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ __<br />

Page 4 of 5<br />

Created by Claire Kay


a first point of contact to ensure appropriate use of the policy. An amendment was required<br />

to ensure consistency of contacts within the policy.<br />

The Committee resolved:<br />

to recommend the Whistleblowing Policy to the Corporation, subject to the<br />

amendments noted above.<br />

15. <strong>COMMITTEE</strong> ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT<br />

The Committee considered the self-assessment circulated prior to the meeting. Members<br />

discussed the evidence provided in the report and noted that although value for money<br />

remained satisfactory additional reports had been received by the Committee in year, it was<br />

noted that the KPI’s in Framework for Excellence would help quantify this for the<br />

Committee. Risk management was graded good due to the cancellation of the September<br />

2007 meeting which resulted in the Committee being unable to perform their role in<br />

overseeing the annual risk management review. Although the Committee accepted the risk<br />

management framework overall remained outstanding, members considered their duties in<br />

this process were not fully carried out. Members considered the Committee now had a high<br />

level of expertise. Members agreed their performance against the predetermined criteria<br />

as:<br />

• Effectiveness good<br />

• Risk management good<br />

• Value for money satisfactory<br />

• Decision making outstanding<br />

16. C<strong>ON</strong>FIDENTIALITY <strong>OF</strong> BUSINESS<br />

No items were considered confidential.<br />

17. DATE <strong>OF</strong> NEXT <strong>MEETING</strong><br />

The next scheduled meeting was 26 November 2007.<br />

Members had received for information the KPMG benchmarking data on college’s financial<br />

performance for 2007/08 - it was noted this was for KPMG clients only.<br />

The Chair closed the meeting at 10.00am.<br />

SIGNED: ___________________________________________________ ______<br />

DATE: _______________________________________________________ _<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ __<br />

Page 5 of 5<br />

Created by Claire Kay

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!