Flatspace Holography as a Limit of AdS/CFT
Flatspace Holography as a Limit of AdS/CFT
Flatspace Holography as a Limit of AdS/CFT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong><br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Particles and Accelerator,IPM,Tehran<br />
Seventh Crete Regional Meeting in String Theory<br />
June 2013<br />
B<strong>as</strong>ed on:<br />
A. Bagchi, R. F. (arXiv:1203.5795),<br />
A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, R. F. , Joan Simon (arXiv:1208.4372)<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Motivation<br />
<strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong> provides a holographic picture for the gravitational<br />
theory.<br />
Is it possible to generalize holography for gravity in other<br />
backgrounds?<br />
Our universe is more like flat rather than <strong>AdS</strong>!<br />
Does flat space have a holographic picture <strong>as</strong> a lower<br />
dimensional field theory!<br />
Our answer is yes! Starting from <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>, one can study<br />
flat-space holography.<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
First step: Symmetries<br />
<strong>AdS</strong> d isometry= SO(2, d − 1) = symmetries <strong>of</strong> <strong>CFT</strong> d−1 .<br />
Dictionary <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong> → (Asymptotic symmetries <strong>of</strong><br />
gravity=symmetries <strong>of</strong> dual theory)<br />
Often, ASG→ isometry <strong>of</strong> the vacuum:<br />
ASG(<strong>AdS</strong> d+2 ) = SO(d + 1, 2). (for d > 1.)<br />
Famous exception: ASG(<strong>AdS</strong> 3 ) = Vir<strong>as</strong>oro ⊗ Vir<strong>as</strong>oro.<br />
[Brown, Henneaux 1986]<br />
Another interesting example: Near Horizon Extreme Kerr.<br />
[Bardeen, Horowitz 1999]; [Guica, Hartman, Song, Strominger 2008]<br />
Non-trivial ASG for <strong>as</strong>ymptotically Minkowski spacetimes at<br />
null infinity in three and four dimensions.<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Asymptotic Symmetries and Flat-spacetimes<br />
BMS 3 :<br />
[J m , J n ] = (m − n)J m+n , [J m , P n ] = (m − n)P m+n , [P m , P n ] = 0.<br />
(1)<br />
J m = Global Conformal Generators <strong>of</strong> S 1 .<br />
P m = ”Super” translations (depends on θ) → Infinite<br />
dimensional.<br />
[Ashtekar, Bicak, Schmidt 1996]<br />
Further Extension: Can compute central extensions:<br />
[Barnich-Compere 2006]<br />
C JJ = 0, C JP = 3 G , C PP = 0 (2)<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Asymptotic Symmetries and Flat-spacetimes .<br />
BMS 4 :<br />
[l m , l n ] = (m − n)l m+n , [¯l m ,¯l n ] = (m − n)¯l m+n , [l m ,¯l n ] = 0,<br />
[l l , T m,n ] = ( l + 1 − m)T m+l,n , [¯l l , T m,n ] = ( l + 1 − n)T m,n+l .<br />
2<br />
2<br />
l m ,¯l m = Global Conformal Generators <strong>of</strong> S 2 .<br />
T m,n = ”Super” translations → Infinite dimensional.<br />
(m, n = 0, ±1): Poincare group in 4d.<br />
[ Bondi, van der Burg, Metzner; Sachs 1962]<br />
Vir<strong>as</strong>oros can have central extensions. [ Barnich, Troessaert 2009]<br />
One may expect that holographic dual <strong>of</strong> flat space h<strong>as</strong> BMS<br />
symmetry.What is this theory?<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Flat space limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong><br />
<strong>AdS</strong> 3 space-time:<br />
ds 2 = −(1 + r 2<br />
l 2 )dt2 + (1 + r 2<br />
l 2 )−1 dr 2 + r 2 dφ 2 (3)<br />
In the limit l → ∞(zero cosmological constant), we find flat<br />
space.<br />
Asymptotic Symmetry is Vir ⊗ Vir:<br />
[L m , L n ] = (m − n)L m+n + c 12 m(m2 − 1)δ m+n,0<br />
[¯L m , ¯L n ] = (m − n)¯L m+n + ¯c 12 m(m2 − 1)δ m+n,0<br />
where c = ¯c = 3l/2G.<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Flat space limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>.<br />
Define: L n = L n − ¯L −n ,<br />
l → ∞ is well-defined and yields<br />
where<br />
M n = (L n + ¯L −n )/l.<br />
[L m , L n ] = (m − n)L m+n + C 1<br />
12 m(m2 − 1)δ m+n,0<br />
[L m , M n ] = (m − n)M m+n + C 2<br />
12 m(m2 − 1)δ m+n,0<br />
[Barnich-Compere 2006]<br />
C 1 = c − ¯c = 0, C 2 =<br />
(¯c + c)<br />
l<br />
= 3 G<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Making sense <strong>of</strong> flat space limit in the <strong>CFT</strong> side<br />
What does flat space limit mean in the <strong>CFT</strong> side?<br />
Dual <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong> 3 in the global coordinate is a two dimensional<br />
<strong>CFT</strong> on the cylinder with generators:<br />
L n = −e nw ∂ w , ¯Ln = −e n ¯w ∂ ¯w (w = t + ix, ¯w = t − ix)<br />
(4)<br />
Define L n = L n − ¯L −n , M n = ɛ(L n + ¯L −n ).<br />
Use a spacetime contraction: t → ɛt, x → x.<br />
Final generators in the ɛ → 0 limit:<br />
L n = −e inx (i∂ x + nt∂ t ), M n = −e inx ∂ t (5)<br />
The resultant algebra in the ɛ → 0 limit is BMS 3 with central<br />
charges: c LL = C 1 = c − ¯c, c LM = C 2 = ɛ(c + ¯c)<br />
[A. Bagchi, R. F. (2012)]<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Making sense <strong>of</strong> flat space limit in the <strong>CFT</strong> side.<br />
Proposal: Holographic dual <strong>of</strong> flat space-time is a<br />
t-contracted <strong>CFT</strong>.<br />
For the two-dimensional c<strong>as</strong>e, it is a non-relativistic field<br />
theory which h<strong>as</strong> Galilean Conformal symmetry.<br />
For the higher-dimensional c<strong>as</strong>es we can apply contraction <strong>of</strong><br />
time. The resultant algebra is higher-dimensional BMS.<br />
Correlation function<br />
The limit from the correlation functions <strong>of</strong> parent <strong>CFT</strong> yield<br />
interesting structures.<br />
Two point function <strong>of</strong> two primary operators is given by<br />
G (2) (φ 1 , τ 1 , φ 2 , τ 2 ) = C 1 (1 − cos φ 12 ) −2h L<br />
e ih Mτ 12 cot(φ 12 /2)<br />
where h L = lim ɛ→0 (h − ¯h), h M = lim ɛ→0 ɛ(h + ¯h)<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Next Step: Flat limit <strong>of</strong> BTZ<br />
No <strong>as</strong>ymptotically flat black hole solutions in the three<br />
dimensional gravity. [D. Ida, 2000]<br />
The flat limit <strong>of</strong> BTZ is well-defind!<br />
BTZ black holes:<br />
ds 2 = − (r 2 − r+)(r 2 2 − r−)<br />
2<br />
r 2 l 2 dt 2 r 2 l 2<br />
+<br />
(r 2 − r+)(r 2 2 − r−) 2 dr 2<br />
l → ∞ :<br />
+ r 2 ( dφ − r +r −<br />
lr 2 dt ) 2<br />
r − → r 0 =<br />
√<br />
2G<br />
M |J|, r + → lˆr + = l √ 8GM (6)<br />
Flat BTZ: a cosmiological solution <strong>of</strong> 3d Einstein gravity<br />
ds 2 FBTZ = ˆr 2 +dt 2 −<br />
r 2 dr 2<br />
ˆr 2 +(r 2 − r 2 0 ) + r 2 dφ 2 − 2ˆr + r 0 dtdφ (7)<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Next Step: Flat limit <strong>of</strong> BTZ.<br />
FBTZ is a shifted- boost orbifold <strong>of</strong> R 1,2<br />
[L. Cornalba, M. S. Costa(2002)]<br />
r = r 0 is a cosmological horizon:<br />
T = ˆr +<br />
2 , S = πr 0<br />
2πr 0 2G<br />
(8)<br />
Satisfy the inner horizon first law!<br />
TdS = −dM + ΩdJ (9)<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Dual field theory analysis: a Cardy-like formula<br />
3d <strong>as</strong>ymptotically flat spacetimes −→ states <strong>of</strong> field theory<br />
with BMS symmetry.<br />
The states are labelled by eigenvalues <strong>of</strong> L 0 and M 0 :<br />
where<br />
L 0 |h L , h M 〉 = h L |h L , h M 〉, M 0 |h L , h M 〉 = h M |h L , h M 〉,<br />
h L = lim<br />
ɛ→0<br />
(h − ¯h) = J,<br />
h M = lim<br />
ɛ→0<br />
ɛ(h + ¯h) = GM + 1 8 (10)<br />
Degeneracy <strong>of</strong> states with (h L , h M ) −→ Entropy <strong>of</strong><br />
cosmological solution with (r 0 , ˆr + )<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Dual field theory analysis: a Cardy-like formula<br />
Is there any Cardy-like formula? YES<br />
Partition function <strong>of</strong> t-contracted <strong>CFT</strong>:<br />
Z(η, ρ) = ∑ d(h L , h M )e 2π(ηh L+ρh M )<br />
(11)<br />
where<br />
η = 1 2 (τ + ¯τ), ρ = 1 ɛ(τ − ¯τ) (12)<br />
2<br />
S-transformation:<br />
(τ, ¯τ) → (− 1 τ , − 1¯τ ) ⇒ (η, ρ) → (− 1 η , ρ η 2 ) (13)<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Dual field theory analysis: a Cardy-like formula .<br />
Modular invariance <strong>of</strong><br />
Z 0 (η, ρ) = e −πiρC M<br />
Z(η, ρ) (14)<br />
results in<br />
S = log d(h L , h M ) = 2πh L<br />
√<br />
C M<br />
2h M<br />
(15)<br />
[A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, R. F. , Joan Simon (2012)]<br />
In agreement with the entropy <strong>of</strong> cosmological solution!<br />
At sufficiently high temperature hot flat space tunnels into a<br />
universe described by flat space cosmology.[A. Bagchi, S.<br />
Detournay, D. Grumiller, J. Simon ]<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Current Directions<br />
Extension <strong>of</strong> BMS algebra to higher spin c<strong>as</strong>e [Work in progress<br />
with Hamid Afshar, Daniel Grumiller and Jan Rosseel]<br />
sl(3, R) algebra:<br />
[L m , L n ] = (m − n)L m+n<br />
[L m , W n ] = (2m − n)W m+n<br />
[W m , W n ] = (m − n)(2m 2 + 2n 2 − mn − 8)L m+n (16)<br />
where m, n are 0, ±1 in L m and 0, ±1, ±2 in W m .<br />
New generators:<br />
L m = L m − ¯L −m , M m = ɛ(L m + ¯L −m )<br />
U m = (W m − ¯W −m ), V m = ɛ(W m + ¯W −m ) (17)<br />
ɛ → 0 is well-defined:<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Current Directions<br />
[L m , L n ] = (m − n)L m+n [L m , M n ] = (m − n)M m+n<br />
[L m , U n ] = (2m − n)U m+n [L m , V n ] = (2m − n)V m+n<br />
[M m , U n ] = (2m − n)V m+n<br />
[U m , U n ] = (m − n)(2m 2 + 2n 2 − mn − 8)L m+n<br />
[U m , V n ] = (m − n)(2m 2 + 2n 2 − mn − 8)M m+n (18)<br />
Extension <strong>of</strong> BMS algebra−→ WBMS algebra!<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Current Directions<br />
Question: Is WBMS a symmetry <strong>of</strong> higher spin gravity in the<br />
flat spacetimes?<br />
Spin 2 c<strong>as</strong>e: Chern-Simons formulation<br />
A flat = A n M M n + A n L L n, n = 0, ±1 (19)<br />
L n and M n are generators <strong>of</strong> BMS and<br />
A M = e 1 , A 1 M = 1 2 (e0 + e 2 ), A −1<br />
M = 1 2 (e0 − e 2 ),<br />
A 0 L = ω1 , A 1 L = 1 2 (ω0 + ω 2 ), A −1<br />
L<br />
= 1 2 (ω0 − ω 2 ).<br />
(20)<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Current Directions<br />
Our observation:<br />
L n = lim<br />
l→∞<br />
(L n − ¯L −n ),<br />
1<br />
M n = lim<br />
l→∞ l (L n + ¯L −n ),<br />
A n L = lim 1<br />
l→∞ 2 (An + Ān ), A n M = lim l<br />
l→∞ 2 (An − Ān ). (21)<br />
A proposal: 3d spin three flat gravity with WBMS symmetry<br />
where<br />
A flat = A n M M n + A n L L n + A m U U m + A m V V m, (22)<br />
U m = lim<br />
l→∞<br />
(W m − ¯W −m ),<br />
n = 0, ±1, m = 0, ±1, ±2<br />
1<br />
V m = lim<br />
l→∞ l (W m + ¯W −m )<br />
A m U = lim 1<br />
l→∞ 2 (Am W + Ām W ), Am V = lim<br />
l→∞<br />
Poisson-brackets <strong>of</strong> boundary preserving gauge<br />
transformations results in WBMS algebra.<br />
l<br />
2 (Am W − Ām W ).<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Summary<br />
Flat space limit in the bulk side is equivalent to t-contraction<br />
in the boundary theory.<br />
Equivalence <strong>of</strong> symmetries is an evidence.<br />
Correlation functions are well-defined.<br />
Counting <strong>of</strong> states supports this proposal.<br />
One can talk about higher-spin gravity in the 3d flat<br />
spacetime.<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Future Direction<br />
Entanglement Entropy <strong>of</strong> BMS field theory<br />
l → ∞ limit <strong>of</strong> holographic entanglement entropy in the<br />
global <strong>AdS</strong> 3 is well-defined:<br />
S = Λ ( ) ∆φ<br />
2G sin = 1 ( ) ∆φ<br />
2 6 c MΛ sin<br />
2<br />
(23)<br />
Is it possible to derive it from BMS field theory?<br />
Black Hole Entropy<br />
Possible existence <strong>of</strong> BMS algebra in the NH geometries <strong>of</strong><br />
non-extremal Black holes (Branes).<br />
Can we reproduce entropy <strong>of</strong> non-extremal black holes through<br />
a microscopic description in terms <strong>of</strong> contracted <strong>CFT</strong>?<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>
Thank you<br />
Reza Fareghbal<br />
<strong>Flatspace</strong> <strong>Holography</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Limit</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>AdS</strong>/<strong>CFT</strong>