19.11.2014 Views

Asian American Women - Ford Foundation

Asian American Women - Ford Foundation

Asian American Women - Ford Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

charge, confusion about which immigrants are eligible for which programs, and<br />

language barriers. Other barriers include the hostility of state and county government<br />

and caseworkers toward immigrants and intimidating government tactics<br />

that discourage immigrants from applying for benefits.<br />

1. Oppressive Government Tactics<br />

From 1994-99, the State of California funded a program at border points and airports<br />

to “catch” immigrant women who used prenatal care provided by Medicaid.<br />

Latina women were detained at the Mexican border by state and INS agents. At the<br />

San Francisco and Los Angeles airports, 50% of those detained were <strong>Asian</strong> women,<br />

25% were Latina, and 25% were of other nationalities. State and INS officials<br />

specifically targeted women of childbearing age on flights from Asia and Mexico.<br />

Under questioning, if a woman indicated she had recently given birth and received<br />

public assistance at that time, the INS agent on the spot decided whether she was<br />

a public charge and whether or not she received the assistance fraudulently. The<br />

state agent calculated how much she received. <strong>Women</strong> were intimidated into<br />

repaying the Medicaid benefits they received, even if they obtained the benefits<br />

legally, by the threat of imprisonment, deportation, or reduced chances for obtaining<br />

green cards or citizenship. In this way, California illegally collected $3.8 million<br />

from approximately 1,500 <strong>Asian</strong> and Latina women. 12<br />

2. The “Public Charge” Label<br />

If the INS considers a person likely to be public charge, i.e. someone who either<br />

has become or has the possibility of becoming dependent on government benefits,<br />

it can deny an immigrant’s application for a green card, refuse immigrants reentry<br />

into the US, or deport the person. Being considered a public charge by the INS is<br />

among the top barriers to immigrant women applying for public assistance. In<br />

May 1999, the INS issued guidelines making it clear that use of food stamps, nutritional<br />

assistance, Medicaid, and school lunches would not make an immigrant a<br />

public charge. Nonetheless, thousands of <strong>Asian</strong> immigrant women will not apply<br />

for food stamps and Medicaid. More than a year after the INS guidelines were<br />

issued, most Los Angeles area <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>American</strong> service providers surveyed in the<br />

APALC study stated they were reluctant to give assurances to immigrant women<br />

because they themselves were skeptical of the INS guidelines. The health consequences<br />

to women and their children who do not have Medicaid are already<br />

becoming manifest. The National Immigrant Law Center recently reported that<br />

infant mortality rates are climbing in immigrant communities such as New York<br />

City’s Bedford-Stuyvesant, Harlem, and in parts of Brooklyn and the Bronx.<br />

12<br />

The program was challenged in court and settlements were reached that required the state to<br />

return the moneys unlawfully collected by the state. In April 1999, the state legislature defunded<br />

the program.<br />

37 Part 1, Economic Justice

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!