20.11.2014 Views

1986 News Releases - The Exon Library

1986 News Releases - The Exon Library

1986 News Releases - The Exon Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>1986</strong> <strong>News</strong> <strong>Releases</strong><br />

JANUARY<br />

001 01-24 Asks USDA to clarify Gramm-Rudman cuts o<br />

002 01-28 Space Shuttle explosion<br />

003 01-29 Richard Lyng nominated to USDA Secretary<br />

FEBRUARY<br />

004 02-04 Cosponsors Trade Expansion bill<br />

005 02-04 State of Union Reaction<br />

006 02-06 Urges USDA not to delay Food Stamp rules<br />

007 02-07 Supports test to televise the Senate cha<br />

008 02-07 Asks Farm Credit to explain interest rat<br />

009 02-11 U.S. Senate-Japan Scholarship winners<br />

010 02-13 Admitted for eye surgery<br />

011 02-19 Close loopholes in imported ethanol laws<br />

012 02-20 Honored by Renewable Fuels Association<br />

013 02-21 Objects to 60% cut in FmHA operating loa<br />

014 02-21 Objects to SCS workers move from Lincoln<br />

015 02-25 Recuperating slowly from eye surgery<br />

016 02-26 <strong>Exon</strong>-Zoro oppose "Old" gas deregulation<br />

017 02-26 Former AP reporter Odell Hanson dies<br />

018 02-27 Boys Town postage stamp<br />

MARCH<br />

019 03-11 Support deferral of ag losses by rural b<br />

020 03-12 Encouraged by FDIC rural bank changes


021 03-12 Pleased by President's Release of FmHA l<br />

022 03-13 Reduce number of soil survey reports pri<br />

023 03-13 Amend to Constitutional Balanced Budget<br />

024 03-13 Success on '87 Ag Budget freeze<br />

025 03-13 DOT $1.7 million grant to Omaha Airport<br />

026 03-14 HUD Homestead Grant to Omaha<br />

027 03-19 <strong>Exon</strong> vote puts sends 87 budget to Senate<br />

028 03-27 Rural Banks Aided by Law Change<br />

APRIL<br />

029 04-02 Praises dropping duty free status of imp<br />

030 04-02 Ex-Zo release requesting Ag-hearing in N<br />

031 04-09 Beef-Dairy Slaughter Resolution Offered<br />

032 04-10 Senate Approves Beef-Dairy Slaughter Res<br />

033 04-10 Corrects Nebr. Traffic Accident Figures<br />

33A 04-12 Effects of Dairy Slaughter 'Devastating'<br />

034 04-15 U.S. Attack on Libya<br />

035 04-16 <strong>Exon</strong> Appointed to Demo Group on Nat'l Se<br />

036 04-17 Disappointed at Allies Reaction to bombi<br />

037 04-18 Bill Introduced on 70 mph Interstate spe<br />

038 04-22 IRS Mileage Record Keeping Cosponsored<br />

039 04-24 Cosponsor Tax Extension for Insolvent Fa<br />

040 04-28 2nd Letter to Sec. of Ag. on Soil Survey<br />

MAY<br />

041 05-01 Action Needed to Move 87 Budget<br />

042 05-01 $5.6 Million Grant for Grand Island VA H<br />

043 05-06 Abandon Soil Service office Move to Texa


044 05-06 Praises Defense Reorganization Bill Pass<br />

045 05-09 Aid Ethanol Industry<br />

046 05-12 National Eye Care Project<br />

047 05-12 1985 Financial Disclosure<br />

048 05-15 Toughen Grain Quality Standards<br />

049 05-19 FAA Study<br />

050 05-20 Opposes Daylight Savings Time Extension<br />

051 05-20 Nebr. & Omaha Mass Transit Grants<br />

052 05-23 <strong>Exon</strong>-Zoro Want Increased Funding for Nor<br />

053 05-30 Supplemental Appropriations Good for Agr<br />

JUNE<br />

054 06-06 <strong>Exon</strong> Old Gas Decontrol Amendment Narrowl<br />

055 06-10 Support IRA Tax Credit Amendment to Tax<br />

056 06-16 Univ of Nebr-Lincoln Physics grant<br />

057 06-17 Air Force Contract to Brunswick Corp. of<br />

058 06-17 USNS CORNHUSKER named assigned to crane<br />

059 06-24 Support Passage of Senate Tax Reform<br />

060 06-24 Sen. Dole Commits to Take up Supplementa<br />

061 06-24 Tax Reform Transitions for Nebr, Histori<br />

062 06-25 Objects to Smithsonian Research Funding<br />

063 06-25 Wheat Poll D.C. Press Conference (<strong>Exon</strong>-H<br />

064 06-25 Dole Says Supplemental to be Considered<br />

065 06-25 <strong>Exon</strong>-Zoro Announce Crete Airport Grant<br />

066 06-26 Lincoln Firm (Hygain) Gets $17.5 million<br />

067 06-27 <strong>Exon</strong> Lauds Approval of Supplemental Appr<br />

068 06-30 Wheat Poll Omaha Press Conference (<strong>Exon</strong>-


JULY<br />

069 07-01 Kiewit Construction Contract for Pipelin<br />

070 07-12 Gold Coin Design<br />

071 07-14 Disaster Aid Requested for Dawes County,<br />

072 07-17 Grain Storage Shortage Letter to Secreta<br />

073 07-22 North Loup Water Project Subcommittee He<br />

074 07-23 Farm Export Enhancement Extended to Chin<br />

075 07-23 President Responds to <strong>Exon</strong> 55 mph Letter<br />

076 07-23 FERC Old Gas Decontrol Letter<br />

077 07-25 Missouri Rec River Funding Increase Requ<br />

078 07-28 Prairie Bend Funding Increase Request<br />

079 07-29 Legislation for Additional Federal Judge<br />

080 07-30 Path Cleared for Advance Deficiency Paym<br />

081 07-31 <strong>Exon</strong> Amend. Approved Mandating Advance D<br />

AUGUST<br />

082 08-01 <strong>Exon</strong> Amend. Approved to Improve Air Traf<br />

083 08-01 Amend for Hay Contributions Approved<br />

084 08-02 Export Enhancement for Soviet Union Reac<br />

085 08-08 Response to Lincoln Journal on Trade Vet<br />

086 08-08 Committee Approves <strong>Exon</strong> Amend on Airport<br />

087 08-11 Senate Approves Military Construction Au<br />

088 08-12 Text of Contra Aid Speech<br />

089 08-14 Committee Approves $27 million in Nebr.<br />

090 08-15 Rumors of Wheat Poll Results<br />

091 08-15 Chadron Disaster Aid Appealed to Preside<br />

092 08-15 Wheat Poll Results Announced


093 08-18 Senate Approves Former President's Bill<br />

094 08-18 Airport grants for Tekamah & Minden<br />

095 08-19 Commonwealth provision included in Tax R<br />

096 08-20 Grant for Defense Logistics Agency in No<br />

097 08-26 Agriculture Committee Hearing Media Advi<br />

SEPTEMBER<br />

098 09-03 HUD Public Housing Loan Authority for Om<br />

099 09-04 React to USDA Ethanol Report<br />

100 09-10 Senators Block USDA move of SCS tech cen<br />

101 09-11 House Subcommittee Approves <strong>Exon</strong> Wildern<br />

102 09-11 React to Neb. Nat. Resources Commission<br />

103 09-12 Senate Ok's FAA Blue Ribbon Commission S<br />

104 09-12 U.S. Marshall & Judicial Nominations Con<br />

105 09-17 Pork-Buster Amendment Announced<br />

106 09-17 Alliance Airport Grant<br />

107 09-17 Votes Against Rehnquist for Chief Justic<br />

108 09-18 Offutt Modernization Contract Award<br />

109 09-19 Reconciliation is Phony<br />

110 09-20 Senate Rejects Pork-Buster Amendment<br />

111 09-22 May Offer Amendment to Increase Speed Li<br />

112 09-22 Unsnarls Wilderness Bill from being Bloc<br />

113 09-23 GATT Trade Talks Letter to President<br />

114 09-24 Senate Approves 55 Speed Limit Amendment<br />

115 09-24 Nebr. Projects in Tax Reform Bill<br />

116 09-25 Cornhusker Army Ammo Plant Cleanup Contr<br />

117 09-27 Votes Against the Tax Reform Bill<br />

118 09-29 HUD Loans to Nebraska


119 09-30 Hydropower Relicensing Accord with House<br />

OCTOBER<br />

120 10-01 Unused <strong>1986</strong> Office Funds Returned<br />

121 10-01 Urges DOT Action on Texas Air Purchase o<br />

122 10-02 Support Override of South Africa Sanctio<br />

123 10-03 Papio & Dam 18 Amend to Con Res Approved<br />

124 10-03 Con. Res. Includes $27 mil in Nebr. Wate<br />

125 10-03 Senate Passes <strong>Exon</strong> Wilderness Bill (S,81<br />

126 10-09 <strong>Exon</strong> Odometer Fraud Bill Sent to Preside<br />

127 10-09 87 Defense Authorization Conf Approves C<br />

128 10-09 Protests Tax Reform Loophole for Texas U<br />

129 10-10 Senate Approves Airport Liability Insura<br />

130 10-16 Physicians Mutual&Commonwealth in Senate<br />

131 10-18 Omnibus Water Bill Gets Final Congressio<br />

132 10-21 President Signs <strong>Exon</strong> Wilderness Bill (S.<br />

133 10-21 Pleased with Popularity of Gold Coin Sal<br />

134 10-28 President Signs <strong>Exon</strong> Odometer Fraud Bill<br />

NOVEMBER<br />

135 11-12 Aviation Subcommittee on Safety & Aviati<br />

136 11-13 <strong>Exon</strong> to Visit China<br />

137 11-13 <strong>Exon</strong> Helps Goodyear Fight Hostile Takeov<br />

138 11-14 React to President Reagan Iran Arms Sale<br />

139 11-14 Letter to U.S. Mint on Gold Coin Distrib<br />

140 11-18 Testimony to House Committee on Goodyear


DECEMBER<br />

141 12-15 Donates Continental Congress Papers Inde<br />

142 12-16 1987 Academy nominations<br />

143 12-17 Donates Continental Papers Index to UN-L<br />

144 12-23 Don't Sell the Power Marketing Administr<br />

145 12-29 Minden & Hall County Receive Airport Gra<br />

146 12-31 Dept of Energy to Notify Gov of nuclear


.<br />

SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

~ SJ J Ee an<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

Fo:rRelease, Friday, January 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON ASKS USDA TO CLARIFY GRAMM-RUDMAN IMPACT ON FARM LOANS<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U .S . SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB), has<br />

asl


USS JJ EXON<br />

GRAMM-RUDMAN<br />

IMPACT ON FARM PROGRAM<br />

to explain how Gramm-Rudman will impact the entire farm program.<br />

‘Farmers need to know how Gramm-Rudman will affect them if<br />

they have signed-up for the program and have a contract before<br />

the sequester order takes effect,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Will farmers be<br />

exempted from Gramm-Rudman payment cuts if they have a signed<br />

contract or what other factors might affect their payments?” he<br />

added.<br />

Other questions <strong>Exon</strong> asked the Department to answer include:<br />

-- How reductions in payments would be implemented?<br />

-- <strong>The</strong> timing of deficiency payments?<br />

-- Whether <strong>1986</strong> crop payments will be reduced beyond the<br />

March sequester order?<br />

-- 30 --


J. JAMFS [:XON<br />

i’ N<br />

3 S H B<br />

W<br />

2<br />

A<br />

C<br />

ARMEDSERVICES<br />

f<br />

COMMERCE,SCIENCE, AND<br />

TRANSPORTATION<br />

6UOGET<br />

vo2 F B I<br />

L 6<br />

8 F B<br />

o 6<br />

WASHINGTON, DC 20510<br />

January 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />

2 F f B t<br />

N P 6<br />

<strong>The</strong> Iionorable John R. Block<br />

Secretary of Agriculture<br />

u. s. Departmen L of Agriculture<br />

Wash irlgton,D.C. 20250<br />

I Dear f;ecreLary Block :<br />

rJCIW EhaL the Food Sec uriLy Ack o f 1985 ‘has passed and has<br />

been irnplemented, and the Gramm-Rudman proposa 1 has begun to take<br />

its fu,rther to11 on hard-pressed farmers, it is important that<br />

produc!ers have a fair opportunity to intel1igently plan their<br />

sprin~ plan Ling. At best, there are unanswered quest ions th,nL<br />

demant[ immed iate c Larification.<br />

We are concerned tha k the impact o E the Gramtn-Rudman proposa 1<br />

Otla(~Kicu1.Lure po 1.icy i,:Stl(~ L ye L fuL.1y un(]eKs LOO(I . yi>u<br />

please out 1ine your Depa rtmen t‘s impl.emen tation of the cur ren L<br />

fiseal year $1.3 bi 11ion cut mandated by the Gramm-Rudman<br />

c1men(l111 en(:il 11d p l:3 ns for the 1.987fisca 1 year .<br />

0 A firsL priority for cLarificat ion and hopeful reversa 1 is<br />

yollrDepartment ‘s pub 1ic a t that non recourse 1oans w i11<br />

n<br />

b~:re(lU 4,3 percent because of Gramm-Rudman. One example<br />

given by your Department is that the effect ive <strong>1986</strong> corn loan<br />

figure of $1.92 wi11 be reduced by 4.3 percent to $1.84. We<br />

quest ion and object to this 1ine of calcu Iation. A loan is a<br />

l~i~ n a[idshouId not be a ffected by Gramm-Rudman . You r<br />

ca‘Lulations pre-suppose that a bushel of corn wi11 eventually<br />

se 11 below the loan pr ice of $1’.92. Do you not agree that this<br />

penal izing of the farmer a ful1 4.3 percent of $1.92 is false<br />

arithreetic? In the event o f de fau1t, the U.S. Government has<br />

grain which has value, whereas your calculations to arr iv.ea the<br />

reducti.on figure assume it wou Ld be worth nokh ing.<br />

We also would appreciate an explanation of your Department’s<br />

intentions as to the announcement of sign-up dates for the<br />

commodity programs; which farmers, if any, would be exempt from a<br />

possible March sequester order due to signed contracts or other<br />

factors; how reductions in payments would be implemented; the<br />

timing of deficiency payments; whether <strong>1986</strong> ‘crop payments will be<br />

reduced beyond the March sequester order; and whether the<br />

Department anticipates any change in the historic crop planting<br />

mi)cor production levels due to an imminent sequester.


<strong>The</strong> Honorable John R. Block<br />

Page 2<br />

We urge you to immediately announce the sign-up dates for the<br />

various commodity programs.<br />

This information is crucial to the nation’s agricultural<br />

sector. We hope you will be able to provide us with a timely<br />

response.<br />

With best wishes.<br />

Sincerelyt<br />

/


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

@s~nat(-)r J J E<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

FO:RRELEASE, TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SPACE SHUTTLE EXPLOSION<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said he was<br />

“saddened and shocked” by the explos ion of the Space Shuttle<br />

moments after is was 1aunched.<br />

“This is a trag ic blow to the momentum<br />

of the Space Shuttle<br />

program, but it should not endanger the future of the shuttle<br />

o program, “ <strong>Exon</strong> said . <strong>Exon</strong> is a member of the Senate Commerce<br />

Committee which has jurisdiction over the National Aeronautics<br />

and Space and Administration.<br />

“My prayers<br />

are with the families and friends of the<br />

courageous seven-member crew,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> entire nation<br />

feels the tragic loss of the Shuttle crew,” he added.<br />

At the<br />

time of the Shuttle accident, <strong>Exon</strong> was attending a top secret CIA<br />

briefing.<br />

-


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. ~ J J S E e a n<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Rc?1ease: Wednesday, January 29, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— LYNG NOMINATED FOR SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C . -- “<strong>The</strong> nomination of Richard Lyng to be<br />

the n(:xt Secretary of Agriculture is not surprising. He is wel 1<br />

qual iI:iedand very familiar with the internal operations<br />

of the<br />

Department of Agriculture. He wi11 maintain the status quo and<br />

●<br />

keep<br />

t:heoperation running smoothly. While he may be a good<br />

Administrator, it is important that everyone realize he is being<br />

appointed by President Reagan and will continue the inadequate<br />

farm policies<br />

of this Administration, ” <strong>Exon</strong> said about the<br />

nomination of Richard Lyng to be Secretary of Agriculture.<br />

“Since he will be hired to carryout President Reagan’s farm<br />

policies, I do not expect he will be a strong spokesman for the<br />

family sized farm or ranch operations. I do not anticipate any<br />

improvement or dramatic change in the direction of the Department<br />

of Agriculture because it is still the President who will call<br />

the st~otsand make the decisions affecting the Department of<br />

Agrict~lture,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

-


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

S J Je E n<br />

.<br />

a<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2<br />

A T 2S<br />

For Release Tuesday, February 4, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON ADVOCATES TRADE EXPANS ION LEGISLATION<br />

liASHINGTON, D .C . -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON<br />

(D-NEB) is<br />

cospor~soring 1egis1ation<br />

(S.2033 ) to expand the United States<br />

export:markets by un iting the “smokestack and haystack areas of<br />

the country into one driving export force.“<br />

Elxonsaid the b i11 is unique because<br />

it does not single out<br />

any one industry for protection while sacrificing another for<br />

● retaliation by a foreign competitor. <strong>The</strong> bill proposes to<br />

establish a fund of million at the Export-Import Bank to<br />

countc!r foreign credit subsidies used to undercut U.S. exports on<br />

the wc)rldmarket.<br />

“’International trade is of vital importance to our nation’s<br />

agric~[lture sector since fully one-third<br />

of our food production<br />

is de~roted to exportru <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>The</strong> trade legislation would<br />

“pry clpenforeign markets, fight unfair trade practices and add<br />

an elchment of reciprocity to our trade relationships,m he added.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill emphasizes<br />

increasing exports rather than closing<br />

the American markets. It authorizes the President to negotiate<br />

a<br />

Agreement<br />

to bring foreign agricultural practices under the General<br />

on Trade and Tariffs.<br />

‘This bill signals to the foreign competition that the U.S.<br />

intends to become the world’s best salesman and that the U.S.<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXON<br />

TRADE EXPANSION BILL<br />

government is willing to protect and promote U.S. KightS in the<br />

international marketplace.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposal includes an incentive program to improve the<br />

quality of export grain. <strong>The</strong> government would offer commodity<br />

payments-in-kind in exchange for improvement in grain quality.<br />

Another provision instructs the Administration to evaluate<br />

the feasibility of selling surplus agricultural commodities in<br />

exchange for local currency in indebted third world countries<br />

where hard currency<br />

supplies are low.<br />

-<br />

COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC2O51O<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J eE<br />

na<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

330 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T S 2<br />

For R~:lease, Tuesday night, February 4, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON C!OMMENTS ON STATE OF UNION<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C.<br />

absolute masterpiece,<br />

-- “<strong>The</strong> President s speech tonight was an<br />

by far the best I have ever heard him give<br />

and hc:has g iven alot of good speeches. It was wel 1 written. It<br />

was f1awlessly del ivered. He is a true pro when it comes to<br />

making speeches. <strong>The</strong>re was not to much nitty-gritty in the<br />

speech though. <strong>The</strong> nitty-gritty starts tomorrow when the Senate<br />

Budget Committee begins hearings on the President’s budget. From<br />

the aclvanced information that we have the President is going to<br />

recommend some devastating cuts for for agriculture which is<br />

going to adversely affect farmers, ranchers and small<br />

businesspeople already in distress in Nebraska. <strong>The</strong> speech was<br />

good, positive and upbeat; now tomorrow we start getting into the<br />

heart of the situation and make the changes we are going to have<br />

to make to spare Nebraska’s economy from what I am very fearful<br />

the President is going to propose in the budget details,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />

said.<br />

‘President Reagan was speaking to the nation tonight and the<br />

natiorl is generally upbeat. That is not the same situation with<br />

the ec:onomy in Nebraska today. While we need some optimism and<br />

optimistic talk we also need some positive action on the part of<br />

the President to alleviate agriculture and ranching and farming<br />

in a way that our economy can be improved in a devastated<br />

Nebraska; where we still have optimism, but we need some help<br />

from E)resident Reagan to make our optimism come true,” he added.<br />

-


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

O JS J Ee an<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T S 2<br />

For Release, Thursday, February 6, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON C’RGES USDA TO STOP DELAYING FOOD STAMP RULES FOR FARMERS<br />

M’ASHINGTON, D .C. -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) Thursday<br />

released a letter urging the Secretary of Agriculture to<br />

implement the new regulations regard ing food stamp appl icat ions<br />

from farmers .<br />

o<br />

“<strong>The</strong> economic conditions facing many of America s farmers<br />

and ranchers are getting progressively worse. Ironically, many<br />

of our farmers and ranchers are forced to seek assistance in<br />

acquiring the processed food products that they have so<br />

efficiently helped produce,~ <strong>Exon</strong> wrote to the Secretary of<br />

Agriculture.<br />

“Current food stamp regulations make it difficult for these<br />

Americans to qualify for food stamps. Section 1509 of the Farm<br />

Bill contains a provision which will correct an inequity in food<br />

stamp regulations as they relate to farmers and ranchers. This<br />

provision would allow farmers who have off-farm jobs and who<br />

apply for food stamps to count their total loss on the farm, as<br />

well as all wages earned off the farm, to arrive at total<br />

income,” <strong>Exon</strong> wrote.<br />

“It is my understanding that implementation of these<br />

regulations is being delayed. I urge you to immediately<br />

implement these provisions and bring relief to this critical<br />

situation. Certainlyr the Department of Agriculture can<br />

understand this situation and is in a position to take prompt<br />

action in accordance with the law which Congress passed over six<br />

weeks ago,” <strong>Exon</strong> concluded in his letter to the Secretary of<br />

Agriculture.<br />

.- 30 --


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J e E ! a n<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T<br />

2S<br />

For Re11ease, Friday, February 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—.— EXON SIJPPORTS TEST OF RADIO & TELEVISION COVERAGE OF SENATE<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C . -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) said<br />

supper ts a test of 1ive gavel-to-gavel rad io broadcast and a<br />

he<br />

clclsed circuit television coverage<br />

of the Senate chamber<br />

prctceecl ings .<br />

“j:t is time the Senate entered<br />

the electron ic age,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />

sa id. “I have always supported proposals for 1ive radio coverage<br />

● of the Senate and the concept of television coverage, but have<br />

expressed concerned<br />

about the cost of implementing gavel-to-gavel<br />

tv coverage,”<br />

he added.<br />

<strong>The</strong> closed circuit television test would be available only<br />

to the Congressional office buildings in Washington, D.C. and the<br />

news media galleries reporting on the Congress. <strong>The</strong> radio<br />

broadczlst would be available on the public frequencies.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> test will allow the Senate<br />

to evaluate what rule<br />

changes will be necessary, so televising the Senate does not<br />

impede the legislative process,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Studies indicate<br />

that the public receives the majority of their news and<br />

informtltion from television. Electronic coverage of the Senate<br />

●<br />

proceedings<br />

can be an asset by providing a direct link between<br />

the Ser~a’teand the public,”<br />

he added.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> pointed out that the Senate is already open to<br />

MOM


USS JJ EXON<br />

TELEVISING THE SENATE<br />

observation<br />

by the general public and that the news media reports<br />

daily on Senate committees and floor actions. He also noted<br />

that, even though Senate chamber action<br />

is not currently<br />

televised, Senate hearings are regularly telecast by C-SPAN, the<br />

group which televises<br />

the House of Representatives.<br />

.- 30 --<br />

COMMllTEEONTHEDUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC20510<br />

OFF!CIALBUSINESS


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J eE<br />

na<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

FOR RE;LEASE, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON ASKS FARM CREDIT TO EXPLAIN INTEREST RATE INCREASE<br />

VIASHINGTON, D .C.<br />

the FzlrmCredit Banks<br />

-- u .s. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) asked<br />

of Omaha about the reported increase in<br />

interest loan rates.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following<br />

is<br />

the text of the letter <strong>Exon</strong> sent to John<br />

●<br />

Harl irlg,president of the Farm Credit Banks of Omaha.<br />

“Dear Mr. Har1ing:”<br />

“I have been advised that since the ba il-out of the<br />

E’armCredit System, the recently merged Production Credit<br />

Association of the Midlands has increased its interest rates<br />

by .15% (fifteen hundredths of one percent ).”<br />

“I am writing to verify that information. If that is<br />

indeed the case, how long do you expect this increase to be<br />

in effect? What is the cause of this increase?”<br />

“During the last several months there has been a<br />

general downward trend in interest rates. Given this<br />

situation, I find this increase difficult to justify.”<br />

“Your prompt response and explanation will be<br />

appreciated.U


J. JAMES EXON<br />

N<br />

3 S H U<br />

~ 2<br />

t<br />

C<br />

ARMEDSERVICES<br />

COMMERCE,SCIENCE, AND<br />

TRANSPORTATION<br />

BUDGET<br />

c<br />

2 F B<br />

I 6<br />

0 F B<br />

O 6<br />

2 F U<br />

N P 6<br />

WASHINGTON, DC 20510<br />

February 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />

Mr. John Harlinq, President<br />

Farm Credit Ban~s of Omaha<br />

South 19th Street<br />

Omiiha,Nebraska 68102<br />

DeiarMr. Har1ing:<br />

I have been advised that since the bail-out of the Farm<br />

Credit System, the recently merged Production Credit Association<br />

of the Midlands has increased its interest rates by .15% (fifteen<br />

hundredths of one percent).<br />

I am writing to verify that information. If that is indeed<br />

Lhe case, how long do you expect this increase to ‘be in effect?<br />

\Wlat is the cause of this increase?<br />

During the last several months there has been a general<br />

●<br />

downward trend in interest rateS. Given this situation, I find<br />

k this increase difficult to justify.<br />

Your prompt response and explanation will be appreciated.<br />

ed States<br />

Senator


330 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T S 2<br />

For Release ~ Tuesday, February 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON ANNOUNCES U.S. SENATE-JAPAN SCHOLARSHIP WINNER<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) announced<br />

today that Sara E. Adkins of Laurel, Nebraska, has been selected<br />

to pa~ticipate in the U.S. Senate - Japanese Youth Exchange<br />

Program.<br />

f;ara is a junior at Laurel-Concord Public Schools at Laurel,<br />

Nebraska. As a participant Sara is one of two Nebraska youths<br />

who will receive a full scholarship to spend two months this<br />

summer with a host family in Japan. <strong>The</strong> other Nebraska winner is<br />

17-year-old Michael Moberg of Papillion, who was selected by<br />

Senator Ed Zorinsky (D-NEB).<br />

‘l!heU.S. Senate – Japan Scholarship is awarded annually to<br />

two st:udents from each state. As scholarship winners, the two<br />

Nebraska students will first travel to Washington, D.C. to meet<br />

with Nebraska’s U.S. Senators Jim <strong>Exon</strong> and Ed Zorinsky and<br />

Japanese Embassy officials. While in the nation’s capital, the<br />

participants will attend an orientation on the Japanese language<br />

and c~llture before traveling to Japan.<br />

f;ara is a member of the National Honor Society and<br />

participates in many student activities. She is a state


USS JJ EXON<br />

U.S. SENATE JAPAN SCHOLARSHIP WINNERS<br />

medalist in extemporaneous speech contests, co-editor of the<br />

student annual, and a member of the student council. In addition<br />

Sara is a varsity cheerleader, a starter on the school’s’varsity<br />

volleyball and basketball teams, and active in vocal and<br />

instrumental music. She has been very active in 4-I1 for nine<br />

years and also in community and church projects.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Senate - Japan Scholarship progzam was established in<br />

1981 to increase understanding and awareness between United<br />

States and Japan. <strong>The</strong> program is administered by Youth for<br />

Understanding, a non-profit international exchange student<br />

organization.<br />

Senator <strong>Exon</strong> congratulated both students and said Sara and<br />

Michael will do an excellent job representating Nebraska during<br />

their visit to Japan. ‘I have complete confidence that Sara and<br />

Michael will proudly represent Nebraska and our country in this<br />

●<br />

important exchange prog~am,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

-<br />

>


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

~ SJ J Ee an<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T<br />

2S<br />

For R=lease, Thursday, February 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON E;NTERS HOSPITAL FOR EYE SURGERY<br />

——<br />

LINCOLN , NEBR. -- U.S. Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong> checked into<br />

Method ist Hospital in Omaha Thursday for repair surgery to his<br />

left eye.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said doctors had d iscovered<br />

a smal1 local ized tear on<br />

the side of his left retina.<br />

● 1 He said it was not an emergency , but he wanted to have it<br />

corrected while at home.<br />

Dr. John Pemberton will repair the tissue Thursday<br />

afternoon, and the Senator is expected to leave the hospital this<br />

weekend. <strong>Exon</strong> said the doctor anticipated no problems, and he is<br />

expected to return to his Washington, D.C. duties sometime next<br />

week after a few days of recuperation<br />

at his Lincoln home.<br />

-.


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J e E ! a n<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

I<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A ~ T 2 ~<br />

, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY<br />

EXON WliNTS TO CLOSE LOOPHOLES IN IMPORTED ETHANOL LAWS<br />

LI:NCOLN, NEBR. .- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is cosponsoring<br />

1egislat ion (S.2051) to close loopholes which fuel ethanol importers<br />

have used to avoid U.S. tariffs.<br />

“llthanol imports have ducked u.S. tariffs because of loopholes in<br />

the 1aws,” <strong>Exon</strong> said, who has been an advocate for developing U.S.<br />

ethano1.plants . Under current law, ethanol imports intended for use<br />

● as fuel.must pay a Congressionally mandated 60-cent per gallon<br />

tariff. Congress levied the import tariff to promote the domestic<br />

ethanol industry and to offset fuel tax incentives intended for<br />

domestically produced ethanol.<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislation is designed to close three major loopholes in the<br />

law by making all types of imported ethanol subject to the 60-cent per<br />

gallon tariff. Current law permits an importer three years, after<br />

importation, to declare the use of the ethanol before paying the<br />

tariff if it is used for fuel purposes. Under S.2051, the tariff<br />

would be collected at the time of importation and be refunded upon<br />

proof that the ethanol<br />

is not being used for fuel purposes.<br />

o<br />

eligibility<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill also clarifies the Caribbean Basin Intiative (CBI)<br />

rules to prevent ethanol from being shipped through<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXON<br />

—— BILL TO CLOSE ETHANOL IMPORT LOOPHOLES —<br />

Caribbean nations and then upgraded to fuel quality to avoid the U.S.<br />

tariffs. Under the current interpretation of the CBI, ethanol from<br />

non..CBInations can be upgraded in CBI countries to fuel quality and<br />

then imported tariff-free into the U.S. In addition, the bill would<br />

extend the 60-cent tariff to include imported fuels that are blended<br />

with ethanol.<br />

“Some importers are simply laundering ethanol fuels through the<br />

Caribbean to avoid the U.S. tariffs,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> federal ethanol<br />

import laws are as important to agriculture as the domestic ethanol<br />

inhustry and should be tightened up and enforced. Ethanol is an<br />

expanding agricultural market,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

In a related matter, <strong>Exon</strong> said he was pleased the U.S. Trade<br />

Representative’s office has announced it will review the practice of<br />

blending ethanol imports with chemicals to avoid U.S. tariffs. <strong>Exon</strong>,<br />

was one of nine Senators who earlier this month requested U.S. Trade<br />

Representative Clayton Yeutter to investigate this p~actice of<br />

blending ethanol to avoid the Congressionally mandated 60-cent per<br />

gallon<br />

tariff.<br />

~~b,all<br />

~nft~ $tOttS %aott<br />

COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS<br />

--30--


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

o SJ J eE<br />

an<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

Fo:rRelease, Thursday, February 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON HONORED BY RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION<br />

——<br />

WASHINGTON, D .C. -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEBR) was<br />

honored Wednesday evening by the Renewable Fuels Association for<br />

his leadership in the promotion of ethanol.<br />

<strong>The</strong> national associat ion gave <strong>Exon</strong> the “Award for<br />

Outstand ing Contr ibutions to the Fuel Ethanol Industry. ”<br />

Receiving the award on <strong>Exon</strong>’s behalf was Ralph O’Connor of the<br />

Nebraska Gasohol Commission. <strong>Exon</strong> was recuperating from eye<br />

surgery at his home in Lincoln, Nebraska and could not attend the<br />

ceremony.<br />

Eric Vaughn, President of the Renewable Fuels Association,<br />

said <strong>Exon</strong> was selected to receive the award because of his<br />

“commitment to the domestic fuel ethanol industry” and<br />

“leadership on numerous legislative issues of importance to the<br />

industry.~<br />

“As a direct result of your (Senator <strong>Exon</strong>’s) support, the<br />

domestic ethanol industry, in 1985, will produce more than 625<br />

million gallons of ethanol, consuming over 240 million bushels of<br />

co:~n, and adding over $900 million to farm incomern Vaughn said<br />

in a letter<br />

to <strong>Exon</strong>.<br />

-- 30 --


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J e E ! a n<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

—.<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T S 2<br />

For Release, Fr iday, February 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON SAYS 60% CUT OF FmHA OPERATING LOANS ADDS TO CREDIT DROUGHT<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U .S . SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) Friday said<br />

the Admini strat ion is scheduling drastic reduct ions in lending to<br />

Nel~raska s most hard pressed<br />

farm and ranch operations.<br />

“Nearly sixty percent of the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA)<br />

operating loan programs for Nebraska are being eliminated during the<br />

.)<br />

worst farm depression since the 1930s, ” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Last year the Nebraska FmHA office made direct operating loans<br />

totaling $141,840,820. This year the Administration has allocated<br />

$55,109,000 to Nebraska for direct loans, <strong>Exon</strong> said, but only $21<br />

million<br />

is left to last through the end of the year.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said he will be contacting Assistant Agriculture Secretary<br />

Frank Naylor about how the Administration’s deep reductions are<br />

ma’king the depression in agriculture worse. “Assistant Secretary<br />

Naylor needs to know there is a credit drought which will force many<br />

farmers out of business this year,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Last year the FmHA guaranteed $155,092,880 in operating loans<br />

co]nmercial banks made to Nebraska farmers. This year the allocation<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXON<br />

FmHA LOANS CUT BY 60 PERCENT<br />

is only $62,864,000, of which only $28 million is remaining for the<br />

a<br />

rest of the year.<br />

“This lack of credit is going to drive many credit-worthy<br />

farmers out of business,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Even the best run farm<br />

operations need credit, but with the Administration making such<br />

radical reductions<br />

in the direct loans and loan guarantees many<br />

family farm operat: ons will have no place<br />

to turn,” he added.<br />

--30--<br />

~ 3<br />

COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC 20S10<br />

offl~ BUSINESS


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

m SJ J eE<br />

n<br />

a<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release, Friday, February 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON CALLS MOVE OF SCS WORKERS BUREAUCRATIC BUMBLE<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON labeled the announced<br />

plans to move the Midwest Technical Service Center of the Soil<br />

Conservation Serv ice (SCS) office to Fort Worth, Texas as a<br />

11bu reaucratic bumble at best. “<br />

Wilson Scaling, Chief of the Soil Conservation Service, has<br />

recommended plans to move the 150 employees in Lincoln, many of them<br />

highly skilled technicians, to Fort Worth this yearO Scaling is from<br />

Texas and obviously wants all the SCS offices located in Texas, <strong>Exon</strong><br />

noted.<br />

“Evidently Mr. Scaling and the Administration compare size with<br />

efficiency, which I very much question, as they proceed with plans to<br />

move the offices in Nebraska, Oregon and Pennsylvania<br />

said.<br />

to Texas,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

If one location is most efficient, then Nebraska<br />

would be the<br />

ideal choice to serve the entire nation. It is centrally located and<br />

has good air service, <strong>Exon</strong> said. “We are accessible to much of the<br />

central region by ground transportation with the benefits of<br />

Interstate<br />

80,” he added.<br />

“I will be asking for answers on cost comparisons; such as<br />

MO~


USS JJ EXON<br />

SCS OFFICE CLOSING<br />

federal subsistence rates in Fort Worth at $75 per day versus $58 per<br />

day in Lincoln, the cost of the new office space in Fort Worth versus<br />

the vast amount of available federal office space in Lincoln and the<br />

cost of the mover”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“This move is a grave injustice to the midwest states who need<br />

the highly skilled technical services provided and also to the 150<br />

employees who will either be terminated or forced ko relocate,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />

said.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said he will urge the U.S. Department<br />

of Agriculture<br />

officials in Washington, D.C. to reject the SCS merger so the office<br />

will remain in Lincoln.<br />

-<br />

COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J e E : a n<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release, Tuesday, February 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON RECUPERATING FOR REMAINDER OF WEEK<br />

—<br />

WASHINGTON , D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON S doctors have<br />

suggested he not return to his ful1, normal duties in Washington,<br />

D.C. for the balance<br />

of the current week.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> underwent eye surgery<br />

to repair a tear in his left<br />

●’<br />

rekina on February 13th in Omaha. <strong>The</strong> Senator ‘s Omaha physician<br />

and his Washington, D.C. specialist said the operation was<br />

successful, but that delays in the return of normal internal eye<br />

pressure is delaying <strong>Exon</strong>’s return to his normally full schedule<br />

of activities.<br />

T“heSenator<br />

is in daily contact with his office by telephone<br />

from his Washington, D.C. residence. He is reportedly in good<br />

spirits and anxious to return to his full working<br />

routine.<br />

-


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

●S J Je E n<br />

a<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release Wednesday, February 26, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON & ZORINSKY OPPOSE DEREGULATION OF “OLD” NATURAL GAS PRICES<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C . -- Nebraska U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON and<br />

ED ZOE.INSKY are strongly objecting to the Department of Energys<br />

proposal that would more than triple the price of “old” natural<br />

gas.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Department of Energy (DOE) “proposal wil 1 more than<br />

triple the cost of approximately two-thirds of the natural gas<br />

● consumed in the western three-fourths of Nebraska, ” the Senators<br />

sa id. “For this major increase in cost the DOE proposal provides<br />

absolutely no benefits to consumer s,” they added.<br />

— “Old” natural<br />

gas<br />

is natural gas which was contracted before1978.<br />

In a joint statement to the Federal Energy Regulatory<br />

Commission (FERC) the Nebraska Senators said the DOE proposal<br />

could increase the price to $ per Thousand Cubic Feet (mcf).<br />

Old gas is currently selling for as low as 74-cents per mcf.<br />

Under the Natural Gas Policy Act of<br />

(NPGA), ‘old” gas was<br />

protecred<br />

and its price would not be deregulated.<br />

‘!rheDOE proposal will unnecessarily and unlawfully raise<br />

the cost of natural gas to consumers in Nebraska,w the Senators<br />

o<br />

said. <strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky pointed out that nearly percent of<br />

Nebraska’s homes are heated with natural gas and over percent<br />

MORE


USS EXON & ZORINSKY<br />

OPPOSING DEREGULATION OF “OLD” NATURAL GAS<br />

of the state’s<br />

irrigation pumps are powered with either natural<br />

●<br />

gas or propane:<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> an~.Zorinsky said the DOE should address the industry<br />

problem of natural gas supply contract renegotiations between the<br />

pipeline companies and the gas producers. ‘<strong>The</strong>re is no mechanism<br />

in the DOE proposal to attack the real problems facing the<br />

industry renegotiation of high cost contracts or take-or-pay<br />

contracts,” the Senators said. Take-or-pay contracts require a<br />

pipeline company to take natural gas contracted for or pay for it<br />

even though it may not be used.<br />

-<br />

COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC 26510<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS<br />

-.


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J e E n a .<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release, Wednesday, February 26, <strong>1986</strong><br />

.— OD13LL HANSON DIES<br />

WASHINGTON , D.C. -- “Odel1 Hanson was truly one of the<br />

most g ifted reporters who covered the Nebraska scene in the 1ast<br />

few decades . He wrote with accuracy and integrity. He never<br />

alnowed personal opinion to creep into any of the stories he<br />

●<br />

wrote. He wrote the facts; pure and unembellished . Odel 1 Hanson<br />

was a ]nodel reporter that every journalism student should<br />

emu1ate. Odell Hanson will be missed. His integrity will stand<br />

as a monument<br />

to his memory, ” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Odell Hanson was the Lincoln Bureau Chief<br />

for AP from<br />

1 He died of cancer this morning.<br />

-


3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release, Thursday, February 27, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— STAMP TO HONOR BOYS TOWN<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Postal Service has informed<br />

Us. SENATOR JIM EXON of its decision to issue a stamp to honor<br />

Bays Town in Omaha.<br />

13xonhas been working for nearly two years encouraging the<br />

Postal Service to issue a stamp honoring Boys Town. <strong>The</strong> stamp<br />

would commemorate the IOOth anniversary of the birth of<br />

● Father Edward J. Flanagan who founded Boys Town.<br />

~?hestamp is expected to be a regular issue four-cent<br />

postage stamp issued as part of the Great American Series. It is<br />

expected to be issued by the Postal Service on July and<br />

carry the image of Father Flanagan.<br />

-


O E Z d w<br />

N e b r<br />

. — —<br />

SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />

COntaCt:Art Jaeger<br />

l“Jashi~ton, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />

FOR I!@!~IA!rERELEASE:Wrch 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />

..<br />

SENATEPASSESZORINSKYBILL ON EXPANDING=RON<br />

STATE PARK<br />

Washing’:on, D.C............<strong>The</strong> Senatehas passed legislationintroducedby Senator<br />

Mward ZoriI~sky(D.-Neb.) transferring<br />

acres of adjacentfederalforestland to<br />

ChadronSta”zePark for develo~ent as a campground.<br />

Zorinsk:fsaid the bill, which passedwithouta dissentingvote Mrch<br />

is the only<br />

solutionto a long-statiingproblm of inadequatecampingfacilitiesat the park.<br />

●<br />

SenatorJ. James<strong>Exon</strong> (D.-Neb.) is a cosponsorof the measure,which still needsHouse<br />

approval.<br />

“~adro]~State Park attractssme 2 visitorsa year,” Zorinskysaid, “but it has<br />

no campgroulti ad<br />

no lafi suitablefor Campgroutidevelo~ent.”<br />

Undertl~eZorinsky-<strong>Exon</strong>bill, acreswould be transferredfra the Nebraska<br />

NationalForestto the NebraskaGame and Parksmission<br />

for only the administrative<br />

costsof conveyance,includingthe cost of appraisingand surveyingthe land.<br />

All dev=lopent, such as campingfacilitiesand nature trails,would b<br />

paid for by<br />

the state.<br />

‘Transferof the landwould greatlyenhancepublicuse of ChadronState Park and we<br />

simplyhave no otheralternativefor developingcampingfacilitestheref”Zorinskysaid.<br />


uo~o $$enator<br />

● ) E Z<br />

N e b r<br />

SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />

W D 2<br />

Contact:Art Jaeger<br />

(202)224-6551<br />

I’mIATE ~LEASE: mrch 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />

ZORINSKY,EXON UR~<br />

NAYLORTO WE<br />

SUR=US GRAINAVAILABLEFOR ~~NOL<br />

Washington,D.C............NebraskaSenatorsEdwardZorinskyand<br />

J. James<strong>Exon</strong> have<br />

urgedActingAgricultureSecretaryFrankW. NaylorJr. to make surplusgovernmentgrain<br />

availablefreeor at reducedcost for processi~ intoethanol.<br />

Irla letter,the two senatorsdrew Naylor’sattentionto Zorinsky-sponsored language<br />

in the 1985 farmbill allowingUSDA to make the grain availablefrcm surplusCcnnncdity<br />

Credit,Cor]~rationstocks.<br />

●)<br />

‘<strong>The</strong>reis great interestin thisprovisionin our hae<br />

Stateof Nebraskaand elsewhere<br />

in themidwest,where overwhelmingsurplusesand policiesembodiedin the farmbill<br />

cunbineto continuethe downwardspiralof c~odity prices,~Zorinskyad <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y offeredto assistUSDA in formulatin guidelinesfor the distributionof grain<br />

for ethanoland asked for a reporton progressmade in this area to date.<br />

“In an effortto providesane relieffrun the econmic turmoilking experiencedby<br />

midwesternagriculture,”the senatorssaid, ‘we urge you to exerciseyour authorityin<br />

pursuingthismatterat your earliestpossibleconvenience.n<br />

m


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J eE<br />

na<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

FOICRelease, Tuesday, March 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—.-—— EXON URGES ACTION TO PREVENT MORE RURAL BANK FAILURES<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) Tuesday urged<br />

quick<br />

Senate act ion to reverse the increasing number of farm<br />

fo]:eclosures and bank fai1ures in rural America.<br />

Test ifying before the Senate Banking Committee, Senator <strong>Exon</strong><br />

ur


USS JJ EXON<br />

RURAL BANKS<br />

are supposedly too large to fail.” <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator said the<br />

failure of rural banks is as detrimental to farm communities as the<br />

failure of a multi-national<br />

bank could be to the national banking<br />

system.<br />

‘It is important that the government make every effort to keep<br />

families on their farms,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “As President Reagan said in his<br />

State of the Union speech, ‘Farmers must not be abandoned with<br />

problems they did not create and cannot control. ’”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said hs will continue<br />

to push the federal ~egulatory<br />

agencies and the Senate Banking Committee for action to aid rural<br />

America.<br />

-<br />

COMM17TEEONTHEBUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />

o~lCIAl BUSINESS


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. S J J ( E : a n<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release, Wednesday, March 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON I’LEASEDBY RELEASE OF FMHA MONEY<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C. -- Nebraska farm state U.S. Senator Jim<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> (D-NEB) said Wednesday he was pleased that the President had<br />

annourlced an add itional $750 mi11 ion in Farmers<br />

Home<br />

Adm inistrat ion (FmHA) loan funds.<br />

E;xonwas the first member of the Congress to publicly direct<br />

attent:ion to the shortage of FmHA loan funds .<br />

●’ ‘“Idon’t care who gets the publicity, the problem has been<br />

partially<br />

solved, ” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

--30--


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. S J J e E n<br />

a<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

330 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release, Wednesday, March 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON ENCOURAGED BY FDIC CHANGES<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB), who<br />

testif’ied before the Senate Banking Committee Tuesday advocating<br />

necess;ary changes<br />

in bank 1aws to aid the ai1ing agricu1tura1<br />

economy, said he was “encouraged by subsequently announced<br />

changes by federal bank regulator s.”<br />

E’ederal bank regulators announced they would ease pressure<br />

on rural banks by permitting them to reduce cash reserves and<br />

take special bookkeeping<br />

techniques.<br />

E:xon,who has held several meetings<br />

with top Federal<br />

Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and Federal Reserve Board<br />

officials said, “It wasn’t easy, but our efforts finally paid<br />

off. I wish the regulators would have reacted much earlier as we<br />

requested.”<br />

E;xon,one of the Senate’s leading advocates of relief for<br />

the h~lrting rural economy said further action was necessary and<br />

that corrective legislation he was sponsoring would come out of<br />

the S6!nateBanking Committee<br />

in the near future.<br />

-


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

S J e J E] al<br />

.)<br />

N’ewsRelease<br />

330 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

I r Release , Thursday, March 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—. EXON WANTS USDA TO CUTBACK ON SOIL SURVEY PUBLICATIONS<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has called on<br />

the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to stop wasting money by<br />

printing excess ive numbers of county soil survey reports .<br />

<strong>Exon</strong>, a farm state leader , said the USDA<br />

is wasting money each<br />

time a county soil survey report is done by printing excessive copies<br />

for the USDA and for Members<br />

of Congress.<br />

o <strong>Exon</strong> said a typical example of this wasteful process is the case<br />

of Cedar County, Nebraska. In that case the Department of Agriculture<br />

printed 250 copies for each U.S. Senator, 1000 for the Congressman, 75<br />

for the University,<br />

3000 for the USDA and 1000 for Cedar County.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are about 11,700 residents of Cedar County. ‘That means there<br />

is a supply of one copy for every two people in the county,n <strong>Exon</strong><br />

said.<br />

“Members of Congress are notified that these soil reports are<br />

available for them to distribute. I must assume it is supposedly a<br />

public relations tool. It is an expense that taxpayers would not<br />

apprc)ve. Members of Congress only need a few copies for reference and<br />

to handle any requests,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“I could pick 250 names out of the telephone book and mail out<br />

the reports, but why waste the taxpayers money,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “I cannot<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXON<br />

SOIL SURVEY REPORTS<br />

see how a member of the Senate or House could find a demand for 1000<br />

cop ies. <strong>The</strong> government time and expense of printing these excessive<br />

reports would be ‘better spent on the farm programs.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nebraska<br />

Senator said under the law the Secretary of<br />

Agriculture decides how many copies of the reports are printed. <strong>Exon</strong><br />

has written to the Secretary of Agriculture Richard Lyng urging him to<br />

reduce<br />

the number of copies as one of his first official acts.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> money saved from pri’nting these unnecessary extras will add<br />

up when you consider it is being done for nearly every county in the<br />

nation,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>The</strong>re are as many as 900 reports left to be<br />

completed nationwide. <strong>The</strong> savings could reduce the printing total by<br />

as much as 1,350,000 copies.<br />

In his letter, <strong>Exon</strong> compared the overprinting of soil reports to●<br />

the $400 hammers purchased by the Pentagon. He also urged Lyng to<br />

reduce the number which USDA prints<br />

for itself saying ‘I suspect that<br />

many of these copies simply gather dust on a shelf.n<br />

--30--<br />

COMMllTEEONTHE EUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC 2(J51O<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS


3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release, Thursday, March 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON STRENGTHENS BALANCED BUDGET CONSITITUTIONAL AMENDMENT<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Late Wednesday night, U.S. SENATOR JIM<br />

EXON (D-NEB) engineered the U.S. Senate’s unanimous approval of<br />

an amendment to the Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment<br />

which would require the President to submit a balanced budget to<br />

Congress.<br />

m<br />

“I’m a cosponsor of the Balanced Budget Constitutional<br />

Amendment; however, the Senate Judiciary Committee dropped all<br />

reference to the President and the Executive Branch from the<br />

original billr~ <strong>Exon</strong> said. “By deleting all references to the<br />

president, the Judiciary Committee significantly weakened this<br />

mu(ch needed Constitutional mandate,~ he added.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposal, offered by Senators <strong>Exon</strong> and Howard Metzenbaum<br />

(D-OH), requires the President to submit an annual balanced<br />

federal budget to Congress or provide an alternate budget with a<br />

written explanation stating why the budget should not be<br />

balanced.<br />

“As a former Governor. who prepared balanced budgets for our<br />

state, I know it is important that the Chief Executive submit a<br />

o<br />

‘balanced budget to the legislative branch to demonstrate fiscally<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXON<br />

AMENDME:iT TO BALANCED BUDGET CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT<br />

responsible leadership and to outline the Administration’s<br />

spending priorities,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. ‘Congress will always hold the<br />

purse strings of the federal government. This change will make<br />

future Presidents more accountable by requiring them to fully<br />

participate in making the difficult choices necessary to balance<br />

a budget,n he added,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Gramrn-Rudman law contains a similar provision requiring<br />

the President to submit annual federal budgets which do not<br />

exceed mandated budget deficit<br />

levels.<br />

-- 30 --<br />

COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC 2G51O<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS


3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release, Thursday, March 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—<br />

EXI~NMOVES TO pROTECT AG BUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- “<strong>The</strong> good news for the future of<br />

agriculture<br />

programs<br />

today is that I have been successful,<br />

thus<br />

far, in getting<br />

near<br />

unanimous agreement in the Senate Budget<br />

Committee to make no<br />

further cuts in agriculture programs,<br />

including agriculture extension services, for the next year of<br />

the budget,” <strong>Exon</strong> said Thursday in his weekly conference call<br />

with Nebraska broadcasters.<br />

‘Even Budget Committeeman Chairman Pete Domenici’s (R-NM)<br />

formal presentation to the Budget Committee today is in line with<br />

my suggestions of a freeze. This essentially accomplishes my<br />

long held view that we reduce the annual budget deficit by first<br />

stopping increases in the budget,” <strong>Exon</strong> said, who is a member of<br />

the Senate Budget Committee.<br />

‘Our bipartisan group in the Senate committee has been<br />

working and we have been very successful in coming up with a<br />

budget proposal that I believe will be realistic; it will be<br />

tough, but it will be one that I think will be accepted next week<br />

by the Budget Committee,n<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

--30--


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J eE<br />

na<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Re!lease, Thursday, March 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />

$1.7 MILLION GRANT TO EPPLY AIRPORT<br />

llASHINGTON, D .C . -- U .S . SENATOR JIM EXON announced today<br />

that t:heDepartment<br />

of Transportat ion has approved his request<br />

for arladditional $1.7 mil 1ion grant for Epply Airfield in Omaha.<br />

<strong>The</strong> funds will be used to continue the upgrading and<br />

●<br />

previclusly<br />

real i$~nmentof the drainage system of the airfield. Epply had<br />

been awarded $4 mil 1ion to begin the project.<br />

“It was crucial that the grant was approved by Thursday to<br />

allow Epply Airfield<br />

to accept a very favorable bid to continue<br />

the wclrk,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

E)artsof the extensive drainage system must be relocated due<br />

to the’expansion of the airport terminal. <strong>The</strong> work will take<br />

approximately two years to complete at a total cost of about $10<br />

millicn.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong>, who is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Aviation<br />

Subcommittee, has been working closely with the U.S.<br />

Transportation Department to finalize the grant.<br />

-


Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

}<br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

HUD<br />

Release, Friday, March 14, <strong>1986</strong><br />

HOMESTEAD GRANT TO OMAHA<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON Z<br />

a t H D<br />

D a O $<br />

H<br />

g p a i<br />

p e t<br />

h a N O<br />

U H a n p<br />

r<br />

e i d<br />

u a p o o<br />

p<br />

r o p<br />

t<br />

h a m a q<br />

h b p h<br />

r h s p<br />

e<br />

-


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

~ JS J Ee an<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Release, Thursday, March 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON WAS KEy VOTE IN APpROVING BUDGET IN COMMITTEE<br />

.<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S key vote in<br />

the Senate Budget Committee Wednesday afternoon sent the<br />

bipartisan budget compromise to the Senate floor.<br />

E~xonsaid tough cuts had to be made to get the budget<br />

deficit reduced and they “were accomplished by a unique<br />

bipartisan action.n<br />

o<br />

Twelve votes are required for approval by the 22 member<br />

committee. <strong>Exon</strong> was the twelfth vote recorded which assured<br />

appro~ral of the budget by the committee. <strong>The</strong> measure carried 13<br />

to 9.<br />

~!heNebraska Democrat had been active in a series of behind<br />

the scenes meetings over the past several weeks that led to the<br />

approved compromise.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said agricultural programs in general faired very well<br />

with no significant reductions in the budget document. <strong>Exon</strong> was<br />

instrumental in preventing cuts in the Rural Electrification<br />

Administration, Rural Telephone Bank, agricultural research and<br />

extension services. Federal aid for school districts impacted by<br />

milit:~ry and indian reservations was protected as was basic<br />

health and educational programs.<br />

have been encouraging a budget freeze approach to federal<br />

spending for years. It finally came to pass,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> measure meets the goal of reducing the budget deficit to<br />

$144 billion in the next fiscal year. <strong>The</strong> committee approved a<br />

combination of $20.2 billion in spending reductions and $12.6<br />

billion in revenues above those recommended by President Reagan.<br />

“This is a budget<br />

that should fly,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

o --30--


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

S J e J E] al<br />

.<br />

N’ewsRelease<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Relez~se, Thursday, March 27, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON SUP1?ORTSBANK LAW CHANGES FOR RURAL BANKS<br />

WASHINGTON, D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is c<br />

i 2 e p r f<br />

b ] c p .<br />

i w a o<br />

r i 1 r fi y<br />

p n b e p f<br />

● )<br />

f v c r a<br />

d f p<br />

d<br />

a fi t a p<br />

p r a ” i 1<br />

not so1vt:al1 the problems facing rura1 1enders and<br />

beg in.to ease some of the pressure in agriculture, ”<br />

borrowers, but it will<br />

he added.<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislation would allow agricultural banks<br />

to restructure<br />

debts<br />

by either reducing interest rates, extension of the<br />

maturity<br />

date,<br />

forgiven~:ss of debt, transfer of property or a comb: nation of these<br />

optiofns. It would also permit rural lenders to not<br />

automatically<br />

classify<br />

renegoti?~ted loans as “nonperforming” or troubled loans.<br />

“Congress needs to initiate positive<br />

action like this to try to stall<br />

the incr{:asingnumber of bank failures and subsequent foreclosures on<br />

o farms, rt~nchesand rural businesses,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

-


U ! $ . e n aS<br />

t o<br />

●<br />

E Z<br />

N e b r<br />

SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />

Contact:Art Jaeger<br />

Wash:ingtcn, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />

FOR I-’IATE RELEASE:~~rch 28, <strong>1986</strong><br />

ZORINSKY,EXON ~IL APPROVALOF $47.5YILLIONFOR ~~<br />

AQUIFER<br />

!tashington, D.C............Senators~ward Zorinsky(D.-*b. ) ati J. James<strong>Exon</strong> (D.-<br />

Neb.:1hailedSenatepassage%rch 26 of legislationauthorizing$47.5millionover five<br />

y<br />

to reducedepletionof the OgallalaAquifer.<br />

l!massiveundergroundreservoir,the OgallalaAquiferis a key sourceof irrigation<br />

wate]:for Nebraskaad fiveotherHigh Plainsstates. Two yearsago, Congressauthorized<br />

●1 up to 21 f~eral demonstrationprojectsto test varioustechniquesfor artificially<br />

replenishi~such undergroundwater su~lies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rrostrecentSenatelegislationauthorizes$27.5 millionfor researchgrantsto<br />

educationalinstitutionsati stategovertnnentsin the High plainsregion,Z<br />

m<br />

s S a o t w p m w<br />

a r i t e<br />

o<br />

millionmore wouldbe allocatedto qualifyingfarmersfor buildi~ projects<br />

thatdemonstratenew technologiesfor such thingsas water-efficientirrigation,soil and<br />

watel:conservationmanag~t<br />

and the growingand marketingof water-efficientcrops.<br />

<strong>The</strong> senatorssaid the researchand demonstrationprojectsare crucialto reversingthe<br />

gradualdepletionof the OgallalaAquifer,which su~rts<br />

more than 170,000irrigation<br />

wells in Nebraska,Colorado,Kansas,New %xico, Oklahomaand Texas.<br />

Estimatesare the aquiferis beingoverdrawnby more than 3 millionacre-feetof water<br />

o<br />

annu~~lly,they said.


2<br />

Authorizationfor the five-yearresearchand demonstrationprojecteffortwas includ<br />

in the firstgeneralwaterprojects p S y<br />

authorizd in the $11.1billionbill, the senatorssaid, is $50.5millionto<br />

restoreati preserveaquaticareasalongthe MissouriRiver in Nebraska,Iowa,Kansasand<br />

‘~issouri.<br />

- for the proj=t stemsfrombank stabilizationand navigationconstructionkiq<br />

done alongthe river,Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Houseversionof the waterprojectsbill,passedlast fall,does not includethe<br />

aquiferproject.<br />

Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> expressedthe hope that the Nebraskaprovisionsof both billswill<br />

be retainedin the House-Senateconference.<br />

9<br />

— 30 --<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C, 20510<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

~is~nlator J E<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

I Fcr R(>lease,Wednesday, Apr i1 2,.<strong>1986</strong><br />

——.——. EXON 1~RAISES ELIMINATING DUTY FREE STATUS TO ETHANOL IMPORTS<br />

I.INCOLN, NEBR . -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D -NEB) Wednesday<br />

pra is(>dPresident Reagan s decision to follow the adv ice of Congress<br />

and e~.iminate the duty free pr ivi1eges for Bra zi1ian ethano 1.<br />

<strong>The</strong> duty<br />

free status al1owed Brazi1ian ethanol<br />

to unfairly compete with domestic<br />

●<br />

I<br />

gasohc)l.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> importers of Brazilian ethanol have been abusing the law at<br />

the expense of American farmers,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Stopping the flood of<br />

ethanc)l imports will preserve an important market for American farmers<br />

and acidto our nation’s energy<br />

independence, ” he added.<br />

E’ormonths <strong>Exon</strong> has been urging the Administration to eliminate<br />

the duty free treatment received by Brazilian ethanol mixtures. In a<br />

February 3rd letter to the Clayton Yeutter, U.S. Trade Representative,<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> zlndeight other senators urged the “immediate removal” of imported<br />

ethanc)lmixtures from the eligibility list for duty free treatment<br />

under the Generalized System of Preferences. Last January 15th the<br />

U*S. (;ustoms Service ruled that certain imported ethanol mixtures could<br />

be imported duty free.<br />

“It was ridiculous<br />

that the U.S. Customs Service ever permitted<br />

a ) imported ethanol mixtures to enter the United States duty free when the<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXOfl<br />

DUTY FREE ETHANOL<br />

IMPORTS STOPPED<br />

nation is trying to develop its own ethanol industry,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. e “<strong>The</strong><br />

nation was working against itself by allowing imported ethanol in duty<br />

free. I am pleased this unfair practice will be stopped,n he added.<br />

In February<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> noted that if the imported ethanol were allowed<br />

in duty free for only four months, up to 200 million gallons of<br />

Brazilian ethanol mixtures would flood the U.S. ethanol market.<br />

“Such a flood of imported ethanol would have severely damaged<br />

our<br />

nation’s domestic ethanol industry and further harmed the already<br />

ailing farm economy,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Last February <strong>Exon</strong> also cosponsored the introduction of<br />

legislation<br />

which would close the legal loopholes that have allowed<br />

ethanol importers to avoid U.S. tariff laws. <strong>The</strong> legislation would<br />

make all imported ethanol subject to the Congressionally mandated<br />

60-cent per gallon<br />

tariff and close other loopholes.<br />

--30--<br />

.<br />

&<br />

COMMl~EE ONWE BUDGET<br />

.’<br />

WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />

~, OFFICU BUSINESS


3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

R W - A<br />

EXON [cZORINSKY TO REQUEST AG COMMITTEE HEARING IN NEBRASKA<br />

LINCOLN, NEBR. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

W r a f h S<br />

A C N a i<br />

on the s r p<br />

Z;orinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> acted in response to a resolution passed<br />

by the N L W c such a hearing.<br />

* ‘It is important that Nebraskans have an opportunity to<br />

learn as much as possible about the Farm Bill as well a w to<br />

inCreZ~Seagricultural exports,m Nebraskats two U.S. Senators<br />

said. “Even more important will be the opportunity for us to<br />

receive input from Nebraska farmers and ranchers on how best to<br />

proceed<br />

and what future actions should be taken to help restore<br />

the health of Nebraska agriculture and main street businesses<br />

which depend<br />

on it.n<br />

-<br />

.


330 Hart Office Bui<br />

Washington,D.C. 2051~ m<br />

r<strong>News</strong><br />

k<br />

! Contact: MarkBowen<br />

R W A<br />

E & Z S D B R<br />

W S Z<br />

W c a b r c<br />

S A i c<br />

m a g p<br />

a f d c i<br />

e l n c<br />

d c b S A<br />

n a c u m p<br />

d i e<br />

B a M<br />

e a d b p<br />

d s m d e<br />

r<br />

p i Z<br />

m<br />

E Z s<br />

N S A<br />

N L F A<br />

r c S A<br />

i p d 1 A 31<br />

@ dairy herd disposal period. <strong>The</strong> resolution urges that red meat<br />

e


I<br />

@ ) D B<br />

p s c n c<br />

s d d p<br />

r s s o<br />

f d i c<br />

d r i a<br />

e p s c s<br />

w d p<br />

-


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J eE<br />

an<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T S 2<br />

For Re:l. ease, Thursday, April 10, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATE PASSES MEASURE TO HELP CATTLE INDUSTRY<br />

W,4SHINGTON, D .C . -- <strong>The</strong> Senate overwhelm ingly approved a<br />

measure offered by U.S. Senators Jim <strong>Exon</strong> (D-NEB), Ed Zorinsky<br />

(D-NEB~Iand Max Baucus (D-MT) taking a positive step toward<br />

correc ting the cattle market cr isis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> measure, a Senate resolution, calls on the Agriculture<br />

Department (USDA) to correct the damage to the markets caused by<br />

the dairy herd slaughter. <strong>The</strong> Senate approved the measure by a<br />

vote o f 86 to 12. It is attached to a bill proposing the sale of<br />

two Wa:~hington, D.C. area airports.<br />

●<br />

immedi,~techanges<br />

Tilemeasure calls on the Secretary of Agriculture to make<br />

in the USDA S buyout program of dairy herds.<br />

It urges the USDA to increase the red meat purchases and<br />

reschedule the slaughter of dairy herds to stabilize the beef<br />

markets, according to <strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky. It recommends the USDA<br />

implement a plan to encourage proportional spacing of dairy<br />

cat:tle slaughtering within each disposal period.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senators said it is essential that the USDA act<br />

q c d c i<br />

m<br />

of the d s<br />

i<br />

USDA’S mismanagement has devastated the cattle market,w<br />

Zorinsl{yand <strong>Exon</strong> said. ‘This measure sends a loud message to<br />

the De]?artment to correct the problems and prevent further damage<br />

to the cattle industry.”<br />

Tilemeasure includes <strong>Exon</strong>’s request that the Agriculture<br />

Secretary report back to the Congress by April 15th on what<br />

corrective action has been taken.<br />

--30--


SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />

. SJ J eE<br />

na<br />

<strong>News</strong>Release<br />

3 H O B<br />

M C M U B F<br />

W D 2 A T 2S<br />

For Re Lease, April 10, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON CITES TRAFFIC FIGURES<br />

W,~SHINGTON, D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />

encour aged by the Nebraska legislature s vote to raise the interstate<br />

spczed 1imit to 70 mph, provided his proposed national leg islation<br />

becomes<br />

law.<br />

●’<br />

E~on said he has<br />

suggest ion. With the<br />

enI.ist in the effort,<br />

proposal,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

been encouraged by the response to his<br />

help of President Reagan, whom <strong>Exon</strong> hopes to<br />

“we may be successful in exped iting this<br />

As a canalidate for President in 1980, Reagan<br />

campaigned for increasing the speed 1imit.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> s suggestions would affeet only the nation s interstate<br />

system speed 1imits, leaving the maximum<br />

speed 1imit at 55 mph on<br />

other roads. It would maintain local control of speeds by providing<br />

state and local governments I where i ~ a i<br />

existing speed limits in effect if they desire. This is permissive<br />

legislation only to raise interstate speeds up to 70 mph.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said criticism from “so-called safety experts or bureaucrats<br />

who make a living spewing out statistics were misleading at best. ”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said those employing “irresponsible scare tactics” are<br />

attacking his proposed bill by citing misleading<br />

traffic death<br />

a<br />

statistics.<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXON<br />

TRAFFIC SAFETY FIGURES<br />

‘<strong>The</strong>re have been published reports that deaths on Nebraska roads<br />

have decreased since the 55 mph speed limit went into effect,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />

said. “That’s true, but they don’t seem to recognize the obvious fact<br />

their statistics prove that over 90% of the traffic deaths do not<br />

occur on interstatesr” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong>se bureaucrats decry raising<br />

the interstate speed to mph, claiming 55 mph is the interstate<br />

speed,~ <strong>Exon</strong> commented<br />

“while ignoring the fact that no traffic has<br />

moved at 55 mph on Nebraskans interstate for a decade.v<br />

‘Those desk bound bureaucrats should venture out into the real<br />

world they would know that Nebraska{s interstate traffic moves at<br />

near 65 mph now and has for years”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> official Nebraska Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents report<br />

shows there were traffic deaths of which only eleven or<br />

percent were on the interstate.<br />

speed as a factor contributing<br />

Of those eleven not one case cited<br />

to the accidents.<br />

Nationwide in 1 according to the most recent national figures<br />

available, there were 44,257 highway deaths, of which 4,300 were on<br />

the interstates. This proves the old axiom that ‘figures donlt lie<br />

but sometimes<br />

liars figure.”<br />

-


U S e . n a S t o<br />

●<br />

E Z<br />

N e b r<br />

SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuildinq<br />

~NaShi.l~torl, D.C.20510<br />

Contact:Art Jaeaer<br />

2<br />

FOR I’T4EDI’ATE RELEASE: April 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EFF~TS OF DAIRY SLATJGTER‘D~?ASTATING,1 ZORI’{SKYAm<br />

EXON cmR~<br />

‘~{~shirgton, D.C............<strong>The</strong>effectsof the AgricultureDepartment’sdairy herd<br />

slaughterprogramhave been “devastating”so far, Senators~ward Zorinskyad<br />

J. James<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> }~avecharged.<br />

‘Nithan influxof beef severelydepressingMidwesterncattlemarkets,the two Nebraska<br />

●senatorsasked in a letterwhy the adversereactionwasn’tforeseenby TJSDA.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y also questionedif governmentpurchaseof 400 millionpouds of red meat will be<br />

sufficientto solvethe problem.<br />

A federaljudgehas temporarilyblockd the slaughterprogrambecauseof cunplaints<br />

fran the Vmane Society. ‘Ultimately, however,the programcould see 1.5millioncattle<br />

killedto reducethe dairy surplus.<br />

IrltheirApril9 letterto AgricultureSecretaryRichardLyng, Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong><br />

link&lthe USDA slaughterprogramto a “precipitousdeclinenin livestockprices.<br />

“filile concedingthat the pricedropmay be an overreaction,the senatorssaid,‘a<br />

negativereactionshouldhave been foreseen,particularlywhen orderlymarketingpractices<br />

are not followed.”<br />

Disposalof government-purchased red meat, Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said,may onlydisplace<br />

cmercial sales. “T*must...questionwhetherthe purchase...willhave its intended<br />

●Iresultof totallyoffsettingthe dairybuyout,nthey said.


2<br />

At the same time,Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said, IIthecontinuedinfluxof Canadianand other<br />

foreignmeat furthercontributesto downwardpricepressureat a timewhen our dmestic<br />

producersare being eliminatedon a wholesalebasis.n<br />

<strong>The</strong> two senatorsalso questiond why tax-exemptfinanciq is helpi~ an Irishcompany<br />

establisha “eorgiadairy operationwhile‘1.S.producersare beingeliminated.<br />

Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> urgedLyng to ‘establisha dairyherd buyouta<br />

red meat purchase<br />

and disposalschedulethatwill minimize,if not eliminate,the devastatingeffectsof the<br />

(slaughter)program’simplantation thus far.w<br />

WASHINGToNs D.C. 20510<br />

OFFICIALEUSINESS


W<br />

H O B<br />

D 2<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

a<br />

For Release, Tuesday, April 15, <strong>1986</strong><br />

——.—— EXON C:OMMENT ABOUT ATTACK ON LIBYA<br />

Washington, D.C. -- “Unfortunately our strike<br />

force at<br />

Libya hit unintended targets, such as the French Embassy and the<br />

residence of the Japanese Ambassador. <strong>The</strong>se things happen during<br />

war. <strong>The</strong> early reports indicate a rather limited loss of life.<br />

This is good. In my view the President was left with no option<br />

but tcjlaunch the strike force. Given the failure of most of our<br />

allies to discharge their joint responsibilities, we had to go it<br />

alone. I suggest that things are going to get worse before they<br />

get b~ltter, but ignoring a cancer won’t cure it. We took a<br />

calculated risk. We did something and can only hope and pray it<br />

will lead to an eventual partial solution to the terror that is<br />

Khadafy of Libya,” U.S. Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong> Tuesday morning.<br />

-


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

,&<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

a<br />

R W A<br />

— A D N S P<br />

W , D.C . s m S<br />

S C a a D<br />

g n s p S<br />

( ( s c<br />

c r p<br />

S D L R (<br />

a<br />

g r m<br />

r<br />

n s i f S e<br />

p S g f d<br />

c i f p m ” a<br />

O m g i S<br />

( , C ( , ( , ( ,<br />

H H ( B J (<br />

( , C ( , R ( ,<br />

R (<br />

Nunn is the r D a s m<br />

thtaSenate Armed S C<br />

-<br />

p


m J . . ——<br />

Contact:<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Re’lease,Thursday. April 17, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXC)NDISAPPOINTED AT REACTION OF ALLIES TO BOMBING LIBYA<br />

——. ——<br />

W;$SHINGTON, D.C. -- ‘<strong>The</strong> President had no option but to<br />

order the strikes against Libya both to retaliate for Khadhafy’s<br />

earlier terrorist activity as well as to discourage future<br />

a p a From the briefings I have r<br />

J C S c<br />

● civilian<br />

to prevent civilian casualties and unnecessary destruction. <strong>The</strong><br />

losses are unfortunate, but this is the risk of<br />

bombing. Nevertheless, our response was appropriate and the<br />

bombinf; runs were carried out in a responsible and professional<br />

manner,” <strong>Exon</strong> said during his weekly conference call with<br />

Nebrasl


I<br />

For R~>lease,Friday, April 18, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON PROPOSES GIVING STATES AUTHORITY TO SET INTERSTATE SPEED<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

\rASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. sENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has<br />

introduced legislation to give states the option to set the speed<br />

limit on interstate highways to a maximum of 70 miles per hour.<br />

I<br />

“In Nebraska the speed limit on interstates may be posted at<br />

55 mph, but it is obvious from traveling the interstate that the<br />

actua:l.authorized speed limit is 65 mph and that is the speed at<br />

which t m <strong>Exon</strong> said. a<br />

i<br />

a<br />

N<br />

a<br />

l w s o s<br />

s l i h a m 70 mph<br />

without losing federal highway funds. No two lane federal<br />

highway, state highway, county or local road speed limits would<br />

be affected whera the federal limit would remain 55 mph.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> states operate these interstates and should have the<br />

acltho:cityto set the speed limits within reason~” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“This legislation would give state government’s the power to<br />

set the speed limits on the interstates within their borders,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said. “If a state would like to retain the 55 mph limit on<br />

interstate or a part of them? such as in urban areas, they would<br />

have the right to do so,” he added.<br />

‘<strong>Exon</strong>also has written to President Reagan seeking his<br />

support of the legislation. Reagan, campaigning for the<br />

Presidency in 1980, opposed the 55 mph speed limit. <strong>Exon</strong> said he<br />

would consider any amendments President Reagan has which would<br />

allow him to support the bill.<br />

‘Statistics show that the vast majority of traffic<br />

fatalities occur on state and county roads, not on interstates~”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said. In Nebraska, of the 237 traffic deaths in 1985, less<br />

than five percent occurred on interstates. Nebraska reports show<br />

that of the 11 interstate fatalities not a single case listed<br />

f!exceeding the speed limit” ‘r ‘speed too fast for conditions” as<br />

factors contributing to the fatal accidents.<br />

-


I<br />

U I S . e ; n a S t o<br />

o I E Z<br />

N e b r<br />

,Suite SR-.443,Russel1 SenateOfficeBuilding<br />

Contact:Art Jaqer<br />

Washingtcln, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />

FOR I*~lIATE RELEASE:April 19, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SE~TElPASSESRESOLUTIONON ErJROPEAFJ I’~RT RESTRICTIONSBACK~ BY ZORINSKYAm<br />

EXON<br />

!Yashi ngton, D.C............<strong>The</strong>Senatehas a~roved legislationcosponsoredby Nebraska<br />

seIlatOYSrewardZ<br />

J. James<strong>Exon</strong> opposingimportrestrictionson up to $1<br />

billionin TJ.S. farmproductsgoing to Spainand Portugal.<br />

<strong>The</strong> restrictionsresultfrom the admittanceof Spainam<br />

Portugalinto the Euro-an<br />

Cmunity’ January1. <strong>The</strong>y includetariffsboostingthe cost of TJ.S. grain to Spainand<br />

●<br />

) quotasreducingthe amountof grain and oilseedsthat Portugalcan im~rt.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ElnitdStatescontetisthe quotasviolatethe c~neralAgrment on Tariffsand<br />

T m t a b n<br />

In additionto puttingthe Senateon recordas opposingthe restrictions,the<br />

resolutic~n sponsoredjointlyby Zorinsky,<strong>Exon</strong> and other farm statesenatorsbacks<br />

retaliatc)ry moves announcedby the ReaganAdministration.<br />

<strong>The</strong> retaliatorymoves establishquotasand tariffson EC productsenteringthis<br />

countrytlnlessthe Europeansrepealtheirrestrictions.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> EuropeanCmunity’s<br />

agriculturalpolicyhas seriouslyhurt TJ.S.farm exportsat<br />

a<br />

when we can leastaffordit,~said Zorinsky,rankingDemocraton the Agriculture<br />

‘Our farmersshouldnot have to pay the price for the EuropeanCmunity’s<br />

enla:rgaent~”added<strong>Exon</strong>.<br />

●) <strong>The</strong> resolutionpassedon a voicevote April 17.


uo~o E i e n a t o<br />

E<br />

Z<br />

N e b r<br />

SuiteSR-{,43,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />

Contact:Art Ja~er<br />

‘Nashi]gtorlr D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />

FOR 1-1 ATE RELEASE:April 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />

ZORINSKY/EXONTJRqECYANt~ESIN PAYYEW LIMITATIONWLICY<br />

‘Nashirgton, D.C............TJSDArqulations implementingthe $50,000annual1imit.or!<br />

crop subsidiesand farmprogrambenefitsare hurtingbeginningfarmers,Senators~war{l<br />

Zorinsky{D.-Mb.) and J. James<strong>Exon</strong> (D.-Neb.) have charged.<br />

In an April21 letterto AgricultureSecretaryRichardE. Lyng, Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong><br />

notedthat:the rJSDAregulationstreatfarmerswho shareequi~ent ati are cosignerson<br />

loansas :1singleoperation.<br />

But tightcreditand the poor agriculturaleconanyoften forceyoung farmersto share<br />

equi~ent with familymembersalso in agriculture,the senatorssaid. Likewise,family<br />

m~ers<br />

establishedin farmingoftencosignloansfor thosejust startingout, they said.<br />

As a result,Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said,a young farmerprudentlyseekingto minimize<br />

creditdemandsati equi~ent purchasesruns IIheadlongintoTJSDAguidelinesthat<br />

unnecessax:ily penalize”him and his family.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two NebraskansaskedLyw<br />

to reconsiderthe paymentlimitp<br />

enhance,r“atherthandeter,the continuationof our l<br />

w<br />

systemof familyfarming.”


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington,D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

. I Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

~<br />

R T A<br />

—..—— EXON SUPPORTS PROHIBITING THE IRS FROM REQUIRING MILEAGE LOGBOOKS<br />

IVASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is<br />

cosponsoring legislation (S.2136) to prevent the Internal Revenue<br />

Service (IRS) from requiring taxpayers to keep detailed mileage<br />

logbooks for business vehicles.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> Congress thought it had corrected this problem last year by<br />

pzohil)iting the IRS from requiring mileage logs for business vehicles.<br />

Unfortunatelyr the IRS in rewriting the regulations has created<br />

confusion by saying that a logbook is not required, but implying that a<br />

logboc)k is the only way to qualify for the deduction,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

~!helegislation would require the IRS to reinstate the mileage<br />

r k r used prior 1984 change. Prior to<br />

1984 contemporaneous log keeping was not required.<br />

‘Taxpayers were led to believe they did not need to keep a<br />

Iogboclk,but many are now worried that without the logbook they don’t<br />

qualify for the deduction,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>The</strong> legislation is currently<br />

pendir~g before<br />

the Senate Finance Committee.<br />

“As a former owner of my own business,<br />

I know the importance of<br />

this provision and will continue to work to end unnecessary regulations<br />

by the IRS and other federal agencies,W <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

-


Jim<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

Hart Office Building<br />

I 1<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

.1 Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:2<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

For Release, Thursday, April 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON SUPPORTS EXTENDING TAX AMENDMENT PERIOD FOR INSOLVENT FARMERS<br />

klASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is<br />

cosponsoring legislation (S.2350) to extend the time for insolvent<br />

farmers to file amended returns to take advantage of a recent tax law<br />

change.<br />

On April 7th, the President signed into law a provision which<br />

provitles that insolvent farmers who sell or transfer farmland to<br />

satisf’y a debt or to avoid foreclosure<br />

do not have to count any<br />

●<br />

minimcim<br />

capitzll gains realized from that transaction for calculating the<br />

tax.<br />

‘Even though this change allows farmers to amend their tax<br />

returr[sdating back to 1982, current law mandated that farmers file<br />

an amended 1982 return by April 15th of this year. Farmers were thus<br />

given only eight days to amend a 1982 return,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. This<br />

legislation will give insolvent farmers an additional six months from<br />

the date of enactment into law to amend returns dating back to 1982.<br />

U.S. Senator Ed Zorinsky (D-NEB) is also a cosponsor of the bill.<br />

Elxonhas contacted the members of the Senate Finance Committee<br />

and urged them<br />

In a letter to<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said ‘<strong>The</strong><br />

to move quickly to approve the six-month extension.<br />

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Bob Packwood (R-OR),<br />

Congress clearly intended the protections of this new<br />

● gettir,g<br />

be available for transactions made in 1982, but the delay in<br />

this legislation enacted gave many farmers and their<br />

accourltants too little time to act.”<br />

--30--


+.<br />

H<br />

R<br />

S<br />

A<br />

W 2<br />

S L<br />

●<br />

*<br />

Your letter of March 28, <strong>1986</strong> was devoid of a soluti,on to the<br />

problem. My concern over excessive printing of soil surveys<br />

appeared to be dismissed with a “let’s divert attention from the<br />

waste” issue. I am once again asking that you consider my<br />

concern and address the question on a forthright basis. Radical<br />

change is obviously necessary to stop this waste and abuse. Your<br />

trite responses to my suggestions and your bureaucratic feeding<br />

the press of copies of our letters “ordering” copies are a clever<br />

divergence, but ignore the problem.<br />

d a S<br />

A a c r<br />

d f w i l q<br />

n u s<br />

p r I C N<br />

e r r<br />

a s C c N<br />

N o h a<br />

D A e L I<br />

a c o u<br />

C S o A a t l<br />

e<br />

e s r o<br />

f l a f c p<br />

a o “ a ”<br />

D p u<br />

c e C C a<br />

I d m h S<br />

C o t “ q a a<br />

1 c c c<br />

Cc,ngressional purposes are borne by the U.S. Printing Office<br />

rather than the Department of Agriculture. As it ‘turns out, the<br />

pcllicy seems to be to print all we can whether needed or not and<br />

obtain Congressional “orders” for the maximum since the costs are<br />

ncltpaid by the Department of Agriculture. Our Lincoln office<br />

fell into this “trap” and for that we plead “guilty.”


. .<br />

t’ ,<br />

●<br />

H<br />

A<br />

2<br />

R<br />

I<br />

●’<br />

i p 5 c a s a<br />

c a p 1 p<br />

a 1 f i<br />

d a l<br />

d<br />

p<br />

A c N R D<br />

N I f n o a s<br />

d p i C<br />

d f t a o<br />

o t c<br />

s s d<br />

b t I<br />

e A s W I<br />

f c D A<br />

t s W l t<br />

p l l<br />

c s a q<br />

a p c E<br />

t s W<br />

t<br />

o c H M N<br />

N R D T N<br />

t b b s<br />

w r a a s s i<br />

h i r<br />

s p c N<br />

C s m B r<br />

a 1 s<br />

I<br />

a<br />

C P o n s<br />

C<br />

h<br />

a c r p f<br />

e c C C a<br />

m C w s<br />

p w s e a a<br />

u d n


I<br />

* H R<br />

A<br />

3<br />

My t e<br />

D b d a r n<br />

c n a g c a c i<br />

d e e w<br />

I d o “ surveys to<br />

w I “ “ s i b<br />

d c u t<br />

s<br />

S<br />

U<br />

S<br />

S<br />

E<br />

H D<br />

C S B C<br />

H<br />

L C<br />

R M M S B C<br />

H J H<br />

C S C A N<br />

F<br />

H E Z<br />

R M M S C A<br />

N<br />

F<br />

H<br />

H<br />

C S C A<br />

H<br />

S<br />

R M M S C A


1- . ,<br />

.<br />

M<br />

R<br />

S<br />

U D A<br />

W D .<br />

L<br />

I r i P O p<br />

250 c c s r d<br />

o I n r p r<br />

w d c a<br />

i C C N r<br />

P O p c c<br />

s r S s<br />

C D U<br />

D A c<br />

o C C a<br />

5 a c w a p 1<br />

a<br />

P c t r h<br />

u r a r<br />

p a r e p c<br />

U T C 1 secretary<br />

A a d n c<br />

p o f p<br />

r w b s p<br />

w c $400 h P<br />

p I t y a f g<br />

f c e h<br />

b d N a s<br />

s c 1<br />

c c r p s<br />

N C d s p<br />

n w s<br />

your first acts as Secretary of Agriculture I urge<br />

you to eliminate the wasteful overprinting of these reports by<br />

reducing the number printed for Members of Congress and the<br />

U I s t c s g a<br />

s o M C r a<br />

c r p h r<br />

w<br />

a t I w a i a<br />

e<br />

Sincerely,<br />

J. James <strong>Exon</strong><br />

United States Senator


●)<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R<br />

E C A S<br />

W<br />

B<br />

S<br />

P<br />

(D-NEB) T<br />

u p a S f b<br />

a e p p b<br />

b S o<br />

d p r<br />

d b b p S<br />

B<br />

C<br />

S<br />

A<br />

I


+<br />

●<br />

B<br />

S<br />

S<br />

P N F A S D<br />

C S Y A N<br />

D<br />

T<br />

1 F F C D<br />

I N D A R B<br />

S E D F G<br />

I E A W F F<br />

G E B F G<br />

L B M I P<br />

S<br />

C S T C<br />

A B A F A G B<br />

F R P E<br />

G B I A<br />

S A P A<br />

M<br />

A<br />

F C M A<br />

R L D E T<br />

S O A S Q<br />

G<br />

E D A M F<br />

F C T E F G L<br />

A L N F A S N<br />

A S E L S M<br />

R S B<br />

R C F D O<br />

M B I A<br />

K I R D<br />

A S W<br />

O E D C<br />

R<br />

B S S J I<br />

O A W W S<br />

I M C A<br />

R D I V<br />

= A C C<br />

A<br />

S Y S E H (<br />

A ( I P<br />

C<br />

P B B E<br />

B B S Y S A<br />

F R I C<br />

N TO EFFECTIVELY DEAL WITH THE DEFICIT.<br />

Y C AND THE PRESIDENT<br />

TRIED TO DUCK THE DEFICIT CRISIS AGAIN BY TURNING OVER THE<br />

LEGISLATIVE RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE DIFFICULT CHOICES TO AN<br />

ARBITRARY MATHEMATICAL FORMULA. AS MY COLLEAGUES WELL KNOW, I<br />

STRONGLY OPPOSED THE GRAMM-RUDm AMENDMENT TO THE PRESIDENT’S $2<br />

TRILLION DEBT CEILING INCREASE REQUEST. I FELT THAT THE<br />

B<br />

R<br />

E<br />

O


.<br />

.> .- on .n xnnr n . . . - A m.. . . . - . . . . . --- -_..--—- — - .---_— ~ -A ,-...-<br />

-WWVUYL-KUUIVH hrFKuALH wAb Nu’1’ A KESPUNS 1BLE ANSWER “l”u UUK<br />

N ‘S S E P<br />

W I O A U A S<br />

R G P I S<br />

G B W S L C ( ,<br />

H I S W D<br />

R T G G<br />

L I T P<br />

O<br />

F G A<br />

D R<br />

T A S M N A<br />

SOIJND FISCAL POLICY IS BEFORE THE SENATE. I AM PLEASED TO<br />

SU1~PORT THE DOMENICI-CHILES BI-PARTISAN BUDGET p~c I VOTED FOR<br />

THIS PROPOSAL IN THE SENATE BUDGET COMMITTEE AND PARTICIPATED IN<br />

N W p C<br />

B B A F A F SOUND PLAN<br />

TO BALANCE THE BUDGET BY 1 B B P<br />

F M D R T G<br />

P<br />

C R M M B<br />

C C W<br />

U D C C G<br />

F S Y S B C W<br />

A T B C M P A<br />

B W S R D<br />

W I S S S P<br />

W<br />

C<br />

B L D A B<br />

R T<br />

C C A<br />

G A S B B A<br />

F P R B C R<br />

C S B C I B<br />

R THE CONSENSUS OF THE CONGRESS AND THE PEOPLE.<br />

WE NO M A A B<br />

A C A P C<br />

B P S S<br />

A P E B B A<br />

“ B S R H<br />

S Y L C A<br />

S R P B D<br />

1 A W A C B R<br />

S T A L N<br />

C D N P F<br />

Y L T A I F FOR A MUCH NEEDED FARM<br />

C I E S A REPLACEMENT FOR THE<br />

C S S<br />

I


*<br />

*, ,*<br />

.<br />

0<br />

I E P R<br />

M S R F A<br />

R C B P<br />

R D R F S<br />

B P E R I<br />

I I R R<br />

R C C L I<br />

T C P I T I<br />

O F C<br />

W<br />

I<br />

P I B B<br />

D T G<br />

C P P N<br />

C<br />

B O E P<br />

I<br />

B W F I D<br />

B O W P B<br />

G D T B<br />

F C A A S<br />

C W A B R A<br />

S R P<br />

S<br />

P D R<br />

P D A L T<br />

F S F B A F G<br />

B E B A S P<br />

G F R I C S<br />

T B E C<br />

G A C S<br />

O


Released<br />

April 28, <strong>1986</strong><br />

<strong>Exon</strong> Thanked for Protecting Rural Programs<br />

U.S.Senator Jim<strong>Exon</strong>waspresented acakeinappreciation forhisuccessful<br />

efforts intheSenateBudgetCommittee toprotect federal funding<br />

fortheRuralElectric Administration andRuralTelephone Bank.<strong>The</strong>President’s<br />

budgethasproposed phasing outfederal funding fortheserural programs.Presenting<br />

thecaketo<strong>Exon</strong>areKimEpstein (left) andStuart Procter<br />

(right) oftheNational Telephone Cooperative Association.


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

a Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R 1~<br />

6 M A I I<br />

W , D .C . S i<br />

V A m i<br />

a M C I<br />

c i s i<br />

p p i u c<br />

a c s<br />

f a C<br />

-


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

.<strong>News</strong><br />

. [ Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

I<br />

FOICRelease, Tuesday, May 6, <strong>1986</strong><br />

.— EXON & ZORINSKY URGE ABANDONMENT OF PROPOSED SOIL SERVICE OFFICES MOVE<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. --- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

Tusday sent a letter from six U.S. Senators to Agriculture<br />

Secretary Richard Lyng requesting abandonment of the<br />

Administration’s efforts to close Soil Conservation Service<br />

OffiCeS in Nebraska, Pennsylvania and Oregon.<br />

●<br />

centralize<br />

T’heDepartment of Agriculture has announced plans to<br />

all such services in Fort Worth, Texas, supposedly for<br />

ecc)nomic reasons.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> letter,” <strong>Exon</strong> said, “was formulated<br />

to take a strong<br />

bipartisan approach in opposition to this ill-advised action by<br />

the De]?artment of Agriculture.H<br />

111addition to Democrats <strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky, the letter was<br />

signed by Republican Senators John Heinz and Arlen Specter of<br />

Pennsylvania and Bob Packwood and Mark Hatfield of Oregon.<br />

--30--


For Rc!lease, Thursday, May 8, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON E’RAISESPASSAGE OF DEFENSE REORGANIZATION BILL<br />

—.<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

VrASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) praised the<br />

passage of the legislation to reorganize the Defense Department. <strong>The</strong><br />

Senate passed the bill with an unusual<br />

95 to O vote.<br />

‘Senate approval marks the first major reorganization of the<br />

Department of Defense and the military services,n said <strong>Exon</strong>, who is a<br />

senio~’member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. <strong>Exon</strong> cosponsored<br />

the legislation and participated in drafting the reorganization.<br />

‘This is a good bill which passed over serious objections from the<br />

●’<br />

pentagon bureaucracy. It will make a number of much needed improvements<br />

in streamlining the operation of the Defense Department. <strong>The</strong><br />

organizational changes dictated for the Defense Department and<br />

individual military services refocuses attention on military strategy<br />

and reduces much of bureaucratic duplication in the Pentagon,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />

said. “This helps ensure that the billions of dollars spent on national<br />

security is not wasted through duplication or lack of cooperation<br />

between<br />

the services,” ,<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Modern warfare and more importantly the methods of deterring war<br />

have become more complex, <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Dollars alone do not’make a good<br />

national defense. Funding must be complimented with a responsible and<br />

efficient decision making process<br />

and sound strategic planning.n<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill now<br />

goes to a Senate-House Conference Committee to work<br />

●’<br />

differences.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> will be a member<br />

-<br />

of that conference.


“ Jim<br />

E<br />

Nebraska<br />

; <strong>News</strong>o<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Rt?lease, Friday, May 9, <strong>1986</strong><br />

———. ExoN SIIESNEW HOPE-FOR ETHANOL INDUSTRY ——<br />

WASH INGTON, D .C . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NE13) said the<br />

Secretary of Agriculture’s recent decision to aid financially<br />

distressed ethanol producers expresses a welcome change in the<br />

Department’s attitude toward the ethanol industry.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Department of Agriculture (USDA) recently announced a<br />

short-term program to allow financially distressed ethanol<br />

facilities to purchase government-owned grain at reduced costs to<br />

produce ethanol. <strong>Exon</strong> has contacted the USDA several times this<br />

year urging the agency to exercise authority to aid the ethanol<br />

industry.<br />

Falling oil prices in recent months have nearly forced<br />

several ethanol producers out of business. “This action will<br />

provide short-term relief for numerous ethanol producers. More<br />

importantly, it will maintain a much-needed market for America’s<br />

farmers who depend on the fuel ethanol industry important<br />

consumer of grain,” <strong>Exon</strong> wrote to the Agriculture Secretary.<br />

In the letter to the Agriculture Secretary, the Nebraska<br />

Senator said he hoped the USDA action<br />

“signals a renewed<br />

commitment to enhancement of the ethanol industry.”


U S ( . e n aS<br />

t o<br />

E<br />

Z<br />

N e b r<br />

S S R S O B C J<br />

‘ , D 2 2<br />

I<br />

R<br />

Z W I S<br />

r D ...........S ~ Z<br />

a $ a s a L w i s ~<br />

a f N a s<br />

W D w S A C S 8<br />

s a $ i c f e i P<br />

R C C T N<br />

● ) f w i s s C D<br />

o<br />

N C P O a n w s<br />

N S D ~ C K c d c<br />

i<br />

n<br />

d f r i o t<br />

t r b<br />

I<br />

a<br />

Z w i s f<br />

p c l e<br />

‘<br />

r<br />

g<br />

“:;ucha resultis particularlycriticalto a regionfacingthe<br />

t<br />

agriculturalcrisisand water shortages,nthey said.<br />

A $250,000federala~ropriation,the senatorssaid,would fund additionalweather<br />

s s s a<br />

d<br />

m<br />

m s a s e<br />

i<br />

p<br />

s<br />

a


N e b r<br />

Suite~SR-41;3, RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />

Contact:Art Jaqer<br />

‘Washington, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6552<br />

FOR IT~Il,TE RELEASE:‘by 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />

‘~ashi~ton,D.C............Fourhighlyqualifid<br />

‘iebraskahig”:: schoolstudentshave<br />

‘ken sf~lect ed to spenda year in “~rmanyunder an,exchangeprogrm sponsord jbintlyby<br />

,,.,,. ,;,,<br />

the U.S. Ccngressand the ‘dest“+rmanBundestag,Senators~ward Zorir?skyand J. James<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> s:~idttiay.<br />

in July and returnin mid-1987are SusannahY, Davis and JustinF.<br />

Lisa L. Hellbuschof<br />

?rand ISland,<br />

and TiffarI}’ D. Jones Of Orleans,<br />

among sophmores and juniorspicked for the progrm nationwide.<br />

App~ic~~ntstotaledmore than ~,000.<br />

Selectionis based totallyon merit.<br />

A~licants are nminat~<br />

‘D>’ their schoolsand<br />

must knve a grade point averageof at leaset3.2 on a 4.0 scale.<br />

Tncjsepicked for the programlivewith “~rmanhost familiesfor a<br />

“&man schools. Duri~ the yearl they cmplete ua~rs or projectson<br />

year and attend<br />

S ‘<br />

relationsthat are presentedto Congressand othersduringa visit to “Washingtonon their<br />

returr..


——<br />

330<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

0 Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

E’or Release, Monday, May 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />

NATIONAL EYE CARE PROJECT AVAILABLE TO NEEDY ELDERLY<br />

——-<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -. U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) said elderly<br />

Neloraskans who do not have a personal eye doctor should consider<br />

participating in the National Eye Care Project.<br />

<strong>The</strong> project is being sponsored by the American Academy of<br />

Ophthalmology and the Nebraska Academy of Ophthalmology to make<br />

professional medical eye care available to needy elderly persons. <strong>The</strong><br />

a<br />

out-of-pocket<br />

eye care services would be available to needy elderly at no<br />

cost to the patient.<br />

To qualify for the National Eye Care Project, a person must:<br />

1.) Be a U.S. citizen or legal resident; 2.) Be 65 years of age or<br />

olcier; 3.) Not have a personal ophthalmologist; 4.) Have need for a<br />

medical eye examination.<br />

Nebraskans 65 or older who are interested in participating in the<br />

pr(>gra]nshould call the toll-free number for Nebraska. <strong>The</strong> number<br />

is 1-830-222-EYES.<br />

<strong>The</strong> project’s emphasis is to aid the needy. If a patient does<br />

not:have Medicare or other health insurance, the physicians services<br />

are pr,~vided without charge. If the patient has Medicare or other<br />

health<br />

insurance, this will pay the entire cost of the physician’s<br />

s For this project only, volunteer ophthalmologists have<br />

agreed to accept Medicare and insurance assignment as payment in full,<br />

according to the Nebraska Academy of Ophthalmology.<br />

t<br />

-


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224.4224<br />

R T<br />

— R F D I F<br />

W S (D-NE)<br />

r e f i<br />

S f d s<br />

v p a p s I<br />

a p e i f<br />

y<br />

s<br />

S P r a a<br />

g i $ l<br />

1 E a t f i<br />

$ r pai,d<br />

$ N i t l N<br />

1<br />

END<br />

( M A S E<br />

F D S W<br />

S )


Nebraska<br />

0’ J“imE;on <strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

1<br />

For R Thursday, May 15, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—. EXON :;AYSGRAIN QUALITY STANDARDS NEED TO BE TOUGHER<br />

WASHINGTON~ D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is supporting<br />

legislation (S.1121) to tighten the quality standards of exported<br />

grain,<br />

‘ f p c g<br />

w s h s<br />

9<br />

q g b d o<br />

!?helegislation would prohibit the addition of any material, such<br />

as gr:~indust, to export shipments unless done to conform to a<br />

contrnct. Also, it would prohibit the addition of any nongrain<br />

m e t r c i<br />

f<br />

N S q e<br />

r A f U S a b<br />

c w m<br />

make f:ertain the clean grains American farmers produce and sell are<br />

what is d s<br />

need to act to clean up the dirty grain being<br />

sold,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />

said. “If the U.S. is to remain competitive on the world market the<br />

grain delivered must be of better quality<br />

than our foreign<br />

compe{:itors.”<br />

--END--


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Re lease, M<br />

EXON: ILEGISLAT 10N OFFERED TO STUDY AVIAT 10N SAFETY AND FAA<br />

W,4SHINGTON, D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has joined in<br />

introdl~cing legislation (S.2417) in the U.S. Senate to study ways to<br />

improv(~aviation<br />

safety.<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislation would create the Aviation Safety Commission,<br />

composed of seven members<br />

appointed by the President with the advice<br />

of Congress. <strong>The</strong> Commission would conduct an indepth study of the<br />

F A A ( e i<br />

● r p c<br />

a<br />

s<br />

aviation and ensure that it is safe,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said. “We want to make<br />

sure t!latsafety regulations and aircraft maintenance are not<br />

s e a p r<br />

Democratic member of the Senate Aviation Subcommittee.<br />

<strong>The</strong> study will examine whether the FAA has provided adequate<br />

re~our(:es to ensure aviation<br />

safety and if the FAA should be<br />

reorganized. <strong>The</strong> Commission would also be directed to make<br />

recommendations of how to improve enforcement of FAA safety<br />

regulations.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> i n a i<br />

●<br />

ensure<br />

)<br />

this study obvious,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> FAA has a responsibility to<br />

that airlines are properly meeting airplane maintenance<br />

scl~edules and that there is a sufficient number of inspectors and air<br />

trz~fficcontrollers so the flying public is safe,” he added.<br />

flk%b.oM<br />

--30--


●<br />

J<br />

Contact:<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Re!lease,Monday, May 19, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON E~AYSDON’T CHANGE DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME<br />

klASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />

daylight savings time should be kept as it is and “not be<br />

extended for an additional three weeks. <strong>Exon</strong> made the remarks<br />

in a speech on the Senate floor during consideration of<br />

legislation to extend daylight savings time.<br />

●<br />

“Leave well enough alonerw <strong>Exon</strong> said in opposing the<br />

proposed extension. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator expressed concern that<br />

extending daylight savings time would jeopardize the safety of<br />

school children in the mornings. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator said<br />

parents would disagree with claims that extending daylight<br />

savings time would not increase the number of accidents or<br />

crimes involving children.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposal would extend daylight savings time by three<br />

weeks by changing the starting date from the fourth to the first<br />

Sunday in April.<br />

E e f w b e<br />

d s “ d s<br />

h g n f h s<br />

s t f E d savings would<br />

reduce the morning daylight time those farmers would have to do<br />

chores;before they go to their second job,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

‘Extending daylight savings would be another bad blow to<br />

farmers. <strong>The</strong> farm workday is determined by when the sun rises<br />

and sets not by a clock.” <strong>Exon</strong> said. He pointed out that<br />

farmers active in their communities in the evenings would lose<br />

workir~g hours if daylight savings were extended since they—<br />

would<br />

have to quit b s<br />

used as a main argument against the proposed<br />

extension, a letter he received from the American Farm<br />

which opposes any extension of daylight savings time.<br />

“.<br />

--END--<br />

Bureau


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

,<strong>News</strong><br />

. I Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

,,<br />

FOR R T<br />

— T P G<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND Z<br />

i t N r $<br />

t p g<br />

D T Mass T<br />

A<br />

a a $33,200 N<br />

D R $ O<br />

g p a<br />

d<br />

r t e h<br />

t<br />

p<br />

--END--<br />

rJg8b•0s1<br />

1


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong>,<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Rele:~se~ Friday, May 23, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—————.—— RAISE THIIAUTHORIZATION —— OF THE NORTH ——. LOUP PROJECT<br />

WAS1iINGTON , D .C. -- NEBRASKA U.S . SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED<br />

ZORIN’SKYare cal1ing for an increase in the authorization of the North<br />

Loup Project<br />

in central Nebraska.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senators are cosponsors of legislation (S.1704)<br />

which wo~lld increase from $193 million to $334 million the federal<br />

authorization<br />

for the North Loup Project.<br />

“tlowthat the project is more than 50 percent complete, it is<br />

●’impo~tanl: to ensure that the construction timeline not be interrupted<br />

so that (construction may continue without delayr~<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky<br />

said in t~letter to Senate Energy Committee Chairman Jim McClure<br />

(R-IDAHO].<br />

<strong>The</strong> Bureau of Reclamation has informed the Nebraska Senators that<br />

the incrt:asedauthorization is needed to prevent construction delays.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Administration is supporting the requested authorization increase.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two Senators said “much of the increased cost for the project<br />

is attril)utable to safety considerations made apparent in connection<br />

with the Teton Dam disaster.” <strong>The</strong> Teton Dam gave way during a flood<br />

nearly 10 years ago. <strong>The</strong> design of several projects, including the<br />

North Lo~Ip,were changed to strengthen the dams from flood damage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> North Loup project located in Greeley, Nance, Howard and<br />

●’<br />

Valley counties in Nebraska will irrigate approximately 53,000 acres.<br />

It is estimated for completion in the early 1990s.<br />

d4~905&<br />

--END--


e I<br />

J<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R Wednesday, May 28, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXC)NS;!YSSUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS HA~ PLUSES FOR FARMERS<br />

~—<br />

Wj\SHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />

Supplerlental Appropriations Bill now before the Senate contains<br />

importi~ntchanges for agriculture.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong>, a Senate Budget Committee member, said the<br />

Supplemental Appropriations bill includes a provision to prevent<br />

the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from requiring detailed<br />

mileag(> logs for business vehicles. <strong>The</strong> provision would require<br />

the IRi;to reinstate the mileage record keeping regulations which<br />

existec~ prio,r to 1984 when contemporaneous logbooks were not<br />

required for business vehicles.<br />

‘(;ongress thought it corrected the mileage record keeping<br />

issue last year by prohibiting the IRS from requiring detailed<br />

mileag{: logs for business vehicles, but the IRS created further<br />

confusion when it rewrote the regulations implying logs were<br />

nec’esst~ry,”<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill also contains a measure giving insolvent farmers a<br />

six-month extension to amend their tax returns dating back as far<br />

as 1982 to take advantage of a recent tax law change. <strong>The</strong> recent<br />

tax ch


SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />

Contact:Art Jaege]<br />

Washi~]ton,D,C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />

FOR I’T~I?,TERELEASE:Way 31, <strong>1986</strong><br />

ZORINSKYAl~ EXON SEEK 1.00PERCEIWFEDERALFTJWI‘isFOR W:q PApIO CREEK PLAY<br />

‘flashiq ton, D,C............SenatorsEdward Zorinsky(D.-web.)and J. James <strong>Exon</strong> (D.-<br />

web.) have urged the retentionof full fderal<br />

financingfor the scaleddown l?apioCreek<br />

floodcontrolprojectin an3 aroundMaha.<br />

In a Yay 28 letterto the SenateWater ResourcesSub~ittee,<br />

ZorinskyanclEXOn<br />

enthusiasticallyendorsd the reducedArmy Corps of Engineersplan, which would cut the<br />

●project::scost from $120 million to million.<br />

But, the senatorsadded, the scaled-downproposalshouldnot come under new federal<br />

cost-sharingprovisionswhich would requirefive percentlocal funding.<br />

“We str2nglysuggest,” Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said, “that it would be in the national<br />

interestto...retainthe more favorablecost-sharingprovisionsfor old projectslike<br />

Papio that seek to down-sizeand rduce cost...“<br />

Retentionof 100 percentfederalfundingfor such projects,they said, would encourage<br />

local interestsin other areas to rduce the scope and cost of theirprojects.<br />

‘If old projectsseekingnew, less-costlyand scaled-downchanqesin their<br />

authorizationsare deemedcompletelynew projects,ad<br />

thereforesubjectto the new costsharingprovisions~<br />

projectsponsorswill find t<br />

actuallyincreasingtheirown<br />

constructionoutlayswhile dramaticallyreducingoverallsize and ctost,”the senators<br />

said.<br />

●<br />

‘Thiswould seem to act as a powerfuldisincentivefor project1.edificationsthat<br />

might otherwisebe palatableto local interests...”they said.


In the revisalPapioCreek plan, 16 still-to-be-builtdams would be<br />

rep]acedby<br />

channelimprovaents,an electronicfloodwarningsystemand othermore m~(?st ch?~nqes.<br />

However,the plan would 1not affectother sites alreadyccnnpletdor under construction,<br />

such as DamSites18 and<br />

After severalyears , of debate and discussion,the scaled-downproposalwas @ndorsd<br />

the Corps of Engineersa<br />

nd affectedMaha-area governmentsin mid-April.<br />

<strong>The</strong> plan now neds<br />

approvalfrom Congress,<br />

--


U S ( . e n aS<br />

t o<br />

E<br />

Z<br />

N e b r<br />

SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />

Contact:Art Jaeger<br />

?Vashiqton,D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />

FOR I?-IATE RELEASE:June 5, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATORSrJR~ FEDERALFr~S FOR LO[ll? RIl~ WATER STrJDY<br />

Washington,D.C............S ~ Z<br />

a i $ c a f m<br />

c N R B<br />

June 3 lettersto the SenateAppropriationsCannittee,Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> noted<br />

that,until lastyear, Wbraska had fundedand cotiuctedthe studyon its own.<br />

Howeveri,they said,IItheCmplexity of the Sati Hillsregionhas made it a<br />

P<br />

B R n p c<br />

a<br />

c<br />

b w w w s p s a<br />

f i s s $<br />

appropriat~,late lastyear to begin the jointeffort,they not~.<br />

ZOrinS@<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> asked that the $50,000be includedin the energya<br />

appropriationsbill for the next 12-monthperiod.<br />

water<br />

<strong>The</strong> study is looki~ at potentialirrigationprojects,water for powerplants,flow<br />

needsand watermanagementtechniquesfor the North,Yiddleand SouthLOUp riversand<br />

theirtributaries.<br />

<strong>The</strong> firstcunprehensivestudyof the Loup RiverBasin, it will focus initiallyon the<br />

possibledamningof the CedarCreek area near Spalding.


2<br />

‘ .........~ ~ Z (D.-Wb.) had a perfectattendance<br />

r S r v t f m<br />

F c S mocratic PolicyC show therewere 106<br />

c J t<br />

s % r<br />

Z a<br />

of thin.<br />

Z c a r S<br />

a<br />

p<br />

p<br />

— —


U S f . e n aS t o .<br />

E<br />

Z<br />

N e b r<br />

suite SR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding Contact:Art Jaeger<br />

Washiwton, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />

FOR I-IATE RELEASE:June 5, <strong>1986</strong><br />

FrJNDPOW SOLVIN7DA’4SITE 18 P~BLEYt ZORIVSKYAm EXON TJRTE<br />

Washington,D.C,...........SenatorsMward Zorinskyand J. James EXOIIhave urgd the<br />

Senateto f~~ndconstructionof a water storagepond that would permit the lakebehind Dam<br />

Site outside@aha to be filled.<br />

<strong>The</strong> potilwould receivesewageeffluent-- the liquidby-productof sewagetreatment--<br />

now flowiw intoBoxelderCreek upstreamfran the dam.<br />

Presenceof the effluentin the creek has preventedthe closingof the dam and<br />

edevelo~ent of PapioLake No. 18<br />

for boating, fishingand other recreationuses.<br />

In two June 3 lettersto the .SenateAppropriationsCmittee, Zorinskyand ~on urg~<br />

that the Army Corpsof Erqineersbe permittd to redirect$1.1million to design and<br />

constructthe storagepond at the SkylinePalf Courseon West CenterRoad.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effluent,fran two nearbysewage t~eatmentplants,would collectin the pod<br />

and<br />

be used<br />

both to irrigateand fertilizethe golf course.<br />

Diversionof the effluentfrom BoxelderCreek would clear the way for liftinga ban on<br />

rti~reational activitiesati closingthe dam, locatedat<br />

Zorinskyad<br />

appropriation.<br />

156thand F streets.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> stressedthat their requestwould not requirean additional<br />

‘It is apparentthatwith proper authorityfrm Congressto do so, the Corpsmay<br />

redirectad<br />

o<br />

use currentlyauthorizd futis to build the Lagoonwithoutrequiringan addon<br />

approprial:ion,” they said.<br />

.,


Z<br />

and <strong>Exon</strong> askd the AppropriationsComnitteeto include‘languagepermitting<br />

o<br />

constructionof the pond in the energyand water appropriationsbill for the next fiscal<br />

y<br />

senators’requestfollowsrecmendations<br />

resultiw frm a consensus-building effortby the<br />

Control.<br />

—<br />

made by Waha<br />

area governmentsand<br />

NebraskaWpartment of Environmental


U S f . e n aS<br />

t o<br />

●1 E Z<br />

N e b r<br />

— —<br />

SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />

Contact:Art Jaeger<br />

i~ashim~ton, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />

FOR I*f~IF,TERELEASE:June 8, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATEPASSES<br />

‘Washington, D.C............Senator~ward Zorinsky(D.-*b.)<br />

l b I R S f<br />

has haild S<br />

t<br />

passage<br />

d r d b<br />

l c Z N<br />

S<br />

t<br />

a a 5 a b s a<br />

expectd c C m 8<br />

0 ) Z e a s a s<br />

c<br />

t<br />

v r e<br />

a b v<br />

L e a i a a r<br />

d<br />

<strong>The</strong> IRS,however,subsequentlyi r r t r<br />

d n p t a b v Z<br />

●<br />

l p 5 o r ‘ r<br />

b v “ e a b<br />

d<br />

S g t i<br />

p b t Z s “ l<br />

p b f f b


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

,1 Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R<br />

i<br />

E D OLD NATURAL GAS PRICES NARROWLY DEFEATED<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate by a 48 to<br />

defeated legislation offered by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON<br />

preverlt the administrative decontrol of “old” natural<br />

47 narrowly<br />

(D-NEB) to<br />

gas which would<br />

raise consumer prices.<br />

!l’hel o a S<br />

●<br />

A<br />

( a b p<br />

i<br />

a F E m<br />

R C ( w would allow the price of “old”<br />

natural gas to increase from $1.50 to a high of $2.57 per (Mcf)<br />

thousand cubic feet. Natural gas drilled prior to 1978 is classified<br />

as “oldm gas.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is trying to defy the<br />

will clfCongress which intended that ‘old’ natural gas prices would not<br />

be decontrolledrm <strong>Exon</strong> said. “If implemented the FERC rule would take<br />

billic~ns of dollars out of the pockets of farmers, homeowners, and<br />

small business owners and put it into the pockets of the major oil<br />

compar~ies who own the vast majority of natural gas reserves.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> amendment was cosponsored by U.S. Senator Ed Zorinsky and nine<br />

other senators.<br />

●<br />

decided<br />

Under the 1978 Natural Gas Policy Act the Congress explicitly<br />

not to decontrol the prices of ~oldn natural gas, according to<br />

<strong>Exon</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Congress reaffirmed the decision in 1983. <strong>The</strong> amendment<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXON<br />

“OLD” NATURAL GAS<br />

would have prevented the implementation of the new FERC rule by<br />

●<br />

blocking funds designated to implement the decontrol regulations.<br />

Republican senators generally supported the oil companies position<br />

while most Democrats supported <strong>Exon</strong>’s proposal p c<br />

a b R A<br />

R c S a t p<br />

D c S p<br />

c t c v s<br />

“ c l<br />

scheme where cheaper<br />

‘old’ natural gas prices, now regulated because<br />

the production<br />

costs have been charged off<br />

‘new’ gas prices with their attendant higher discovery and production<br />

costs,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

END<br />

COMMllTEEON<br />

THEBUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release~ Tuesday, June 10, <strong>1986</strong><br />

— EXON SUPPORTS IRA TAX CREDIT<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- “I am pleased to be an original cosponsor<br />

of this amendment to establish a 15% tax credit for Individual<br />

Retirement Account contributions. I have been working on this issue<br />

for several weeks as part of an IRA Task Force appointed by Senate<br />

Democratic Leader, Senator Robert Byrd, to find an alternative to<br />

eliminating the IRA deduction. <strong>The</strong> solution to the IRA ‘problem’ now<br />

has broad bipartisan support. This amendment will make a good tax<br />

reform bill even better by providing a tax credit for all taxpayers<br />

with Individual Retirement Accounts,M Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong>~id at a news<br />

conference held to announce support for a tax credit for Individual<br />

Retirement Accounts.<br />

●<br />

would<br />

‘Congress made the right decision in 1981 when we extended IRAS<br />

to those with private pension plans. To go back now to prior law<br />

be wrong. IRAs are a savings incentive for the middle class and<br />

an important source for new investment capital. With the strains on<br />

thl~Social Security System, the Congress should be looking for ways to<br />

en(:ourage retirement savings, rather than discouraging it,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“When the Senate Finance Committee bill was reported several<br />

weeks ago, I said I support restoring at least a partial deduction for<br />

all taxpayers with IRAs. This amendment will accomplish that goal of<br />

restoring about one-half of the IRA deduction without damaging the Tax<br />

Reform bill. Our amendment simply makes a good Tax Reform bill even<br />

better,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> IRA amendment will be offered to the Tax Reform Bill (HR3838)<br />

by U.S. SenatOrS Chris Dodd (D-CONN), Al D’Amato (R-NY), Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

(D-NEB), Don Riegle (D-MICH), Alan Cranston (D-CALIF), Pete Wilson<br />

(R.-CALIF) and Frank Murkowski (R-ALASKA) .<br />

END


<strong>News</strong><br />

FoiKRelease, Monday, June 16, <strong>1986</strong><br />

ENERGY DEPARTMENT AWARDS GRANT TO UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

were informed Monday that the University of Nebraska-Lincoln was<br />

awarded $51,560 of a three-year grant totalling $S62,550.<br />

<strong>The</strong> U.S. Department of Energy awarded the grant to the<br />

University of Nebraska-Lincoln Physics Department to conduct<br />

magnetic studies of iron-rare-earth metalloid alloys. <strong>The</strong><br />

remaining grant will be awarded as funds become<br />

available<br />

according to Department of Energy.<br />

END


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Tuesday, June 17, <strong>1986</strong><br />

MINUTEMAN MISSILE MOTORS CONTRACT AWARDED<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C . -- <strong>The</strong> Air Fo~ce informed U.S. SENATORS<br />

JINIEXON AND ED ZORINSKY that a Lincoln firm will perform nearly<br />

20 per(:ent of the work under a $14,635,972 contract awarded<br />

Tuesda~~. <strong>The</strong> contract was awarded for the manufacture of 160<br />

motors to upgrade existing Minuteman III missiles.<br />

BKunswick Corporation of Lincoln, Nebraska, a major<br />

subcontractor will perform 17 percent of the work. Brunswick<br />

*<br />

manufactures the motor cases for the rocket motors. <strong>The</strong> contract<br />

was awa~ded to United Technologies Corporation, Chemical System<br />

Divisic}n, of California who is the main contractor.<br />

END


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

Release, Tuesday, June 17, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— USNS CORNHUSKER STATE<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- S<br />

i<br />

U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON today that the Navy has assigned<br />

the name<br />

USNS CORNHUSKER<br />

STATE to a ship that will be part of the Rapid<br />

Deployment<br />

Joint Task Force.<br />

<strong>The</strong> USNS CORNHUSKER<br />

STATE will be a specially converted<br />

crane ship designed to rapidly unload military equipment and<br />

supplies from supply ships for the Rapid Deployment Joint Task<br />

Force. It will serve as needed in the Maritime Administration’s<br />

Ready Reserve Fleet and be operated by the Military Sealift<br />

C e d<br />

E r D m S<br />

S F P S the USNS<br />

CORNHUSKER STATE will be an excellent addition to two other ships<br />

named in honor of Nebraska, the oiler USS PLATTE and the attack<br />

submarine USS OMAHA which are also serving in the U.S. Navy.<br />

END


<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Tuesday, June 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXO@ISUPPORTS TAX REFORM; EMPHASIZES POSITIVE ASPECTS FOR AG<br />

——<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) today in a<br />

Senate speech emphasizing the positive effects for agriculture said<br />

that he will support final passage of the Senate Tax Reform bill.<br />

“Particularly pleasing is the positive impact that this tax bill<br />

will have on agriculture. It will permit farmers and other<br />

self-employed workers to deduct up to one-half of their health<br />

insurance costs. It attacks the tax shelters which have encouraged<br />

non--farmers to ‘farm’ the tax Code. e d<br />

p s a s would be doubled to i<br />

ten years. <strong>The</strong> bill greatly restricts the tax losses that can be<br />

written-off by those not earning their living primarily from<br />

agriculture,!’ <strong>Exon</strong> told the Senate.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said he is glad that the Senate<br />

included the amendment he<br />

cosponsored to restore income averaging for agriculture.<br />

included is a provision to protect farmers and ranchers from being<br />

taxed on the amount of the debt<br />

forgiven by their lenders.<br />

“This is not a perfect bill, as is customary with measures we<br />

produce here. I am hopeful that the House-Senate Conference can iron<br />

out the shortcomings and report back even a better bill for a final<br />

vote?,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Th,2Nebraska Senator said one major disappointment with the<br />

Senate tax reform bill are the restrictions placed on Individual<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXON<br />

TAX REFORM<br />

Retirement Accounts.<br />

‘Congress made the right decision in 1981 when<br />

we made IRAs available to all working Ame~icans. With the strains on @<br />

the Social Security system, the Congress should be looking for ways to<br />

encourage retirement savings and capital formation, rather than<br />

discouraging it.<br />

I am convinced that the conferees on this bill will<br />

protect at least a partial IRA benefit for all taxpayers, which has<br />

been my goal,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong>, a member of the Senate Budget Committee said he is<br />

concerned about the drastic yearly revenue swings that result from the<br />

tax reform bill.<br />

‘While the bill is revenue neutral over five years,<br />

the great swings each year could pose significant problems for the<br />

budget process and the economy.<br />

I look forward to working with my<br />

colleagues on the Budget Committee and others to address this<br />

problem,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“On balance, this bill is a vast improvement over the current tax<br />

code and the tax bill passed by the House of Representatives. It<br />

●<br />

lowers the basic tax rates for both individuals and corporations.<br />

It<br />

closes a number of tax shelters, so that business decisions will be<br />

made for economic reasons~ rather than tax reasons. It also<br />

strengthens the minimum corporate tax, so that profitable corporations<br />

will start paying their fair share of the tax burden,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

-


Nebraska<br />

●<br />

Jim E;on <strong>News</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

For Release, Tuesday, June 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />

——. EXON: SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS BILL GETS PRIORITY<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) got a<br />

commitment last week from Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-KS) that<br />

the Su~?plemental Appropriations bill conference report will receive<br />

priority consideration when it is<br />

Re~)ressntatives.<br />

completed<br />

by the House of<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill affects payments<br />

to<br />

farmers by the Commodity<br />

Credit<br />

Corporation<br />

(CCC) which have been<br />

delayed in an extended joint<br />

House-Senate Conference. <strong>Exon</strong> has been pushing for quick approval by<br />

th(:Congress. <strong>The</strong> Supplemental Appropriations bill will allow the CCC<br />

to resume making deficiency payments under the <strong>1986</strong> farm program.<br />

In addition the bill prohibits funding studies to examine the<br />

sale of the nation’s power marketing administrations which includes<br />

the Western Area Power Administration that serves Nebraska. Sale of<br />

th(apower marketing administrations, as proposed by the Reagan<br />

Administration, could increase the cost of electricity generated by<br />

hydropower<br />

plants.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill also includes provisions to extend the legal authority<br />

of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) to guarantee home<br />

mortgages. With lower interest rates , many new home buyers want to<br />

buy homes, but are being delayed by the lack of gurantee authority<br />

from FHA.<br />

-


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Re].ease, Tuesday, June 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON GE;TSASSURANCES FOR NEBRASKA TRANSITION RULES<br />

W7\SHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) received<br />

assurar]ces from Senate Finance Committee Chairman Bob Packwood<br />

(R-ORE) and ranking Democrat Russell Long (D-LA) that four<br />

historic preservation projects in Nebraska would be considered<br />

for trzlnsition rules in the joint Senate-House Conference<br />

Committee<br />

on Tax Reform.<br />

Tklefour projects are: 1.) Waterpark, a 41-unit condominium<br />

development in Lincoln, Nebr.; S Fruit Building, a<br />

three-story warehouse in Lincoln, being converted to office<br />

s H.P. Lau Building and Annex in Lincolnr an office and<br />

retail conversion; and 4.) <strong>The</strong> McKesson Robbins housing project,<br />

I<br />

a Part of the Central park Mall Development in Omaha, Nebr.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said in letters to Packwood<br />

and Long that “it is<br />

essential the four Nebraska projects be exempted from the<br />

reductions in the historic preservation tax credit and from the<br />

binding contract requirement dealing with changes in<br />

depreciation.”<br />

END


J“im330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

./ Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Rt~lease,Wednesday, June 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON SAYS NO—<br />

TO SMITHSONIAN FUNDING<br />

WASHINGTON D.C. -- Citing the higher priority needs of<br />

Am.eric:a’sfarmers and ranchers U~S. SENATOR JIM EXON- (D-NEB)<br />

attem~)ted to block a $15 million funding request for two<br />

research projects operated by the Smithsonian Institution.<br />

Dxon told the Senate he had “no particular bone to pick<br />

with the Smithsonian Institution. Indeed, it is a national<br />

treasllre.” <strong>Exon</strong> objected to the Smithsonian funding saying it<br />

would add to the budget deficit and that there were higher<br />

priorities in agriculture.<br />

●<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

E:xonsaid it is inconsistent for those who voted for the<br />

Gramm-.Rudman law to vote for these additional funding requests.<br />

\’otedagainst Gramm-Rudman because of the devastating<br />

impact:it will have on American agriculture.<br />

“We cannot make progress in reducing federal spending if we<br />

pile clnadditional new obligations in future years which are not<br />

absol~~tely essential. I cannot vote for this funding while<br />

Americfa’s farmers, ranchers and main street businessmen are in a<br />

full-scale depression and the government programs to assist them<br />

are being cutr” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislation would authorize $11.1 million for the<br />

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama and $4.5<br />

million for the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory in Arizona.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> acknowledged that important work goes on at both<br />

facilities.<br />

‘Important work is also being performed on America’s farms<br />

and ranches, in our cities and all over this country. Yet,<br />

agriculture and other important government programs have felt<br />

the indiscriminate budget cuts of Gramm-Rudman which is the<br />

law,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Over <strong>Exon</strong>’s objections the Senate approved the Smithsonian<br />

$15 million funding on an 87-13 vote.<br />

-


Jim<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

i 1<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bow~en<br />

Telephone: 202-224-4224<br />

W<br />

W R<br />

a<br />

S (<br />

Once! a A s b<br />

m e i m f A<br />

s<br />

p a d<br />

u w p p A<br />

s l w p<br />

In the s w f d<br />

p s e c r a m<br />

, e D A<br />

●A<br />

p p p<br />

w c s<br />

D d<br />

m f p i<br />

T P r t n s<br />

q d s a<br />

p<br />

t<br />

e<br />

<strong>The</strong> Reagan Administration would have b<br />

i e s A a<br />

T b t I d n<br />

y t p w s<br />

c p p h a s<br />

w d o u d<br />

l c a p t<br />

f s a c a w<br />

d I s a a p I<br />

view it.<br />

A<br />

p r i<br />

e i d i<br />

l a (<br />

h r M u<br />

p i d b<br />

$21!.8 b 1 a p<br />

r p r i<br />

f n b w d It<br />

‘ s r A t away<br />

at b f s g N<br />

d


a d p f c<br />

w a p p<br />

p t p B<br />

t a a<br />

u<br />

p e c<br />

c s o b s<br />

p U S a<br />

b<br />

n<br />

Some s e i a<br />

p e C i<br />

p p s l<br />

c w a C c p<br />

a h e<br />

t a a<br />

C a B i<br />

w p 4 p s 2 m<br />

e m m<br />

I a s w p l<br />

e h I<br />

p p s a<br />

p<br />

A s<br />

t w p<br />

e<br />

p m A f i<br />

t r c d u<br />

p<br />

a c f p c<br />

A f s c<br />

p c p g b<br />

d s y<br />

s f e f e<br />

p m w n<br />

p b c c a m<br />

p m g r f e<br />

b i m i a d<br />

A b p s b<br />

r d s r c “<br />

a d b<br />

i<br />

s<br />

f<br />

i a c m<br />

a s A f<br />

c p I them to send a message to the<br />

President and Congress that current policies are not acceptable<br />

and that they are willing to do their part in reducing government<br />

subsidies and improving farm prices.<br />

END


●’ said. END<br />

●<br />

Jim<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

I<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Wednesdayr June 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS BILL<br />

——<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />

Wednesday he has obtained a commitment from Senate Majority<br />

Leader Bob Dole (R-KS) that the Emergency Supplemental<br />

Appropriations Bill will be considered by the Senate no later<br />

than 4:00 pm this afternoon.<br />

<strong>The</strong> House of Representatives passed the bill by voice vote<br />

Tuesday<br />

evening.<br />

●<br />

<strong>The</strong> measure frees up funds for agricultural and other<br />

necessary government programs to keep them operating. <strong>The</strong><br />

Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS)<br />

offices, for example, have been prevented from issuing checks to<br />

farmers who have qualified under the current Farm Bill.<br />

Last week <strong>Exon</strong> obtained a promise from Dole to give priority<br />

collsidsration to the bill in the Senate after it had been<br />

approved by the House.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> also reported that Dole assured him the President had<br />

ag]:eed to sign the measure after earlier threatening a veto over<br />

certain Rural Electrification Administration provisions agreed to<br />

by the Congress.<br />

“I am confident we can approve this measure today,n <strong>Exon</strong>


I<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

a’Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

—<br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Re lease, Wednesday, June 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />

CRETE :2ECEIVES AIRPORT GRANT<br />

————.<br />

W/4SHINGTON , D .C . -- U .S . SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

were i]~formedWednesday afternoon that Crete is being awarded a<br />

$152,1(]0 grant.<br />

<strong>The</strong> grant is awarded under the Federal Aviation<br />

Administration’s Airport Improvement Program. <strong>The</strong> funds will be<br />

used to purchase land, extend the airport runway and install<br />

●<br />

aviation<br />

runway lighting. Money for these grants comes from taxes paid on<br />

fuel, passenger tickets and other aviation related<br />

activities.<br />

END


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

a Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

For Release, Thursday, June 26, <strong>1986</strong><br />

Lincoln F irm Receives Mul timillion Dollar Contract<br />

WAS141NGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

we’re informed today that the Telex Communications Company of<br />

Lincoln has received a multimillion dollar U.S. Army contract.<br />

<strong>The</strong> U.S. Army awarded the Telex Company a $7,678,416<br />

contract<br />

to build 44,256 antennas.


Nebraska<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

For Release, Fr iday, June 27, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON LAUDS APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS<br />

——.—..——..——<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C. -- Following several days of careful<br />

shepherding and frequent needling by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) the<br />

Congress approved the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Bill which<br />

will allow resumption of Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) payments<br />

to farmers.<br />

Following approval by both Houses of Congress Thursday night, the<br />

●<br />

earlier<br />

bill goes to the President who has promised to sign it after an<br />

veto threat.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> repeated funding interruption of the Commodity Credit<br />

Corporation has played havoc with farm income,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “This<br />

action means the Commodity Credit Corporation will stop living from<br />

hand-to-mouth<br />

he added.<br />

since<br />

it will have funds through the end of the year,”<br />

Tilebill<br />

contains $5.3 billion for the Commodity Credit<br />

Corporation to continue meeting deficiency payments through the end of<br />

the fiscal year.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> noted that the emergency appropriations bill also prohibits<br />

studyit~g the Administration’s proposal to sell the power marketing<br />

administrations.<br />

●<br />

Reagan<br />

“Selling the power marketing administrations, as proposed by the<br />

Administration, may be good for big business, but it would be<br />

bad for consumers,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. Nebraska is served by the Western Area<br />

Power ;qdministration.<br />

END


I<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

For Release, Monday, June 30, <strong>1986</strong><br />

OMAHA PRESS CONFERENCE ON WHEAT POLL<br />

.-—<br />

T7ASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

OF NEEJRASKAAND TOM HARKIN OF IOWA WILL HOLD A PRESS CONFERENCE<br />

IN OMAHA TUESDAY TO DISCUSS THE WHEAT REFERENDUM POLL.<br />

THE PRESS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JULY 1, AT<br />

THE MORNING AT OMAHA EPPLEY AIRPORT. IT WILL BE HELD IN<br />

THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY BOARD ROOM LOCATED IN THE SOUTH TERMINAL.<br />

END


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Rc:lease, Tuesdav, Julv 1, <strong>1986</strong><br />

CONTRACT AWARD<br />

M~ASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

were r~otified Tuesday afternoon that a l~ebraska firm has been<br />

awarded a multimillion dollar construction contract.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Department of Energy announced that the Kiewit<br />

Construction Company of Omaha has been awarded a $17.5 million<br />

contr~.ct to construct a 40 inch diameter crude oil pipeline from<br />

Freepcrt to Texas City, Texas. <strong>The</strong> pipeline will be<br />

●’ approximately 46 miles long when completed.<br />

END


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone: 202-224-4224<br />

FOR RELEASE, SATURDAY, JULY 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATOR EXON APPLAUDS-AMERICAN-GOLD BULLION COIN DESIGNS<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C.. -- SENATOR J. JAMES EXON (D-NE) sponsor of<br />

the American Gold Bullion Coin Act applauded the gold bullion<br />

coin designs just released by the United States Mint.<br />

America’s first regular issue gold coinage in fifty years<br />

will feature Liberty holding a torch in her right hand and an<br />

●’<br />

olive branch in her left hand on the coins’<br />

Of ~=agles on the coins’<br />

reverse.<br />

obverse<br />

and a family<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> new coin designs are attractive pieces of art which<br />

represent basic American values of liberty, freedom and the<br />

family.”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Under the <strong>Exon</strong> legislation, which was signed into law by the<br />

President in December of last year, the new American gold bullion<br />

coinage will be available October 1, <strong>1986</strong>. <strong>The</strong> American Gold<br />

Bullion Coin Act authorizes the minting of gold coins in one<br />

ounce, one-half ounce, one-quarter ounce and one-tenth ounce<br />

siz(ss. <strong>The</strong> coins will carry a nominal face value of fifty,<br />

twenty-five, ten and five dollars respectively and will be sold<br />

at the price of gold plus a service charge to cover the cost of<br />

- MORE -


EXON<br />

EXON APPLAUDS COIN DESIGNS<br />

p d p<br />

m s w p A<br />

K<br />

r<br />

S n p l<br />

p A a S A c<br />

A c e<br />

a i S A<br />

s<br />

c A p f<br />

o p S A g<br />

K p C<br />

c A B m<br />

y<br />

d c <strong>Exon</strong> legislation<br />

mandates that only American gold be used in the new coinage.<br />

A p a b<br />

f c y a A<br />

c a p i U<br />

S o e e o<br />

l d b A S<br />

f t d p t<br />

1 f e d c D<br />

s Miley Busiek.<br />

END


●<br />

Jim <strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

F012RELEASE, MONDAY, JULY 14, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON URGES IMMEDIATE APPROVAL OF DISASTER AID FOR DAWES COUNTY<br />

—.—<br />

Washington D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) today<br />

appealed to President Reagan to immediately approve federal<br />

disaster<br />

aid for Dawes County.<br />

In a letter to President Reagan, Senator <strong>Exon</strong> wrote; “<strong>The</strong><br />

Governor of Nebraska has, today, requested that you declare a<br />

major disaster for Nebraska due to severe storms which caused<br />

heavy damage in Dawes County, Nebraska on June 30th.W<br />

●<br />

“<strong>The</strong> preliminary estimates of damage total over $16<br />

million. This cost estimate is very high and beyond the<br />

capabilities of the State and affected local government without<br />

Federal assistance. In addition, this storm devastation comes on<br />

top of an already serverely depressed rural economy. It is<br />

therefore critically important that disaster assistance be<br />

forthcoming in the near future. I, therefore, respectfully<br />

request your immediate attention to and expeditious approval of<br />

this disaster request,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

END


—<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

. I Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R . F<br />

—-— EXC)NC,4LLSON USDA-TO US~ POWER TO AVERT GRAIN STORAGE SHORTAGE<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has c<br />

S A e a<br />

s l a f i<br />

s<br />

‘ p C C C C<br />

a S A s f<br />

● of<br />

loans available to farmers,M <strong>Exon</strong> said in a letter to the Secretary<br />

Agriculture. “In fact, the Charter states that in storage<br />

deficient areas the Secretary shall make such a<br />

a<br />

<strong>The</strong> letter went on to say, “I strongly urge you to exercise<br />

all<br />

authority available to mitigate this situation, including authority<br />

mandating loans for storage deficient areas.w<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nebraska<br />

Senator said farmers are feeling the effects of a<br />

storage shortage now, “but an even bigger crunch will come this fall<br />

when fe,rmersmay be forced to pile grain on the streets due<br />

to a lack<br />

of storage.n<br />

“Crops look M a<br />

t d m v<br />

r N “ i w<br />

● l s f a<br />

the letter.


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

- ~:~m<strong>Exon</strong><br />

Contact:<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

) t<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

Fox ReI.ease, Tuesday, July 22,<br />

EXO)NURGES APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL MONEy FOR NORTH LOUP pROJECT<br />

— .—<br />

WllSHINGTON, D .C . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) today urged<br />

the Senate Water and Power Subcommittee to approve an additional $140<br />

million to complete the North Loup w p<br />

i w l n<br />

entirely justifiable,” <strong>Exon</strong> told the Senate subcommittee. ‘<strong>The</strong>y stem<br />

l from safety considerations required after the Teton Dam<br />

disastc?r occurred,” he added. A disaster at the Teton Dam in Idaho in<br />

●<br />

~ the mi~[-197~’s prompted the Bureau of Reclamation to create higher<br />

standards for dams after Congress made the first appropriation for the<br />

North Loup project in 1972.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said the additional<br />

funds<br />

are necessary to complete the<br />

I<br />

Davis C!reekDam southwest of Scotia<br />

If the cost ceiling on this project<br />

have tc stop by the end of’the 1987<br />

and numerous irrigation canals.<br />

is not raised, construction will<br />

construction season.<br />

‘Klot funding this project to completion would be the most<br />

wasteful action the Congress could take. ..It would be tatamount to<br />

building a house an then not putting a roof on it,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “What<br />

we cannot afford is a half-built project, which would stand as a<br />

monument to Congresst lack of faith with those who are counting on<br />

● ) -<br />

project,”<br />

he added.


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R W<br />

E E P A<br />

~ D f<br />

S a a<br />

c S (D-NEE3)e E<br />

E P S U b<br />

a<br />

p<br />

g<br />

U S f a h a s<br />

s s g s A<br />

f p C D<br />

A E E P a i<br />

a<br />

e e C S<br />

d p b r p<br />

a<br />

g<br />

e C p<br />

S p g d p<br />

y<br />

‘ d s S<br />

i q r<br />

m b p f c<br />

s m a m<br />

eligible for the Export Enhancement Program,” he added.<br />

●l<br />

<strong>The</strong> Export Enhancement Program is designed to expand sales of<br />

agricultural products by offering export sales bonuses from Commodity<br />

Credit Corporation stocks. <strong>The</strong> amendment was approved on a voice vote<br />

ancladded to the Export-Import Reauthorization Bill.<br />

dRw*G~q -


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For R W<br />

P S S L p<br />

W , D.C. S EXON (D-NEB) r<br />

a I r T P R<br />

p<br />

l r E r<br />

P e i s o<br />

r s l i<br />

P l t N S<br />

● b s l m a R<br />

d a s t<br />

P p a p p<br />

s a t t a l<br />

B G ( c<br />

S C G ( j S<br />

c g i c l<br />

r<br />

i n o bills to increase the<br />

speed l i s s<br />

P R a c d<br />

p campaign and a similar proposal was adopted<br />

Republican National Convention that year.<br />

0<br />

-


S<br />

I t b<br />

m<br />

55 s l<br />

p<br />

a A r<br />

l<br />

a c I a<br />

s t m S<br />

C C D P<br />

s i t I<br />

r t f r f<br />

I r d p<br />

I a c i<br />

i w r t<br />

g<br />

S<br />

l<br />

H<br />

J<br />

U S S<br />

W D 2<br />


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

J“imE;on,.<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Wednesday, July<br />

: E C I C<br />

‘ S (<br />

c F E R C s<br />

a<br />

d “ n p<br />

a l c N S<br />

d<br />

strongest possible<br />

terms to reopen this proposal<br />

●<br />

gas<br />

f comment, suspend its implementation, and address the<br />

pricing i a m p r<br />

c c p a m c<br />

l l w E s<br />

s<br />

w l a f p<br />

c r a a a<br />

d p “ n<br />

‘ r r<br />

d s t b C<br />

s a t r p<br />

C r l a<br />

D c c w n<br />

i $ a $ t<br />

● ) of Nebraska. <strong>Exon</strong> said decontrol of ‘old” natural<br />

MORE


D<br />

w c s p i N<br />

c s c should<br />

make renegotiation of gas contracts carrying above market prices<br />

a priority instead of letting m c bigger<br />

p d “ n<br />

1 C e d d<br />

n S t t r e<br />

r p s o C<br />

r o d a d a<br />

f c r rule<br />

decontrolling old natural gas will almost certainly lead to court<br />

challenges and will encourage congressional action to prohibit<br />

implementation<br />

of the rule.<br />

Senators signing the <strong>Exon</strong> letter include: Tom Eagleton<br />

(D-MO), Mark Andrews (R-ND), N K (<br />

C ( R ( E Z ( ,<br />

S (D-ILL), H ( D (<br />

A ( L P ( C (<br />

A D (R-NY), Albert Gore (D-TENN), John Heinz (R-PA),<br />

Charles Grassley (R-IA), David Durenberger ( Don Riegle<br />

(D-MICH), Joe Biden (D-DEL),<br />

Ford. ( , G M<br />

D M (<br />

Sam Nunn ( C<br />

C M (<br />

B ( W<br />

( S (<br />

L ( (<br />

( (<br />

-


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

c’ J“im<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224.4224<br />

For Release, S July<br />

SENATORS REQUESTS FUNDS FOR MISSOURI RECREATION RIVER<br />

—..———.<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

rt~questing $200,000 for the maintenance of the Missouri<br />

National Recreation River project in northeast Nebraska.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> Army Corps of Engineers has cotlstructed streambank<br />

stabilization structures valued at $7.3 million along that<br />

portion of the Missouri River which comprises the Missouri<br />

National Recreation River ...Because maintenance of these<br />

structures is an on-going process, we request that the Committee<br />

● provicle $200,000 in Fiscal Year 1987 operations and maintenance<br />

funds,” the senators wrote<br />

Develc)pment Subcommittee.<br />

to the Senate Energy and Water<br />

<strong>The</strong> streambank stabilization structures have saved many<br />

acres of farmland which could have been lost or damaged by<br />

f s f n p<br />

i<br />

a<br />

M N R p a<br />

s M R e G<br />

N<br />

Y S D l S P<br />

-


<strong>News</strong><br />

For Release, Wednesday, July 30, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATORS URGE INCREASED FUNDS FOR PRAIRIE BEND PROJECT<br />

———<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY are<br />

urging approval of a $ P<br />

f<br />

s<br />

‘ a f ... e<br />

p p p a r t m<br />

Z a l S A E<br />

W D S<br />

● ) S r a $<br />

$ r B R<br />

f y e f would be used for more specific<br />

engineering studies which are necessary before an environmental impact<br />

statement can be<br />

issued.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Prairie Bend proposal is a multipurpose project aimed at<br />

meetir~g the needs of agriculture and wildlife P<br />

b c N s a<br />

f w a f a<br />

W S w fully involved in this work.”<br />

“<strong>The</strong>se funds are to be used for studies necessary<br />

to determine<br />

and melintain adequate instream flows including providing safe and<br />

reliable water supplies, protection of wildlife habitat, and<br />

o ) irrige~tion,” the senators said in the letter.


Nebraska<br />

“ Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, T<br />

— EXON P A F J N<br />

W14SHINGTON, D .C . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) T<br />

i l c a f j<br />

N<br />

a f j r b<br />

e h i c f N F<br />

D C s t c per judge, the<br />

Nebrasl


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

0’Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R S A<br />

A D P P<br />

—<br />

m<br />

W D.C . S W a<br />

S E ( s a t<br />

w<br />

p a d<br />

f<br />

a<br />

p<br />

a<br />

“ m t n a<br />

c i S a C<br />

R A p a a d<br />

d<br />

payments this f s<br />

l m G p<br />

w w t a b c a<br />

G A O ( O M<br />

B G a<br />

r<br />

l<br />

p<br />

o<br />

P r i n c<br />

t S C b c<br />

a g v s p<br />

S “ g d<br />

A a d p s<br />

as~,ist farmers with cash flow problems. N<br />

$2.3<br />

- -


Nebraska<br />

0’J“imE;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

FclrR(:lease,Saturday, August 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATE APPROVES EXON AMENDMENT TO MANDATE DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS<br />

—.,—,———— ————<br />

V7ASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Thursday adopted<br />

SENATOR JIM EXON’S (D-NEB) amendment mandating that advance<br />

de fic:~encypayments be made this fall for winter wheat under the<br />

Farm Elill.<br />

!lEar-ydeficiency payments ~villhelP manY farmers<br />

financially through these economically depressed times,’:<strong>Exon</strong><br />

said . <strong>The</strong> amendment was adopted on a 91 to 7 vote.<br />

‘l’heamendment mandates that 40 percent of the deficiency<br />

payments for wheat be paid this fall. Advance payments for feed<br />

grains; are mandated at 40 percent and 30 percent for cotton and<br />

rice. Deficiency payments are the difference between the<br />

commodity<br />

target price and the loan rate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Exon</strong> amendment was cosponsored by Senators Ed Zorinsky<br />

(D-NEB), Tom Harkin (D-IA), John Melcher (D-MT) Alan Dixon<br />

(D-ILL), Quentin Burdick (D-ND), and Gary Hart (D-COLO).<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1985 Farm Bill granted the Department of Agriculture<br />

authority to pay deficiency payments in advancef but did not<br />

mandate<br />

it.<br />

-


●’<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

J“im<strong>Exon</strong><br />

.<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For R


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

c Saturday, August 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />

———- EXON Bl\CKEDAMENDMENT TO HELP — SOIJTHERN DROUGHT APPROVED<br />

Wl\SHINGTON, D .C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Friday approved an<br />

amendm[>nt cosponsored by U.S. Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong> (D-NEB) to allow<br />

farmers contributing agricultural products to aid victims o,fa natural<br />

disast~>r a more equitable<br />

tax deduction.<br />

C!l.rrentlaw permits facrnersonly to deduct the actual cost of the<br />

product. <strong>The</strong> amendment WOU1:I change the law to allow farmers to<br />

deduct the wholesale market price of the agricultural product.<br />

●<br />

~I~venthough Midwest farmers are Eacing tough economic times they<br />

are donating hay to help their southern colleagues through a drought,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said. “Changing this law to permit a fair tax deduction will<br />

compensate farmers for their generosity,n he added.<br />

In order to quality for the more favorable deduction the donor<br />

must contribute the product within six-months from the time of the<br />

disaster. <strong>The</strong> recipient of the agricultural product must also certify<br />

that the contribution was made within the six-month period.<br />

According to recent reports more than 1,156 tons of hay from 39<br />

states have arrived in South Carolina as of last July 28. Fifty-two<br />

deaths have been attributed to the drought and rainfall is 50 percent<br />

below normal.<br />

measure was added by voice vote to the debt ceiling<br />

@<br />

legislation which will go to the House of Representatives following<br />

Senate approval.


!<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

For R/:lease~ Saturday, August 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXPORT ENHANCEMENT FOR SOVIETS “STEP IN RIGHT DIRECTION”<br />

——<br />

tYASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said Friday that<br />

the presidential decision to use provisions in the Farm Bill to<br />

enhance export sales of American grains<br />

to the Soviet Union was a<br />

step<br />

in the right direction.<br />

‘It’s obvious the administration was forced to act only<br />

after several farm state senators demanded<br />

in a recent senate<br />

o<br />

amendn~ent that the export subsidy provided in the Farm Bill be<br />

followed by the administration,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

!l’heSenate approved an amendment<br />

to the Export-Import<br />

Reauthorization Bill last month which called on the<br />

administration to extend the Export Enhancement Program to the<br />

Soviet.Union and China. <strong>Exon</strong> was a cosponsor of the amendment.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> cautioned<br />

that this will not solve the faulty<br />

administration policy of relying on exports to eliminate the<br />

depression in agriculture “but at least we were successful in<br />

getting their attention,” he said.<br />

-


● I R W A<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-2U.4224<br />

S<br />

S<br />

I D L R A Q<br />

P H O<br />

P T T<br />

●’<br />

H v o<br />

P<br />

c<br />

S<br />

N W G<br />

G A<br />

e<br />

c t p<br />

I c<br />

g<br />

I t<br />

l<br />

I s i l C<br />

B G T s o<br />

“ c my opinion. a<br />

I<br />

p<br />

c m S c o I<br />

c c I<br />

t s i a s<br />

d N e a r f e<br />

p R A t<br />

a<br />

-


Nebraska<br />

●) U.S. Senator<br />

—<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington,D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

I<br />

I<br />

For Release, F A<br />

C A EXON CHANGE TO HELP RURAL–AIRPORTS<br />

W S C C T<br />

a s p o S p<br />

K a c i t s<br />

T<br />

p a w r S<br />

g m s r<br />

e a a p i l<br />

i c f w A<br />

g would be limited to a maximum of 50 percent federal share<br />

of the cost of the liability insurance, not to exceed $50,000 per<br />

airport. <strong>Exon</strong> is the ranking Democrat on the Aviation Subcommittee.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposal was added as an amendment<br />

to the National<br />

Transportation Safety Board Reauthorization legislation. It was<br />

supported by the American Association of Airport Executives, National<br />

League of Cities, National Association of Counties and numerous state<br />

and lc)calgovernments.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposal would not include businesses operating within an<br />

airport, such as restaurants, news stands or parking lots. <strong>The</strong><br />

~<br />

airport would also need to demonstrate<br />

it has all the safety and<br />

security equipment required by the Federal Aviation Administration<br />

(FAA) before it could receive a grant.<br />

m <strong>Exon</strong> said many airports are in jeopardy of closing because of huge<br />

MORE


USS JJ EXON<br />

AVIATION SAFETY<br />

increases in liability insurance costs which they cannot a~to~d. <strong>The</strong><br />

insurance crisis is hitting small and medium sized public a<br />

h E K N a c<br />

p $ a l i p<br />

i l p l $ next year.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Committee also approved <strong>Exon</strong>’s amendment to shorten the length<br />

of the Blue Ribbon Presidential Commission study on aviation safety<br />

Crom one year to nine months. <strong>The</strong> shorter period would guarantee that<br />

the report is completed before the Senate Aviation Subcommittee<br />

completes reviewing the Aviation Trust Fund bill next<br />

<strong>The</strong> Commission study is to determine if the FAA is devoting<br />

adequate resources and funds to ensure aviation safety and whether the<br />

FAIIshould be reorganized as a separate agency. <strong>The</strong> FAA is currently<br />

a part of the Department<br />

OE Transportation.<br />

-<br />

COMMl~EE ON<br />

THEBUDGET<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20610-6100<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS


s<br />

J<br />

)<br />

For Release, M A<br />

. ...... M M—-—— CONSTRUCIIION APPROVED–FOR NEBRASKA —,.-—.—<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate has approved more than<br />

$26 rail.tionin military construction projects for Nebraska, U.S.<br />

SENATOR JIM EXON (1)-NEJ3)said S n<br />

E a s m S S<br />

C p a<br />

D A w S p a<br />

3 S n<br />

i $ m i O<br />

F B N be used<br />

to construct an additional electrical substation, modernize the<br />

Strategic Command Combat Center<br />

and also to improve overall<br />

security at the base.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill authorizes more than $1.6 million for the Nebraska<br />

National Guard. Projects include a $135,000 maintenance shop at<br />

Gering, $ f t 8 r H 3 $<br />

7<br />

o a s b L<br />

i L $ i f<br />

m<br />

N N G<br />

a<br />

d<br />

a a j c r<br />

b S H v<br />

-<br />

i


Nebraska .::,:.....,<br />

U.S. Senator .>“’”””<br />

Mxoni<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510 m<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R T A<br />

E P C A<br />

D<br />

S<br />

P T C<br />

E D P P C A<br />

S V W I R U<br />

A A C N D<br />

E<br />

P I F<br />

V<br />

● F M S C S G<br />

N C S C<br />

1 I O G D<br />

S “<br />

N L M L<br />

O “ T I<br />

L J O<br />

W M L “<br />

O M A A<br />

A O A G<br />

D R E A P<br />

H E H<br />

F T P S D<br />

* E F G H C<br />

S D R B F A A


m<br />

C<br />

WHY HAS THE PRESIDENT NOT EXERCISED THIS OPTION IF THE SITUATION<br />

IS AS BAD AS SOME ARE LED TO BELIEVE?”<br />

“BUT, MR. PRESIDENT, ALL OF THAT HAS BEEN ARGUED PREVIOUSLY. ”<br />

“A KEY REASON WE SHOULD NOT PROCEED IS THAT WE CAN’T AFFORD<br />

IT, OH YES, I HAVE HEARD THE LIMP EXCUSE THAT THIS $100 MILLION<br />

WIIJL NOT COST THE TAXPAYERS ANYTHING, OR INCREASE THE RUNAWAY<br />

ANNUAL DEFICIT OF $200 MILLION OR THE MUSHROOMING NATIONAL DEBT<br />

OF $2.3 TRILLION BECAUSE THIS LITTLE $100 MILLION IS SMALL<br />

POTATOES AS A PART OF THE WHOLE, AND ANYWAY<br />

THESE FUNDS ARE<br />

ALF:EADY APPROPRIATED AND ARE JUST LANGUISHING AROUND OVER AT THE<br />

PENITAGON WAITING TO BE SPENT. AS A MEMBER OF THE BUDGET AND<br />

AN[ED SERVICES COMMITTEES, RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF ~L OF THIS<br />

MADNESS, I FIND SUCH AN EXPLANATION THE MOST LUDICROUS OF ALL!”<br />

“THE BEST KEPT SECRET IN THE COUNTRY IS WHO ARE THE “BIG<br />

SPENDERS” IN WASHINGTON. EVERYONE KNOWS PRESIDENT REAGAN IS A<br />

“CONSERVATIVE. u HE SAYS SO AND HIS OBEDIENT SERVANTS FOLLOW HIM<br />

AND BASK IN HIS “OLD STYLE”, PAY AS YOU GO, Philosophy. IT’S A<br />

GIVEN. THE FACT THAT THE FACTS PROVE THE CONTWRY IS OF NO<br />

CONSEQUENCE. YOU GOTTA BELIEVE! “<br />

“ B G “<br />

C S ” M F C<br />

I P S<br />

G<br />

R<br />

M G “<br />

SPENDING AND VIEW THEIR VOTES ON THE $100<br />

-


<strong>News</strong><br />

. / Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

●<br />

L T A<br />

E S C A M P<br />

W S JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />

Senate Appropriations Committee approved legislation to allow<br />

completion of the North LOUP project and provide over $27 million<br />

in 198’7 a v w p N<br />

c<br />

w p i b E<br />

W A w a C<br />

p<br />

W<br />

e m c<br />

N p a<br />

a m n c p S<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> Z previously u S E N<br />

R S r N f<br />

n m A f n<br />

c s s e a p<br />

haclb<br />

c<br />

Committee d C E<br />

correct a w q p a<br />

F c p<br />

o<br />

a<br />

e P p<br />

a p a A C<br />

--MORE--<br />

p


USS JJ EXON<br />

\iAIf ER PROJECTS<br />

members Tuesday to ensu~e that the Pap io Creek correction would<br />

be<br />

included in the bill.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill designates $2 million for construction of the Papio<br />

Creek project near Omaha and $421,000 for operations and<br />

maintenance OC the watershed. Also included was $1 million in<br />

construction funding for the ,59mile Missouri National Recreation<br />

River project.<br />

FOC t>~]er~tionand maintenance the bill earmarks $1.05<br />

million for Harlan County Lake, $6,1 million for the Gavins Point<br />

Dam, $50,000 for the Missouri<br />

River, and $526~000 for the Salt<br />

{~~e[+’k all(lits tributaries.<br />

Studies receiving funding include $1.38 million for the<br />

O’Neill Alternative, $401,000 for the Prairie Bend feasibility<br />

study, and $145,000 for the Salt Creek and its tributaries.<br />

--30--<br />

COMMITTEEONARMEDSERVICES<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510-6050<br />

oFFICIALBUSINESS


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

0 Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

R F A<br />

E C W<br />

W D .C . S ( a<br />

l s s r c p t<br />

c p h f<br />

s p n r<br />

R a p a m c<br />

s C o e F<br />

f D A<br />

f a s W<br />

c f B<br />

p p A c<br />

o s s a<br />

END


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

Jim E


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R Thursday, August 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />

——— EXON : POLL RESULTS SHOW NEED FOR CHANGE IN FARM PROGRAM<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />

results of the wheat poll referendum “point to a call by farmers for<br />

a change in the Administrationr s current farm program.”<br />

“<strong>The</strong> 69 percent approval of production controls by Nebraska<br />

farmers<br />

indicates they are fed up with a farm bill which, by specific<br />

design, drives down commodity prices,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said that the Administration will try to discredit the<br />

● referendum results because they run contrary to the Presidentfs farm<br />

program. ‘<strong>The</strong>ir program is failing in three ways. It has increased<br />

taxpayers costs per year for agriculture from $11 billion in 1981 to<br />

an estimated $30 billion in <strong>1986</strong>, cut in half exports, and is driving<br />

family farmers off the land at a rate faster than any time in<br />

histor~y,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

‘Those of us who opposed the President’s concept from its<br />

inception will now have the farmers expressions to pressure the<br />

Adm~inist~ation to take corrective action and write a new bill as soon<br />

as possible,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Exc)nsaid the positive referendum results also indicate the need<br />

●<br />

agriculture<br />

for th~>Department of Agriculture to conduct a binding poll on all<br />

products. <strong>The</strong> poll results announced on Friday were<br />

nonbinding and involved wheat farmers only.<br />

- -<br />

f<br />

i


N<br />

.<br />

●<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

L<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For ReILease,Wednesay, August 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATE PASSES BILL CURTAILING COST OF FORMER PRESIDENTS<br />

—. —<br />

WA~;HINGTON, D.CO -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate has approved a measure<br />

cospon~;ored by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) limiting federal spending<br />

Eor former U.S. Presidents.<br />

Th(>legislation (S.1047) which curtails spending on former<br />

presid(>nts office allowances and secret service protection was<br />

unanimously approved Friday.<br />

“This legislation will take important steps in reclucing the<br />

unrestrained spending on our former presidents,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong><br />

spending for the former presidents now exceeds the $22 m a<br />

o i P o<br />

a F s f p “<br />

1<br />

g $ e m<br />

l would put a limit of $300,000 annually for office<br />

staff and allowances<br />

for each of the first four years after leaving<br />

office. In the fifth year after leaving office the annual amount<br />

declines to $250,’000 until the ninth year when it falls again to<br />

,..,.,<br />

$200,000 annually. Each March the former presidents must also submit<br />

a repo~t detailing<br />

how the funds were spent.<br />

‘This is a time of fiscal restraint<br />

-<br />

f


USS<br />

C SPENDING BY FORMER PRESIDENTS<br />

government, ” s r f<br />

p c t s C r<br />

s t f g r b<br />

d<br />

a<br />

s p f EunclsE~om<br />

p p i g p<br />

i p m w f p<br />

r i or o c<br />

legislation states a former president would have automatic<br />

around the clock Secret Service protection for five years instead of<br />

for life. <strong>The</strong> Secret Service w a a p<br />

f P s c s<br />

a c y<br />

--30--<br />

COMMITf’CEONARMEDOIRVICE$<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510-6060<br />

OFFICIALBUSINESS


I<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

,<strong>News</strong><br />

.Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Monday, August 18, <strong>1986</strong><br />

AIRPOFITGRANTS<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

were informed Monday that airport improvement grants totalling<br />

$90,900 have a N c<br />

F A A i s<br />

T a a a $<br />

p l r a i f a f<br />

r e M a a $<br />

9<br />

a i f a r e<br />

-


J“im<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Rc?1ease ~ Thursday, August 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—.— COMMONWEALTH .-.. .————— INCLUDED IN TAX REFORM CONFERENCE REpORT<br />

L1:EICOJ. N “ NEBR . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said the Tax Reform<br />

Bill :Ipprovedby the Joint Senate-House Conference includes a<br />

‘provision for Commonwealth<br />

Savings depositors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> provision would allow individual depositors at Lincoln’s<br />

insolt’entCommonwealth Savings to write off their lost deposits as<br />

tax dc:ductions. <strong>Exon</strong> fought to ensure this provision was included in<br />

the Senate version of the Tax Reform Bill.<br />

o<br />

“This new provision puts individuals and businesses on the same<br />

basis for claiming thei~ losses from the Commonwealth Savings<br />

colla~se,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Current law permits individuals to deduct only a maximum of<br />

$3,000 per year for their lost deposits while businesses can write<br />

off nearly all their loss in a single year.<br />

‘This measure provides some essential tax relief for Commonwealth<br />

depositors who are only now beginning to recover a portion of their<br />

deposits,M<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> benefit of this provision would vary depending on the amount<br />

of taxable income each depositor<br />

has to write off the loss.<br />

<strong>The</strong> final version of the Tax Reform Bill must now be approved by<br />

*<br />

both the House of Representatives and the Senate before being sent to<br />

,<br />

the President.<br />

--END--


.) Jim -<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Hxon,~<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Wednesday, August 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />

GRANT TO HELP STATE BUSINESSES GET DEFENSE CONTRACTS<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />

were informed today that the Nebraska Department of Economic<br />

Development has been selected to establish a technical assistance<br />

center to aid Nebraska businesses in competing for defense<br />

contracts.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Defense Logistics Agency under the Department of Defense<br />

awarded the Nebraska Department of Economic Development $46r222<br />

toward setting up the center. <strong>The</strong> federal funds will be matched<br />

with $82,000 in state funds.<br />

<strong>The</strong> funds will be used to establish a procurement outreach<br />

center at North Platte. <strong>The</strong> center will provide techincal<br />

assistance and military specifications and standards to Nebraska<br />

businesses to enable them to better compete for Defense<br />

Department contracts, according to the senators.<br />

--end--


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

MEDIA ADVISORY<br />

TUESDAY, AUGUST 26, <strong>1986</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

LINCOLN , NEBR . -- AT THE REQUEST OF U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND<br />

ED ZORINSKY THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE WILL HOLD A FIELD HEARING<br />

IN LIN”COLN TO REVIEW THE IMPACT OF THE FARM BILL ON NEBRASKA’S<br />

ECONON;Y.<br />

THE HEARING IS SCHEDULED FOR THURSDAY, AUGUST 28TH, AT 9 AT<br />

THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN, EAST CAMPUS UNION, IN THE GREAT<br />

PLAINS ROOM. SENATORS EXON AND ZORINSKY WILL BOTH BE IN ATTENDANCE AT<br />

THE HEARING.<br />

●<br />

NEBRASKA’S TWO U.S. SENATORS ARRANGED FOR THE HEARING AT THE<br />

URGING OF THE NEBRASKA LEGISLATURE AND FARM GROUPS.<br />

SCHEDULED TO TESTIFY ARE INDIVIDUAL FARMERS, REPRESENTATIVES FROM<br />

THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN, STATE OF NEBRASKA AND NEBRASKA<br />

LEGISLATURE. IN ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE SCHEDULED TO<br />

TESTIFY: NEBRASKA FARMERS UNION, NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU, AMERICAN<br />

AGRICULTURAL MOVEMENT, NEBRASKA WHEAT GROWERS, NEBRASKA CORN GROWERS,<br />

NE:BRASKA WIFE, NEBRASKA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, FARM CRISIS COMMITTEE,<br />

NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION, NEBRASKA GRANGE, NEBRASKA LIVESTOCK<br />

FEEDERS, NEBRASKA STOCK GROWERS, MID-AMERICA DAIRYMEN, NEBRASKA PORK<br />

PRODUCERS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FARMER-ELECTED COMMITTEEMEN,<br />

AGRICULTURAL COUNCIL OF NEBRASKA, NEBRASKA GRAIN SORGHUM ASSOCIATION,<br />

● GRAIN<br />

NEBRASKA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION, NEBRASKA COOPERATIVE COUNCIL, NEBRASKA<br />

AND FEED DEALERS, FARM CREDIT BANKS OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA GASOHOL<br />

COMMITTEE AND OTHERS.<br />

--END--


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R W S<br />

3 1<br />

. P H A<br />

W S<br />

I<br />

w i W N r<br />

m a f p h<br />

D H D i<br />

s O r $ a<br />

I<br />

acquire 25 public housing units. Alliance, Nebraska will receive<br />

I ●) $ a 6 a 5 u<br />

6<br />

Z


- Jlm M330<br />

Nebraska<br />

U S I m<br />

e<br />

Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

For Rc>lease, September 5, <strong>1986</strong><br />

To: CIIRIS AMES<br />

A1.COHOL UPDATE<br />

FROM : MARK BOWEN<br />

SENATOR JIM EXON ‘S OFFICE<br />

RE : STATEMENT BY SENATOR EXON TO ALCOHOL UPDATE<br />

01?USDA REPORT: FUEL ETHANOL & AG: AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- “Not only is the USDA’s Fuel Ethanol<br />

and Agriculture report is another slap in the face for America’s<br />

farme]:s, it’s based on faulty assumptions.”<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> ethanol market is good for the farm economy and the<br />

whole nation because it makes us less dependent on foreign oil.”<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> Department’s conclusion that it would be more economical<br />

to increase farm subsidies and discontinue ethanol programs runs<br />

contrary to what farmers want. America’s farmers don’t want more<br />

direct government subsidies - they want a fair price for their<br />

commodities. Ethanol production is one of the tools we should be<br />

using to help them get a better price. Ethanol represents a<br />

growing market for farm commodities and it makes no sense to<br />

undermine that market,” Senator <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

-


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

0’ Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Tuesday, September 9, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATORS HOLD PURSE STRINGS TO PREVENT CLOSING LINCOLN OFFICE<br />

——<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEBR) said the<br />

1987 Agriculture Appropriations Bill includes language to prevent<br />

th~~U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from moving the Lincoln<br />

Soil Conservation Service Technical Center to Fort Worth, Texas.<br />

Nebraska Senators Jim <strong>Exon</strong> and Ed Zorinsky and the senators<br />

from Oregon and Pennsylvania objected to the USDA effort to<br />

combine centers in the three states into one office located in<br />

Texas.<br />

o’<br />

<strong>The</strong> language included in the appropriations bill states that<br />

no funds shall be spent to consolidate equipment, personnel, or<br />

se]:vices of the Soil Conservation Service’s national technical<br />

centers in Portlandr Oregon; Lincoln, Nebraska; Chester,<br />

Pennsylvania; and Fort Worth, Texas into a single national<br />

technical center.<br />

‘This legislation was drafted because the USDA was giving<br />

primary attention to filling positions in Fort Worth, but not the<br />

other centers,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “After reports that the USDA was<br />

continuing its consolidation efforts through a back door approach<br />

we moved to block it by preventing any funding from being used<br />

for this purpose,” he added.<br />

Th,~reare currently more than 100 employees in the Lincoln<br />

office. <strong>Exon</strong> and the other senators have contended that it is<br />

mol:e effective to keep these regional offices located in the<br />

areas they serve rather than consolidate them at Texas.<br />

Th(~appropriations<br />

bill now awaits action by the full Senate.<br />

-<br />

nr86.100


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

FO1?RELEASE, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />

HOIJSE SUBCOMMITTEE APPROVES WILDERNESS BILL<br />

——<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C. --- <strong>The</strong> House Public Lands Subcommittee Thursday<br />

ap]?roved U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S legislation to p<br />

S C a N N F C<br />

s I C C S (<br />

b d force in the House of Representatives behind this<br />

legislation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> House subcommittee made only one minor change in the<br />

legislation which was to rename the Pine Ridge area a ‘national<br />

recreation area~ instead of it carrying the name “national wilderness<br />

area.” <strong>The</strong> 6,600 acre Pine Ridge Recreation Area and 8,100 acre<br />

Soldier Creek Wilderness Area would both have the same type of<br />

protections for the future. <strong>The</strong>y would also both have the same type<br />

of noxious weed, insect and fire control.<br />

Congressman Seiberling, House Subcommittee Chairman, cleared with<br />

Senator <strong>Exon</strong> the proposed name change the day before the subcommittee<br />

met. Seiberling wrote “This proposal may be worth considering as a<br />

means of expediting the bill as we near the end of this Congress with<br />

so much legislation awaiting action in a very limiting time.n He<br />

added~ “I would not advocate even this minor change to the<br />

Senate-passed bill without your consideration.”<br />

“<strong>The</strong> designation of a National Recreation area for Pine Ridge<br />

af:fords protection essentially identical to that of a Wilderness<br />

designation,v <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> full House Interior Committee is expected to approve the bill<br />

next week.<br />

-


a<br />

. ] Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Thursday, September 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />

DECISON OF NEBR. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ON SCENIC RIVER<br />

—.—<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- “I am pleased that the Nebraska Natural<br />

Resources Commission has recognized the need to protect the state<br />

trf2asUre Of the Niobrara River. <strong>The</strong> Commission has come a long<br />

way from its initial opposition and has completed the task we<br />

asked them to undertake last December by conducting its study and<br />

today endorsing its informative report on the Niobrara. That<br />

●<br />

ci]:culated<br />

report will knock down the many misconceptions which have been<br />

about this proposal,” <strong>Exon</strong> said Thursday regarding the<br />

Nebraska Natural Resources Commission action on the Scenic River<br />

Designation<br />

study.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> Commission’s call for local involvement in protecting<br />

th


I<br />

I<br />

Jim —— <strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

Fo:rRelease, Friday, September 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATE APPROVES AVIATION SAFETY STUDY<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate has approved<br />

legislation (S.2417) cosponsored by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON<br />

establishing a Blue Ribbon Commission to study ways to improve<br />

aviation safety.<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislation would create the Aviation Safety<br />

Commission, composed of seven members appointed by the President<br />

with the advice of Congress. <strong>The</strong> Commission would conduct an<br />

in--depthstudy of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and<br />

its responsibility to ensure aviation Safety.<br />

●<br />

ai]:craftmaintenance<br />

<strong>The</strong> FAA currently has the dual responsibility to promote<br />

commercial aviation and also ensure that it is safe. “We want<br />

to make sure that the enforcement of safety regulations and<br />

are not taking a back seat to the promotion<br />

of aviation by the FAA,V <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>Exon</strong> is the ranking<br />

Democratic member of the Senate Aviation Subcommittee.<br />

<strong>The</strong> study will examine whether the FAA has provided<br />

sufficient resources to ensure aviation safety and if the FAA<br />

should be reorganized. <strong>The</strong> Commission would also be directed to<br />

make recommendations of how to improve enforcement of FAA safety<br />

regulations.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> enormous number of serious aviation incidents<br />

demonstrates the need for this study,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. ‘<strong>The</strong> FAA has<br />

a responsibility to ensure that airline companies are not<br />

cutting corners on airplane maintenance schedules at the expense<br />

of safety requirements= It also must ensure that there are a<br />

sufficient number of FAA inspectors and air traffic controllers<br />

and that the agency is meeti~g its responsibility to develop an<br />

c a s f p s<br />

a<br />

-


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release , Fr iday, September 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />

— NE13RASKANS NOMINATIONS APPROVED<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON and ED ZORINSKY<br />

said Friday the U.S. Senate has approved the nominations of two<br />

Nebraskans.<br />

Janice L. Gradwohl, Lancaster County Judge, was approved by<br />

the U*S. Senate to serve on the Board of Directors of the State<br />

Justice Institute. She will serve a three year term on the<br />

board. <strong>The</strong> institute reviews the operation of state court<br />

sy:;tems.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Senate also approved the reappointment of Thomas A.<br />

O’Hara of Omaha for a four year term as U.S. Marshall in<br />

Nebraska.<br />

–-end--


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

I<br />

I<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Thursday, September 18, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON COAUTHORS PORK-BUSTER AMENDMENT TO CONTROL SPENDING<br />

.—— ..<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) will join<br />

Senator Dan Quayle (R-IND) in offering the “pork bustern amendment to<br />

allow I:hePresident to cut pork barrel spending from appropriations<br />

bills by improving the spending rescission process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> amendment would guarantee that Congress specifically vote on<br />

the Prc:sident’s spending rescission messages within ten days after the<br />

Presid[>nt signs an appropriations bill. Under current law, the<br />

Congress is not required to vote on a Presidential rescission<br />

request. If the Congress does not act within 45 days the rescission<br />

is voicland the money must be spent under current law. <strong>The</strong> Senators<br />

intend to offer the amendment to the Budget Reconciliation Bill.<br />

9<br />

“This amendment would put a stop to the unrestrained s~endinu on<br />

pork barrel projects that increase ~he federal budget defi~it,n ~xon<br />

said, who is a fiscally conservative member of the Senate Budget<br />

Committee.<br />

‘This pork buster amendment shines the light on spending<br />

provisions hidden in the dark cracks of appropriations bills much<br />

the lirle-item veto legislation would, and gives the President a<br />

guarantee the Congress will vote on his recommendations to cut<br />

unnecessary spending,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>Exon</strong> is a cosponsor of the<br />

legislation to give the President line-item veto authority.<br />

like<br />

<strong>The</strong> amendment improves the current rescission process and could<br />

“produc’esubstantial federal savings,w according to <strong>Exon</strong>. He noted<br />

that in the last two years the President has submitted more than 320<br />

rescissions, but none have been voted on by the Senate.<br />

President’s hands are tied in many appropriations bills<br />

because even though they may contain unnecessary pork barrel projects<br />

he cannot knockout individual items,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “This pork buster<br />

amendment would allow the President to prepare a rescission message<br />

specifying the items he objects to in a particular appropriations bill<br />

and be assured the that the Congress will vote up or down on those<br />

items,v he added.<br />

●<br />

unnecessary<br />

“<strong>The</strong> pork buster amendment will help eliminate pork barrel<br />

politics and make the Congress more responsible to stop this<br />

spending,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>The</strong> amendment has been endorsed by<br />

the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.<br />

-


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224.4224<br />

R W Septefier 17, <strong>1986</strong><br />

~ A I G<br />

W C . S Z<br />

i W a A N<br />

a a a $ g<br />

F A A i s<br />

t g w i d r<br />

a p a t A a<br />

F g A I P<br />

a w f p t a<br />

f a a O<br />

- -


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Thursday, September 18, 1<br />

EXON TO VOTE AGAINST- REHNQUIST -<br />

—<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. --- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said Wednesday<br />

prior to Senate action that he would vote against William H.<br />

Rehnquist for the position of Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme<br />

Court.<br />

q J R q<br />

i p j p<br />

s b r d Nor is there anything<br />

wrong with having a conservative or even a strong conservative as<br />

a chief justice,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“I will vote against elevating him to the position of Chief<br />

Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and top jurist of the American<br />

court system because I am concerned about his lack of full<br />

credibility, sometimes reliability and most all his seeming<br />

inability to be an effective consensus developer which is an<br />

important requirement to be chief justice,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“A chief justice should be chosen by near acclamation. I<br />

think the vote will indicate clearly that he will not be selected<br />

by acclamation because there are many who have serious objections<br />

about whether he is the best individual in the United States to<br />

be Chief Justice for the decades ahead,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“<strong>The</strong>re is nothing wrong with his service or his remaining on<br />

the Supreme Court, but I don’t think he is the best person to be<br />

moved up to this position,n <strong>Exon</strong> said. “I hope that if he is<br />

confirmed he grows in the position and becomes a great chief<br />

justice,” he added.<br />

--30--


Jim<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224.4224<br />

. R T S<br />

C U O<br />

W S ,<br />

i T a c<br />

Z<br />

a a m c Corp. of Engineers.<br />

s E C<br />

O a a $ c u c<br />

w p O F O C<br />

D 1<br />

-


Nebraska<br />

“ Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Saturday, September 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON s~,ysDEFICIT REDUCTION EFFORT IS PHONY<br />

————<br />

WA~jHINGTON, D .C ‘ U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEBR) F<br />

f “ G n b b<br />

d d B R<br />

c R r<br />

b d c G d t<br />

“phony, ridiculous<br />

and attempts<br />

to fool the public.”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> is a<br />

a<br />

)<br />

fiscally conservative member of the Senate Budget Committee.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> Reconciliation package is totally unrealistic. It is an<br />

abomination which only shifts money back and forth and in and out of<br />

the fiscal year. It only allows the deficit and national debt to<br />

grow, not shrink,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Exc)npointed out that Gramm-Rudman law promised to reduce the<br />

budget deficit to $144 billion in 1987, but the deficit will more<br />

likely be $170 billion<br />

next year.<br />

“Gramm-Rudman and the Reconciliation package are smoke and<br />

mirrors. <strong>The</strong> federal government is not and will not meet the deficit<br />

target levels this year, next year or even the year after,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“Gramm-Rudman is pushing the budget deficit the wrong way.<br />

Claiming that the Reconciliation Bill will reduce the deficit is a<br />

fraud c)nthe public. Continuing to make such false promises will turn<br />

●)<br />

the<br />

will of the people against its government,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“I have not and do not support the ruse called Gramm-Rudman. It<br />

MORE


USS EXON<br />

DEFICIT REDUCTION<br />

a d p a e<br />

e c g b d p<br />

s G f r<br />

p p b y r G a<br />

f s “ n u<br />

a b d f f a<br />

l i a<br />

f G m a f d<br />

r b l b e<br />

d “ l C must<br />

reality. <strong>The</strong>re are only two options. <strong>The</strong> Congress will have to<br />

either repeal the proven unworkable Gramm-Rudman law or massively<br />

increase taxes. In the meantime the deficit problem remains and the<br />

national debt steadily mushrooms,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

--30--<br />

NR86.109


Nebraska<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-42M<br />

Fo’rRelease, Saturday, September 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— QUAYLE -EXOIJPORKBUSTER — AMENDMENT<br />

WAS HINGrl’ON , D .C . --- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Friday evening, by 6 to 3<br />

bllockedthe “porkbuster” amendment offered by U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON<br />

(D-NEB) AND DAN QUAYLE (R-IND) which would have allowed the President<br />

to cut pork barrel spending from appropriations bills. <strong>The</strong> amendment<br />

was offered to the Budget Reconciliation Bill.<br />

‘Hiding special interest pork barrel spending in appropriations<br />

bills is an age old practice used because the money cannot be stopped<br />

by the President without vetoing the entire bill,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. ‘<strong>The</strong><br />

Quayle-<strong>Exon</strong> amendment would give the President the knife to cut pork<br />

barrel spending from an appropriations bill, much like the line item<br />

veto would workl” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

I<br />

Under current law the President may request Congress reduce<br />

spending for a particular program by preparing a ‘rescission m@ssag’@~”<br />

but Congress is not required to act on the request. Present law<br />

states if Congress does not act on a “rescission message” within 45<br />

days, the request is void and the money must be spent.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Quayle-<strong>Exon</strong> amendment would have guaranteed that Congress<br />

specifically vote on a spending ‘rescission message” within ten days<br />

after the President signs an appropriations bill containing the<br />

unwanted items.<br />

‘C!ongresshas been able to avoid the President’s rescission<br />

messages because Congress is not required to act on the requests to<br />

cut spending,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> porkbuster provision would have helped eliminate pork barrel<br />

politics. We must prevent unnecessary spending which only increases<br />

the ncltionaldebt,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> amendment was endorsed by the U.S. C<br />

National Farm Bureau Federation and the National<br />

of C<br />

Association of<br />

h<br />

Realtc)rs.<br />

-<br />

O<br />

N


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

0’ Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

, ,<br />

.1 Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

For Release, Monday, September 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—.— EXON CONSIDERS AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE INTERSTATE SPEED LIMIT<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C.. -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON is considering<br />

offering an amendment to allow states to increase the rural<br />

interstate<br />

speed limit to 65 mph.<br />

Earlier this year <strong>Exon</strong> introduced similar legislation to<br />

increase interstate speed limits. His initial proposal spurred<br />

efforts in Congress to give states the option to raise interstate<br />

speeds. <strong>The</strong> amendment would be offered to the <strong>1986</strong> Federal Aid<br />

Highway Bill.<br />

0’<br />

<strong>The</strong> potential amendment would permit states to raise the<br />

speed limit on rural interstates to a maximum of 65 mph without<br />

losing federal highway funds. <strong>The</strong> amendment would not change the<br />

mph speed limit on prima~y and secondary roads.<br />

“Now that the president is back on board for giving the<br />

states greater authority in setting the speed limits, I am<br />

confident we can change the currently ignored speed limit law.”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> state enforcement statistics clearly show that<br />

motorists are not obeying the 55 mph and that it is not being<br />

enforced,”<br />

he added.<br />

“It is obvious from the statistics and driving the<br />

interstates that the unofficial speed limit is between 65 and 70<br />

mph,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

●’ <strong>The</strong> Highway Bill is expected to be considered by the Senate<br />

before its scheduled adjournment on October 3rd.<br />

-


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224.4224<br />

For Rg~l~ase,Monday, September 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />

——. EXON [JNSNARLSWILDERNESS BILL<br />

1<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEF3)Monday<br />

un~rav~?leda snarl that developed between the House of<br />

Representatives and Senate over the modified <strong>Exon</strong> Wilderness<br />

Bill.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were threats circulating in the Senate Monday that the<br />

Wilderness Bill which was modified in the House of<br />

●<br />

occurred<br />

Representatives would be pigeonholed in the Senate. <strong>The</strong> threats<br />

because of the one line name change of the Pine Ridge<br />

desigfi,ationfrom a wilderness area to a recreation<br />

Mcnday <strong>Exon</strong> intervened and talked with both Senator Jim<br />

McClure (R-ID), chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural<br />

Resources Committee, and Representative John Seiberling (D-OH),<br />

chairman of the House Interior Committee, to resolve the problem.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> received assurances from McClure that the bill would not<br />

be delayed<br />

in the Senate due to the change.<br />

“Senator McClure’s assurances that the bill will not be<br />

delayed indicates that Nebraska can expect Senate approval of the<br />

Wilderness Bill before Congress adjourns in Octoberr” <strong>Exon</strong> Said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill designates<br />

the 6,600 acres of the Pine Ridge area as<br />

a national recreation area and the 8,100 acre Soldier Creek area<br />

● a national wilderness area. -


For Release, Tuesday, September 23, <strong>1986</strong><br />

——— MAKE AGRICULTURE EXPORTS TOP PRIORITY AT TRADE TALKS<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is urging the<br />

President to make agriculture trade a top priority in the current<br />

round of General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) negotiations.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> growing yearly trade deficit and the impending agricultural<br />

trade deficit strengthen the forces of protectionism. Unless<br />

significant progress is made toward opening markets to American<br />

products and toward free and fair competition in the world market,<br />

protectionism may become Americars new reality,” Senators <strong>Exon</strong> and<br />

Lawton Chiles (D-FLA) said in a letter to the President.<br />

●<br />

To<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> United States must become a tough negotiator with our trading<br />

partners,” they said. “While we have failed to open markets, other<br />

nations have enjoyed virtually unlimited access to American markets.<br />

maintain our competitive position we must threaten to limit access<br />

to American markets if foreign nations do not open theirs.”<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> last three months of trade deficits in agriculture underscore<br />

the critical need to reduce and reverse the debilitating trends that<br />

haflestifled our export markets over the past six years,” <strong>Exon</strong> and<br />

Chiles said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two pointed out that since 1980 agricultural exports have<br />

fallen by 40 percent. During the same period, imports increased by 20<br />

percent. “As a result, the U.S. trade surplus in agriculture has<br />

declined from $26.6 billion in 1980 to monthly deficits in <strong>1986</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se shocking figures highlight the worst U.S. agricultural trade<br />

performance in 14 years. Since the 1985 Farm Bill became law, the<br />

situation has worsened,~ the two senators said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> senators, both Senate Budget Committee members, said the GATT<br />

enforct:ment powers should be streamlined and strengthened. <strong>The</strong>y said<br />

under ~>xisting procedures an offending nation can stall GATT nearly<br />

indefinitely because of vague language. <strong>The</strong>y said independent experts<br />

could be used to arbitrate disputes between nations and recommended<br />

that specific and enforceable definitions of key phrases be added to<br />

clear up the current vague language.<br />

0 nr86.11.3<br />

--30--


Nebraska<br />

●’ Jim E;on <strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Thursday, September 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SEIVATEAPPROVES INCREASING RURAL INTERSTATE SPEED LIMITS<br />

——.——— ——<br />

WASHINGTON, D .C . -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Tuesday night<br />

overwhelmingly approved an amendment cosponsored by U.S. SENATOR JIM<br />

EX~3N (D-NEB) o i i<br />

m h a F<br />

H<br />

a<br />

“ s l r i a<br />

a s S c m<br />

t b r<br />

s a p a E l<br />

i A w s e C i<br />

r i s l<br />

a would give states the option to increase the speed<br />

limit on rural interstates to 65 mph. Rural interstates are those<br />

outside of towns with a 50,000 population or more.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> lead a successful effort to reject an amendment by U.S.<br />

Senator Chic Hecht (R-NEV) to include raising the federal limit to 65<br />

mph on all roads. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Democrat argued that raising the<br />

speed l~t on primary and secondary two lane only roads would impair<br />

safety.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> 55 mph limit on interstates is probably the most violated<br />

law in history,v <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Sixty-five on rural interstates is a<br />

mol:e reasonable speed limit, especially on the wide open stretches of<br />

the rnidwest and west,m he added.<br />

‘Interstate are among the safest roads in the nation. <strong>The</strong><br />

amf~ndment will restore the original intent of the interstate system<br />

which incorporates safety designs with reasonable higher speed<br />

l<br />

s<br />

a a F H a<br />

j c H R<br />

nr86.114<br />

-


3 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

I<br />

For Rt~lease, Thursday, September 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />

NEBRASKA PROJECTS IN TAX REFORM BILL<br />

—.—.<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Five Nebraska projects are included in<br />

the TzlxReform Bill transition rules according to U.S. Senators<br />

Jim ElConand Ed Zorinsky.<br />

●<br />

being<br />

bill includes three Lincoln and two Omaha projects. <strong>The</strong><br />

Lincoln projects include: (1) the ‘Waterpark” development at 29th<br />

& A Streets which is a former water and power plant being<br />

converted into a 41-unit condominium housing project; (2) the<br />

“H.P. B c N S a<br />

w b c into an office and retail complex; and<br />

(3) the “Stacy Fruit BuildingU at 8th & F Streets is a warehouse<br />

converted into office and retail space. <strong>The</strong> H.P.<br />

S F b l L H<br />

d<br />

Tt~eOmaha projects include the ‘McKesson-Robbins Project” at<br />

9th & Farnam Streets. It is a warehouse being converted into a<br />

135 unit housing project in downtown Omaha which is part of the<br />

Central Park Mall Development. <strong>The</strong> second project is the “City<br />

National Bank Buildingw at 16th & Harney Streets which is being<br />

colnve]:tedinto 130 residential housing units.<br />

‘(completion of these projects is important to’the economies<br />

of Lirlcoln and Omaha because they will provide additional<br />

housir~g, create jobs and expand the cities tax base,w the<br />

senators said:<br />

N


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

.<br />

m<br />

R T S<br />

C G I ~<br />

W , D .C . S Z<br />

a t a a $ c<br />

b c c C<br />

A P G I<br />

C<br />

c<br />

G<br />

I<br />

a<br />

A<br />

f e 4 c<br />

l k s c<br />

c “ s<br />

c c c<br />

s c i<br />

a f c e e c<br />

E P A o<br />

- -<br />

H<br />

N


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Saturday, September 27, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON W’OTESAGAINST T~X RE~ORM BILL ‘<br />

—————.<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB), a<br />

fiscally conservative member of the Senate Budget Committee,<br />

voted against the Tax Reform Bill saying it could reduce federal<br />

revenue and add to the budget deficit.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> main problem with this measure is that it will, in my<br />

●<br />

and<br />

best judgment, cause an overall net reduction in federal revenue<br />

thereby drive the country further towards the brink of<br />

economic disaster,” <strong>Exon</strong> said in a speech on the Senate floor<br />

prior<br />

to the vote.<br />

‘This tax reform bill very likely will tighten the noose<br />

around the throat of America’s economic viability in these times<br />

of skyrocketing budget deficits and an exploding national debt,”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nebraska senator said he made his decision to vote<br />

against the bill in the final hour before the Tax Reform Bill<br />

was voted on by the Senate.<br />

-<br />

NR86.117<br />

a


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

3 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Monday, September 29, <strong>1986</strong><br />

LOAN AUTHORITY FOR HOUSING UNITS IN NEBRASKA<br />

—.———<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND<br />

ED ZORINSKY<br />

were informed Monday afternoon that Nebraska will receive more<br />

thzin$2 million in loan authority to construct housing units for<br />

th{~mentally<br />

ill and the disabled.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Department of Housing and Urban Development notified the<br />

senators that Mercy Housing Inc. of Omaha will receive $490,200<br />

to construct 16 units for the chronically mentally ill. Central<br />

a<br />

Nebraska Goodwill Industries of Grand Island will receive<br />

$1,199,000 for 37 units for the same purpose.<br />

Th,2Great plains Chapter of Paralyzed Veterans in Omaha will<br />

rec:eive $676,800 to construct 16 units in Omaha specifically for<br />

the handicapped.<br />

--30--<br />

nr86.lL8


Nebraska<br />

“ Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Re:.ease, Tuesday, September 30, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATORS WIN AGREEMENT ON HYDROELECTRIC RELICENSING<br />

——-—<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY have<br />

been successful in protecting Nebraska’s water, environmental and<br />

power ~.nterests in legislation covering the relicensing of<br />

hydroelectric power plants.<br />

Exc>nand Zorinsky personally met with Representative John Dingell<br />

(D-Mich) Tuesday and hammered out the final agreement clarifying the<br />

language in the bill to protect Nebraska. Dingell, chairman of the<br />

House Ilnergyand Commerce Committee, is the leader of the House<br />

conferc)es who had previously resisted clarifying the bill language.<br />

Nebraska’s two senators have been working for the past month to<br />

clarif>~ the House language which had been tentatively agreed to by the<br />

House-Senate Conference on the hydroelectric relicensing legislation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ho~lse language could have adversely affected Nebraska irrigators<br />

and electric ratepayers.<br />

<strong>The</strong>!Nebraska senators were concerned that the existing conference<br />

language would have required the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission<br />

(FERC) during the relicensing process to accept the recommendations of<br />

fish aridwildlife agencies regardless of the consequences for<br />

hydroelectric power or irrigation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> senators were able to convince the joint conference to clarify<br />

the cor~ference report language to ensure that during relicensing equal<br />

consideration be given to fish and wildlife, irrigation and electric<br />

power generation concerns. This would provide a balanced approach and<br />

prevent any one concern from being able to dictate license<br />

restrictions during the relicensing process.<br />

“Fish and wildlife concerns are important, but equally important<br />

is the continuing ability to provide power and irrigation for farm<br />

land,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Our successful effort ensures that all of the<br />

considerations will be taken into account in a balanced equitable<br />

manner when hydroelectric power plant licenses come up for renewal,”<br />

he added.<br />

Zorinsky said that the agreement worked out with the conferees<br />

protects Nebraska irrigators, recreation interests and<br />

conservationists as well as the power projects. “Under this agreement<br />

everybcdies interests will be addressed, with equal consideration<br />

MORE


EXON/ZORINSKY<br />

HYDROELECTRIC<br />

RELICENSING<br />

being given to fish and wildlife, irrigation and electric power ●<br />

generation,~ he said. Zorinsky, who earlier said he would filibuster<br />

the bill unless Nebraska’s interests were protected, indicated he will<br />

now withdraw his objections.<br />

<strong>The</strong> joint conference agreement is now expected to be approved by<br />

the full Senate and the House of Representatives. It will then be<br />

sent to the President for his approval.<br />

-


f<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

C M Bowen<br />

Telephone: 202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Wednesday, October 1, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON RETURNS UNUSED OFFICE FUNDS TO SENATE FOR EIGHTH YEAR<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON will return more<br />

than $140,000 in unused <strong>1986</strong> office funds to the U.S. Senate.<br />

In those eight years <strong>Exon</strong> has returned more ‘than $2.1<br />

million in unused funds to the U.S. Senate. This is the eighth<br />

consecutive year in a row that <strong>Exon</strong> has turned money back to the<br />

U.S. Senate.<br />

I?OK<strong>1986</strong>, the well-known fiscal conservative will return<br />

●’<br />

$117,616.09<br />

in unused office salary allotment. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska<br />

senators were allotted $910,878.00 for office salaries in <strong>1986</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> $910,878.00 amount was reduced $39,168.00 to $871,710.00 as<br />

rec~uiredby the Gramm-Rudman<br />

law.<br />

So far in the <strong>1986</strong> calendar year <strong>Exon</strong> has spent only<br />

$16,799.03 of the $54,194.00 amount he is allotted for office<br />

expenses.<br />

“I’ve always run my offices on a tight budget. My office is<br />

small ~ut very efficient, just like government should be. It<br />

follows my philosophy that government should be fiscally<br />

conservative and not waste the taxpayers money,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

-<br />

a 1<br />

NR86.120


330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

C M B<br />

T 2<br />

For Release, Thursday, October 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON URGES QUICK APPROVAL OF TEXAS AIR PURCHASE OF FRONTIER<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has<br />

cosigned a letter with U.S. Senator Alan Simpson (R-WYO) and<br />

others urging the Secretary of Transportation Elizabeth Dole to<br />

expedite consideration of the Texas Air acquisitions of Frontier<br />

and People Express Airlines.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> is the ranking Democratic member of the Senate Aviation<br />

Subcommittee. <strong>Exon</strong> said approval of the acquisitions by October<br />

16th could restart Frontier with its 4,700 employees and avoid a<br />

total shut down of People Express and its 5,200 employees.<br />

Frontier employees have been laid off since August 24th, <strong>1986</strong>.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> direct livelihoods of many thousands of Frontier<br />

people Express employees and our other constituents who<br />

and<br />

indirectly depend upon the business and service generated by<br />

thase carriers are in very real jeopardy,” the senators said in<br />

the letter.<br />

“Quick approval of the Texas Air proposals will allow Texas<br />

Air’s subsidiary, Continental Airlines, to immediately reemploy<br />

Frontier’s employees and restart air service out of the Denver<br />

hub to Nebraska and other states,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

‘Clearly, the public interest in preserving employment, air<br />

service options and competition compels our request for expedited<br />

consideration of the proposed purchase. Faced with one carrier<br />

already struggling in bankruptcy and one teetering at the edge of<br />

survival, we do urge you to move quickly,n the senators told the<br />

Secretary of Transportation. ,,<br />

nr86.121<br />

-


●<br />

For Release, Thursday, October 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON SUPPORTS OVERRIDE OF SOUTH AFRICA SANCTIONS VETO<br />

——<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

C M B<br />

T 2<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) voted<br />

with the majority to override the President’s veto of the South<br />

Africa sanctions bill despite threats that South Africa may ban<br />

American grains. <strong>The</strong> veto was overridden by a vote of 78 to 21.<br />

“I was pleased with the strong vote. It was interesting<br />

that all of the farm senators, with the exception of South<br />

Dakota Senator Pressler, supported the override in the face of<br />

the threat of embargos that was issued last night by Mr. “Pik”<br />

Botha, Foreign Minister of South Africa, when he called the<br />

Republican cloakroom to lobby senators,U <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> reality is that 1985 grain exports to South Africa were<br />

less than one-half of one percent of the United States’ total<br />

grain exports,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> effect of the Gramm-Rudman law<br />

t will cause far more harm to American agriculture than this small<br />

arnountf” he added.<br />

“Conditions in South Africa have not improved. Oppression<br />

and the violation of civil rights continues in South Africa and<br />

its time the United States did more than simply stand on the<br />

sidelines,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“Maybe now we will convince that Apartheid government in<br />

South Africa that the United States means business, not<br />

withstanding the objections of the President of the United<br />

States,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

nr86.122<br />

-<br />

.,.


●<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bow’en<br />

Telephone: 202-224-42U<br />

For Release, Saturday, October 4, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON AMENDMENTS TO CONTINUING RESOLUTION APPROVED<br />

——<br />

V7ASHINGTON, D.C. -- After scolding the Senate in a speech late<br />

Thursday night for its arcane procedures the U.S. Senate approved two<br />

of SE;NATOR JIM EXON’S amendments to the Continuing Resolution.<br />

E;xonwon approval of an amendment which would conform the papio<br />

Creek. flood control project to a revised plan which would reduce the<br />

cost from $120 million to $7 million. <strong>The</strong> cost reduction is possible<br />

becatlse local residents and state officials have endorsed a<br />

scaled-back version of the original project. <strong>The</strong> scaled-back plan<br />

will use channel improvements and electronic flood monitoring system<br />

instead of costly and controversial dams for flood control. - -<br />

“Not w t<br />

million,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “In every way this is a common sense<br />

approach,” he added. Senators <strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky have long sought<br />

these necessary changes in the law.<br />

A second amendment approved will resolve a water quality problem<br />

at Dam Site #18 of the Papio Creek project. Effluent from two<br />

upstream Sanitary Improvement Districts is preventing the dam from<br />

being filled because containment of the effluent in the dam could<br />

cause health problems. Early last year the Omaha-Douglas County Board<br />

of Health recommended a t r a<br />

c b r<br />

f<br />

u<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Exon</strong> amendment inserts into law a solution to the problem<br />

wl~ichhas been agreed to by state and local parties. <strong>The</strong> provision<br />

calls for construction of a storage lagoon separate from Dam Site #18<br />

where the effluent would be diverted and contained.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said “it makes no sense to have the Dam Site #18 project sit<br />

idle when this solution is available.” <strong>The</strong> change will not require<br />

any increase in the 1987 Energy and Water Appropriation. Previous<br />

funding and those available to the Corps of Engineers in 1987 should<br />

provide sufficient funds to complete the project.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Senate statutory provisions now go to a House-Senate<br />

conference for expected final approval.<br />

n<br />

-


5


●<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

—— .Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

3<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510 Telephone: 202-224-4224<br />

For F!elease, Ṣaturday, October 4, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATE APPROVES EXON WILDERNESS BILL<br />

———<br />

W , D S S wilderness<br />

designation bill (S.816) passed the Senate unanimously Friday<br />

night.<br />

<strong>The</strong> measure introduced by <strong>Exon</strong> which cleared the U.S. Senate<br />

was reported back to that body after its successful House<br />

c,~nsideration. <strong>The</strong> legislation designates more than 14,000<br />

acres of the Nebraska National Fo”rest as “wilderness~ and<br />

“recreation” areas.<br />

o<br />

F<br />

●<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislation designates the 6,600 acre, Pine Ridge<br />

location as a National Recreation Area and the 8,100 acre,<br />

Soldier Creek site a National Wilderness Area. Both sites are<br />

currently being managed as wilderness areas by the National<br />

S<br />

“ a w p<br />

g c s l<br />

R R c m<br />

p<br />

g S W A<br />

a<br />

r w c<br />

s g f i n<br />

would be controlled to prevent spreading to adjacent farm and<br />

ranch land. It also continues current cattle grazing<br />

practices. Hunting, fishing and trapping rights are protected<br />

for both areas.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> Pine Ridge Recreation Area will be managed in a manner<br />

similz~r to the Soldier Creek Wilderness area with the<br />

continuation of existing primitive and semi-primitive<br />

recre:~tional use,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill, which was cosponsored by Senator Zorinsky, now<br />

goes to the President who is expected to sign it into law.<br />

n<br />

- -<br />

r


Jim<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

For Rc!lease, Thursday, October 9, <strong>1986</strong><br />

.— EXON ODOMETER FRAUD LEGISLATION GOES TO PRESIDENT<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224.4224<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Another one of U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S (D-NEB)<br />

bills passed the Congress Wednesday night. <strong>The</strong> legislation (S.475) to<br />

crackdown on odometer fraud on used cars and trucks now goes to the<br />

Presiclent for his signature.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Senate gave final approval to the bill on Wednesday night.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hc~useof Representatives passed the bill earlier in the week.<br />

●<br />

“E!ollingback odometers is one of the biggest frauds committed<br />

against consumers each year,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Odometer fraud illegally<br />

adds an average of $750 to the cost of a used car that has been<br />

tamper’edwith,” he added. <strong>The</strong> National Highway Traffic Safety<br />

Administration estimates that odometer fraud costs consumers in excess<br />

of $2 billion annually.<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislation would strengthen present law by establishing a<br />

tracez~ble record of vehicle mileage readings. <strong>The</strong> mileage readings<br />

would be recorded on vehicle ownership titles at the time of a sale.<br />

In addition auto leasing companies which lease vehicles on long–term<br />

contrz,cts will be required to disclose the mileage when the vehicles<br />

are sc~ld. Auction companies will be required to maintain mileage<br />

records on the used vehicles they sell. It prohibits vehicles from<br />

being registered in any state unless the mileage can be verified.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill increases the maximum fine for odometer fraud from $1,000<br />

to $2,000 per violation and the criminal penalty from one to three<br />

years in prison.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said odometer fraud is a difficult crime to detect, but this<br />

legislation will establish steps to help identify odometer fraud. It<br />

is estimated that about three million odometers are tampered with each<br />

year; with odometers being rolled back an average of 30,000 miles per<br />

vehicle. Odometer fraud typically occurs on high mileage, late model<br />

used cars.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said the bill, suggested by the Nebraska New Car and Truck<br />

Dealers Association, will be a significant deterrent in preventing the<br />

interstate laundering of ownership titles and odometer tampering.<br />

Previously law enforcement officials have been handicapped by<br />

insufficient record keeping.<br />

● <strong>The</strong> ExOn bill was cosponsored by Senator Zorinsky and five other<br />

senators.<br />

~~’a~. \2b<br />

END


Nebraska<br />

0’Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-42M<br />

For Release, Friday, October 10, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON PROVIS —.. ION INCLUDED IN 1987 D A I ION BILL<br />

WASHINGTON , D .C . U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S (D-NEB) proposal<br />

to allow the National Guard and the Reserves to visit military<br />

commissaries a maximum of 14 times per year was approved by the<br />

joint Senate-House Conference on the 1987 Defense Authorization<br />

Bill in a late night session Thursday.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> introduced the legislation (S.2344) to allow the<br />

National Guard and Reserves to visit commissaries up to 14 times<br />

l e m r e<br />

p E l a<br />

S v D A<br />

p p m N<br />

R v a m c<br />

a s p a m<br />

a v C rules permit members of the National<br />

Guard and Reserves to visit the commissaries only during their<br />

da:{ tour of active duty training.<br />

‘!Fheexisting rule is not much of a benefit given that these<br />

individuals are often away from home,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “In<br />

recognition of the growing importance of the Guard and’Reserves<br />

withi]~ the Total Force Concept, Reservists and the Guard members<br />

will have greater access to an important benefit,” he added.<br />

‘!Phischange in the commissary rules will lead to greater<br />

retention of trained and experienced personnel who are the most<br />

expensive to replace. More importantly, it makes the Total<br />

Force C an expression,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

E~:onpointed out in his successful argument to the<br />

Senat6>-House Conference Committee that under current national<br />

defense plans the National Guard and Reserve units would<br />

comprise about p m<br />

h<br />

o<br />

F e p r c<br />

f C p<br />

A<br />

o<br />

NR.86.127<br />

END


Nebraska<br />

●’ Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

For Re21ease, Saturday, October 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON l~ROTESTS TAX BENEFIT FOR TEXAS AND LOUISIANA<br />

I<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

UNIVERSITIES<br />

Wl\SHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said he will offer an<br />

arrLendmen to eliminate a “grossly unfair” loophole in the Tax Reform<br />

Bill that benefits Texas University and Louisiana State University and<br />

penalizes the University of Nebraska and all other schools. <strong>The</strong><br />

loophole allows a special tax break for persons making charitable<br />

contributions to Texas University or Louisiana State University.<br />

a letter to Senator Bob Packwood (R-ORE), Chairman of the<br />

Senate Finance Committee, <strong>Exon</strong> protested the ‘grossly unfair provision<br />

of th(:Tax Reform Act” and said it “must be corrected.” <strong>The</strong> special<br />

loophole could be eliminated as part of the Tax Reform Technical<br />

Corrections bill which is pending before the Senate.<br />

●)<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said he will offer an amendment to an appropriate bill to<br />

make treatment equal for all schools unless the special loophole<br />

for Texas University and Louisiana State is either repealed or<br />

expan(ied to all schools.<br />

Contributors to either Texas University or Louisiana State<br />

Ur]ive.rsitycould receive some special benefit~ such as the right to<br />

purchase tickets to sporting events, in addition to receiving a full<br />

charitable tax deduction. No other schools in the nation could offer<br />

such Isenefits to contributors. Contributors to any other schools who<br />

receive any special benefit as a result of a contribution would not be<br />

able to take a charitable tax deduction.<br />

NR86.128<br />

(1’ETTER ON REVERSE SIDE)<br />

END


J. JAMES EXON<br />

N<br />

3 S H B<br />

W<br />

2<br />

A<br />

C<br />

C<br />

ARMEDS<br />

S<br />

T<br />

B<br />

2 F B<br />

L<br />

6<br />

S F B U<br />

O 1<br />

2 F BUtWING<br />

N P t<br />

WASHINGTON, DC 20510<br />

O<br />

I<br />

<strong>The</strong> Honorable Bob Packwood<br />

Chairman, Committee Finance<br />

United States Senate<br />

Washington, D. C. 20510<br />

Dear<br />

Bob:<br />

I writing about a g unfair provi.si,onof the Tax<br />

Reform Act of <strong>1986</strong> which must be corrected. I referring<br />

s 1608 of the bill, regarding the treatment of charitable<br />

contributions certain institutions of higher learning.<br />

As I u p s<br />

t p c<br />

s c U L<br />

S U A p c<br />

i<br />

w r a c d<br />

r s c r<br />

s r p s a<br />

s t i s b<br />

a o c u n<br />

grossly u<br />

\<br />

On behalf of the University of Nebraska and colleges and<br />

universities a nation, it is imperative that the Senate<br />

address this i technical corrections bill pending<br />

before the Senate o i the reconciliation conference.<br />

s break for universities must be repealed,<br />

provision should be expanded offer the treatment<br />

institutions of higher<br />

reconciliation bill<br />

learning. If this cannot<br />

technical corrections<br />

be done<br />

bill, I<br />

offer amendment accomplish this other appropriate<br />

vehicle.<br />

I f w c<br />

i r b<br />

a<br />

n<br />

S<br />

S


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

●Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

Telephone:202-224-42U<br />

FOK Release , Saturday, October 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON PROVIS ION HELPING SMALLER AIRPORTS<br />

IS APPROVED<br />

W , D S late F f<br />

unanimous approval to a provision offered by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON to<br />

help s]naller airports locate r p l i<br />

p t p c<br />

<strong>The</strong> provision was included in the National Transportation Safety<br />

Board ,4uthorization Bill (HR4961). <strong>Exon</strong> is the ranking Democratic<br />

member of the Senate Aviation Subcommittee.<br />

<strong>The</strong> provision will c a n c p<br />

i i a i i<br />

a i p l c l<br />

●’<br />

‘This s d n s m<br />

a w s c<br />

e<br />

i m l<br />

i p c s a a<br />

<strong>The</strong> provision is a compromise from <strong>Exon</strong>’s original proposal which<br />

the Senate Commerce ~ommittee approved, but blocked by the House<br />

of Representatives. During discussions with the House, <strong>Exon</strong> fought<br />

for his o p w w r S<br />

T<br />

a g $50,000 to e r<br />

s a p i<br />

l i f would have come from the Aviation<br />

Trust l~und.<br />

v<br />

Th~~ExOn provision was endorsed by the American Association of<br />

Airport Executives, National League of Cities, National Association of<br />

Counties and numerous state and local governments.<br />

<strong>The</strong> compromise provision would require the Secretary of<br />

Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration to conduct a<br />

study I:oa effect the rapidly increasing i p<br />

h p a i r<br />

f s l<br />

Th6:National Transportation Safety Board Authorization Bill now<br />

goes back to the House of Representatives for final approval before<br />

being :;entto the president.<br />

0’ END<br />

nr86.12!9


J<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

I ‘F<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington,D.C. 20510 b<br />

r<br />

I<br />

. I Contact:MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Thursday, October 16, <strong>1986</strong><br />

SENATE OK’S COMMONWEALTH & PHYSICIANS MUTUAL TRANSITION RULES<br />

W S and ED ZORINSKY said<br />

the Technical Corrections to the Tax Reform Bill approved by the<br />

Senate Thursday includes transition rules for Commonwealth Savings<br />

depositors and the Physicians Mutual Insurance Company of Omaha and<br />

eliminates a special benefit for two southern university athletic<br />

programs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Technical Corrections Bill gives Commonwealth depositors a<br />

second option to write-off their losses from the failed financial<br />

institution. <strong>The</strong> Technical Corrections Bill will permit depositors to<br />

take a one time deduction of up to $20,000 on their lost deposits<br />

without filing an itemized tax return. <strong>The</strong> Tax Reform Act permits<br />

depositors the other option which is to deduct a percentage of their<br />

loss each year on an itemized tax return over an extended period of<br />

● years.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two options will give large and small Commonwealth depositors<br />

the best possible choices in writing-off their losses. <strong>The</strong> one time<br />

$20,000 maximum deduction will benefit many smaller depositors who may<br />

not file itemized tax returns, while larger depositors will benefit by<br />

claiming their losses using the itemized tax return option.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill also eliminates a federal tax on Physicians Mutual<br />

Insurance Company of Omaha. Under current law, a subsidiary of<br />

Physicians Mutual has been subject to a federal tax that is not<br />

imposed on any other similar company. <strong>The</strong> technical corrections bill<br />

eliminates the tax and places Physicians Mutual on the same basis as<br />

its competitors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill knocks out a special tax benefit for Texas University and<br />

Louisiana State University (LSU) that was included in the Tax Reform<br />

Bill. <strong>The</strong> special benefit exempted Texas University and LSU from an<br />

Internal Revenue Service ruling denying tax deductions for<br />

contributions to college athletic programs if a benefit such as<br />

football tickets are received as a condition for the contributions.<br />

No other universities in the nation would have been permitted to offer<br />

special benefits to contributors to their athletic programs.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky said last week they would work to eliminate the<br />

loophole saying it was unfair to grant a special tax break only to<br />

these two universities’ athletic programs.<br />

Tk,emeasure now goes back to the House of Representatives before<br />

being sent to the President.<br />

nr86.130<br />

END


Nebraska<br />

U.S. senator<br />

●’ Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />

,<strong>News</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For ReILease, Saturday, October 18, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— SENATE GIVES FINAL APPROVAL TO $65 MILLION FOR OGALLALA AQUIFER<br />

WASHINGTON, SENATORS JIM EXON ED ZORINSKY<br />

praised Senate final passage late Friday night of the Omnibus Water<br />

Resour


Nebraska<br />

“ J“imE;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Release, Wednesday, October 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />

.—. PRESIDENT SIGNS —— EXON WILDERNESS BILL ——<br />

W D.C. --- P R M s<br />

U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S wilderness designation bill for<br />

two important areas in western Nebraska,<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislation designates<br />

the 6,600 acre, pine Ridge<br />

location as a National Recreation Area and the 8,100 acre,<br />

Soldier Creek site a National Wilderness Area. Both sites are<br />

● managed<br />

locat(:d in the Nebraska National Forest and are currently being<br />

as wilderness areas by the National Forest Service.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> President’s approval ensures that these two beautiful<br />

areas will be protected for generations to come,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

Bc)thareas contain safeguards guaranteeing that fire,<br />

insect:sand noxious weeds w c p<br />

sprea6!ing to adjacent farm and ranch land. It also continues<br />

current cattle grazing practices. Hunting, fishing and trapping<br />

rights are protected<br />

for both areas.<br />

-<br />

nr86.132


Nebraska<br />

●’ Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 2~510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Re1ease, Wednesday, Octo’ber 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON PLEASED WITH POPULARITY OF GOLD COINS CREATED BY HIS BILL<br />

——— ——<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB), whose<br />

legislation created the first regular issue American gold coins in<br />

more than 50 years, said he is “tremendously pleased” with the<br />

domestic and international popularity the coins are having in their<br />

first week on sale.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> stressed that the coins will be an important factor in<br />

helping to decrease the U.S. trade deficit and reduce the national<br />

debt which have both hit record highs this year.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> emphasized that one very important aspect of the gold coin<br />

law is that profits from the sale of the American gold coins must be<br />

used to reduce the $2.3 trillion national debt. “This mandate<br />

specifically prevents gold coin profits from being used to further<br />

expand federal spending,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

“It is quite obvious from the overwhelming popularity shown in the<br />

first day that the public wants the option of investing in American<br />

gold coins,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> gold coins were offered for sale for the first time Monday and<br />

according to reports are being highly sought after. Mint<br />

officials indicated that first day sales were strong. <strong>The</strong> U.S. Mint<br />

sold in excess of 320,000 ounces of gold coins on the first day.<br />

In accordance with the <strong>Exon</strong> legislation, the gold coins are<br />

available in four different sizes. <strong>The</strong> sizes are a one ounce,<br />

on(=-half o one-quarter ounce and one-tenth ounce. <strong>The</strong> coins<br />

feature a family of American Eagles on one side and Miss Liberty on<br />

the other.<br />

NR86.133<br />

END


Nebraska<br />

●’ Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For ReLease, Wednesday, October 29, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— PRESID!ZNT SIGNS EXON ODOMETER FRAUD BILL<br />

LIINCOLN, NEBR. -- President Reagan has signed into law U.S.<br />

SENATOR JIM EXONIS (D-NEB) legislation (S.475) to crackdown on<br />

odometer fraud on used cars and trucks.<br />

This is the second bill this month that the President has signed<br />

into li~wwhich was sponsored by <strong>Exon</strong>. Last week the President signed<br />

into law <strong>Exon</strong>’s Nebraska Wilderness Designation Bill.<br />

<strong>The</strong> National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that<br />

odometer fraud costs consumers in excess of $2 billion annually.<br />

Odometf:r fraud illegally adds an average of $750 to the cost of a used<br />

car that has been tampered with.<br />

e<br />

Thf:legislation strengthens present law by establishing a<br />

traceable record of vehicle mileage readings. Previously law<br />

enforcc:ment officials have been handicapped by insufficient record<br />

keeping. <strong>The</strong> new law will take effect in 18 months.<br />

Unc~er the new law mileage readings will be required to be recorded<br />

on ownrship titles at the time a vehicle is sold. Auto auction<br />

houses will be required to maintain mileage records on the used<br />

vehiclf>s they sell. Vehicles will be prohibited from being registered<br />

in any state unless the mileage can be verified.<br />

Th~:bill increases the maximum fine for odometer fraud from $1,000<br />

to $2,000 per violation and the criminal penalty from one to three<br />

years in prison.<br />

Odometer fraud is a difficult crime to detect, but this law will<br />

establish steps to help law enforcement officials detect odometer<br />

fraud. It is-estimate~ that every year about three million used cars<br />

and trucks have their odometers rolled back an average of 30,000 miles<br />

per vehicle. Odometer fraud typically occurs on high mileage, late<br />

model used cars.<br />

o<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said this new law, originally suggested by the Nebraska New<br />

Car anclTruck Dealers Association, will significantly deter the<br />

interstate laundering of ownership titles and odometer tampering.<br />

n<br />

END


<strong>News</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

C M B<br />

T 2<br />

For Release Wednesday, November 12 <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— SENATE; HEARINGS ON AIRPORT TRUST FUND AND AIR SAFETY<br />

LINCOLN, NEBR. - <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Aviation Subcommittee,<br />

which Nebraska’s U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON is expected to become<br />

chairman of in January, will hold a field hearing at Chicago’s<br />

O’Hare International Airport on Thursday, November<br />

<strong>Exon</strong>, currently the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee,<br />

said t:hehearing will take testimony on the reauthorization of<br />

the A\’iation Trust Fund, collison avoidance and air traffic<br />

contrc~l systems. <strong>The</strong> trust fund, supported by taxes on airline<br />

passenger tickets, fuel and tires, is designed to provide funds<br />

to ensure safe and efficient air travel. In addition, the<br />

hearing will focus on air traffic control delays in larger<br />

airpor”ts, including Chicago O’Hare International Airport, which<br />

is one of the nation’s busiest airports.<br />

RcjnGreerr manager of Eppley Airfield in Omaha, is scheduled<br />

to testify at the hearing.<br />

-<br />

n


Nebraska<br />

a’Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R T N<br />

EXON [POV C<br />

L:[NCOLN, NEBR . -- Nebraska U.S. Senator JIM<br />

Senators Ernest Hollings (D-SC) and William Cohen<br />

EXON will join<br />

(R-Maine) in a<br />

trip to the People’s Republic of China and South Korea which is<br />

leaving this Saturday.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> is a member of the Armed Services Committee and the<br />

Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee. <strong>The</strong> trip’s<br />

schedule will focus on military and trade issues.<br />

●<br />

<strong>The</strong> group will depart November 15th and return to the United<br />

States November 29th. In South Korea, the first stop of the<br />

trip, the senators will meet with the President<br />

of South Korea<br />

and the Minister of Foreign Affairs. In China they will meet<br />

with :pense.<br />

-<br />

n


<strong>News</strong><br />

. Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Rel!-ease Țhursday, November 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />

—— EXON El~LISTSCONGRESS’ SUPPORT FOR GOODYEAR<br />

LIl~COLN, NEBR. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) contacted<br />

Attorney General Edwin Meese and the Securities and Exchange<br />

Commission regarding the potential hostile takeover of the Goodyear<br />

Tire and Rubber Company. He has also written to all other 434<br />

Members of Congress to enlist support in protecting the community and<br />

nat:ioniilinterests involved in the possible takeover.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong>, a member of the Senate Commerce Committee, met Wednesday<br />

with employee and management representatives of the Goodyear plant<br />

Lincoln.<br />

in<br />

●<br />

to<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> bitter hostile takeover attempt of the Goodyear Tire and<br />

Rubber Corporation by Sir James Goldsmith points to some serious gaps<br />

in the federal securities and antitrust law,” <strong>Exon</strong> said in a letter<br />

all Members of Congress. “While the federal securities law<br />

proteccs share-holders’ investments, it does not take into sufficient<br />

consideration worker or community investments,” he stressed.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> said he “fears this latest financial tug of war between<br />

Goldsmith and the Goodyear management will not only compromise the<br />

significant ‘investment that the Lincoln Goodyear workers have made<br />

in their company, but will also damage the entire corporation in a<br />

manner which will not serve any interest,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator urged Edwin Meese, U.S. Attorney General,<br />

whc)heads the Department of Justice to “carefully monitor this<br />

acquisition attempt and take whatever steps are necessary to insure<br />

that the national interest is protected.” In <strong>Exon</strong>’s letter to Meese,<br />

he said “because the Goodyear Corporation is a major employer, a key<br />

defense contractor, and high technology firm, there is an important<br />

national interest in the outcome of this struggle.”<br />

nr86.137<br />

--30--


, 1<br />

FcIrReleasef Friday, November 14, <strong>1986</strong><br />

EXON : REAGAN SPEECH HURTS U.S. CREDIBILITY<br />

.—<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

Wi4SHINGTON, D.C. -- “<strong>The</strong> President is in charge of foreign<br />

polic:~ and I do not believe he has done anything illegal. That does<br />

not make his actions right and these are certainly morally wrong,”<br />

said IJ.S.Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong>, a senior member of the Senate Armed<br />

Services Committee.<br />

“While he was sending arms to Iran he was simultaneously<br />

the American people and our allies that it was wrong.”<br />

telling<br />

he and the Israelis want to deal with Iranian terrorists, so<br />

be it, But to whimper that he was unfairly treated by the American<br />

press when the ‘leak’ obviously came from his clandestine Iranian<br />

connered him the 34th vote necessary to sustain his arms sales to<br />

Saudi Arabia.w<br />

I<br />

‘He told me that the Saudis needed the arms to protect their oil<br />

fields from Iran. Before and after that, he was secretly supplying<br />

arms to Iran that obviously could be used against the Saudis. <strong>The</strong><br />

Presic~ent seems to believe that his being the major weapons supplier<br />

to th~:world best assures peace.n<br />

●<br />

‘He and his secret Iranian friends say there was no deal or<br />

discussions of arms for hostages. If you believe them both, then what<br />

did the President get?n<br />

have so deteriorated in our foreign policy that we are<br />

trying to become co-conspirators with the Ayatollah Khomeini and his<br />

ilk, t:henwe are truly headed for disaster.”<br />

- -<br />

n


Nebraska<br />

0 Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

For Rc>lease, S N<br />

— C<br />

P<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEBR), author of<br />

the law creating the new American gold coins, Friday urged the U.S.<br />

Mint to open additional production lines to meet the demand for the<br />

coins.<br />

Irla letter to Donna Pope, Director<br />

of the rJ.S.Mint, <strong>Exon</strong> said he<br />

has received numerous complaints about the lack of availability of the<br />

●<br />

“I urge you to consider, at least temporarily expanding production<br />

of the!coins ... It would be a shame to have a shortage situation<br />

coins and the Mint’s distribution<br />

system.<br />

during the holiday gift giving season,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator asked the Director of the Mint for a full<br />

report,on whether there is any evidence of ‘hoarding or excessive<br />

mark-up by the 25 designated primary distributors or their customers.”<br />

“I introduced the American Gold Bullion Coin Act to give the<br />

American people an alternative to investment in foreign gold, not to<br />

enrich large financial institutions,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

In addition, <strong>Exon</strong> requested U.S. Mint officials to investigate<br />

whether Japanese buyers have received preferential treatment in<br />

purchasing<br />

the smaller gold coins.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> popularity of these coins will continue only if the Mint acts<br />

● quickly to correct problems as they arise,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />

n<br />

- -


Nebraska<br />

●’ Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

I<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

C M B<br />

T 2<br />

FOR RELEASE, Tuesday, November<br />

EXIONSUBMITS TESTIMONY ON GOODYEAR TAKEOVER BATTLE<br />

—.—-<br />

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D–NEB) submitted<br />

testimony Tuesday to a special meeting of the House Judiciary<br />

Committee called to review the Goodyear takeover battle.<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> reiterated his opposition to Sir James Goldsmith’s<br />

hostile attempt to take control of the Goodyear Tire and Rubber<br />

Company. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Democrat who has sought Congressional and<br />

Administration opposition to the Goldsmith move told the<br />

Co]nmittee that the acquisition was not in the nation’s best<br />

interest, nor the interests of the communities involved. <strong>The</strong><br />

Senator renewed his call for the Administration to “intervene to<br />

prsvent the unnecessary destructiveness on the acquisition<br />

attempt.”<br />

<strong>Exon</strong>, a senior Senate Armed Services Committee member,<br />

●’ pointed to the national security issues involved in the Goodyear<br />

takeover attempt. “<strong>The</strong> importance of Goodyear as a defense<br />

contractor cannot be underestimated and the dangers of it<br />

falling under foreign control cannot be mitigated by selective<br />

liquidation of assets” <strong>Exon</strong>’s statement said. “We should be as<br />

protective of this defensive resource in peace time as we would<br />

be during war time.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> Senator also questioned corporate America’s ability<br />

to compete in the international market place when it must<br />

“constantly fear the hungry carnivores on Wall Street”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator’s statement said he will “continue to<br />

seek action from the Administration and will examine legislative<br />

avenues available to Congress.~<br />

n<br />

-<br />

Attachment


J<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R Monday, December 1 1<br />

‘ T p C<br />

C I T U O<br />

R<br />

O<br />

E S P I<br />

P C C H<br />

L U N 4<br />

T D 16TH. THE PRESENTATIOhJ WILL BE MADE IN<br />

SENATOR EXON’S LINCOLN OFFICE AT 2 F B 1<br />

C N T O<br />

P<br />

R<br />

b<br />

A<br />

C<br />

L N h f<br />

C 1 S<br />

a N A R<br />

d I P<br />

C u N<br />

<strong>The</strong> Index to the Papers of the Continental C<br />

1 i a i f v 67<br />

6 p gm<br />

the~st Important documents in our na~ion’s history, which<br />

are:located at the National Archives In Washington, D.C.<br />

v p a<br />

p p s d 5 d<br />

c C C d<br />

D Independence to the creation of the U.S.<br />

Constitution.<br />

n<br />

g w h s<br />

s i e h C<br />

i p N A R<br />

A<br />

N A<br />

o D I C<br />

R<br />

b<br />

d r h n<br />

d<br />

d<br />

i<br />

o<br />

n<br />

-


*<br />

?<br />

Nebraska<br />

●’ Jim E;on<br />

330 Hart Office Building<br />

Washington,D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R T D 1 1<br />

E J 1 S A N i O E N<br />

n<br />

W S ( a<br />

n 6 N y f a t t e p<br />

f s academies.<br />

n s S E S A<br />

S C c e p N<br />

s c i 1 a a<br />

r a u s o e2 n e f the U.S. n Air c<br />

* Force Academy and the U.S. Naval Academy. An unranked slate of 10<br />

nominees each were recommended for the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy<br />

and U.S. Military<br />

Academy.<br />

In.1 p v v<br />

F N A v<br />

M M M A<br />

F o a d s<br />

s a a a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

d s m<br />

p<br />

( E A P<br />

N S E N G A<br />

A L A A<br />

L S T L<br />

● C<br />

A<br />

A<br />

n<br />

r


1 .<br />

S E<br />

● I N 1 S A C<br />

F A V<br />

~ S A H<br />

~ k k<br />

S B H H<br />

(Cory Bremer Arlington High Arlington<br />

William Brooks Norfolk High (f8 N<br />

( o a d i cB<br />

M “ R H B<br />

I ( r w f c a to Pentagon)<br />

Douglas<br />

A<br />

A<br />

S<br />

S<br />

C<br />

C C<br />

I<br />

●’<br />

C<br />

J<br />

D<br />

S<br />

L<br />

A<br />

M<br />

C<br />

S<br />

S<br />

E<br />

S<br />

G<br />

G<br />

G<br />

K<br />

K<br />

K<br />

N<br />

P<br />

p<br />

P<br />

S<br />

S<br />

Z<br />

P<br />

A<br />

B<br />

M<br />

N<br />

L<br />

T<br />

L<br />

N<br />

O<br />

W<br />

M<br />

V<br />

S<br />

P<br />

N<br />

A<br />

L<br />

TL<br />

P<br />

a<br />

N<br />

= A<br />

B<br />

W B<br />

‘ H<br />

‘ J<br />

J J<br />

K<br />

N A V<br />

D L<br />

-( a<br />

L O C<br />

J M O W<br />

W M P<br />

‘ M L S<br />

M<br />

N<br />

O<br />

N<br />

P<br />

B<br />

P<br />

M<br />

R P Pius X<br />

T S C S<br />

T<br />

P<br />

C W C<br />

S A H<br />

t<br />

M S<br />

M H<br />

M<br />

M H<br />

M<br />

L H<br />

LHPK<br />

H H<br />

a<br />

P a p<br />

K C<br />

C P (<br />

r<br />

O<br />

OVER<br />

P<br />

L<br />

H<br />

N<br />

B<br />

SL<br />

P<br />

C<br />

P


.’<br />

S<br />

E<br />

N S A ●<br />

M A V<br />

N<br />

S A<br />

~ B ~ l<br />

Daniel Gammell<br />

Burke High<br />

Alicia Hargens<br />

Niobrara High<br />

Timothy Hoegemeyer Fremont High<br />

Kevin Kearns<br />

Millard North<br />

Todd Mason<br />

York High<br />

Susan Taylor<br />

Univ. of Nebr-Lincoln<br />

Rodd Thrower<br />

Bellevue East<br />

David Wells<br />

Elba High<br />

Maryann Ziegler<br />

Syracuse-Dunbar-Avoca Hi<br />

H<br />

=<br />

Omaha<br />

Niobrara<br />

Fremont<br />

Omaha<br />

York<br />

Omaha<br />

B<br />

C<br />

S<br />

H<br />

M M A V<br />

N S A<br />

J C ~<br />

~ u<br />

T D<br />

Republican Vailey<br />

I<br />

R G<br />

Roncalli High<br />

i<br />

J H<br />

Creighton Prep<br />

C H<br />

Blalr Highh e r<br />

L J Univ. of’Nebr-Lincoln a B<br />

S P<br />

Kearney High<br />

KTLL t o<br />

L P Tekamah-Herman<br />

r<br />

T R Lincoln High<br />

e<br />

C S Lfncoln Northeast<br />

k


Nebraska<br />

I<br />

e Jim E;on,<br />

Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R W D<br />

P I O C P U<br />

LINCOLN, NEBRASKA -- In honor of the forthcoming<br />

bicentennial of the Constl.tution i 1 U S J<br />

~ a f t N A a R r<br />

a<br />

A t d ad I t t P o mt<br />

i<br />

— C C t t U o o N o e n<br />

~,ateTuesday afternoon <strong>Exon</strong> presented the Index to Kent<br />

Hendrickson, Dean of Libraries at the University of<br />

Nebraska-Lincoln.<br />

I P C C<br />

1 i a i f v 67<br />

6 p gm<br />

t s<br />

. i d i o n h mn<br />

w o<br />

t l a t N A i W D o a a r<br />

v p a<br />

p p s d 5 d<br />

c C C d<br />

D I c<br />

C<br />

n<br />

g w h s<br />

s i e h C<br />

o<br />

i p N A R<br />

A<br />

N A<br />

o D I C<br />

R<br />

b<br />

d r h n<br />

d<br />

-<br />

n


Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

0 J’im<strong>Exon</strong> NeWs<br />

Contact: MarkBowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R W D<br />

T P M A<br />

W . S ( j o<br />

in. u R A p s<br />

M A ( f b d<br />

~fi~edo not believe the PMAs should be divested frOm f<br />

o w s a l M<br />

D O M B (<br />

c i e r 6 t 3 p a t<br />

t l T l w s b 1 s i eU<br />

S E Z<br />

e o<br />

‘ P M A<br />

t c a d i e r<br />

s<br />

! t increases will<br />

● n w l a g i<br />

b s w<br />

I b r<br />

f g i r<br />

c<br />

c f<br />

c s f t r a g r<br />

I w t o<br />

P s w<br />

<strong>The</strong> senators also urged the Administration not to propose<br />

requiring the repayment on federal multi-purpose water projects<br />

~~ndera straight-line amortization schedule. <strong>The</strong>y said using a<br />

straight-line amortization would also raise the rates of’many<br />

consumers who are already In an economic struggle. <strong>The</strong> senators<br />

noted that ‘all PMAs are current in their repayment.?’<br />

- -<br />

d<br />

o<br />

n<br />

r


Nebraska<br />

0’ Jim E;o;<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R , M D<br />

M f C R A G<br />

W S Z<br />

i M a N a<br />

r $ i g<br />

F A A n s<br />

M A r $ e<br />

a r i a r l s<br />

C A r $ t p<br />

●’ r e -


●<br />

Jim<br />

Nebraska<br />

U.S. Senator<br />

<strong>Exon</strong><br />

Hart Office Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20510<br />

<strong>News</strong><br />

. I Contact: Mark Bowen<br />

Telephone:202-224-4224<br />

R W D<br />

E D P T N<br />

W D E<br />

a S n N<br />

G s n s<br />

s t t N<br />

a f a r a<br />

l w A r a<br />

N G r s n<br />

n w m t t s<br />

l s c request.n<br />

<strong>Exon</strong> wrote to the DOE last August shortly after Nebraska<br />

Governor Bob Kerrey stopped a train transporting nuclear waste<br />

at the statefs southern border because the state had not been<br />

notified of the specific shipment. <strong>The</strong> train was carrying spent<br />

nuclear fuel from the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant in<br />

Pennsylvania.<br />

~Governors are responsible for public Safety and Protection<br />

for their states in the event of a mishap during transportation<br />

of a spent s w a f G I<br />

u h r<br />

s a s c e a<br />

c n p<br />

f p C C S<br />

r<br />

u b i a<br />

n c t w s<br />

p t d s<br />

e t s<br />

? a G s s a~<br />

m c a m e a G<br />

c r p s<br />

N<br />

s e p<br />

w<br />

-<br />

o<br />

n<br />

r


9 C A C<br />

—<br />

1310ckedMove of SCS T C<br />

O a c e S<br />

D A e L<br />

C S T C T e<br />

s L i<br />

r r s<br />

Senate Approval of Interstate Speed Limit Change<br />

In April 1956 <strong>Exon</strong> introduced legislation to allow the states to<br />

i s l i r S<br />

S a a f s<br />

r i s l a m<br />

C a b j H C<br />

f b r l<br />

i 1<br />

A D P A<br />

s S o a E<br />

: m a d p w<br />

\ f<br />

Congressional Approval of Airport Liability<br />

In the final days of the session the 99th Congress approved <strong>Exon</strong>ts<br />

Initiative to help prevent the potential closing of many small and<br />

rural airports facing enormous cost increases in liability<br />

:Lnsurance. Some rural a l i<br />

I p E p<br />

f a n c a c<br />

l i U President<br />

vetoed the measure which included <strong>Exon</strong>’s clearinghouse i.nitiati.ve.<br />

N P H R<br />

~Ixonwas instrumental in hammering out the final agreement of the<br />

Hydroelectric Relicensing Bill to ensure it protected Nebraskafs<br />

i f a e e r<br />

i e c r<br />

c<br />

d r p<br />

N G R B C<br />

C a E m permit National Guard and<br />

Fleserves to visit military commissaries ~ne day for each day of<br />

CLctiveduty, up to a maximum of 14 visits per year. v<br />

c o a d y c r<br />

e p e r<br />

C G R c<br />

c t a a<br />

o<br />

1<br />

o


C a S E<br />

l i i t<br />

a a S E l<br />

a<br />

C<br />

A A E<br />

h e s 1 c g<br />

c A g y F<br />

m n c p D<br />

c s b M e<br />

l m p<br />

r<br />

n<br />

N W A D<br />

i<br />

I o b 9~b p i R s E<br />

~ ~ N N<br />

F n w r a<br />

d p n 1 n<br />

f g e<br />

Odometer Fraud Signed into Law<br />

President Reagan also signed into law <strong>Exon</strong>?s legislation (S.475)<br />

to crack down on odometer fraud<br />

t<br />

p c d<br />

p a v w o m<br />

i t b s c ●<br />

c p o f e a t<br />

r vehicle mileage readings.<br />

Family Farm Credit Act<br />

In 1985 farm state Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong> and others blocked all Senate<br />

business until the Senate Republican Leadership agreed to consider<br />

emergency legislation to aid family operated farms facing an<br />

economic depression in rural America. <strong>The</strong> efforts led to the<br />

Congressional approval of legislation to provide farm credit to<br />

family sized farmers. Unfortunately, President Reagan vetoed the<br />

measure.<br />

T P F D<br />

s f 1 d l<br />

freeze on commodity target–prices. <strong>The</strong> Administration ~roposed<br />

only a one-year freeze. <strong>Exon</strong>~s effort doubled the length of the<br />

freeze to two full years.<br />

Reorganization of Defense Department<br />

<strong>Exon</strong>, a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, was<br />

o m C d<br />

D D R<br />

r<br />

y<br />

r<br />

e<br />

m m c o e<br />

t t n d<br />

●<br />

-<br />

c


E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

-....+-.— .-——-. .——.:.<br />

I<br />

Space Shuttle Must Continue<br />

Inani f A w<br />

c p t a S<br />

“ n s r<br />

e a l<br />

a a S S p<br />

s f b s r<br />

p o d e d<br />

e p N A<br />

S A ( t<br />

r o f R<br />

p l A s p<br />

c o a o d ap<br />

s p A f<br />

d d n a<br />

aq ac m s t s<br />

l u a p<br />

p A af n p<br />

g n a m s<br />

n s A a e<br />

n s f g b<br />

s s of our brave astronauts.<br />

a e s e<br />

n b s b c<br />

D r c a r d<br />

s l o e h<br />

p d al u c a<br />

r b p p<br />

l<br />

All America yearns to know the cause of the,explosion. It<br />

was a tragedywe all hoped would neveroccur, but subconsciously<br />

realized could happen. Congress will hold hearings on the accident,<br />

but it is NASA who will find the cause of the explosion.<br />

Yes, the space program willbe delayed whileNASA searches for<br />

answers, but the program will not stop. <strong>The</strong> investigativeteam<br />

willdevoteall the resourceswhichbuiltthe incrediblespaceshuttle<br />

toward findingthe cause. <strong>The</strong> investigationwilltake time and we<br />

should not expectquick answers. Rest assured if any one can find<br />

the cause of the explosion, it is NASA.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Challenger” crew did not die in vain. <strong>The</strong> nation’s<br />

spaceprogram willbe safer due to the unfortunate accidentwhich<br />

befellthe “Challenger’s” outstanding crew. <strong>The</strong>y symbolizedour<br />

nation’s best and were among the bold willingto put their lives<br />

on the line and push technology to the limits.<br />

We have shared the victories of space as a nation and now<br />

we haveshared the sorrow. Our national commitmentto the space<br />

program should be strengthened. We feel the loss in our hearts<br />

and won’t forget the tragedy, but we willlearn from the accident<br />

and America will again advance in space exploration.<br />

I


E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

●l<br />

c)<br />

Gramm-Rudmanand Agriculture<br />

Gramm-Rudman has been the law for just a short time and<br />

on March 1stit willbegin to take its toll on agriculture and rural<br />

America when $11.7 billion is expected to be cut from the current<br />

year federal budget.<br />

Some say agriculture won’t be harmed by Gramm-Rudman,<br />

but all the signspoint to deep cuts in farm programs important<br />

to Nebraska. Nearly everyday headlines appear specifying how<br />

Gramm-Rudman will cut programs from reducing commodity<br />

loan rates below their rock bottom levelsto cutting agriculture<br />

research at the University of Nebraska.<br />

Gramm-Rudman is not across-the-board deficit reduction as<br />

was touted in December. <strong>The</strong> Gramm-Rudman legislationwhich<br />

was attached to the President’s request to increase the debt ceilingto<br />

$2trillionexemptsmore than one-half of the federalbudget<br />

from cuts. That means the remaining one-half of the budget,<br />

whichincludesagriculture,must bear the burden $11.7<br />

billion in Gramm-Rudman automatic budget cuts.<br />

Agriculture programs comprise only about three percent of<br />

the total federal budget, yet under Gramm-Rudman it must bear<br />

over 11percent of the mandated cuts. No one objects, especially<br />

farmers, to taking a fair share of budget reductions to cut the<br />

budget deficit, but asking farmers to accept more than their share<br />

is wro,ng.Agricultural programs affect far more than just the nation’s<br />

two million farmers.<br />

I opposed Gramm-Rudman from the beginning because I<br />

recognized it would further damage the already depressed rural<br />

economy. I said then that a vote for Gramm-Rudman was a vote<br />

to cut agriculture and that premise has held true. Many in Congress<br />

who voted for it suggested the proposal would not harm<br />

agriculture. Now that reality has struck home, those who supported<br />

Gramm-Rudman are beginningto recognizethe dire consequences<br />

Gramm-Rudman brings to agriculture.<br />

Some of the same people who voted for Gramm-Rudman<br />

have suggestedthat the Congress should reopen the Farm Billto<br />

make improvements. Better it had been done right the first time.<br />

Reopening the Farm Bill might result in more reductions. I suspect<br />

the Administration would use such an opportunity to make<br />

further cuts in the farm program.<br />

No one denies the need to reduce the budget deficit. Working<br />

to reduce deficit spending has been one of my highest priorities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> nearly $200billion annual budget deficitsthe nation has<br />

experiencedduring the last fiveyears threatens our economic future.<br />

As a fiscalconservative,I support the BalancedBudgetConstitutional<br />

Amendment and have coauthored numerous budget<br />

proposals to freeze and reduce federal spending.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no doubt that the country needsto be put on a crash<br />

spending diet, but Gramm-Rudman is the wrong prescription.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are better, more responsible ways to reduce the deficit.


E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

Time to Get Tough on Espionage<br />

In 1985more than a dozen spy cases were uncovered. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

security breaches brought to light the need to reviewthe punishments<br />

for espionage.<br />

Judging from the recent cases, today’s espionageappears to<br />

be motivated more by financial gain than by political ideology.<br />

Today’s spies are molded in the figure of Judas, willing to sell<br />

their knowledgeand compromise their country for a quick buck.<br />

We as a nation cannot tolerate spyingby privatecitizens,military<br />

personnel or civil servants. Espionage, done for an ally or<br />

potential adversary, is a crime that victimizesall Americans. Traitors<br />

are an affront to our Constitution and Bill of Rights.<br />

Espionage should carry one of the most severepenalties, but<br />

that has not always been the case. <strong>The</strong> Armed ServicesCommittee,<br />

on which I serve, has made changes to crackdown on military<br />

personnel convicted of espionage. Last year, for example,<br />

the provisionsof military law were changed to include the death<br />

penalty as an option of the military courts for espionage. Previously<br />

the maximum punishment under military law was life imprisonment.<br />

This military law was not tough enough. It was not<br />

even a true life sentence because it allowed for parole within ten<br />

years.<br />

We need to employ lie detector examinations on a selective<br />

basis to protect our national security secrets and better deter<br />

would-be traitors.<br />

It isestimatedthat over one-thirdof all Sovietdiplomatshave<br />

full-timeresponsibilityfor gathering information in the U.S. This<br />

isespeciallyworrisomegiventhe sizeof the Sovietdiplomaticmissions<br />

at the United Nations, in Washington, D.C. and San<br />

Francisco.<br />

<strong>The</strong> government can deter spyingwith a thorough reviewof<br />

security clearances, but that is only a start. <strong>The</strong> U.S. needs<br />

to fight fire with fire by improving our counterintelligencetechniques<br />

to combat spying.<br />

Congressshould not drag its feet in enacting tougher penalties,<br />

beefingup U.S. counterintelligenceand taking the profit out<br />

of spying. I am also cosponsoring legislationto prevent convicted<br />

spiesfrom reaping profits by writingbooks or sellingtheir stories.<br />

Each day we wait gives foreign agents and traitors another<br />

opportunity to steal security secrets and victimize America.<br />

Week of March 3, <strong>1986</strong>


.<br />

E<br />

J<br />

E<br />

D<br />

a)<br />

@<br />

National SecurityVersus<br />

the Unbalanced Checkbook<br />

<strong>The</strong> Presidentis seeking$320billion,approximatelyone-third<br />

of the total federal budget, for the Defense Department in 1987.<br />

This is an increase of eight percent real growth after last year’s<br />

decline.In funding our defenseneedsCongress,the President and<br />

the American public face both the very real Soviet commitment<br />

and the equally dangerous federal budget deficit.<br />

As a senior member of the Senate Armed ServicesCommittee<br />

and a participant in our securitydecisions,I keep severalbasic<br />

thoughts in mind. First, there would be no winners in a nuclear<br />

war, so preventionis obviouslya necessity.Second,giventhe massiveSovietmilitary<br />

buildup, the U.S. requires sufficient military<br />

power to discourageaggressors. Third, whilestrong and modern<br />

armed forcesare needed for deterrence,militarysuperiorityis not.<br />

Fourth, while the Soviets substantially outnumber the U.S. in<br />

some categoriesof weaponry, we excelin others and the U.S has<br />

advantagesin technology,geography, and the combined strength<br />

of our allies to better balance the Soviet arsenal.<br />

In the foreseeablefuture it is inevitablethat nuclear technol-<br />

ogy will be the core of our national security since it cannot be<br />

‘Cuninvented.” Accordingly, we must modernize our forces with<br />

efforts like the B-1 and Stealth bombers, cruise missiles,mobile<br />

Midgetman missile and the Trident missile submarine. On the<br />

other hand, the MX missilebasing plan is vulnerable to attack<br />

and places a “hair-trigger” on our nuclear forces. Research of<br />

the Strategic Defense Initiative is needed, but it is not the “ultimate”<br />

weapon or necessarilythe best answerto our defenseneeds.<br />

Similarly, our conventional weapons programs must be<br />

scrutinizedto avert purchasingdefectiveweaponsand avoid duplication.<br />

Fewpeoplerealizethat conventionalweaponscan be more<br />

costly to buy and maintain than nuclear ones. If negotiations allow<br />

lessrelianceupon nuclear forces, our defensespendingwould<br />

probably remain high, to counter the large Sovietsuppliesof conventional<br />

forces.<br />

All arms reductions efforts are just as important as modernizingweapons.Althoughgreat<br />

differencesremain betweenthe two<br />

superpowers, I am guardedly optimistic that some meaningful<br />

nuclear arms reductions can be achieved. As we strive to reduce<br />

the risks of nuclear war we must work carefully to ensure that<br />

conventional war does not become a more attractive alternative.<br />

<strong>The</strong> nation’s security willcontinue to require a high levelof<br />

spending. While the amount the nation can afford to spend on<br />

defensemust be balanced by the need to reducethe budgetdeficit,<br />

we must not forget that factors outside our borders aIsoinfluence<br />

defense requirements.<br />

Now more than evereverydefensedollar must be spent wisely.<br />

Congressionalefforts to curb waste in defense spending must<br />

continue. This is important to maximizeour limited defense dollars<br />

and retain public confidence to finance our national security.<br />

We must do our best to balance the nation’s priorities among<br />

defense, domestic programs, includingagriculture, and reducing<br />

the federal budget deficit.


●)<br />

a<br />

E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

Lights, Camera,<br />

I Suggest the Absence of a Quorum!<br />

Live from the nation’s capitol, it’s the U.S. Senate! It won’t<br />

be that dramatic, but on June Ist the Senate will open its doors<br />

to live TV coverage. Radio coverage has already begun. <strong>The</strong><br />

proceedings will be available as a test until July 15th when the<br />

Senate will vote on whether to make the telecast permanent.<br />

Even though the House of Representativeshas been televised<br />

since 1979the Senate has not instituted TV coverage sooner because<br />

of concerns about how its rules and integrity might be affected.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Senate has very different rules than the House of<br />

Representatives.<strong>The</strong> 45 day test willallow the Senate to evaluate<br />

how televisionwillaffect the rules and determine if it willimpede<br />

or enhance the legislativeprocess.<br />

A major concern expressed has been how TV might affect<br />

the rules of filibuster and jeopardize the rights of the political<br />

minorities, such as the interests of the family farm. Unlike the<br />

House of Representatives, any member of the Senate may delay<br />

legislativebusiness with a filibuster.<br />

Others suspect that TV coverage may tempt senators to use<br />

the TV cameras as a platform to personally enhance their careers<br />

rather than address the issues. I’m hopeful senators will not let<br />

vanity stand in the way of business. Some fear that the Senate<br />

willbe bogged down by attempts to conduct committee business<br />

on the Senate floor simply so it could appear on TV.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Senate is known as the most deliberative body in the<br />

world so viewersshould not expectcoverageto challengethe networks<br />

for viewership ratings. TV coverage will change some of<br />

the preconceptions the public may have about the grandeur of<br />

the Senate.<br />

Viewersexpectingto see daily heated debate and a crowded<br />

room of senators willbe disappointed. <strong>The</strong> viewingaudiencedso<br />

should not assume that because they don’t see many senators in<br />

the chamber on TV that they are not working. <strong>The</strong> Senate chamber<br />

is usually very quiet, with only a few members in the chamber<br />

at any one time, exceptwhen votes are called. Senators spend<br />

most of their time working through a heavy scheduleof committee<br />

meetings where legislation is formed for floor action.<br />

Broadcasts of the Senate will improve America’s access to<br />

the actions of their elected officials, but there will be more to<br />

watching the Senate than just turning on the television. Viewers<br />

willneed to become familiar with Senate lingo and its sometimes<br />

complicated rules. Words like “cloture,” “quorum call,”<br />

“second-degree amendment” and others need to be understood<br />

to comprehend Senate actions.<br />

It is important to note that the Senate has always conducted<br />

its business in the open. More than 3,500 news reporters from<br />

across the country scrutinize every facet of the Senate and the<br />

Senators lives. Many Senate committee and subcommittee hearings<br />

are already telecast by C-SPAN, the group which televises<br />

the House of Representatives.<br />

Millionsof people depend on the electronic media for a significant<br />

portion of their news. Televisingthe Senate would seem<br />

the next step in the evolution of using modern technology to inform<br />

the public. <strong>The</strong> livetest is a worthy venture that I have supported.


E<br />

●’<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

●l<br />

D<br />

Reorganizingthe Defense Department<br />

to Meet Tomorrow’sNeeds<br />

Under legislation proposed by the Senate Armed Services<br />

Committee the Department of Denfense could see the first significant<br />

changes in its organization since Dwight D. Eisenhower<br />

was President.<br />

<strong>The</strong> need for change is clear. Even though the U.S. has the<br />

best equipped and trained armed forces ever fielded, weapons,<br />

warfare, and international relations have all become more complex.<br />

More than ever, it is necessaryto encourage strategic planning<br />

and streamline defense decision making.<br />

<strong>The</strong> reviewof the Pentagon began more than a year ago when<br />

I participated in a Georgetown University study which identified<br />

the need for organizational changes. Many of that study’s findingswerealsoreachedby<br />

the Armed ServicesCommittee,of which<br />

I am a senior member, and were used as the basis for the legislation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislationaddressesseveralseriousproblems within the<br />

existingDefenseDepartment hierarchy. Some of the problemsinclude:<br />

an overemphasis on the day-to-day management of the<br />

DefenseDepartment with too little attention to strategyand planning<br />

operations; an unhealthy competition between the armed<br />

services;and a lack of “joint” perspective by the services. Just<br />

as worrisome are the bloated and duplicative staffs.<br />

In today’s complex world of high tech weapons and rapidly<br />

changing political situations, the need for a “joint” perspective<br />

of strategicplanning and cooperation among all the militaryservicesis<br />

greater than ever. <strong>The</strong> individualarmed servicesmust think<br />

more as a team and lay aside parochial self-interests. Competition<br />

between the servicesis fine when the Army and Navy football<br />

teams play, but not when it comes to defending America.<br />

<strong>The</strong> legislationwould give more authority to the Chairman<br />

of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and place greater emphasis on the<br />

needs of the field combat commanders. <strong>The</strong> bill would eliminate<br />

duplicationby the large military and civilianstaffs in the Defense<br />

Department. For theseorganizationalchangesto be effectivethey<br />

must be accompanied by a change of attitude by each service.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Armed ServicesCommittee also indicatedthat Congress<br />

can aid in this reorganizationby not micromanagingeveryproject<br />

at the Pentagon. More and more in recentyearsCongresshas tried<br />

to participate in managing defense projects through the budget<br />

process. For example, in 1985Congressional Committees made<br />

1,848changes in the defense budget. Congress has the responsibility<br />

to review the Defense Department actions, but this many<br />

changessignalthat Congressmay have gotten too involvedin the<br />

day-to-day operations of projects. This much involvementtends<br />

to add to the bureaucracy which should be streamlined.<br />

Rapidly changing technology and international situations<br />

mandate that our high tech defense system is not made obsolete<br />

by an outdated decision making process. <strong>The</strong> amount of money<br />

spenton defenseis meaninglessunlesswe modernizethe organizational<br />

hierarchy of the Defense Department to meet the times.<br />

Week of March 24, <strong>1986</strong>


●’<br />

E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

Rural Lenders and Borrowers<br />

Get Some Relief<br />

After more than a year of meetings, letters, and Congressionalhearings,<br />

we have been successfulin pressuring the federal<br />

bank regulators to make some of the changes needed to help<br />

reduce the rising number of rural bank closingsand farm foreclosures.<br />

Federal regulators recently indicated they willease accounting<br />

rules on rural banks who have been hurt by the depressed<br />

agriculturaleconomy.<strong>The</strong> changes,whichshouldhave been made<br />

last year, couldpreventmore rural banks, farms and ranchesfrom<br />

being put on the auction block. We now must monitor their actions<br />

to make sure they match their words. I am also supporting<br />

an effort to make these bank regulation changes permanent law.<br />

Agricultural lenders continue to face serious problems because<br />

of high interest rates, an overvalued dollar, low farm income<br />

and decliningland values. Rural banks have been closing<br />

at an increasingrate. <strong>The</strong>seclosingshave forced hundredsof farmers<br />

and ranchersto deal with the FDIC on their outstandingloans.<br />

All too often this has led to many unnecessary farm and ranch<br />

foreclosures.Some agricultural bankers face the difficult options<br />

of foreclosing,riskingthe bank’s own liquidation or being forced<br />

into a merger by bank regulators. <strong>The</strong>re are other choices.<br />

In a recent report, the FDIC finally acknowledged the seriousness<br />

of farm bank problems in rural America previously ig-<br />

a<br />

nored. <strong>The</strong> report outlines the advantages of both a Net Worth<br />

and loss deferral programs as two measures to aid rural banks.<br />

Last year I proposed extending the Net Worth program, which<br />

is already law for home lending institutions, so the FDIC could<br />

aid similarlydistressedrural lenders. Similarly, a loan lossdeferral<br />

program would help rural areas by permitting farm banks to<br />

write-off their agricultural loan lossesover a number of years instead<br />

of limiting it to one year.<br />

<strong>The</strong> FDIC report correctly concludes, as I have suggested,<br />

that “a carefully constructed program that enables farm banks<br />

to defer or be reimbursed for some portion of their lossescould<br />

help reduce the number of bank failures and limit further disruptions<br />

to farm communities.”<br />

Decliningland values are a source of many rural economic<br />

problems. In Nebraska, farm land values have dropped as much<br />

as 50070since 1981.Establishinga secondarymarket for farm real<br />

estate and permitting banks to hold agricultural land for a longer<br />

period of time are two options being considered by the Congress<br />

to ease the pressure on rural America. It may also be preferable<br />

for banksto leaseland whichhas been foreclosedback to the operator,<br />

rather than sellingit out from underneath a temporarilytroubled<br />

borrower.<br />

Closing a small town’s only bank seriouslyaffects the com-<br />

‘. munity’s economic viability. Federal bank regulators need to<br />

recognizethat a troubled rural bank isjust as serious as an ailing<br />

multi-national bank. In my opinion, federal regulators have not<br />

o)<br />

givensmall farm lenders and their borrowers the same consideration<br />

givento largebanks like,ContinentalIllinoisNational Bank,<br />

which are supposedly “too large to fail.’ FDIC a<br />

b b C I a<br />

c a “ s e<br />

l


E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

AgricultureFares Well<br />

1987 Budget CommitteeProposal<br />

For the first time in a number of years the Senate Budget<br />

Committeeworked in a uniquebipartisan manner and sentits 1987<br />

budget proposal to the full Senate. This budget is very fair to<br />

agriculture. <strong>The</strong> Committee rejected the Administration’s plans<br />

to severelycut rural programs.<br />

As a fiscal conservative, I have always advocated the need<br />

to balance the federal budget. Like families and businessesthe<br />

federal government must balance its accounts or risk the consequencesof<br />

financial ruin. <strong>The</strong> federal government, however, has<br />

violated this basic economic rule for a number of years. It has<br />

continually spent more than it received in tax revenue.<br />

Since1981,the national debt -- the accumulationof the yearly<br />

budget deficits -- has more than doubled to $2 trillion. Annual<br />

deficits of $200 billion have become commonplace since the<br />

“supply side” economic revolution of the last five years. This<br />

record r b f s b<br />

g n f l<br />

g<br />

● ) S B C w h<br />

a p b b b e<br />

r d w m s a<br />

t f f r C b<br />

a i P b p<br />

r d b b<br />

C b p a s<br />

r ab f f p<br />

r o I p ab f a<br />

an y C s r<br />

r m i t c<br />

l am c g i<br />

n f C r a<br />

P r b r<br />

t o s r E p<br />

C a r p<br />

R E A R T A<br />

a e p A<br />

p s r p<br />

C b b b<br />

d l p G<br />

S B C c G<br />

d t P b m<br />

b P b p a<br />

C B O w r in a $160billiondeficit.<br />

This would exceedthe Gramm-Rudman deficit levelsand trigger<br />

●l<br />

more automatic budget cuts. A second Gramm-Rudman budget<br />

cut would seriously harm agricultural programs.<br />

I am hopeful that the bipartisan spirit of the Senate Budget<br />

Committeewhichproduced this agreement, willcarry this budget<br />

through the Congress. <strong>The</strong> Senate Budget Committee bipartisan<br />

proposal represents a giant step toward fiscal discipline.<br />

Apri] 21, <strong>1986</strong>


●’<br />

o)<br />

E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

Drawing the Line on Terrorism<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States has drawn the line against Libyan-backed<br />

terrorism. Libya has been a sanctuary for terrorists to plan attacks,<br />

but the recent American bombing raid on Libyan terrorist<br />

training areas has made Colonel Khadhafy fully aware that the<br />

United States willrespond to terrorist aggressions.America will<br />

not sit quietly while innocent people die in unprovoked terrorist<br />

attacks.<br />

Terrorism is an ever-present danger in today’s world which<br />

is difficult to counter becauseit is usuallyindiscriminateand unpredictable.<br />

Too many Americans have suffered and been killed<br />

as a resultof terrorist acts. America must take all possibleprecautions<br />

against terrorism and strike back whenever necessary. <strong>The</strong><br />

interceptionand capture of the hijackersof the cruiseship Achille<br />

Lauro illustratedwhat our intelligenceand armed forcesare capable<br />

of accomplishingwhen the occasion presents itself. Given the<br />

evidenceof past Libyan involvementin terrorism, the President<br />

had no choice but to order the air strike against Libya on April<br />

14th.<br />

Closecooperation with other governmentsis essentialto effectivelycombat<br />

terrorism. On numerous occasions, the United<br />

States has worked with other governments and successfully<br />

preventedterrorist acts. <strong>The</strong>se ties must be strengthened. Nations<br />

mustwork togetherto form an internationalagreementthat would<br />

defineinternationalterrorism,denypoliticalsanctuaryto terrorists<br />

anywhere in the world, and impose economic sanctions against<br />

nations supporting terrorism.<br />

Other defensivemeasures must also be taken to prevent terrorist<br />

acts. Airport and airline security must be improved. Congress<br />

has approved more airport security inspections and an<br />

expansionof the “Sky Marshal” program. Stepshave been taken<br />

to improvethe securityof buildingsand installationsoperated by<br />

the United States overseas. Our government officials and service<br />

personnel are receivingcounter-terrorism training. Nonetheless,<br />

the recent bombing of a TWA jetliner and several terrorist acts<br />

against U.S. servicemenand their dependents in Europe reveal<br />

that still stronger security measures are needed.<br />

With the exception of Great Britain, I was disappointed at<br />

the attitude of our European allies to the bombing of Libyan<br />

bases. Even though European nations have been the repeated victimsof<br />

terrorism,they havenot acted decisivelyagainststate sponsoredterrorism.Untilrecently,mostEuropean<br />

allieshavenot even<br />

supported economicsanctionsor diplomaticactions. Instead they<br />

tried to avoid the reality of the attacks and distanced themselves<br />

from the problem. <strong>The</strong>n, ironically, they complain that Americans<br />

are not vacationing in Europe.<br />

<strong>The</strong> recent diplomatic actions taken by the European Community<br />

to limit the travel rights and number of Libyan officials<br />

are a step in the right direction, but still far short of what is<br />

needed.Terrorismthreatensthe peopleof all nationsand the sooner<br />

all nations join in the effort to fight it, the sooner it will be<br />

defeated.


.)<br />

Interstatesare among the safestroads in America. <strong>The</strong>y were<br />

built for safe travel at speedshigherthan 55 mph. <strong>The</strong>re is a myth<br />

that the publicobeysthe 55mph law and that it isbeingenforced.<br />

In reality the statistics tell a story of wholesale violations.<br />

Givingstatesthe option to increasethe INTERSTATE speed<br />

limit to 70 mph, or even 65 mph if that is acceptable, without<br />

losingfederalhighwayfunds, as I propose, makes sensewhen you<br />

look at the statistics. <strong>The</strong> 55 mph law would be RETAINED on<br />

all other roads, which is where the most traffic fatalities occur.<br />

Interstate travelers know traffic goes faster than the ignored<br />

55 mph limit. <strong>The</strong> U.S. Department of Transportation statistics<br />

show that the speed at which most traffic moves on rural interstate<br />

is 64 mph in Nebraska and is 66 mph nationally. It is obvious<br />

from the figures that on Nebraska’s rural interstate the<br />

legislation would in reality only raise the speed limit five miles<br />

per hour above what motorists are actually driving. If we compromise<br />

on 65 mph for rural interstates, we would be exactly at<br />

the speed most people travel and they could do it legally.<br />

In 1985,only 3,918 tickets were issued to motorists traveling<br />

between 56 mph and 65 mph on Nebraska’s interstate, while<br />

27,364ticketswereissuedto motoristsexceeding65 mph. According<br />

to the Department of Transportation, an astounding 86 percent<br />

of the traffic on Nebraska’s rural interstate exceedsthe 55<br />

mph law. Much of this leniencycan be attributed to Nebraska’s<br />

minimal$10 fine and no lossof driving points if caught speeding<br />

less than 65 mph on the interstate.<br />

Critics of givingthe states the option to raise the interstate<br />

speedhavecitedmisleadingfatality figures.<strong>The</strong>y refer to the number<br />

of fatalities on all Nebraska roads, while the bill deals ~<br />

with interstates. —<br />

Safety officials attribute too many deaths to speed. In 1985<br />

less than five percent of Nebraska traffic fatalities occurred on<br />

interstates and speed was not listed as a factor in ANY of them.<br />

More than 90 percent of fatalities nationwide occur on roads<br />

which would retain the 55 mph law.<br />

Skepticsincorrectly assume that if the interstate speed were<br />

raised to as much as 70 mph motorists would drive 75 mph or<br />

more. This is wrong since the minimal penalty would no longer<br />

exist as an incentiveto break the law. Strict enforcement of the<br />

70 mph limit on interstates and 55 mph law on other roads, accompanied<br />

by expensivefines, would discourage speedingon all<br />

roads. People drive at the enforced speed limits, not just those<br />

posted.<br />

Finallythe 55 mph law was enacted in response to an energy<br />

crisis. No one has forgotten the oil shortages, but today we have<br />

an entirelydifferent situation. If we encounter another energycri-<br />

sis, we may have to reduce limitsagain. Now, autos are more fuel<br />

efficient and fuel prices are stable. Also we must recognizethat<br />

the interstate system is less than seven percent of all highways.<br />

With these facts in mind, increasingthe interstate limitwould not<br />

significantlyaffect consumption or safety.<br />

e<br />

E<br />

J<br />

U<br />

E<br />

S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

States Should Have the Option to<br />

Increasethe InterstateSpeed Limit<br />

Week of May 19, <strong>1986</strong>


●)<br />

o<br />

E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

<strong>The</strong> Tax Reform Rocket<br />

Tax reform is taking off like a rocket herein the Senate. <strong>The</strong><br />

Senate Finance Committee, in sending the tax reform bill to the<br />

Senate floor with a unanimous vote, has taken the first bold step<br />

to modernize the tax system in 30 years.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill contains significantreductions in tax rates for both<br />

individuals and businesses. It simplifies the individual tax rate<br />

structure by reducing from 14 to 2 the number of tax brackets.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two new brackets for individuals would be 15Y0and 27V0,<br />

nearlycuttingin one-halfthe current top tax bracket of 50070.<strong>The</strong><br />

top corporate tax rate would be reduced from 46V0to 330/0.<br />

<strong>The</strong> measure eliminatesmost of the unfair tax shelters used<br />

by nonfarmer-ranchers to unfairly compete against our family<br />

farm interests. This will discourage most nonfarmers from entering<br />

agricultureto operate it as a loss simplyso they can escape<br />

paying taxes on other income.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tax reform packageincludesa minimumtax on largecorporations<br />

which have been escaping their federal tax liabilities.<br />

This is a major step toward tax equity which I have advocated<br />

for many years.<br />

One area whichhopefullycan be further reviewedby the full<br />

Senateis the total eliminationof deductibilityof IndividualRetirement<br />

Account (IRA) contributions. We are reviewingoptions to<br />

at leastpartirdlyrestorethe deductibilityof IW. IRAswerecreated<br />

in 1981to stimulate individualsto better plan for their retirement.<br />

IRAs were also viewed as an incentiveto increase savings<br />

in the United States and to improve capital formation. Among<br />

industrialized nations we are the worst “savers.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> Senate tax reform bill includes some provisions which<br />

would particularly benefit farmers. <strong>The</strong> Senate bill would permit<br />

farmers to deduct up to one-half the cost of their health insurance<br />

premiums. We are asking farmers, ranchers and small business<br />

owners to advise us of any concerns they find with the bill<br />

as all review its details.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Senate tax reform bill is vastly superior to the version<br />

approved by the House of Representativeslast fall. I am confident<br />

that the Senate bill will serveas the framework upon which<br />

the final tax reform bill will be approved by Congress.<br />

A consensus has developed that the Senate tax reform<br />

proposal appears, on the whole, to be a good bill with many advantages.Despitesomeof<br />

the drawbacksto the billI am enthusiastic<br />

about the opportunity to improveour current complicatedand<br />

confusing tax system.<br />

A struggleis beginning to emerge as to whether tax reform<br />

should proceed ahead of the 1987budget bill. With the staggering<br />

deficitproblem and the Gramm-Rudman law of blind acrossthe-board<br />

cuts threatening programs, it seemsobviousto me that<br />

the budget should be the first priority followed immediately by<br />

tax reform. Yet, the Senate Republican leadership, who schedules<br />

action, has failed to abide by the Gramm-Rudman requirement<br />

that the federal budget be finished by April 15th.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no reason not to put both of these important measures<br />

on a fast track. <strong>The</strong> taxpayers are ready for the Senate to<br />

act. <strong>The</strong> country is waiting. Let’s not delay.<br />

For Week of June 2, <strong>1986</strong>


●)<br />

@<br />

E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

GrainQualityImportantto IncreasingExports<br />

<strong>The</strong> export grain market isveryimportant to American farmers.<br />

With the growing competitivenessbetween nations on the<br />

world grain market, it is vital that the United States grain be of<br />

superior quality.<br />

We have all heard the horror stories about U.S. grains being<br />

criticizedby customers for being of inadequate quality. During<br />

the past fiveyears, agriculturalexportshavedecreased28qo,from<br />

$41billionin 1980to $29billionin 1985.<strong>The</strong> criticalstoriesabout<br />

lowqualitystandards has been a factor contributingto the decline<br />

of U.S. grain exports.<br />

Adding nongrain materials to export grains hurts the reputation<br />

of the American farmer and American exporter. It only<br />

takes one bad shipment of poor quality grain for a foreign customer<br />

to decide the low quality is not worth the price and go to<br />

one of our competitors, like Canada, Argentina, or in Europe.<br />

I am supporting legislationwhich would improve the quality<br />

of grain exportedby imposingnew, stricterstandards. <strong>The</strong> legislation<br />

would prevent an export elevator from adding nongrain<br />

materials to grain designated for export. In addition, I am supporting<br />

trade legislationthat would provide payment-in-kind incentives<br />

for improved export grain quality.<br />

Exported grain quality simply must be improved. <strong>The</strong> U.S.<br />

has enough difficulty fightingthe tariffs and trade barriers being<br />

erected against U.S. exports without having to deal with a poor<br />

quality product being delivered.<br />

U.S. farmers are being undercut in the world market by foreign<br />

farmers who are heavilysubsidizedby their nation’s treasuries.<br />

U.S. farmers produce the highest quality of farm goods at<br />

the most efficient rate. Without a doubt this high quality should<br />

be passed along to our foreign customers. A high quality product<br />

will ensure repeat customers and increased agricultural exports.<br />

<strong>The</strong> end result willbe better market prices, a stronger agricultural<br />

economy and higher farm incomes.<br />

It is in the best interest of our agricultural sector to make<br />

grain quality standards tougher. It willdemonstrate to customers<br />

on the world market that the United States farmer and hisgovernment<br />

are committed to providing the highest quality grain available.<br />

It could also erase a perception caused by previous<br />

agricultural embargoes that the United States is not a reliable<br />

supplier.<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States must be aggressive in recapturing<br />

customerson the world agricultural markets. To recapture those<br />

customers, our nation, just as any businesswould, must offer the<br />

best product available on the world market. Our farmers can<br />

produce the best product and federal law should ensure that the<br />

best product is delivered.<br />

Week of June 16, <strong>1986</strong>


. . —-. ...— . . .-..—.<br />

1<br />

E<br />

D<br />

J E<br />

U S S I<br />

F N<br />

Yes to Wheat ReferendumPoll<br />

Oncea the Administration is sidingwith bakers, millers<br />

and exporterson an important matter facingAmerica’sstruggling<br />

food producers. This affront is directed at the upcoming wheat<br />

produc:erpoll, and the Administration is supporting lower wheat<br />

prices.<br />

In the past severalweeksfarmershavebeendelugedwithprice<br />

and set-asideestimates that could result from a mandatory program.<br />

,4s expected,the Department of Agriculturehas publicized<br />

projectionswhichvery convenientlysupport the Administration’s<br />

position. We need only cite the Department’s mishandling and<br />

faulty projections of the impact of the Dairy Termination Program<br />

to realizethat their numbers are suspect and the real question<br />

is the direction we should take in agricultural policy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Reagan Administration would have us believethat increased<br />

exports will be the salvation of American agriculture.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no basis in fact for this. Indeed, during the nearly six,<br />

years of its policieswe have witnessedone of the steepestcrashes<br />

in producerpricesin history. Savea sustainedworld-widedrought<br />

or someother unexpecteddisaster,there is littlechancefor a price 1<br />

turn-around. Do we wager what is left of family farm solvency<br />

on a long shot chance of a world-wide disaster? I strongly urge<br />

againsl.such a policy or folly as I view it.<br />

Even if .4dministration farm policiesdo result in increased<br />

exportf;,improvementsin domesticfarm incomedo not seemlike-,<br />

Iy. One anal!{sisof the 1985Farm Bill (conducted with the help ~••‹ðž–•ˆ••Œ,mz•<br />

of two highlyregardedMidwesternland grant universities)predicts<br />

that farm income willdeclinefrom $26.6billion in 1985to $21.8I<br />

billion in 1989.That amounts to an 18percent reduction. An 18~<br />

percentreductionin income,evenfor those farmers not now nearing<br />

bankruptcy, would be devastating. It would be the “swan 1<br />

song” for much of rural America, tearing away at the basic fiber<br />

of society in greater Nebraska.<br />

In addition to domestic farm prices, farmers must consider t<br />

world-wideagriculturalproduction possibilities.<strong>The</strong> world is now<br />

produ(:ingmore food than ever thought possible. Biologicaland<br />

techni(:aladvances have put agriculture at the brink of an un-,<br />

precedented production explosion. Any country with an ounce<br />

of common sense will grab the opportunity to become selfsufficient<br />

in food<br />

as the United States accomplished<br />

in its beginnings.<br />

Somestartlingexamplesof this increasedagriculturalproduction<br />

are evident. China has been able to increase wheat production<br />

by more than 300 percent since 1960with very little change<br />

in wheat acreage.China currentlyusesabout 11percentof its land<br />

for agriculture. What will happen when they expand their available<br />

areas?<br />

China is not alone. From 1960to 1985,Bangladeshincreased<br />

wheatproductivityby 4,797percent, starting at 29,000metrictons<br />

in 1960and ending in 1985with 1.4 million metric tons.<br />

India has achieved successin wheat production, largely by<br />

expanding the area harvested. From 1960to 1985India’s wheat<br />

production rose by 329 percent, and since 1980rose another 39<br />

percent.<br />

A significantlynew trend in world food production has been<br />

established. If policy makers and American farmers ignore that<br />

trend, the result willbe continued depressionand uncertainty for<br />

our producers.<br />

In addition to considering foreign production capabilities,<br />

American farmers should bear in mind the cost of current farm<br />

programs. <strong>The</strong> current program willcost the governmentbillions<br />

of dollars over the next several years. In this era of staggering<br />

federal expenditures, the future of expensiveprograms, no matter<br />

how well-intendedand necessary,is precariousat best. Bycontrast,<br />

controversial as a mandatory program might be, it will<br />

greatly reduce federal-expenditures and begin to inject muchneeded<br />

income into a depressed rural America. It will bring<br />

profitablesupplyinto balancewith reasonabledemand. <strong>The</strong> sooner<br />

we realize we cannot “produce” our way out of this agricultural<br />

dilemma, the better.<br />

<strong>The</strong> vote that farmers cast in this poll will be one of their<br />

most important. It willsend a clear message,one way or another,<br />

as to how satisfiedAmerica’swheat farmers are with current farm<br />

policies.I urge them to send a messageto the President and Congressthat<br />

current pricesare not acceptableand that they are willing<br />

to do their part in reducing government subsidies and<br />

improving farm t)rices.<br />

June 30, <strong>1986</strong>


E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

National Guard & ReservesRole in Defense<br />

<strong>The</strong> largest portion of our nation’s defense budget goes<br />

toward the pay and benefits of the men and women who serve<br />

in the armed forces and endure the riggers of military life.<br />

Recognizingthis fact, Congresshas embracedthe Total Force<br />

Conceptprogram whichincreasesrelianceupon the part-time soldiers,<br />

sailors,and airmen of the National Guard and the Reserves.<br />

Sincethe Guard and Reservesservein uniform only one weekend<br />

per month and two weeks annual active duty, and do not fully<br />

qualifyfor militaryhealth care and governmenthousing,they cost<br />

much Iess to operate than active duty personnel.<br />

Another factor encouraginggreater relianceupon the Guard<br />

and Reservesis that the membersof theseunitsare talented, motivated<br />

personnelwho often have servedmany years of activeduty<br />

experience.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Total Force Concept integrates the Guard and Reserves<br />

closer than ever into our nation’s overall military strategy. In a<br />

time of crisis,Guard and Reserveunitswould mobilizeand deploy<br />

overseas either before or with their active duty counterparts.<br />

<strong>The</strong> goal of the Total Force Concept is to make the Guard<br />

and Reservesas prepared as the active armed forces. Right now<br />

the Guard and Reservecomprise 35070of the Army combat divisions,<br />

86Y0of the Navy’sminesweepers,nearly 70070of the fighter<br />

planes protecting the United States, and one-third of all the<br />

Air Force’s fighter planes.<br />

With this greater reliance on the Guard and Reserves, the<br />

days of the “weekend warrior” are gone. What was once two<br />

weeks annual training is now frequently three weeks. Instead of<br />

two days per month, additional eveningsare frequently needed<br />

to achieve the required levels of readiness.<br />

Despiteitssuccess,somequestionsremain regardingthe Total<br />

Force Concept. First, although Guard and Reserveunits are less<br />

expensive,the cost is still high in order to make them as ready<br />

as active military units. Higher readiness can only be achieved<br />

by providing the Guard and Reserveswith greater support services<br />

from the active duty services.<br />

Another major difficulty arises in purchasing the quantities<br />

of needed modern equipment. Despite the modernization of<br />

weapons,many Guard and Reserveunitshaveobsoleteequipment,<br />

such as agingaircraft and Korean War-vintageanti-aircraft guns.<br />

<strong>The</strong> readiness of military units also depends on the number<br />

of personnel assigned and the amount and quality of training.<br />

Here again,the Guard and Reservesface seriouschallenges.Training<br />

one weekenda month and two weeksa year is not much time<br />

to developand maintain militaryskills.More training time is possible,<br />

but when it conflicts too much with a civilian career and<br />

family life it jeopardizes retention of personnel.<br />

Despitethe dedicationof allinvolved,there are inherentlimits<br />

to what we can expect of the Guard and Reserves. Nonetheless,<br />

the Guard and Reservesare and must remain an instant, keycomponent<br />

of our nation’s defense, a new role for these talanted<br />

forces.<br />

Week of July 14, <strong>1986</strong>


● 1<br />

E<br />

J<br />

U<br />

E<br />

S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

In Debt Up to Our Ears<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States is a world leader for democratic, industrial,<br />

agricultural and scientific achievements. On the darker side<br />

the United States is also the world’slargestdebtor nation. A debtor<br />

nation relies on foreign investmentsto finance its economy.<br />

Our new debtor nation status hangs as a noose around the<br />

economicneck of the United States;just as it does for Venezuela,<br />

Mexico,Argentina and many third world nations which titter on<br />

the verge of economic catastrophe.<br />

<strong>The</strong> debtor nation status jeopardizes the country’s economic<br />

health and security. For the last 72 years foreign nations have<br />

asked the United States for investment capital, but in 1981the<br />

tables began to turn and the USA now looks to foreigners for<br />

money to support investment and government spending habits.<br />

<strong>The</strong> federal governmentis the nation’s biggestborrower. Interest<br />

on the national debt already takes the first 15cents of every<br />

tax dollar collected. <strong>The</strong> old adage of “tax and spend” has<br />

been replacedwith “borrow and spend.” Instead of cuttingspending<br />

sufficiently, raising taxes or using a balanced approach of<br />

both, the federal government has borrowed money to pay for increased<br />

spending and giveaways.<br />

It took 105years for the national debt to reach $1 trillion.<br />

Now only sixyears later, the national debt has doubled to $2trillion<br />

and President Reagan has a request before Congressto raise<br />

it further to $2.3trillion.That is a sad legacyto leaveour children.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ugly facts are startling. In 1970our national debt was<br />

$383 billion; $544 billion in 1975;$1 trillion in 1981,and over<br />

$2 trillion in <strong>1986</strong>. “Supply-side” economics has not increased<br />

the savingsneededto financethe federal government’shuge hunger<br />

for credit. Instead supply-sideeconomic policies of the last<br />

four years have resulted in an unhealthy reliance on foreign<br />

money. This dependencehides the real costs of deficit spending.<br />

Rather than creating hyper-inflation, or a recession, they have<br />

substituted record borrowing. <strong>The</strong> nation’s borrowing spree has<br />

produced record trade deficits and doubled the national debt.<br />

<strong>The</strong> merchandisetrade deficitgrewfrom $25.5billionin 1980<br />

to over $148billion in 1985.<strong>The</strong> U.S. Department of Commerce<br />

estimates that 25,000 American jobs are lost or not created for<br />

every $1 billion increase in the trade deficit. To make matters<br />

worse, economists do not see any quick reversal of the nation’s<br />

trade deficit.<br />

To restore our international economic standing the federal<br />

government must reduce its demand for credit. Cutting deficit<br />

spending and reforming the federal budget process is the key to<br />

reducingthe trade deficit. Unfortunately, the legislativegimmick<br />

known as the Gramm-Rudman law targets spendingcuts in ordy<br />

about one-half of the total federal budget while protecting the<br />

rest from cuts.<br />

If there is a silver lining in the nation’s debtor status, it is<br />

that it might act as a catalystto prompt action. <strong>The</strong> nation’s debtor<br />

status is a warning signalthat all is not well.<strong>The</strong> United States<br />

must heed the warning and act befo=the noose strangles the<br />

e<br />

c


E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

A 2<br />

‘ L<br />

S H A<br />

t<br />

N<br />

S A C a<br />

S Z I a<br />

hearing at the request of the Nebraska Legislature. It will be<br />

held Thursday, August 28th at 9 U<br />

Nebraska-Lincoln, East Campus U<br />

y n e p<br />

a a y a e<br />

E c p f v<br />

p S b f e<br />

e s s A<br />

A<br />

r a p<br />

d c p s c<br />

w m A a a<br />

f a A<br />

a d r w<br />

o<br />

O<br />

w v<br />

c c ‘ p<br />

d f r<br />

1 w e a p<br />

t d p u<br />

a w a a<br />

In y e f a<br />

d


percent of production; back near a level where they more<br />

traditionally<br />

have been.<br />

Over y United States has aided many countries<br />

with technology in an effort to help them be food<br />

self-sufficient. This is an honorable task but it has taken a<br />

further toll on United States farm exports. By helping some<br />

c e t p c<br />

s<br />

a<br />

e m icompeting<br />

ourselves with our own money.<br />

So why have a Senate hearing i[] ~i~ti~aska? ??irsk, too many<br />

W e e t t p<br />

t s p g b<br />

R A w p A<br />

s b F<br />

r s b o b p<br />

p<br />

e<br />

9<br />

people participate<br />

in finding the solutions.<br />

Part of the solution may be production controls. Earlier<br />

this s D A p<br />

c a w p r<br />

c b t H a<br />

the h r w<br />

w f w a p c r<br />

the surpluses and improve pri{:e:;.<br />

I encourage farmers and farm organization officials to<br />

attend the hearing. Agriculture is our priority. If agriculture<br />

hurts, all Nebraska<br />

feels the pain.<br />

-0<br />

—---<br />

A


Senate Needs Efficiency to Finish Work<br />

<strong>The</strong> Congresshas four weeksto complete all of its business<br />

before its scheduled adjournment on October 3rd. We may not<br />

make it. I am for staying on the job until we do it right. Still remaining<br />

on the work calendar are a number of substantial pieces<br />

of legislationincluding President Reagan’s request to again increase<br />

the debt ceiling, the defense budget, the tax reform bill,<br />

the deficit restraints, most of the authorization and appropriations<br />

bills and more.<br />

In agriculture I will be using the suggestionsof those who<br />

testified at the Senate hearing in Lincoln to initiate changes in<br />

the current Farm Bill by administrative action. <strong>The</strong>re probably<br />

is not time for extensivelegislativeremedy this year. It is clear<br />

that the Administration’sFarm Billis a disaster, as I warned early<br />

in opposing it.<br />

Awaiting final action is President Reagan’s annual request<br />

to again increase the national debt ceiling, this time to $2.3 trillion.<br />

When he became President, the national debt was lessthan<br />

$1 trillion. latest request has been convenientlystalledby the<br />

so-calledGramm-Rudman “fro.” <strong>The</strong> “fix” was crafted after the<br />

automatic budget cutting provision in the original Gramm-<br />

Rudman law was ruled unconstitutional.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “fix” is an unnecessary delaying tactic. <strong>The</strong> original<br />

Gramm-Rudmanlaw containeda backup provisionwhichrequires<br />

the Congress to vote on the formula budget cuts if the U.S.<br />

Supreme Court ruled the automatic across-the-board cuts provision<br />

unconstitutional. <strong>The</strong> new proposed “fix” transfers budget<br />

cuttingfrom the Congressto the Directorof the Officeof Managementand<br />

Budget.I firmlybelieveCongressshouldfollowthe Constitution<br />

and vote on the budget cuts rather than pass the deficit<br />

buck to a non-elected bureaucrat of the executivebranch. Taxpayers<br />

elected Congressto make tough decisions.Voters should<br />

knowwheretheir electedofficialsstand on thesebudgetquestions.<br />

I opposed the “fix,” just as I opposed the original Gramm-<br />

Rudman law. It is one more Congressionalcop-out to avoid the<br />

responsibility of individual budget cuts. <strong>The</strong> Gramm-Rudman<br />

legislationis being used again, just as it was the first time, to disguisethe<br />

voteto increasethe national debt ceilingto a new record<br />

of $2.3trillion. It is ironic the Gramm-Rudman supporters claim<br />

that by raising the national debt Congresscan reduce the deficit.<br />

If Gramm-Rudman is so good, Congress should vote cin it<br />

separately and not tie it to the debt ceiling.<br />

I will also be participating in Senate-House conference on<br />

the 1987DefenseAuthorization bill. We must get defense spending<br />

under control whilemaintainingan adequate defense.We will<br />

be continuing our Armed ServicesCommittee careful review of<br />

the vitalongoingnegotiationswith the Sovietson arms reductions.<br />

That is the only real long-term possibility to a safer world.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are many more important items which must be addressedbefore<br />

adjournment. Unfortunately, procrastination will<br />

once again translate into long days and weeks for the Senate.<br />

Week of September 15, <strong>1986</strong>


E<br />

J E<br />

U S S<br />

F N<br />

D<br />

Attacking Ethanol Hurts Agriculture<br />

<strong>The</strong> recently released U.S. Department of Agriculture<br />

(USDA) report entitled “<strong>The</strong> Fuel Ethanol and Agriculture Economic<br />

AssessmentReport’ is another slap in the face to America’s<br />

farmers. Make no mistake about it, this report is not in tune<br />

with America’s agriculture or our national energy goals.<br />

<strong>The</strong> report is based on faulty assumptionsthat contradict the<br />

goal of increasing demand for agricultural products. It is disappointing<br />

that the USDA intends to disrupt the development of<br />

ethanol in the United States.<br />

<strong>The</strong> USDA report claimsthat ethanol programs are not cost<br />

effective. Not so. A 1985study conducted at Purdue University<br />

found that ethanol programs saved the federal government $227<br />

million.Aiding the developmentof the ethanol industry now will<br />

be worthwhile for the nation in the long run.<br />

<strong>The</strong> report failsto recognizethe valuablecontributionethanol<br />

has made toward lesseningthe United States’dependencyon foreign<br />

oil. Instead the USDA report concludes it would be more<br />

economicalto increasefarmer subsidiesand eliminatethe ethanol<br />

programs.<br />

Farmers don’t want a handout as the USDA report implies;<br />

farmers want a fair price in the market. Undercutting the ethanol<br />

industry by eliminatingprograms would be a step backwards especially<br />

when we are looking for markets to buy agricultural<br />

products.<br />

Ethanol is a bargain for America, but like agriculture, it is<br />

beingchallengedby federalbureaucrats, not by technicalproblems<br />

or environmental concerns.<br />

<strong>The</strong> federal government should promote the unification of<br />

the ethanol and agricultural industries. <strong>The</strong> ethanol industry is<br />

more than just a good market for U.S. farmers, it is a sound investment<br />

for America as a hedge against OPEC domination.<br />

<strong>The</strong> one positiveitem of the report is that it correctly states<br />

that ethanol production raises net farm income. It also correctly<br />

states that ethanol is an excellentoctane enhancer for gasoline.<br />

Both are true statements and carry great weight; yet the USDA<br />

report even tries to disregard these important facts.<br />

<strong>The</strong> basic foundation of our economy is agriculture, but our<br />

country is driven by carburetors. In that sense, agriculture and<br />

ethanol are important ingredients to our national defense.<br />

Week of September 29, <strong>1986</strong>


AmericanGold Coins: <strong>The</strong>y’reHere!<br />

A goal became reality this fall<br />

when the U.S. Mint, authorized by<br />

legislationI introduced, cast the first<br />

“American Eagle” gold coins. Production<br />

of the gold coins in September<br />

culminated more than a year of<br />

work to have the United States mint<br />

the first regular issue gold coins in<br />

more than 50 years.<br />

This effort began with the bill’s<br />

introduction in February 1985,which directed the U.S. Treasury<br />

to mint American gold coins to compete against the then popular<br />

South African Krugerrandgold coins.By December1985,both<br />

Houses of Congress had unanimously approved the bill and the<br />

President had signed it into law.<br />

One very important aspect of this legislation is that profits<br />

from the sale of the American gold coins must be used to reduce<br />

the $2.3 trillion national debt. This mandate specificallyprevents<br />

gold coin profits from being used to further expand federal<br />

spending.<br />

<strong>The</strong> American Eagle gold coins are scheduled to be available<br />

for purchaseby early November,just in time for the holidays.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “American Eagle” gold coins willbe availablein four sizes:<br />

one ounce, one-half ounce, one-quarter ounce and one-tenth<br />

ounce. This array of sizeswill allow Americans of any financial<br />

means to invest in American gold in the denominations they can<br />

afford.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y will be sold through retail outlets and be priced competitivelywith<br />

the Canadian Mapleleaf, ChinesePanda and South<br />

African Krugerrand gold coins.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “American Eagle” coin design represents the values of<br />

our great nation; liberty, family and freedom, <strong>The</strong> coins carry<br />

the AugustusSaint-Gaudens depiction of liberty which appeared<br />

on American $20gold piecesbetween 1907to 1933.<strong>The</strong> reverse<br />

side displays a family of Eagles, symbolic of American family<br />

values,<br />

Foreign coins proved there is a US. market for gold coins.<br />

Americans now spend more than $1 biIlion annually on foreign<br />

gold coins, That is money leaving our economy for investment<br />

in other countries. I introduced the American gold coin bill to<br />

giveAmericans an alternative to foreign gold coins so they could<br />

investin the United States and help our economyby reducingthe<br />

national debt.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sale of American gold coins wilI also heIp reduce the<br />

growingUnited States trade deficit. <strong>The</strong> enormous international<br />

interest shown in the “American Eagle” gold coins signalsthat<br />

they willbe strong contenders in the competitiveworld gold bullion<br />

market and be a bright spot in America’sinternational trade.<br />

Individualswho wish to receiveinformation about the availabilityof<br />

proof coinsand to have their name added to the United<br />

States mint mailing list should write to the U.S. Mint, Account<br />

Maintenance, 10001Aerospace Road, Lanham, MD. 20706.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!