1986 News Releases - The Exon Library
1986 News Releases - The Exon Library
1986 News Releases - The Exon Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>1986</strong> <strong>News</strong> <strong>Releases</strong><br />
JANUARY<br />
001 01-24 Asks USDA to clarify Gramm-Rudman cuts o<br />
002 01-28 Space Shuttle explosion<br />
003 01-29 Richard Lyng nominated to USDA Secretary<br />
FEBRUARY<br />
004 02-04 Cosponsors Trade Expansion bill<br />
005 02-04 State of Union Reaction<br />
006 02-06 Urges USDA not to delay Food Stamp rules<br />
007 02-07 Supports test to televise the Senate cha<br />
008 02-07 Asks Farm Credit to explain interest rat<br />
009 02-11 U.S. Senate-Japan Scholarship winners<br />
010 02-13 Admitted for eye surgery<br />
011 02-19 Close loopholes in imported ethanol laws<br />
012 02-20 Honored by Renewable Fuels Association<br />
013 02-21 Objects to 60% cut in FmHA operating loa<br />
014 02-21 Objects to SCS workers move from Lincoln<br />
015 02-25 Recuperating slowly from eye surgery<br />
016 02-26 <strong>Exon</strong>-Zoro oppose "Old" gas deregulation<br />
017 02-26 Former AP reporter Odell Hanson dies<br />
018 02-27 Boys Town postage stamp<br />
MARCH<br />
019 03-11 Support deferral of ag losses by rural b<br />
020 03-12 Encouraged by FDIC rural bank changes
021 03-12 Pleased by President's Release of FmHA l<br />
022 03-13 Reduce number of soil survey reports pri<br />
023 03-13 Amend to Constitutional Balanced Budget<br />
024 03-13 Success on '87 Ag Budget freeze<br />
025 03-13 DOT $1.7 million grant to Omaha Airport<br />
026 03-14 HUD Homestead Grant to Omaha<br />
027 03-19 <strong>Exon</strong> vote puts sends 87 budget to Senate<br />
028 03-27 Rural Banks Aided by Law Change<br />
APRIL<br />
029 04-02 Praises dropping duty free status of imp<br />
030 04-02 Ex-Zo release requesting Ag-hearing in N<br />
031 04-09 Beef-Dairy Slaughter Resolution Offered<br />
032 04-10 Senate Approves Beef-Dairy Slaughter Res<br />
033 04-10 Corrects Nebr. Traffic Accident Figures<br />
33A 04-12 Effects of Dairy Slaughter 'Devastating'<br />
034 04-15 U.S. Attack on Libya<br />
035 04-16 <strong>Exon</strong> Appointed to Demo Group on Nat'l Se<br />
036 04-17 Disappointed at Allies Reaction to bombi<br />
037 04-18 Bill Introduced on 70 mph Interstate spe<br />
038 04-22 IRS Mileage Record Keeping Cosponsored<br />
039 04-24 Cosponsor Tax Extension for Insolvent Fa<br />
040 04-28 2nd Letter to Sec. of Ag. on Soil Survey<br />
MAY<br />
041 05-01 Action Needed to Move 87 Budget<br />
042 05-01 $5.6 Million Grant for Grand Island VA H<br />
043 05-06 Abandon Soil Service office Move to Texa
044 05-06 Praises Defense Reorganization Bill Pass<br />
045 05-09 Aid Ethanol Industry<br />
046 05-12 National Eye Care Project<br />
047 05-12 1985 Financial Disclosure<br />
048 05-15 Toughen Grain Quality Standards<br />
049 05-19 FAA Study<br />
050 05-20 Opposes Daylight Savings Time Extension<br />
051 05-20 Nebr. & Omaha Mass Transit Grants<br />
052 05-23 <strong>Exon</strong>-Zoro Want Increased Funding for Nor<br />
053 05-30 Supplemental Appropriations Good for Agr<br />
JUNE<br />
054 06-06 <strong>Exon</strong> Old Gas Decontrol Amendment Narrowl<br />
055 06-10 Support IRA Tax Credit Amendment to Tax<br />
056 06-16 Univ of Nebr-Lincoln Physics grant<br />
057 06-17 Air Force Contract to Brunswick Corp. of<br />
058 06-17 USNS CORNHUSKER named assigned to crane<br />
059 06-24 Support Passage of Senate Tax Reform<br />
060 06-24 Sen. Dole Commits to Take up Supplementa<br />
061 06-24 Tax Reform Transitions for Nebr, Histori<br />
062 06-25 Objects to Smithsonian Research Funding<br />
063 06-25 Wheat Poll D.C. Press Conference (<strong>Exon</strong>-H<br />
064 06-25 Dole Says Supplemental to be Considered<br />
065 06-25 <strong>Exon</strong>-Zoro Announce Crete Airport Grant<br />
066 06-26 Lincoln Firm (Hygain) Gets $17.5 million<br />
067 06-27 <strong>Exon</strong> Lauds Approval of Supplemental Appr<br />
068 06-30 Wheat Poll Omaha Press Conference (<strong>Exon</strong>-
JULY<br />
069 07-01 Kiewit Construction Contract for Pipelin<br />
070 07-12 Gold Coin Design<br />
071 07-14 Disaster Aid Requested for Dawes County,<br />
072 07-17 Grain Storage Shortage Letter to Secreta<br />
073 07-22 North Loup Water Project Subcommittee He<br />
074 07-23 Farm Export Enhancement Extended to Chin<br />
075 07-23 President Responds to <strong>Exon</strong> 55 mph Letter<br />
076 07-23 FERC Old Gas Decontrol Letter<br />
077 07-25 Missouri Rec River Funding Increase Requ<br />
078 07-28 Prairie Bend Funding Increase Request<br />
079 07-29 Legislation for Additional Federal Judge<br />
080 07-30 Path Cleared for Advance Deficiency Paym<br />
081 07-31 <strong>Exon</strong> Amend. Approved Mandating Advance D<br />
AUGUST<br />
082 08-01 <strong>Exon</strong> Amend. Approved to Improve Air Traf<br />
083 08-01 Amend for Hay Contributions Approved<br />
084 08-02 Export Enhancement for Soviet Union Reac<br />
085 08-08 Response to Lincoln Journal on Trade Vet<br />
086 08-08 Committee Approves <strong>Exon</strong> Amend on Airport<br />
087 08-11 Senate Approves Military Construction Au<br />
088 08-12 Text of Contra Aid Speech<br />
089 08-14 Committee Approves $27 million in Nebr.<br />
090 08-15 Rumors of Wheat Poll Results<br />
091 08-15 Chadron Disaster Aid Appealed to Preside<br />
092 08-15 Wheat Poll Results Announced
093 08-18 Senate Approves Former President's Bill<br />
094 08-18 Airport grants for Tekamah & Minden<br />
095 08-19 Commonwealth provision included in Tax R<br />
096 08-20 Grant for Defense Logistics Agency in No<br />
097 08-26 Agriculture Committee Hearing Media Advi<br />
SEPTEMBER<br />
098 09-03 HUD Public Housing Loan Authority for Om<br />
099 09-04 React to USDA Ethanol Report<br />
100 09-10 Senators Block USDA move of SCS tech cen<br />
101 09-11 House Subcommittee Approves <strong>Exon</strong> Wildern<br />
102 09-11 React to Neb. Nat. Resources Commission<br />
103 09-12 Senate Ok's FAA Blue Ribbon Commission S<br />
104 09-12 U.S. Marshall & Judicial Nominations Con<br />
105 09-17 Pork-Buster Amendment Announced<br />
106 09-17 Alliance Airport Grant<br />
107 09-17 Votes Against Rehnquist for Chief Justic<br />
108 09-18 Offutt Modernization Contract Award<br />
109 09-19 Reconciliation is Phony<br />
110 09-20 Senate Rejects Pork-Buster Amendment<br />
111 09-22 May Offer Amendment to Increase Speed Li<br />
112 09-22 Unsnarls Wilderness Bill from being Bloc<br />
113 09-23 GATT Trade Talks Letter to President<br />
114 09-24 Senate Approves 55 Speed Limit Amendment<br />
115 09-24 Nebr. Projects in Tax Reform Bill<br />
116 09-25 Cornhusker Army Ammo Plant Cleanup Contr<br />
117 09-27 Votes Against the Tax Reform Bill<br />
118 09-29 HUD Loans to Nebraska
119 09-30 Hydropower Relicensing Accord with House<br />
OCTOBER<br />
120 10-01 Unused <strong>1986</strong> Office Funds Returned<br />
121 10-01 Urges DOT Action on Texas Air Purchase o<br />
122 10-02 Support Override of South Africa Sanctio<br />
123 10-03 Papio & Dam 18 Amend to Con Res Approved<br />
124 10-03 Con. Res. Includes $27 mil in Nebr. Wate<br />
125 10-03 Senate Passes <strong>Exon</strong> Wilderness Bill (S,81<br />
126 10-09 <strong>Exon</strong> Odometer Fraud Bill Sent to Preside<br />
127 10-09 87 Defense Authorization Conf Approves C<br />
128 10-09 Protests Tax Reform Loophole for Texas U<br />
129 10-10 Senate Approves Airport Liability Insura<br />
130 10-16 Physicians Mutual&Commonwealth in Senate<br />
131 10-18 Omnibus Water Bill Gets Final Congressio<br />
132 10-21 President Signs <strong>Exon</strong> Wilderness Bill (S.<br />
133 10-21 Pleased with Popularity of Gold Coin Sal<br />
134 10-28 President Signs <strong>Exon</strong> Odometer Fraud Bill<br />
NOVEMBER<br />
135 11-12 Aviation Subcommittee on Safety & Aviati<br />
136 11-13 <strong>Exon</strong> to Visit China<br />
137 11-13 <strong>Exon</strong> Helps Goodyear Fight Hostile Takeov<br />
138 11-14 React to President Reagan Iran Arms Sale<br />
139 11-14 Letter to U.S. Mint on Gold Coin Distrib<br />
140 11-18 Testimony to House Committee on Goodyear
DECEMBER<br />
141 12-15 Donates Continental Congress Papers Inde<br />
142 12-16 1987 Academy nominations<br />
143 12-17 Donates Continental Papers Index to UN-L<br />
144 12-23 Don't Sell the Power Marketing Administr<br />
145 12-29 Minden & Hall County Receive Airport Gra<br />
146 12-31 Dept of Energy to Notify Gov of nuclear
.<br />
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
~ SJ J Ee an<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
Fo:rRelease, Friday, January 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON ASKS USDA TO CLARIFY GRAMM-RUDMAN IMPACT ON FARM LOANS<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U .S . SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB), has<br />
asl
USS JJ EXON<br />
GRAMM-RUDMAN<br />
IMPACT ON FARM PROGRAM<br />
to explain how Gramm-Rudman will impact the entire farm program.<br />
‘Farmers need to know how Gramm-Rudman will affect them if<br />
they have signed-up for the program and have a contract before<br />
the sequester order takes effect,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Will farmers be<br />
exempted from Gramm-Rudman payment cuts if they have a signed<br />
contract or what other factors might affect their payments?” he<br />
added.<br />
Other questions <strong>Exon</strong> asked the Department to answer include:<br />
-- How reductions in payments would be implemented?<br />
-- <strong>The</strong> timing of deficiency payments?<br />
-- Whether <strong>1986</strong> crop payments will be reduced beyond the<br />
March sequester order?<br />
-- 30 --
J. JAMFS [:XON<br />
i’ N<br />
3 S H B<br />
W<br />
2<br />
A<br />
C<br />
ARMEDSERVICES<br />
f<br />
COMMERCE,SCIENCE, AND<br />
TRANSPORTATION<br />
6UOGET<br />
vo2 F B I<br />
L 6<br />
8 F B<br />
o 6<br />
WASHINGTON, DC 20510<br />
January 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />
2 F f B t<br />
N P 6<br />
<strong>The</strong> Iionorable John R. Block<br />
Secretary of Agriculture<br />
u. s. Departmen L of Agriculture<br />
Wash irlgton,D.C. 20250<br />
I Dear f;ecreLary Block :<br />
rJCIW EhaL the Food Sec uriLy Ack o f 1985 ‘has passed and has<br />
been irnplemented, and the Gramm-Rudman proposa 1 has begun to take<br />
its fu,rther to11 on hard-pressed farmers, it is important that<br />
produc!ers have a fair opportunity to intel1igently plan their<br />
sprin~ plan Ling. At best, there are unanswered quest ions th,nL<br />
demant[ immed iate c Larification.<br />
We are concerned tha k the impact o E the Gramtn-Rudman proposa 1<br />
Otla(~Kicu1.Lure po 1.icy i,:Stl(~ L ye L fuL.1y un(]eKs LOO(I . yi>u<br />
please out 1ine your Depa rtmen t‘s impl.emen tation of the cur ren L<br />
fiseal year $1.3 bi 11ion cut mandated by the Gramm-Rudman<br />
c1men(l111 en(:il 11d p l:3 ns for the 1.987fisca 1 year .<br />
0 A firsL priority for cLarificat ion and hopeful reversa 1 is<br />
yollrDepartment ‘s pub 1ic a t that non recourse 1oans w i11<br />
n<br />
b~:re(lU 4,3 percent because of Gramm-Rudman. One example<br />
given by your Department is that the effect ive <strong>1986</strong> corn loan<br />
figure of $1.92 wi11 be reduced by 4.3 percent to $1.84. We<br />
quest ion and object to this 1ine of calcu Iation. A loan is a<br />
l~i~ n a[idshouId not be a ffected by Gramm-Rudman . You r<br />
ca‘Lulations pre-suppose that a bushel of corn wi11 eventually<br />
se 11 below the loan pr ice of $1’.92. Do you not agree that this<br />
penal izing of the farmer a ful1 4.3 percent of $1.92 is false<br />
arithreetic? In the event o f de fau1t, the U.S. Government has<br />
grain which has value, whereas your calculations to arr iv.ea the<br />
reducti.on figure assume it wou Ld be worth nokh ing.<br />
We also would appreciate an explanation of your Department’s<br />
intentions as to the announcement of sign-up dates for the<br />
commodity programs; which farmers, if any, would be exempt from a<br />
possible March sequester order due to signed contracts or other<br />
factors; how reductions in payments would be implemented; the<br />
timing of deficiency payments; whether <strong>1986</strong> ‘crop payments will be<br />
reduced beyond the March sequester order; and whether the<br />
Department anticipates any change in the historic crop planting<br />
mi)cor production levels due to an imminent sequester.
<strong>The</strong> Honorable John R. Block<br />
Page 2<br />
We urge you to immediately announce the sign-up dates for the<br />
various commodity programs.<br />
This information is crucial to the nation’s agricultural<br />
sector. We hope you will be able to provide us with a timely<br />
response.<br />
With best wishes.<br />
Sincerelyt<br />
/
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
@s~nat(-)r J J E<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
FO:RRELEASE, TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SPACE SHUTTLE EXPLOSION<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said he was<br />
“saddened and shocked” by the explos ion of the Space Shuttle<br />
moments after is was 1aunched.<br />
“This is a trag ic blow to the momentum<br />
of the Space Shuttle<br />
program, but it should not endanger the future of the shuttle<br />
o program, “ <strong>Exon</strong> said . <strong>Exon</strong> is a member of the Senate Commerce<br />
Committee which has jurisdiction over the National Aeronautics<br />
and Space and Administration.<br />
“My prayers<br />
are with the families and friends of the<br />
courageous seven-member crew,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> entire nation<br />
feels the tragic loss of the Shuttle crew,” he added.<br />
At the<br />
time of the Shuttle accident, <strong>Exon</strong> was attending a top secret CIA<br />
briefing.<br />
-
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. ~ J J S E e a n<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Rc?1ease: Wednesday, January 29, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— LYNG NOMINATED FOR SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C . -- “<strong>The</strong> nomination of Richard Lyng to be<br />
the n(:xt Secretary of Agriculture is not surprising. He is wel 1<br />
qual iI:iedand very familiar with the internal operations<br />
of the<br />
Department of Agriculture. He wi11 maintain the status quo and<br />
●<br />
keep<br />
t:heoperation running smoothly. While he may be a good<br />
Administrator, it is important that everyone realize he is being<br />
appointed by President Reagan and will continue the inadequate<br />
farm policies<br />
of this Administration, ” <strong>Exon</strong> said about the<br />
nomination of Richard Lyng to be Secretary of Agriculture.<br />
“Since he will be hired to carryout President Reagan’s farm<br />
policies, I do not expect he will be a strong spokesman for the<br />
family sized farm or ranch operations. I do not anticipate any<br />
improvement or dramatic change in the direction of the Department<br />
of Agriculture because it is still the President who will call<br />
the st~otsand make the decisions affecting the Department of<br />
Agrict~lture,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
-
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
S J Je E n<br />
.<br />
a<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2<br />
A T 2S<br />
For Release Tuesday, February 4, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON ADVOCATES TRADE EXPANS ION LEGISLATION<br />
liASHINGTON, D .C . -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON<br />
(D-NEB) is<br />
cospor~soring 1egis1ation<br />
(S.2033 ) to expand the United States<br />
export:markets by un iting the “smokestack and haystack areas of<br />
the country into one driving export force.“<br />
Elxonsaid the b i11 is unique because<br />
it does not single out<br />
any one industry for protection while sacrificing another for<br />
● retaliation by a foreign competitor. <strong>The</strong> bill proposes to<br />
establish a fund of million at the Export-Import Bank to<br />
countc!r foreign credit subsidies used to undercut U.S. exports on<br />
the wc)rldmarket.<br />
“’International trade is of vital importance to our nation’s<br />
agric~[lture sector since fully one-third<br />
of our food production<br />
is de~roted to exportru <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>The</strong> trade legislation would<br />
“pry clpenforeign markets, fight unfair trade practices and add<br />
an elchment of reciprocity to our trade relationships,m he added.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill emphasizes<br />
increasing exports rather than closing<br />
the American markets. It authorizes the President to negotiate<br />
a<br />
Agreement<br />
to bring foreign agricultural practices under the General<br />
on Trade and Tariffs.<br />
‘This bill signals to the foreign competition that the U.S.<br />
intends to become the world’s best salesman and that the U.S.<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXON<br />
TRADE EXPANSION BILL<br />
government is willing to protect and promote U.S. KightS in the<br />
international marketplace.<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposal includes an incentive program to improve the<br />
quality of export grain. <strong>The</strong> government would offer commodity<br />
payments-in-kind in exchange for improvement in grain quality.<br />
Another provision instructs the Administration to evaluate<br />
the feasibility of selling surplus agricultural commodities in<br />
exchange for local currency in indebted third world countries<br />
where hard currency<br />
supplies are low.<br />
-<br />
COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC2O51O<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J eE<br />
na<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
330 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T S 2<br />
For R~:lease, Tuesday night, February 4, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON C!OMMENTS ON STATE OF UNION<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C.<br />
absolute masterpiece,<br />
-- “<strong>The</strong> President s speech tonight was an<br />
by far the best I have ever heard him give<br />
and hc:has g iven alot of good speeches. It was wel 1 written. It<br />
was f1awlessly del ivered. He is a true pro when it comes to<br />
making speeches. <strong>The</strong>re was not to much nitty-gritty in the<br />
speech though. <strong>The</strong> nitty-gritty starts tomorrow when the Senate<br />
Budget Committee begins hearings on the President’s budget. From<br />
the aclvanced information that we have the President is going to<br />
recommend some devastating cuts for for agriculture which is<br />
going to adversely affect farmers, ranchers and small<br />
businesspeople already in distress in Nebraska. <strong>The</strong> speech was<br />
good, positive and upbeat; now tomorrow we start getting into the<br />
heart of the situation and make the changes we are going to have<br />
to make to spare Nebraska’s economy from what I am very fearful<br />
the President is going to propose in the budget details,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />
said.<br />
‘President Reagan was speaking to the nation tonight and the<br />
natiorl is generally upbeat. That is not the same situation with<br />
the ec:onomy in Nebraska today. While we need some optimism and<br />
optimistic talk we also need some positive action on the part of<br />
the President to alleviate agriculture and ranching and farming<br />
in a way that our economy can be improved in a devastated<br />
Nebraska; where we still have optimism, but we need some help<br />
from E)resident Reagan to make our optimism come true,” he added.<br />
-
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
O JS J Ee an<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T S 2<br />
For Release, Thursday, February 6, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON C’RGES USDA TO STOP DELAYING FOOD STAMP RULES FOR FARMERS<br />
M’ASHINGTON, D .C. -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) Thursday<br />
released a letter urging the Secretary of Agriculture to<br />
implement the new regulations regard ing food stamp appl icat ions<br />
from farmers .<br />
o<br />
“<strong>The</strong> economic conditions facing many of America s farmers<br />
and ranchers are getting progressively worse. Ironically, many<br />
of our farmers and ranchers are forced to seek assistance in<br />
acquiring the processed food products that they have so<br />
efficiently helped produce,~ <strong>Exon</strong> wrote to the Secretary of<br />
Agriculture.<br />
“Current food stamp regulations make it difficult for these<br />
Americans to qualify for food stamps. Section 1509 of the Farm<br />
Bill contains a provision which will correct an inequity in food<br />
stamp regulations as they relate to farmers and ranchers. This<br />
provision would allow farmers who have off-farm jobs and who<br />
apply for food stamps to count their total loss on the farm, as<br />
well as all wages earned off the farm, to arrive at total<br />
income,” <strong>Exon</strong> wrote.<br />
“It is my understanding that implementation of these<br />
regulations is being delayed. I urge you to immediately<br />
implement these provisions and bring relief to this critical<br />
situation. Certainlyr the Department of Agriculture can<br />
understand this situation and is in a position to take prompt<br />
action in accordance with the law which Congress passed over six<br />
weeks ago,” <strong>Exon</strong> concluded in his letter to the Secretary of<br />
Agriculture.<br />
.- 30 --
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J e E ! a n<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T<br />
2S<br />
For Re11ease, Friday, February 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—.— EXON SIJPPORTS TEST OF RADIO & TELEVISION COVERAGE OF SENATE<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C . -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) said<br />
supper ts a test of 1ive gavel-to-gavel rad io broadcast and a<br />
he<br />
clclsed circuit television coverage<br />
of the Senate chamber<br />
prctceecl ings .<br />
“j:t is time the Senate entered<br />
the electron ic age,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />
sa id. “I have always supported proposals for 1ive radio coverage<br />
● of the Senate and the concept of television coverage, but have<br />
expressed concerned<br />
about the cost of implementing gavel-to-gavel<br />
tv coverage,”<br />
he added.<br />
<strong>The</strong> closed circuit television test would be available only<br />
to the Congressional office buildings in Washington, D.C. and the<br />
news media galleries reporting on the Congress. <strong>The</strong> radio<br />
broadczlst would be available on the public frequencies.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> test will allow the Senate<br />
to evaluate what rule<br />
changes will be necessary, so televising the Senate does not<br />
impede the legislative process,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Studies indicate<br />
that the public receives the majority of their news and<br />
informtltion from television. Electronic coverage of the Senate<br />
●<br />
proceedings<br />
can be an asset by providing a direct link between<br />
the Ser~a’teand the public,”<br />
he added.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> pointed out that the Senate is already open to<br />
MOM
USS JJ EXON<br />
TELEVISING THE SENATE<br />
observation<br />
by the general public and that the news media reports<br />
daily on Senate committees and floor actions. He also noted<br />
that, even though Senate chamber action<br />
is not currently<br />
televised, Senate hearings are regularly telecast by C-SPAN, the<br />
group which televises<br />
the House of Representatives.<br />
.- 30 --<br />
COMMllTEEONTHEDUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC20510<br />
OFF!CIALBUSINESS
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J eE<br />
na<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
FOR RE;LEASE, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON ASKS FARM CREDIT TO EXPLAIN INTEREST RATE INCREASE<br />
VIASHINGTON, D .C.<br />
the FzlrmCredit Banks<br />
-- u .s. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) asked<br />
of Omaha about the reported increase in<br />
interest loan rates.<br />
<strong>The</strong> following<br />
is<br />
the text of the letter <strong>Exon</strong> sent to John<br />
●<br />
Harl irlg,president of the Farm Credit Banks of Omaha.<br />
“Dear Mr. Har1ing:”<br />
“I have been advised that since the ba il-out of the<br />
E’armCredit System, the recently merged Production Credit<br />
Association of the Midlands has increased its interest rates<br />
by .15% (fifteen hundredths of one percent ).”<br />
“I am writing to verify that information. If that is<br />
indeed the case, how long do you expect this increase to be<br />
in effect? What is the cause of this increase?”<br />
“During the last several months there has been a<br />
general downward trend in interest rates. Given this<br />
situation, I find this increase difficult to justify.”<br />
“Your prompt response and explanation will be<br />
appreciated.U
J. JAMES EXON<br />
N<br />
3 S H U<br />
~ 2<br />
t<br />
C<br />
ARMEDSERVICES<br />
COMMERCE,SCIENCE, AND<br />
TRANSPORTATION<br />
BUDGET<br />
c<br />
2 F B<br />
I 6<br />
0 F B<br />
O 6<br />
2 F U<br />
N P 6<br />
WASHINGTON, DC 20510<br />
February 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />
Mr. John Harlinq, President<br />
Farm Credit Ban~s of Omaha<br />
South 19th Street<br />
Omiiha,Nebraska 68102<br />
DeiarMr. Har1ing:<br />
I have been advised that since the bail-out of the Farm<br />
Credit System, the recently merged Production Credit Association<br />
of the Midlands has increased its interest rates by .15% (fifteen<br />
hundredths of one percent).<br />
I am writing to verify that information. If that is indeed<br />
Lhe case, how long do you expect this increase to ‘be in effect?<br />
\Wlat is the cause of this increase?<br />
During the last several months there has been a general<br />
●<br />
downward trend in interest rateS. Given this situation, I find<br />
k this increase difficult to justify.<br />
Your prompt response and explanation will be appreciated.<br />
ed States<br />
Senator
330 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T S 2<br />
For Release ~ Tuesday, February 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON ANNOUNCES U.S. SENATE-JAPAN SCHOLARSHIP WINNER<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) announced<br />
today that Sara E. Adkins of Laurel, Nebraska, has been selected<br />
to pa~ticipate in the U.S. Senate - Japanese Youth Exchange<br />
Program.<br />
f;ara is a junior at Laurel-Concord Public Schools at Laurel,<br />
Nebraska. As a participant Sara is one of two Nebraska youths<br />
who will receive a full scholarship to spend two months this<br />
summer with a host family in Japan. <strong>The</strong> other Nebraska winner is<br />
17-year-old Michael Moberg of Papillion, who was selected by<br />
Senator Ed Zorinsky (D-NEB).<br />
‘l!heU.S. Senate – Japan Scholarship is awarded annually to<br />
two st:udents from each state. As scholarship winners, the two<br />
Nebraska students will first travel to Washington, D.C. to meet<br />
with Nebraska’s U.S. Senators Jim <strong>Exon</strong> and Ed Zorinsky and<br />
Japanese Embassy officials. While in the nation’s capital, the<br />
participants will attend an orientation on the Japanese language<br />
and c~llture before traveling to Japan.<br />
f;ara is a member of the National Honor Society and<br />
participates in many student activities. She is a state
USS JJ EXON<br />
U.S. SENATE JAPAN SCHOLARSHIP WINNERS<br />
medalist in extemporaneous speech contests, co-editor of the<br />
student annual, and a member of the student council. In addition<br />
Sara is a varsity cheerleader, a starter on the school’s’varsity<br />
volleyball and basketball teams, and active in vocal and<br />
instrumental music. She has been very active in 4-I1 for nine<br />
years and also in community and church projects.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Senate - Japan Scholarship progzam was established in<br />
1981 to increase understanding and awareness between United<br />
States and Japan. <strong>The</strong> program is administered by Youth for<br />
Understanding, a non-profit international exchange student<br />
organization.<br />
Senator <strong>Exon</strong> congratulated both students and said Sara and<br />
Michael will do an excellent job representating Nebraska during<br />
their visit to Japan. ‘I have complete confidence that Sara and<br />
Michael will proudly represent Nebraska and our country in this<br />
●<br />
important exchange prog~am,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
-<br />
>
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
~ SJ J Ee an<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T<br />
2S<br />
For R=lease, Thursday, February 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON E;NTERS HOSPITAL FOR EYE SURGERY<br />
——<br />
LINCOLN , NEBR. -- U.S. Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong> checked into<br />
Method ist Hospital in Omaha Thursday for repair surgery to his<br />
left eye.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said doctors had d iscovered<br />
a smal1 local ized tear on<br />
the side of his left retina.<br />
● 1 He said it was not an emergency , but he wanted to have it<br />
corrected while at home.<br />
Dr. John Pemberton will repair the tissue Thursday<br />
afternoon, and the Senator is expected to leave the hospital this<br />
weekend. <strong>Exon</strong> said the doctor anticipated no problems, and he is<br />
expected to return to his Washington, D.C. duties sometime next<br />
week after a few days of recuperation<br />
at his Lincoln home.<br />
-.
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J e E ! a n<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
I<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A ~ T 2 ~<br />
, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY<br />
EXON WliNTS TO CLOSE LOOPHOLES IN IMPORTED ETHANOL LAWS<br />
LI:NCOLN, NEBR. .- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is cosponsoring<br />
1egislat ion (S.2051) to close loopholes which fuel ethanol importers<br />
have used to avoid U.S. tariffs.<br />
“llthanol imports have ducked u.S. tariffs because of loopholes in<br />
the 1aws,” <strong>Exon</strong> said, who has been an advocate for developing U.S.<br />
ethano1.plants . Under current law, ethanol imports intended for use<br />
● as fuel.must pay a Congressionally mandated 60-cent per gallon<br />
tariff. Congress levied the import tariff to promote the domestic<br />
ethanol industry and to offset fuel tax incentives intended for<br />
domestically produced ethanol.<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislation is designed to close three major loopholes in the<br />
law by making all types of imported ethanol subject to the 60-cent per<br />
gallon tariff. Current law permits an importer three years, after<br />
importation, to declare the use of the ethanol before paying the<br />
tariff if it is used for fuel purposes. Under S.2051, the tariff<br />
would be collected at the time of importation and be refunded upon<br />
proof that the ethanol<br />
is not being used for fuel purposes.<br />
o<br />
eligibility<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill also clarifies the Caribbean Basin Intiative (CBI)<br />
rules to prevent ethanol from being shipped through<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXON<br />
—— BILL TO CLOSE ETHANOL IMPORT LOOPHOLES —<br />
Caribbean nations and then upgraded to fuel quality to avoid the U.S.<br />
tariffs. Under the current interpretation of the CBI, ethanol from<br />
non..CBInations can be upgraded in CBI countries to fuel quality and<br />
then imported tariff-free into the U.S. In addition, the bill would<br />
extend the 60-cent tariff to include imported fuels that are blended<br />
with ethanol.<br />
“Some importers are simply laundering ethanol fuels through the<br />
Caribbean to avoid the U.S. tariffs,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> federal ethanol<br />
import laws are as important to agriculture as the domestic ethanol<br />
inhustry and should be tightened up and enforced. Ethanol is an<br />
expanding agricultural market,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
In a related matter, <strong>Exon</strong> said he was pleased the U.S. Trade<br />
Representative’s office has announced it will review the practice of<br />
blending ethanol imports with chemicals to avoid U.S. tariffs. <strong>Exon</strong>,<br />
was one of nine Senators who earlier this month requested U.S. Trade<br />
Representative Clayton Yeutter to investigate this p~actice of<br />
blending ethanol to avoid the Congressionally mandated 60-cent per<br />
gallon<br />
tariff.<br />
~~b,all<br />
~nft~ $tOttS %aott<br />
COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS<br />
--30--
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
o SJ J eE<br />
an<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
Fo:rRelease, Thursday, February 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON HONORED BY RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION<br />
——<br />
WASHINGTON, D .C. -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEBR) was<br />
honored Wednesday evening by the Renewable Fuels Association for<br />
his leadership in the promotion of ethanol.<br />
<strong>The</strong> national associat ion gave <strong>Exon</strong> the “Award for<br />
Outstand ing Contr ibutions to the Fuel Ethanol Industry. ”<br />
Receiving the award on <strong>Exon</strong>’s behalf was Ralph O’Connor of the<br />
Nebraska Gasohol Commission. <strong>Exon</strong> was recuperating from eye<br />
surgery at his home in Lincoln, Nebraska and could not attend the<br />
ceremony.<br />
Eric Vaughn, President of the Renewable Fuels Association,<br />
said <strong>Exon</strong> was selected to receive the award because of his<br />
“commitment to the domestic fuel ethanol industry” and<br />
“leadership on numerous legislative issues of importance to the<br />
industry.~<br />
“As a direct result of your (Senator <strong>Exon</strong>’s) support, the<br />
domestic ethanol industry, in 1985, will produce more than 625<br />
million gallons of ethanol, consuming over 240 million bushels of<br />
co:~n, and adding over $900 million to farm incomern Vaughn said<br />
in a letter<br />
to <strong>Exon</strong>.<br />
-- 30 --
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J e E ! a n<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
—.<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T S 2<br />
For Release, Fr iday, February 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON SAYS 60% CUT OF FmHA OPERATING LOANS ADDS TO CREDIT DROUGHT<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U .S . SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) Friday said<br />
the Admini strat ion is scheduling drastic reduct ions in lending to<br />
Nel~raska s most hard pressed<br />
farm and ranch operations.<br />
“Nearly sixty percent of the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA)<br />
operating loan programs for Nebraska are being eliminated during the<br />
.)<br />
worst farm depression since the 1930s, ” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Last year the Nebraska FmHA office made direct operating loans<br />
totaling $141,840,820. This year the Administration has allocated<br />
$55,109,000 to Nebraska for direct loans, <strong>Exon</strong> said, but only $21<br />
million<br />
is left to last through the end of the year.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said he will be contacting Assistant Agriculture Secretary<br />
Frank Naylor about how the Administration’s deep reductions are<br />
ma’king the depression in agriculture worse. “Assistant Secretary<br />
Naylor needs to know there is a credit drought which will force many<br />
farmers out of business this year,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Last year the FmHA guaranteed $155,092,880 in operating loans<br />
co]nmercial banks made to Nebraska farmers. This year the allocation<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXON<br />
FmHA LOANS CUT BY 60 PERCENT<br />
is only $62,864,000, of which only $28 million is remaining for the<br />
a<br />
rest of the year.<br />
“This lack of credit is going to drive many credit-worthy<br />
farmers out of business,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Even the best run farm<br />
operations need credit, but with the Administration making such<br />
radical reductions<br />
in the direct loans and loan guarantees many<br />
family farm operat: ons will have no place<br />
to turn,” he added.<br />
--30--<br />
~ 3<br />
COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC 20S10<br />
offl~ BUSINESS
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
m SJ J eE<br />
n<br />
a<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release, Friday, February 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON CALLS MOVE OF SCS WORKERS BUREAUCRATIC BUMBLE<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON labeled the announced<br />
plans to move the Midwest Technical Service Center of the Soil<br />
Conservation Serv ice (SCS) office to Fort Worth, Texas as a<br />
11bu reaucratic bumble at best. “<br />
Wilson Scaling, Chief of the Soil Conservation Service, has<br />
recommended plans to move the 150 employees in Lincoln, many of them<br />
highly skilled technicians, to Fort Worth this yearO Scaling is from<br />
Texas and obviously wants all the SCS offices located in Texas, <strong>Exon</strong><br />
noted.<br />
“Evidently Mr. Scaling and the Administration compare size with<br />
efficiency, which I very much question, as they proceed with plans to<br />
move the offices in Nebraska, Oregon and Pennsylvania<br />
said.<br />
to Texas,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
If one location is most efficient, then Nebraska<br />
would be the<br />
ideal choice to serve the entire nation. It is centrally located and<br />
has good air service, <strong>Exon</strong> said. “We are accessible to much of the<br />
central region by ground transportation with the benefits of<br />
Interstate<br />
80,” he added.<br />
“I will be asking for answers on cost comparisons; such as<br />
MO~
USS JJ EXON<br />
SCS OFFICE CLOSING<br />
federal subsistence rates in Fort Worth at $75 per day versus $58 per<br />
day in Lincoln, the cost of the new office space in Fort Worth versus<br />
the vast amount of available federal office space in Lincoln and the<br />
cost of the mover”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“This move is a grave injustice to the midwest states who need<br />
the highly skilled technical services provided and also to the 150<br />
employees who will either be terminated or forced ko relocate,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />
said.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said he will urge the U.S. Department<br />
of Agriculture<br />
officials in Washington, D.C. to reject the SCS merger so the office<br />
will remain in Lincoln.<br />
-<br />
COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J e E : a n<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release, Tuesday, February 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON RECUPERATING FOR REMAINDER OF WEEK<br />
—<br />
WASHINGTON , D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON S doctors have<br />
suggested he not return to his ful1, normal duties in Washington,<br />
D.C. for the balance<br />
of the current week.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> underwent eye surgery<br />
to repair a tear in his left<br />
●’<br />
rekina on February 13th in Omaha. <strong>The</strong> Senator ‘s Omaha physician<br />
and his Washington, D.C. specialist said the operation was<br />
successful, but that delays in the return of normal internal eye<br />
pressure is delaying <strong>Exon</strong>’s return to his normally full schedule<br />
of activities.<br />
T“heSenator<br />
is in daily contact with his office by telephone<br />
from his Washington, D.C. residence. He is reportedly in good<br />
spirits and anxious to return to his full working<br />
routine.<br />
-
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
●S J Je E n<br />
a<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release Wednesday, February 26, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON & ZORINSKY OPPOSE DEREGULATION OF “OLD” NATURAL GAS PRICES<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C . -- Nebraska U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON and<br />
ED ZOE.INSKY are strongly objecting to the Department of Energys<br />
proposal that would more than triple the price of “old” natural<br />
gas.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Department of Energy (DOE) “proposal wil 1 more than<br />
triple the cost of approximately two-thirds of the natural gas<br />
● consumed in the western three-fourths of Nebraska, ” the Senators<br />
sa id. “For this major increase in cost the DOE proposal provides<br />
absolutely no benefits to consumer s,” they added.<br />
— “Old” natural<br />
gas<br />
is natural gas which was contracted before1978.<br />
In a joint statement to the Federal Energy Regulatory<br />
Commission (FERC) the Nebraska Senators said the DOE proposal<br />
could increase the price to $ per Thousand Cubic Feet (mcf).<br />
Old gas is currently selling for as low as 74-cents per mcf.<br />
Under the Natural Gas Policy Act of<br />
(NPGA), ‘old” gas was<br />
protecred<br />
and its price would not be deregulated.<br />
‘!rheDOE proposal will unnecessarily and unlawfully raise<br />
the cost of natural gas to consumers in Nebraska,w the Senators<br />
o<br />
said. <strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky pointed out that nearly percent of<br />
Nebraska’s homes are heated with natural gas and over percent<br />
MORE
USS EXON & ZORINSKY<br />
OPPOSING DEREGULATION OF “OLD” NATURAL GAS<br />
of the state’s<br />
irrigation pumps are powered with either natural<br />
●<br />
gas or propane:<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> an~.Zorinsky said the DOE should address the industry<br />
problem of natural gas supply contract renegotiations between the<br />
pipeline companies and the gas producers. ‘<strong>The</strong>re is no mechanism<br />
in the DOE proposal to attack the real problems facing the<br />
industry renegotiation of high cost contracts or take-or-pay<br />
contracts,” the Senators said. Take-or-pay contracts require a<br />
pipeline company to take natural gas contracted for or pay for it<br />
even though it may not be used.<br />
-<br />
COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC 26510<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS<br />
-.
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J e E n a .<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release, Wednesday, February 26, <strong>1986</strong><br />
.— OD13LL HANSON DIES<br />
WASHINGTON , D.C. -- “Odel1 Hanson was truly one of the<br />
most g ifted reporters who covered the Nebraska scene in the 1ast<br />
few decades . He wrote with accuracy and integrity. He never<br />
alnowed personal opinion to creep into any of the stories he<br />
●<br />
wrote. He wrote the facts; pure and unembellished . Odel 1 Hanson<br />
was a ]nodel reporter that every journalism student should<br />
emu1ate. Odell Hanson will be missed. His integrity will stand<br />
as a monument<br />
to his memory, ” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Odell Hanson was the Lincoln Bureau Chief<br />
for AP from<br />
1 He died of cancer this morning.<br />
-
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release, Thursday, February 27, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— STAMP TO HONOR BOYS TOWN<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Postal Service has informed<br />
Us. SENATOR JIM EXON of its decision to issue a stamp to honor<br />
Bays Town in Omaha.<br />
13xonhas been working for nearly two years encouraging the<br />
Postal Service to issue a stamp honoring Boys Town. <strong>The</strong> stamp<br />
would commemorate the IOOth anniversary of the birth of<br />
● Father Edward J. Flanagan who founded Boys Town.<br />
~?hestamp is expected to be a regular issue four-cent<br />
postage stamp issued as part of the Great American Series. It is<br />
expected to be issued by the Postal Service on July and<br />
carry the image of Father Flanagan.<br />
-
O E Z d w<br />
N e b r<br />
. — —<br />
SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />
COntaCt:Art Jaeger<br />
l“Jashi~ton, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />
FOR I!@!~IA!rERELEASE:Wrch 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />
..<br />
SENATEPASSESZORINSKYBILL ON EXPANDING=RON<br />
STATE PARK<br />
Washing’:on, D.C............<strong>The</strong> Senatehas passed legislationintroducedby Senator<br />
Mward ZoriI~sky(D.-Neb.) transferring<br />
acres of adjacentfederalforestland to<br />
ChadronSta”zePark for develo~ent as a campground.<br />
Zorinsk:fsaid the bill, which passedwithouta dissentingvote Mrch<br />
is the only<br />
solutionto a long-statiingproblm of inadequatecampingfacilitiesat the park.<br />
●<br />
SenatorJ. James<strong>Exon</strong> (D.-Neb.) is a cosponsorof the measure,which still needsHouse<br />
approval.<br />
“~adro]~State Park attractssme 2 visitorsa year,” Zorinskysaid, “but it has<br />
no campgroulti ad<br />
no lafi suitablefor Campgroutidevelo~ent.”<br />
Undertl~eZorinsky-<strong>Exon</strong>bill, acreswould be transferredfra the Nebraska<br />
NationalForestto the NebraskaGame and Parksmission<br />
for only the administrative<br />
costsof conveyance,includingthe cost of appraisingand surveyingthe land.<br />
All dev=lopent, such as campingfacilitiesand nature trails,would b<br />
paid for by<br />
the state.<br />
‘Transferof the landwould greatlyenhancepublicuse of ChadronState Park and we<br />
simplyhave no otheralternativefor developingcampingfacilitestheref”Zorinskysaid.<br />
—
uo~o $$enator<br />
● ) E Z<br />
N e b r<br />
SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />
W D 2<br />
Contact:Art Jaeger<br />
(202)224-6551<br />
I’mIATE ~LEASE: mrch 7, <strong>1986</strong><br />
ZORINSKY,EXON UR~<br />
NAYLORTO WE<br />
SUR=US GRAINAVAILABLEFOR ~~NOL<br />
Washington,D.C............NebraskaSenatorsEdwardZorinskyand<br />
J. James<strong>Exon</strong> have<br />
urgedActingAgricultureSecretaryFrankW. NaylorJr. to make surplusgovernmentgrain<br />
availablefreeor at reducedcost for processi~ intoethanol.<br />
Irla letter,the two senatorsdrew Naylor’sattentionto Zorinsky-sponsored language<br />
in the 1985 farmbill allowingUSDA to make the grain availablefrcm surplusCcnnncdity<br />
Credit,Cor]~rationstocks.<br />
●)<br />
‘<strong>The</strong>reis great interestin thisprovisionin our hae<br />
Stateof Nebraskaand elsewhere<br />
in themidwest,where overwhelmingsurplusesand policiesembodiedin the farmbill<br />
cunbineto continuethe downwardspiralof c~odity prices,~Zorinskyad <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y offeredto assistUSDA in formulatin guidelinesfor the distributionof grain<br />
for ethanoland asked for a reporton progressmade in this area to date.<br />
“In an effortto providesane relieffrun the econmic turmoilking experiencedby<br />
midwesternagriculture,”the senatorssaid, ‘we urge you to exerciseyour authorityin<br />
pursuingthismatterat your earliestpossibleconvenience.n<br />
m
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J eE<br />
na<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
FOICRelease, Tuesday, March 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—.-—— EXON URGES ACTION TO PREVENT MORE RURAL BANK FAILURES<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) Tuesday urged<br />
quick<br />
Senate act ion to reverse the increasing number of farm<br />
fo]:eclosures and bank fai1ures in rural America.<br />
Test ifying before the Senate Banking Committee, Senator <strong>Exon</strong><br />
ur
USS JJ EXON<br />
RURAL BANKS<br />
are supposedly too large to fail.” <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator said the<br />
failure of rural banks is as detrimental to farm communities as the<br />
failure of a multi-national<br />
bank could be to the national banking<br />
system.<br />
‘It is important that the government make every effort to keep<br />
families on their farms,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “As President Reagan said in his<br />
State of the Union speech, ‘Farmers must not be abandoned with<br />
problems they did not create and cannot control. ’”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said hs will continue<br />
to push the federal ~egulatory<br />
agencies and the Senate Banking Committee for action to aid rural<br />
America.<br />
-<br />
COMM17TEEONTHEBUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />
o~lCIAl BUSINESS
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. S J J ( E : a n<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release, Wednesday, March 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON I’LEASEDBY RELEASE OF FMHA MONEY<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C. -- Nebraska farm state U.S. Senator Jim<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> (D-NEB) said Wednesday he was pleased that the President had<br />
annourlced an add itional $750 mi11 ion in Farmers<br />
Home<br />
Adm inistrat ion (FmHA) loan funds.<br />
E;xonwas the first member of the Congress to publicly direct<br />
attent:ion to the shortage of FmHA loan funds .<br />
●’ ‘“Idon’t care who gets the publicity, the problem has been<br />
partially<br />
solved, ” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
--30--
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. S J J e E n<br />
a<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
330 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release, Wednesday, March 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON ENCOURAGED BY FDIC CHANGES<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB), who<br />
testif’ied before the Senate Banking Committee Tuesday advocating<br />
necess;ary changes<br />
in bank 1aws to aid the ai1ing agricu1tura1<br />
economy, said he was “encouraged by subsequently announced<br />
changes by federal bank regulator s.”<br />
E’ederal bank regulators announced they would ease pressure<br />
on rural banks by permitting them to reduce cash reserves and<br />
take special bookkeeping<br />
techniques.<br />
E:xon,who has held several meetings<br />
with top Federal<br />
Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and Federal Reserve Board<br />
officials said, “It wasn’t easy, but our efforts finally paid<br />
off. I wish the regulators would have reacted much earlier as we<br />
requested.”<br />
E;xon,one of the Senate’s leading advocates of relief for<br />
the h~lrting rural economy said further action was necessary and<br />
that corrective legislation he was sponsoring would come out of<br />
the S6!nateBanking Committee<br />
in the near future.<br />
-
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
S J e J E] al<br />
.)<br />
N’ewsRelease<br />
330 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
I r Release , Thursday, March 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—. EXON WANTS USDA TO CUTBACK ON SOIL SURVEY PUBLICATIONS<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has called on<br />
the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to stop wasting money by<br />
printing excess ive numbers of county soil survey reports .<br />
<strong>Exon</strong>, a farm state leader , said the USDA<br />
is wasting money each<br />
time a county soil survey report is done by printing excessive copies<br />
for the USDA and for Members<br />
of Congress.<br />
o <strong>Exon</strong> said a typical example of this wasteful process is the case<br />
of Cedar County, Nebraska. In that case the Department of Agriculture<br />
printed 250 copies for each U.S. Senator, 1000 for the Congressman, 75<br />
for the University,<br />
3000 for the USDA and 1000 for Cedar County.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are about 11,700 residents of Cedar County. ‘That means there<br />
is a supply of one copy for every two people in the county,n <strong>Exon</strong><br />
said.<br />
“Members of Congress are notified that these soil reports are<br />
available for them to distribute. I must assume it is supposedly a<br />
public relations tool. It is an expense that taxpayers would not<br />
apprc)ve. Members of Congress only need a few copies for reference and<br />
to handle any requests,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“I could pick 250 names out of the telephone book and mail out<br />
the reports, but why waste the taxpayers money,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “I cannot<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXON<br />
SOIL SURVEY REPORTS<br />
see how a member of the Senate or House could find a demand for 1000<br />
cop ies. <strong>The</strong> government time and expense of printing these excessive<br />
reports would be ‘better spent on the farm programs.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nebraska<br />
Senator said under the law the Secretary of<br />
Agriculture decides how many copies of the reports are printed. <strong>Exon</strong><br />
has written to the Secretary of Agriculture Richard Lyng urging him to<br />
reduce<br />
the number of copies as one of his first official acts.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> money saved from pri’nting these unnecessary extras will add<br />
up when you consider it is being done for nearly every county in the<br />
nation,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>The</strong>re are as many as 900 reports left to be<br />
completed nationwide. <strong>The</strong> savings could reduce the printing total by<br />
as much as 1,350,000 copies.<br />
In his letter, <strong>Exon</strong> compared the overprinting of soil reports to●<br />
the $400 hammers purchased by the Pentagon. He also urged Lyng to<br />
reduce the number which USDA prints<br />
for itself saying ‘I suspect that<br />
many of these copies simply gather dust on a shelf.n<br />
--30--<br />
COMMllTEEONTHE EUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC 2(J51O<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release, Thursday, March 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON STRENGTHENS BALANCED BUDGET CONSITITUTIONAL AMENDMENT<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Late Wednesday night, U.S. SENATOR JIM<br />
EXON (D-NEB) engineered the U.S. Senate’s unanimous approval of<br />
an amendment to the Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment<br />
which would require the President to submit a balanced budget to<br />
Congress.<br />
m<br />
“I’m a cosponsor of the Balanced Budget Constitutional<br />
Amendment; however, the Senate Judiciary Committee dropped all<br />
reference to the President and the Executive Branch from the<br />
original billr~ <strong>Exon</strong> said. “By deleting all references to the<br />
president, the Judiciary Committee significantly weakened this<br />
mu(ch needed Constitutional mandate,~ he added.<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposal, offered by Senators <strong>Exon</strong> and Howard Metzenbaum<br />
(D-OH), requires the President to submit an annual balanced<br />
federal budget to Congress or provide an alternate budget with a<br />
written explanation stating why the budget should not be<br />
balanced.<br />
“As a former Governor. who prepared balanced budgets for our<br />
state, I know it is important that the Chief Executive submit a<br />
o<br />
‘balanced budget to the legislative branch to demonstrate fiscally<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXON<br />
AMENDME:iT TO BALANCED BUDGET CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT<br />
responsible leadership and to outline the Administration’s<br />
spending priorities,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. ‘Congress will always hold the<br />
purse strings of the federal government. This change will make<br />
future Presidents more accountable by requiring them to fully<br />
participate in making the difficult choices necessary to balance<br />
a budget,n he added,<br />
<strong>The</strong> Gramrn-Rudman law contains a similar provision requiring<br />
the President to submit annual federal budgets which do not<br />
exceed mandated budget deficit<br />
levels.<br />
-- 30 --<br />
COMMllTEEONTHEBUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC 2G51O<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release, Thursday, March 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—<br />
EXI~NMOVES TO pROTECT AG BUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- “<strong>The</strong> good news for the future of<br />
agriculture<br />
programs<br />
today is that I have been successful,<br />
thus<br />
far, in getting<br />
near<br />
unanimous agreement in the Senate Budget<br />
Committee to make no<br />
further cuts in agriculture programs,<br />
including agriculture extension services, for the next year of<br />
the budget,” <strong>Exon</strong> said Thursday in his weekly conference call<br />
with Nebraska broadcasters.<br />
‘Even Budget Committeeman Chairman Pete Domenici’s (R-NM)<br />
formal presentation to the Budget Committee today is in line with<br />
my suggestions of a freeze. This essentially accomplishes my<br />
long held view that we reduce the annual budget deficit by first<br />
stopping increases in the budget,” <strong>Exon</strong> said, who is a member of<br />
the Senate Budget Committee.<br />
‘Our bipartisan group in the Senate committee has been<br />
working and we have been very successful in coming up with a<br />
budget proposal that I believe will be realistic; it will be<br />
tough, but it will be one that I think will be accepted next week<br />
by the Budget Committee,n<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
--30--
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J eE<br />
na<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Re!lease, Thursday, March 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />
$1.7 MILLION GRANT TO EPPLY AIRPORT<br />
llASHINGTON, D .C . -- U .S . SENATOR JIM EXON announced today<br />
that t:heDepartment<br />
of Transportat ion has approved his request<br />
for arladditional $1.7 mil 1ion grant for Epply Airfield in Omaha.<br />
<strong>The</strong> funds will be used to continue the upgrading and<br />
●<br />
previclusly<br />
real i$~nmentof the drainage system of the airfield. Epply had<br />
been awarded $4 mil 1ion to begin the project.<br />
“It was crucial that the grant was approved by Thursday to<br />
allow Epply Airfield<br />
to accept a very favorable bid to continue<br />
the wclrk,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
E)artsof the extensive drainage system must be relocated due<br />
to the’expansion of the airport terminal. <strong>The</strong> work will take<br />
approximately two years to complete at a total cost of about $10<br />
millicn.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong>, who is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Aviation<br />
Subcommittee, has been working closely with the U.S.<br />
Transportation Department to finalize the grant.<br />
-
Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
}<br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
HUD<br />
Release, Friday, March 14, <strong>1986</strong><br />
HOMESTEAD GRANT TO OMAHA<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON Z<br />
a t H D<br />
D a O $<br />
H<br />
g p a i<br />
p e t<br />
h a N O<br />
U H a n p<br />
r<br />
e i d<br />
u a p o o<br />
p<br />
r o p<br />
t<br />
h a m a q<br />
h b p h<br />
r h s p<br />
e<br />
-
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
~ JS J Ee an<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Release, Thursday, March 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON WAS KEy VOTE IN APpROVING BUDGET IN COMMITTEE<br />
.<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S key vote in<br />
the Senate Budget Committee Wednesday afternoon sent the<br />
bipartisan budget compromise to the Senate floor.<br />
E~xonsaid tough cuts had to be made to get the budget<br />
deficit reduced and they “were accomplished by a unique<br />
bipartisan action.n<br />
o<br />
Twelve votes are required for approval by the 22 member<br />
committee. <strong>Exon</strong> was the twelfth vote recorded which assured<br />
appro~ral of the budget by the committee. <strong>The</strong> measure carried 13<br />
to 9.<br />
~!heNebraska Democrat had been active in a series of behind<br />
the scenes meetings over the past several weeks that led to the<br />
approved compromise.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said agricultural programs in general faired very well<br />
with no significant reductions in the budget document. <strong>Exon</strong> was<br />
instrumental in preventing cuts in the Rural Electrification<br />
Administration, Rural Telephone Bank, agricultural research and<br />
extension services. Federal aid for school districts impacted by<br />
milit:~ry and indian reservations was protected as was basic<br />
health and educational programs.<br />
have been encouraging a budget freeze approach to federal<br />
spending for years. It finally came to pass,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> measure meets the goal of reducing the budget deficit to<br />
$144 billion in the next fiscal year. <strong>The</strong> committee approved a<br />
combination of $20.2 billion in spending reductions and $12.6<br />
billion in revenues above those recommended by President Reagan.<br />
“This is a budget<br />
that should fly,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
o --30--
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
S J e J E] al<br />
.<br />
N’ewsRelease<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Relez~se, Thursday, March 27, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON SUP1?ORTSBANK LAW CHANGES FOR RURAL BANKS<br />
WASHINGTON, D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is c<br />
i 2 e p r f<br />
b ] c p .<br />
i w a o<br />
r i 1 r fi y<br />
p n b e p f<br />
● )<br />
f v c r a<br />
d f p<br />
d<br />
a fi t a p<br />
p r a ” i 1<br />
not so1vt:al1 the problems facing rura1 1enders and<br />
beg in.to ease some of the pressure in agriculture, ”<br />
borrowers, but it will<br />
he added.<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislation would allow agricultural banks<br />
to restructure<br />
debts<br />
by either reducing interest rates, extension of the<br />
maturity<br />
date,<br />
forgiven~:ss of debt, transfer of property or a comb: nation of these<br />
optiofns. It would also permit rural lenders to not<br />
automatically<br />
classify<br />
renegoti?~ted loans as “nonperforming” or troubled loans.<br />
“Congress needs to initiate positive<br />
action like this to try to stall<br />
the incr{:asingnumber of bank failures and subsequent foreclosures on<br />
o farms, rt~nchesand rural businesses,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
-
U ! $ . e n aS<br />
t o<br />
●<br />
E Z<br />
N e b r<br />
SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />
Contact:Art Jaeger<br />
Wash:ingtcn, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />
FOR I-’IATE RELEASE:~~rch 28, <strong>1986</strong><br />
ZORINSKY,EXON ~IL APPROVALOF $47.5YILLIONFOR ~~<br />
AQUIFER<br />
!tashington, D.C............Senators~ward Zorinsky(D.-*b. ) ati J. James<strong>Exon</strong> (D.-<br />
Neb.:1hailedSenatepassage%rch 26 of legislationauthorizing$47.5millionover five<br />
y<br />
to reducedepletionof the OgallalaAquifer.<br />
l!massiveundergroundreservoir,the OgallalaAquiferis a key sourceof irrigation<br />
wate]:for Nebraskaad fiveotherHigh Plainsstates. Two yearsago, Congressauthorized<br />
●1 up to 21 f~eral demonstrationprojectsto test varioustechniquesfor artificially<br />
replenishi~such undergroundwater su~lies.<br />
<strong>The</strong> rrostrecentSenatelegislationauthorizes$27.5 millionfor researchgrantsto<br />
educationalinstitutionsati stategovertnnentsin the High plainsregion,Z<br />
m<br />
s S a o t w p m w<br />
a r i t e<br />
o<br />
millionmore wouldbe allocatedto qualifyingfarmersfor buildi~ projects<br />
thatdemonstratenew technologiesfor such thingsas water-efficientirrigation,soil and<br />
watel:conservationmanag~t<br />
and the growingand marketingof water-efficientcrops.<br />
<strong>The</strong> senatorssaid the researchand demonstrationprojectsare crucialto reversingthe<br />
gradualdepletionof the OgallalaAquifer,which su~rts<br />
more than 170,000irrigation<br />
wells in Nebraska,Colorado,Kansas,New %xico, Oklahomaand Texas.<br />
Estimatesare the aquiferis beingoverdrawnby more than 3 millionacre-feetof water<br />
o<br />
annu~~lly,they said.
2<br />
Authorizationfor the five-yearresearchand demonstrationprojecteffortwas includ<br />
in the firstgeneralwaterprojects p S y<br />
authorizd in the $11.1billionbill, the senatorssaid, is $50.5millionto<br />
restoreati preserveaquaticareasalongthe MissouriRiver in Nebraska,Iowa,Kansasand<br />
‘~issouri.<br />
- for the proj=t stemsfrombank stabilizationand navigationconstructionkiq<br />
done alongthe river,Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Houseversionof the waterprojectsbill,passedlast fall,does not includethe<br />
aquiferproject.<br />
Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> expressedthe hope that the Nebraskaprovisionsof both billswill<br />
be retainedin the House-Senateconference.<br />
9<br />
— 30 --<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C, 20510<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
~is~nlator J E<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
I Fcr R(>lease,Wednesday, Apr i1 2,.<strong>1986</strong><br />
——.——. EXON 1~RAISES ELIMINATING DUTY FREE STATUS TO ETHANOL IMPORTS<br />
I.INCOLN, NEBR . -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D -NEB) Wednesday<br />
pra is(>dPresident Reagan s decision to follow the adv ice of Congress<br />
and e~.iminate the duty free pr ivi1eges for Bra zi1ian ethano 1.<br />
<strong>The</strong> duty<br />
free status al1owed Brazi1ian ethanol<br />
to unfairly compete with domestic<br />
●<br />
I<br />
gasohc)l.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> importers of Brazilian ethanol have been abusing the law at<br />
the expense of American farmers,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Stopping the flood of<br />
ethanc)l imports will preserve an important market for American farmers<br />
and acidto our nation’s energy<br />
independence, ” he added.<br />
E’ormonths <strong>Exon</strong> has been urging the Administration to eliminate<br />
the duty free treatment received by Brazilian ethanol mixtures. In a<br />
February 3rd letter to the Clayton Yeutter, U.S. Trade Representative,<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> zlndeight other senators urged the “immediate removal” of imported<br />
ethanc)lmixtures from the eligibility list for duty free treatment<br />
under the Generalized System of Preferences. Last January 15th the<br />
U*S. (;ustoms Service ruled that certain imported ethanol mixtures could<br />
be imported duty free.<br />
“It was ridiculous<br />
that the U.S. Customs Service ever permitted<br />
a ) imported ethanol mixtures to enter the United States duty free when the<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXOfl<br />
DUTY FREE ETHANOL<br />
IMPORTS STOPPED<br />
nation is trying to develop its own ethanol industry,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. e “<strong>The</strong><br />
nation was working against itself by allowing imported ethanol in duty<br />
free. I am pleased this unfair practice will be stopped,n he added.<br />
In February<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> noted that if the imported ethanol were allowed<br />
in duty free for only four months, up to 200 million gallons of<br />
Brazilian ethanol mixtures would flood the U.S. ethanol market.<br />
“Such a flood of imported ethanol would have severely damaged<br />
our<br />
nation’s domestic ethanol industry and further harmed the already<br />
ailing farm economy,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Last February <strong>Exon</strong> also cosponsored the introduction of<br />
legislation<br />
which would close the legal loopholes that have allowed<br />
ethanol importers to avoid U.S. tariff laws. <strong>The</strong> legislation would<br />
make all imported ethanol subject to the Congressionally mandated<br />
60-cent per gallon<br />
tariff and close other loopholes.<br />
--30--<br />
.<br />
&<br />
COMMl~EE ONWE BUDGET<br />
.’<br />
WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />
~, OFFICU BUSINESS
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
R W - A<br />
EXON [cZORINSKY TO REQUEST AG COMMITTEE HEARING IN NEBRASKA<br />
LINCOLN, NEBR. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
W r a f h S<br />
A C N a i<br />
on the s r p<br />
Z;orinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> acted in response to a resolution passed<br />
by the N L W c such a hearing.<br />
* ‘It is important that Nebraskans have an opportunity to<br />
learn as much as possible about the Farm Bill as well a w to<br />
inCreZ~Seagricultural exports,m Nebraskats two U.S. Senators<br />
said. “Even more important will be the opportunity for us to<br />
receive input from Nebraska farmers and ranchers on how best to<br />
proceed<br />
and what future actions should be taken to help restore<br />
the health of Nebraska agriculture and main street businesses<br />
which depend<br />
on it.n<br />
-<br />
.
330 Hart Office Bui<br />
Washington,D.C. 2051~ m<br />
r<strong>News</strong><br />
k<br />
! Contact: MarkBowen<br />
R W A<br />
E & Z S D B R<br />
W S Z<br />
W c a b r c<br />
S A i c<br />
m a g p<br />
a f d c i<br />
e l n c<br />
d c b S A<br />
n a c u m p<br />
d i e<br />
B a M<br />
e a d b p<br />
d s m d e<br />
r<br />
p i Z<br />
m<br />
E Z s<br />
N S A<br />
N L F A<br />
r c S A<br />
i p d 1 A 31<br />
@ dairy herd disposal period. <strong>The</strong> resolution urges that red meat<br />
e
I<br />
@ ) D B<br />
p s c n c<br />
s d d p<br />
r s s o<br />
f d i c<br />
d r i a<br />
e p s c s<br />
w d p<br />
-
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J eE<br />
an<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T S 2<br />
For Re:l. ease, Thursday, April 10, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATE PASSES MEASURE TO HELP CATTLE INDUSTRY<br />
W,4SHINGTON, D .C . -- <strong>The</strong> Senate overwhelm ingly approved a<br />
measure offered by U.S. Senators Jim <strong>Exon</strong> (D-NEB), Ed Zorinsky<br />
(D-NEB~Iand Max Baucus (D-MT) taking a positive step toward<br />
correc ting the cattle market cr isis.<br />
<strong>The</strong> measure, a Senate resolution, calls on the Agriculture<br />
Department (USDA) to correct the damage to the markets caused by<br />
the dairy herd slaughter. <strong>The</strong> Senate approved the measure by a<br />
vote o f 86 to 12. It is attached to a bill proposing the sale of<br />
two Wa:~hington, D.C. area airports.<br />
●<br />
immedi,~techanges<br />
Tilemeasure calls on the Secretary of Agriculture to make<br />
in the USDA S buyout program of dairy herds.<br />
It urges the USDA to increase the red meat purchases and<br />
reschedule the slaughter of dairy herds to stabilize the beef<br />
markets, according to <strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky. It recommends the USDA<br />
implement a plan to encourage proportional spacing of dairy<br />
cat:tle slaughtering within each disposal period.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senators said it is essential that the USDA act<br />
q c d c i<br />
m<br />
of the d s<br />
i<br />
USDA’S mismanagement has devastated the cattle market,w<br />
Zorinsl{yand <strong>Exon</strong> said. ‘This measure sends a loud message to<br />
the De]?artment to correct the problems and prevent further damage<br />
to the cattle industry.”<br />
Tilemeasure includes <strong>Exon</strong>’s request that the Agriculture<br />
Secretary report back to the Congress by April 15th on what<br />
corrective action has been taken.<br />
--30--
SERVING NEBRASKA IN THE U.S. SENATE<br />
. SJ J eE<br />
na<br />
<strong>News</strong>Release<br />
3 H O B<br />
M C M U B F<br />
W D 2 A T 2S<br />
For Re Lease, April 10, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON CITES TRAFFIC FIGURES<br />
W,~SHINGTON, D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />
encour aged by the Nebraska legislature s vote to raise the interstate<br />
spczed 1imit to 70 mph, provided his proposed national leg islation<br />
becomes<br />
law.<br />
●’<br />
E~on said he has<br />
suggest ion. With the<br />
enI.ist in the effort,<br />
proposal,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
been encouraged by the response to his<br />
help of President Reagan, whom <strong>Exon</strong> hopes to<br />
“we may be successful in exped iting this<br />
As a canalidate for President in 1980, Reagan<br />
campaigned for increasing the speed 1imit.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> s suggestions would affeet only the nation s interstate<br />
system speed 1imits, leaving the maximum<br />
speed 1imit at 55 mph on<br />
other roads. It would maintain local control of speeds by providing<br />
state and local governments I where i ~ a i<br />
existing speed limits in effect if they desire. This is permissive<br />
legislation only to raise interstate speeds up to 70 mph.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said criticism from “so-called safety experts or bureaucrats<br />
who make a living spewing out statistics were misleading at best. ”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said those employing “irresponsible scare tactics” are<br />
attacking his proposed bill by citing misleading<br />
traffic death<br />
a<br />
statistics.<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXON<br />
TRAFFIC SAFETY FIGURES<br />
‘<strong>The</strong>re have been published reports that deaths on Nebraska roads<br />
have decreased since the 55 mph speed limit went into effect,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />
said. “That’s true, but they don’t seem to recognize the obvious fact<br />
their statistics prove that over 90% of the traffic deaths do not<br />
occur on interstatesr” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong>se bureaucrats decry raising<br />
the interstate speed to mph, claiming 55 mph is the interstate<br />
speed,~ <strong>Exon</strong> commented<br />
“while ignoring the fact that no traffic has<br />
moved at 55 mph on Nebraskans interstate for a decade.v<br />
‘Those desk bound bureaucrats should venture out into the real<br />
world they would know that Nebraska{s interstate traffic moves at<br />
near 65 mph now and has for years”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> official Nebraska Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents report<br />
shows there were traffic deaths of which only eleven or<br />
percent were on the interstate.<br />
speed as a factor contributing<br />
Of those eleven not one case cited<br />
to the accidents.<br />
Nationwide in 1 according to the most recent national figures<br />
available, there were 44,257 highway deaths, of which 4,300 were on<br />
the interstates. This proves the old axiom that ‘figures donlt lie<br />
but sometimes<br />
liars figure.”<br />
-
U S e . n a S t o<br />
●<br />
E Z<br />
N e b r<br />
SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuildinq<br />
~NaShi.l~torl, D.C.20510<br />
Contact:Art Jaeaer<br />
2<br />
FOR I’T4EDI’ATE RELEASE: April 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EFF~TS OF DAIRY SLATJGTER‘D~?ASTATING,1 ZORI’{SKYAm<br />
EXON cmR~<br />
‘~{~shirgton, D.C............<strong>The</strong>effectsof the AgricultureDepartment’sdairy herd<br />
slaughterprogramhave been “devastating”so far, Senators~ward Zorinskyad<br />
J. James<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> }~avecharged.<br />
‘Nithan influxof beef severelydepressingMidwesterncattlemarkets,the two Nebraska<br />
●senatorsasked in a letterwhy the adversereactionwasn’tforeseenby TJSDA.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y also questionedif governmentpurchaseof 400 millionpouds of red meat will be<br />
sufficientto solvethe problem.<br />
A federaljudgehas temporarilyblockd the slaughterprogrambecauseof cunplaints<br />
fran the Vmane Society. ‘Ultimately, however,the programcould see 1.5millioncattle<br />
killedto reducethe dairy surplus.<br />
IrltheirApril9 letterto AgricultureSecretaryRichardLyng, Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong><br />
link<he USDA slaughterprogramto a “precipitousdeclinenin livestockprices.<br />
“filile concedingthat the pricedropmay be an overreaction,the senatorssaid,‘a<br />
negativereactionshouldhave been foreseen,particularlywhen orderlymarketingpractices<br />
are not followed.”<br />
Disposalof government-purchased red meat, Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said,may onlydisplace<br />
cmercial sales. “T*must...questionwhetherthe purchase...willhave its intended<br />
●Iresultof totallyoffsettingthe dairybuyout,nthey said.
2<br />
At the same time,Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said, IIthecontinuedinfluxof Canadianand other<br />
foreignmeat furthercontributesto downwardpricepressureat a timewhen our dmestic<br />
producersare being eliminatedon a wholesalebasis.n<br />
<strong>The</strong> two senatorsalso questiond why tax-exemptfinanciq is helpi~ an Irishcompany<br />
establisha “eorgiadairy operationwhile‘1.S.producersare beingeliminated.<br />
Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> urgedLyng to ‘establisha dairyherd buyouta<br />
red meat purchase<br />
and disposalschedulethatwill minimize,if not eliminate,the devastatingeffectsof the<br />
(slaughter)program’simplantation thus far.w<br />
WASHINGToNs D.C. 20510<br />
OFFICIALEUSINESS
W<br />
H O B<br />
D 2<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
a<br />
For Release, Tuesday, April 15, <strong>1986</strong><br />
——.—— EXON C:OMMENT ABOUT ATTACK ON LIBYA<br />
Washington, D.C. -- “Unfortunately our strike<br />
force at<br />
Libya hit unintended targets, such as the French Embassy and the<br />
residence of the Japanese Ambassador. <strong>The</strong>se things happen during<br />
war. <strong>The</strong> early reports indicate a rather limited loss of life.<br />
This is good. In my view the President was left with no option<br />
but tcjlaunch the strike force. Given the failure of most of our<br />
allies to discharge their joint responsibilities, we had to go it<br />
alone. I suggest that things are going to get worse before they<br />
get b~ltter, but ignoring a cancer won’t cure it. We took a<br />
calculated risk. We did something and can only hope and pray it<br />
will lead to an eventual partial solution to the terror that is<br />
Khadafy of Libya,” U.S. Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong> Tuesday morning.<br />
-
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
,&<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
a<br />
R W A<br />
— A D N S P<br />
W , D.C . s m S<br />
S C a a D<br />
g n s p S<br />
( ( s c<br />
c r p<br />
S D L R (<br />
a<br />
g r m<br />
r<br />
n s i f S e<br />
p S g f d<br />
c i f p m ” a<br />
O m g i S<br />
( , C ( , ( , ( ,<br />
H H ( B J (<br />
( , C ( , R ( ,<br />
R (<br />
Nunn is the r D a s m<br />
thtaSenate Armed S C<br />
-<br />
p
m J . . ——<br />
Contact:<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Re’lease,Thursday. April 17, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXC)NDISAPPOINTED AT REACTION OF ALLIES TO BOMBING LIBYA<br />
——. ——<br />
W;$SHINGTON, D.C. -- ‘<strong>The</strong> President had no option but to<br />
order the strikes against Libya both to retaliate for Khadhafy’s<br />
earlier terrorist activity as well as to discourage future<br />
a p a From the briefings I have r<br />
J C S c<br />
● civilian<br />
to prevent civilian casualties and unnecessary destruction. <strong>The</strong><br />
losses are unfortunate, but this is the risk of<br />
bombing. Nevertheless, our response was appropriate and the<br />
bombinf; runs were carried out in a responsible and professional<br />
manner,” <strong>Exon</strong> said during his weekly conference call with<br />
Nebrasl
I<br />
For R~>lease,Friday, April 18, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON PROPOSES GIVING STATES AUTHORITY TO SET INTERSTATE SPEED<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
\rASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. sENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has<br />
introduced legislation to give states the option to set the speed<br />
limit on interstate highways to a maximum of 70 miles per hour.<br />
I<br />
“In Nebraska the speed limit on interstates may be posted at<br />
55 mph, but it is obvious from traveling the interstate that the<br />
actua:l.authorized speed limit is 65 mph and that is the speed at<br />
which t m <strong>Exon</strong> said. a<br />
i<br />
a<br />
N<br />
a<br />
l w s o s<br />
s l i h a m 70 mph<br />
without losing federal highway funds. No two lane federal<br />
highway, state highway, county or local road speed limits would<br />
be affected whera the federal limit would remain 55 mph.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> states operate these interstates and should have the<br />
acltho:cityto set the speed limits within reason~” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“This legislation would give state government’s the power to<br />
set the speed limits on the interstates within their borders,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said. “If a state would like to retain the 55 mph limit on<br />
interstate or a part of them? such as in urban areas, they would<br />
have the right to do so,” he added.<br />
‘<strong>Exon</strong>also has written to President Reagan seeking his<br />
support of the legislation. Reagan, campaigning for the<br />
Presidency in 1980, opposed the 55 mph speed limit. <strong>Exon</strong> said he<br />
would consider any amendments President Reagan has which would<br />
allow him to support the bill.<br />
‘Statistics show that the vast majority of traffic<br />
fatalities occur on state and county roads, not on interstates~”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said. In Nebraska, of the 237 traffic deaths in 1985, less<br />
than five percent occurred on interstates. Nebraska reports show<br />
that of the 11 interstate fatalities not a single case listed<br />
f!exceeding the speed limit” ‘r ‘speed too fast for conditions” as<br />
factors contributing to the fatal accidents.<br />
-
I<br />
U I S . e ; n a S t o<br />
o I E Z<br />
N e b r<br />
,Suite SR-.443,Russel1 SenateOfficeBuilding<br />
Contact:Art Jaqer<br />
Washingtcln, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />
FOR I*~lIATE RELEASE:April 19, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SE~TElPASSESRESOLUTIONON ErJROPEAFJ I’~RT RESTRICTIONSBACK~ BY ZORINSKYAm<br />
EXON<br />
!Yashi ngton, D.C............<strong>The</strong>Senatehas a~roved legislationcosponsoredby Nebraska<br />
seIlatOYSrewardZ<br />
J. James<strong>Exon</strong> opposingimportrestrictionson up to $1<br />
billionin TJ.S. farmproductsgoing to Spainand Portugal.<br />
<strong>The</strong> restrictionsresultfrom the admittanceof Spainam<br />
Portugalinto the Euro-an<br />
Cmunity’ January1. <strong>The</strong>y includetariffsboostingthe cost of TJ.S. grain to Spainand<br />
●<br />
) quotasreducingthe amountof grain and oilseedsthat Portugalcan im~rt.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ElnitdStatescontetisthe quotasviolatethe c~neralAgrment on Tariffsand<br />
T m t a b n<br />
In additionto puttingthe Senateon recordas opposingthe restrictions,the<br />
resolutic~n sponsoredjointlyby Zorinsky,<strong>Exon</strong> and other farm statesenatorsbacks<br />
retaliatc)ry moves announcedby the ReaganAdministration.<br />
<strong>The</strong> retaliatorymoves establishquotasand tariffson EC productsenteringthis<br />
countrytlnlessthe Europeansrepealtheirrestrictions.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> EuropeanCmunity’s<br />
agriculturalpolicyhas seriouslyhurt TJ.S.farm exportsat<br />
a<br />
when we can leastaffordit,~said Zorinsky,rankingDemocraton the Agriculture<br />
‘Our farmersshouldnot have to pay the price for the EuropeanCmunity’s<br />
enla:rgaent~”added<strong>Exon</strong>.<br />
●) <strong>The</strong> resolutionpassedon a voicevote April 17.
uo~o E i e n a t o<br />
E<br />
Z<br />
N e b r<br />
SuiteSR-{,43,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />
Contact:Art Ja~er<br />
‘Nashi]gtorlr D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />
FOR 1-1 ATE RELEASE:April 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />
ZORINSKY/EXONTJRqECYANt~ESIN PAYYEW LIMITATIONWLICY<br />
‘Nashirgton, D.C............TJSDArqulations implementingthe $50,000annual1imit.or!<br />
crop subsidiesand farmprogrambenefitsare hurtingbeginningfarmers,Senators~war{l<br />
Zorinsky{D.-Mb.) and J. James<strong>Exon</strong> (D.-Neb.) have charged.<br />
In an April21 letterto AgricultureSecretaryRichardE. Lyng, Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong><br />
notedthat:the rJSDAregulationstreatfarmerswho shareequi~ent ati are cosignerson<br />
loansas :1singleoperation.<br />
But tightcreditand the poor agriculturaleconanyoften forceyoung farmersto share<br />
equi~ent with familymembersalso in agriculture,the senatorssaid. Likewise,family<br />
m~ers<br />
establishedin farmingoftencosignloansfor thosejust startingout, they said.<br />
As a result,Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said,a young farmerprudentlyseekingto minimize<br />
creditdemandsati equi~ent purchasesruns IIheadlongintoTJSDAguidelinesthat<br />
unnecessax:ily penalize”him and his family.<br />
<strong>The</strong> two NebraskansaskedLyw<br />
to reconsiderthe paymentlimitp<br />
enhance,r“atherthandeter,the continuationof our l<br />
w<br />
systemof familyfarming.”
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington,D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
. I Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
~<br />
R T A<br />
—..—— EXON SUPPORTS PROHIBITING THE IRS FROM REQUIRING MILEAGE LOGBOOKS<br />
IVASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is<br />
cosponsoring legislation (S.2136) to prevent the Internal Revenue<br />
Service (IRS) from requiring taxpayers to keep detailed mileage<br />
logbooks for business vehicles.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> Congress thought it had corrected this problem last year by<br />
pzohil)iting the IRS from requiring mileage logs for business vehicles.<br />
Unfortunatelyr the IRS in rewriting the regulations has created<br />
confusion by saying that a logbook is not required, but implying that a<br />
logboc)k is the only way to qualify for the deduction,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
~!helegislation would require the IRS to reinstate the mileage<br />
r k r used prior 1984 change. Prior to<br />
1984 contemporaneous log keeping was not required.<br />
‘Taxpayers were led to believe they did not need to keep a<br />
Iogboclk,but many are now worried that without the logbook they don’t<br />
qualify for the deduction,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>The</strong> legislation is currently<br />
pendir~g before<br />
the Senate Finance Committee.<br />
“As a former owner of my own business,<br />
I know the importance of<br />
this provision and will continue to work to end unnecessary regulations<br />
by the IRS and other federal agencies,W <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
-
Jim<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
Hart Office Building<br />
I 1<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
.1 Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:2<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
For Release, Thursday, April 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON SUPPORTS EXTENDING TAX AMENDMENT PERIOD FOR INSOLVENT FARMERS<br />
klASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is<br />
cosponsoring legislation (S.2350) to extend the time for insolvent<br />
farmers to file amended returns to take advantage of a recent tax law<br />
change.<br />
On April 7th, the President signed into law a provision which<br />
provitles that insolvent farmers who sell or transfer farmland to<br />
satisf’y a debt or to avoid foreclosure<br />
do not have to count any<br />
●<br />
minimcim<br />
capitzll gains realized from that transaction for calculating the<br />
tax.<br />
‘Even though this change allows farmers to amend their tax<br />
returr[sdating back to 1982, current law mandated that farmers file<br />
an amended 1982 return by April 15th of this year. Farmers were thus<br />
given only eight days to amend a 1982 return,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. This<br />
legislation will give insolvent farmers an additional six months from<br />
the date of enactment into law to amend returns dating back to 1982.<br />
U.S. Senator Ed Zorinsky (D-NEB) is also a cosponsor of the bill.<br />
Elxonhas contacted the members of the Senate Finance Committee<br />
and urged them<br />
In a letter to<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said ‘<strong>The</strong><br />
to move quickly to approve the six-month extension.<br />
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Bob Packwood (R-OR),<br />
Congress clearly intended the protections of this new<br />
● gettir,g<br />
be available for transactions made in 1982, but the delay in<br />
this legislation enacted gave many farmers and their<br />
accourltants too little time to act.”<br />
--30--
+.<br />
H<br />
R<br />
S<br />
A<br />
W 2<br />
S L<br />
●<br />
*<br />
Your letter of March 28, <strong>1986</strong> was devoid of a soluti,on to the<br />
problem. My concern over excessive printing of soil surveys<br />
appeared to be dismissed with a “let’s divert attention from the<br />
waste” issue. I am once again asking that you consider my<br />
concern and address the question on a forthright basis. Radical<br />
change is obviously necessary to stop this waste and abuse. Your<br />
trite responses to my suggestions and your bureaucratic feeding<br />
the press of copies of our letters “ordering” copies are a clever<br />
divergence, but ignore the problem.<br />
d a S<br />
A a c r<br />
d f w i l q<br />
n u s<br />
p r I C N<br />
e r r<br />
a s C c N<br />
N o h a<br />
D A e L I<br />
a c o u<br />
C S o A a t l<br />
e<br />
e s r o<br />
f l a f c p<br />
a o “ a ”<br />
D p u<br />
c e C C a<br />
I d m h S<br />
C o t “ q a a<br />
1 c c c<br />
Cc,ngressional purposes are borne by the U.S. Printing Office<br />
rather than the Department of Agriculture. As it ‘turns out, the<br />
pcllicy seems to be to print all we can whether needed or not and<br />
obtain Congressional “orders” for the maximum since the costs are<br />
ncltpaid by the Department of Agriculture. Our Lincoln office<br />
fell into this “trap” and for that we plead “guilty.”
. .<br />
t’ ,<br />
●<br />
H<br />
A<br />
2<br />
R<br />
I<br />
●’<br />
i p 5 c a s a<br />
c a p 1 p<br />
a 1 f i<br />
d a l<br />
d<br />
p<br />
A c N R D<br />
N I f n o a s<br />
d p i C<br />
d f t a o<br />
o t c<br />
s s d<br />
b t I<br />
e A s W I<br />
f c D A<br />
t s W l t<br />
p l l<br />
c s a q<br />
a p c E<br />
t s W<br />
t<br />
o c H M N<br />
N R D T N<br />
t b b s<br />
w r a a s s i<br />
h i r<br />
s p c N<br />
C s m B r<br />
a 1 s<br />
I<br />
a<br />
C P o n s<br />
C<br />
h<br />
a c r p f<br />
e c C C a<br />
m C w s<br />
p w s e a a<br />
u d n
I<br />
* H R<br />
A<br />
3<br />
My t e<br />
D b d a r n<br />
c n a g c a c i<br />
d e e w<br />
I d o “ surveys to<br />
w I “ “ s i b<br />
d c u t<br />
s<br />
S<br />
U<br />
S<br />
S<br />
E<br />
H D<br />
C S B C<br />
H<br />
L C<br />
R M M S B C<br />
H J H<br />
C S C A N<br />
F<br />
H E Z<br />
R M M S C A<br />
N<br />
F<br />
H<br />
H<br />
C S C A<br />
H<br />
S<br />
R M M S C A
1- . ,<br />
.<br />
M<br />
R<br />
S<br />
U D A<br />
W D .<br />
L<br />
I r i P O p<br />
250 c c s r d<br />
o I n r p r<br />
w d c a<br />
i C C N r<br />
P O p c c<br />
s r S s<br />
C D U<br />
D A c<br />
o C C a<br />
5 a c w a p 1<br />
a<br />
P c t r h<br />
u r a r<br />
p a r e p c<br />
U T C 1 secretary<br />
A a d n c<br />
p o f p<br />
r w b s p<br />
w c $400 h P<br />
p I t y a f g<br />
f c e h<br />
b d N a s<br />
s c 1<br />
c c r p s<br />
N C d s p<br />
n w s<br />
your first acts as Secretary of Agriculture I urge<br />
you to eliminate the wasteful overprinting of these reports by<br />
reducing the number printed for Members of Congress and the<br />
U I s t c s g a<br />
s o M C r a<br />
c r p h r<br />
w<br />
a t I w a i a<br />
e<br />
Sincerely,<br />
J. James <strong>Exon</strong><br />
United States Senator
●)<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R<br />
E C A S<br />
W<br />
B<br />
S<br />
P<br />
(D-NEB) T<br />
u p a S f b<br />
a e p p b<br />
b S o<br />
d p r<br />
d b b p S<br />
B<br />
C<br />
S<br />
A<br />
I
+<br />
●<br />
B<br />
S<br />
S<br />
P N F A S D<br />
C S Y A N<br />
D<br />
T<br />
1 F F C D<br />
I N D A R B<br />
S E D F G<br />
I E A W F F<br />
G E B F G<br />
L B M I P<br />
S<br />
C S T C<br />
A B A F A G B<br />
F R P E<br />
G B I A<br />
S A P A<br />
M<br />
A<br />
F C M A<br />
R L D E T<br />
S O A S Q<br />
G<br />
E D A M F<br />
F C T E F G L<br />
A L N F A S N<br />
A S E L S M<br />
R S B<br />
R C F D O<br />
M B I A<br />
K I R D<br />
A S W<br />
O E D C<br />
R<br />
B S S J I<br />
O A W W S<br />
I M C A<br />
R D I V<br />
= A C C<br />
A<br />
S Y S E H (<br />
A ( I P<br />
C<br />
P B B E<br />
B B S Y S A<br />
F R I C<br />
N TO EFFECTIVELY DEAL WITH THE DEFICIT.<br />
Y C AND THE PRESIDENT<br />
TRIED TO DUCK THE DEFICIT CRISIS AGAIN BY TURNING OVER THE<br />
LEGISLATIVE RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE DIFFICULT CHOICES TO AN<br />
ARBITRARY MATHEMATICAL FORMULA. AS MY COLLEAGUES WELL KNOW, I<br />
STRONGLY OPPOSED THE GRAMM-RUDm AMENDMENT TO THE PRESIDENT’S $2<br />
TRILLION DEBT CEILING INCREASE REQUEST. I FELT THAT THE<br />
B<br />
R<br />
E<br />
O
.<br />
.> .- on .n xnnr n . . . - A m.. . . . - . . . . . --- -_..--—- — - .---_— ~ -A ,-...-<br />
-WWVUYL-KUUIVH hrFKuALH wAb Nu’1’ A KESPUNS 1BLE ANSWER “l”u UUK<br />
N ‘S S E P<br />
W I O A U A S<br />
R G P I S<br />
G B W S L C ( ,<br />
H I S W D<br />
R T G G<br />
L I T P<br />
O<br />
F G A<br />
D R<br />
T A S M N A<br />
SOIJND FISCAL POLICY IS BEFORE THE SENATE. I AM PLEASED TO<br />
SU1~PORT THE DOMENICI-CHILES BI-PARTISAN BUDGET p~c I VOTED FOR<br />
THIS PROPOSAL IN THE SENATE BUDGET COMMITTEE AND PARTICIPATED IN<br />
N W p C<br />
B B A F A F SOUND PLAN<br />
TO BALANCE THE BUDGET BY 1 B B P<br />
F M D R T G<br />
P<br />
C R M M B<br />
C C W<br />
U D C C G<br />
F S Y S B C W<br />
A T B C M P A<br />
B W S R D<br />
W I S S S P<br />
W<br />
C<br />
B L D A B<br />
R T<br />
C C A<br />
G A S B B A<br />
F P R B C R<br />
C S B C I B<br />
R THE CONSENSUS OF THE CONGRESS AND THE PEOPLE.<br />
WE NO M A A B<br />
A C A P C<br />
B P S S<br />
A P E B B A<br />
“ B S R H<br />
S Y L C A<br />
S R P B D<br />
1 A W A C B R<br />
S T A L N<br />
C D N P F<br />
Y L T A I F FOR A MUCH NEEDED FARM<br />
C I E S A REPLACEMENT FOR THE<br />
C S S<br />
I
*<br />
*, ,*<br />
.<br />
0<br />
I E P R<br />
M S R F A<br />
R C B P<br />
R D R F S<br />
B P E R I<br />
I I R R<br />
R C C L I<br />
T C P I T I<br />
O F C<br />
W<br />
I<br />
P I B B<br />
D T G<br />
C P P N<br />
C<br />
B O E P<br />
I<br />
B W F I D<br />
B O W P B<br />
G D T B<br />
F C A A S<br />
C W A B R A<br />
S R P<br />
S<br />
P D R<br />
P D A L T<br />
F S F B A F G<br />
B E B A S P<br />
G F R I C S<br />
T B E C<br />
G A C S<br />
O
Released<br />
April 28, <strong>1986</strong><br />
<strong>Exon</strong> Thanked for Protecting Rural Programs<br />
U.S.Senator Jim<strong>Exon</strong>waspresented acakeinappreciation forhisuccessful<br />
efforts intheSenateBudgetCommittee toprotect federal funding<br />
fortheRuralElectric Administration andRuralTelephone Bank.<strong>The</strong>President’s<br />
budgethasproposed phasing outfederal funding fortheserural programs.Presenting<br />
thecaketo<strong>Exon</strong>areKimEpstein (left) andStuart Procter<br />
(right) oftheNational Telephone Cooperative Association.
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
a Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R 1~<br />
6 M A I I<br />
W , D .C . S i<br />
V A m i<br />
a M C I<br />
c i s i<br />
p p i u c<br />
a c s<br />
f a C<br />
-
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
.<strong>News</strong><br />
. [ Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
I<br />
FOICRelease, Tuesday, May 6, <strong>1986</strong><br />
.— EXON & ZORINSKY URGE ABANDONMENT OF PROPOSED SOIL SERVICE OFFICES MOVE<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. --- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
Tusday sent a letter from six U.S. Senators to Agriculture<br />
Secretary Richard Lyng requesting abandonment of the<br />
Administration’s efforts to close Soil Conservation Service<br />
OffiCeS in Nebraska, Pennsylvania and Oregon.<br />
●<br />
centralize<br />
T’heDepartment of Agriculture has announced plans to<br />
all such services in Fort Worth, Texas, supposedly for<br />
ecc)nomic reasons.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> letter,” <strong>Exon</strong> said, “was formulated<br />
to take a strong<br />
bipartisan approach in opposition to this ill-advised action by<br />
the De]?artment of Agriculture.H<br />
111addition to Democrats <strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky, the letter was<br />
signed by Republican Senators John Heinz and Arlen Specter of<br />
Pennsylvania and Bob Packwood and Mark Hatfield of Oregon.<br />
--30--
For Rc!lease, Thursday, May 8, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON E’RAISESPASSAGE OF DEFENSE REORGANIZATION BILL<br />
—.<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
VrASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) praised the<br />
passage of the legislation to reorganize the Defense Department. <strong>The</strong><br />
Senate passed the bill with an unusual<br />
95 to O vote.<br />
‘Senate approval marks the first major reorganization of the<br />
Department of Defense and the military services,n said <strong>Exon</strong>, who is a<br />
senio~’member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. <strong>Exon</strong> cosponsored<br />
the legislation and participated in drafting the reorganization.<br />
‘This is a good bill which passed over serious objections from the<br />
●’<br />
pentagon bureaucracy. It will make a number of much needed improvements<br />
in streamlining the operation of the Defense Department. <strong>The</strong><br />
organizational changes dictated for the Defense Department and<br />
individual military services refocuses attention on military strategy<br />
and reduces much of bureaucratic duplication in the Pentagon,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />
said. “This helps ensure that the billions of dollars spent on national<br />
security is not wasted through duplication or lack of cooperation<br />
between<br />
the services,” ,<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Modern warfare and more importantly the methods of deterring war<br />
have become more complex, <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Dollars alone do not’make a good<br />
national defense. Funding must be complimented with a responsible and<br />
efficient decision making process<br />
and sound strategic planning.n<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill now<br />
goes to a Senate-House Conference Committee to work<br />
●’<br />
differences.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> will be a member<br />
-<br />
of that conference.
“ Jim<br />
E<br />
Nebraska<br />
; <strong>News</strong>o<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Rt?lease, Friday, May 9, <strong>1986</strong><br />
———. ExoN SIIESNEW HOPE-FOR ETHANOL INDUSTRY ——<br />
WASH INGTON, D .C . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NE13) said the<br />
Secretary of Agriculture’s recent decision to aid financially<br />
distressed ethanol producers expresses a welcome change in the<br />
Department’s attitude toward the ethanol industry.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Department of Agriculture (USDA) recently announced a<br />
short-term program to allow financially distressed ethanol<br />
facilities to purchase government-owned grain at reduced costs to<br />
produce ethanol. <strong>Exon</strong> has contacted the USDA several times this<br />
year urging the agency to exercise authority to aid the ethanol<br />
industry.<br />
Falling oil prices in recent months have nearly forced<br />
several ethanol producers out of business. “This action will<br />
provide short-term relief for numerous ethanol producers. More<br />
importantly, it will maintain a much-needed market for America’s<br />
farmers who depend on the fuel ethanol industry important<br />
consumer of grain,” <strong>Exon</strong> wrote to the Agriculture Secretary.<br />
In the letter to the Agriculture Secretary, the Nebraska<br />
Senator said he hoped the USDA action<br />
“signals a renewed<br />
commitment to enhancement of the ethanol industry.”
U S ( . e n aS<br />
t o<br />
E<br />
Z<br />
N e b r<br />
S S R S O B C J<br />
‘ , D 2 2<br />
I<br />
R<br />
Z W I S<br />
r D ...........S ~ Z<br />
a $ a s a L w i s ~<br />
a f N a s<br />
W D w S A C S 8<br />
s a $ i c f e i P<br />
R C C T N<br />
● ) f w i s s C D<br />
o<br />
N C P O a n w s<br />
N S D ~ C K c d c<br />
i<br />
n<br />
d f r i o t<br />
t r b<br />
I<br />
a<br />
Z w i s f<br />
p c l e<br />
‘<br />
r<br />
g<br />
“:;ucha resultis particularlycriticalto a regionfacingthe<br />
t<br />
agriculturalcrisisand water shortages,nthey said.<br />
A $250,000federala~ropriation,the senatorssaid,would fund additionalweather<br />
s s s a<br />
d<br />
m<br />
m s a s e<br />
i<br />
p<br />
s<br />
a
N e b r<br />
Suite~SR-41;3, RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />
Contact:Art Jaqer<br />
‘Washington, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6552<br />
FOR IT~Il,TE RELEASE:‘by 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />
‘~ashi~ton,D.C............Fourhighlyqualifid<br />
‘iebraskahig”:: schoolstudentshave<br />
‘ken sf~lect ed to spenda year in “~rmanyunder an,exchangeprogrm sponsord jbintlyby<br />
,,.,,. ,;,,<br />
the U.S. Ccngressand the ‘dest“+rmanBundestag,Senators~ward Zorir?skyand J. James<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> s:~idttiay.<br />
in July and returnin mid-1987are SusannahY, Davis and JustinF.<br />
Lisa L. Hellbuschof<br />
?rand ISland,<br />
and TiffarI}’ D. Jones Of Orleans,<br />
among sophmores and juniorspicked for the progrm nationwide.<br />
App~ic~~ntstotaledmore than ~,000.<br />
Selectionis based totallyon merit.<br />
A~licants are nminat~<br />
‘D>’ their schoolsand<br />
must knve a grade point averageof at leaset3.2 on a 4.0 scale.<br />
Tncjsepicked for the programlivewith “~rmanhost familiesfor a<br />
“&man schools. Duri~ the yearl they cmplete ua~rs or projectson<br />
year and attend<br />
S ‘<br />
relationsthat are presentedto Congressand othersduringa visit to “Washingtonon their<br />
returr..
——<br />
330<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
0 Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
E’or Release, Monday, May 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />
NATIONAL EYE CARE PROJECT AVAILABLE TO NEEDY ELDERLY<br />
——-<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -. U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) said elderly<br />
Neloraskans who do not have a personal eye doctor should consider<br />
participating in the National Eye Care Project.<br />
<strong>The</strong> project is being sponsored by the American Academy of<br />
Ophthalmology and the Nebraska Academy of Ophthalmology to make<br />
professional medical eye care available to needy elderly persons. <strong>The</strong><br />
a<br />
out-of-pocket<br />
eye care services would be available to needy elderly at no<br />
cost to the patient.<br />
To qualify for the National Eye Care Project, a person must:<br />
1.) Be a U.S. citizen or legal resident; 2.) Be 65 years of age or<br />
olcier; 3.) Not have a personal ophthalmologist; 4.) Have need for a<br />
medical eye examination.<br />
Nebraskans 65 or older who are interested in participating in the<br />
pr(>gra]nshould call the toll-free number for Nebraska. <strong>The</strong> number<br />
is 1-830-222-EYES.<br />
<strong>The</strong> project’s emphasis is to aid the needy. If a patient does<br />
not:have Medicare or other health insurance, the physicians services<br />
are pr,~vided without charge. If the patient has Medicare or other<br />
health<br />
insurance, this will pay the entire cost of the physician’s<br />
s For this project only, volunteer ophthalmologists have<br />
agreed to accept Medicare and insurance assignment as payment in full,<br />
according to the Nebraska Academy of Ophthalmology.<br />
t<br />
-
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224.4224<br />
R T<br />
— R F D I F<br />
W S (D-NE)<br />
r e f i<br />
S f d s<br />
v p a p s I<br />
a p e i f<br />
y<br />
s<br />
S P r a a<br />
g i $ l<br />
1 E a t f i<br />
$ r pai,d<br />
$ N i t l N<br />
1<br />
END<br />
( M A S E<br />
F D S W<br />
S )
Nebraska<br />
0’ J“imE;on <strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
1<br />
For R Thursday, May 15, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—. EXON :;AYSGRAIN QUALITY STANDARDS NEED TO BE TOUGHER<br />
WASHINGTON~ D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is supporting<br />
legislation (S.1121) to tighten the quality standards of exported<br />
grain,<br />
‘ f p c g<br />
w s h s<br />
9<br />
q g b d o<br />
!?helegislation would prohibit the addition of any material, such<br />
as gr:~indust, to export shipments unless done to conform to a<br />
contrnct. Also, it would prohibit the addition of any nongrain<br />
m e t r c i<br />
f<br />
N S q e<br />
r A f U S a b<br />
c w m<br />
make f:ertain the clean grains American farmers produce and sell are<br />
what is d s<br />
need to act to clean up the dirty grain being<br />
sold,” <strong>Exon</strong><br />
said. “If the U.S. is to remain competitive on the world market the<br />
grain delivered must be of better quality<br />
than our foreign<br />
compe{:itors.”<br />
--END--
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Re lease, M<br />
EXON: ILEGISLAT 10N OFFERED TO STUDY AVIAT 10N SAFETY AND FAA<br />
W,4SHINGTON, D .C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has joined in<br />
introdl~cing legislation (S.2417) in the U.S. Senate to study ways to<br />
improv(~aviation<br />
safety.<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislation would create the Aviation Safety Commission,<br />
composed of seven members<br />
appointed by the President with the advice<br />
of Congress. <strong>The</strong> Commission would conduct an indepth study of the<br />
F A A ( e i<br />
● r p c<br />
a<br />
s<br />
aviation and ensure that it is safe,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said. “We want to make<br />
sure t!latsafety regulations and aircraft maintenance are not<br />
s e a p r<br />
Democratic member of the Senate Aviation Subcommittee.<br />
<strong>The</strong> study will examine whether the FAA has provided adequate<br />
re~our(:es to ensure aviation<br />
safety and if the FAA should be<br />
reorganized. <strong>The</strong> Commission would also be directed to make<br />
recommendations of how to improve enforcement of FAA safety<br />
regulations.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> i n a i<br />
●<br />
ensure<br />
)<br />
this study obvious,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> FAA has a responsibility to<br />
that airlines are properly meeting airplane maintenance<br />
scl~edules and that there is a sufficient number of inspectors and air<br />
trz~fficcontrollers so the flying public is safe,” he added.<br />
flk%b.oM<br />
--30--
●<br />
J<br />
Contact:<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Re!lease,Monday, May 19, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON E~AYSDON’T CHANGE DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME<br />
klASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />
daylight savings time should be kept as it is and “not be<br />
extended for an additional three weeks. <strong>Exon</strong> made the remarks<br />
in a speech on the Senate floor during consideration of<br />
legislation to extend daylight savings time.<br />
●<br />
“Leave well enough alonerw <strong>Exon</strong> said in opposing the<br />
proposed extension. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator expressed concern that<br />
extending daylight savings time would jeopardize the safety of<br />
school children in the mornings. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator said<br />
parents would disagree with claims that extending daylight<br />
savings time would not increase the number of accidents or<br />
crimes involving children.<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposal would extend daylight savings time by three<br />
weeks by changing the starting date from the fourth to the first<br />
Sunday in April.<br />
E e f w b e<br />
d s “ d s<br />
h g n f h s<br />
s t f E d savings would<br />
reduce the morning daylight time those farmers would have to do<br />
chores;before they go to their second job,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
‘Extending daylight savings would be another bad blow to<br />
farmers. <strong>The</strong> farm workday is determined by when the sun rises<br />
and sets not by a clock.” <strong>Exon</strong> said. He pointed out that<br />
farmers active in their communities in the evenings would lose<br />
workir~g hours if daylight savings were extended since they—<br />
would<br />
have to quit b s<br />
used as a main argument against the proposed<br />
extension, a letter he received from the American Farm<br />
which opposes any extension of daylight savings time.<br />
“.<br />
--END--<br />
Bureau
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
,<strong>News</strong><br />
. I Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
,,<br />
FOR R T<br />
— T P G<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND Z<br />
i t N r $<br />
t p g<br />
D T Mass T<br />
A<br />
a a $33,200 N<br />
D R $ O<br />
g p a<br />
d<br />
r t e h<br />
t<br />
p<br />
--END--<br />
rJg8b•0s1<br />
1
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong>,<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Rele:~se~ Friday, May 23, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—————.—— RAISE THIIAUTHORIZATION —— OF THE NORTH ——. LOUP PROJECT<br />
WAS1iINGTON , D .C. -- NEBRASKA U.S . SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED<br />
ZORIN’SKYare cal1ing for an increase in the authorization of the North<br />
Loup Project<br />
in central Nebraska.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senators are cosponsors of legislation (S.1704)<br />
which wo~lld increase from $193 million to $334 million the federal<br />
authorization<br />
for the North Loup Project.<br />
“tlowthat the project is more than 50 percent complete, it is<br />
●’impo~tanl: to ensure that the construction timeline not be interrupted<br />
so that (construction may continue without delayr~<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky<br />
said in t~letter to Senate Energy Committee Chairman Jim McClure<br />
(R-IDAHO].<br />
<strong>The</strong> Bureau of Reclamation has informed the Nebraska Senators that<br />
the incrt:asedauthorization is needed to prevent construction delays.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Administration is supporting the requested authorization increase.<br />
<strong>The</strong> two Senators said “much of the increased cost for the project<br />
is attril)utable to safety considerations made apparent in connection<br />
with the Teton Dam disaster.” <strong>The</strong> Teton Dam gave way during a flood<br />
nearly 10 years ago. <strong>The</strong> design of several projects, including the<br />
North Lo~Ip,were changed to strengthen the dams from flood damage.<br />
<strong>The</strong> North Loup project located in Greeley, Nance, Howard and<br />
●’<br />
Valley counties in Nebraska will irrigate approximately 53,000 acres.<br />
It is estimated for completion in the early 1990s.<br />
d4~905&<br />
--END--
e I<br />
J<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R Wednesday, May 28, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXC)NS;!YSSUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS HA~ PLUSES FOR FARMERS<br />
~—<br />
Wj\SHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />
Supplerlental Appropriations Bill now before the Senate contains<br />
importi~ntchanges for agriculture.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong>, a Senate Budget Committee member, said the<br />
Supplemental Appropriations bill includes a provision to prevent<br />
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from requiring detailed<br />
mileag(> logs for business vehicles. <strong>The</strong> provision would require<br />
the IRi;to reinstate the mileage record keeping regulations which<br />
existec~ prio,r to 1984 when contemporaneous logbooks were not<br />
required for business vehicles.<br />
‘(;ongress thought it corrected the mileage record keeping<br />
issue last year by prohibiting the IRS from requiring detailed<br />
mileag{: logs for business vehicles, but the IRS created further<br />
confusion when it rewrote the regulations implying logs were<br />
nec’esst~ry,”<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill also contains a measure giving insolvent farmers a<br />
six-month extension to amend their tax returns dating back as far<br />
as 1982 to take advantage of a recent tax law change. <strong>The</strong> recent<br />
tax ch
SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />
Contact:Art Jaege]<br />
Washi~]ton,D,C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />
FOR I’T~I?,TERELEASE:Way 31, <strong>1986</strong><br />
ZORINSKYAl~ EXON SEEK 1.00PERCEIWFEDERALFTJWI‘isFOR W:q PApIO CREEK PLAY<br />
‘flashiq ton, D,C............SenatorsEdward Zorinsky(D.-web.)and J. James <strong>Exon</strong> (D.-<br />
web.) have urged the retentionof full fderal<br />
financingfor the scaleddown l?apioCreek<br />
floodcontrolprojectin an3 aroundMaha.<br />
In a Yay 28 letterto the SenateWater ResourcesSub~ittee,<br />
ZorinskyanclEXOn<br />
enthusiasticallyendorsd the reducedArmy Corps of Engineersplan, which would cut the<br />
●project::scost from $120 million to million.<br />
But, the senatorsadded, the scaled-downproposalshouldnot come under new federal<br />
cost-sharingprovisionswhich would requirefive percentlocal funding.<br />
“We str2nglysuggest,” Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> said, “that it would be in the national<br />
interestto...retainthe more favorablecost-sharingprovisionsfor old projectslike<br />
Papio that seek to down-sizeand rduce cost...“<br />
Retentionof 100 percentfederalfundingfor such projects,they said, would encourage<br />
local interestsin other areas to rduce the scope and cost of theirprojects.<br />
‘If old projectsseekingnew, less-costlyand scaled-downchanqesin their<br />
authorizationsare deemedcompletelynew projects,ad<br />
thereforesubjectto the new costsharingprovisions~<br />
projectsponsorswill find t<br />
actuallyincreasingtheirown<br />
constructionoutlayswhile dramaticallyreducingoverallsize and ctost,”the senators<br />
said.<br />
●<br />
‘Thiswould seem to act as a powerfuldisincentivefor project1.edificationsthat<br />
might otherwisebe palatableto local interests...”they said.
In the revisalPapioCreek plan, 16 still-to-be-builtdams would be<br />
rep]acedby<br />
channelimprovaents,an electronicfloodwarningsystemand othermore m~(?st ch?~nqes.<br />
However,the plan would 1not affectother sites alreadyccnnpletdor under construction,<br />
such as DamSites18 and<br />
After severalyears , of debate and discussion,the scaled-downproposalwas @ndorsd<br />
the Corps of Engineersa<br />
nd affectedMaha-area governmentsin mid-April.<br />
<strong>The</strong> plan now neds<br />
approvalfrom Congress,<br />
--
U S ( . e n aS<br />
t o<br />
E<br />
Z<br />
N e b r<br />
SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />
Contact:Art Jaeger<br />
?Vashiqton,D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />
FOR I?-IATE RELEASE:June 5, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATORSrJR~ FEDERALFr~S FOR LO[ll? RIl~ WATER STrJDY<br />
Washington,D.C............S ~ Z<br />
a i $ c a f m<br />
c N R B<br />
June 3 lettersto the SenateAppropriationsCannittee,Zorinskyand <strong>Exon</strong> noted<br />
that,until lastyear, Wbraska had fundedand cotiuctedthe studyon its own.<br />
Howeveri,they said,IItheCmplexity of the Sati Hillsregionhas made it a<br />
P<br />
B R n p c<br />
a<br />
c<br />
b w w w s p s a<br />
f i s s $<br />
appropriat~,late lastyear to begin the jointeffort,they not~.<br />
ZOrinS@<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> asked that the $50,000be includedin the energya<br />
appropriationsbill for the next 12-monthperiod.<br />
water<br />
<strong>The</strong> study is looki~ at potentialirrigationprojects,water for powerplants,flow<br />
needsand watermanagementtechniquesfor the North,Yiddleand SouthLOUp riversand<br />
theirtributaries.<br />
<strong>The</strong> firstcunprehensivestudyof the Loup RiverBasin, it will focus initiallyon the<br />
possibledamningof the CedarCreek area near Spalding.
2<br />
‘ .........~ ~ Z (D.-Wb.) had a perfectattendance<br />
r S r v t f m<br />
F c S mocratic PolicyC show therewere 106<br />
c J t<br />
s % r<br />
Z a<br />
of thin.<br />
Z c a r S<br />
a<br />
p<br />
p<br />
— —
U S f . e n aS t o .<br />
E<br />
Z<br />
N e b r<br />
suite SR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding Contact:Art Jaeger<br />
Washiwton, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />
FOR I-IATE RELEASE:June 5, <strong>1986</strong><br />
FrJNDPOW SOLVIN7DA’4SITE 18 P~BLEYt ZORIVSKYAm EXON TJRTE<br />
Washington,D.C,...........SenatorsMward Zorinskyand J. James EXOIIhave urgd the<br />
Senateto f~~ndconstructionof a water storagepond that would permit the lakebehind Dam<br />
Site outside@aha to be filled.<br />
<strong>The</strong> potilwould receivesewageeffluent-- the liquidby-productof sewagetreatment--<br />
now flowiw intoBoxelderCreek upstreamfran the dam.<br />
Presenceof the effluentin the creek has preventedthe closingof the dam and<br />
edevelo~ent of PapioLake No. 18<br />
for boating, fishingand other recreationuses.<br />
In two June 3 lettersto the .SenateAppropriationsCmittee, Zorinskyand ~on urg~<br />
that the Army Corpsof Erqineersbe permittd to redirect$1.1million to design and<br />
constructthe storagepond at the SkylinePalf Courseon West CenterRoad.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effluent,fran two nearbysewage t~eatmentplants,would collectin the pod<br />
and<br />
be used<br />
both to irrigateand fertilizethe golf course.<br />
Diversionof the effluentfrom BoxelderCreek would clear the way for liftinga ban on<br />
rti~reational activitiesati closingthe dam, locatedat<br />
Zorinskyad<br />
appropriation.<br />
156thand F streets.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> stressedthat their requestwould not requirean additional<br />
‘It is apparentthatwith proper authorityfrm Congressto do so, the Corpsmay<br />
redirectad<br />
o<br />
use currentlyauthorizd futis to build the Lagoonwithoutrequiringan addon<br />
approprial:ion,” they said.<br />
.,
Z<br />
and <strong>Exon</strong> askd the AppropriationsComnitteeto include‘languagepermitting<br />
o<br />
constructionof the pond in the energyand water appropriationsbill for the next fiscal<br />
y<br />
senators’requestfollowsrecmendations<br />
resultiw frm a consensus-building effortby the<br />
Control.<br />
—<br />
made by Waha<br />
area governmentsand<br />
NebraskaWpartment of Environmental
U S f . e n aS<br />
t o<br />
●1 E Z<br />
N e b r<br />
— —<br />
SuiteSR-443,RussellSenateOfficeBuilding<br />
Contact:Art Jaeger<br />
i~ashim~ton, D.C. 20510 (202)224-6551<br />
FOR I*f~IF,TERELEASE:June 8, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATEPASSES<br />
‘Washington, D.C............Senator~ward Zorinsky(D.-*b.)<br />
l b I R S f<br />
has haild S<br />
t<br />
passage<br />
d r d b<br />
l c Z N<br />
S<br />
t<br />
a a 5 a b s a<br />
expectd c C m 8<br />
0 ) Z e a s a s<br />
c<br />
t<br />
v r e<br />
a b v<br />
L e a i a a r<br />
d<br />
<strong>The</strong> IRS,however,subsequentlyi r r t r<br />
d n p t a b v Z<br />
●<br />
l p 5 o r ‘ r<br />
b v “ e a b<br />
d<br />
S g t i<br />
p b t Z s “ l<br />
p b f f b
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
,1 Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R<br />
i<br />
E D OLD NATURAL GAS PRICES NARROWLY DEFEATED<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate by a 48 to<br />
defeated legislation offered by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON<br />
preverlt the administrative decontrol of “old” natural<br />
47 narrowly<br />
(D-NEB) to<br />
gas which would<br />
raise consumer prices.<br />
!l’hel o a S<br />
●<br />
A<br />
( a b p<br />
i<br />
a F E m<br />
R C ( w would allow the price of “old”<br />
natural gas to increase from $1.50 to a high of $2.57 per (Mcf)<br />
thousand cubic feet. Natural gas drilled prior to 1978 is classified<br />
as “oldm gas.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is trying to defy the<br />
will clfCongress which intended that ‘old’ natural gas prices would not<br />
be decontrolledrm <strong>Exon</strong> said. “If implemented the FERC rule would take<br />
billic~ns of dollars out of the pockets of farmers, homeowners, and<br />
small business owners and put it into the pockets of the major oil<br />
compar~ies who own the vast majority of natural gas reserves.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> amendment was cosponsored by U.S. Senator Ed Zorinsky and nine<br />
other senators.<br />
●<br />
decided<br />
Under the 1978 Natural Gas Policy Act the Congress explicitly<br />
not to decontrol the prices of ~oldn natural gas, according to<br />
<strong>Exon</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Congress reaffirmed the decision in 1983. <strong>The</strong> amendment<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXON<br />
“OLD” NATURAL GAS<br />
would have prevented the implementation of the new FERC rule by<br />
●<br />
blocking funds designated to implement the decontrol regulations.<br />
Republican senators generally supported the oil companies position<br />
while most Democrats supported <strong>Exon</strong>’s proposal p c<br />
a b R A<br />
R c S a t p<br />
D c S p<br />
c t c v s<br />
“ c l<br />
scheme where cheaper<br />
‘old’ natural gas prices, now regulated because<br />
the production<br />
costs have been charged off<br />
‘new’ gas prices with their attendant higher discovery and production<br />
costs,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
END<br />
COMMllTEEON<br />
THEBUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON,DC 20510<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release~ Tuesday, June 10, <strong>1986</strong><br />
— EXON SUPPORTS IRA TAX CREDIT<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- “I am pleased to be an original cosponsor<br />
of this amendment to establish a 15% tax credit for Individual<br />
Retirement Account contributions. I have been working on this issue<br />
for several weeks as part of an IRA Task Force appointed by Senate<br />
Democratic Leader, Senator Robert Byrd, to find an alternative to<br />
eliminating the IRA deduction. <strong>The</strong> solution to the IRA ‘problem’ now<br />
has broad bipartisan support. This amendment will make a good tax<br />
reform bill even better by providing a tax credit for all taxpayers<br />
with Individual Retirement Accounts,M Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong>~id at a news<br />
conference held to announce support for a tax credit for Individual<br />
Retirement Accounts.<br />
●<br />
would<br />
‘Congress made the right decision in 1981 when we extended IRAS<br />
to those with private pension plans. To go back now to prior law<br />
be wrong. IRAs are a savings incentive for the middle class and<br />
an important source for new investment capital. With the strains on<br />
thl~Social Security System, the Congress should be looking for ways to<br />
en(:ourage retirement savings, rather than discouraging it,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“When the Senate Finance Committee bill was reported several<br />
weeks ago, I said I support restoring at least a partial deduction for<br />
all taxpayers with IRAs. This amendment will accomplish that goal of<br />
restoring about one-half of the IRA deduction without damaging the Tax<br />
Reform bill. Our amendment simply makes a good Tax Reform bill even<br />
better,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> IRA amendment will be offered to the Tax Reform Bill (HR3838)<br />
by U.S. SenatOrS Chris Dodd (D-CONN), Al D’Amato (R-NY), Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
(D-NEB), Don Riegle (D-MICH), Alan Cranston (D-CALIF), Pete Wilson<br />
(R.-CALIF) and Frank Murkowski (R-ALASKA) .<br />
END
<strong>News</strong><br />
FoiKRelease, Monday, June 16, <strong>1986</strong><br />
ENERGY DEPARTMENT AWARDS GRANT TO UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
were informed Monday that the University of Nebraska-Lincoln was<br />
awarded $51,560 of a three-year grant totalling $S62,550.<br />
<strong>The</strong> U.S. Department of Energy awarded the grant to the<br />
University of Nebraska-Lincoln Physics Department to conduct<br />
magnetic studies of iron-rare-earth metalloid alloys. <strong>The</strong><br />
remaining grant will be awarded as funds become<br />
available<br />
according to Department of Energy.<br />
END
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Tuesday, June 17, <strong>1986</strong><br />
MINUTEMAN MISSILE MOTORS CONTRACT AWARDED<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C . -- <strong>The</strong> Air Fo~ce informed U.S. SENATORS<br />
JINIEXON AND ED ZORINSKY that a Lincoln firm will perform nearly<br />
20 per(:ent of the work under a $14,635,972 contract awarded<br />
Tuesda~~. <strong>The</strong> contract was awarded for the manufacture of 160<br />
motors to upgrade existing Minuteman III missiles.<br />
BKunswick Corporation of Lincoln, Nebraska, a major<br />
subcontractor will perform 17 percent of the work. Brunswick<br />
*<br />
manufactures the motor cases for the rocket motors. <strong>The</strong> contract<br />
was awa~ded to United Technologies Corporation, Chemical System<br />
Divisic}n, of California who is the main contractor.<br />
END
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
Release, Tuesday, June 17, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— USNS CORNHUSKER STATE<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- S<br />
i<br />
U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON today that the Navy has assigned<br />
the name<br />
USNS CORNHUSKER<br />
STATE to a ship that will be part of the Rapid<br />
Deployment<br />
Joint Task Force.<br />
<strong>The</strong> USNS CORNHUSKER<br />
STATE will be a specially converted<br />
crane ship designed to rapidly unload military equipment and<br />
supplies from supply ships for the Rapid Deployment Joint Task<br />
Force. It will serve as needed in the Maritime Administration’s<br />
Ready Reserve Fleet and be operated by the Military Sealift<br />
C e d<br />
E r D m S<br />
S F P S the USNS<br />
CORNHUSKER STATE will be an excellent addition to two other ships<br />
named in honor of Nebraska, the oiler USS PLATTE and the attack<br />
submarine USS OMAHA which are also serving in the U.S. Navy.<br />
END
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Tuesday, June 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXO@ISUPPORTS TAX REFORM; EMPHASIZES POSITIVE ASPECTS FOR AG<br />
——<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) today in a<br />
Senate speech emphasizing the positive effects for agriculture said<br />
that he will support final passage of the Senate Tax Reform bill.<br />
“Particularly pleasing is the positive impact that this tax bill<br />
will have on agriculture. It will permit farmers and other<br />
self-employed workers to deduct up to one-half of their health<br />
insurance costs. It attacks the tax shelters which have encouraged<br />
non--farmers to ‘farm’ the tax Code. e d<br />
p s a s would be doubled to i<br />
ten years. <strong>The</strong> bill greatly restricts the tax losses that can be<br />
written-off by those not earning their living primarily from<br />
agriculture,!’ <strong>Exon</strong> told the Senate.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said he is glad that the Senate<br />
included the amendment he<br />
cosponsored to restore income averaging for agriculture.<br />
included is a provision to protect farmers and ranchers from being<br />
taxed on the amount of the debt<br />
forgiven by their lenders.<br />
“This is not a perfect bill, as is customary with measures we<br />
produce here. I am hopeful that the House-Senate Conference can iron<br />
out the shortcomings and report back even a better bill for a final<br />
vote?,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Th,2Nebraska Senator said one major disappointment with the<br />
Senate tax reform bill are the restrictions placed on Individual<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXON<br />
TAX REFORM<br />
Retirement Accounts.<br />
‘Congress made the right decision in 1981 when<br />
we made IRAs available to all working Ame~icans. With the strains on @<br />
the Social Security system, the Congress should be looking for ways to<br />
encourage retirement savings and capital formation, rather than<br />
discouraging it.<br />
I am convinced that the conferees on this bill will<br />
protect at least a partial IRA benefit for all taxpayers, which has<br />
been my goal,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong>, a member of the Senate Budget Committee said he is<br />
concerned about the drastic yearly revenue swings that result from the<br />
tax reform bill.<br />
‘While the bill is revenue neutral over five years,<br />
the great swings each year could pose significant problems for the<br />
budget process and the economy.<br />
I look forward to working with my<br />
colleagues on the Budget Committee and others to address this<br />
problem,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“On balance, this bill is a vast improvement over the current tax<br />
code and the tax bill passed by the House of Representatives. It<br />
●<br />
lowers the basic tax rates for both individuals and corporations.<br />
It<br />
closes a number of tax shelters, so that business decisions will be<br />
made for economic reasons~ rather than tax reasons. It also<br />
strengthens the minimum corporate tax, so that profitable corporations<br />
will start paying their fair share of the tax burden,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
-
Nebraska<br />
●<br />
Jim E;on <strong>News</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
For Release, Tuesday, June 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />
——. EXON: SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS BILL GETS PRIORITY<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) got a<br />
commitment last week from Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-KS) that<br />
the Su~?plemental Appropriations bill conference report will receive<br />
priority consideration when it is<br />
Re~)ressntatives.<br />
completed<br />
by the House of<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill affects payments<br />
to<br />
farmers by the Commodity<br />
Credit<br />
Corporation<br />
(CCC) which have been<br />
delayed in an extended joint<br />
House-Senate Conference. <strong>Exon</strong> has been pushing for quick approval by<br />
th(:Congress. <strong>The</strong> Supplemental Appropriations bill will allow the CCC<br />
to resume making deficiency payments under the <strong>1986</strong> farm program.<br />
In addition the bill prohibits funding studies to examine the<br />
sale of the nation’s power marketing administrations which includes<br />
the Western Area Power Administration that serves Nebraska. Sale of<br />
th(apower marketing administrations, as proposed by the Reagan<br />
Administration, could increase the cost of electricity generated by<br />
hydropower<br />
plants.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill also includes provisions to extend the legal authority<br />
of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) to guarantee home<br />
mortgages. With lower interest rates , many new home buyers want to<br />
buy homes, but are being delayed by the lack of gurantee authority<br />
from FHA.<br />
-
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Re].ease, Tuesday, June 24, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON GE;TSASSURANCES FOR NEBRASKA TRANSITION RULES<br />
W7\SHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) received<br />
assurar]ces from Senate Finance Committee Chairman Bob Packwood<br />
(R-ORE) and ranking Democrat Russell Long (D-LA) that four<br />
historic preservation projects in Nebraska would be considered<br />
for trzlnsition rules in the joint Senate-House Conference<br />
Committee<br />
on Tax Reform.<br />
Tklefour projects are: 1.) Waterpark, a 41-unit condominium<br />
development in Lincoln, Nebr.; S Fruit Building, a<br />
three-story warehouse in Lincoln, being converted to office<br />
s H.P. Lau Building and Annex in Lincolnr an office and<br />
retail conversion; and 4.) <strong>The</strong> McKesson Robbins housing project,<br />
I<br />
a Part of the Central park Mall Development in Omaha, Nebr.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said in letters to Packwood<br />
and Long that “it is<br />
essential the four Nebraska projects be exempted from the<br />
reductions in the historic preservation tax credit and from the<br />
binding contract requirement dealing with changes in<br />
depreciation.”<br />
END
J“im330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
./ Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Rt~lease,Wednesday, June 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON SAYS NO—<br />
TO SMITHSONIAN FUNDING<br />
WASHINGTON D.C. -- Citing the higher priority needs of<br />
Am.eric:a’sfarmers and ranchers U~S. SENATOR JIM EXON- (D-NEB)<br />
attem~)ted to block a $15 million funding request for two<br />
research projects operated by the Smithsonian Institution.<br />
Dxon told the Senate he had “no particular bone to pick<br />
with the Smithsonian Institution. Indeed, it is a national<br />
treasllre.” <strong>Exon</strong> objected to the Smithsonian funding saying it<br />
would add to the budget deficit and that there were higher<br />
priorities in agriculture.<br />
●<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
E:xonsaid it is inconsistent for those who voted for the<br />
Gramm-.Rudman law to vote for these additional funding requests.<br />
\’otedagainst Gramm-Rudman because of the devastating<br />
impact:it will have on American agriculture.<br />
“We cannot make progress in reducing federal spending if we<br />
pile clnadditional new obligations in future years which are not<br />
absol~~tely essential. I cannot vote for this funding while<br />
Americfa’s farmers, ranchers and main street businessmen are in a<br />
full-scale depression and the government programs to assist them<br />
are being cutr” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislation would authorize $11.1 million for the<br />
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama and $4.5<br />
million for the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory in Arizona.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> acknowledged that important work goes on at both<br />
facilities.<br />
‘Important work is also being performed on America’s farms<br />
and ranches, in our cities and all over this country. Yet,<br />
agriculture and other important government programs have felt<br />
the indiscriminate budget cuts of Gramm-Rudman which is the<br />
law,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Over <strong>Exon</strong>’s objections the Senate approved the Smithsonian<br />
$15 million funding on an 87-13 vote.<br />
-
Jim<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
i 1<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bow~en<br />
Telephone: 202-224-4224<br />
W<br />
W R<br />
a<br />
S (<br />
Once! a A s b<br />
m e i m f A<br />
s<br />
p a d<br />
u w p p A<br />
s l w p<br />
In the s w f d<br />
p s e c r a m<br />
, e D A<br />
●A<br />
p p p<br />
w c s<br />
D d<br />
m f p i<br />
T P r t n s<br />
q d s a<br />
p<br />
t<br />
e<br />
<strong>The</strong> Reagan Administration would have b<br />
i e s A a<br />
T b t I d n<br />
y t p w s<br />
c p p h a s<br />
w d o u d<br />
l c a p t<br />
f s a c a w<br />
d I s a a p I<br />
view it.<br />
A<br />
p r i<br />
e i d i<br />
l a (<br />
h r M u<br />
p i d b<br />
$21!.8 b 1 a p<br />
r p r i<br />
f n b w d It<br />
‘ s r A t away<br />
at b f s g N<br />
d
a d p f c<br />
w a p p<br />
p t p B<br />
t a a<br />
u<br />
p e c<br />
c s o b s<br />
p U S a<br />
b<br />
n<br />
Some s e i a<br />
p e C i<br />
p p s l<br />
c w a C c p<br />
a h e<br />
t a a<br />
C a B i<br />
w p 4 p s 2 m<br />
e m m<br />
I a s w p l<br />
e h I<br />
p p s a<br />
p<br />
A s<br />
t w p<br />
e<br />
p m A f i<br />
t r c d u<br />
p<br />
a c f p c<br />
A f s c<br />
p c p g b<br />
d s y<br />
s f e f e<br />
p m w n<br />
p b c c a m<br />
p m g r f e<br />
b i m i a d<br />
A b p s b<br />
r d s r c “<br />
a d b<br />
i<br />
s<br />
f<br />
i a c m<br />
a s A f<br />
c p I them to send a message to the<br />
President and Congress that current policies are not acceptable<br />
and that they are willing to do their part in reducing government<br />
subsidies and improving farm prices.<br />
END
●’ said. END<br />
●<br />
Jim<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
I<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Wednesdayr June 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS BILL<br />
——<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />
Wednesday he has obtained a commitment from Senate Majority<br />
Leader Bob Dole (R-KS) that the Emergency Supplemental<br />
Appropriations Bill will be considered by the Senate no later<br />
than 4:00 pm this afternoon.<br />
<strong>The</strong> House of Representatives passed the bill by voice vote<br />
Tuesday<br />
evening.<br />
●<br />
<strong>The</strong> measure frees up funds for agricultural and other<br />
necessary government programs to keep them operating. <strong>The</strong><br />
Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS)<br />
offices, for example, have been prevented from issuing checks to<br />
farmers who have qualified under the current Farm Bill.<br />
Last week <strong>Exon</strong> obtained a promise from Dole to give priority<br />
collsidsration to the bill in the Senate after it had been<br />
approved by the House.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> also reported that Dole assured him the President had<br />
ag]:eed to sign the measure after earlier threatening a veto over<br />
certain Rural Electrification Administration provisions agreed to<br />
by the Congress.<br />
“I am confident we can approve this measure today,n <strong>Exon</strong>
I<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
a’Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
—<br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Re lease, Wednesday, June 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />
CRETE :2ECEIVES AIRPORT GRANT<br />
————.<br />
W/4SHINGTON , D .C . -- U .S . SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
were i]~formedWednesday afternoon that Crete is being awarded a<br />
$152,1(]0 grant.<br />
<strong>The</strong> grant is awarded under the Federal Aviation<br />
Administration’s Airport Improvement Program. <strong>The</strong> funds will be<br />
used to purchase land, extend the airport runway and install<br />
●<br />
aviation<br />
runway lighting. Money for these grants comes from taxes paid on<br />
fuel, passenger tickets and other aviation related<br />
activities.<br />
END
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
a Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
For Release, Thursday, June 26, <strong>1986</strong><br />
Lincoln F irm Receives Mul timillion Dollar Contract<br />
WAS141NGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
we’re informed today that the Telex Communications Company of<br />
Lincoln has received a multimillion dollar U.S. Army contract.<br />
<strong>The</strong> U.S. Army awarded the Telex Company a $7,678,416<br />
contract<br />
to build 44,256 antennas.
Nebraska<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
For Release, Fr iday, June 27, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON LAUDS APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS<br />
——.—..——..——<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C. -- Following several days of careful<br />
shepherding and frequent needling by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) the<br />
Congress approved the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Bill which<br />
will allow resumption of Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) payments<br />
to farmers.<br />
Following approval by both Houses of Congress Thursday night, the<br />
●<br />
earlier<br />
bill goes to the President who has promised to sign it after an<br />
veto threat.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> repeated funding interruption of the Commodity Credit<br />
Corporation has played havoc with farm income,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “This<br />
action means the Commodity Credit Corporation will stop living from<br />
hand-to-mouth<br />
he added.<br />
since<br />
it will have funds through the end of the year,”<br />
Tilebill<br />
contains $5.3 billion for the Commodity Credit<br />
Corporation to continue meeting deficiency payments through the end of<br />
the fiscal year.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> noted that the emergency appropriations bill also prohibits<br />
studyit~g the Administration’s proposal to sell the power marketing<br />
administrations.<br />
●<br />
Reagan<br />
“Selling the power marketing administrations, as proposed by the<br />
Administration, may be good for big business, but it would be<br />
bad for consumers,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. Nebraska is served by the Western Area<br />
Power ;qdministration.<br />
END
I<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
For Release, Monday, June 30, <strong>1986</strong><br />
OMAHA PRESS CONFERENCE ON WHEAT POLL<br />
.-—<br />
T7ASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
OF NEEJRASKAAND TOM HARKIN OF IOWA WILL HOLD A PRESS CONFERENCE<br />
IN OMAHA TUESDAY TO DISCUSS THE WHEAT REFERENDUM POLL.<br />
THE PRESS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JULY 1, AT<br />
THE MORNING AT OMAHA EPPLEY AIRPORT. IT WILL BE HELD IN<br />
THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY BOARD ROOM LOCATED IN THE SOUTH TERMINAL.<br />
END
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Rc:lease, Tuesdav, Julv 1, <strong>1986</strong><br />
CONTRACT AWARD<br />
M~ASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
were r~otified Tuesday afternoon that a l~ebraska firm has been<br />
awarded a multimillion dollar construction contract.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Department of Energy announced that the Kiewit<br />
Construction Company of Omaha has been awarded a $17.5 million<br />
contr~.ct to construct a 40 inch diameter crude oil pipeline from<br />
Freepcrt to Texas City, Texas. <strong>The</strong> pipeline will be<br />
●’ approximately 46 miles long when completed.<br />
END
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone: 202-224-4224<br />
FOR RELEASE, SATURDAY, JULY 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATOR EXON APPLAUDS-AMERICAN-GOLD BULLION COIN DESIGNS<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C.. -- SENATOR J. JAMES EXON (D-NE) sponsor of<br />
the American Gold Bullion Coin Act applauded the gold bullion<br />
coin designs just released by the United States Mint.<br />
America’s first regular issue gold coinage in fifty years<br />
will feature Liberty holding a torch in her right hand and an<br />
●’<br />
olive branch in her left hand on the coins’<br />
Of ~=agles on the coins’<br />
reverse.<br />
obverse<br />
and a family<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> new coin designs are attractive pieces of art which<br />
represent basic American values of liberty, freedom and the<br />
family.”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Under the <strong>Exon</strong> legislation, which was signed into law by the<br />
President in December of last year, the new American gold bullion<br />
coinage will be available October 1, <strong>1986</strong>. <strong>The</strong> American Gold<br />
Bullion Coin Act authorizes the minting of gold coins in one<br />
ounce, one-half ounce, one-quarter ounce and one-tenth ounce<br />
siz(ss. <strong>The</strong> coins will carry a nominal face value of fifty,<br />
twenty-five, ten and five dollars respectively and will be sold<br />
at the price of gold plus a service charge to cover the cost of<br />
- MORE -
EXON<br />
EXON APPLAUDS COIN DESIGNS<br />
p d p<br />
m s w p A<br />
K<br />
r<br />
S n p l<br />
p A a S A c<br />
A c e<br />
a i S A<br />
s<br />
c A p f<br />
o p S A g<br />
K p C<br />
c A B m<br />
y<br />
d c <strong>Exon</strong> legislation<br />
mandates that only American gold be used in the new coinage.<br />
A p a b<br />
f c y a A<br />
c a p i U<br />
S o e e o<br />
l d b A S<br />
f t d p t<br />
1 f e d c D<br />
s Miley Busiek.<br />
END
●<br />
Jim <strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
F012RELEASE, MONDAY, JULY 14, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON URGES IMMEDIATE APPROVAL OF DISASTER AID FOR DAWES COUNTY<br />
—.—<br />
Washington D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) today<br />
appealed to President Reagan to immediately approve federal<br />
disaster<br />
aid for Dawes County.<br />
In a letter to President Reagan, Senator <strong>Exon</strong> wrote; “<strong>The</strong><br />
Governor of Nebraska has, today, requested that you declare a<br />
major disaster for Nebraska due to severe storms which caused<br />
heavy damage in Dawes County, Nebraska on June 30th.W<br />
●<br />
“<strong>The</strong> preliminary estimates of damage total over $16<br />
million. This cost estimate is very high and beyond the<br />
capabilities of the State and affected local government without<br />
Federal assistance. In addition, this storm devastation comes on<br />
top of an already serverely depressed rural economy. It is<br />
therefore critically important that disaster assistance be<br />
forthcoming in the near future. I, therefore, respectfully<br />
request your immediate attention to and expeditious approval of<br />
this disaster request,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
END
—<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
. I Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R . F<br />
—-— EXC)NC,4LLSON USDA-TO US~ POWER TO AVERT GRAIN STORAGE SHORTAGE<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has c<br />
S A e a<br />
s l a f i<br />
s<br />
‘ p C C C C<br />
a S A s f<br />
● of<br />
loans available to farmers,M <strong>Exon</strong> said in a letter to the Secretary<br />
Agriculture. “In fact, the Charter states that in storage<br />
deficient areas the Secretary shall make such a<br />
a<br />
<strong>The</strong> letter went on to say, “I strongly urge you to exercise<br />
all<br />
authority available to mitigate this situation, including authority<br />
mandating loans for storage deficient areas.w<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nebraska<br />
Senator said farmers are feeling the effects of a<br />
storage shortage now, “but an even bigger crunch will come this fall<br />
when fe,rmersmay be forced to pile grain on the streets due<br />
to a lack<br />
of storage.n<br />
“Crops look M a<br />
t d m v<br />
r N “ i w<br />
● l s f a<br />
the letter.
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
- ~:~m<strong>Exon</strong><br />
Contact:<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
) t<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
Fox ReI.ease, Tuesday, July 22,<br />
EXO)NURGES APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL MONEy FOR NORTH LOUP pROJECT<br />
— .—<br />
WllSHINGTON, D .C . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) today urged<br />
the Senate Water and Power Subcommittee to approve an additional $140<br />
million to complete the North Loup w p<br />
i w l n<br />
entirely justifiable,” <strong>Exon</strong> told the Senate subcommittee. ‘<strong>The</strong>y stem<br />
l from safety considerations required after the Teton Dam<br />
disastc?r occurred,” he added. A disaster at the Teton Dam in Idaho in<br />
●<br />
~ the mi~[-197~’s prompted the Bureau of Reclamation to create higher<br />
standards for dams after Congress made the first appropriation for the<br />
North Loup project in 1972.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said the additional<br />
funds<br />
are necessary to complete the<br />
I<br />
Davis C!reekDam southwest of Scotia<br />
If the cost ceiling on this project<br />
have tc stop by the end of’the 1987<br />
and numerous irrigation canals.<br />
is not raised, construction will<br />
construction season.<br />
‘Klot funding this project to completion would be the most<br />
wasteful action the Congress could take. ..It would be tatamount to<br />
building a house an then not putting a roof on it,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “What<br />
we cannot afford is a half-built project, which would stand as a<br />
monument to Congresst lack of faith with those who are counting on<br />
● ) -<br />
project,”<br />
he added.
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R W<br />
E E P A<br />
~ D f<br />
S a a<br />
c S (D-NEE3)e E<br />
E P S U b<br />
a<br />
p<br />
g<br />
U S f a h a s<br />
s s g s A<br />
f p C D<br />
A E E P a i<br />
a<br />
e e C S<br />
d p b r p<br />
a<br />
g<br />
e C p<br />
S p g d p<br />
y<br />
‘ d s S<br />
i q r<br />
m b p f c<br />
s m a m<br />
eligible for the Export Enhancement Program,” he added.<br />
●l<br />
<strong>The</strong> Export Enhancement Program is designed to expand sales of<br />
agricultural products by offering export sales bonuses from Commodity<br />
Credit Corporation stocks. <strong>The</strong> amendment was approved on a voice vote<br />
ancladded to the Export-Import Reauthorization Bill.<br />
dRw*G~q -
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For R W<br />
P S S L p<br />
W , D.C. S EXON (D-NEB) r<br />
a I r T P R<br />
p<br />
l r E r<br />
P e i s o<br />
r s l i<br />
P l t N S<br />
● b s l m a R<br />
d a s t<br />
P p a p p<br />
s a t t a l<br />
B G ( c<br />
S C G ( j S<br />
c g i c l<br />
r<br />
i n o bills to increase the<br />
speed l i s s<br />
P R a c d<br />
p campaign and a similar proposal was adopted<br />
Republican National Convention that year.<br />
0<br />
-
S<br />
I t b<br />
m<br />
55 s l<br />
p<br />
a A r<br />
l<br />
a c I a<br />
s t m S<br />
C C D P<br />
s i t I<br />
r t f r f<br />
I r d p<br />
I a c i<br />
i w r t<br />
g<br />
S<br />
l<br />
H<br />
J<br />
U S S<br />
W D 2<br />
●
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
J“imE;on,.<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Wednesday, July<br />
: E C I C<br />
‘ S (<br />
c F E R C s<br />
a<br />
d “ n p<br />
a l c N S<br />
d<br />
strongest possible<br />
terms to reopen this proposal<br />
●<br />
gas<br />
f comment, suspend its implementation, and address the<br />
pricing i a m p r<br />
c c p a m c<br />
l l w E s<br />
s<br />
w l a f p<br />
c r a a a<br />
d p “ n<br />
‘ r r<br />
d s t b C<br />
s a t r p<br />
C r l a<br />
D c c w n<br />
i $ a $ t<br />
● ) of Nebraska. <strong>Exon</strong> said decontrol of ‘old” natural<br />
MORE
D<br />
w c s p i N<br />
c s c should<br />
make renegotiation of gas contracts carrying above market prices<br />
a priority instead of letting m c bigger<br />
p d “ n<br />
1 C e d d<br />
n S t t r e<br />
r p s o C<br />
r o d a d a<br />
f c r rule<br />
decontrolling old natural gas will almost certainly lead to court<br />
challenges and will encourage congressional action to prohibit<br />
implementation<br />
of the rule.<br />
Senators signing the <strong>Exon</strong> letter include: Tom Eagleton<br />
(D-MO), Mark Andrews (R-ND), N K (<br />
C ( R ( E Z ( ,<br />
S (D-ILL), H ( D (<br />
A ( L P ( C (<br />
A D (R-NY), Albert Gore (D-TENN), John Heinz (R-PA),<br />
Charles Grassley (R-IA), David Durenberger ( Don Riegle<br />
(D-MICH), Joe Biden (D-DEL),<br />
Ford. ( , G M<br />
D M (<br />
Sam Nunn ( C<br />
C M (<br />
B ( W<br />
( S (<br />
L ( (<br />
( (<br />
-
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
c’ J“im<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224.4224<br />
For Release, S July<br />
SENATORS REQUESTS FUNDS FOR MISSOURI RECREATION RIVER<br />
—..———.<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
rt~questing $200,000 for the maintenance of the Missouri<br />
National Recreation River project in northeast Nebraska.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> Army Corps of Engineers has cotlstructed streambank<br />
stabilization structures valued at $7.3 million along that<br />
portion of the Missouri River which comprises the Missouri<br />
National Recreation River ...Because maintenance of these<br />
structures is an on-going process, we request that the Committee<br />
● provicle $200,000 in Fiscal Year 1987 operations and maintenance<br />
funds,” the senators wrote<br />
Develc)pment Subcommittee.<br />
to the Senate Energy and Water<br />
<strong>The</strong> streambank stabilization structures have saved many<br />
acres of farmland which could have been lost or damaged by<br />
f s f n p<br />
i<br />
a<br />
M N R p a<br />
s M R e G<br />
N<br />
Y S D l S P<br />
-
<strong>News</strong><br />
For Release, Wednesday, July 30, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATORS URGE INCREASED FUNDS FOR PRAIRIE BEND PROJECT<br />
———<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY are<br />
urging approval of a $ P<br />
f<br />
s<br />
‘ a f ... e<br />
p p p a r t m<br />
Z a l S A E<br />
W D S<br />
● ) S r a $<br />
$ r B R<br />
f y e f would be used for more specific<br />
engineering studies which are necessary before an environmental impact<br />
statement can be<br />
issued.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Prairie Bend proposal is a multipurpose project aimed at<br />
meetir~g the needs of agriculture and wildlife P<br />
b c N s a<br />
f w a f a<br />
W S w fully involved in this work.”<br />
“<strong>The</strong>se funds are to be used for studies necessary<br />
to determine<br />
and melintain adequate instream flows including providing safe and<br />
reliable water supplies, protection of wildlife habitat, and<br />
o ) irrige~tion,” the senators said in the letter.
Nebraska<br />
“ Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, T<br />
— EXON P A F J N<br />
W14SHINGTON, D .C . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) T<br />
i l c a f j<br />
N<br />
a f j r b<br />
e h i c f N F<br />
D C s t c per judge, the<br />
Nebrasl
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
0’Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R S A<br />
A D P P<br />
—<br />
m<br />
W D.C . S W a<br />
S E ( s a t<br />
w<br />
p a d<br />
f<br />
a<br />
p<br />
a<br />
“ m t n a<br />
c i S a C<br />
R A p a a d<br />
d<br />
payments this f s<br />
l m G p<br />
w w t a b c a<br />
G A O ( O M<br />
B G a<br />
r<br />
l<br />
p<br />
o<br />
P r i n c<br />
t S C b c<br />
a g v s p<br />
S “ g d<br />
A a d p s<br />
as~,ist farmers with cash flow problems. N<br />
$2.3<br />
- -
Nebraska<br />
0’J“imE;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
FclrR(:lease,Saturday, August 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATE APPROVES EXON AMENDMENT TO MANDATE DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS<br />
—.,—,———— ————<br />
V7ASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Thursday adopted<br />
SENATOR JIM EXON’S (D-NEB) amendment mandating that advance<br />
de fic:~encypayments be made this fall for winter wheat under the<br />
Farm Elill.<br />
!lEar-ydeficiency payments ~villhelP manY farmers<br />
financially through these economically depressed times,’:<strong>Exon</strong><br />
said . <strong>The</strong> amendment was adopted on a 91 to 7 vote.<br />
‘l’heamendment mandates that 40 percent of the deficiency<br />
payments for wheat be paid this fall. Advance payments for feed<br />
grains; are mandated at 40 percent and 30 percent for cotton and<br />
rice. Deficiency payments are the difference between the<br />
commodity<br />
target price and the loan rate.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Exon</strong> amendment was cosponsored by Senators Ed Zorinsky<br />
(D-NEB), Tom Harkin (D-IA), John Melcher (D-MT) Alan Dixon<br />
(D-ILL), Quentin Burdick (D-ND), and Gary Hart (D-COLO).<br />
<strong>The</strong> 1985 Farm Bill granted the Department of Agriculture<br />
authority to pay deficiency payments in advancef but did not<br />
mandate<br />
it.<br />
-
●’<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
J“im<strong>Exon</strong><br />
.<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For R
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
c Saturday, August 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />
———- EXON Bl\CKEDAMENDMENT TO HELP — SOIJTHERN DROUGHT APPROVED<br />
Wl\SHINGTON, D .C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Friday approved an<br />
amendm[>nt cosponsored by U.S. Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong> (D-NEB) to allow<br />
farmers contributing agricultural products to aid victims o,fa natural<br />
disast~>r a more equitable<br />
tax deduction.<br />
C!l.rrentlaw permits facrnersonly to deduct the actual cost of the<br />
product. <strong>The</strong> amendment WOU1:I change the law to allow farmers to<br />
deduct the wholesale market price of the agricultural product.<br />
●<br />
~I~venthough Midwest farmers are Eacing tough economic times they<br />
are donating hay to help their southern colleagues through a drought,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said. “Changing this law to permit a fair tax deduction will<br />
compensate farmers for their generosity,n he added.<br />
In order to quality for the more favorable deduction the donor<br />
must contribute the product within six-months from the time of the<br />
disaster. <strong>The</strong> recipient of the agricultural product must also certify<br />
that the contribution was made within the six-month period.<br />
According to recent reports more than 1,156 tons of hay from 39<br />
states have arrived in South Carolina as of last July 28. Fifty-two<br />
deaths have been attributed to the drought and rainfall is 50 percent<br />
below normal.<br />
measure was added by voice vote to the debt ceiling<br />
@<br />
legislation which will go to the House of Representatives following<br />
Senate approval.
!<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
For R/:lease~ Saturday, August 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXPORT ENHANCEMENT FOR SOVIETS “STEP IN RIGHT DIRECTION”<br />
——<br />
tYASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said Friday that<br />
the presidential decision to use provisions in the Farm Bill to<br />
enhance export sales of American grains<br />
to the Soviet Union was a<br />
step<br />
in the right direction.<br />
‘It’s obvious the administration was forced to act only<br />
after several farm state senators demanded<br />
in a recent senate<br />
o<br />
amendn~ent that the export subsidy provided in the Farm Bill be<br />
followed by the administration,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
!l’heSenate approved an amendment<br />
to the Export-Import<br />
Reauthorization Bill last month which called on the<br />
administration to extend the Export Enhancement Program to the<br />
Soviet.Union and China. <strong>Exon</strong> was a cosponsor of the amendment.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> cautioned<br />
that this will not solve the faulty<br />
administration policy of relying on exports to eliminate the<br />
depression in agriculture “but at least we were successful in<br />
getting their attention,” he said.<br />
-
● I R W A<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-2U.4224<br />
S<br />
S<br />
I D L R A Q<br />
P H O<br />
P T T<br />
●’<br />
H v o<br />
P<br />
c<br />
S<br />
N W G<br />
G A<br />
e<br />
c t p<br />
I c<br />
g<br />
I t<br />
l<br />
I s i l C<br />
B G T s o<br />
“ c my opinion. a<br />
I<br />
p<br />
c m S c o I<br />
c c I<br />
t s i a s<br />
d N e a r f e<br />
p R A t<br />
a<br />
-
Nebraska<br />
●) U.S. Senator<br />
—<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington,D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
I<br />
I<br />
For Release, F A<br />
C A EXON CHANGE TO HELP RURAL–AIRPORTS<br />
W S C C T<br />
a s p o S p<br />
K a c i t s<br />
T<br />
p a w r S<br />
g m s r<br />
e a a p i l<br />
i c f w A<br />
g would be limited to a maximum of 50 percent federal share<br />
of the cost of the liability insurance, not to exceed $50,000 per<br />
airport. <strong>Exon</strong> is the ranking Democrat on the Aviation Subcommittee.<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposal was added as an amendment<br />
to the National<br />
Transportation Safety Board Reauthorization legislation. It was<br />
supported by the American Association of Airport Executives, National<br />
League of Cities, National Association of Counties and numerous state<br />
and lc)calgovernments.<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposal would not include businesses operating within an<br />
airport, such as restaurants, news stands or parking lots. <strong>The</strong><br />
~<br />
airport would also need to demonstrate<br />
it has all the safety and<br />
security equipment required by the Federal Aviation Administration<br />
(FAA) before it could receive a grant.<br />
m <strong>Exon</strong> said many airports are in jeopardy of closing because of huge<br />
MORE
USS JJ EXON<br />
AVIATION SAFETY<br />
increases in liability insurance costs which they cannot a~to~d. <strong>The</strong><br />
insurance crisis is hitting small and medium sized public a<br />
h E K N a c<br />
p $ a l i p<br />
i l p l $ next year.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Committee also approved <strong>Exon</strong>’s amendment to shorten the length<br />
of the Blue Ribbon Presidential Commission study on aviation safety<br />
Crom one year to nine months. <strong>The</strong> shorter period would guarantee that<br />
the report is completed before the Senate Aviation Subcommittee<br />
completes reviewing the Aviation Trust Fund bill next<br />
<strong>The</strong> Commission study is to determine if the FAA is devoting<br />
adequate resources and funds to ensure aviation safety and whether the<br />
FAIIshould be reorganized as a separate agency. <strong>The</strong> FAA is currently<br />
a part of the Department<br />
OE Transportation.<br />
-<br />
COMMl~EE ON<br />
THEBUDGET<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20610-6100<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS
s<br />
J<br />
)<br />
For Release, M A<br />
. ...... M M—-—— CONSTRUCIIION APPROVED–FOR NEBRASKA —,.-—.—<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate has approved more than<br />
$26 rail.tionin military construction projects for Nebraska, U.S.<br />
SENATOR JIM EXON (1)-NEJ3)said S n<br />
E a s m S S<br />
C p a<br />
D A w S p a<br />
3 S n<br />
i $ m i O<br />
F B N be used<br />
to construct an additional electrical substation, modernize the<br />
Strategic Command Combat Center<br />
and also to improve overall<br />
security at the base.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill authorizes more than $1.6 million for the Nebraska<br />
National Guard. Projects include a $135,000 maintenance shop at<br />
Gering, $ f t 8 r H 3 $<br />
7<br />
o a s b L<br />
i L $ i f<br />
m<br />
N N G<br />
a<br />
d<br />
a a j c r<br />
b S H v<br />
-<br />
i
Nebraska .::,:.....,<br />
U.S. Senator .>“’”””<br />
Mxoni<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510 m<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R T A<br />
E P C A<br />
D<br />
S<br />
P T C<br />
E D P P C A<br />
S V W I R U<br />
A A C N D<br />
E<br />
P I F<br />
V<br />
● F M S C S G<br />
N C S C<br />
1 I O G D<br />
S “<br />
N L M L<br />
O “ T I<br />
L J O<br />
W M L “<br />
O M A A<br />
A O A G<br />
D R E A P<br />
H E H<br />
F T P S D<br />
* E F G H C<br />
S D R B F A A
m<br />
C<br />
WHY HAS THE PRESIDENT NOT EXERCISED THIS OPTION IF THE SITUATION<br />
IS AS BAD AS SOME ARE LED TO BELIEVE?”<br />
“BUT, MR. PRESIDENT, ALL OF THAT HAS BEEN ARGUED PREVIOUSLY. ”<br />
“A KEY REASON WE SHOULD NOT PROCEED IS THAT WE CAN’T AFFORD<br />
IT, OH YES, I HAVE HEARD THE LIMP EXCUSE THAT THIS $100 MILLION<br />
WIIJL NOT COST THE TAXPAYERS ANYTHING, OR INCREASE THE RUNAWAY<br />
ANNUAL DEFICIT OF $200 MILLION OR THE MUSHROOMING NATIONAL DEBT<br />
OF $2.3 TRILLION BECAUSE THIS LITTLE $100 MILLION IS SMALL<br />
POTATOES AS A PART OF THE WHOLE, AND ANYWAY<br />
THESE FUNDS ARE<br />
ALF:EADY APPROPRIATED AND ARE JUST LANGUISHING AROUND OVER AT THE<br />
PENITAGON WAITING TO BE SPENT. AS A MEMBER OF THE BUDGET AND<br />
AN[ED SERVICES COMMITTEES, RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF ~L OF THIS<br />
MADNESS, I FIND SUCH AN EXPLANATION THE MOST LUDICROUS OF ALL!”<br />
“THE BEST KEPT SECRET IN THE COUNTRY IS WHO ARE THE “BIG<br />
SPENDERS” IN WASHINGTON. EVERYONE KNOWS PRESIDENT REAGAN IS A<br />
“CONSERVATIVE. u HE SAYS SO AND HIS OBEDIENT SERVANTS FOLLOW HIM<br />
AND BASK IN HIS “OLD STYLE”, PAY AS YOU GO, Philosophy. IT’S A<br />
GIVEN. THE FACT THAT THE FACTS PROVE THE CONTWRY IS OF NO<br />
CONSEQUENCE. YOU GOTTA BELIEVE! “<br />
“ B G “<br />
C S ” M F C<br />
I P S<br />
G<br />
R<br />
M G “<br />
SPENDING AND VIEW THEIR VOTES ON THE $100<br />
-
<strong>News</strong><br />
. / Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
●<br />
L T A<br />
E S C A M P<br />
W S JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />
Senate Appropriations Committee approved legislation to allow<br />
completion of the North LOUP project and provide over $27 million<br />
in 198’7 a v w p N<br />
c<br />
w p i b E<br />
W A w a C<br />
p<br />
W<br />
e m c<br />
N p a<br />
a m n c p S<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> Z previously u S E N<br />
R S r N f<br />
n m A f n<br />
c s s e a p<br />
haclb<br />
c<br />
Committee d C E<br />
correct a w q p a<br />
F c p<br />
o<br />
a<br />
e P p<br />
a p a A C<br />
--MORE--<br />
p
USS JJ EXON<br />
\iAIf ER PROJECTS<br />
members Tuesday to ensu~e that the Pap io Creek correction would<br />
be<br />
included in the bill.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill designates $2 million for construction of the Papio<br />
Creek project near Omaha and $421,000 for operations and<br />
maintenance OC the watershed. Also included was $1 million in<br />
construction funding for the ,59mile Missouri National Recreation<br />
River project.<br />
FOC t>~]er~tionand maintenance the bill earmarks $1.05<br />
million for Harlan County Lake, $6,1 million for the Gavins Point<br />
Dam, $50,000 for the Missouri<br />
River, and $526~000 for the Salt<br />
{~~e[+’k all(lits tributaries.<br />
Studies receiving funding include $1.38 million for the<br />
O’Neill Alternative, $401,000 for the Prairie Bend feasibility<br />
study, and $145,000 for the Salt Creek and its tributaries.<br />
--30--<br />
COMMITTEEONARMEDSERVICES<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510-6050<br />
oFFICIALBUSINESS
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
0 Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
R F A<br />
E C W<br />
W D .C . S ( a<br />
l s s r c p t<br />
c p h f<br />
s p n r<br />
R a p a m c<br />
s C o e F<br />
f D A<br />
f a s W<br />
c f B<br />
p p A c<br />
o s s a<br />
END
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
Jim E
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R Thursday, August 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />
——— EXON : POLL RESULTS SHOW NEED FOR CHANGE IN FARM PROGRAM<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB)<br />
results of the wheat poll referendum “point to a call by farmers for<br />
a change in the Administrationr s current farm program.”<br />
“<strong>The</strong> 69 percent approval of production controls by Nebraska<br />
farmers<br />
indicates they are fed up with a farm bill which, by specific<br />
design, drives down commodity prices,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said that the Administration will try to discredit the<br />
● referendum results because they run contrary to the Presidentfs farm<br />
program. ‘<strong>The</strong>ir program is failing in three ways. It has increased<br />
taxpayers costs per year for agriculture from $11 billion in 1981 to<br />
an estimated $30 billion in <strong>1986</strong>, cut in half exports, and is driving<br />
family farmers off the land at a rate faster than any time in<br />
histor~y,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
‘Those of us who opposed the President’s concept from its<br />
inception will now have the farmers expressions to pressure the<br />
Adm~inist~ation to take corrective action and write a new bill as soon<br />
as possible,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Exc)nsaid the positive referendum results also indicate the need<br />
●<br />
agriculture<br />
for th~>Department of Agriculture to conduct a binding poll on all<br />
products. <strong>The</strong> poll results announced on Friday were<br />
nonbinding and involved wheat farmers only.<br />
- -<br />
f<br />
i
N<br />
.<br />
●<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
L<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For ReILease,Wednesay, August 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATE PASSES BILL CURTAILING COST OF FORMER PRESIDENTS<br />
—. —<br />
WA~;HINGTON, D.CO -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate has approved a measure<br />
cospon~;ored by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) limiting federal spending<br />
Eor former U.S. Presidents.<br />
Th(>legislation (S.1047) which curtails spending on former<br />
presid(>nts office allowances and secret service protection was<br />
unanimously approved Friday.<br />
“This legislation will take important steps in reclucing the<br />
unrestrained spending on our former presidents,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong><br />
spending for the former presidents now exceeds the $22 m a<br />
o i P o<br />
a F s f p “<br />
1<br />
g $ e m<br />
l would put a limit of $300,000 annually for office<br />
staff and allowances<br />
for each of the first four years after leaving<br />
office. In the fifth year after leaving office the annual amount<br />
declines to $250,’000 until the ninth year when it falls again to<br />
,..,.,<br />
$200,000 annually. Each March the former presidents must also submit<br />
a repo~t detailing<br />
how the funds were spent.<br />
‘This is a time of fiscal restraint<br />
-<br />
f
USS<br />
C SPENDING BY FORMER PRESIDENTS<br />
government, ” s r f<br />
p c t s C r<br />
s t f g r b<br />
d<br />
a<br />
s p f EunclsE~om<br />
p p i g p<br />
i p m w f p<br />
r i or o c<br />
legislation states a former president would have automatic<br />
around the clock Secret Service protection for five years instead of<br />
for life. <strong>The</strong> Secret Service w a a p<br />
f P s c s<br />
a c y<br />
--30--<br />
COMMITf’CEONARMEDOIRVICE$<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510-6060<br />
OFFICIALBUSINESS
I<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
,<strong>News</strong><br />
.Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Monday, August 18, <strong>1986</strong><br />
AIRPOFITGRANTS<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
were informed Monday that airport improvement grants totalling<br />
$90,900 have a N c<br />
F A A i s<br />
T a a a $<br />
p l r a i f a f<br />
r e M a a $<br />
9<br />
a i f a r e<br />
-
J“im<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Rc?1ease ~ Thursday, August 21, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—.— COMMONWEALTH .-.. .————— INCLUDED IN TAX REFORM CONFERENCE REpORT<br />
L1:EICOJ. N “ NEBR . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said the Tax Reform<br />
Bill :Ipprovedby the Joint Senate-House Conference includes a<br />
‘provision for Commonwealth<br />
Savings depositors.<br />
<strong>The</strong> provision would allow individual depositors at Lincoln’s<br />
insolt’entCommonwealth Savings to write off their lost deposits as<br />
tax dc:ductions. <strong>Exon</strong> fought to ensure this provision was included in<br />
the Senate version of the Tax Reform Bill.<br />
o<br />
“This new provision puts individuals and businesses on the same<br />
basis for claiming thei~ losses from the Commonwealth Savings<br />
colla~se,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Current law permits individuals to deduct only a maximum of<br />
$3,000 per year for their lost deposits while businesses can write<br />
off nearly all their loss in a single year.<br />
‘This measure provides some essential tax relief for Commonwealth<br />
depositors who are only now beginning to recover a portion of their<br />
deposits,M<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> benefit of this provision would vary depending on the amount<br />
of taxable income each depositor<br />
has to write off the loss.<br />
<strong>The</strong> final version of the Tax Reform Bill must now be approved by<br />
*<br />
both the House of Representatives and the Senate before being sent to<br />
,<br />
the President.<br />
--END--
.) Jim -<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Hxon,~<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Wednesday, August 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />
GRANT TO HELP STATE BUSINESSES GET DEFENSE CONTRACTS<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY<br />
were informed today that the Nebraska Department of Economic<br />
Development has been selected to establish a technical assistance<br />
center to aid Nebraska businesses in competing for defense<br />
contracts.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Defense Logistics Agency under the Department of Defense<br />
awarded the Nebraska Department of Economic Development $46r222<br />
toward setting up the center. <strong>The</strong> federal funds will be matched<br />
with $82,000 in state funds.<br />
<strong>The</strong> funds will be used to establish a procurement outreach<br />
center at North Platte. <strong>The</strong> center will provide techincal<br />
assistance and military specifications and standards to Nebraska<br />
businesses to enable them to better compete for Defense<br />
Department contracts, according to the senators.<br />
--end--
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
MEDIA ADVISORY<br />
TUESDAY, AUGUST 26, <strong>1986</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
LINCOLN , NEBR . -- AT THE REQUEST OF U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND<br />
ED ZORINSKY THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE WILL HOLD A FIELD HEARING<br />
IN LIN”COLN TO REVIEW THE IMPACT OF THE FARM BILL ON NEBRASKA’S<br />
ECONON;Y.<br />
THE HEARING IS SCHEDULED FOR THURSDAY, AUGUST 28TH, AT 9 AT<br />
THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN, EAST CAMPUS UNION, IN THE GREAT<br />
PLAINS ROOM. SENATORS EXON AND ZORINSKY WILL BOTH BE IN ATTENDANCE AT<br />
THE HEARING.<br />
●<br />
NEBRASKA’S TWO U.S. SENATORS ARRANGED FOR THE HEARING AT THE<br />
URGING OF THE NEBRASKA LEGISLATURE AND FARM GROUPS.<br />
SCHEDULED TO TESTIFY ARE INDIVIDUAL FARMERS, REPRESENTATIVES FROM<br />
THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN, STATE OF NEBRASKA AND NEBRASKA<br />
LEGISLATURE. IN ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE SCHEDULED TO<br />
TESTIFY: NEBRASKA FARMERS UNION, NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU, AMERICAN<br />
AGRICULTURAL MOVEMENT, NEBRASKA WHEAT GROWERS, NEBRASKA CORN GROWERS,<br />
NE:BRASKA WIFE, NEBRASKA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, FARM CRISIS COMMITTEE,<br />
NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION, NEBRASKA GRANGE, NEBRASKA LIVESTOCK<br />
FEEDERS, NEBRASKA STOCK GROWERS, MID-AMERICA DAIRYMEN, NEBRASKA PORK<br />
PRODUCERS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FARMER-ELECTED COMMITTEEMEN,<br />
AGRICULTURAL COUNCIL OF NEBRASKA, NEBRASKA GRAIN SORGHUM ASSOCIATION,<br />
● GRAIN<br />
NEBRASKA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION, NEBRASKA COOPERATIVE COUNCIL, NEBRASKA<br />
AND FEED DEALERS, FARM CREDIT BANKS OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA GASOHOL<br />
COMMITTEE AND OTHERS.<br />
--END--
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R W S<br />
3 1<br />
. P H A<br />
W S<br />
I<br />
w i W N r<br />
m a f p h<br />
D H D i<br />
s O r $ a<br />
I<br />
acquire 25 public housing units. Alliance, Nebraska will receive<br />
I ●) $ a 6 a 5 u<br />
6<br />
Z
- Jlm M330<br />
Nebraska<br />
U S I m<br />
e<br />
Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
For Rc>lease, September 5, <strong>1986</strong><br />
To: CIIRIS AMES<br />
A1.COHOL UPDATE<br />
FROM : MARK BOWEN<br />
SENATOR JIM EXON ‘S OFFICE<br />
RE : STATEMENT BY SENATOR EXON TO ALCOHOL UPDATE<br />
01?USDA REPORT: FUEL ETHANOL & AG: AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- “Not only is the USDA’s Fuel Ethanol<br />
and Agriculture report is another slap in the face for America’s<br />
farme]:s, it’s based on faulty assumptions.”<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> ethanol market is good for the farm economy and the<br />
whole nation because it makes us less dependent on foreign oil.”<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> Department’s conclusion that it would be more economical<br />
to increase farm subsidies and discontinue ethanol programs runs<br />
contrary to what farmers want. America’s farmers don’t want more<br />
direct government subsidies - they want a fair price for their<br />
commodities. Ethanol production is one of the tools we should be<br />
using to help them get a better price. Ethanol represents a<br />
growing market for farm commodities and it makes no sense to<br />
undermine that market,” Senator <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
-
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
0’ Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Tuesday, September 9, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATORS HOLD PURSE STRINGS TO PREVENT CLOSING LINCOLN OFFICE<br />
——<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEBR) said the<br />
1987 Agriculture Appropriations Bill includes language to prevent<br />
th~~U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from moving the Lincoln<br />
Soil Conservation Service Technical Center to Fort Worth, Texas.<br />
Nebraska Senators Jim <strong>Exon</strong> and Ed Zorinsky and the senators<br />
from Oregon and Pennsylvania objected to the USDA effort to<br />
combine centers in the three states into one office located in<br />
Texas.<br />
o’<br />
<strong>The</strong> language included in the appropriations bill states that<br />
no funds shall be spent to consolidate equipment, personnel, or<br />
se]:vices of the Soil Conservation Service’s national technical<br />
centers in Portlandr Oregon; Lincoln, Nebraska; Chester,<br />
Pennsylvania; and Fort Worth, Texas into a single national<br />
technical center.<br />
‘This legislation was drafted because the USDA was giving<br />
primary attention to filling positions in Fort Worth, but not the<br />
other centers,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “After reports that the USDA was<br />
continuing its consolidation efforts through a back door approach<br />
we moved to block it by preventing any funding from being used<br />
for this purpose,” he added.<br />
Th,~reare currently more than 100 employees in the Lincoln<br />
office. <strong>Exon</strong> and the other senators have contended that it is<br />
mol:e effective to keep these regional offices located in the<br />
areas they serve rather than consolidate them at Texas.<br />
Th(~appropriations<br />
bill now awaits action by the full Senate.<br />
-<br />
nr86.100
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
FO1?RELEASE, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />
HOIJSE SUBCOMMITTEE APPROVES WILDERNESS BILL<br />
——<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C. --- <strong>The</strong> House Public Lands Subcommittee Thursday<br />
ap]?roved U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S legislation to p<br />
S C a N N F C<br />
s I C C S (<br />
b d force in the House of Representatives behind this<br />
legislation.<br />
<strong>The</strong> House subcommittee made only one minor change in the<br />
legislation which was to rename the Pine Ridge area a ‘national<br />
recreation area~ instead of it carrying the name “national wilderness<br />
area.” <strong>The</strong> 6,600 acre Pine Ridge Recreation Area and 8,100 acre<br />
Soldier Creek Wilderness Area would both have the same type of<br />
protections for the future. <strong>The</strong>y would also both have the same type<br />
of noxious weed, insect and fire control.<br />
Congressman Seiberling, House Subcommittee Chairman, cleared with<br />
Senator <strong>Exon</strong> the proposed name change the day before the subcommittee<br />
met. Seiberling wrote “This proposal may be worth considering as a<br />
means of expediting the bill as we near the end of this Congress with<br />
so much legislation awaiting action in a very limiting time.n He<br />
added~ “I would not advocate even this minor change to the<br />
Senate-passed bill without your consideration.”<br />
“<strong>The</strong> designation of a National Recreation area for Pine Ridge<br />
af:fords protection essentially identical to that of a Wilderness<br />
designation,v <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> full House Interior Committee is expected to approve the bill<br />
next week.<br />
-
a<br />
. ] Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Thursday, September 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />
DECISON OF NEBR. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ON SCENIC RIVER<br />
—.—<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- “I am pleased that the Nebraska Natural<br />
Resources Commission has recognized the need to protect the state<br />
trf2asUre Of the Niobrara River. <strong>The</strong> Commission has come a long<br />
way from its initial opposition and has completed the task we<br />
asked them to undertake last December by conducting its study and<br />
today endorsing its informative report on the Niobrara. That<br />
●<br />
ci]:culated<br />
report will knock down the many misconceptions which have been<br />
about this proposal,” <strong>Exon</strong> said Thursday regarding the<br />
Nebraska Natural Resources Commission action on the Scenic River<br />
Designation<br />
study.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> Commission’s call for local involvement in protecting<br />
th
I<br />
I<br />
Jim —— <strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
Fo:rRelease, Friday, September 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATE APPROVES AVIATION SAFETY STUDY<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate has approved<br />
legislation (S.2417) cosponsored by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON<br />
establishing a Blue Ribbon Commission to study ways to improve<br />
aviation safety.<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislation would create the Aviation Safety<br />
Commission, composed of seven members appointed by the President<br />
with the advice of Congress. <strong>The</strong> Commission would conduct an<br />
in--depthstudy of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and<br />
its responsibility to ensure aviation Safety.<br />
●<br />
ai]:craftmaintenance<br />
<strong>The</strong> FAA currently has the dual responsibility to promote<br />
commercial aviation and also ensure that it is safe. “We want<br />
to make sure that the enforcement of safety regulations and<br />
are not taking a back seat to the promotion<br />
of aviation by the FAA,V <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>Exon</strong> is the ranking<br />
Democratic member of the Senate Aviation Subcommittee.<br />
<strong>The</strong> study will examine whether the FAA has provided<br />
sufficient resources to ensure aviation safety and if the FAA<br />
should be reorganized. <strong>The</strong> Commission would also be directed to<br />
make recommendations of how to improve enforcement of FAA safety<br />
regulations.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> enormous number of serious aviation incidents<br />
demonstrates the need for this study,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. ‘<strong>The</strong> FAA has<br />
a responsibility to ensure that airline companies are not<br />
cutting corners on airplane maintenance schedules at the expense<br />
of safety requirements= It also must ensure that there are a<br />
sufficient number of FAA inspectors and air traffic controllers<br />
and that the agency is meeti~g its responsibility to develop an<br />
c a s f p s<br />
a<br />
-
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release , Fr iday, September 12, <strong>1986</strong><br />
— NE13RASKANS NOMINATIONS APPROVED<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C . -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON and ED ZORINSKY<br />
said Friday the U.S. Senate has approved the nominations of two<br />
Nebraskans.<br />
Janice L. Gradwohl, Lancaster County Judge, was approved by<br />
the U*S. Senate to serve on the Board of Directors of the State<br />
Justice Institute. She will serve a three year term on the<br />
board. <strong>The</strong> institute reviews the operation of state court<br />
sy:;tems.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Senate also approved the reappointment of Thomas A.<br />
O’Hara of Omaha for a four year term as U.S. Marshall in<br />
Nebraska.<br />
–-end--
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
I<br />
I<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Thursday, September 18, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON COAUTHORS PORK-BUSTER AMENDMENT TO CONTROL SPENDING<br />
.—— ..<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) will join<br />
Senator Dan Quayle (R-IND) in offering the “pork bustern amendment to<br />
allow I:hePresident to cut pork barrel spending from appropriations<br />
bills by improving the spending rescission process.<br />
<strong>The</strong> amendment would guarantee that Congress specifically vote on<br />
the Prc:sident’s spending rescission messages within ten days after the<br />
Presid[>nt signs an appropriations bill. Under current law, the<br />
Congress is not required to vote on a Presidential rescission<br />
request. If the Congress does not act within 45 days the rescission<br />
is voicland the money must be spent under current law. <strong>The</strong> Senators<br />
intend to offer the amendment to the Budget Reconciliation Bill.<br />
9<br />
“This amendment would put a stop to the unrestrained s~endinu on<br />
pork barrel projects that increase ~he federal budget defi~it,n ~xon<br />
said, who is a fiscally conservative member of the Senate Budget<br />
Committee.<br />
‘This pork buster amendment shines the light on spending<br />
provisions hidden in the dark cracks of appropriations bills much<br />
the lirle-item veto legislation would, and gives the President a<br />
guarantee the Congress will vote on his recommendations to cut<br />
unnecessary spending,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>Exon</strong> is a cosponsor of the<br />
legislation to give the President line-item veto authority.<br />
like<br />
<strong>The</strong> amendment improves the current rescission process and could<br />
“produc’esubstantial federal savings,w according to <strong>Exon</strong>. He noted<br />
that in the last two years the President has submitted more than 320<br />
rescissions, but none have been voted on by the Senate.<br />
President’s hands are tied in many appropriations bills<br />
because even though they may contain unnecessary pork barrel projects<br />
he cannot knockout individual items,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “This pork buster<br />
amendment would allow the President to prepare a rescission message<br />
specifying the items he objects to in a particular appropriations bill<br />
and be assured the that the Congress will vote up or down on those<br />
items,v he added.<br />
●<br />
unnecessary<br />
“<strong>The</strong> pork buster amendment will help eliminate pork barrel<br />
politics and make the Congress more responsible to stop this<br />
spending,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. <strong>The</strong> amendment has been endorsed by<br />
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.<br />
-
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224.4224<br />
R W Septefier 17, <strong>1986</strong><br />
~ A I G<br />
W C . S Z<br />
i W a A N<br />
a a a $ g<br />
F A A i s<br />
t g w i d r<br />
a p a t A a<br />
F g A I P<br />
a w f p t a<br />
f a a O<br />
- -
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Thursday, September 18, 1<br />
EXON TO VOTE AGAINST- REHNQUIST -<br />
—<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. --- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said Wednesday<br />
prior to Senate action that he would vote against William H.<br />
Rehnquist for the position of Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme<br />
Court.<br />
q J R q<br />
i p j p<br />
s b r d Nor is there anything<br />
wrong with having a conservative or even a strong conservative as<br />
a chief justice,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“I will vote against elevating him to the position of Chief<br />
Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and top jurist of the American<br />
court system because I am concerned about his lack of full<br />
credibility, sometimes reliability and most all his seeming<br />
inability to be an effective consensus developer which is an<br />
important requirement to be chief justice,~ <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“A chief justice should be chosen by near acclamation. I<br />
think the vote will indicate clearly that he will not be selected<br />
by acclamation because there are many who have serious objections<br />
about whether he is the best individual in the United States to<br />
be Chief Justice for the decades ahead,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“<strong>The</strong>re is nothing wrong with his service or his remaining on<br />
the Supreme Court, but I don’t think he is the best person to be<br />
moved up to this position,n <strong>Exon</strong> said. “I hope that if he is<br />
confirmed he grows in the position and becomes a great chief<br />
justice,” he added.<br />
--30--
Jim<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224.4224<br />
. R T S<br />
C U O<br />
W S ,<br />
i T a c<br />
Z<br />
a a m c Corp. of Engineers.<br />
s E C<br />
O a a $ c u c<br />
w p O F O C<br />
D 1<br />
-
Nebraska<br />
“ Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Saturday, September 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON s~,ysDEFICIT REDUCTION EFFORT IS PHONY<br />
————<br />
WA~jHINGTON, D .C ‘ U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEBR) F<br />
f “ G n b b<br />
d d B R<br />
c R r<br />
b d c G d t<br />
“phony, ridiculous<br />
and attempts<br />
to fool the public.”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> is a<br />
a<br />
)<br />
fiscally conservative member of the Senate Budget Committee.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> Reconciliation package is totally unrealistic. It is an<br />
abomination which only shifts money back and forth and in and out of<br />
the fiscal year. It only allows the deficit and national debt to<br />
grow, not shrink,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Exc)npointed out that Gramm-Rudman law promised to reduce the<br />
budget deficit to $144 billion in 1987, but the deficit will more<br />
likely be $170 billion<br />
next year.<br />
“Gramm-Rudman and the Reconciliation package are smoke and<br />
mirrors. <strong>The</strong> federal government is not and will not meet the deficit<br />
target levels this year, next year or even the year after,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“Gramm-Rudman is pushing the budget deficit the wrong way.<br />
Claiming that the Reconciliation Bill will reduce the deficit is a<br />
fraud c)nthe public. Continuing to make such false promises will turn<br />
●)<br />
the<br />
will of the people against its government,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“I have not and do not support the ruse called Gramm-Rudman. It<br />
MORE
USS EXON<br />
DEFICIT REDUCTION<br />
a d p a e<br />
e c g b d p<br />
s G f r<br />
p p b y r G a<br />
f s “ n u<br />
a b d f f a<br />
l i a<br />
f G m a f d<br />
r b l b e<br />
d “ l C must<br />
reality. <strong>The</strong>re are only two options. <strong>The</strong> Congress will have to<br />
either repeal the proven unworkable Gramm-Rudman law or massively<br />
increase taxes. In the meantime the deficit problem remains and the<br />
national debt steadily mushrooms,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
--30--<br />
NR86.109
Nebraska<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-42M<br />
Fo’rRelease, Saturday, September 20, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— QUAYLE -EXOIJPORKBUSTER — AMENDMENT<br />
WAS HINGrl’ON , D .C . --- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Friday evening, by 6 to 3<br />
bllockedthe “porkbuster” amendment offered by U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON<br />
(D-NEB) AND DAN QUAYLE (R-IND) which would have allowed the President<br />
to cut pork barrel spending from appropriations bills. <strong>The</strong> amendment<br />
was offered to the Budget Reconciliation Bill.<br />
‘Hiding special interest pork barrel spending in appropriations<br />
bills is an age old practice used because the money cannot be stopped<br />
by the President without vetoing the entire bill,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. ‘<strong>The</strong><br />
Quayle-<strong>Exon</strong> amendment would give the President the knife to cut pork<br />
barrel spending from an appropriations bill, much like the line item<br />
veto would workl” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
I<br />
Under current law the President may request Congress reduce<br />
spending for a particular program by preparing a ‘rescission m@ssag’@~”<br />
but Congress is not required to act on the request. Present law<br />
states if Congress does not act on a “rescission message” within 45<br />
days, the request is void and the money must be spent.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Quayle-<strong>Exon</strong> amendment would have guaranteed that Congress<br />
specifically vote on a spending ‘rescission message” within ten days<br />
after the President signs an appropriations bill containing the<br />
unwanted items.<br />
‘C!ongresshas been able to avoid the President’s rescission<br />
messages because Congress is not required to act on the requests to<br />
cut spending,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> porkbuster provision would have helped eliminate pork barrel<br />
politics. We must prevent unnecessary spending which only increases<br />
the ncltionaldebt,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> amendment was endorsed by the U.S. C<br />
National Farm Bureau Federation and the National<br />
of C<br />
Association of<br />
h<br />
Realtc)rs.<br />
-<br />
O<br />
N
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
0’ Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
, ,<br />
.1 Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
For Release, Monday, September 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—.— EXON CONSIDERS AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE INTERSTATE SPEED LIMIT<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C.. -- U .S. SENATOR JIM EXON is considering<br />
offering an amendment to allow states to increase the rural<br />
interstate<br />
speed limit to 65 mph.<br />
Earlier this year <strong>Exon</strong> introduced similar legislation to<br />
increase interstate speed limits. His initial proposal spurred<br />
efforts in Congress to give states the option to raise interstate<br />
speeds. <strong>The</strong> amendment would be offered to the <strong>1986</strong> Federal Aid<br />
Highway Bill.<br />
0’<br />
<strong>The</strong> potential amendment would permit states to raise the<br />
speed limit on rural interstates to a maximum of 65 mph without<br />
losing federal highway funds. <strong>The</strong> amendment would not change the<br />
mph speed limit on prima~y and secondary roads.<br />
“Now that the president is back on board for giving the<br />
states greater authority in setting the speed limits, I am<br />
confident we can change the currently ignored speed limit law.”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> state enforcement statistics clearly show that<br />
motorists are not obeying the 55 mph and that it is not being<br />
enforced,”<br />
he added.<br />
“It is obvious from the statistics and driving the<br />
interstates that the unofficial speed limit is between 65 and 70<br />
mph,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
●’ <strong>The</strong> Highway Bill is expected to be considered by the Senate<br />
before its scheduled adjournment on October 3rd.<br />
-
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224.4224<br />
For Rg~l~ase,Monday, September 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />
——. EXON [JNSNARLSWILDERNESS BILL<br />
1<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEF3)Monday<br />
un~rav~?leda snarl that developed between the House of<br />
Representatives and Senate over the modified <strong>Exon</strong> Wilderness<br />
Bill.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were threats circulating in the Senate Monday that the<br />
Wilderness Bill which was modified in the House of<br />
●<br />
occurred<br />
Representatives would be pigeonholed in the Senate. <strong>The</strong> threats<br />
because of the one line name change of the Pine Ridge<br />
desigfi,ationfrom a wilderness area to a recreation<br />
Mcnday <strong>Exon</strong> intervened and talked with both Senator Jim<br />
McClure (R-ID), chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural<br />
Resources Committee, and Representative John Seiberling (D-OH),<br />
chairman of the House Interior Committee, to resolve the problem.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> received assurances from McClure that the bill would not<br />
be delayed<br />
in the Senate due to the change.<br />
“Senator McClure’s assurances that the bill will not be<br />
delayed indicates that Nebraska can expect Senate approval of the<br />
Wilderness Bill before Congress adjourns in Octoberr” <strong>Exon</strong> Said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill designates<br />
the 6,600 acres of the Pine Ridge area as<br />
a national recreation area and the 8,100 acre Soldier Creek area<br />
● a national wilderness area. -
For Release, Tuesday, September 23, <strong>1986</strong><br />
——— MAKE AGRICULTURE EXPORTS TOP PRIORITY AT TRADE TALKS<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) is urging the<br />
President to make agriculture trade a top priority in the current<br />
round of General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) negotiations.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> growing yearly trade deficit and the impending agricultural<br />
trade deficit strengthen the forces of protectionism. Unless<br />
significant progress is made toward opening markets to American<br />
products and toward free and fair competition in the world market,<br />
protectionism may become Americars new reality,” Senators <strong>Exon</strong> and<br />
Lawton Chiles (D-FLA) said in a letter to the President.<br />
●<br />
To<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> United States must become a tough negotiator with our trading<br />
partners,” they said. “While we have failed to open markets, other<br />
nations have enjoyed virtually unlimited access to American markets.<br />
maintain our competitive position we must threaten to limit access<br />
to American markets if foreign nations do not open theirs.”<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> last three months of trade deficits in agriculture underscore<br />
the critical need to reduce and reverse the debilitating trends that<br />
haflestifled our export markets over the past six years,” <strong>Exon</strong> and<br />
Chiles said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> two pointed out that since 1980 agricultural exports have<br />
fallen by 40 percent. During the same period, imports increased by 20<br />
percent. “As a result, the U.S. trade surplus in agriculture has<br />
declined from $26.6 billion in 1980 to monthly deficits in <strong>1986</strong>.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se shocking figures highlight the worst U.S. agricultural trade<br />
performance in 14 years. Since the 1985 Farm Bill became law, the<br />
situation has worsened,~ the two senators said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> senators, both Senate Budget Committee members, said the GATT<br />
enforct:ment powers should be streamlined and strengthened. <strong>The</strong>y said<br />
under ~>xisting procedures an offending nation can stall GATT nearly<br />
indefinitely because of vague language. <strong>The</strong>y said independent experts<br />
could be used to arbitrate disputes between nations and recommended<br />
that specific and enforceable definitions of key phrases be added to<br />
clear up the current vague language.<br />
0 nr86.11.3<br />
--30--
Nebraska<br />
●’ Jim E;on <strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Thursday, September 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SEIVATEAPPROVES INCREASING RURAL INTERSTATE SPEED LIMITS<br />
——.——— ——<br />
WASHINGTON, D .C . -- <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Tuesday night<br />
overwhelmingly approved an amendment cosponsored by U.S. SENATOR JIM<br />
EX~3N (D-NEB) o i i<br />
m h a F<br />
H<br />
a<br />
“ s l r i a<br />
a s S c m<br />
t b r<br />
s a p a E l<br />
i A w s e C i<br />
r i s l<br />
a would give states the option to increase the speed<br />
limit on rural interstates to 65 mph. Rural interstates are those<br />
outside of towns with a 50,000 population or more.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> lead a successful effort to reject an amendment by U.S.<br />
Senator Chic Hecht (R-NEV) to include raising the federal limit to 65<br />
mph on all roads. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Democrat argued that raising the<br />
speed l~t on primary and secondary two lane only roads would impair<br />
safety.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> 55 mph limit on interstates is probably the most violated<br />
law in history,v <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Sixty-five on rural interstates is a<br />
mol:e reasonable speed limit, especially on the wide open stretches of<br />
the rnidwest and west,m he added.<br />
‘Interstate are among the safest roads in the nation. <strong>The</strong><br />
amf~ndment will restore the original intent of the interstate system<br />
which incorporates safety designs with reasonable higher speed<br />
l<br />
s<br />
a a F H a<br />
j c H R<br />
nr86.114<br />
-
3 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
I<br />
For Rt~lease, Thursday, September 25, <strong>1986</strong><br />
NEBRASKA PROJECTS IN TAX REFORM BILL<br />
—.—.<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Five Nebraska projects are included in<br />
the TzlxReform Bill transition rules according to U.S. Senators<br />
Jim ElConand Ed Zorinsky.<br />
●<br />
being<br />
bill includes three Lincoln and two Omaha projects. <strong>The</strong><br />
Lincoln projects include: (1) the ‘Waterpark” development at 29th<br />
& A Streets which is a former water and power plant being<br />
converted into a 41-unit condominium housing project; (2) the<br />
“H.P. B c N S a<br />
w b c into an office and retail complex; and<br />
(3) the “Stacy Fruit BuildingU at 8th & F Streets is a warehouse<br />
converted into office and retail space. <strong>The</strong> H.P.<br />
S F b l L H<br />
d<br />
Tt~eOmaha projects include the ‘McKesson-Robbins Project” at<br />
9th & Farnam Streets. It is a warehouse being converted into a<br />
135 unit housing project in downtown Omaha which is part of the<br />
Central Park Mall Development. <strong>The</strong> second project is the “City<br />
National Bank Buildingw at 16th & Harney Streets which is being<br />
colnve]:tedinto 130 residential housing units.<br />
‘(completion of these projects is important to’the economies<br />
of Lirlcoln and Omaha because they will provide additional<br />
housir~g, create jobs and expand the cities tax base,w the<br />
senators said:<br />
N
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
.<br />
m<br />
R T S<br />
C G I ~<br />
W , D .C . S Z<br />
a t a a $ c<br />
b c c C<br />
A P G I<br />
C<br />
c<br />
G<br />
I<br />
a<br />
A<br />
f e 4 c<br />
l k s c<br />
c “ s<br />
c c c<br />
s c i<br />
a f c e e c<br />
E P A o<br />
- -<br />
H<br />
N
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Saturday, September 27, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON W’OTESAGAINST T~X RE~ORM BILL ‘<br />
—————.<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB), a<br />
fiscally conservative member of the Senate Budget Committee,<br />
voted against the Tax Reform Bill saying it could reduce federal<br />
revenue and add to the budget deficit.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> main problem with this measure is that it will, in my<br />
●<br />
and<br />
best judgment, cause an overall net reduction in federal revenue<br />
thereby drive the country further towards the brink of<br />
economic disaster,” <strong>Exon</strong> said in a speech on the Senate floor<br />
prior<br />
to the vote.<br />
‘This tax reform bill very likely will tighten the noose<br />
around the throat of America’s economic viability in these times<br />
of skyrocketing budget deficits and an exploding national debt,”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nebraska senator said he made his decision to vote<br />
against the bill in the final hour before the Tax Reform Bill<br />
was voted on by the Senate.<br />
-<br />
NR86.117<br />
a
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
3 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Monday, September 29, <strong>1986</strong><br />
LOAN AUTHORITY FOR HOUSING UNITS IN NEBRASKA<br />
—.———<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND<br />
ED ZORINSKY<br />
were informed Monday afternoon that Nebraska will receive more<br />
thzin$2 million in loan authority to construct housing units for<br />
th{~mentally<br />
ill and the disabled.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Department of Housing and Urban Development notified the<br />
senators that Mercy Housing Inc. of Omaha will receive $490,200<br />
to construct 16 units for the chronically mentally ill. Central<br />
a<br />
Nebraska Goodwill Industries of Grand Island will receive<br />
$1,199,000 for 37 units for the same purpose.<br />
Th,2Great plains Chapter of Paralyzed Veterans in Omaha will<br />
rec:eive $676,800 to construct 16 units in Omaha specifically for<br />
the handicapped.<br />
--30--<br />
nr86.lL8
Nebraska<br />
“ Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Re:.ease, Tuesday, September 30, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATORS WIN AGREEMENT ON HYDROELECTRIC RELICENSING<br />
——-—<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATORS JIM EXON AND ED ZORINSKY have<br />
been successful in protecting Nebraska’s water, environmental and<br />
power ~.nterests in legislation covering the relicensing of<br />
hydroelectric power plants.<br />
Exc>nand Zorinsky personally met with Representative John Dingell<br />
(D-Mich) Tuesday and hammered out the final agreement clarifying the<br />
language in the bill to protect Nebraska. Dingell, chairman of the<br />
House Ilnergyand Commerce Committee, is the leader of the House<br />
conferc)es who had previously resisted clarifying the bill language.<br />
Nebraska’s two senators have been working for the past month to<br />
clarif>~ the House language which had been tentatively agreed to by the<br />
House-Senate Conference on the hydroelectric relicensing legislation.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Ho~lse language could have adversely affected Nebraska irrigators<br />
and electric ratepayers.<br />
<strong>The</strong>!Nebraska senators were concerned that the existing conference<br />
language would have required the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission<br />
(FERC) during the relicensing process to accept the recommendations of<br />
fish aridwildlife agencies regardless of the consequences for<br />
hydroelectric power or irrigation.<br />
<strong>The</strong> senators were able to convince the joint conference to clarify<br />
the cor~ference report language to ensure that during relicensing equal<br />
consideration be given to fish and wildlife, irrigation and electric<br />
power generation concerns. This would provide a balanced approach and<br />
prevent any one concern from being able to dictate license<br />
restrictions during the relicensing process.<br />
“Fish and wildlife concerns are important, but equally important<br />
is the continuing ability to provide power and irrigation for farm<br />
land,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Our successful effort ensures that all of the<br />
considerations will be taken into account in a balanced equitable<br />
manner when hydroelectric power plant licenses come up for renewal,”<br />
he added.<br />
Zorinsky said that the agreement worked out with the conferees<br />
protects Nebraska irrigators, recreation interests and<br />
conservationists as well as the power projects. “Under this agreement<br />
everybcdies interests will be addressed, with equal consideration<br />
MORE
EXON/ZORINSKY<br />
HYDROELECTRIC<br />
RELICENSING<br />
being given to fish and wildlife, irrigation and electric power ●<br />
generation,~ he said. Zorinsky, who earlier said he would filibuster<br />
the bill unless Nebraska’s interests were protected, indicated he will<br />
now withdraw his objections.<br />
<strong>The</strong> joint conference agreement is now expected to be approved by<br />
the full Senate and the House of Representatives. It will then be<br />
sent to the President for his approval.<br />
-
f<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
C M Bowen<br />
Telephone: 202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Wednesday, October 1, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON RETURNS UNUSED OFFICE FUNDS TO SENATE FOR EIGHTH YEAR<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON will return more<br />
than $140,000 in unused <strong>1986</strong> office funds to the U.S. Senate.<br />
In those eight years <strong>Exon</strong> has returned more ‘than $2.1<br />
million in unused funds to the U.S. Senate. This is the eighth<br />
consecutive year in a row that <strong>Exon</strong> has turned money back to the<br />
U.S. Senate.<br />
I?OK<strong>1986</strong>, the well-known fiscal conservative will return<br />
●’<br />
$117,616.09<br />
in unused office salary allotment. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska<br />
senators were allotted $910,878.00 for office salaries in <strong>1986</strong>.<br />
<strong>The</strong> $910,878.00 amount was reduced $39,168.00 to $871,710.00 as<br />
rec~uiredby the Gramm-Rudman<br />
law.<br />
So far in the <strong>1986</strong> calendar year <strong>Exon</strong> has spent only<br />
$16,799.03 of the $54,194.00 amount he is allotted for office<br />
expenses.<br />
“I’ve always run my offices on a tight budget. My office is<br />
small ~ut very efficient, just like government should be. It<br />
follows my philosophy that government should be fiscally<br />
conservative and not waste the taxpayers money,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
-<br />
a 1<br />
NR86.120
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
C M B<br />
T 2<br />
For Release, Thursday, October 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON URGES QUICK APPROVAL OF TEXAS AIR PURCHASE OF FRONTIER<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) has<br />
cosigned a letter with U.S. Senator Alan Simpson (R-WYO) and<br />
others urging the Secretary of Transportation Elizabeth Dole to<br />
expedite consideration of the Texas Air acquisitions of Frontier<br />
and People Express Airlines.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> is the ranking Democratic member of the Senate Aviation<br />
Subcommittee. <strong>Exon</strong> said approval of the acquisitions by October<br />
16th could restart Frontier with its 4,700 employees and avoid a<br />
total shut down of People Express and its 5,200 employees.<br />
Frontier employees have been laid off since August 24th, <strong>1986</strong>.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> direct livelihoods of many thousands of Frontier<br />
people Express employees and our other constituents who<br />
and<br />
indirectly depend upon the business and service generated by<br />
thase carriers are in very real jeopardy,” the senators said in<br />
the letter.<br />
“Quick approval of the Texas Air proposals will allow Texas<br />
Air’s subsidiary, Continental Airlines, to immediately reemploy<br />
Frontier’s employees and restart air service out of the Denver<br />
hub to Nebraska and other states,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
‘Clearly, the public interest in preserving employment, air<br />
service options and competition compels our request for expedited<br />
consideration of the proposed purchase. Faced with one carrier<br />
already struggling in bankruptcy and one teetering at the edge of<br />
survival, we do urge you to move quickly,n the senators told the<br />
Secretary of Transportation. ,,<br />
nr86.121<br />
-
●<br />
For Release, Thursday, October 2, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON SUPPORTS OVERRIDE OF SOUTH AFRICA SANCTIONS VETO<br />
——<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
C M B<br />
T 2<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) voted<br />
with the majority to override the President’s veto of the South<br />
Africa sanctions bill despite threats that South Africa may ban<br />
American grains. <strong>The</strong> veto was overridden by a vote of 78 to 21.<br />
“I was pleased with the strong vote. It was interesting<br />
that all of the farm senators, with the exception of South<br />
Dakota Senator Pressler, supported the override in the face of<br />
the threat of embargos that was issued last night by Mr. “Pik”<br />
Botha, Foreign Minister of South Africa, when he called the<br />
Republican cloakroom to lobby senators,U <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> reality is that 1985 grain exports to South Africa were<br />
less than one-half of one percent of the United States’ total<br />
grain exports,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “<strong>The</strong> effect of the Gramm-Rudman law<br />
t will cause far more harm to American agriculture than this small<br />
arnountf” he added.<br />
“Conditions in South Africa have not improved. Oppression<br />
and the violation of civil rights continues in South Africa and<br />
its time the United States did more than simply stand on the<br />
sidelines,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“Maybe now we will convince that Apartheid government in<br />
South Africa that the United States means business, not<br />
withstanding the objections of the President of the United<br />
States,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
nr86.122<br />
-<br />
.,.
●<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bow’en<br />
Telephone: 202-224-42U<br />
For Release, Saturday, October 4, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON AMENDMENTS TO CONTINUING RESOLUTION APPROVED<br />
——<br />
V7ASHINGTON, D.C. -- After scolding the Senate in a speech late<br />
Thursday night for its arcane procedures the U.S. Senate approved two<br />
of SE;NATOR JIM EXON’S amendments to the Continuing Resolution.<br />
E;xonwon approval of an amendment which would conform the papio<br />
Creek. flood control project to a revised plan which would reduce the<br />
cost from $120 million to $7 million. <strong>The</strong> cost reduction is possible<br />
becatlse local residents and state officials have endorsed a<br />
scaled-back version of the original project. <strong>The</strong> scaled-back plan<br />
will use channel improvements and electronic flood monitoring system<br />
instead of costly and controversial dams for flood control. - -<br />
“Not w t<br />
million,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “In every way this is a common sense<br />
approach,” he added. Senators <strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky have long sought<br />
these necessary changes in the law.<br />
A second amendment approved will resolve a water quality problem<br />
at Dam Site #18 of the Papio Creek project. Effluent from two<br />
upstream Sanitary Improvement Districts is preventing the dam from<br />
being filled because containment of the effluent in the dam could<br />
cause health problems. Early last year the Omaha-Douglas County Board<br />
of Health recommended a t r a<br />
c b r<br />
f<br />
u<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Exon</strong> amendment inserts into law a solution to the problem<br />
wl~ichhas been agreed to by state and local parties. <strong>The</strong> provision<br />
calls for construction of a storage lagoon separate from Dam Site #18<br />
where the effluent would be diverted and contained.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said “it makes no sense to have the Dam Site #18 project sit<br />
idle when this solution is available.” <strong>The</strong> change will not require<br />
any increase in the 1987 Energy and Water Appropriation. Previous<br />
funding and those available to the Corps of Engineers in 1987 should<br />
provide sufficient funds to complete the project.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Senate statutory provisions now go to a House-Senate<br />
conference for expected final approval.<br />
n<br />
-
5
●<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
—— .Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
3<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510 Telephone: 202-224-4224<br />
For F!elease, Ṣaturday, October 4, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATE APPROVES EXON WILDERNESS BILL<br />
———<br />
W , D S S wilderness<br />
designation bill (S.816) passed the Senate unanimously Friday<br />
night.<br />
<strong>The</strong> measure introduced by <strong>Exon</strong> which cleared the U.S. Senate<br />
was reported back to that body after its successful House<br />
c,~nsideration. <strong>The</strong> legislation designates more than 14,000<br />
acres of the Nebraska National Fo”rest as “wilderness~ and<br />
“recreation” areas.<br />
o<br />
F<br />
●<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislation designates the 6,600 acre, Pine Ridge<br />
location as a National Recreation Area and the 8,100 acre,<br />
Soldier Creek site a National Wilderness Area. Both sites are<br />
currently being managed as wilderness areas by the National<br />
S<br />
“ a w p<br />
g c s l<br />
R R c m<br />
p<br />
g S W A<br />
a<br />
r w c<br />
s g f i n<br />
would be controlled to prevent spreading to adjacent farm and<br />
ranch land. It also continues current cattle grazing<br />
practices. Hunting, fishing and trapping rights are protected<br />
for both areas.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> Pine Ridge Recreation Area will be managed in a manner<br />
similz~r to the Soldier Creek Wilderness area with the<br />
continuation of existing primitive and semi-primitive<br />
recre:~tional use,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill, which was cosponsored by Senator Zorinsky, now<br />
goes to the President who is expected to sign it into law.<br />
n<br />
- -<br />
r
Jim<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
For Rc!lease, Thursday, October 9, <strong>1986</strong><br />
.— EXON ODOMETER FRAUD LEGISLATION GOES TO PRESIDENT<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224.4224<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Another one of U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S (D-NEB)<br />
bills passed the Congress Wednesday night. <strong>The</strong> legislation (S.475) to<br />
crackdown on odometer fraud on used cars and trucks now goes to the<br />
Presiclent for his signature.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Senate gave final approval to the bill on Wednesday night.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Hc~useof Representatives passed the bill earlier in the week.<br />
●<br />
“E!ollingback odometers is one of the biggest frauds committed<br />
against consumers each year,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “Odometer fraud illegally<br />
adds an average of $750 to the cost of a used car that has been<br />
tamper’edwith,” he added. <strong>The</strong> National Highway Traffic Safety<br />
Administration estimates that odometer fraud costs consumers in excess<br />
of $2 billion annually.<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislation would strengthen present law by establishing a<br />
tracez~ble record of vehicle mileage readings. <strong>The</strong> mileage readings<br />
would be recorded on vehicle ownership titles at the time of a sale.<br />
In addition auto leasing companies which lease vehicles on long–term<br />
contrz,cts will be required to disclose the mileage when the vehicles<br />
are sc~ld. Auction companies will be required to maintain mileage<br />
records on the used vehicles they sell. It prohibits vehicles from<br />
being registered in any state unless the mileage can be verified.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill increases the maximum fine for odometer fraud from $1,000<br />
to $2,000 per violation and the criminal penalty from one to three<br />
years in prison.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said odometer fraud is a difficult crime to detect, but this<br />
legislation will establish steps to help identify odometer fraud. It<br />
is estimated that about three million odometers are tampered with each<br />
year; with odometers being rolled back an average of 30,000 miles per<br />
vehicle. Odometer fraud typically occurs on high mileage, late model<br />
used cars.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said the bill, suggested by the Nebraska New Car and Truck<br />
Dealers Association, will be a significant deterrent in preventing the<br />
interstate laundering of ownership titles and odometer tampering.<br />
Previously law enforcement officials have been handicapped by<br />
insufficient record keeping.<br />
● <strong>The</strong> ExOn bill was cosponsored by Senator Zorinsky and five other<br />
senators.<br />
~~’a~. \2b<br />
END
Nebraska<br />
0’Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-42M<br />
For Release, Friday, October 10, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON PROVIS —.. ION INCLUDED IN 1987 D A I ION BILL<br />
WASHINGTON , D .C . U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S (D-NEB) proposal<br />
to allow the National Guard and the Reserves to visit military<br />
commissaries a maximum of 14 times per year was approved by the<br />
joint Senate-House Conference on the 1987 Defense Authorization<br />
Bill in a late night session Thursday.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> introduced the legislation (S.2344) to allow the<br />
National Guard and Reserves to visit commissaries up to 14 times<br />
l e m r e<br />
p E l a<br />
S v D A<br />
p p m N<br />
R v a m c<br />
a s p a m<br />
a v C rules permit members of the National<br />
Guard and Reserves to visit the commissaries only during their<br />
da:{ tour of active duty training.<br />
‘!Fheexisting rule is not much of a benefit given that these<br />
individuals are often away from home,” <strong>Exon</strong> said. “In<br />
recognition of the growing importance of the Guard and’Reserves<br />
withi]~ the Total Force Concept, Reservists and the Guard members<br />
will have greater access to an important benefit,” he added.<br />
‘!Phischange in the commissary rules will lead to greater<br />
retention of trained and experienced personnel who are the most<br />
expensive to replace. More importantly, it makes the Total<br />
Force C an expression,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
E~:onpointed out in his successful argument to the<br />
Senat6>-House Conference Committee that under current national<br />
defense plans the National Guard and Reserve units would<br />
comprise about p m<br />
h<br />
o<br />
F e p r c<br />
f C p<br />
A<br />
o<br />
NR.86.127<br />
END
Nebraska<br />
●’ Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
For Re21ease, Saturday, October 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON l~ROTESTS TAX BENEFIT FOR TEXAS AND LOUISIANA<br />
I<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
UNIVERSITIES<br />
Wl\SHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON said he will offer an<br />
arrLendmen to eliminate a “grossly unfair” loophole in the Tax Reform<br />
Bill that benefits Texas University and Louisiana State University and<br />
penalizes the University of Nebraska and all other schools. <strong>The</strong><br />
loophole allows a special tax break for persons making charitable<br />
contributions to Texas University or Louisiana State University.<br />
a letter to Senator Bob Packwood (R-ORE), Chairman of the<br />
Senate Finance Committee, <strong>Exon</strong> protested the ‘grossly unfair provision<br />
of th(:Tax Reform Act” and said it “must be corrected.” <strong>The</strong> special<br />
loophole could be eliminated as part of the Tax Reform Technical<br />
Corrections bill which is pending before the Senate.<br />
●)<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said he will offer an amendment to an appropriate bill to<br />
make treatment equal for all schools unless the special loophole<br />
for Texas University and Louisiana State is either repealed or<br />
expan(ied to all schools.<br />
Contributors to either Texas University or Louisiana State<br />
Ur]ive.rsitycould receive some special benefit~ such as the right to<br />
purchase tickets to sporting events, in addition to receiving a full<br />
charitable tax deduction. No other schools in the nation could offer<br />
such Isenefits to contributors. Contributors to any other schools who<br />
receive any special benefit as a result of a contribution would not be<br />
able to take a charitable tax deduction.<br />
NR86.128<br />
(1’ETTER ON REVERSE SIDE)<br />
END
J. JAMES EXON<br />
N<br />
3 S H B<br />
W<br />
2<br />
A<br />
C<br />
C<br />
ARMEDS<br />
S<br />
T<br />
B<br />
2 F B<br />
L<br />
6<br />
S F B U<br />
O 1<br />
2 F BUtWING<br />
N P t<br />
WASHINGTON, DC 20510<br />
O<br />
I<br />
<strong>The</strong> Honorable Bob Packwood<br />
Chairman, Committee Finance<br />
United States Senate<br />
Washington, D. C. 20510<br />
Dear<br />
Bob:<br />
I writing about a g unfair provi.si,onof the Tax<br />
Reform Act of <strong>1986</strong> which must be corrected. I referring<br />
s 1608 of the bill, regarding the treatment of charitable<br />
contributions certain institutions of higher learning.<br />
As I u p s<br />
t p c<br />
s c U L<br />
S U A p c<br />
i<br />
w r a c d<br />
r s c r<br />
s r p s a<br />
s t i s b<br />
a o c u n<br />
grossly u<br />
\<br />
On behalf of the University of Nebraska and colleges and<br />
universities a nation, it is imperative that the Senate<br />
address this i technical corrections bill pending<br />
before the Senate o i the reconciliation conference.<br />
s break for universities must be repealed,<br />
provision should be expanded offer the treatment<br />
institutions of higher<br />
reconciliation bill<br />
learning. If this cannot<br />
technical corrections<br />
be done<br />
bill, I<br />
offer amendment accomplish this other appropriate<br />
vehicle.<br />
I f w c<br />
i r b<br />
a<br />
n<br />
S<br />
S
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
●Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
Telephone:202-224-42U<br />
FOK Release , Saturday, October 11, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON PROVIS ION HELPING SMALLER AIRPORTS<br />
IS APPROVED<br />
W , D S late F f<br />
unanimous approval to a provision offered by U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON to<br />
help s]naller airports locate r p l i<br />
p t p c<br />
<strong>The</strong> provision was included in the National Transportation Safety<br />
Board ,4uthorization Bill (HR4961). <strong>Exon</strong> is the ranking Democratic<br />
member of the Senate Aviation Subcommittee.<br />
<strong>The</strong> provision will c a n c p<br />
i i a i i<br />
a i p l c l<br />
●’<br />
‘This s d n s m<br />
a w s c<br />
e<br />
i m l<br />
i p c s a a<br />
<strong>The</strong> provision is a compromise from <strong>Exon</strong>’s original proposal which<br />
the Senate Commerce ~ommittee approved, but blocked by the House<br />
of Representatives. During discussions with the House, <strong>Exon</strong> fought<br />
for his o p w w r S<br />
T<br />
a g $50,000 to e r<br />
s a p i<br />
l i f would have come from the Aviation<br />
Trust l~und.<br />
v<br />
Th~~ExOn provision was endorsed by the American Association of<br />
Airport Executives, National League of Cities, National Association of<br />
Counties and numerous state and local governments.<br />
<strong>The</strong> compromise provision would require the Secretary of<br />
Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration to conduct a<br />
study I:oa effect the rapidly increasing i p<br />
h p a i r<br />
f s l<br />
Th6:National Transportation Safety Board Authorization Bill now<br />
goes back to the House of Representatives for final approval before<br />
being :;entto the president.<br />
0’ END<br />
nr86.12!9
J<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
I ‘F<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington,D.C. 20510 b<br />
r<br />
I<br />
. I Contact:MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Thursday, October 16, <strong>1986</strong><br />
SENATE OK’S COMMONWEALTH & PHYSICIANS MUTUAL TRANSITION RULES<br />
W S and ED ZORINSKY said<br />
the Technical Corrections to the Tax Reform Bill approved by the<br />
Senate Thursday includes transition rules for Commonwealth Savings<br />
depositors and the Physicians Mutual Insurance Company of Omaha and<br />
eliminates a special benefit for two southern university athletic<br />
programs.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Technical Corrections Bill gives Commonwealth depositors a<br />
second option to write-off their losses from the failed financial<br />
institution. <strong>The</strong> Technical Corrections Bill will permit depositors to<br />
take a one time deduction of up to $20,000 on their lost deposits<br />
without filing an itemized tax return. <strong>The</strong> Tax Reform Act permits<br />
depositors the other option which is to deduct a percentage of their<br />
loss each year on an itemized tax return over an extended period of<br />
● years.<br />
<strong>The</strong> two options will give large and small Commonwealth depositors<br />
the best possible choices in writing-off their losses. <strong>The</strong> one time<br />
$20,000 maximum deduction will benefit many smaller depositors who may<br />
not file itemized tax returns, while larger depositors will benefit by<br />
claiming their losses using the itemized tax return option.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill also eliminates a federal tax on Physicians Mutual<br />
Insurance Company of Omaha. Under current law, a subsidiary of<br />
Physicians Mutual has been subject to a federal tax that is not<br />
imposed on any other similar company. <strong>The</strong> technical corrections bill<br />
eliminates the tax and places Physicians Mutual on the same basis as<br />
its competitors.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill knocks out a special tax benefit for Texas University and<br />
Louisiana State University (LSU) that was included in the Tax Reform<br />
Bill. <strong>The</strong> special benefit exempted Texas University and LSU from an<br />
Internal Revenue Service ruling denying tax deductions for<br />
contributions to college athletic programs if a benefit such as<br />
football tickets are received as a condition for the contributions.<br />
No other universities in the nation would have been permitted to offer<br />
special benefits to contributors to their athletic programs.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> and Zorinsky said last week they would work to eliminate the<br />
loophole saying it was unfair to grant a special tax break only to<br />
these two universities’ athletic programs.<br />
Tk,emeasure now goes back to the House of Representatives before<br />
being sent to the President.<br />
nr86.130<br />
END
Nebraska<br />
U.S. senator<br />
●’ Jim <strong>Exon</strong><br />
,<strong>News</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For ReILease, Saturday, October 18, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— SENATE GIVES FINAL APPROVAL TO $65 MILLION FOR OGALLALA AQUIFER<br />
WASHINGTON, SENATORS JIM EXON ED ZORINSKY<br />
praised Senate final passage late Friday night of the Omnibus Water<br />
Resour
Nebraska<br />
“ J“imE;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Release, Wednesday, October 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />
.—. PRESIDENT SIGNS —— EXON WILDERNESS BILL ——<br />
W D.C. --- P R M s<br />
U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON’S wilderness designation bill for<br />
two important areas in western Nebraska,<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislation designates<br />
the 6,600 acre, pine Ridge<br />
location as a National Recreation Area and the 8,100 acre,<br />
Soldier Creek site a National Wilderness Area. Both sites are<br />
● managed<br />
locat(:d in the Nebraska National Forest and are currently being<br />
as wilderness areas by the National Forest Service.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> President’s approval ensures that these two beautiful<br />
areas will be protected for generations to come,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
Bc)thareas contain safeguards guaranteeing that fire,<br />
insect:sand noxious weeds w c p<br />
sprea6!ing to adjacent farm and ranch land. It also continues<br />
current cattle grazing practices. Hunting, fishing and trapping<br />
rights are protected<br />
for both areas.<br />
-<br />
nr86.132
Nebraska<br />
●’ Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 2~510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Re1ease, Wednesday, Octo’ber 22, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON PLEASED WITH POPULARITY OF GOLD COINS CREATED BY HIS BILL<br />
——— ——<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB), whose<br />
legislation created the first regular issue American gold coins in<br />
more than 50 years, said he is “tremendously pleased” with the<br />
domestic and international popularity the coins are having in their<br />
first week on sale.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> stressed that the coins will be an important factor in<br />
helping to decrease the U.S. trade deficit and reduce the national<br />
debt which have both hit record highs this year.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> emphasized that one very important aspect of the gold coin<br />
law is that profits from the sale of the American gold coins must be<br />
used to reduce the $2.3 trillion national debt. “This mandate<br />
specifically prevents gold coin profits from being used to further<br />
expand federal spending,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
“It is quite obvious from the overwhelming popularity shown in the<br />
first day that the public wants the option of investing in American<br />
gold coins,n <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> gold coins were offered for sale for the first time Monday and<br />
according to reports are being highly sought after. Mint<br />
officials indicated that first day sales were strong. <strong>The</strong> U.S. Mint<br />
sold in excess of 320,000 ounces of gold coins on the first day.<br />
In accordance with the <strong>Exon</strong> legislation, the gold coins are<br />
available in four different sizes. <strong>The</strong> sizes are a one ounce,<br />
on(=-half o one-quarter ounce and one-tenth ounce. <strong>The</strong> coins<br />
feature a family of American Eagles on one side and Miss Liberty on<br />
the other.<br />
NR86.133<br />
END
Nebraska<br />
●’ Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For ReLease, Wednesday, October 29, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— PRESID!ZNT SIGNS EXON ODOMETER FRAUD BILL<br />
LIINCOLN, NEBR. -- President Reagan has signed into law U.S.<br />
SENATOR JIM EXONIS (D-NEB) legislation (S.475) to crackdown on<br />
odometer fraud on used cars and trucks.<br />
This is the second bill this month that the President has signed<br />
into li~wwhich was sponsored by <strong>Exon</strong>. Last week the President signed<br />
into law <strong>Exon</strong>’s Nebraska Wilderness Designation Bill.<br />
<strong>The</strong> National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that<br />
odometer fraud costs consumers in excess of $2 billion annually.<br />
Odometf:r fraud illegally adds an average of $750 to the cost of a used<br />
car that has been tampered with.<br />
e<br />
Thf:legislation strengthens present law by establishing a<br />
traceable record of vehicle mileage readings. Previously law<br />
enforcc:ment officials have been handicapped by insufficient record<br />
keeping. <strong>The</strong> new law will take effect in 18 months.<br />
Unc~er the new law mileage readings will be required to be recorded<br />
on ownrship titles at the time a vehicle is sold. Auto auction<br />
houses will be required to maintain mileage records on the used<br />
vehiclf>s they sell. Vehicles will be prohibited from being registered<br />
in any state unless the mileage can be verified.<br />
Th~:bill increases the maximum fine for odometer fraud from $1,000<br />
to $2,000 per violation and the criminal penalty from one to three<br />
years in prison.<br />
Odometer fraud is a difficult crime to detect, but this law will<br />
establish steps to help law enforcement officials detect odometer<br />
fraud. It is-estimate~ that every year about three million used cars<br />
and trucks have their odometers rolled back an average of 30,000 miles<br />
per vehicle. Odometer fraud typically occurs on high mileage, late<br />
model used cars.<br />
o<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said this new law, originally suggested by the Nebraska New<br />
Car anclTruck Dealers Association, will significantly deter the<br />
interstate laundering of ownership titles and odometer tampering.<br />
n<br />
END
<strong>News</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
C M B<br />
T 2<br />
For Release Wednesday, November 12 <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— SENATE; HEARINGS ON AIRPORT TRUST FUND AND AIR SAFETY<br />
LINCOLN, NEBR. - <strong>The</strong> U.S. Senate Aviation Subcommittee,<br />
which Nebraska’s U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON is expected to become<br />
chairman of in January, will hold a field hearing at Chicago’s<br />
O’Hare International Airport on Thursday, November<br />
<strong>Exon</strong>, currently the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee,<br />
said t:hehearing will take testimony on the reauthorization of<br />
the A\’iation Trust Fund, collison avoidance and air traffic<br />
contrc~l systems. <strong>The</strong> trust fund, supported by taxes on airline<br />
passenger tickets, fuel and tires, is designed to provide funds<br />
to ensure safe and efficient air travel. In addition, the<br />
hearing will focus on air traffic control delays in larger<br />
airpor”ts, including Chicago O’Hare International Airport, which<br />
is one of the nation’s busiest airports.<br />
RcjnGreerr manager of Eppley Airfield in Omaha, is scheduled<br />
to testify at the hearing.<br />
-<br />
n
Nebraska<br />
a’Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R T N<br />
EXON [POV C<br />
L:[NCOLN, NEBR . -- Nebraska U.S. Senator JIM<br />
Senators Ernest Hollings (D-SC) and William Cohen<br />
EXON will join<br />
(R-Maine) in a<br />
trip to the People’s Republic of China and South Korea which is<br />
leaving this Saturday.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> is a member of the Armed Services Committee and the<br />
Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee. <strong>The</strong> trip’s<br />
schedule will focus on military and trade issues.<br />
●<br />
<strong>The</strong> group will depart November 15th and return to the United<br />
States November 29th. In South Korea, the first stop of the<br />
trip, the senators will meet with the President<br />
of South Korea<br />
and the Minister of Foreign Affairs. In China they will meet<br />
with :pense.<br />
-<br />
n
<strong>News</strong><br />
. Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Rel!-ease Țhursday, November 13, <strong>1986</strong><br />
—— EXON El~LISTSCONGRESS’ SUPPORT FOR GOODYEAR<br />
LIl~COLN, NEBR. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEB) contacted<br />
Attorney General Edwin Meese and the Securities and Exchange<br />
Commission regarding the potential hostile takeover of the Goodyear<br />
Tire and Rubber Company. He has also written to all other 434<br />
Members of Congress to enlist support in protecting the community and<br />
nat:ioniilinterests involved in the possible takeover.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong>, a member of the Senate Commerce Committee, met Wednesday<br />
with employee and management representatives of the Goodyear plant<br />
Lincoln.<br />
in<br />
●<br />
to<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> bitter hostile takeover attempt of the Goodyear Tire and<br />
Rubber Corporation by Sir James Goldsmith points to some serious gaps<br />
in the federal securities and antitrust law,” <strong>Exon</strong> said in a letter<br />
all Members of Congress. “While the federal securities law<br />
proteccs share-holders’ investments, it does not take into sufficient<br />
consideration worker or community investments,” he stressed.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> said he “fears this latest financial tug of war between<br />
Goldsmith and the Goodyear management will not only compromise the<br />
significant ‘investment that the Lincoln Goodyear workers have made<br />
in their company, but will also damage the entire corporation in a<br />
manner which will not serve any interest,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator urged Edwin Meese, U.S. Attorney General,<br />
whc)heads the Department of Justice to “carefully monitor this<br />
acquisition attempt and take whatever steps are necessary to insure<br />
that the national interest is protected.” In <strong>Exon</strong>’s letter to Meese,<br />
he said “because the Goodyear Corporation is a major employer, a key<br />
defense contractor, and high technology firm, there is an important<br />
national interest in the outcome of this struggle.”<br />
nr86.137<br />
--30--
, 1<br />
FcIrReleasef Friday, November 14, <strong>1986</strong><br />
EXON : REAGAN SPEECH HURTS U.S. CREDIBILITY<br />
.—<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
Wi4SHINGTON, D.C. -- “<strong>The</strong> President is in charge of foreign<br />
polic:~ and I do not believe he has done anything illegal. That does<br />
not make his actions right and these are certainly morally wrong,”<br />
said IJ.S.Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong>, a senior member of the Senate Armed<br />
Services Committee.<br />
“While he was sending arms to Iran he was simultaneously<br />
the American people and our allies that it was wrong.”<br />
telling<br />
he and the Israelis want to deal with Iranian terrorists, so<br />
be it, But to whimper that he was unfairly treated by the American<br />
press when the ‘leak’ obviously came from his clandestine Iranian<br />
connered him the 34th vote necessary to sustain his arms sales to<br />
Saudi Arabia.w<br />
I<br />
‘He told me that the Saudis needed the arms to protect their oil<br />
fields from Iran. Before and after that, he was secretly supplying<br />
arms to Iran that obviously could be used against the Saudis. <strong>The</strong><br />
Presic~ent seems to believe that his being the major weapons supplier<br />
to th~:world best assures peace.n<br />
●<br />
‘He and his secret Iranian friends say there was no deal or<br />
discussions of arms for hostages. If you believe them both, then what<br />
did the President get?n<br />
have so deteriorated in our foreign policy that we are<br />
trying to become co-conspirators with the Ayatollah Khomeini and his<br />
ilk, t:henwe are truly headed for disaster.”<br />
- -<br />
n
Nebraska<br />
0 Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
For Rc>lease, S N<br />
— C<br />
P<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D-NEBR), author of<br />
the law creating the new American gold coins, Friday urged the U.S.<br />
Mint to open additional production lines to meet the demand for the<br />
coins.<br />
Irla letter to Donna Pope, Director<br />
of the rJ.S.Mint, <strong>Exon</strong> said he<br />
has received numerous complaints about the lack of availability of the<br />
●<br />
“I urge you to consider, at least temporarily expanding production<br />
of the!coins ... It would be a shame to have a shortage situation<br />
coins and the Mint’s distribution<br />
system.<br />
during the holiday gift giving season,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator asked the Director of the Mint for a full<br />
report,on whether there is any evidence of ‘hoarding or excessive<br />
mark-up by the 25 designated primary distributors or their customers.”<br />
“I introduced the American Gold Bullion Coin Act to give the<br />
American people an alternative to investment in foreign gold, not to<br />
enrich large financial institutions,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
In addition, <strong>Exon</strong> requested U.S. Mint officials to investigate<br />
whether Japanese buyers have received preferential treatment in<br />
purchasing<br />
the smaller gold coins.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> popularity of these coins will continue only if the Mint acts<br />
● quickly to correct problems as they arise,” <strong>Exon</strong> said.<br />
n<br />
- -
Nebraska<br />
●’ Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
I<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
C M B<br />
T 2<br />
FOR RELEASE, Tuesday, November<br />
EXIONSUBMITS TESTIMONY ON GOODYEAR TAKEOVER BATTLE<br />
—.—-<br />
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. SENATOR JIM EXON (D–NEB) submitted<br />
testimony Tuesday to a special meeting of the House Judiciary<br />
Committee called to review the Goodyear takeover battle.<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> reiterated his opposition to Sir James Goldsmith’s<br />
hostile attempt to take control of the Goodyear Tire and Rubber<br />
Company. <strong>The</strong> Nebraska Democrat who has sought Congressional and<br />
Administration opposition to the Goldsmith move told the<br />
Co]nmittee that the acquisition was not in the nation’s best<br />
interest, nor the interests of the communities involved. <strong>The</strong><br />
Senator renewed his call for the Administration to “intervene to<br />
prsvent the unnecessary destructiveness on the acquisition<br />
attempt.”<br />
<strong>Exon</strong>, a senior Senate Armed Services Committee member,<br />
●’ pointed to the national security issues involved in the Goodyear<br />
takeover attempt. “<strong>The</strong> importance of Goodyear as a defense<br />
contractor cannot be underestimated and the dangers of it<br />
falling under foreign control cannot be mitigated by selective<br />
liquidation of assets” <strong>Exon</strong>’s statement said. “We should be as<br />
protective of this defensive resource in peace time as we would<br />
be during war time.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> Senator also questioned corporate America’s ability<br />
to compete in the international market place when it must<br />
“constantly fear the hungry carnivores on Wall Street”.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nebraska Senator’s statement said he will “continue to<br />
seek action from the Administration and will examine legislative<br />
avenues available to Congress.~<br />
n<br />
-<br />
Attachment
J<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R Monday, December 1 1<br />
‘ T p C<br />
C I T U O<br />
R<br />
O<br />
E S P I<br />
P C C H<br />
L U N 4<br />
T D 16TH. THE PRESENTATIOhJ WILL BE MADE IN<br />
SENATOR EXON’S LINCOLN OFFICE AT 2 F B 1<br />
C N T O<br />
P<br />
R<br />
b<br />
A<br />
C<br />
L N h f<br />
C 1 S<br />
a N A R<br />
d I P<br />
C u N<br />
<strong>The</strong> Index to the Papers of the Continental C<br />
1 i a i f v 67<br />
6 p gm<br />
the~st Important documents in our na~ion’s history, which<br />
are:located at the National Archives In Washington, D.C.<br />
v p a<br />
p p s d 5 d<br />
c C C d<br />
D Independence to the creation of the U.S.<br />
Constitution.<br />
n<br />
g w h s<br />
s i e h C<br />
i p N A R<br />
A<br />
N A<br />
o D I C<br />
R<br />
b<br />
d r h n<br />
d<br />
d<br />
i<br />
o<br />
n<br />
-
*<br />
?<br />
Nebraska<br />
●’ Jim E;on<br />
330 Hart Office Building<br />
Washington,D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R T D 1 1<br />
E J 1 S A N i O E N<br />
n<br />
W S ( a<br />
n 6 N y f a t t e p<br />
f s academies.<br />
n s S E S A<br />
S C c e p N<br />
s c i 1 a a<br />
r a u s o e2 n e f the U.S. n Air c<br />
* Force Academy and the U.S. Naval Academy. An unranked slate of 10<br />
nominees each were recommended for the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy<br />
and U.S. Military<br />
Academy.<br />
In.1 p v v<br />
F N A v<br />
M M M A<br />
F o a d s<br />
s a a a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
d s m<br />
p<br />
( E A P<br />
N S E N G A<br />
A L A A<br />
L S T L<br />
● C<br />
A<br />
A<br />
n<br />
r
1 .<br />
S E<br />
● I N 1 S A C<br />
F A V<br />
~ S A H<br />
~ k k<br />
S B H H<br />
(Cory Bremer Arlington High Arlington<br />
William Brooks Norfolk High (f8 N<br />
( o a d i cB<br />
M “ R H B<br />
I ( r w f c a to Pentagon)<br />
Douglas<br />
A<br />
A<br />
S<br />
S<br />
C<br />
C C<br />
I<br />
●’<br />
C<br />
J<br />
D<br />
S<br />
L<br />
A<br />
M<br />
C<br />
S<br />
S<br />
E<br />
S<br />
G<br />
G<br />
G<br />
K<br />
K<br />
K<br />
N<br />
P<br />
p<br />
P<br />
S<br />
S<br />
Z<br />
P<br />
A<br />
B<br />
M<br />
N<br />
L<br />
T<br />
L<br />
N<br />
O<br />
W<br />
M<br />
V<br />
S<br />
P<br />
N<br />
A<br />
L<br />
TL<br />
P<br />
a<br />
N<br />
= A<br />
B<br />
W B<br />
‘ H<br />
‘ J<br />
J J<br />
K<br />
N A V<br />
D L<br />
-( a<br />
L O C<br />
J M O W<br />
W M P<br />
‘ M L S<br />
M<br />
N<br />
O<br />
N<br />
P<br />
B<br />
P<br />
M<br />
R P Pius X<br />
T S C S<br />
T<br />
P<br />
C W C<br />
S A H<br />
t<br />
M S<br />
M H<br />
M<br />
M H<br />
M<br />
L H<br />
LHPK<br />
H H<br />
a<br />
P a p<br />
K C<br />
C P (<br />
r<br />
O<br />
OVER<br />
P<br />
L<br />
H<br />
N<br />
B<br />
SL<br />
P<br />
C<br />
P
.’<br />
S<br />
E<br />
N S A ●<br />
M A V<br />
N<br />
S A<br />
~ B ~ l<br />
Daniel Gammell<br />
Burke High<br />
Alicia Hargens<br />
Niobrara High<br />
Timothy Hoegemeyer Fremont High<br />
Kevin Kearns<br />
Millard North<br />
Todd Mason<br />
York High<br />
Susan Taylor<br />
Univ. of Nebr-Lincoln<br />
Rodd Thrower<br />
Bellevue East<br />
David Wells<br />
Elba High<br />
Maryann Ziegler<br />
Syracuse-Dunbar-Avoca Hi<br />
H<br />
=<br />
Omaha<br />
Niobrara<br />
Fremont<br />
Omaha<br />
York<br />
Omaha<br />
B<br />
C<br />
S<br />
H<br />
M M A V<br />
N S A<br />
J C ~<br />
~ u<br />
T D<br />
Republican Vailey<br />
I<br />
R G<br />
Roncalli High<br />
i<br />
J H<br />
Creighton Prep<br />
C H<br />
Blalr Highh e r<br />
L J Univ. of’Nebr-Lincoln a B<br />
S P<br />
Kearney High<br />
KTLL t o<br />
L P Tekamah-Herman<br />
r<br />
T R Lincoln High<br />
e<br />
C S Lfncoln Northeast<br />
k
Nebraska<br />
I<br />
e Jim E;on,<br />
Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R W D<br />
P I O C P U<br />
LINCOLN, NEBRASKA -- In honor of the forthcoming<br />
bicentennial of the Constl.tution i 1 U S J<br />
~ a f t N A a R r<br />
a<br />
A t d ad I t t P o mt<br />
i<br />
— C C t t U o o N o e n<br />
~,ateTuesday afternoon <strong>Exon</strong> presented the Index to Kent<br />
Hendrickson, Dean of Libraries at the University of<br />
Nebraska-Lincoln.<br />
I P C C<br />
1 i a i f v 67<br />
6 p gm<br />
t s<br />
. i d i o n h mn<br />
w o<br />
t l a t N A i W D o a a r<br />
v p a<br />
p p s d 5 d<br />
c C C d<br />
D I c<br />
C<br />
n<br />
g w h s<br />
s i e h C<br />
o<br />
i p N A R<br />
A<br />
N A<br />
o D I C<br />
R<br />
b<br />
d r h n<br />
d<br />
-<br />
n
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
0 J’im<strong>Exon</strong> NeWs<br />
Contact: MarkBowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R W D<br />
T P M A<br />
W . S ( j o<br />
in. u R A p s<br />
M A ( f b d<br />
~fi~edo not believe the PMAs should be divested frOm f<br />
o w s a l M<br />
D O M B (<br />
c i e r 6 t 3 p a t<br />
t l T l w s b 1 s i eU<br />
S E Z<br />
e o<br />
‘ P M A<br />
t c a d i e r<br />
s<br />
! t increases will<br />
● n w l a g i<br />
b s w<br />
I b r<br />
f g i r<br />
c<br />
c f<br />
c s f t r a g r<br />
I w t o<br />
P s w<br />
<strong>The</strong> senators also urged the Administration not to propose<br />
requiring the repayment on federal multi-purpose water projects<br />
~~ndera straight-line amortization schedule. <strong>The</strong>y said using a<br />
straight-line amortization would also raise the rates of’many<br />
consumers who are already In an economic struggle. <strong>The</strong> senators<br />
noted that ‘all PMAs are current in their repayment.?’<br />
- -<br />
d<br />
o<br />
n<br />
r
Nebraska<br />
0’ Jim E;o;<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R , M D<br />
M f C R A G<br />
W S Z<br />
i M a N a<br />
r $ i g<br />
F A A n s<br />
M A r $ e<br />
a r i a r l s<br />
C A r $ t p<br />
●’ r e -
●<br />
Jim<br />
Nebraska<br />
U.S. Senator<br />
<strong>Exon</strong><br />
Hart Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510<br />
<strong>News</strong><br />
. I Contact: Mark Bowen<br />
Telephone:202-224-4224<br />
R W D<br />
E D P T N<br />
W D E<br />
a S n N<br />
G s n s<br />
s t t N<br />
a f a r a<br />
l w A r a<br />
N G r s n<br />
n w m t t s<br />
l s c request.n<br />
<strong>Exon</strong> wrote to the DOE last August shortly after Nebraska<br />
Governor Bob Kerrey stopped a train transporting nuclear waste<br />
at the statefs southern border because the state had not been<br />
notified of the specific shipment. <strong>The</strong> train was carrying spent<br />
nuclear fuel from the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant in<br />
Pennsylvania.<br />
~Governors are responsible for public Safety and Protection<br />
for their states in the event of a mishap during transportation<br />
of a spent s w a f G I<br />
u h r<br />
s a s c e a<br />
c n p<br />
f p C C S<br />
r<br />
u b i a<br />
n c t w s<br />
p t d s<br />
e t s<br />
? a G s s a~<br />
m c a m e a G<br />
c r p s<br />
N<br />
s e p<br />
w<br />
-<br />
o<br />
n<br />
r
9 C A C<br />
—<br />
1310ckedMove of SCS T C<br />
O a c e S<br />
D A e L<br />
C S T C T e<br />
s L i<br />
r r s<br />
Senate Approval of Interstate Speed Limit Change<br />
In April 1956 <strong>Exon</strong> introduced legislation to allow the states to<br />
i s l i r S<br />
S a a f s<br />
r i s l a m<br />
C a b j H C<br />
f b r l<br />
i 1<br />
A D P A<br />
s S o a E<br />
: m a d p w<br />
\ f<br />
Congressional Approval of Airport Liability<br />
In the final days of the session the 99th Congress approved <strong>Exon</strong>ts<br />
Initiative to help prevent the potential closing of many small and<br />
rural airports facing enormous cost increases in liability<br />
:Lnsurance. Some rural a l i<br />
I p E p<br />
f a n c a c<br />
l i U President<br />
vetoed the measure which included <strong>Exon</strong>’s clearinghouse i.nitiati.ve.<br />
N P H R<br />
~Ixonwas instrumental in hammering out the final agreement of the<br />
Hydroelectric Relicensing Bill to ensure it protected Nebraskafs<br />
i f a e e r<br />
i e c r<br />
c<br />
d r p<br />
N G R B C<br />
C a E m permit National Guard and<br />
Fleserves to visit military commissaries ~ne day for each day of<br />
CLctiveduty, up to a maximum of 14 visits per year. v<br />
c o a d y c r<br />
e p e r<br />
C G R c<br />
c t a a<br />
o<br />
1<br />
o
C a S E<br />
l i i t<br />
a a S E l<br />
a<br />
C<br />
A A E<br />
h e s 1 c g<br />
c A g y F<br />
m n c p D<br />
c s b M e<br />
l m p<br />
r<br />
n<br />
N W A D<br />
i<br />
I o b 9~b p i R s E<br />
~ ~ N N<br />
F n w r a<br />
d p n 1 n<br />
f g e<br />
Odometer Fraud Signed into Law<br />
President Reagan also signed into law <strong>Exon</strong>?s legislation (S.475)<br />
to crack down on odometer fraud<br />
t<br />
p c d<br />
p a v w o m<br />
i t b s c ●<br />
c p o f e a t<br />
r vehicle mileage readings.<br />
Family Farm Credit Act<br />
In 1985 farm state Senator Jim <strong>Exon</strong> and others blocked all Senate<br />
business until the Senate Republican Leadership agreed to consider<br />
emergency legislation to aid family operated farms facing an<br />
economic depression in rural America. <strong>The</strong> efforts led to the<br />
Congressional approval of legislation to provide farm credit to<br />
family sized farmers. Unfortunately, President Reagan vetoed the<br />
measure.<br />
T P F D<br />
s f 1 d l<br />
freeze on commodity target–prices. <strong>The</strong> Administration ~roposed<br />
only a one-year freeze. <strong>Exon</strong>~s effort doubled the length of the<br />
freeze to two full years.<br />
Reorganization of Defense Department<br />
<strong>Exon</strong>, a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, was<br />
o m C d<br />
D D R<br />
r<br />
y<br />
r<br />
e<br />
m m c o e<br />
t t n d<br />
●<br />
-<br />
c
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
-....+-.— .-——-. .——.:.<br />
I<br />
Space Shuttle Must Continue<br />
Inani f A w<br />
c p t a S<br />
“ n s r<br />
e a l<br />
a a S S p<br />
s f b s r<br />
p o d e d<br />
e p N A<br />
S A ( t<br />
r o f R<br />
p l A s p<br />
c o a o d ap<br />
s p A f<br />
d d n a<br />
aq ac m s t s<br />
l u a p<br />
p A af n p<br />
g n a m s<br />
n s A a e<br />
n s f g b<br />
s s of our brave astronauts.<br />
a e s e<br />
n b s b c<br />
D r c a r d<br />
s l o e h<br />
p d al u c a<br />
r b p p<br />
l<br />
All America yearns to know the cause of the,explosion. It<br />
was a tragedywe all hoped would neveroccur, but subconsciously<br />
realized could happen. Congress will hold hearings on the accident,<br />
but it is NASA who will find the cause of the explosion.<br />
Yes, the space program willbe delayed whileNASA searches for<br />
answers, but the program will not stop. <strong>The</strong> investigativeteam<br />
willdevoteall the resourceswhichbuiltthe incrediblespaceshuttle<br />
toward findingthe cause. <strong>The</strong> investigationwilltake time and we<br />
should not expectquick answers. Rest assured if any one can find<br />
the cause of the explosion, it is NASA.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “Challenger” crew did not die in vain. <strong>The</strong> nation’s<br />
spaceprogram willbe safer due to the unfortunate accidentwhich<br />
befellthe “Challenger’s” outstanding crew. <strong>The</strong>y symbolizedour<br />
nation’s best and were among the bold willingto put their lives<br />
on the line and push technology to the limits.<br />
We have shared the victories of space as a nation and now<br />
we haveshared the sorrow. Our national commitmentto the space<br />
program should be strengthened. We feel the loss in our hearts<br />
and won’t forget the tragedy, but we willlearn from the accident<br />
and America will again advance in space exploration.<br />
I
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
●l<br />
c)<br />
Gramm-Rudmanand Agriculture<br />
Gramm-Rudman has been the law for just a short time and<br />
on March 1stit willbegin to take its toll on agriculture and rural<br />
America when $11.7 billion is expected to be cut from the current<br />
year federal budget.<br />
Some say agriculture won’t be harmed by Gramm-Rudman,<br />
but all the signspoint to deep cuts in farm programs important<br />
to Nebraska. Nearly everyday headlines appear specifying how<br />
Gramm-Rudman will cut programs from reducing commodity<br />
loan rates below their rock bottom levelsto cutting agriculture<br />
research at the University of Nebraska.<br />
Gramm-Rudman is not across-the-board deficit reduction as<br />
was touted in December. <strong>The</strong> Gramm-Rudman legislationwhich<br />
was attached to the President’s request to increase the debt ceilingto<br />
$2trillionexemptsmore than one-half of the federalbudget<br />
from cuts. That means the remaining one-half of the budget,<br />
whichincludesagriculture,must bear the burden $11.7<br />
billion in Gramm-Rudman automatic budget cuts.<br />
Agriculture programs comprise only about three percent of<br />
the total federal budget, yet under Gramm-Rudman it must bear<br />
over 11percent of the mandated cuts. No one objects, especially<br />
farmers, to taking a fair share of budget reductions to cut the<br />
budget deficit, but asking farmers to accept more than their share<br />
is wro,ng.Agricultural programs affect far more than just the nation’s<br />
two million farmers.<br />
I opposed Gramm-Rudman from the beginning because I<br />
recognized it would further damage the already depressed rural<br />
economy. I said then that a vote for Gramm-Rudman was a vote<br />
to cut agriculture and that premise has held true. Many in Congress<br />
who voted for it suggested the proposal would not harm<br />
agriculture. Now that reality has struck home, those who supported<br />
Gramm-Rudman are beginningto recognizethe dire consequences<br />
Gramm-Rudman brings to agriculture.<br />
Some of the same people who voted for Gramm-Rudman<br />
have suggestedthat the Congress should reopen the Farm Billto<br />
make improvements. Better it had been done right the first time.<br />
Reopening the Farm Bill might result in more reductions. I suspect<br />
the Administration would use such an opportunity to make<br />
further cuts in the farm program.<br />
No one denies the need to reduce the budget deficit. Working<br />
to reduce deficit spending has been one of my highest priorities.<br />
<strong>The</strong> nearly $200billion annual budget deficitsthe nation has<br />
experiencedduring the last fiveyears threatens our economic future.<br />
As a fiscalconservative,I support the BalancedBudgetConstitutional<br />
Amendment and have coauthored numerous budget<br />
proposals to freeze and reduce federal spending.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no doubt that the country needsto be put on a crash<br />
spending diet, but Gramm-Rudman is the wrong prescription.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are better, more responsible ways to reduce the deficit.
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
Time to Get Tough on Espionage<br />
In 1985more than a dozen spy cases were uncovered. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
security breaches brought to light the need to reviewthe punishments<br />
for espionage.<br />
Judging from the recent cases, today’s espionageappears to<br />
be motivated more by financial gain than by political ideology.<br />
Today’s spies are molded in the figure of Judas, willing to sell<br />
their knowledgeand compromise their country for a quick buck.<br />
We as a nation cannot tolerate spyingby privatecitizens,military<br />
personnel or civil servants. Espionage, done for an ally or<br />
potential adversary, is a crime that victimizesall Americans. Traitors<br />
are an affront to our Constitution and Bill of Rights.<br />
Espionage should carry one of the most severepenalties, but<br />
that has not always been the case. <strong>The</strong> Armed ServicesCommittee,<br />
on which I serve, has made changes to crackdown on military<br />
personnel convicted of espionage. Last year, for example,<br />
the provisionsof military law were changed to include the death<br />
penalty as an option of the military courts for espionage. Previously<br />
the maximum punishment under military law was life imprisonment.<br />
This military law was not tough enough. It was not<br />
even a true life sentence because it allowed for parole within ten<br />
years.<br />
We need to employ lie detector examinations on a selective<br />
basis to protect our national security secrets and better deter<br />
would-be traitors.<br />
It isestimatedthat over one-thirdof all Sovietdiplomatshave<br />
full-timeresponsibilityfor gathering information in the U.S. This<br />
isespeciallyworrisomegiventhe sizeof the Sovietdiplomaticmissions<br />
at the United Nations, in Washington, D.C. and San<br />
Francisco.<br />
<strong>The</strong> government can deter spyingwith a thorough reviewof<br />
security clearances, but that is only a start. <strong>The</strong> U.S. needs<br />
to fight fire with fire by improving our counterintelligencetechniques<br />
to combat spying.<br />
Congressshould not drag its feet in enacting tougher penalties,<br />
beefingup U.S. counterintelligenceand taking the profit out<br />
of spying. I am also cosponsoring legislationto prevent convicted<br />
spiesfrom reaping profits by writingbooks or sellingtheir stories.<br />
Each day we wait gives foreign agents and traitors another<br />
opportunity to steal security secrets and victimize America.<br />
Week of March 3, <strong>1986</strong>
.<br />
E<br />
J<br />
E<br />
D<br />
a)<br />
@<br />
National SecurityVersus<br />
the Unbalanced Checkbook<br />
<strong>The</strong> Presidentis seeking$320billion,approximatelyone-third<br />
of the total federal budget, for the Defense Department in 1987.<br />
This is an increase of eight percent real growth after last year’s<br />
decline.In funding our defenseneedsCongress,the President and<br />
the American public face both the very real Soviet commitment<br />
and the equally dangerous federal budget deficit.<br />
As a senior member of the Senate Armed ServicesCommittee<br />
and a participant in our securitydecisions,I keep severalbasic<br />
thoughts in mind. First, there would be no winners in a nuclear<br />
war, so preventionis obviouslya necessity.Second,giventhe massiveSovietmilitary<br />
buildup, the U.S. requires sufficient military<br />
power to discourageaggressors. Third, whilestrong and modern<br />
armed forcesare needed for deterrence,militarysuperiorityis not.<br />
Fourth, while the Soviets substantially outnumber the U.S. in<br />
some categoriesof weaponry, we excelin others and the U.S has<br />
advantagesin technology,geography, and the combined strength<br />
of our allies to better balance the Soviet arsenal.<br />
In the foreseeablefuture it is inevitablethat nuclear technol-<br />
ogy will be the core of our national security since it cannot be<br />
‘Cuninvented.” Accordingly, we must modernize our forces with<br />
efforts like the B-1 and Stealth bombers, cruise missiles,mobile<br />
Midgetman missile and the Trident missile submarine. On the<br />
other hand, the MX missilebasing plan is vulnerable to attack<br />
and places a “hair-trigger” on our nuclear forces. Research of<br />
the Strategic Defense Initiative is needed, but it is not the “ultimate”<br />
weapon or necessarilythe best answerto our defenseneeds.<br />
Similarly, our conventional weapons programs must be<br />
scrutinizedto avert purchasingdefectiveweaponsand avoid duplication.<br />
Fewpeoplerealizethat conventionalweaponscan be more<br />
costly to buy and maintain than nuclear ones. If negotiations allow<br />
lessrelianceupon nuclear forces, our defensespendingwould<br />
probably remain high, to counter the large Sovietsuppliesof conventional<br />
forces.<br />
All arms reductions efforts are just as important as modernizingweapons.Althoughgreat<br />
differencesremain betweenthe two<br />
superpowers, I am guardedly optimistic that some meaningful<br />
nuclear arms reductions can be achieved. As we strive to reduce<br />
the risks of nuclear war we must work carefully to ensure that<br />
conventional war does not become a more attractive alternative.<br />
<strong>The</strong> nation’s security willcontinue to require a high levelof<br />
spending. While the amount the nation can afford to spend on<br />
defensemust be balanced by the need to reducethe budgetdeficit,<br />
we must not forget that factors outside our borders aIsoinfluence<br />
defense requirements.<br />
Now more than evereverydefensedollar must be spent wisely.<br />
Congressionalefforts to curb waste in defense spending must<br />
continue. This is important to maximizeour limited defense dollars<br />
and retain public confidence to finance our national security.<br />
We must do our best to balance the nation’s priorities among<br />
defense, domestic programs, includingagriculture, and reducing<br />
the federal budget deficit.
●)<br />
a<br />
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
Lights, Camera,<br />
I Suggest the Absence of a Quorum!<br />
Live from the nation’s capitol, it’s the U.S. Senate! It won’t<br />
be that dramatic, but on June Ist the Senate will open its doors<br />
to live TV coverage. Radio coverage has already begun. <strong>The</strong><br />
proceedings will be available as a test until July 15th when the<br />
Senate will vote on whether to make the telecast permanent.<br />
Even though the House of Representativeshas been televised<br />
since 1979the Senate has not instituted TV coverage sooner because<br />
of concerns about how its rules and integrity might be affected.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Senate has very different rules than the House of<br />
Representatives.<strong>The</strong> 45 day test willallow the Senate to evaluate<br />
how televisionwillaffect the rules and determine if it willimpede<br />
or enhance the legislativeprocess.<br />
A major concern expressed has been how TV might affect<br />
the rules of filibuster and jeopardize the rights of the political<br />
minorities, such as the interests of the family farm. Unlike the<br />
House of Representatives, any member of the Senate may delay<br />
legislativebusiness with a filibuster.<br />
Others suspect that TV coverage may tempt senators to use<br />
the TV cameras as a platform to personally enhance their careers<br />
rather than address the issues. I’m hopeful senators will not let<br />
vanity stand in the way of business. Some fear that the Senate<br />
willbe bogged down by attempts to conduct committee business<br />
on the Senate floor simply so it could appear on TV.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Senate is known as the most deliberative body in the<br />
world so viewersshould not expectcoverageto challengethe networks<br />
for viewership ratings. TV coverage will change some of<br />
the preconceptions the public may have about the grandeur of<br />
the Senate.<br />
Viewersexpectingto see daily heated debate and a crowded<br />
room of senators willbe disappointed. <strong>The</strong> viewingaudiencedso<br />
should not assume that because they don’t see many senators in<br />
the chamber on TV that they are not working. <strong>The</strong> Senate chamber<br />
is usually very quiet, with only a few members in the chamber<br />
at any one time, exceptwhen votes are called. Senators spend<br />
most of their time working through a heavy scheduleof committee<br />
meetings where legislation is formed for floor action.<br />
Broadcasts of the Senate will improve America’s access to<br />
the actions of their elected officials, but there will be more to<br />
watching the Senate than just turning on the television. Viewers<br />
willneed to become familiar with Senate lingo and its sometimes<br />
complicated rules. Words like “cloture,” “quorum call,”<br />
“second-degree amendment” and others need to be understood<br />
to comprehend Senate actions.<br />
It is important to note that the Senate has always conducted<br />
its business in the open. More than 3,500 news reporters from<br />
across the country scrutinize every facet of the Senate and the<br />
Senators lives. Many Senate committee and subcommittee hearings<br />
are already telecast by C-SPAN, the group which televises<br />
the House of Representatives.<br />
Millionsof people depend on the electronic media for a significant<br />
portion of their news. Televisingthe Senate would seem<br />
the next step in the evolution of using modern technology to inform<br />
the public. <strong>The</strong> livetest is a worthy venture that I have supported.
E<br />
●’<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
●l<br />
D<br />
Reorganizingthe Defense Department<br />
to Meet Tomorrow’sNeeds<br />
Under legislation proposed by the Senate Armed Services<br />
Committee the Department of Denfense could see the first significant<br />
changes in its organization since Dwight D. Eisenhower<br />
was President.<br />
<strong>The</strong> need for change is clear. Even though the U.S. has the<br />
best equipped and trained armed forces ever fielded, weapons,<br />
warfare, and international relations have all become more complex.<br />
More than ever, it is necessaryto encourage strategic planning<br />
and streamline defense decision making.<br />
<strong>The</strong> reviewof the Pentagon began more than a year ago when<br />
I participated in a Georgetown University study which identified<br />
the need for organizational changes. Many of that study’s findingswerealsoreachedby<br />
the Armed ServicesCommittee,of which<br />
I am a senior member, and were used as the basis for the legislation.<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislationaddressesseveralseriousproblems within the<br />
existingDefenseDepartment hierarchy. Some of the problemsinclude:<br />
an overemphasis on the day-to-day management of the<br />
DefenseDepartment with too little attention to strategyand planning<br />
operations; an unhealthy competition between the armed<br />
services;and a lack of “joint” perspective by the services. Just<br />
as worrisome are the bloated and duplicative staffs.<br />
In today’s complex world of high tech weapons and rapidly<br />
changing political situations, the need for a “joint” perspective<br />
of strategicplanning and cooperation among all the militaryservicesis<br />
greater than ever. <strong>The</strong> individualarmed servicesmust think<br />
more as a team and lay aside parochial self-interests. Competition<br />
between the servicesis fine when the Army and Navy football<br />
teams play, but not when it comes to defending America.<br />
<strong>The</strong> legislationwould give more authority to the Chairman<br />
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and place greater emphasis on the<br />
needs of the field combat commanders. <strong>The</strong> bill would eliminate<br />
duplicationby the large military and civilianstaffs in the Defense<br />
Department. For theseorganizationalchangesto be effectivethey<br />
must be accompanied by a change of attitude by each service.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Armed ServicesCommittee also indicatedthat Congress<br />
can aid in this reorganizationby not micromanagingeveryproject<br />
at the Pentagon. More and more in recentyearsCongresshas tried<br />
to participate in managing defense projects through the budget<br />
process. For example, in 1985Congressional Committees made<br />
1,848changes in the defense budget. Congress has the responsibility<br />
to review the Defense Department actions, but this many<br />
changessignalthat Congressmay have gotten too involvedin the<br />
day-to-day operations of projects. This much involvementtends<br />
to add to the bureaucracy which should be streamlined.<br />
Rapidly changing technology and international situations<br />
mandate that our high tech defense system is not made obsolete<br />
by an outdated decision making process. <strong>The</strong> amount of money<br />
spenton defenseis meaninglessunlesswe modernizethe organizational<br />
hierarchy of the Defense Department to meet the times.<br />
Week of March 24, <strong>1986</strong>
●’<br />
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
Rural Lenders and Borrowers<br />
Get Some Relief<br />
After more than a year of meetings, letters, and Congressionalhearings,<br />
we have been successfulin pressuring the federal<br />
bank regulators to make some of the changes needed to help<br />
reduce the rising number of rural bank closingsand farm foreclosures.<br />
Federal regulators recently indicated they willease accounting<br />
rules on rural banks who have been hurt by the depressed<br />
agriculturaleconomy.<strong>The</strong> changes,whichshouldhave been made<br />
last year, couldpreventmore rural banks, farms and ranchesfrom<br />
being put on the auction block. We now must monitor their actions<br />
to make sure they match their words. I am also supporting<br />
an effort to make these bank regulation changes permanent law.<br />
Agricultural lenders continue to face serious problems because<br />
of high interest rates, an overvalued dollar, low farm income<br />
and decliningland values. Rural banks have been closing<br />
at an increasingrate. <strong>The</strong>seclosingshave forced hundredsof farmers<br />
and ranchersto deal with the FDIC on their outstandingloans.<br />
All too often this has led to many unnecessary farm and ranch<br />
foreclosures.Some agricultural bankers face the difficult options<br />
of foreclosing,riskingthe bank’s own liquidation or being forced<br />
into a merger by bank regulators. <strong>The</strong>re are other choices.<br />
In a recent report, the FDIC finally acknowledged the seriousness<br />
of farm bank problems in rural America previously ig-<br />
a<br />
nored. <strong>The</strong> report outlines the advantages of both a Net Worth<br />
and loss deferral programs as two measures to aid rural banks.<br />
Last year I proposed extending the Net Worth program, which<br />
is already law for home lending institutions, so the FDIC could<br />
aid similarlydistressedrural lenders. Similarly, a loan lossdeferral<br />
program would help rural areas by permitting farm banks to<br />
write-off their agricultural loan lossesover a number of years instead<br />
of limiting it to one year.<br />
<strong>The</strong> FDIC report correctly concludes, as I have suggested,<br />
that “a carefully constructed program that enables farm banks<br />
to defer or be reimbursed for some portion of their lossescould<br />
help reduce the number of bank failures and limit further disruptions<br />
to farm communities.”<br />
Decliningland values are a source of many rural economic<br />
problems. In Nebraska, farm land values have dropped as much<br />
as 50070since 1981.Establishinga secondarymarket for farm real<br />
estate and permitting banks to hold agricultural land for a longer<br />
period of time are two options being considered by the Congress<br />
to ease the pressure on rural America. It may also be preferable<br />
for banksto leaseland whichhas been foreclosedback to the operator,<br />
rather than sellingit out from underneath a temporarilytroubled<br />
borrower.<br />
Closing a small town’s only bank seriouslyaffects the com-<br />
‘. munity’s economic viability. Federal bank regulators need to<br />
recognizethat a troubled rural bank isjust as serious as an ailing<br />
multi-national bank. In my opinion, federal regulators have not<br />
o)<br />
givensmall farm lenders and their borrowers the same consideration<br />
givento largebanks like,ContinentalIllinoisNational Bank,<br />
which are supposedly “too large to fail.’ FDIC a<br />
b b C I a<br />
c a “ s e<br />
l
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
AgricultureFares Well<br />
1987 Budget CommitteeProposal<br />
For the first time in a number of years the Senate Budget<br />
Committeeworked in a uniquebipartisan manner and sentits 1987<br />
budget proposal to the full Senate. This budget is very fair to<br />
agriculture. <strong>The</strong> Committee rejected the Administration’s plans<br />
to severelycut rural programs.<br />
As a fiscal conservative, I have always advocated the need<br />
to balance the federal budget. Like families and businessesthe<br />
federal government must balance its accounts or risk the consequencesof<br />
financial ruin. <strong>The</strong> federal government, however, has<br />
violated this basic economic rule for a number of years. It has<br />
continually spent more than it received in tax revenue.<br />
Since1981,the national debt -- the accumulationof the yearly<br />
budget deficits -- has more than doubled to $2 trillion. Annual<br />
deficits of $200 billion have become commonplace since the<br />
“supply side” economic revolution of the last five years. This<br />
record r b f s b<br />
g n f l<br />
g<br />
● ) S B C w h<br />
a p b b b e<br />
r d w m s a<br />
t f f r C b<br />
a i P b p<br />
r d b b<br />
C b p a s<br />
r ab f f p<br />
r o I p ab f a<br />
an y C s r<br />
r m i t c<br />
l am c g i<br />
n f C r a<br />
P r b r<br />
t o s r E p<br />
C a r p<br />
R E A R T A<br />
a e p A<br />
p s r p<br />
C b b b<br />
d l p G<br />
S B C c G<br />
d t P b m<br />
b P b p a<br />
C B O w r in a $160billiondeficit.<br />
This would exceedthe Gramm-Rudman deficit levelsand trigger<br />
●l<br />
more automatic budget cuts. A second Gramm-Rudman budget<br />
cut would seriously harm agricultural programs.<br />
I am hopeful that the bipartisan spirit of the Senate Budget<br />
Committeewhichproduced this agreement, willcarry this budget<br />
through the Congress. <strong>The</strong> Senate Budget Committee bipartisan<br />
proposal represents a giant step toward fiscal discipline.<br />
Apri] 21, <strong>1986</strong>
●’<br />
o)<br />
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
Drawing the Line on Terrorism<br />
<strong>The</strong> United States has drawn the line against Libyan-backed<br />
terrorism. Libya has been a sanctuary for terrorists to plan attacks,<br />
but the recent American bombing raid on Libyan terrorist<br />
training areas has made Colonel Khadhafy fully aware that the<br />
United States willrespond to terrorist aggressions.America will<br />
not sit quietly while innocent people die in unprovoked terrorist<br />
attacks.<br />
Terrorism is an ever-present danger in today’s world which<br />
is difficult to counter becauseit is usuallyindiscriminateand unpredictable.<br />
Too many Americans have suffered and been killed<br />
as a resultof terrorist acts. America must take all possibleprecautions<br />
against terrorism and strike back whenever necessary. <strong>The</strong><br />
interceptionand capture of the hijackersof the cruiseship Achille<br />
Lauro illustratedwhat our intelligenceand armed forcesare capable<br />
of accomplishingwhen the occasion presents itself. Given the<br />
evidenceof past Libyan involvementin terrorism, the President<br />
had no choice but to order the air strike against Libya on April<br />
14th.<br />
Closecooperation with other governmentsis essentialto effectivelycombat<br />
terrorism. On numerous occasions, the United<br />
States has worked with other governments and successfully<br />
preventedterrorist acts. <strong>The</strong>se ties must be strengthened. Nations<br />
mustwork togetherto form an internationalagreementthat would<br />
defineinternationalterrorism,denypoliticalsanctuaryto terrorists<br />
anywhere in the world, and impose economic sanctions against<br />
nations supporting terrorism.<br />
Other defensivemeasures must also be taken to prevent terrorist<br />
acts. Airport and airline security must be improved. Congress<br />
has approved more airport security inspections and an<br />
expansionof the “Sky Marshal” program. Stepshave been taken<br />
to improvethe securityof buildingsand installationsoperated by<br />
the United States overseas. Our government officials and service<br />
personnel are receivingcounter-terrorism training. Nonetheless,<br />
the recent bombing of a TWA jetliner and several terrorist acts<br />
against U.S. servicemenand their dependents in Europe reveal<br />
that still stronger security measures are needed.<br />
With the exception of Great Britain, I was disappointed at<br />
the attitude of our European allies to the bombing of Libyan<br />
bases. Even though European nations have been the repeated victimsof<br />
terrorism,they havenot acted decisivelyagainststate sponsoredterrorism.Untilrecently,mostEuropean<br />
allieshavenot even<br />
supported economicsanctionsor diplomaticactions. Instead they<br />
tried to avoid the reality of the attacks and distanced themselves<br />
from the problem. <strong>The</strong>n, ironically, they complain that Americans<br />
are not vacationing in Europe.<br />
<strong>The</strong> recent diplomatic actions taken by the European Community<br />
to limit the travel rights and number of Libyan officials<br />
are a step in the right direction, but still far short of what is<br />
needed.Terrorismthreatensthe peopleof all nationsand the sooner<br />
all nations join in the effort to fight it, the sooner it will be<br />
defeated.
.)<br />
Interstatesare among the safestroads in America. <strong>The</strong>y were<br />
built for safe travel at speedshigherthan 55 mph. <strong>The</strong>re is a myth<br />
that the publicobeysthe 55mph law and that it isbeingenforced.<br />
In reality the statistics tell a story of wholesale violations.<br />
Givingstatesthe option to increasethe INTERSTATE speed<br />
limit to 70 mph, or even 65 mph if that is acceptable, without<br />
losingfederalhighwayfunds, as I propose, makes sensewhen you<br />
look at the statistics. <strong>The</strong> 55 mph law would be RETAINED on<br />
all other roads, which is where the most traffic fatalities occur.<br />
Interstate travelers know traffic goes faster than the ignored<br />
55 mph limit. <strong>The</strong> U.S. Department of Transportation statistics<br />
show that the speed at which most traffic moves on rural interstate<br />
is 64 mph in Nebraska and is 66 mph nationally. It is obvious<br />
from the figures that on Nebraska’s rural interstate the<br />
legislation would in reality only raise the speed limit five miles<br />
per hour above what motorists are actually driving. If we compromise<br />
on 65 mph for rural interstates, we would be exactly at<br />
the speed most people travel and they could do it legally.<br />
In 1985,only 3,918 tickets were issued to motorists traveling<br />
between 56 mph and 65 mph on Nebraska’s interstate, while<br />
27,364ticketswereissuedto motoristsexceeding65 mph. According<br />
to the Department of Transportation, an astounding 86 percent<br />
of the traffic on Nebraska’s rural interstate exceedsthe 55<br />
mph law. Much of this leniencycan be attributed to Nebraska’s<br />
minimal$10 fine and no lossof driving points if caught speeding<br />
less than 65 mph on the interstate.<br />
Critics of givingthe states the option to raise the interstate<br />
speedhavecitedmisleadingfatality figures.<strong>The</strong>y refer to the number<br />
of fatalities on all Nebraska roads, while the bill deals ~<br />
with interstates. —<br />
Safety officials attribute too many deaths to speed. In 1985<br />
less than five percent of Nebraska traffic fatalities occurred on<br />
interstates and speed was not listed as a factor in ANY of them.<br />
More than 90 percent of fatalities nationwide occur on roads<br />
which would retain the 55 mph law.<br />
Skepticsincorrectly assume that if the interstate speed were<br />
raised to as much as 70 mph motorists would drive 75 mph or<br />
more. This is wrong since the minimal penalty would no longer<br />
exist as an incentiveto break the law. Strict enforcement of the<br />
70 mph limit on interstates and 55 mph law on other roads, accompanied<br />
by expensivefines, would discourage speedingon all<br />
roads. People drive at the enforced speed limits, not just those<br />
posted.<br />
Finallythe 55 mph law was enacted in response to an energy<br />
crisis. No one has forgotten the oil shortages, but today we have<br />
an entirelydifferent situation. If we encounter another energycri-<br />
sis, we may have to reduce limitsagain. Now, autos are more fuel<br />
efficient and fuel prices are stable. Also we must recognizethat<br />
the interstate system is less than seven percent of all highways.<br />
With these facts in mind, increasingthe interstate limitwould not<br />
significantlyaffect consumption or safety.<br />
e<br />
E<br />
J<br />
U<br />
E<br />
S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
States Should Have the Option to<br />
Increasethe InterstateSpeed Limit<br />
Week of May 19, <strong>1986</strong>
●)<br />
o<br />
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
<strong>The</strong> Tax Reform Rocket<br />
Tax reform is taking off like a rocket herein the Senate. <strong>The</strong><br />
Senate Finance Committee, in sending the tax reform bill to the<br />
Senate floor with a unanimous vote, has taken the first bold step<br />
to modernize the tax system in 30 years.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bill contains significantreductions in tax rates for both<br />
individuals and businesses. It simplifies the individual tax rate<br />
structure by reducing from 14 to 2 the number of tax brackets.<br />
<strong>The</strong> two new brackets for individuals would be 15Y0and 27V0,<br />
nearlycuttingin one-halfthe current top tax bracket of 50070.<strong>The</strong><br />
top corporate tax rate would be reduced from 46V0to 330/0.<br />
<strong>The</strong> measure eliminatesmost of the unfair tax shelters used<br />
by nonfarmer-ranchers to unfairly compete against our family<br />
farm interests. This will discourage most nonfarmers from entering<br />
agricultureto operate it as a loss simplyso they can escape<br />
paying taxes on other income.<br />
<strong>The</strong> tax reform packageincludesa minimumtax on largecorporations<br />
which have been escaping their federal tax liabilities.<br />
This is a major step toward tax equity which I have advocated<br />
for many years.<br />
One area whichhopefullycan be further reviewedby the full<br />
Senateis the total eliminationof deductibilityof IndividualRetirement<br />
Account (IRA) contributions. We are reviewingoptions to<br />
at leastpartirdlyrestorethe deductibilityof IW. IRAswerecreated<br />
in 1981to stimulate individualsto better plan for their retirement.<br />
IRAs were also viewed as an incentiveto increase savings<br />
in the United States and to improve capital formation. Among<br />
industrialized nations we are the worst “savers.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> Senate tax reform bill includes some provisions which<br />
would particularly benefit farmers. <strong>The</strong> Senate bill would permit<br />
farmers to deduct up to one-half the cost of their health insurance<br />
premiums. We are asking farmers, ranchers and small business<br />
owners to advise us of any concerns they find with the bill<br />
as all review its details.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Senate tax reform bill is vastly superior to the version<br />
approved by the House of Representativeslast fall. I am confident<br />
that the Senate bill will serveas the framework upon which<br />
the final tax reform bill will be approved by Congress.<br />
A consensus has developed that the Senate tax reform<br />
proposal appears, on the whole, to be a good bill with many advantages.Despitesomeof<br />
the drawbacksto the billI am enthusiastic<br />
about the opportunity to improveour current complicatedand<br />
confusing tax system.<br />
A struggleis beginning to emerge as to whether tax reform<br />
should proceed ahead of the 1987budget bill. With the staggering<br />
deficitproblem and the Gramm-Rudman law of blind acrossthe-board<br />
cuts threatening programs, it seemsobviousto me that<br />
the budget should be the first priority followed immediately by<br />
tax reform. Yet, the Senate Republican leadership, who schedules<br />
action, has failed to abide by the Gramm-Rudman requirement<br />
that the federal budget be finished by April 15th.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no reason not to put both of these important measures<br />
on a fast track. <strong>The</strong> taxpayers are ready for the Senate to<br />
act. <strong>The</strong> country is waiting. Let’s not delay.<br />
For Week of June 2, <strong>1986</strong>
●)<br />
@<br />
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
GrainQualityImportantto IncreasingExports<br />
<strong>The</strong> export grain market isveryimportant to American farmers.<br />
With the growing competitivenessbetween nations on the<br />
world grain market, it is vital that the United States grain be of<br />
superior quality.<br />
We have all heard the horror stories about U.S. grains being<br />
criticizedby customers for being of inadequate quality. During<br />
the past fiveyears, agriculturalexportshavedecreased28qo,from<br />
$41billionin 1980to $29billionin 1985.<strong>The</strong> criticalstoriesabout<br />
lowqualitystandards has been a factor contributingto the decline<br />
of U.S. grain exports.<br />
Adding nongrain materials to export grains hurts the reputation<br />
of the American farmer and American exporter. It only<br />
takes one bad shipment of poor quality grain for a foreign customer<br />
to decide the low quality is not worth the price and go to<br />
one of our competitors, like Canada, Argentina, or in Europe.<br />
I am supporting legislationwhich would improve the quality<br />
of grain exportedby imposingnew, stricterstandards. <strong>The</strong> legislation<br />
would prevent an export elevator from adding nongrain<br />
materials to grain designated for export. In addition, I am supporting<br />
trade legislationthat would provide payment-in-kind incentives<br />
for improved export grain quality.<br />
Exported grain quality simply must be improved. <strong>The</strong> U.S.<br />
has enough difficulty fightingthe tariffs and trade barriers being<br />
erected against U.S. exports without having to deal with a poor<br />
quality product being delivered.<br />
U.S. farmers are being undercut in the world market by foreign<br />
farmers who are heavilysubsidizedby their nation’s treasuries.<br />
U.S. farmers produce the highest quality of farm goods at<br />
the most efficient rate. Without a doubt this high quality should<br />
be passed along to our foreign customers. A high quality product<br />
will ensure repeat customers and increased agricultural exports.<br />
<strong>The</strong> end result willbe better market prices, a stronger agricultural<br />
economy and higher farm incomes.<br />
It is in the best interest of our agricultural sector to make<br />
grain quality standards tougher. It willdemonstrate to customers<br />
on the world market that the United States farmer and hisgovernment<br />
are committed to providing the highest quality grain available.<br />
It could also erase a perception caused by previous<br />
agricultural embargoes that the United States is not a reliable<br />
supplier.<br />
<strong>The</strong> United States must be aggressive in recapturing<br />
customerson the world agricultural markets. To recapture those<br />
customers, our nation, just as any businesswould, must offer the<br />
best product available on the world market. Our farmers can<br />
produce the best product and federal law should ensure that the<br />
best product is delivered.<br />
Week of June 16, <strong>1986</strong>
. . —-. ...— . . .-..—.<br />
1<br />
E<br />
D<br />
J E<br />
U S S I<br />
F N<br />
Yes to Wheat ReferendumPoll<br />
Oncea the Administration is sidingwith bakers, millers<br />
and exporterson an important matter facingAmerica’sstruggling<br />
food producers. This affront is directed at the upcoming wheat<br />
produc:erpoll, and the Administration is supporting lower wheat<br />
prices.<br />
In the past severalweeksfarmershavebeendelugedwithprice<br />
and set-asideestimates that could result from a mandatory program.<br />
,4s expected,the Department of Agriculturehas publicized<br />
projectionswhichvery convenientlysupport the Administration’s<br />
position. We need only cite the Department’s mishandling and<br />
faulty projections of the impact of the Dairy Termination Program<br />
to realizethat their numbers are suspect and the real question<br />
is the direction we should take in agricultural policy.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Reagan Administration would have us believethat increased<br />
exports will be the salvation of American agriculture.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no basis in fact for this. Indeed, during the nearly six,<br />
years of its policieswe have witnessedone of the steepestcrashes<br />
in producerpricesin history. Savea sustainedworld-widedrought<br />
or someother unexpecteddisaster,there is littlechancefor a price 1<br />
turn-around. Do we wager what is left of family farm solvency<br />
on a long shot chance of a world-wide disaster? I strongly urge<br />
againsl.such a policy or folly as I view it.<br />
Even if .4dministration farm policiesdo result in increased<br />
exportf;,improvementsin domesticfarm incomedo not seemlike-,<br />
Iy. One anal!{sisof the 1985Farm Bill (conducted with the help ~••‹ðž–•ˆ••Œ,mz•<br />
of two highlyregardedMidwesternland grant universities)predicts<br />
that farm income willdeclinefrom $26.6billion in 1985to $21.8I<br />
billion in 1989.That amounts to an 18percent reduction. An 18~<br />
percentreductionin income,evenfor those farmers not now nearing<br />
bankruptcy, would be devastating. It would be the “swan 1<br />
song” for much of rural America, tearing away at the basic fiber<br />
of society in greater Nebraska.<br />
In addition to domestic farm prices, farmers must consider t<br />
world-wideagriculturalproduction possibilities.<strong>The</strong> world is now<br />
produ(:ingmore food than ever thought possible. Biologicaland<br />
techni(:aladvances have put agriculture at the brink of an un-,<br />
precedented production explosion. Any country with an ounce<br />
of common sense will grab the opportunity to become selfsufficient<br />
in food<br />
as the United States accomplished<br />
in its beginnings.<br />
Somestartlingexamplesof this increasedagriculturalproduction<br />
are evident. China has been able to increase wheat production<br />
by more than 300 percent since 1960with very little change<br />
in wheat acreage.China currentlyusesabout 11percentof its land<br />
for agriculture. What will happen when they expand their available<br />
areas?<br />
China is not alone. From 1960to 1985,Bangladeshincreased<br />
wheatproductivityby 4,797percent, starting at 29,000metrictons<br />
in 1960and ending in 1985with 1.4 million metric tons.<br />
India has achieved successin wheat production, largely by<br />
expanding the area harvested. From 1960to 1985India’s wheat<br />
production rose by 329 percent, and since 1980rose another 39<br />
percent.<br />
A significantlynew trend in world food production has been<br />
established. If policy makers and American farmers ignore that<br />
trend, the result willbe continued depressionand uncertainty for<br />
our producers.<br />
In addition to considering foreign production capabilities,<br />
American farmers should bear in mind the cost of current farm<br />
programs. <strong>The</strong> current program willcost the governmentbillions<br />
of dollars over the next several years. In this era of staggering<br />
federal expenditures, the future of expensiveprograms, no matter<br />
how well-intendedand necessary,is precariousat best. Bycontrast,<br />
controversial as a mandatory program might be, it will<br />
greatly reduce federal-expenditures and begin to inject muchneeded<br />
income into a depressed rural America. It will bring<br />
profitablesupplyinto balancewith reasonabledemand. <strong>The</strong> sooner<br />
we realize we cannot “produce” our way out of this agricultural<br />
dilemma, the better.<br />
<strong>The</strong> vote that farmers cast in this poll will be one of their<br />
most important. It willsend a clear message,one way or another,<br />
as to how satisfiedAmerica’swheat farmers are with current farm<br />
policies.I urge them to send a messageto the President and Congressthat<br />
current pricesare not acceptableand that they are willing<br />
to do their part in reducing government subsidies and<br />
improving farm t)rices.<br />
June 30, <strong>1986</strong>
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
National Guard & ReservesRole in Defense<br />
<strong>The</strong> largest portion of our nation’s defense budget goes<br />
toward the pay and benefits of the men and women who serve<br />
in the armed forces and endure the riggers of military life.<br />
Recognizingthis fact, Congresshas embracedthe Total Force<br />
Conceptprogram whichincreasesrelianceupon the part-time soldiers,<br />
sailors,and airmen of the National Guard and the Reserves.<br />
Sincethe Guard and Reservesservein uniform only one weekend<br />
per month and two weeks annual active duty, and do not fully<br />
qualifyfor militaryhealth care and governmenthousing,they cost<br />
much Iess to operate than active duty personnel.<br />
Another factor encouraginggreater relianceupon the Guard<br />
and Reservesis that the membersof theseunitsare talented, motivated<br />
personnelwho often have servedmany years of activeduty<br />
experience.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Total Force Concept integrates the Guard and Reserves<br />
closer than ever into our nation’s overall military strategy. In a<br />
time of crisis,Guard and Reserveunitswould mobilizeand deploy<br />
overseas either before or with their active duty counterparts.<br />
<strong>The</strong> goal of the Total Force Concept is to make the Guard<br />
and Reservesas prepared as the active armed forces. Right now<br />
the Guard and Reservecomprise 35070of the Army combat divisions,<br />
86Y0of the Navy’sminesweepers,nearly 70070of the fighter<br />
planes protecting the United States, and one-third of all the<br />
Air Force’s fighter planes.<br />
With this greater reliance on the Guard and Reserves, the<br />
days of the “weekend warrior” are gone. What was once two<br />
weeks annual training is now frequently three weeks. Instead of<br />
two days per month, additional eveningsare frequently needed<br />
to achieve the required levels of readiness.<br />
Despiteitssuccess,somequestionsremain regardingthe Total<br />
Force Concept. First, although Guard and Reserveunits are less<br />
expensive,the cost is still high in order to make them as ready<br />
as active military units. Higher readiness can only be achieved<br />
by providing the Guard and Reserveswith greater support services<br />
from the active duty services.<br />
Another major difficulty arises in purchasing the quantities<br />
of needed modern equipment. Despite the modernization of<br />
weapons,many Guard and Reserveunitshaveobsoleteequipment,<br />
such as agingaircraft and Korean War-vintageanti-aircraft guns.<br />
<strong>The</strong> readiness of military units also depends on the number<br />
of personnel assigned and the amount and quality of training.<br />
Here again,the Guard and Reservesface seriouschallenges.Training<br />
one weekenda month and two weeksa year is not much time<br />
to developand maintain militaryskills.More training time is possible,<br />
but when it conflicts too much with a civilian career and<br />
family life it jeopardizes retention of personnel.<br />
Despitethe dedicationof allinvolved,there are inherentlimits<br />
to what we can expect of the Guard and Reserves. Nonetheless,<br />
the Guard and Reservesare and must remain an instant, keycomponent<br />
of our nation’s defense, a new role for these talanted<br />
forces.<br />
Week of July 14, <strong>1986</strong>
● 1<br />
E<br />
J<br />
U<br />
E<br />
S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
In Debt Up to Our Ears<br />
<strong>The</strong> United States is a world leader for democratic, industrial,<br />
agricultural and scientific achievements. On the darker side<br />
the United States is also the world’slargestdebtor nation. A debtor<br />
nation relies on foreign investmentsto finance its economy.<br />
Our new debtor nation status hangs as a noose around the<br />
economicneck of the United States;just as it does for Venezuela,<br />
Mexico,Argentina and many third world nations which titter on<br />
the verge of economic catastrophe.<br />
<strong>The</strong> debtor nation status jeopardizes the country’s economic<br />
health and security. For the last 72 years foreign nations have<br />
asked the United States for investment capital, but in 1981the<br />
tables began to turn and the USA now looks to foreigners for<br />
money to support investment and government spending habits.<br />
<strong>The</strong> federal governmentis the nation’s biggestborrower. Interest<br />
on the national debt already takes the first 15cents of every<br />
tax dollar collected. <strong>The</strong> old adage of “tax and spend” has<br />
been replacedwith “borrow and spend.” Instead of cuttingspending<br />
sufficiently, raising taxes or using a balanced approach of<br />
both, the federal government has borrowed money to pay for increased<br />
spending and giveaways.<br />
It took 105years for the national debt to reach $1 trillion.<br />
Now only sixyears later, the national debt has doubled to $2trillion<br />
and President Reagan has a request before Congressto raise<br />
it further to $2.3trillion.That is a sad legacyto leaveour children.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ugly facts are startling. In 1970our national debt was<br />
$383 billion; $544 billion in 1975;$1 trillion in 1981,and over<br />
$2 trillion in <strong>1986</strong>. “Supply-side” economics has not increased<br />
the savingsneededto financethe federal government’shuge hunger<br />
for credit. Instead supply-sideeconomic policies of the last<br />
four years have resulted in an unhealthy reliance on foreign<br />
money. This dependencehides the real costs of deficit spending.<br />
Rather than creating hyper-inflation, or a recession, they have<br />
substituted record borrowing. <strong>The</strong> nation’s borrowing spree has<br />
produced record trade deficits and doubled the national debt.<br />
<strong>The</strong> merchandisetrade deficitgrewfrom $25.5billionin 1980<br />
to over $148billion in 1985.<strong>The</strong> U.S. Department of Commerce<br />
estimates that 25,000 American jobs are lost or not created for<br />
every $1 billion increase in the trade deficit. To make matters<br />
worse, economists do not see any quick reversal of the nation’s<br />
trade deficit.<br />
To restore our international economic standing the federal<br />
government must reduce its demand for credit. Cutting deficit<br />
spending and reforming the federal budget process is the key to<br />
reducingthe trade deficit. Unfortunately, the legislativegimmick<br />
known as the Gramm-Rudman law targets spendingcuts in ordy<br />
about one-half of the total federal budget while protecting the<br />
rest from cuts.<br />
If there is a silver lining in the nation’s debtor status, it is<br />
that it might act as a catalystto prompt action. <strong>The</strong> nation’s debtor<br />
status is a warning signalthat all is not well.<strong>The</strong> United States<br />
must heed the warning and act befo=the noose strangles the<br />
e<br />
c
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
A 2<br />
‘ L<br />
S H A<br />
t<br />
N<br />
S A C a<br />
S Z I a<br />
hearing at the request of the Nebraska Legislature. It will be<br />
held Thursday, August 28th at 9 U<br />
Nebraska-Lincoln, East Campus U<br />
y n e p<br />
a a y a e<br />
E c p f v<br />
p S b f e<br />
e s s A<br />
A<br />
r a p<br />
d c p s c<br />
w m A a a<br />
f a A<br />
a d r w<br />
o<br />
O<br />
w v<br />
c c ‘ p<br />
d f r<br />
1 w e a p<br />
t d p u<br />
a w a a<br />
In y e f a<br />
d
percent of production; back near a level where they more<br />
traditionally<br />
have been.<br />
Over y United States has aided many countries<br />
with technology in an effort to help them be food<br />
self-sufficient. This is an honorable task but it has taken a<br />
further toll on United States farm exports. By helping some<br />
c e t p c<br />
s<br />
a<br />
e m icompeting<br />
ourselves with our own money.<br />
So why have a Senate hearing i[] ~i~ti~aska? ??irsk, too many<br />
W e e t t p<br />
t s p g b<br />
R A w p A<br />
s b F<br />
r s b o b p<br />
p<br />
e<br />
9<br />
people participate<br />
in finding the solutions.<br />
Part of the solution may be production controls. Earlier<br />
this s D A p<br />
c a w p r<br />
c b t H a<br />
the h r w<br />
w f w a p c r<br />
the surpluses and improve pri{:e:;.<br />
I encourage farmers and farm organization officials to<br />
attend the hearing. Agriculture is our priority. If agriculture<br />
hurts, all Nebraska<br />
feels the pain.<br />
-0<br />
—---<br />
A
Senate Needs Efficiency to Finish Work<br />
<strong>The</strong> Congresshas four weeksto complete all of its business<br />
before its scheduled adjournment on October 3rd. We may not<br />
make it. I am for staying on the job until we do it right. Still remaining<br />
on the work calendar are a number of substantial pieces<br />
of legislationincluding President Reagan’s request to again increase<br />
the debt ceiling, the defense budget, the tax reform bill,<br />
the deficit restraints, most of the authorization and appropriations<br />
bills and more.<br />
In agriculture I will be using the suggestionsof those who<br />
testified at the Senate hearing in Lincoln to initiate changes in<br />
the current Farm Bill by administrative action. <strong>The</strong>re probably<br />
is not time for extensivelegislativeremedy this year. It is clear<br />
that the Administration’sFarm Billis a disaster, as I warned early<br />
in opposing it.<br />
Awaiting final action is President Reagan’s annual request<br />
to again increase the national debt ceiling, this time to $2.3 trillion.<br />
When he became President, the national debt was lessthan<br />
$1 trillion. latest request has been convenientlystalledby the<br />
so-calledGramm-Rudman “fro.” <strong>The</strong> “fix” was crafted after the<br />
automatic budget cutting provision in the original Gramm-<br />
Rudman law was ruled unconstitutional.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “fix” is an unnecessary delaying tactic. <strong>The</strong> original<br />
Gramm-Rudmanlaw containeda backup provisionwhichrequires<br />
the Congress to vote on the formula budget cuts if the U.S.<br />
Supreme Court ruled the automatic across-the-board cuts provision<br />
unconstitutional. <strong>The</strong> new proposed “fix” transfers budget<br />
cuttingfrom the Congressto the Directorof the Officeof Managementand<br />
Budget.I firmlybelieveCongressshouldfollowthe Constitution<br />
and vote on the budget cuts rather than pass the deficit<br />
buck to a non-elected bureaucrat of the executivebranch. Taxpayers<br />
elected Congressto make tough decisions.Voters should<br />
knowwheretheir electedofficialsstand on thesebudgetquestions.<br />
I opposed the “fix,” just as I opposed the original Gramm-<br />
Rudman law. It is one more Congressionalcop-out to avoid the<br />
responsibility of individual budget cuts. <strong>The</strong> Gramm-Rudman<br />
legislationis being used again, just as it was the first time, to disguisethe<br />
voteto increasethe national debt ceilingto a new record<br />
of $2.3trillion. It is ironic the Gramm-Rudman supporters claim<br />
that by raising the national debt Congresscan reduce the deficit.<br />
If Gramm-Rudman is so good, Congress should vote cin it<br />
separately and not tie it to the debt ceiling.<br />
I will also be participating in Senate-House conference on<br />
the 1987DefenseAuthorization bill. We must get defense spending<br />
under control whilemaintainingan adequate defense.We will<br />
be continuing our Armed ServicesCommittee careful review of<br />
the vitalongoingnegotiationswith the Sovietson arms reductions.<br />
That is the only real long-term possibility to a safer world.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are many more important items which must be addressedbefore<br />
adjournment. Unfortunately, procrastination will<br />
once again translate into long days and weeks for the Senate.<br />
Week of September 15, <strong>1986</strong>
E<br />
J E<br />
U S S<br />
F N<br />
D<br />
Attacking Ethanol Hurts Agriculture<br />
<strong>The</strong> recently released U.S. Department of Agriculture<br />
(USDA) report entitled “<strong>The</strong> Fuel Ethanol and Agriculture Economic<br />
AssessmentReport’ is another slap in the face to America’s<br />
farmers. Make no mistake about it, this report is not in tune<br />
with America’s agriculture or our national energy goals.<br />
<strong>The</strong> report is based on faulty assumptionsthat contradict the<br />
goal of increasing demand for agricultural products. It is disappointing<br />
that the USDA intends to disrupt the development of<br />
ethanol in the United States.<br />
<strong>The</strong> USDA report claimsthat ethanol programs are not cost<br />
effective. Not so. A 1985study conducted at Purdue University<br />
found that ethanol programs saved the federal government $227<br />
million.Aiding the developmentof the ethanol industry now will<br />
be worthwhile for the nation in the long run.<br />
<strong>The</strong> report failsto recognizethe valuablecontributionethanol<br />
has made toward lesseningthe United States’dependencyon foreign<br />
oil. Instead the USDA report concludes it would be more<br />
economicalto increasefarmer subsidiesand eliminatethe ethanol<br />
programs.<br />
Farmers don’t want a handout as the USDA report implies;<br />
farmers want a fair price in the market. Undercutting the ethanol<br />
industry by eliminatingprograms would be a step backwards especially<br />
when we are looking for markets to buy agricultural<br />
products.<br />
Ethanol is a bargain for America, but like agriculture, it is<br />
beingchallengedby federalbureaucrats, not by technicalproblems<br />
or environmental concerns.<br />
<strong>The</strong> federal government should promote the unification of<br />
the ethanol and agricultural industries. <strong>The</strong> ethanol industry is<br />
more than just a good market for U.S. farmers, it is a sound investment<br />
for America as a hedge against OPEC domination.<br />
<strong>The</strong> one positiveitem of the report is that it correctly states<br />
that ethanol production raises net farm income. It also correctly<br />
states that ethanol is an excellentoctane enhancer for gasoline.<br />
Both are true statements and carry great weight; yet the USDA<br />
report even tries to disregard these important facts.<br />
<strong>The</strong> basic foundation of our economy is agriculture, but our<br />
country is driven by carburetors. In that sense, agriculture and<br />
ethanol are important ingredients to our national defense.<br />
Week of September 29, <strong>1986</strong>
AmericanGold Coins: <strong>The</strong>y’reHere!<br />
A goal became reality this fall<br />
when the U.S. Mint, authorized by<br />
legislationI introduced, cast the first<br />
“American Eagle” gold coins. Production<br />
of the gold coins in September<br />
culminated more than a year of<br />
work to have the United States mint<br />
the first regular issue gold coins in<br />
more than 50 years.<br />
This effort began with the bill’s<br />
introduction in February 1985,which directed the U.S. Treasury<br />
to mint American gold coins to compete against the then popular<br />
South African Krugerrandgold coins.By December1985,both<br />
Houses of Congress had unanimously approved the bill and the<br />
President had signed it into law.<br />
One very important aspect of this legislation is that profits<br />
from the sale of the American gold coins must be used to reduce<br />
the $2.3 trillion national debt. This mandate specificallyprevents<br />
gold coin profits from being used to further expand federal<br />
spending.<br />
<strong>The</strong> American Eagle gold coins are scheduled to be available<br />
for purchaseby early November,just in time for the holidays.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “American Eagle” gold coins willbe availablein four sizes:<br />
one ounce, one-half ounce, one-quarter ounce and one-tenth<br />
ounce. This array of sizeswill allow Americans of any financial<br />
means to invest in American gold in the denominations they can<br />
afford.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y will be sold through retail outlets and be priced competitivelywith<br />
the Canadian Mapleleaf, ChinesePanda and South<br />
African Krugerrand gold coins.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “American Eagle” coin design represents the values of<br />
our great nation; liberty, family and freedom, <strong>The</strong> coins carry<br />
the AugustusSaint-Gaudens depiction of liberty which appeared<br />
on American $20gold piecesbetween 1907to 1933.<strong>The</strong> reverse<br />
side displays a family of Eagles, symbolic of American family<br />
values,<br />
Foreign coins proved there is a US. market for gold coins.<br />
Americans now spend more than $1 biIlion annually on foreign<br />
gold coins, That is money leaving our economy for investment<br />
in other countries. I introduced the American gold coin bill to<br />
giveAmericans an alternative to foreign gold coins so they could<br />
investin the United States and help our economyby reducingthe<br />
national debt.<br />
<strong>The</strong> sale of American gold coins wilI also heIp reduce the<br />
growingUnited States trade deficit. <strong>The</strong> enormous international<br />
interest shown in the “American Eagle” gold coins signalsthat<br />
they willbe strong contenders in the competitiveworld gold bullion<br />
market and be a bright spot in America’sinternational trade.<br />
Individualswho wish to receiveinformation about the availabilityof<br />
proof coinsand to have their name added to the United<br />
States mint mailing list should write to the U.S. Mint, Account<br />
Maintenance, 10001Aerospace Road, Lanham, MD. 20706.<br />
1