20.11.2014 Views

Agrarian and Peasant Parties in the Czech Republic - Masarykova ...

Agrarian and Peasant Parties in the Czech Republic - Masarykova ...

Agrarian and Peasant Parties in the Czech Republic - Masarykova ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SMV/) 1 While all <strong>the</strong>se parties did emerge between November 1989 <strong>and</strong> April 1990, only some<br />

of <strong>the</strong>m were able to participate <strong>in</strong>dependently <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first free parliamentary election <strong>in</strong> June<br />

1990.<br />

Two major agrarian parties, #SSZ <strong>and</strong> Political Movement of Agricultural Cooperatives’<br />

Members, toge<strong>the</strong>r with several o<strong>the</strong>r m<strong>in</strong>or parties entered <strong>in</strong>to coalition called Alliance of<br />

Farmers <strong>and</strong> Countryside (Spojenectví zem$d$lc% a venkova /SZV/), which can be seen as <strong>the</strong><br />

most relevant representation of agrarian <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first stage of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Czech</strong> party system’s<br />

development. It is important to note although SZV did not manage to get over 5 % threshold<br />

guarantee<strong>in</strong>g parliamentary representation, still it succeeded <strong>in</strong> collect<strong>in</strong>g quite a substantial<br />

number of votes – <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> election to both chambers of <strong>Czech</strong>oslovak federal parliament SZV got<br />

3,77 % of <strong>the</strong> vote, or 3,99 % respectively, while <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> election to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Czech</strong> National Council<br />

(national parliament of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Czech</strong> <strong>Republic</strong>) it did receive as much as 4,11 % of <strong>the</strong> vote (which<br />

amounts to almost 300.000 votes). The o<strong>the</strong>r agrarian parties did not participate directly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

election – ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y placed <strong>the</strong>ir c<strong>and</strong>idates on lists of o<strong>the</strong>r parties 2 , or <strong>the</strong>y withdrew <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

participation, as <strong>the</strong>y knew <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fluence was much too small to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m any success.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong>y tested <strong>the</strong>ir ability to attract voters <strong>in</strong> local elections held <strong>in</strong> November 1990.<br />

Once aga<strong>in</strong>, by far <strong>the</strong> best results were achieved by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Czech</strong>oslovak <strong>Agrarian</strong> Party, which got<br />

1,52 % of <strong>the</strong> vote (amount<strong>in</strong>g to 1.669 m<strong>and</strong>ates), <strong>and</strong> by Political Movement of Agricultural<br />

Cooperatives’ Members receiv<strong>in</strong>g 0,93 % of <strong>the</strong> vote (amount<strong>in</strong>g to 1.410 m<strong>and</strong>ates), while none<br />

of o<strong>the</strong>r agrarian parties were able to get more than 0,05 % of <strong>the</strong> vote. Obviously, while <strong>the</strong>se<br />

local elections confirmed <strong>the</strong>re is some, although little dem<strong>and</strong> for agrarian parties, primarily <strong>the</strong>y<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated agrarian electorate would only be limited.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce early fall of 1990 we could have witnessed <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g tendencies to unite fragmented<br />

spectrum of <strong>Czech</strong> agrarian parties, so that <strong>the</strong>y could possess a chance to successfully compete<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r parties. There were two major attempts – while <strong>the</strong> first one, aspir<strong>in</strong>g to create a new<br />

party composed of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Czech</strong>oslovak <strong>Agrarian</strong> Party, Political Movement of Agricultural<br />

Cooperatives’ Members, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Republic</strong>an Party of <strong>Czech</strong>oslovakian Countryside, failed <strong>in</strong> January<br />

1991 after prolonged negotiations, <strong>the</strong> next enterprise succeeded. However, this time <strong>the</strong> goal<br />

was a bit different: parties participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> project did not seek unification, ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y<br />

<strong>in</strong>tended to constitute a broad coalition represent<strong>in</strong>g also o<strong>the</strong>r political options. Liberal-Social<br />

1 For a brief survey of details on party programmes <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r differences see Mareš, Pšeja 2005: 1605-7.<br />

2 The Free <strong>Peasant</strong>s’ Party was on <strong>the</strong> list of <strong>the</strong> Christian <strong>and</strong> Democratic Union (K!es"anská a demorkatická<br />

unie). This coalition of <strong>Czech</strong>oslovak People’s Party, Christian Democratic Party <strong>and</strong> several small subjects won<br />

8,42% to <strong>Czech</strong> National Council, 8,75% to <strong>the</strong> Chamber of Nations of <strong>the</strong> Federal Assembly <strong>and</strong> 8,69% to <strong>the</strong><br />

Chamber of People of <strong>the</strong> Federal Assembly.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!