20.11.2014 Views

Front Cover May - WorldCargo News Online

Front Cover May - WorldCargo News Online

Front Cover May - WorldCargo News Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WorldCargo</strong><br />

news<br />

Chennai ahead of target<br />

Chennai Container Terminal Ltd<br />

(CCTL), the P&O Ports subsidiary<br />

set up to operate the container<br />

terminal at Chennai in south India,<br />

is well ahead of the cargo handling<br />

target set for it thanks to new<br />

and modern container handling<br />

equipment brought in by the<br />

company.<br />

Under the terms of the 30 year<br />

concession agreement, CCTL was<br />

given the target of handling<br />

350,000 TEU in the first year of<br />

operations and 500,000 TEU by<br />

2006. By the end of March this year,<br />

CCTL had handled 424,665 TEU,<br />

an increase of 23 per cent over the<br />

previous year. “We will hit the<br />

500,000 TEU target by 2004,” said<br />

CCTL CEO Ganesh Raj.<br />

The increase has been facilitated<br />

by the installation of four<br />

new ship-to-shore cranes and 10<br />

RTGs, all ordered from Noell<br />

The gross crane rate at CCTL has increased to 18 moves per hour<br />

Crane Systems. On an average the<br />

terminal handled 38 vessels a<br />

month in 2002 against 20.5 in<br />

2001. The gross crane rate increased<br />

to 18 moves per hour in<br />

2002 from just eight in 2001.<br />

With all the new cranes now in<br />

service, the new target for 2003<br />

is 22 moves per crane hour.<br />

The average turnaround time<br />

for vessels came down to 24 hours<br />

in 2002 against 96 hours the year<br />

before. CCTL’s aim is to turn<br />

Chennai container terminal into<br />

a transhipment hub for the east<br />

coast of India.<br />

Subic pipe row smoulders on<br />

The Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority<br />

(SBMA) has dismissed suggestions<br />

that the bidding rules for<br />

the US$136.5 mill Subic container<br />

terminal project were<br />

slanted to prevent bids from Filipino<br />

steel pipe pile manufacturers<br />

(see World Cargo <strong>News</strong>, February<br />

2003, p6).<br />

The SBMA Bids and Award<br />

Committee is in the process of<br />

evaluating construction tenders<br />

from Nishimatsu Construction<br />

Co, Toyo Construction Co and the<br />

Penta Ocean Construction Co<br />

joint venture with TOA Corp and<br />

Shimuzu Corp. A fourth contender,<br />

Taisei Corp, pulled out just<br />

before the March deadline.<br />

“We will definitely sit down<br />

with PCI [Pacific Consultants International]<br />

to address the piles<br />

issue and get the technical evaluation<br />

committee of the BAC and<br />

JBIC [Japan Bank for International<br />

Cooperation] to come to a<br />

sensible and technically sound<br />

decision,” said Victor Mamon,<br />

SBMA senior deputy administrator<br />

for operations.<br />

Critics regard the exclusion of<br />

spirally-welded pipes as a violation<br />

of JBIC policy as its procurement<br />

guidelines state that “specifications<br />

shall be so worded as to<br />

permit and encourage the widest<br />

possible competition.”<br />

That provision may have been<br />

breached in the case of other materials<br />

required for the project. For<br />

example, PCI specified Prodegol<br />

PU coating from Goldschmidt TBI<br />

GmbH of Germany for the steel<br />

pipe, even though similar products<br />

are available from other countries.<br />

The Philippine Large Diameter<br />

Pressure Pipe Manufacturers’<br />

Association has expressed dismay<br />

over the SBMA’s failure to address<br />

the issue, saying it had contacted<br />

Victor Mamon last November -<br />

four months before the actual bidding.<br />

The association says three of<br />

its members are prepared to install<br />

a mill in Subic to produce<br />

spirally-welded piles with a maximum<br />

thickness of 22mm.<br />

According to local observers,<br />

if SBMA sticks to its preference<br />

for seamless and longitudinallywelded<br />

pipes, the most likely beneficiary<br />

would be Tokyo-based<br />

Nippon Kokan.<br />

Tanzanian<br />

ports push<br />

inland<br />

Port authorities managing the<br />

main four Tanzanian ports of Dares-Salaam,<br />

Mtwara, Tanga and<br />

Zanzibar have launched a concerted<br />

campaign to handle a bigger<br />

share of the cargo market for<br />

the various landlocked states in the<br />

region, which are forced to import<br />

and export most goods<br />

through neighbouring transit<br />

countries.<br />

The four ports have a combined<br />

handling capacity of around<br />

6 mill tons per annum, somewhat<br />

in excess of current demand, and<br />

there is also substantial room for<br />

expansion at Dar- es-Salaam and<br />

Mtwara.<br />

The private consortium now<br />

managing Dar-es-Salaam’s container<br />

terminal, led by Hutchison<br />

Port Holdings (HPH), plans to increase<br />

capacity from 100,000 to<br />

200,000 containers/year by 2010,<br />

partly with the aim of attracting<br />

more contracts from countries in<br />

Tanzania’s hinterland.<br />

The territory covered by the<br />

modern day states of Burundi,<br />

Democratic Republic of Congo<br />

(DRC), Malawi, Rwanda, Uganda<br />

and Zambia has been served by<br />

Tanzania’s ports since long before<br />

the European partition of Africa.<br />

However, over the past 10-15<br />

years, the Kenyan port of Mombasa<br />

and now also the Mozambican<br />

ports of Beira, Maputo<br />

and Nacala have begun to provide<br />

increasingly stiff competition.<br />

With so many landlocked or<br />

virtually landlocked countries in<br />

southern and central Africa, the<br />

amount of cargo at stake is substantial.<br />

PORT NEWS<br />

San Diego digs deep<br />

The California Coastal Commission<br />

has approved a plan that will<br />

see the Port of San Diego’s 40ft<br />

harbour depth dredged to 42ft to<br />

accommodate larger vessels. The<br />

port, which has two cargo terminals,<br />

has suffered from shallow<br />

draughts and the inability of large<br />

ships to reach the terminals without<br />

first offloading part of their<br />

cargo or waiting for high tide. This<br />

does not affect its role as a car import<br />

port because car carriers are<br />

not especially deep draft vessels.<br />

The dredging project is expected<br />

to cost between US$9 mill<br />

and US$30 mill and will remove<br />

some 550,000 yds3 of silt from the<br />

port’s turning basin north of the<br />

Coronado Bridge. It is scheduled<br />

to begin in 2004 and will be completed<br />

in 2005.<br />

It is part of a five-year plan by<br />

the San Diego Unified Port District<br />

targeted at more than doubling<br />

container traffic at the port<br />

and hopefully turning the tide on<br />

the city’s money-losing shipping<br />

business. This year the port is expected<br />

to lose around US$7.6<br />

mill.<br />

Primary products handled<br />

through San Diego include bulk<br />

commodities such as sand, steel,<br />

lumber and paper. In addition, its<br />

refrigeration cargo handling facility,<br />

which opened last October, is<br />

expected to handle about 40,000<br />

containers/year (Dole). The National<br />

City Terminal, located south<br />

of the city, is a primary handling<br />

facility for automobiles and is favoured<br />

by Honda, Acura and<br />

Volkswagen.<br />

PD Port Services claims that the intermodal rail service over its Grimsby<br />

Container Terminal (GCT) on the Humber, UK is attracting an increasing<br />

number of main line operators and shippers to the twice/week feeder service<br />

provided by Norexcel between Grimsby and Rotterdam. The connection<br />

enables customers to switch north Britain origin/destination cargoes away<br />

from congested land routes to southern English ports, argues PD Port services’<br />

managing director Jerry Hopkinson<br />

12<br />

<strong>May</strong> 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!