20.11.2014 Views

1ee0ey1

1ee0ey1

1ee0ey1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A HOMELESS HUB RESEARCH PAPER<br />

Youth<br />

The term ‘youth’ is widely used in both academic and grey literature, and those writing<br />

about the topic of homelessness among Aboriginal youth have chosen to define it in<br />

multiple ways. Generally speaking, youth are classified as children to young adults, usually<br />

under the age of 21, but it is important to keep in mind these individuals could also<br />

have children of their own, and such definitions are context-dependent. The definitions<br />

of ‘children’, ‘adolescent’, ‘youth’, and ‘young adult’ vary from study to study. In their<br />

article about street youth in Canada, Kelly and Caputo (2007) acknowledge some youth<br />

programs in Canada are designed for people up to the age of 30; however, the common<br />

definition of youth in Canada is from 12 to 24 years of age. In legal contexts, youth usually<br />

refers to young people from 12 to 18 years of age (Kelly and Caputo 2007). Baskin (2007)<br />

defines homeless youth as those aged 15 to 24 who lack a permanent stable home – that<br />

is, those who are not living with family and not in the care of child protection agencies.<br />

In other articles about youth homelessness, Miller et al. (2004) contend the range is<br />

generally from 12 to 24 years of age, whereas Matsuba et al. (2008) define it as ages 16 to<br />

30 in the context of programming targeted to the ‘at risk youth’ category.<br />

When discussing housing needs and mobility of the<br />

young Aboriginal population, Clatworthy (2008)<br />

considers those aged 0 to 14 to be children, and<br />

those aged 15 to 29 to be youth. Thus, an author’s<br />

definition of ‘youth’ is very much dependent on<br />

what exactly they choose to study and the available<br />

participant pool (that is, the classification of a “youth”<br />

may be guided by the agency, service, program, or<br />

institution on which the research is based).<br />

Literature on this topic often differentiates<br />

between homeless Aboriginal youth and ‘at-risk’<br />

Aboriginal youth, however, few articles define ‘atrisk.’<br />

Some articles discuss risk factors that may lead<br />

to homelessness or characteristics of youth who<br />

are at-risk of becoming homeless (e.g. Miller et al.<br />

2004), whereas other articles consider homelessness<br />

as a risk factor for engaging in risky behaviour or<br />

finding oneself in dangerous or disadvantageous<br />

situations (i.e. one’s health, well-being, or life is atrisk)<br />

(e.g. Matsuba et al. 2008). Articles have failed<br />

to reach a consensus on what ‘at-risk of becoming<br />

homeless’ means or how it is determined. In a study<br />

that assessed the effectiveness of an employment<br />

training program for a predominantly Aboriginal<br />

group of at-risk youth, Matsuba et al. (2008) found it<br />

helpful to draw on McWhirter et al.’s (1998) definition<br />

of ‘at-risk youth’: those youth who are homeless, have<br />

dropped out of school, have a substance addiction<br />

and/or have a criminal record, and are therefore<br />

facing challenges securing stable employment as<br />

youths and possibly as adults. However, Matsuba<br />

et al. (2008:17) adjusted the definition of ‘at-risk’<br />

to align with the program they studied: “an at-risk<br />

youth is one who is homeless, is not in mainstream<br />

school, is unemployed or underemployed, misuses<br />

substances, has been or is in trouble with the law,<br />

and/or involved in an unhealthy lifestyle, and who is<br />

between 16 and 30 years.” As Matsuba et al.’s article<br />

demonstrates, the definition of ‘at-risk youth’ can<br />

change depending on the context.<br />

To further complicate this issue, the term ‘homeless<br />

youth’ is often used interchangeably with terms<br />

such as ‘street-involved youth’ (Marshall et al. 2008,<br />

Higgitt et al. 2003), ‘street youth’ (Kelly and Caputo<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!