ICI Committee meeting notes - 2010 - Recycling Council of Alberta

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Committee 

Meeting Notes 

February 16, 2010, 11:20 a.m. 

Red Deer Lodge, Red Deer, Alberta 

Goal: Encourage and assist the ICI and C&D sectors to responsibly manage 

their waste stream, assume product stewardship, increase recycled content 

and conserve resources. 

Objectives: 

• Promote ICI waste stewardship and reduction. 

• Promote construction and demolition waste reduction. 

• Encourage design-for-environment. 

• Recognize excellence in product stewardship. 

= Action Items 

Present: Claudia Boecking, Colin Carter, Kelly Dallyn, Lyle Hoffman, Mark Jette, 

Daryl McCartney, Cole Nelson, Natasha Page, Dave Schaaf, Trent Tompkins, 

Neil Wiens, Dan Zembal 

Chaired by Dan Zembal 

Organics Discussion 

Input received (December action item): email from Greenit Cleanit (composting facility in 

Edmonton) and two reports from Daryl McCartney. 

Neil listed the following already existing organics diversion activities: 

• Safeway – used to compost in Bowden, Bowden is closing, they’re now talking to Neil to 

compost at BioCycle 

• U of A – diverting institutional organics 

• U of C – large pilot on organics diversion 

• East Calgary – facility is up and running 

• Edmonton – biosolids program 

• Bowden – shutting down March 31, federal budget cuts 

Dave Schaaf said that lots of leaf & yard waste composting is already happening. More 

barriers for “processed organics” – committee should focus on solutions for processed 

organics while not excluding leaf & yard. Find composting facilities and collection 

infrastructure that can take every type of organics. 

Natasha has a list of all composting facilities in Alberta, including details of what material 

they take and what tonnages they process annually. 

Markets need to be developed. Overcome barriers / perception of product quality. The 

committee wants to find out costs to establish facilities, transportation infrastructure, 

markets, etc. Why is one company diverting and another is not? What motivates Safeway? 

Neil reported on the recent organics workshop organized by Green Calgary last week. 

160,000 t of organics are generated annually in Calgary. He said that pilots don’t work 

Page 1 of 3

ICI Committee Meeting Notes 

February 2010 


because volumes are needed to make large-scale composting happen. 

Daryl said that ICI organics are low-hanging fruit (larger volumes / concentrated at specific 

locations) and therefore are easier to deal with than residential organics. 

Dan asked that Sarah provide a summary of their workshop findings, and forward the 

powerpoint presentations to the RCA office so they can be circulated and posted on the ICI 

Committee’s web page. 

Daryl could give a presentation on the University of Manitoba projects. 

Cole – highlight cost savings: Calgary landfill $85/t vs. Bio-Cycle $50/t 

Daryl – keep in mind additional cost of source separation, but also benefit of GHG offset 

Dave S. asked what the goal/endpoint of the ICI Committee’s efforts are (“so we know when 

we’re done”) 

Visions: 

• Dave S. – being able to move the organics collection/processing ahead for Lethbridge. Fact 

sheet/instruction for municipalities to put organics diversion into place. 

• Neil – viable market close to where compost is produced. Need market for compost, 

collection/processing will come when market is established 

• Cole – wants to be able to facilitate synergies to divert organics 

• Daryl – short term vision: workshop at RCA conference or organics session, have speaker 

from Safeway and other larger ICI players (identify!), present best practices, economics. 

Workshop should be marketed to ICI sector, not just RCA members (ask Sarah Begg how 

she got all those big players to the workshop last week). 

Further discussion: 

• Cole – target customers that take large volumes of finished compost (residential customers 

per-bag needs are covered by big-box retailers and garden centres). Get contracts with 

Parks and Rec places. 

• Daryl – there is always a “need” for compost, but depending on $ there may not be 

“demand” 

• Natasha – who says we need “compost”? Look at broader “recycled organics products” 

which may include gas/energy generation, depending on feedstock. Create market for all 

organics products 

• Cole – let market decide what they want to do with the materials 

• Dave S – understand issues/barriers and identify resolutions for them 

• Dan – 3 big ICI players are targeting organics this year 

• Neil – issues/barriers: zoning and permitting (NIMBY issues). Need education on cost factor 

and long-term benefits 

Neil will forward a London, England study to the committee. The study says that anaerobic 

digestion is the most cost-effective way to deal with organics in that country. (Daryl 

disagrees – economics don’t work, power generation is expensive, much more costly than 

conventional) 



February 2010 

EPR Discussion 

No feedback received (December action item). 


Colin has been looking further into batteries and fluorescent tubes. There is a program for 

rechargeable batteries – Call2Recycle (formerly RBRC). They’re opening up the range of 

products they accept. Need more info on what they do with the batteries (especially the 

non-rechargeables that come mixed with the rechargeables). City of Edmonton is shipping 

batteries to Toxco – expensive shipping. 

Cole – $4.25/kg for EnviroSort to take non-rechargeable batteries. Fluorescent tubes 

covered by Proeco and Nu-Life, need education to let people know to make use of this. 

Dan – we need more info in writing / case studies, samples. 

Raise awareness of existing recycling opportunities. Solutions are out there, how do we get 

the waste generators to make use of them? 

Home Depot takes fluorescents from customers. Red tape re: ARMA / return-to-retail 

municipalities need to provide approval for businesses in their jurisdiction to become 

depots. Onerous for business headquarters to get individual approvals in each location. 

Best approach for stewardship / EPR? Electronics return-to-retail is common in US. Model 

needs to engage the business side. 

London Drugs takes back any old electronic item when you buy a new one there. E.g., you 

buy a new toaster, you can bring your old toaster to them for recycling (same with vacuums, 

any other electronics). They will also take back any Styrofoam and other packaging of the 

stuff they sell. This is not widely-known and marketed, though. 

As Arises 

Dan – C&D Program has not made it into the spring session of the legislature (bumped to 

probably fall 2010). The Leadership & Advocacy committee is dealing with this. 

Cole – suggested that he could organize a council forum for RCA to present its case (on 

C&D). Council might then pass a resolution / take action / send letter to minister in support 

of the C&D program. 

Meeting adjourned at 12:30 p.m. 



Meeting Notes 

April 13, 2010, 11:05 a.m. 

Red Deer Lodge, Red Deer, Alberta 




Objectives: 






Present: Sarah Begg, Claudia Boecking, Grant Cameron, Colin Carter, Kelly Dallyn, 

Ray Dumouchel, Mark Jette, Jason London, Shane Mulligan, Cole Nelson, 

Leah Seabrook, Jodi Tomchyshyn, Ian Traquair, Deborah Wehnes, Dave Whitfield, 

Dan Zembal 

Chaired by Sarah Begg 

1. Green Calgary Organics Workshop presentation (Sarah) 

Sarah gave a summary of the recently held workshop. A summary flyer was included with the 

agenda package. In addition to the compost facility contacts included in the flyer, Dave W. 

mentioned that the City of Calgary’s East Calgary compost pad, which composts residential 

unprocessed organics (mostly yard waste) is going to open up to be available to ICI sector 

organics as well. Dave has contact information. 

Sarah mentioned that the City of Calgary is currently doing a 5-year waste composition study. 

2. Review actions from last meeting 

2.1. Review from Strategic Planning meeting in October: 

Sarah provided background on the October workshop discussions and outcomes. 

2.2. Actions/first steps to tackle Organics Diversion: 

Jodi suggested to contact Natasha Page at AENV regarding the recent recommendations 

regarding landfill bans. 

2.3. Actions/first steps to tackle Product Stewardship: 

• Find EPR model that encourages DFE and make recommendation to government 

with suggested products to start with. 

• Research on Packaging Stewardship Programs – What works? 

• Get a product stewardship program for the province for florescent bulbs and batteries 

• Research on packaging stewardship: Urban vs Rural 



April 2010 


Jodi reported that the Alberta government has endorsed the CCME’s Canada-wide Action 

Plan on EPR which includes a priority list of products to create programs for (first on the list 

= packaging). EPR has not been proven to be the best model to influence Design for 

Environment (DfE). Jodi could give a presentation to the committee about the Canada-wide 

Action Plan. Brenna McLennan (AENV) could give a presentation to the committee about 

the status of the national program for fluorescent bulbs. 

Sarah asked what the ICI committee could do to help support the Action Plan. Jodi would 

like to hear some ideas on what the committee does NOT want to see in terms of programs, 

what does NOT work / what does work, which features of current Alberta programs are seen 

as an absolute “must” in future programs. She can then bring this feedback to the CCME’s 

committee that she sits on and use this feedback to inform early plans to develop a 

packaging and printed materials stewardship program for Alberta. 

Sarah and Olena will look into the difference between EPR programs and stewardship 

programs. 

EPR program assign responsibility for program management and costs to the producers of 

the material. E.g. Packaging manufacturers, distributors and importers would be 

responsible for designing, implementing and funding the program. 

Product Stewardship programs assign responsibility for the management and costs of a 

program to a third party: government, a non-government ENGO, etc. For example, Alberta 

Recycling manages the tire recycling program. 

3. The last 2 meetings after the strategic planning session have been spent on a lot of 

discussion and brainstorming. There have been a lot of good ideas and high level 

potential outcomes. We need to get down a level and think about what are some 

concrete projects or actions that the ICI Committee can do to move these priority 

areas forward. – Here are some ideas: 

3.1. Organics 

3.1.1. research and provide list of all companies in Alberta that do organics collection. 

Add to Enviro-business guide if they aren’t there already (1-2 people) 

– Ray, Olena and Sarah will develop survey questions to send to all RCA 

members. Find out which organics generators have a program to divert 

these from landfill / identify case studies. Potential to find out about 

organics processors that we didn’t already know about. 

– Natasha Page has a comprehensive list of organics processing facilities in 

Alberta. 

3.1.2. Research and provide list of ICI members that do organics collection at their 

facility (survey ICI members? Have them describe their process?) 1-2 people 

– Leah will look at companies in the Edmonton area and report back at the 

next meeting 

– Green Calgary’s website pretty much already covers what Calgary area 

businesses do 

3.1.3. research and provide list of case studies from across Canada (Committee did a 

bit of this post Dec meeting. Do we want to add to this list, or leave it?) 





3.1.4. Develop online resource for ICI sector and how they might start organics 

collection at their facility to post on RCA website 

3.2. Product Stewardship 

3.2.1. From Dec meeting: Look at Enviro Business Guide for fluorescent tubes, 

battery recycling – look up the companies and ask what they do (a couple 

people) 

4. Are there any other discrete projects/actions that committee members can sign up to 

and take on for the next meeting? 

Jodi said that she hadn’t been aware of London Drugs’ take-back program and asked if RCA 

could promote things like this more. 

The committee wants to feature at least one story about a “ICI Hero” in the Connector 

newsletter. The next issue will come out in May, deadline for submitting stories is the end of 

April. This would promote good programs to our membership and therefore provide value to the 

membership. The committee doesn’t want to limit stories to what RCA members are doing. 

Progressive Company Contact Committee member who will pursue 

getting a Connector story from them 

London Drugs Morie McCoslan Dan / Grant C 

Rona 

Home Depot 

IKEA 

Canadian Council of 

Grocery Distributors 

Safeway 

Environmental 

committee 

Allan Langdon 

Wal-Mart Andrew Telfer / 

Christian Shelepuk 

Proeco 

Lululemon 

HBC 

Maegan 

Sarah 

Sarah 

Grant C 

Ian 

Dan 

Wal-Mart was also suggested as a potential conference speaker (either Andrew or 

Christian). 

5. As arises 

C&D Program – Dan recapped on the status of the program. Mark reported on his recent 

meeting with Ken Faulkner at the Premier’s Calgary Office who suggested to educate all MLAs 

and also to target members of the Agenda & Priorities Committee and Cabinet Policy 

Committee on Resources and the Environment to ensure that the C&D legislation gets on the 

fall agenda. Timeframe: from now until August. Counter the misperception that the program is 

“another tax”. 

The recently developed “How to contact your MLA” document, along with the C&D speaking 





notes, will be forwarded to all committee members. Everyone is encouraged to contact at least 

one MLA between now and August. 

Grant suggested that the L&A Committee could also set up a document (speaking notes) that 

outlines good Alberta programs that have been implemented so far, and the successes they’ve had. 




Meeting Notes 

June 18, 2010, 2:50 p.m. 

Bluffton Community Hall, Bluffton, Alberta 




Objectives: 






Present: Claudia Boecking, Ray Dumouchel, Olena Juzkiw, Cole Nelson, Trent Tompkins, 

Deborah Wehnes 

Guests: Recycling Ambassadors Christopher Haseltine and Tristan Drozdiak 

1. Follow up discussion to lunch time presentation by Jodi on EPR Framework: 

1.1. come up with suggestions of materials that we DO and DO NOT want to see in an 

EPR program 

1.2. which features of current Alberta programs are seen as an absolute “must” in future 

programs (to take the CCME committee) 

Review of actions from last meeting: 

• Sarah/Olena re: difference between EPR & Stewardship – Jodi Tomchyshyn (AENV) 

presented on this topic over lunch today 

• Walmart conference speaker – Christina is in discussions with Walmart 

• C&D speaking notes were distributed 

Action for next meeting: Olena asked that everyone review the Canada-Wide Action Plan 

that was circulated to the committee and look at the list of products. From that list of products, 

select two that the committee should focus on. 

Brenna McLennan (AENV) will give a presentation at the August meeting on the national 

fluorescent lamps program. Natasha Page (AENV) will talk about landfill bans. 

Trent reported that Edmonton is currently handling fluorescent lamps from both the residential 

and ICI sectors. This is only possible as long as fluorescent lamps are not designated as 

“hazardous waste”. 

2. Action from last meeting: Leah to provide list of ICI members that do organics 

collection at their facility (Edmonton Area) 

No update – Leah not in attendance today. 



June 2010 


3. Develop a questionnaire for RCA members, asking what generators of organic waste 

have a program and what it looks like (to be included with a survey that another 

committee is doing) – should we ask any other survey questions at the same time? 

Cole provided some background on the origin and intent of this idea. Olena will draft and 

circulate potential survey questions to the committee for review by July 20. 

Trent reported that he got a call from Walmart asking about “de-packaging” and recycling of 

expired food items. Edmonton will run 17 trailer loads of packaged food through their cocomposter’s 

drums as a trial, the organic portion of the food items will be composted. 

4. Who wants to work on: Developing online resource for ICI sector and how they might 

start organics collection at their facility to post on RCA website? 

Olena asked Trent if the City of Edmonton had any resources of this sort. Trent said the city 

started accepting ICI customers in April when council gave administration the mandate to 

become a player in the market. Both the co-composter and the MRF will accept commercial 

waste now, and the city will also compete with haulers on bids for collection. This, however, is 

not widely advertised. Information can be obtained by phoning 311 in Edmonton, or at 

edmonton.ca. The city can collect bagged garbage and recyclables in the same bin (black bag = 

garbage, blue bag = recyclables). The different bags will be separated when moving through the 

pre-processing floor. 

5. “ICI Hero” in the Connector newsletter: brainstorm candidates and commitment to 

write a story 

Olena will send a story about CBE. 

Trent said that if the city gets a big contract next week, he could get that client to submit a story 

(bid is for full source-separated recycling & composting at over 90 sites in Edmonton). 

Athabasca is going to start collecting ICI waste/recycling as well. Calgary currently does it on a 

small scale. 

Ray said that once the university goes fully commingled, there would be a story to submit 

(however, the launch keeps getting pushed back). The switch would result in less vehicles 

coming on campus, all bins will be compactors which take longer to fill up, therefore making 

transportation more efficient and requiring less frequent pick-ups. 

Olena will inquire with U of C regarding a story about their new in-vessel composter. 




Meeting Notes 

August 17, 2010, 10:35 a.m. 

Red Deer Lodge 




Objectives: 






Present: Sarah Begg, Claudia Boecking, Kelly Dallyn, Ray Dumouchel, Warren Graumann, 

Carlos Hunte, Olena Juzkiw, Tami Rothery, Dave Schaaf, Leah Seabrook 

Via Phone: Brenna McLennan 

1. Select two products from Canada-Wide Action Plan that the ICI committee should 

focus on (action from last meeting) 

Olena had asked at the June meeting that everyone review the Canada-Wide Action Plan that 

was circulated to the committee and look at the list of products. From that list of products, the 

committee then would select two products to focus on. 

Olena suggested that fluorescent lamps should be one of the committee’s focus materials. 

Brenna said that automotive materials are not a priority material for her group at AENV right 

now. Rather, they’re focusing on packaging and printed materials (work to start soon, led by 

Jodi) and C&D waste, which are both high-volume material streams. 

Sarah suggested that ICI pick Packaging & Printed Materials as focus material #2, even though 

these are listed as two separate items on the CCME’s action plan. 

Dave suggested that the ICI Committee offer to provide feedback on CCME’s and AENV’s 

discussions regarding packaging as well, if Jodi can share details. 

Dave asked how to get the ICI sector to separate cardboard – some do it, others don’t. 

Barriers: more expensive / time-consuming / space issues / convenience / not mandatory. 

Ray suggested to encourage Connector readers to ask their grocery/retail stores where the 

5 cents fee for plastic bags is going / what it’s used for. In his experience, cashiers usually don’t 

have a clue. This would be a part of raising packaging awareness. 

Ray is chairing a meeting of western post-secondary education institutions – their focus tends to 

be on deferred maintenance. He feels that not enough educational institutions attend the RCA 

conference. Recycling / waste diversion is not on their radar, they have other priorities. Sarah 

said that change can’t be initiated from the outside, but rather a champion on the inside needs 

to take the lead to push for and implement recycling and waste reduction programs. 



August 2010 


The educational sector could be another focus for the ICI Committee – get them to change first, 

then expand into other commercial / industrial areas. 

Warren said that the processors should be pressured more. 1) They need to give customers an 

idea of rebates for the materials they ship (long-term projections); 2) Need to accept 

commingled or at least bagged-commingled material; 3) Service needs to cover whole province. 

Tami suggested to invite processors to have a conversation and identify the barriers to 

accepting commingled materials. Sarah said that she’s never been able to get more details from 

processors on their plans – they always keep their message very vague. 

Olena said that at the next meeting, the ICI Committee will talk about how they can promote 

Packaging diversion. Updates on discussions and findings will be published in each Connector. 

2. Brenna McLennan – presentation on the national fluorescent lamps program 

Brenna reported that she’s involved in a group that wants to develop a national EPR program 

for fluorescent lamps. Federal energy efficiency regulations will come into effect in 2012, at 

which point incandescent bulbs should be phased out and replaced with more energy-efficient 

alternatives. 

Environment Canada (EC) is developing national regulations and standards for the recycling of 

fluorescent bulbs. Provinces that already have regulations in place won’t be affected, but those 

provinces that don’t have their own will have to follow the national rules. 

Alberta Environment will wait for the national regulations and don’t have any own plans in the 

meantime. Fluorescent bulbs are not a large-volume waste item. 

Sarah asked if the ICI Committee could provide feedback into the national process. Brenna 

will check with EC at their next meeting on Oct. 25 whether she can provide the ICI Committee 

with documents to comment on. 

Olena said that CBE still finds fluorescent bulbs a challenge. Brenna will forward AENV’s 

fact sheet on recycling FLRs. Green Calgary also has a fact sheet, which had been shared with 

the committee at an earlier meeting. 

Brenna will write an article for the Connector about “what should we be doing right now with 

FLRs and what changes might come in the future”. The article will include a link to AENV’s fact 

sheet. Olena will ask Maegan for input into the article from Proeco’s perspective. The next 

Connector is due to be published soon – articles should be submitted to the RCA office by early 

next week. 

3. Leah to provide list of ICI members that do organics collection at their facility 

(Edmonton Area) (action from April meeting) 

Leah will provide this by the end of August and email it to Claudia for distribution to the 

committee. A student working for Leah is still working on compiling the list of which 

organizations send organics to the two composting facilities in the area (City of Edmonton, 

Cleanit Greenit). 



August 2010 

4. Olena – draft potential survey questions (action from last meeting) 


Olena has not started on this yet, but will have something by the end of August. Tami 

confirmed that the Governance Committee is still planning to do a membership survey, and will 

keep in mind that the ICI Committee wants to tack on a couple of questions to this survey. 

5. Online resource for ICI sector 

The planned Connector articles on fluorescent lamps, packaging, etc. will be the forum for ICI 

updates, rather than a website. 

6. “ICI Hero” Connector Stories 

Olena will send a story about CBE by the end of this week. 

Leah suggested a story on the Edmonton Folk Festival’s waste reduction initiatives. 

7. Reminder of RCA’s Travel Allowance Policy (conference subsidy) 

The policy was included in the agenda package. 

8. As arises 

Sarah mentioned Dan’s recent story in the Calgary Herald re: C&D recycling. What other 

pushes can we make? Ray suggested to lobby Alberta Infrastructure as well – they don’t seem 

aware about the upcoming C&D program, yet they make decisions about building funding for 

the post-secondary sector. Warren asked if anybody is leaning on the Home Builders 

Association – they should be doing what Dan did. 


Next meeting – December 14, 2010 in Edmonton (at U of A), in conjunction with the 

RCA’s Christmas Party. 



Meeting Notes 

December 14, 2010, 3:00 p.m. 

Alumni House, University of Alberta, Edmonton 




Objectives: 






Present: Sarah Begg, Claudia Boecking, Dan Danylak, Ray Dumouchel, Jennifer Martin, 

Cole Nelson, Scott Nicol, Tami Rothery, Leah Seabrook, Ian Traquair, Dave Whitfield, 

Dan Zembal 

1. Introductions & Mandate Review 

Tami opened the meeting and asked for round-table introductions. 

The ICI Committee doesn’t currently have a formal Terms of Reference (outlining powers/duties, 

goals & objectives, core membership, etc.). Tami asked whether the committee would want to 

develop a ToR document. 

Dan suggested that goals and objectives are already defined as above. An Annual Plan would 

be of more value for the committee, outlining what the group wants to accomplish in its 

5-6 meetings per year. Consistency (member participation) is important and needs to be 

improved. 

Tami committed to following up on outstanding action items. 

2. Minutes From Last Meeting / Action Items 

• Promote packaging diversion – publish results in Connector 

• Brenna to check into whether the committee would be able to see and comment on 

documents about the national fluorescents program 

Dan D. pointed out that AENV’s fact sheet re: fluorescent lamps is outdated 

• Connector articles / ICI Heroes 

Ray will submit a story about U of A’s 2010 organics diversion success by 

mid-January 

3. Review of 2010 

While reviewing past meeting notes, Tami noticed a lot of recurring themes regarding the ICI 

committee’s mandates and potential tools to use/implement. She said that these have been 

discussed enough and the committee should now focus on actual actions and solutions. 



December 2010 

4. Action Plan for 2011 


Tami, Cole, Ian, Sarah, Dave W., Leah, Ray and Dan Z. committed to forming the “core group” 

of the ICI committee which attends the majority of meetings thereby providing consistency. 

Communication between meetings will be conducted via email. Committee members should 

make sure to “reply to all” whenever critical information is shared. Tami will hold members 

accountable for the action items they committed to. 

In order to keep track of its information and documents, the committee’s agenda packages 

will now be posted on the ICI Committee’s web page for access any time 

(www.recycle.ab.ca/ici). 

The main focus / primary topic of the committee for 2011 will be Organics. Other topics that will 

be monitored (updates to be provided as/if they occur) are Packaging and C&D. EPR, Zero 

Waste Education and Provincial Regulations for ICI (similar to Ontario’s requirement that all 

businesses recycle) will be deferred to later, unless a major development occurs or a different 

direction is mandated by the Board. 

Organics discussion: 

• Ray said that the City of Camrose is starting an organics program. The committee could 

provide support and guidance to them. There currently is a pilot project planned that 

accepts food waste from U of A’s Camrose campus. 

• Dan D. said that the health region is doing organics diversion at 2 hospitals. Dan is in the 

process of developing procedural guidelines. 

• Leah said that Strathcona County is talking to both local school boards who want to tie 

into the county’s organics diversion program. 

• Green Calgary has a list of organics haulers. Leah also provided a list. Dave W. can get 

an up-to-date list of permitted organics processors in the province. Sarah said that the 

situation is changing almost daily with new haulers and processors coming up. 

• Cole asked how the committee wants to define organics (leaf & yard, processed, 

unprocessed, biosolids) 

• It seems difficult to identify the largest producers of organics. Grocery stores, institutions, 

hospitality industry – who would have stats on these? Sarah cautioned that there are big 

regional differences as well. 

Tami will send out an email to start further focus conversation before the next meeting. 

Committee members will be asked to vote on their preferred geographic area, type of organics, 

type of ICI sector to focus first steps on. Preferences should be explained (i.e., why choose this 

geographic area, etc.) and ideally accompanied by case studies. 


Next meeting – February 15, 2011 in Red Deer.

ICI Committee meeting notes - 2010 - Recycling Council of Alberta

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?