TSPi Support Tools document (pdf) - Carnegie Mellon University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1.3. Team Selection and Leadership Often, in a course, you will have limited say about who participates and who does not. However, you can decide which students are on which teams and who will have which roles on these teams. These are important issues, for the ability of team members to work together is the most important single factor in determining team success. Thus, if you do not know the students personally, you should get help from someone who does know them. Start by selecting those students you think will make the best leaders; then decide which engineers to put with each of these leaders. In doing so, try to form balanced and compatible teams. Often, in fact, the students themselves can help in deciding how to compose the teams. In this process, the most important step is to select motivated and capable team leaders. This topic is described in more detail in Chapter 5. Contents List of Forms Tool Instructions Copyright 2000 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. All rights reserved http://www.awl.com/cseng/titles/0-201-47719-X/onlinesupplements/1-3.htm [11/5/1999 10:31:02 AM]
1.4. Using TSPi in an Industrial Environment The TSPi is a scaled-down version of the Team Software Process (TSP) SM developed by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI). This introductory version is designed to teach teamwork principles in a graduate or upper-level undergraduate university course. It was designed for use in a supportive environment with a restricted team size and a relatively short-duration project. Most important, the instructors who guide this work must monitor and support each team. The material in the TSPi text should help working software teams, but if the project conditions are not relatively close to the environment planned for TSPi, the process will need to be tailored. The areas likely to most need attention are the team roles, the launch process, and team management. The most important limitation of the TSPi is that it does not address management issues. The principal problem with using TSPi in industry is that the managers want to plan the engineers' work and assign their tasks. With TSP and TSPi, the engineers do these things and the managers concentrate on coaching and supporting the teams. Without a major intervention, managers do not generally know how to support TSPi teams. Under these conditions, the process often does not work. The SEI has developed an industrial-grade TSP for larger projects and bigger teams. This industrial-grade TSP shows engineers how to apply the PSP in an industrial environment, and it addresses the changes needed in management culture. For further information on the TSP, contact the SEI. 2 SM Team Software Process and TSP are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University. 2 Information on the SEI, the PSP, and the TSP can be obtained at www.sei.cmu.edu. Contents List of Forms Tool Instructions Copyright 2000 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. All rights reserved http://www.awl.com/cseng/titles/0-201-47719-X/onlinesupplements/1-4.htm [11/5/1999 10:31:02 AM]
Page 1 and 2: Instructor's Guide for Introduction
Page 3 and 4: 5.3 The Team-leader Meeting 5.4 Tea
Page 5 and 6: TSPi Time Recording Log Instruction
Page 7 and 8: Copyright 2000 Addison Wesley Longm
Page 9 and 10: TSPi Forms TSPi forms Configuration
Page 11: 1.2. What the TSPi Is The TSPi proc
Page 15 and 16: 1.6. The Contents of This Guide Thi
Page 17 and 18: 2.1. Explaining Processes When you
Page 19 and 20: 2.3. The Benefits of Varied Experie
Page 21 and 22: 2.5. Keeping It Small In spite of t
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 3 Specific Course Suggestio
Page 25 and 26: 3.2. Instructor Preparation If you
Page 27 and 28: Contents List of Forms Tool Instruc
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 4 Course Overview This chap
Page 31 and 32: 4.2. The Principal Lessons of the C
Page 33 and 34: 4.4. Team Selection The TSPi proces
Page 35 and 36: 4.6. Team Communication Describe ho
Page 37 and 38: Chapter 5 Team Selection This chapt
Page 39 and 40: 5.2. Assigning Students to Teams Th
Page 41 and 42: 5.4. Team Size Five students per te
Page 43 and 44: Chapter 6 The PSP Refresher This ch
Page 45 and 46: 6.1. Quality Metrics The basic meas
Page 47 and 48: 6.3. Defects, Code Reviews, and Che
Page 49 and 50: 6.4. Program Size ● The principle
Page 51 and 52: 6.6. Estimating Project Completion
Page 53 and 54: 7.1. Why Have a Weekly Meeting? The
Page 55 and 56: 7.3. Conducting the Team-leader Mee
Page 57 and 58: Quality Plan SUMQ E/T X X X X X X S
Page 59 and 60: 7.4. The First Weekly Meeting You w
Page 61 and 62: 8.1. Launching Teams In the launch
Page 63 and 64:
8.2. The Development Strategy Stude
Page 65 and 66:
8.3. Team Planning The planning pro
Page 67 and 68:
8.5. Designing with Team In produci
Page 69 and 70:
are doing the reviews and whether t
Page 71 and 72:
8.8. The Postmortem At the end of e
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 9 Checking Forms and Data T
Page 75 and 76:
Configuration Change Request CCR E
Page 77 and 78:
9.2. The WEEK Form The first time t
Page 79 and 80:
9.3. The Configuration Change Reque
Page 81 and 82:
9.4. The Configuration Status Repor
Page 83 and 84:
9.5. The Inspection Report: INS The
Page 85 and 86:
9.6. The Defect Recording Log: LOGD
Page 87 and 88:
9.7. The Time Recording Log: LOGT E
Page 89 and 90:
Contents List of Forms Tool Instruc
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
9.13. The Size Summary: SUMS The SU
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
10.1. Launch Issues It is generally
Page 103 and 104:
10.3. Planning Issues If the teams
Page 105 and 106:
10.5. Design Issues Assuming that t
Page 107 and 108:
10.7. Test Issues Cyclic developmen
Page 109 and 110:
Chapter 11 Grading Team Courses A g
Page 111 and 112:
Joyce did well against two of the t
Page 113 and 114:
11.3. Overall Effectiveness On bala
Page 115 and 116:
12.1. The Shrinking Violet Shrinkin
Page 117 and 118:
12.3. The Hard Head Occasionally, y
Page 119 and 120:
7. 8. Above all, try to get this pe
Page 121 and 122:
12.6. Losing Multiple Team Members
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 13 The Rewards of Teaching
Page 125 and 126:
PSP Familiarization Exercise 1: Tra
Page 127 and 128:
TSPi Time Recording Log: Form LOGT
Page 129 and 130:
TSPi Time Recording Log Instruction
Page 131 and 132:
PSP Familiarization Exercise 2: Def
Page 133 and 134:
Defect Types 10 Documentation 20 Sy
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Copyright 2000 Addison Wesley Longm
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
43 SomeInteger := SomeInteger mod(T
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
43 Test := Test div N; {Find the le
Page 149 and 150:
TSPi Example Task Planning Template
Page 151 and 152:
TSPi Task Planning Template Instruc
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Code Code 5.00 103.25 6 3.11 64.23
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
9:19 9:43 24 Code I " " 9:43 9:55 1
Page 167 and 168:
27 Length := 6; 28 Offset := 48; 29
Page 169 and 170:
Defect Types 10 Documentation 20 Sy
Page 171 and 172:
PSP Familiarization Exercise 3 Answ
Page 173 and 174:
TSPi Example Task Planning Template
Page 175 and 176:
TSPi Schedule Planning Template: Fo
Page 177 and 178:
PSP Familiarization Exercise 5 Answ
Page 179 and 180:
B&I Build and integration 1.50 136.
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
TSPi Forms This supplement contains
Page 185 and 186:
TSPi Configuration Change Request:
Page 187 and 188:
TSPi Configuration Status Repart: F
Page 189 and 190:
TSPi Student Information Sheet: For
Page 191 and 192:
TSPi Inspection Report: Form INS Na
Page 193 and 194:
TSPi Issue Tracking Log: Form ITL N
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Date Number Type Inject Remove Fix
Page 199 and 200:
TSPi Time Recording Form: Form LOGT
Page 201 and 202:
TSPi Test Log: Form LOGTEST Name ..
Page 203 and 204:
TSPi Team and Peer Evaluation: Form
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Submit complete PIP to the quality/
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Totals Contents List of Forms Tool
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Lower Prediction Interval (70%) Tim
Page 219 and 220:
Unit test Build and integration Sys
Page 221 and 222:
TSPi Quality Plan: Form SUMQ Name .
Page 223 and 224:
Defect-injection Rates (Defects/Hr.
Page 225 and 226:
Plan ... TSPi Size Summary: Form SU
Page 227 and 228:
Plan ... TSPi Time Summary Form: Fo
Page 229 and 230:
TSPi Task Summary Form: Form SUMTAS
Page 231 and 232:
TSPi Task Planning Template: Form S
Page 233 and 234:
TSPi Weekly Status Reports: Form WE
Page 235 and 236:
Overview Introduction The TSPi supp
Page 237 and 238:
consolidation. Project status chart
Page 239 and 240:
Project Planning When are project p
Page 241 and 242:
Producing the quality plan Once the
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
How is the team's schedule status r
Page 247 and 248:
How is the team's quality status re
Page 249 and 250:
Cell formulas and links Quality sta
Page 251 and 252:
User Interface Contraints Impact on
Page 253 and 254:
TSPi.xls worksheets Worksheet forms
Page 255 and 256:
Field Assembly Phase Task Date Star
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Controls The TASK worksheet has two
Page 261 and 262:
The SCHEDULE Worksheet Overview The
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Productivity CPI Plan and Actual ne
Page 267 and 268:
The SUMQ Worksheet Overview The SUM
Page 269 and 270:
show all

TSPi Support Tools document (pdf) - Carnegie Mellon University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?