22.11.2014 Views

NLGRev 68-2[1].indd - National Lawyers Guild

NLGRev 68-2[1].indd - National Lawyers Guild

NLGRev 68-2[1].indd - National Lawyers Guild

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

editor’s preface<br />

By far the longest feature in this issue, Dianne Post’s “Legalization of<br />

Prostitution Is a Violation of Human Rights” is a response to a similarly<br />

thorough article in issue 66-3 of this law review entitled “Freeing Jane: The<br />

Right to Privacy and the World’s Oldest Profession” by Benjamin David<br />

Novak. 1 In that article Mr. Novak argued that the Due Process Clauses of the<br />

Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution confer a general right<br />

to sexual privacy that includes the right to work as a prostitute. This bold<br />

and controversial article did more than merely make a legal case against the<br />

continued criminalization of sex work. “Freeing Jane” also made the much<br />

larger political and sociological claim that legalizing prostitution would<br />

promote the public good by de-stigmatizing sex workers, decreasing sexually<br />

transmitted diseases and giving women more autonomy over their own<br />

bodies and sexual identity.<br />

Apart from its scholarly merits, “Freeing Jane” was intended to serve as<br />

an invitation to further discussion of an issue about which <strong>Guild</strong> members<br />

have long been split. It wasn’t at all surprising that the article immediately<br />

elicited both spirited approbation and dissent from readers. The <strong>Guild</strong> has<br />

a history of internal amicable disagreement on the question of the compatibility<br />

of women’s rights and certain forms of sexual liberation. The roughly<br />

contemporaneous twin phenomena of second-wave feminism and the sexual<br />

revolution passionately divided the <strong>Guild</strong> a little more than 30 years ago years<br />

ago when, at the height of what’s now called pornography’s “Golden Age,” an<br />

anti-pornography resolution was proposed at the <strong>Guild</strong>’s national convention. 2<br />

______________________<br />

Continued on page 128<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Lawyers</strong> <strong>Guild</strong> Review, formerly <strong>Guild</strong> Practitioner, is published quarterly by the<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Lawyers</strong> <strong>Guild</strong>, a non-profit institution, at 132 Nassau Street, # 922, New York NY 10038. ISSN<br />

0017-5390. Periodicals postage paid at New York, NY and at additional mailing offices. Subscription rates<br />

are $75/yr for libraries and institutions; $25/yr for lawyers; $10/yr for legal workers/law students; $5/yr for<br />

incarcerated persons; add $5/yr for overseas; $6.50/single copy, and should be sent to: 132 Nassau Street,<br />

# 922, New York NY 10038. POSTMASTER: Send change of address to: <strong>National</strong> <strong>Lawyers</strong> <strong>Guild</strong><br />

Review, 132 Nassau Street, # 922, New York NY 10038. Address all editorial correspondence and lawrelated<br />

poems, criticisms, articles and essays to: Editor-in-Chief, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Lawyers</strong> <strong>Guild</strong> Review, 132<br />

Nassau Street, # 922, New York NY 10038. Unsolicited manuscripts will not be returned unless accompanied<br />

by return postage. <strong>National</strong> <strong>Lawyers</strong> <strong>Guild</strong> Review is indexed/abstracted in Westlaw, PAIS-Public<br />

Affairs Information Service, The Left Index, the Alternative Press Index and in A MATTER OF FACT.<br />

Editorial Board: Nathan Goetting, Editor in Chief; Robyn Goldberg, Managing Editor; Ryan Dreveskracht,<br />

Articles Editor; Kathleen Johnson, Book Editor; Richael Faithful, Notes Editor; Alan Clarke, Marjorie<br />

Cohn, Riva Enteen, Peter Erlinder, David Gespass, Ann Fagan Ginger, Arnold Kawano, Silvia Lopez,<br />

Melissa J. Sachs, Brenna Sharp, Deborah Willis, Henry Willis, Lisa Wong, Lester Roy Zipris. The opinions<br />

expressed in the articles are those of the various authors, and each article is Copyright, 2011, by the author<br />

and by <strong>National</strong> <strong>Lawyers</strong> <strong>Guild</strong> Review.<br />

Advisory Panel: Elvia Arriola, Derrick Bell, John Brittain, Margaret Burnham, Erwin Chemerinsky, David<br />

Cole, Barbara Dudley, Richard Falk, Lennox Hinds, Sylvia A. Law, Staughton Lynd, Manning Marable, Ruben<br />

Remigio Ferro, Jitendra Sharma, Kenji Urata, Frank Valdes, Patricia Williams.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!