23.11.2014 Views

NDAU 2011 Report – Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening v1 1 17 ...

NDAU 2011 Report – Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening v1 1 17 ...

NDAU 2011 Report – Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening v1 1 17 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>17</strong> <strong>NDAU</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – <strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Prematurity</strong> <strong>Screening</strong><br />

<strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Prematurity</strong> (ROP) overall and by neonatal unit at which screening is expected<br />

Of babies discharged from neonatal care in <strong>2011</strong>,(to home or foster care), 12% (7,938/68,693) met<br />

the Royal College <strong>of</strong> Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH)/Royal College <strong>of</strong><br />

Ophthalmologists(RCOphth) criteria for ROP screening (1). There were four possible screening<br />

outcomes including ‘on time’ screening, ‘early’ screening, ‘late’ screening, and ‘no screening date.’<br />

Each was determined as follow:<br />

On time<br />

Early<br />

Late<br />

No screening date<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> ROP <strong>Screening</strong><br />

at least one ROP screening date took place within the RCPCH/RCOphth<br />

screening window, <strong>of</strong> multiple ROP screening dates within the window <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same baby then the first ‘on time’ ROP screening date was used for analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> that baby<br />

- If a baby was discharged from neonatal care before screening<br />

window began and screening occurred before the window began<br />

then the ROP screening was classified ‘on time<br />

the only ROP screening date recorded was before the screening window<br />

began<br />

the only ROP screening date recorded was after the screening window<br />

closed, or the baby’s first known screening was recorded as happening after<br />

their discharge from neonatal care.<br />

there was no ROP screening date recorded.<br />

Babies that did not feature in this analysis were excluded because they either (i) did not meet the<br />

RCPCH/RCOphth criteria, (ii) were admitted after the RCPCH/RCOphth screening window closed,<br />

or (iii) that died before the RCPCH/RCOphth screening window closed. See table <strong>17</strong>a and figures<br />

<strong>17</strong>a-c for the analysis.<br />

Table <strong>17</strong>a <strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> prematurity screening status for babies eligible for screening<br />

(All eligible babies with a final neonatal unit discharge between 01 January - 31 December <strong>2011</strong>)<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> ROP screening Number <strong>of</strong> eligible babies<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> all eligible<br />

babies<br />

On time 3489 44<br />

Early 1<strong>17</strong>4 15<br />

Late <strong>17</strong>66 22<br />

No screening date 1509 19<br />

Total 7938<br />

1. Royal College <strong>of</strong> Paediatrics and Child Health and Royal College <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmologists.<br />

Guideline for the <strong>Screening</strong> and Treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Prematurity</strong>. May 2008.<br />

<strong>NDAU</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – <strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Prematurity</strong> <strong>Screening</strong> <strong>v1</strong> 1


Figure <strong>17</strong>a<br />

<strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> prematurity screening status by neonatal unit at which a baby was eligible for<br />

screening and by neonatal network<br />

(All eligible babies with a final neonatal unit discharge between 01 January - 31 December <strong>2011</strong>)<br />

Level 1 neonatal units (n=41)<br />

<strong>NDAU</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – <strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Prematurity</strong> <strong>Screening</strong> <strong>v1</strong> 2


Figure <strong>17</strong>b<br />

<strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> prematurity screening status by neonatal unit at which a baby was eligible for<br />

screening and by neonatal network<br />

(All eligible babies with a final neonatal unit discharge between 01 January - 31 December <strong>2011</strong>)<br />

Level 2 neonatal units (n=73)<br />

<strong>NDAU</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – <strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Prematurity</strong> <strong>Screening</strong> <strong>v1</strong> 3


Figure <strong>17</strong>c<br />

<strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> prematurity screening status by neonatal unit at which a baby was eligible for<br />

screening and by neonatal network<br />

(All eligible babies with a final neonatal unit discharge between 01 January - 31 December <strong>2011</strong>)<br />

Level 3 neonatal units (n=42)<br />

<strong>NDAU</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – <strong>Retinopathy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Prematurity</strong> <strong>Screening</strong> <strong>v1</strong> 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!