23.11.2014 Views

THE LOUISIANA CIVIL ENGINEER - lasce

THE LOUISIANA CIVIL ENGINEER - lasce

THE LOUISIANA CIVIL ENGINEER - lasce

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case for natural channel design in Louisiana<br />

By Lee W. Forbes, PE<br />

The concept of natural channel design<br />

(NCD) only recently has been introduced to the<br />

water resources engineering community in<br />

Louisiana. Understandably, our water resource<br />

infrastructure improvement efforts have been<br />

focused on immediate needs such as coastal wetland<br />

restoration, drainage, and flood control.<br />

There has been little opportunity to examine<br />

more closely the effectiveness and the long-term<br />

sustainability of Louisiana’s extensive and intricate<br />

network of natural and improved conveyance<br />

channels. They are a seemingly boundless<br />

collection of<br />

• rivers<br />

• bayous<br />

• passes<br />

• creeks<br />

• cuts<br />

• canals<br />

• coulees<br />

• swales<br />

• ditches and<br />

• stormsewers<br />

that handle and convey the vast amounts of surface<br />

waters with which Louisiana is both blessed<br />

and cursed.<br />

Traditional flood control and drainage<br />

improvement design processes in Louisiana have<br />

focused on maximized conveyance to relatively<br />

unconfined outfalls such as the lakes and larger<br />

rivers, or to constructed regional detention areas<br />

and basins. These designs are rooted in attempts<br />

to employ channel configurations of the simplest<br />

geometric forms. This reasonably ensures that<br />

the flows through the resulting structures during<br />

larger storm events can be predicted accurately<br />

and thereby most effectively minimize the potential<br />

for flooding. However, such channel designs<br />

fail to recognize and manage the intrinsic variability<br />

associated with storm flows that — as a<br />

result — cannot be accommodated adequately<br />

by the resulting engineered structures. It will be<br />

attempted herein to demonstrate that it is incumbent<br />

on the engineer responsible for water<br />

resource design to understand and embrace a<br />

new paradigm — natural channel design. This<br />

is especially true here in Louisiana with our<br />

extensive and intricate network of conveyance<br />

channels.<br />

Natural channel design<br />

Natural channel design is an attempt to provide<br />

water resource improvements in — and<br />

restore impaired streams as shown in Figure 1 to<br />

— a state of natural channel stability or dynamic<br />

equilibrium. This is done through the understanding<br />

of fluvial morphology and its application<br />

via hydraulic design methodologies. Fluvial<br />

geomorphology is the science of the formation of<br />

riverbed, flood plain, and stream forms by the<br />

action of water. Though it has only become recognized<br />

in the United States in the last 10 years,<br />

this science is a vital component of water<br />

resources management and it is long established,<br />

well developed and documented through the<br />

extensive studies and writings of Luna B.<br />

Leopold, M. Gordon Wolman, E.W. Lane, David<br />

L. Rosgen, Richard Hey, and other hydrologists<br />

and fluvial geomorphologists.<br />

The schematic balance shown in Figure 2,<br />

developed by E.W. Lane (after Lane, 1955), presents<br />

an analogous, qualitative model of the predominant<br />

factors affecting stream equilibrium<br />

and the natural response of a channel to alterations<br />

in these factors in the form of degradation<br />

and aggradation. River systems express an<br />

inherent and entropic tendency toward minimum<br />

total work and uniform work rate in response to<br />

the natural variations of water and sediment<br />

loads that enter the system.<br />

Natural channel stability is characterized by<br />

the ability of a stream — over time and in its<br />

present climate — to transport the natural variation<br />

of water and sediment loads produced by<br />

its watershed in a manner that it maintains its<br />

Figure 1. Post-construction scene of a typical stream restoration project.<br />

(Image courtesy of Fuller, Mossbarger, Scott, May Engineers.)<br />

Figure 2. Lanes relationship of stream stability and the factors that<br />

affect degradation and aggradation (After Rosgen, 1996).<br />

Lee W. Forbes, PE, earned his BS degree in petroleum engineering from LSU in 1985 and his MS degree in civil engineering from LSU in 1988 with<br />

emphasis in environmental engineering. Forbes is a licensed engineer in Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Michigan. Currently employed<br />

as a Senior Engineer with Geomatrix Consultants in Houston, Texas, he has over 15 years’ experience in private practice with emphasis on environmental<br />

assessment and remedial design. In the mid-1990s, Forbes shifted his focus to natural channel design and sustainable watershed management with<br />

his work on several landmark projects in Michigan, full-delivery stream restoration projects in North Carolina and the development of natural channel<br />

design methodologies for the Gulf Coast region in Louisiana and Texas. He currently serves on the national ASCE Technical Committee for Urban Stream<br />

Restoration where he endeavors to integrate the disciplines of natural channel design into conventional engineering practice to improve and sustain water<br />

resources.<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>LOUISIANA</strong> <strong>CIVIL</strong> <strong>ENGINEER</strong> / MAY 2006 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!