Using Banner CAPP for Degree Audit at Georgia Tech - University ...
Using Banner CAPP for Degree Audit at Georgia Tech - University ...
Using Banner CAPP for Degree Audit at Georgia Tech - University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Georgia</strong> <strong>Tech</strong>’s Implement<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
of the <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>CAPP</strong> Module<br />
Presenters:<br />
Scott Verzyl<br />
Winnie Tsang-Kosma<br />
Present<strong>at</strong>ion Outline<br />
• Wh<strong>at</strong> is <strong>CAPP</strong>?<br />
• History of <strong>CAPP</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong> <strong>Tech</strong><br />
• Intended Use of <strong>CAPP</strong><br />
• Wh<strong>at</strong> Happened?<br />
• Effects of Semester Conversion<br />
• Outstanding Issues<br />
• The Current Plan<br />
• GT <strong>Degree</strong> Certific<strong>at</strong>ion Process<br />
• Wh<strong>at</strong> you need to know about using <strong>CAPP</strong><br />
• Questions and Answers<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 2<br />
1
Wh<strong>at</strong> is <strong>CAPP</strong>?<br />
• <strong>Banner</strong> Student System’s “Curriculum, Advising<br />
and Program Planning” Module<br />
• Provides functionality <strong>for</strong>:<br />
– Defining rules <strong>for</strong> programs of study<br />
– <strong>Degree</strong> <strong>Audit</strong> (individual or b<strong>at</strong>ch processing)<br />
– Advising (faculty or student self advise)<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 3<br />
History<br />
• In it from the beginning (beta site)<br />
• Particip<strong>at</strong>ed in focus groups with SCT to identify<br />
requirements<br />
• Particip<strong>at</strong>ed in extensive testing of compliance<br />
process <strong>for</strong> SCT<br />
• <strong>Georgia</strong> <strong>Tech</strong> has not modified <strong>CAPP</strong> (so far)<br />
• Original implement<strong>at</strong>ion goal was parallel<br />
processing <strong>for</strong> Winter ‘98<br />
• Implement<strong>at</strong>ion delayed several times due to<br />
outstanding defects with compliance process<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 4<br />
2
Intended Use of <strong>CAPP</strong><br />
• Phase I:<br />
– Replace Cyber (legacy system) templ<strong>at</strong>es<br />
– Primary tool to per<strong>for</strong>m initial degree compliance<br />
evalu<strong>at</strong>ion in Registrar’s Office<br />
• Phase II<br />
– Roll-out to academic units to per<strong>for</strong>m degree<br />
compliance evalu<strong>at</strong>ion and advising<br />
• Phase III<br />
– Make available to students and faculty via web <strong>for</strong><br />
advising, compliance review, and degree shopping<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 5<br />
Wh<strong>at</strong> Happened?<br />
• Responsibility of <strong>Degree</strong> Certific<strong>at</strong>ion Staff<br />
– 4 full-time employees on staff<br />
– One person dedic<strong>at</strong>ed 70% of time to testing and<br />
program build ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />
– Wrote in-house training manual <strong>for</strong> Registrar’s Office,<br />
academic units, and students (400 hours of ef<strong>for</strong>t)<br />
• Goal was to implement on Quarters <strong>for</strong> “practice”<br />
– Complete build of Quarter Curriculum Program Rules<br />
used <strong>for</strong> Winter, Spring and Summer 1999<br />
– Program rules built to work around known defects<br />
– Complete build of Curriculum Rules<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 6<br />
3
Wh<strong>at</strong> Happened (continued)?<br />
• Identified and addressed needs not met by <strong>CAPP</strong><br />
– Reports and various output<br />
• Schedule and Final <strong>Audit</strong> Reports<br />
• Commencement Program Report<br />
– Upd<strong>at</strong>e Processes<br />
• Assign Honors<br />
– Notific<strong>at</strong>ion Processes<br />
• Web and e-mail<br />
– Web <strong>for</strong>ms<br />
• Extensively tested each new release and addressed<br />
persistent defects<br />
– Summer 1999 - Most defects resolved<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 7<br />
Semester Conversion Woes<br />
• Programs are single-level specific<br />
• Multiple revisions of Curriculum Rules<br />
• Not possible to build rules to accommod<strong>at</strong>e<br />
quarter and semester course detail<br />
– Students will receive “semester” degree, but may be<br />
evalu<strong>at</strong>ed under a “quarter” curriculum<br />
• Students with both types of credit will be<br />
manually evalu<strong>at</strong>ed using a Crystal Reports<br />
worksheet.<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 8<br />
4
Outstanding Issues<br />
• Compliance Process<br />
– Repe<strong>at</strong>ed courses<br />
– Unused Hours<br />
– Single Entity Re-use (courses with <strong>at</strong>tributes)<br />
• Compliance Output<br />
– Too Long and complic<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>for</strong> casual user<br />
• B<strong>at</strong>ch Processing<br />
– Courses not evalu<strong>at</strong>ed in proper order<br />
– Must use popul<strong>at</strong>ion selection<br />
– One output mode does not yet work correctly, resulting<br />
in some students not printing <strong>at</strong> all<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 9<br />
Outstanding Issues (continued)<br />
• Product still being corrected by SCT<br />
– Previously corrected defects are resurrected<br />
– Users have little confidence in system, which results in<br />
manually double-checking the results<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 10<br />
5
The Current Plan<br />
• <strong>Tech</strong> will use <strong>CAPP</strong> <strong>for</strong> students with semester<br />
credit only<br />
• Will produce advising compliance <strong>at</strong> end of<br />
freshmen year<br />
• Will make <strong>CAPP</strong> available <strong>for</strong> advising Summer<br />
or Fall 2000<br />
• Students with Quarter credit will be manually<br />
evalu<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 11<br />
<strong>Degree</strong> Certific<strong>at</strong>ion Process<br />
• Student submits petition to academic department<br />
• Department evalu<strong>at</strong>es, usually with check sheet, and<br />
<strong>for</strong>wards petition to <strong>Degree</strong> Certific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
• <strong>Degree</strong> Certific<strong>at</strong>ion per<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>CAPP</strong> compliance<br />
• Results are noted and put on web <strong>for</strong> student to see<br />
• DC per<strong>for</strong>ms Schedule <strong>Audit</strong> (results compared with<br />
<strong>CAPP</strong> results)<br />
• Deficiencies and/or st<strong>at</strong>us are upd<strong>at</strong>ed on web<br />
• <strong>Degree</strong> Candid<strong>at</strong>e grades are processed<br />
• <strong>Degree</strong> Certific<strong>at</strong>ion per<strong>for</strong>ms Final <strong>Audit</strong><br />
• Deficiencies and/or st<strong>at</strong>us are upd<strong>at</strong>ed on web<br />
• Commencement<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 12<br />
6
Wh<strong>at</strong> you need to know about <strong>CAPP</strong><br />
• The more flexible the academic program, the<br />
harder to build the rules<br />
• All the <strong>CAPP</strong> screens look the same, easy to lose<br />
your place<br />
• Hierarchy is confusing<br />
• Almost too many options<br />
• Tie-ins to other parts of <strong>Banner</strong> are critical<br />
– Curriculum Rules<br />
– Repe<strong>at</strong> Checking<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 13<br />
Wh<strong>at</strong> you need to know about <strong>CAPP</strong><br />
• Running Compliances is time consuming<br />
• Requires good knowledge of Academic History,<br />
General Student, and Registr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
• Requires extensive training and gre<strong>at</strong> deal of time<br />
to implement<br />
• Does not work well with semester conversion<br />
• Still some outstanding defects<br />
• Output will probably not be acceptable<br />
• You will need additional reports and processes<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 14<br />
7
Wh<strong>at</strong> you need to know about <strong>CAPP</strong><br />
• Build Areas, Groups and Details on paper be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
entering in <strong>Banner</strong><br />
– You need a roadmap or templ<strong>at</strong>e to work from<br />
• Use consistent build methodology <strong>for</strong> all programs<br />
– Naming conventions<br />
– Codes<br />
– Rule structure<br />
9/9/1999 Office of the Registrar 15<br />
<strong>CAPP</strong> Hierachy<br />
Program<br />
Area<br />
Area<br />
Area<br />
Attachments<br />
Details<br />
Group<br />
Details<br />
Group<br />
Details<br />
8
PROGRAM<br />
BEE<br />
Program General<br />
Requirements<br />
AREA<br />
EE-MJREQ<br />
Area General<br />
Requirements<br />
EE-MATH<br />
Area General<br />
Requirements<br />
E-HSS<br />
Area General<br />
Requirements<br />
DETAILS<br />
List of EE major<br />
required courses<br />
by course numbers<br />
Courses with<br />
HUM <strong>at</strong>tributes<br />
and SS <strong>at</strong>tributes<br />
GROUP<br />
MATH1CALC<br />
Group General<br />
Requirements<br />
MATH2CALC<br />
Group General<br />
Requirements<br />
MATHDIFEQU<br />
Group General<br />
Requirements<br />
DETAILS<br />
Freshman level<br />
Calculus sequence<br />
Sophomore level<br />
Calculus sequence<br />
Differential<br />
Equ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Question Time!<br />
9