25.11.2014 Views

RemOx® EC Stabilization Reagent for In Situ Biogeochemical - IPEC

RemOx® EC Stabilization Reagent for In Situ Biogeochemical - IPEC

RemOx® EC Stabilization Reagent for In Situ Biogeochemical - IPEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RemOx ® <strong>EC</strong> <strong>Stabilization</strong> <strong>Reagent</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>In</strong><br />

<strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Biogeochemical</strong> <strong>Stabilization</strong> and Flux<br />

Reduction of NAPL<br />

K. Frasco and M. Dingens<br />

Carus Corporation<br />

J. Mueller, F. Lakhwala and A. Seech<br />

Adventus Americas <strong>In</strong>c.<br />

D. Foster and J Zubrow<br />

Key Environmental<br />

M. Brourman and M. Slenska<br />

Beazer East, <strong>In</strong>c.


The Challenge<br />

Primary Sources - Excavation and Disposal<br />

$100 to $250/yd 3<br />

Secondary Sources – More Challenging<br />

>$250/yd 3


What is <strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> Bio-Geochemical<br />

<strong>Stabilization</strong> (ISBS)?<br />

<strong>In</strong> situ biogeochemical stabilization (ISBS)<br />

describes an emerging remedial<br />

technology that entails the use of a<br />

modified permanganate based solution<br />

called RemOx ® <strong>EC</strong> <strong>Stabilization</strong> <strong>Reagent</strong>.


ISBS Technology Specifics<br />

• Encapsulation of the contaminant(s) of concern<br />

• Flux reduction of the aquifer<br />

• Limited mass destruction<br />

• Enhanced bioremediation after the stabilization<br />

is complete


Technology Development<br />

1997 - Conceptualization<br />

1998 – 2000 Proof of Concept R&D at UW and Adventus<br />

2000 - 2001 Pilot studies Camp Borden<br />

2002 - 2003 Phase I Pilot Denver<br />

2004 - Phase II Full Scale Denver; Bench testing Gainesville<br />

2005 - MGP NE Utilities; New ISBS <strong>Reagent</strong>s (patent<br />

pending)<br />

2006-Present – Licensed to Carus as RemOx <strong>EC</strong>; Field<br />

implementation in Alabama, Florida; Others pending


This work piqued our interest in the technology


SEM DATA<br />

Soil Treated with<br />

RemOx ® <strong>EC</strong><br />

Untreated Soil


Birnessite is an oxide of Mn and Mg<br />

along with Na, Ca and K with the composition:<br />

(Na,Ca,K)(Mg,Mn)Mn 6 O 14 .5H 2 O


Longevity of (X)FeMnO 2<br />

Mars Blueberries<br />

Petroglyphs


Crust Longevity<br />

• Kinetic geochemical<br />

modeling suggest<br />

crust life ~ 400 years<br />

(> 2,000 pore-volume<br />

flushes).<br />

• This may be overestimated<br />

because it<br />

assumes Eh (-700 mV)<br />

and pH (11)<br />

More soluble<br />

Eh-pH diagram from Hem (1985)


Denver, CO Site


Previous NAPL Recovery Ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

• Approximately 6,300 gal residual NAPL<br />

• Manual bailing (< 200 gal)<br />

• Low-flow skimmer pumps (< 10 gal)<br />

• 800-ft long recovery trench (< 55 gal)


5 g/kg vs. 18 g/kg NOD


Denver, CO Site


Soil Sample Prior to Treatment<br />

With RemOx® <strong>EC</strong><br />

Soil Treated With<br />

RemOx® <strong>EC</strong><br />

Samples taken from same depth three feet apart


Mass Removal<br />

COI (mg/kg) Average (n=4) Average (n=4) %<br />

Background Treated Reduction<br />

LMW PAHS 7,633.50 5,996.75 21<br />

HMW PAHs 1,961.55 1,744.55 10<br />

TOTAL PAHs 9,595.05 7,771.30 19<br />

* PENTA 236.00 55.67 76<br />

* TOTAL CPs 284.48 59.25 79<br />

* Excludes sample IB05A-14 to 14.5 ft bgs (80 v. 8 ppm dppenta + 296 ppm total penta)


Flux Reduction<br />

COI (mg/L) Average Average %<br />

Background Treated Reduction<br />

LMW PAHS 34.41 12.75 73<br />

HMW PAHs 6.05 0.11 99<br />

TOTAL PAHs 40.46 12.86 79<br />

* PENTA 18.91 9.66 49<br />

* TOTAL CPs 23.38 10.41 56<br />

* Excludes sample IB05A-14 to 14.5 ft bgs (80 v. 8 ppm dppenta + 296 ppm total penta)


Woodward Coke Site –<br />

Alabama<br />

• Former Coke plant demolished in 1998<br />

• Coke/coal fines are present near surface over a large<br />

portion of the site underlain by clay residuum and<br />

dolomite with karst related features (e.g. solution voids)<br />

• Localized areas of NAPL- impacted soil and<br />

groundwater are present<br />

• Higher dissolved phase concentrations correlate with<br />

presence of NAPL/Tar


• Fracture zone between 28<br />

and 30 ft bgs<br />

• Sample from fracture zone<br />

well indicated BTEX (473<br />

ug/L), Naphthalene (5,000<br />

ug/L) and other PAHs<br />

(2,500 ug/L)<br />

• Groundwater TOC (10.3<br />

mg/L) consistent with<br />

expected COI<br />

concentrations<br />

• Soil NOD testing indicates<br />

low oxidant demand (1.5 to<br />

1.6 mg/L KMnO 4<br />

)<br />

RemOx <strong>EC</strong> Area M-65R/B


10 Day Column<br />

SVOCs in Leachate<br />

(ppb)<br />

ISBS<br />

Treatment<br />

Control<br />

Naphthalene<br />

9.55<br />

58<br />

• 1% RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

Solution<br />

2-Methylnaphthalene<br />

Acenaphthylene<br />

Acenaphthene<br />

2.35<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

16<br />

ND (0.93)<br />

ND (0.93)<br />

• 85% Reduction in<br />

SVOC concentrations<br />

in column leachate<br />

Dibenzofuran<br />

Phenanthrene<br />

Anthracene<br />

Fluoranthene<br />

0.405<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

0.195<br />

2.70<br />

1.10<br />

ND (0.93)<br />

1.30<br />

Pyrene<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

0.45<br />

Benzo(a)anthracene<br />

ND (0.20)<br />

ND (0.19)<br />

Chrysene<br />

ND (0.50)<br />

0.45<br />

Benzo(b)fluoranthene<br />

ND (0.20)<br />

0.72<br />

Benzo(k)fluoranthene<br />

ND (0.20)<br />

ND (0.19)<br />

Total SVOC<br />

12.50<br />

80.72


10 Day Column<br />

SVOCs in Leachate<br />

(ppb)<br />

ISBS<br />

Treatment<br />

Control<br />

Naphthalene<br />

9.55<br />

58<br />

• 1% RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

Solution<br />

2-Methylnaphthalene<br />

Acenaphthylene<br />

Acenaphthene<br />

2.35<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

16<br />

ND (0.93)<br />

ND (0.93)<br />

• 41% Reduction in<br />

SVOC soil<br />

concentrations<br />

Dibenzofuran<br />

Phenanthrene<br />

Anthracene<br />

Fluoranthene<br />

0.405<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

0.195<br />

2.70<br />

1.10<br />

ND (0.93)<br />

1.30<br />

Pyrene<br />

ND (1.0)<br />

0.45<br />

Benzo(a)anthracene<br />

ND (0.20)<br />

ND (0.19)<br />

Chrysene<br />

ND (0.50)<br />

0.45<br />

Benzo(b)fluoranthene<br />

ND (0.20)<br />

0.72<br />

Benzo(k)fluoranthene<br />

ND (0.20)<br />

ND (0.19)<br />

Total SVOC<br />

12.50<br />

80.72


• MW-65B<br />

• Screened 21-31 ft bgs<br />

• DTW ca. 8 to 12 ft bgs<br />

• Historical DNAPL in<br />

fractured dolomite @ 25<br />

to 30 ft bgs


3 <strong>In</strong>jection Points<br />

2 Extraction Points<br />

MW-04<br />

IW-05<br />

Water Storage Tank<br />

IW-01<br />

1,000 G RemOx <strong>EC</strong> Mix Tank<br />

Rail<br />

Tracks<br />

MW-03<br />

20 Skids of<br />

RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

MW65<br />

IW-02


RemOx <strong>EC</strong> Field <strong>In</strong>jections<br />

May 2007<br />

• Traditional 5 point injection scheme into fractured<br />

Bedrock Geology<br />

• Target interval 20 – 30 feet below grade; 1,500 m 3 area<br />

• 80 Drums (37,500 lbs) of RemOx <strong>EC</strong> 4.5% solution<br />

• 4 Drums to 1,000 gallons of water <strong>for</strong> 20,000 USG of<br />

~1% injection solution<br />

•Average 20 PSI injection pressure. Permitted up to 50<br />

PSI<br />

• Average 1,000 USG in 1 hour 15 minutes (~13 gpm)


<strong>In</strong>jection Set Up Overview<br />

Water Storage Tank<br />

1,000 G Mix Tank<br />

Middle <strong>In</strong>jection Well<br />

Centrifical Pump


Top Left <strong>In</strong>jection Well<br />

Full Site Overview


Data To Date – Slug Tests


Gainesville, FL Site<br />

• 90 acre site; P&T in place<br />

• 2 nd NAPL issues; Grouting, steam, ISBS


8-days ISBS using<br />

Catalyzed NaMnO 4<br />

• COI mass reduced


Transmissivity<br />

• Column Leaching with<br />

“cores”<br />

• Buffered, Catalyzed<br />

NaMnO 4<br />

Figure 1 Cummulative volume of solution that leached through 200 g of site soil after 7 and 8<br />

days<br />

500<br />

450<br />

Volume (mL)<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

• Soil “permeability”<br />

reduced 98%<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Control 1% NaMnO4 ISBS #1 ISBS #2 ISBS #3<br />

Treatment<br />

Day 7 Day 8


Gainesville, FL Site


Gainesville, FL Site


Direct Push <strong>In</strong>jections<br />

DIP Parameter<br />

Treatment area<br />

Thickness of treatment interval<br />

Soil density (estimated)<br />

Soil mass within treatment area<br />

NaMnO 4<br />

to soil mass<br />

Mass NaMnO 4<br />

required<br />

Soil NOD<br />

Application rate<br />

Total vol 4.5% solution to inject<br />

Number of injection points<br />

Volume 4.5% solution per point<br />

Volume 4.5% NaMnO 4<br />

solution<br />

per layer<br />

Value<br />

2,000 ft 2<br />

20 ft<br />

94.4 lbs/ft 3<br />

3,778,000 lbs<br />

3.8 g NaMnO 4<br />

/ kg soil<br />

14,400 lbs<br />

122 g MnO 4<br />

/ Kg soil<br />

10 % of soil pore vol<br />

6,200 USG<br />

10<br />

620 USG<br />

155 USG


Direct Push <strong>In</strong>jections


Temporary <strong>In</strong>jection Points<br />

TIP Parameter<br />

Value<br />

Treatment area<br />

ca. 500 ft 2<br />

Thickness of treatment interval 20 ft<br />

Soil density (estimated) 94.4 lbs/ft 3<br />

Soil mass within treatment area 944,000 lbs<br />

MnO 4<br />

to soil mass<br />

3.2 g MnO 4<br />

/ kg soil<br />

NaMnO 4<br />

to soil mass<br />

3.8 g NaMnO 4<br />

/ kg soil<br />

Mass NaMnO 4<br />

3,600 lbs<br />

Application rate<br />

4 % of soil pore vol<br />

Number of TIPs<br />

2<br />

Mass 10% RemOx <strong>EC</strong> solution 4,800 lbs<br />

Total vol 10% solution to inject 500 USG<br />

Volume 10% NaMnO 4<br />

solution<br />

per point<br />

250 USG


Temporary <strong>In</strong>jection Points


RemOx <strong>EC</strong> Material Cost<br />

Denver, CO<br />

TOD = 18 g/kg<br />

Dolomite, AL<br />

TOD = 1 g/kg<br />

Gainesville, FL<br />

TOD = 122 g/kg<br />

Dense Alluvium<br />

KMnO 4<br />

@ 4.5 g/kg<br />

<strong>In</strong>jection Wells<br />

Fractured Karst<br />

RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

Push-Pull<br />

Sand/Silt<br />

RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

Direct Push and<br />

<strong>In</strong>jection wells<br />

1,273 m 3 area<br />

1,500 m 3 soil area 1,415 m 3 soil<br />

$31 -38/yd 3 $34 -38/yd 3<br />

3% solutions<br />

1% solutions<br />

1,850 USG/IP<br />

20,000 USG<br />

2-5 gpm (20 psi) 13 gpm (20-50 psi)<br />

Cost = $40 - 50/m 3 Cost = $45 - 50/m 3<br />

4.5 % solutions<br />

620 USG/DIP<br />

2-5 gpm (


Pore Volume Impacts<br />

• Gainesville TIP - 4% PV with 10% RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

(special case – not typical application)<br />

• Gainesville DIP - 10% PV with 4.5% RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

• Denver injection wells - 20% PV with RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

• Dolomite push-pull - 11% PV with 1% RemOx <strong>EC</strong>


RemOx <strong>EC</strong> Material Cost Estimates<br />

(125 m 3 ; n=30%)<br />

PV Replaced<br />

(vol required)<br />

5% (495 USG)<br />

1% Solution<br />

917 lbs RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

$1,650 ($10 yd 3 )<br />

4.5% Solution<br />

4,444 lbs RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

$7,999 ($49 yd 3 )<br />

10% (990 USG)<br />

1,835 lbs RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

$3,303 ($20 yd 3 )<br />

8,888 lbs RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

$15,988 ($98 yd 3 )<br />

15% (1,485 USG)<br />

917 lbs RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

$4,954 ($30 yd 3 )<br />

13,332 lbs RemOx <strong>EC</strong><br />

$23,998 ($147 yd 3 )<br />

• $1.80 / lb; Volume discounts not applied.<br />

• > 20% PV = NAPL mobilization issues


QUESTIONS?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!