26.11.2014 Views

Foraging and pollination behavior of Apis mellifera adansonii Latreille (Hymenoptera: Apidae) on Glycine max L. (Fabaceae) flowers at Maroua

To assess the impact of Apis mellifera adansonii on pod and seed yields of Glycine max, its foraging and pollinating activities were studied in Maroua, during the two season seasons (August-September 2010 and 2011). Observations were made on 51 to 17866 flowers per treatment. Treatment 1 represented by free flowers; treatment 2 bagged flowers and treatment 3 flowers visited only by A. m. adansonii. In addition, all flower visitors were recorded. The abundance of bee, duration of visits, impact of activity of A. m. adansonii on fruiting percentage, the influence of this bee on formation of pods, number of seeds in each pods and average of normal seeds (well developed) were recorded. Individuals from 28 species of insects were recorded on the flowers of G. max, after two years of observations. Apis mellifera adansonii with 23.18% of 954 visits was the most frequent, followed by Polyrachis sp. 1 (14.77%), Macronomia vulpina (14.22%), Lipotriches collaris (11.07%). This honey bee intensely and exclusively foraged for nectar. The mean foraging speed was 12.56 ± 5.79 flowers per minute. Flowers visited by insects had higher fruiting rate compared with the others while those bagged had the lowest. Apis mellifera adansonii foraging resulted to a significant increment in fruiting rate by 14.14 and 11.98%, as well as the number of seeds per pod by 36.95 and 35.65%, and the percentage of normal seeds by 32.61 and 29.26% respectively in 2010 and 2011. The installation of A. m. adansonii colonies in G. max plantations is recommended to improve pod and seeds production of this species.

To assess the impact of Apis mellifera adansonii on pod and seed yields of Glycine max, its foraging and pollinating activities were studied in Maroua, during the two season seasons (August-September 2010 and 2011). Observations were made on 51 to 17866 flowers per treatment. Treatment 1 represented by free flowers; treatment 2 bagged flowers and treatment 3 flowers visited only by A. m. adansonii. In addition, all flower visitors were recorded. The abundance of bee, duration of visits, impact of activity of A. m. adansonii on fruiting percentage, the influence of this bee on formation of pods, number of seeds in each pods and average of normal seeds (well developed) were recorded. Individuals from 28 species of insects were recorded on the flowers of G. max, after two years of observations. Apis mellifera adansonii with 23.18% of 954 visits was the most frequent, followed by Polyrachis sp. 1 (14.77%), Macronomia vulpina (14.22%), Lipotriches collaris (11.07%). This honey bee intensely and exclusively foraged for nectar. The mean foraging speed was 12.56 ± 5.79 flowers per minute. Flowers visited by insects had higher fruiting rate compared with the others while those bagged had the lowest. Apis mellifera adansonii foraging resulted to a significant increment in fruiting rate by 14.14 and 11.98%, as well as the number of seeds per pod by 36.95 and 35.65%, and the percentage of normal seeds by 32.61 and 29.26% respectively in 2010 and 2011. The installation of A. m. adansonii colonies in G. max plantations is recommended to improve pod and seeds production of this species.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fohouo <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Dounia, 2014<br />

Figure 3. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Apis</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>mellifera</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> collecting nectar in<br />

a flower <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Glycine</strong> <strong>max</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> was found to collect nectar intensively <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

exclusively (Figure 3).<br />

Rel<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>ship between visits <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> flowering stages<br />

Visits were most numerous when the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

open <strong>flowers</strong> was highest (Figure 4) Furthermore a<br />

positive <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> significant correl<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> was found between<br />

the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> G. <strong>max</strong> opened <strong>flowers</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the number<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> A. m. <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> visits in 2010, as well as 2011<br />

(r 2010 = 0.90; df = 8; p < 0.05; r 2011 = 0.85; df = 8; p <<br />

0.05). <str<strong>on</strong>g>Apis</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>mellifera</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> foraged <strong>on</strong> G. <strong>max</strong><br />

<strong>flowers</strong> throughout the blooming period, with a peak <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

activity situ<strong>at</strong>ed between 10 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11am (Figure 5).<br />

Dur<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> visits per flower<br />

In 2010 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2011, the mean dur<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> A. m.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> visit is 2.50 sec (n = 132; s = 1.34; <strong>max</strong>i = 6<br />

sec) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.61 sec (n = 91; s = 1.40; <strong>max</strong>i = 6 sec)<br />

respectively. The difference between the dur<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

visit in 2010 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2011 is higher significant (t = 22.25;<br />

df = 221, p < 0.001). For the two cumul<strong>at</strong>ed years‚ the<br />

mean dur<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a flower visit were 2.55 sec.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Foraging</str<strong>on</strong>g> speed <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Apis</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>mellifera</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Glycine</strong><br />

<strong>max</strong> <strong>flowers</strong><br />

On the pot <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> G. <strong>max</strong>, A. m. <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> visited<br />

between 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 24 <strong>flowers</strong>/min in 2010 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> between five<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 25 <strong>flowers</strong>/min in 2011. The mean foraging speed<br />

was 11.65 <strong>flowers</strong>/min (n = 50; s = 5.77) in 2010 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

13.48 <strong>flowers</strong>/min (n = 50; s = 5.82) in 2011. The<br />

difference between these means is highly significant (t =<br />

- 7.95; df = 98, p < 0.001). For the two cumul<strong>at</strong>ed years‚<br />

the mean foraging speed was 12.56 <strong>flowers</strong> /min.<br />

Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>on</strong> foraging activity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Apis</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>mellifera</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Glycine</strong> <strong>max</strong> <strong>flowers</strong><br />

Clim<strong>at</strong>ic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> seem not to influence the<br />

activity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> A. m. <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g>. T he correl<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> was<br />

neg<strong>at</strong>ive <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> not significant (r 2010 = - 0.34; df = 11; p<br />

> 0.05 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> r 2011 = 0.28; df = 11; p > 0.05) between the<br />

number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> A. m. <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> visits <strong>on</strong> G. <strong>max</strong> <strong>flowers</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the temper<strong>at</strong>ure. It was positive <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> not significant<br />

(r 2010 = 0.48; df = 11; p > 0.05 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> r 2011 = 0.07; df = 11;<br />

p > 0.05) between the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> A. m. <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> visits<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rel<strong>at</strong>ive humidity (Figure 6).<br />

Impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> anthophilous insects <strong>on</strong> pod form<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

seed yields <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Glycine</strong> <strong>max</strong><br />

During nectar harvest <strong>on</strong> G. <strong>max</strong>, foraging<br />

insects always shook <strong>flowers</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> are regularly in c<strong>on</strong>tact<br />

Figure 4: Vari<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>flowers</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> visits <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Apis</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>mellifera</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the<br />

<strong>flowers</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Glycine</strong> <strong>max</strong> in 2010 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2011.<br />

Figure 5. Vari<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>flowers</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> visits <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Apis</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>mellifera</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>adans<strong>on</strong>ii</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the <strong>flowers</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Glycine</strong><br />

<strong>max</strong> according to daily time in 2010, 2011.<br />

Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Research in Biology (2014) 4(1): 1209-1219 1213

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!