Views
3 years ago

The CLEAN-UP Act (H.R. 834) - Drug Policy Alliance

The CLEAN-UP Act (H.R. 834) - Drug Policy Alliance

12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 amphetamine or the proximity of the children to associated contaminated matter. ‘‘(B) The term ‘associated contaminated matter’, with respect to the process of manufacturing methamphetamine, means food, water, air, soil, equipment, or other matter that is contaminated with methamphetamine or other harmful substances as a result of the proximity of the matter to such process. ‘‘(d) FUNDING.— ‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— For the purpose of carrying out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2005. ‘‘(2) ALLOCATION FOR CHILDREN.—Of the amount appropriated under paragraph (1) for a fiscal year, not less than $2,500,000 shall be reserved for carrying out this section with respect to children.’’. TITLE III—ENFORCEMENT SEC. 301. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS RELATING TO METHAMPHETAMINE LABORATORY SEI- ZURE STATISTICS. In addition to any other funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2005 for the collection, aggrega- •HR 834 IH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 13 tion, and dissemination of methamphetamine laboratory seizure statistics by the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC) of the Department of Justice, there is authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 for such purpose. SEC. 302. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS RELATING TO COPS GRANTS. (a) IN GENERAL.—In addition to any other funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2005 for grants under part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd et seq.), known as the COPS program, there is authorized to be appropriated $20,000,000 for such purpose to provide training to State and local prosecutors and law enforcement agents for prosecution of methamphetamine offenses. (b) RURAL SET-ASIDE.—Of amounts made available pursuant to subsection (a), $5,000,000 shall be available only for prosecutors and law enforcement agents for rural communities. (c) DEA REIMBURSEMENT.—Of amounts made available pursuant to subsection (a), $2,000,000 shall be available only to reimburse the Drug Enforcement Administration for existing training expenses. •HR 834 IH

A Four Pillars Approach to Methamphetamine - Drug Policy Alliance
Improving Lives, Delivering Results - Drug Policy Alliance
Safety First A Reality-Based Approach To Teens - Drug Policy Alliance
Community Based Opioid Overdose Prevention - Drug Policy Alliance
Where Should You Be on March 19, 2011? - Drug Policy Alliance
Drug Policy and Health In Uzbekistan - Drug Policy Alliance
Drug Policy And Health In Romania - Drug Policy Alliance
Drug Policy and Health In Turkmenistan - Drug Policy Alliance
Medical Marijuana - Drug Policy Alliance
PDF View the executive summary. - Drug Policy Alliance
Q&A Drugs 2002: A Guide to Dutch Policy - Drug Policy Alliance
An Exit Strategy for the Failed War on Drugs - Drug Policy Alliance
Fact Sheet: Women, Prison, and the Drug War - Drug Policy Alliance
United States v. Randall - Drug Policy Alliance
Drug Policy and Health In Slovenia - Drug Policy Alliance
New Jersey Bail Reform Act - Drug Policy Alliance
PDF nymmj_levinetest.pdf - Drug Policy Alliance
Abusing the User - Drug Policy Alliance
What is Marijuana - Drug Policy Alliance
The Drug War Across Borders - Drug Policy Alliance
how accurate are positive sweat patch - Drug Policy Alliance
An Open Letter to Congress - Drug Policy Alliance
Cocaine and Pregnancy - Research Brief - Drug Policy Alliance
Family Health: Treatment and Education - Drug Policy Alliance
Ayahuasca: Healing Vine of the Soul - Drug Policy Alliance
PDF Marijuana and Health - Drug Policy Alliance
Is Cannabis a Stepping Stone for Cocaine? - Drug Policy Alliance
Supreme Court of the United States - Drug Policy Alliance
Healing a Broken System - Drug Policy Alliance
new york state assembly - Drug Policy Alliance