28.11.2014 Views

Introduction to Japanese Society and Politics - Sophia University ...

Introduction to Japanese Society and Politics - Sophia University ...

Introduction to Japanese Society and Politics - Sophia University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Aspects of <strong>Japanese</strong> <strong>Society</strong> I (AIKOM Program)/ 公 共 政 策 (Winter 2011)<br />

Tuesdays 13:00-14:30<br />

Instruc<strong>to</strong>r: Rieko Kage<br />

e-mail: kage@waka.c.u-<strong>to</strong>kyo.ac.jp<br />

Office hours: by appointment<br />

Course Description<br />

This course addresses major political <strong>and</strong> social issues in contemporary Japan.<br />

Students will be exposed <strong>to</strong> the main academic <strong>and</strong> policy debates over such issues as:<br />

inequality; fertility <strong>and</strong> aging; immigration; civil society; the fall of the LDP; <strong>and</strong> the<br />

March 11 th disaster.<br />

Requirements<br />

The class will be run as a seminar <strong>and</strong> students are expected <strong>to</strong> participate actively in<br />

class discussion. Students are expected <strong>to</strong> have read the readings for the week prior <strong>to</strong><br />

each class meeting. Every week, one student will be responsible for summarizing the<br />

week’s readings <strong>and</strong> for raising issues for discussion. Students should pay particular<br />

attention <strong>to</strong> where the different authors for the week agree <strong>and</strong>/or disagree with each<br />

other, <strong>and</strong> for what reasons. Students are also expected <strong>to</strong> write a final paper on one of<br />

the <strong>to</strong>pics covered during the course of the semester (inequality, low fertility, disaster<br />

recovery, civil society, <strong>and</strong> the fall of the LDP from power). Details on the paper are<br />

below.<br />

Evaluation<br />

Evaluation for the course will consist of attendance (20%), class participation (50%),<br />

<strong>and</strong> final paper (30%).<br />

Schedule<br />

Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 11 th<br />

Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 18 th:<br />

<strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>and</strong> Overview<br />

Inequality in Japan<br />

Toshiaki Tachibanaki (2006), “Inequality <strong>and</strong> Poverty in Japan,” <strong>Japanese</strong> Economic<br />

Review, vol. 57, no. 1: 1-27.<br />

Fumio Ohtake (2006), “Straight Thinking about the Income Gap,” Japan Echo, vol. 33,<br />

no. 3.<br />

Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 25 th :<br />

Inequality in Japan, continued<br />

Shogo Takekawa (2010), “Liberal Preferences <strong>and</strong> Conservative Policies: The<br />

Puzzling Size of Japan’s Welfare State,” Social Science Japan Journal, vol. 13, no.1:<br />

53-67.<br />

Kazuo Koike (2009), “The Myth of Seniority Wages,” Japan Echo, vol. 36, no. 5.


2<br />

Torbern Iversen <strong>and</strong> Anne Wren (1998), “Equality, Employment, <strong>and</strong> Budgetary<br />

Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy,” World <strong>Politics</strong>, vol. 50, no. 4:<br />

507-546.<br />

November 1 st : Low Fertility<br />

Sawako Shirahase (2007), “Women’s Economic Status <strong>and</strong> Fertility: Japan in<br />

Cross-National Perspective,” in Frances M. Rosenbluth, ed., The Political Economy of<br />

Japan’s Low Fertility. Stanford: Stanford <strong>University</strong> Press, ch. 2.<br />

Sawako Shirahase (2009), “Marriage as an Association of Social Classes in a Low<br />

Fertility-Rate <strong>Society</strong>,” in Hiroshi Ishida <strong>and</strong> David H. Slater, Social Class in<br />

Contemporary Japan: Structure, Sorting, <strong>and</strong> Strategies. New York: Routledge.<br />

November 8 th :<br />

Low Fertility <strong>and</strong> Aging in Comparative Context<br />

Julia Lynch (2006), Age in the Welfare State: The Origins of Social Spending on<br />

Pensioners, Workers, <strong>and</strong> Children. Cambridge: Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, ch. 1<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

November 15 th :<br />

The <strong>Japanese</strong> Youth<br />

Yuji Genda (2007), “Jobless Youths <strong>and</strong> the NEET Problem in Japan,” Social Science<br />

Japan Journal, vol. 10, no. 1: 23-40.<br />

Yuki Honda (2008), “Focusing in on Japan’s ‘Youth Nationalism’,” Social Science<br />

Japan Journal, vol. 10, no. 2: 281-286.<br />

Mary C. Brin<strong>to</strong>n (2009), “Social Class <strong>and</strong> Economic Life Chances in Post-Industrial<br />

Japan: The ‘Lost Generation,’” in Hiroshi Ishida <strong>and</strong> David H. Slater, Social Class in<br />

Contemporary Japan: Structure, Sorting, <strong>and</strong> Strategies. New York: Routledge.<br />

November 22 nd : Immigration<br />

Myungsoo Kim (2003), “Ethnic Stratification <strong>and</strong> Inter-Generational Differences in<br />

Japan: A Comparative Study of Korean <strong>and</strong> <strong>Japanese</strong> Status Attainment,”<br />

International Journal of <strong>Japanese</strong> Sociology, vol. 12, no. 1: 1-11.<br />

Seung-mi Han (2004), “From the Communitarian Ideal <strong>to</strong> the Public Sphere: The<br />

making of Foreigners’ Assemblies in Kawasaki City <strong>and</strong> Kanagawa Prefecture,” Social<br />

Science Japan Journal, vol. 7, no. 1: 41-60.<br />

Bumsoo Kim (2011), “Changes in the Socio-Economic Position of Zainichi Koreans:<br />

An His<strong>to</strong>rical Overview,” Social Science Japan Journal, vol. 14, no. 2: 233-245.<br />

November 29 th :<br />

Civil <strong>Society</strong>


3<br />

Mako<strong>to</strong> Iokibe (1999), “Japan’s Civil <strong>Society</strong>: A His<strong>to</strong>rical Overview,” in Tadashi<br />

Yamamo<strong>to</strong>, ed., Deciding the Public Good: Governance <strong>and</strong> Civil <strong>Society</strong> in Japan.<br />

Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange: 51-96.<br />

Yuko Kawa<strong>to</strong>, Robert Pekkanen, <strong>and</strong> Hidehiro Yamamo<strong>to</strong> (2010), “State <strong>and</strong> Civil<br />

<strong>Society</strong> in Japan,” in Alisa Gaunder, ed., Routledge H<strong>and</strong>book of <strong>Japanese</strong> <strong>Politics</strong>.<br />

New York: Routledge.<br />

Susan Pharr (2003), “Conclusion: Targeting by an Activist State: Japan as a Civil<br />

<strong>Society</strong> Model,” in Frank J. Schwartz <strong>and</strong> Susan J. Pharr, eds., The State of Civil <strong>Society</strong><br />

in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />

December 6 th : Civil <strong>Society</strong> (continued)<br />

Steven K. Vogel (1999), “When Interests Are Not Preferences: The Cautionary Tale of<br />

<strong>Japanese</strong> Consumers.” Comparative <strong>Politics</strong> vol. 31, no. 2: 187-207.<br />

Kim Reimann (2003), “Building Civil <strong>Society</strong> from the Outside In? <strong>Japanese</strong><br />

International Development NGOs, the State, <strong>and</strong> International Norms,” in Frank J.<br />

Schwartz <strong>and</strong> Susan J. Pharr, eds., The State of Civil <strong>Society</strong> in Japan. Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />

Mary Alice Haddad (2007), “The Transformation of Japan’s Civil <strong>Society</strong> L<strong>and</strong>scape,”<br />

Journal of East Asian Studies, vol. 7, no. 3: 413-437.<br />

December 13 th : The Fall of the LDP<br />

Chris<strong>to</strong>pher Hood (2010), “The Shinkansen’s Local Impact,” Social Science Japan<br />

Journal, forthcoming.<br />

Ellis S. Krauss <strong>and</strong> Robert Pekkanen (2010), “The Rise <strong>and</strong> Fall of Japan’s Liberal<br />

Democratic Party,” Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 69, no. 1: 5-15.<br />

Masaki Taniguchi, Hideaki Uenohara, <strong>and</strong> Shiro Sakaiya (2010), “Who Ended the<br />

LDP’s Reign?” Japan Echo, vol. 37, no. 1.<br />

December 20 th : Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the Disaster (1)<br />

Stephanie E. Chang (2010), “Urban Disaster Recovery: A Measurement Framework<br />

<strong>and</strong> its Application <strong>to</strong> the 1995 Kobe Earthquake,” Disasters, vol. 34, no. 2: 303-327.<br />

Daniel P. Aldrich (2011), “Social, not Physical, Infrastructure: The Critical Role of<br />

Civil <strong>Society</strong> after the 1923 Tokyo Earthquake,” Disasters, forthcoming.<br />

January 17 th : Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the Disaster (2)


4<br />

Richard J. Samuels (1987), The Business of the <strong>Japanese</strong> State: Energy Markets in<br />

Comparative <strong>and</strong> His<strong>to</strong>rical Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell <strong>University</strong> Press,<br />

Daniel P. Aldrich (2007), Site Fights: Divisive Facilities <strong>and</strong> Civil <strong>Society</strong> in Japan<br />

<strong>and</strong> the West. Ithaca: Cornell <strong>University</strong> Press, ch. 5: 119-151.<br />

Jacques E. C. Hymans (2011), “Ve<strong>to</strong> Players, Nuclear Energy, <strong>and</strong> Nonproliferation:<br />

Domestic Institutional Barriers <strong>to</strong> a <strong>Japanese</strong> Nuclear Bomb,” International Security,<br />

vol. 36, no. 2: 154-189.<br />

January 24 th<br />

Wrap-up<br />

Presentations:<br />

Student presentations should be 20-30 minutes in length. Students should prepare a<br />

1-2 page h<strong>and</strong>out for the class that summarizes the argument <strong>and</strong> the main points in the<br />

reading(s). In addition <strong>to</strong> summarizing the argument <strong>and</strong> the main points in the<br />

readings, the student should offer a critique of the argument advanced in the article.<br />

Do you find the argument convincing? Why or why not? To what extent does the<br />

evidence offered by the author support the argument advanced in the paper? Any<br />

additional insights from other courses, readings, anything that you know on the <strong>to</strong>pic<br />

from elsewhere are also welcome.<br />

Paper<br />

The paper should address one of the major <strong>to</strong>pics covered in the course. It should ask:<br />

on what issues do the authors covered in the course agree or disagree with each other?<br />

Which argument do you find the most convincing, <strong>and</strong> why? The paper should be 4-5<br />

pages in length (A4, double-spaced, 11 or 12 point font). You are also welcome <strong>to</strong><br />

conduct your own research on the subject or <strong>to</strong> discuss additional material that you have<br />

read in other courses or on your own. Please e-mail the paper <strong>to</strong> the instruc<strong>to</strong>r at<br />

kage@waka.c.u-<strong>to</strong>kyo.ac.jp by February 8 th , 2012, end of the day (no extensions).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!