29.11.2014 Views

THE NAVAL ENGINEER

THE NAVAL ENGINEER

THE NAVAL ENGINEER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Close Shave?<br />

By Paul Lloyd MBE FInstLM GCGI LCGI MCMI<br />

Electric Propulsion Systems<br />

Paul, aka Jeff, joined the Electric Propulsion Systems team in March 2009 following 33<br />

years in the RN, attaining the rank of WO1WEA(ADC).<br />

He joined the Navy as an Artificer Apprentice in 1975 at HMS Fisgard and was streamed<br />

as an REA. Sea training was undertaken in HMS Brighton before returning to Collingwood<br />

whereupon branch changes saw him complete the apprenticeship as a WEA (AD/CEW).<br />

Interspersed with SFM Devonport, where there was the opportunity to work on a broad<br />

range of WE equipment, two sea jobs as a section maintainer were undertaken in HMS<br />

Phoebe, Seacat radar and guidance, and HMS Charybdis, Seawolf surveillance radar.<br />

This was followed by loan service with the St Vincent and the Grenadines Coastguard with<br />

responsibility for anything electrical or electronic fitted to their four patrol boats. On return to<br />

the UK he undertook CCWEA QC and then at short notice<br />

joined HMS Coventry. Then it was back to SFM where time<br />

in the Seawolf Assistance Team was interrupted by a short<br />

foreign trip to serve with the United Nations Transitional<br />

Authority Cambodia. HMS Chatham followed and during this<br />

draft he was made an MBE. Advanced to WO1 where jobs as<br />

ASWEO F2, DCSA SO3 Customer Account Manager (Navy),<br />

FOST WESRI – foreign ships lead, MTE co-ordinator and<br />

finally back at SFM Devonport as FTSP Package Manager<br />

followed. He was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal in<br />

2007 just prior to leaving the RN in March 2008.<br />

Introduction<br />

In mid 2009 HMS Argyll reported<br />

damage to one of her propulsion<br />

motor commutators. This was<br />

caused by brushes wearing<br />

down beyond their minimum limit,<br />

resulting in the copper tails scoring<br />

the commutator segments. Both<br />

commutators were profiled by ESG<br />

staff to establish the shape and<br />

truth of running and the results<br />

showed that both were in a similar<br />

condition. A PUMA was conducted<br />

in HMS Lancaster and likewise<br />

the commutators were noticed to<br />

be visibly damaged. At this point it<br />

was decided that all of the Type 23<br />

commutators should be profiled<br />

and the remaining commutators<br />

were subsequently checked over a<br />

12-month period and all displayed<br />

varying levels of degradation.<br />

The problem<br />

The rough surface, seen in Figure 1,<br />

causes increased brush wear that<br />

consequently leads to an increased<br />

production of carbon dust. This<br />

conductive dust has subsequently<br />

coated many components within<br />

the motor; static field windings<br />

and rotating armature windings,<br />

busbars, brush<br />

gear, insulators<br />

and motor<br />

internal casing.<br />

There has been<br />

19<br />

a commensurate reduction of the<br />

motor’s insulation resistance (IR)<br />

and this could subsequently lead to<br />

a flashover (now more commonly<br />

referred to as “Arc Flash”) event<br />

within a motor. The lowest<br />

acceptable limit of IR in the motors<br />

is 1 Mohm. Low IRs were reported in<br />

several vessels and the lowest was<br />

an armature at 0.45 Mohm, reported<br />

by HMS Kent. She was emerging<br />

from upkeep and was initially<br />

directed to clean the brushgear<br />

and retake measurements. The IR<br />

increased marginally and, following<br />

a system split by disconnecting<br />

the motor’s busbar link plates, the<br />

low IR was determined to be within<br />

the motor’s armature windings/<br />

commutator risers. Ship’s Staff were<br />

subsequently directed to obtain<br />

specialist assistance to carry out a<br />

deep clean of the motor, to avoid the<br />

possibility of a flashover – Figure 2 1 .<br />

The main concern with a flashover<br />

is whether or not personnel could<br />

be injured by the event. A flashover<br />

was increasingly likely to occur if<br />

no action was taken to improve<br />

the condition of commutators<br />

and reduce the dust levels within<br />

the motors. Following two safety<br />

reviews, it was considered that the<br />

most likely area that a flashover<br />

would occur would be within the<br />

brushgear and that this may or may<br />

1. http://www.wmea.net/Technical%20<br />

Papers/Technical%20Developments%20<br />

in%20the%20Measurement%20of%20<br />

Commutator%20Profiles%20-%20Nov%20<br />

07.pdf, (accessed 18 December 2012).<br />

Figure 1: HMS Argyll profile before repair<br />

Figure 2: This is what we’re trying to avoid<br />

Jump to<br />

Contents

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!