30.11.2014 Views

26-Mar-10 - Hertfordshire County Council

26-Mar-10 - Hertfordshire County Council

26-Mar-10 - Hertfordshire County Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 Conclusions<br />

4.1 Members heard that when Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) grant<br />

planning permission for a development that includes new roads, they<br />

cannot impose planning conditions regarding the extent of highway<br />

adoption or the timing of the adoption process nor do they have any<br />

power to force a developer to put a road up for adoption. They were<br />

also concerned to hear that there are no incentives for developers to<br />

enter into Section 38 Agreements. As a result developers currently<br />

initiate the process by dictating when they enter into a Section 38<br />

adoption agreement. This agreement sets out the design and adoption<br />

time limits. New agreements include a bond for the entire cost of<br />

constructing the road which may be used by the Highway Authority to<br />

bring the road up to an adoptable standard should the developer<br />

default. Members also noted that in the current economic climate<br />

there is a risk that fewer Section 38 adoption agreements may be<br />

entered into because developers do not have resources to fund the<br />

bond. Members were also made aware that the Highway Authority<br />

may choose not to adopt a road where there are no highway benefits.<br />

(Recommendation 2.1)<br />

4.2 The Advance Payments Code (APC) within the Highways Act 1980<br />

secures payment of the expenses of completing the roadworks in unadopted<br />

roads next to new buildings. This makes sure that the street<br />

works authority can complete the road works if the developer fails to<br />

complete them. If work is started on a building before the appropriate<br />

sum has been paid or secured, the owner may have to pay a fine of up<br />

to £<strong>10</strong>00 per building. The Code was introduced to guard against the<br />

post-war problem of small speculative developers and offers no<br />

protection for the Highway Authority on today’s large developments<br />

where access roads may not have houses on the road and therefore<br />

not be covered by the Code or where there are many properties each<br />

of which has to be dealt with separately and strict time constraints<br />

which preclude this action.<br />

4.3 Members were advised that the APC is not implemented by <strong>Hertfordshire</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and has not been for at least 30 years. Some of the districts<br />

followed it when they had highway agency agreements as the necessary<br />

communication between planners, building control and highways was much<br />

easier in one organisation. Officers have recently sought legal advice on the<br />

position regarding the Code. The <strong>County</strong>’s Legal Services teams share<br />

highways officers’ view that this would be highly resource-intensive and give<br />

little protection against the problems currently besetting <strong>Hertfordshire</strong>. Benchmarking<br />

against other Highway Authorities show that those following the<br />

Code are in the minority and are mostly single-tier authorities where the<br />

necessary communication between planners and highway engineers is more<br />

easily achieved. Members also noted that building control is not always<br />

managed by local authorities, possibly resulting in HCC not being notified of<br />

outcomes.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!