01.12.2014 Views

NERC GADS Introduction to pc-GAR and pc-GAR MT - SERC Home ...

NERC GADS Introduction to pc-GAR and pc-GAR MT - SERC Home ...

NERC GADS Introduction to pc-GAR and pc-GAR MT - SERC Home ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>NERC</strong> <strong>GADS</strong> <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong><br />

Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 28. 2011


Data Sources<br />

Genera<strong>to</strong>r<br />

“B”<br />

Genera<strong>to</strong>r<br />

“C”<br />

Genera<strong>to</strong>r<br />

“D”<br />

Genera<strong>to</strong>r<br />

“A”<br />

<strong>GADS</strong><br />

Genera<strong>to</strong>r<br />

“E”<br />

280+ Genera<strong>to</strong>rs Reporting 5,900+ units,<br />

including international affiliates.<br />

2 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


What is <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong>?<br />

<strong>pc</strong>-G.A.R<br />

• Unique software<br />

product <strong>to</strong> allow access<br />

<strong>to</strong> the data collected in<br />

the <strong>GADS</strong> database.<br />

• It reports equipment<br />

outage information for<br />

the purpose of<br />

improving electric<br />

power output.<br />

3 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Why <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong>?<br />

• Introduced in 1992<br />

• Created <strong>to</strong>:<br />

• Reduce the number of special studies produced annually.<br />

• Allow users quick access <strong>to</strong> <strong>GADS</strong> information.<br />

• Increase the need <strong>to</strong> maintain good outage records.<br />

• Only one of it’s kind in the world!<br />

• WEC wants <strong>to</strong> follow this example<br />

4 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


With data mining, you take advantage<br />

of past experience …<br />

you learn from the past <strong>to</strong><br />

prepare for the future.<br />

5 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Unit Types Available (12 choices)<br />

• Fossil<br />

• Fluidized bed fossil<br />

• Nuclear<br />

• Gas Turbine<br />

• Jet Engine<br />

• Diesel<br />

• Hydro<br />

• Pumped S<strong>to</strong>rage<br />

• Combined Cycle<br />

• Geothermal<br />

• Co-genera<strong>to</strong>r<br />

• Multi-boiler/Multiturbine<br />

6 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Units Selections<br />

• All Including Own<br />

• All Except Own<br />

• Own Units<br />

• United States Only<br />

• Canada Only<br />

• 2 Regions required for analysis<br />

7 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Two Types of Variables<br />

• Class<br />

• “Yes” or “No” types<br />

• Super or sub-critical<br />

• General Electric or other<br />

manufacturer<br />

• Balanced or pressurized<br />

draft<br />

• Continuous<br />

• Range<br />

• MW size (1-1400 MW)<br />

• Steam Pressure (1-3600<br />

psig)<br />

• EAF (0-100%)<br />

8 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Three Groups of Criteria<br />

Selection<br />

• Physical (class)<br />

• Example: # of pumps<br />

• Performance (continuous)<br />

• Example: # of service hours<br />

• Statistics (continuous)<br />

• Example: EFOR<br />

9 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help with <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong><br />

10 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #1 – Selecting Fuels<br />

• Two fuel selections<br />

• “As designed” means what the unit was designed <strong>to</strong> burn.<br />

• “Actual fuel burned” means what did the unit actually burn<br />

in the specific year.<br />

• 100% of the “actual burned” fuels<br />

• 90% of the “designed fuels”<br />

11 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #1 – Selecting Fuels<br />

Actual Fuel Burned<br />

Design Fuel<br />

12 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #2 – Apply Criteria By…<br />

• You can apply the performance/fuel criteria by either<br />

year or range.<br />

• Year – tests the criteria on a year by year basis. A unit may<br />

pass the test one year but not the next. Only the one year<br />

where it passed will be in the survey.<br />

• Range – tests the criteria on the average for the period you<br />

selected. If you picked a 5-year period for an EAF > 85%,<br />

then the average EAF for the period is tested. If it fails, that<br />

unit will be removed from the survey.<br />

13 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #2 – Apply Criteria By…<br />

Accepted<br />

Accepted<br />

Rejected<br />

Accepted<br />

EAF = 90.40%<br />

EAF = 87.56%<br />

EAF = 84.55%<br />

EAF = 85.98%<br />

If criteria included<br />

EAF of 85% or<br />

greater, then 3 of<br />

4 years accepted using<br />

“Year” but<strong>to</strong>n.<br />

Accepted<br />

EAF = 86.91%<br />

If criteria included<br />

EAF of 85% or<br />

greater, then average EAF<br />

of 4 years accepted using<br />

“Range” but<strong>to</strong>n.<br />

14 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #3 – for Years/for Periods<br />

• Events <strong>and</strong> performance data are divided in<strong>to</strong> monthly<br />

intervals for retrieving <strong>and</strong> analyzing data by months,<br />

years, <strong>and</strong> multi-year periods.<br />

• When using less than one year, use:<br />

• “Annual/monthly Unit Summary Report” for viewing monthly<br />

numbers.<br />

• “Unit-year Statistical Report” for projections of how the unit<br />

would operate if operated in the same manner as the short<br />

period.<br />

15 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #3 – for Years/for Periods<br />

16 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #3 – for Years/for Periods<br />

Data pulled for months 01 <strong>to</strong> 12 for three years.<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Jan Feb …. Nov Dec Jan Feb …. Nov Dec Jan Feb …. Nov Dec<br />

Data pulled for months 11 <strong>to</strong> 02 for three years.<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Jan & Feb Nov <strong>to</strong> Feb Nov <strong>to</strong> Feb Nov Dec<br />

17 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #4 – Adding/removing Units<br />

• <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> allows you <strong>to</strong> add or remove youp own units<br />

from any selected group (“units included in report”)<br />

• You cannot remove units that <strong>NERC</strong> considers not<br />

yours (even if you are a part-owner.) “Ownership”<br />

(<strong>to</strong> <strong>NERC</strong>) is the organization reporting data <strong>to</strong> <strong>GADS</strong>.<br />

18 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #4 – Adding/removing Units<br />

All own units<br />

Own units in<br />

report.<br />

19 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #4 – Adding/removing Units<br />

First, select one unit<br />

at a time <strong>to</strong> move.<br />

Next, click on the<br />

But<strong>to</strong>n <strong>to</strong> add own<br />

units <strong>to</strong> report.<br />

20 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #4 – Adding/removing Units<br />

The unit is now<br />

added.<br />

21 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #4 – Adding/removing Units<br />

To remove a unit<br />

from the report,<br />

first highlight the<br />

unit then<br />

click on the<br />

“remove unit”<br />

bot<strong>to</strong>m.<br />

22 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #4 – Adding/removing Units<br />

The unit is now back<br />

in<strong>to</strong> the “own unit” list<br />

<strong>and</strong> out of the report.<br />

23 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #5 – Same Peer Group<br />

• This procedure allows you <strong>to</strong> use the same group of<br />

units from one period <strong>to</strong> the next, assuming the same<br />

units reported in both periods.<br />

• First, select the group of units using the st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

procedure for choosing a group.<br />

• Second, in “Menu of Reports,” choose “Report Data<br />

Range.”<br />

• Third, select a new period <strong>to</strong> analyze.<br />

24 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #5 – Same Peer Group<br />

Some criteria may<br />

change from one<br />

period <strong>to</strong> the next<br />

as shown here.<br />

Select criteria <strong>and</strong><br />

then save.<br />

25 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #5 – Same Peer Group<br />

Select a new<br />

period here.<br />

26 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #5 – Same Peer Group<br />

Here you<br />

select a new<br />

period for<br />

analysis using<br />

the same<br />

group of units.<br />

27 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #6 – Single, Own Unit Report<br />

• For when you want <strong>to</strong> create a <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> report for<br />

just one of your own units.<br />

• Normal selection procedure for own units.<br />

• Remove all but the single unit from the “Units<br />

included<br />

in Report” section.<br />

• Apply criteria as “Reapply Criteria …”<br />

28 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #6 – Single, Own Unit Report<br />

Choose “Own Units”<br />

<strong>to</strong> remove any units<br />

not under your<br />

control.<br />

29 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #6 – Single, Own Unit Report<br />

Select the unit(s) you<br />

wanted <strong>to</strong> analyze. You<br />

can pick more than one<br />

if you want for a single<br />

group or show the<br />

performance of a plant.<br />

Suppose we want <strong>to</strong><br />

see the performance of<br />

3 units.<br />

30 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #6 – Single, Own Unit Report<br />

After removing all<br />

but the 3 units using<br />

the “remove unit”<br />

but<strong>to</strong>n, you return <strong>to</strong><br />

the “Report Design”<br />

section of the<br />

Criteria Entry.<br />

31 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #6 – Single, Own Unit Report<br />

Apply the Criteria.<br />

32 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #6 – Single, Own Unit Report<br />

Choose the “event option” you want (see Help #7<br />

for details) <strong>and</strong> click “ok”.<br />

33 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #6 – Single, Own Unit Report<br />

Select “Re-apply Criteria …” option <strong>to</strong> pull data for just the 3 units.<br />

If you use the other option, you’ll be back where you started with<br />

all of your own units.<br />

34 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #6 – Single, Own Unit Report<br />

Now you have only<br />

3 units for your<br />

report.<br />

Save the file.<br />

Print the report as<br />

you normally do.<br />

35 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #7 – Data Making Statistics<br />

• There are three options for choosing the units<br />

<strong>and</strong> data for making the statistics in the<br />

reports:<br />

• Units that report both event & performance records <strong>and</strong><br />

units reporting performance data only.<br />

• Units that report both event <strong>and</strong> performance data only.<br />

• Units that report both event <strong>and</strong> performance data for all<br />

years of the period.<br />

36 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #7 – Data Making Statistics<br />

This option includes all units reporting <strong>to</strong> <strong>GADS</strong>, whether<br />

they reported events data or not.<br />

This option may show differences in statistics like EAF, EFOR,<br />

EFORd, etc because not all units reported deratings.<br />

37 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #7 – Data Making Statistics<br />

This option includes all units reporting <strong>to</strong> <strong>GADS</strong> where<br />

events are reported during the period being examined.<br />

This option will show accurate statistics like EAF, EFOR,<br />

EFORd, etc because all units report deratings.<br />

38 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #7 – Data Making Statistics<br />

This option includes all units reporting <strong>to</strong> <strong>GADS</strong> where events were<br />

reported during the complete period being examined. If you were<br />

examining 5 years, the unit would have <strong>to</strong> report events all 5 years.<br />

This option will show accurate statistics like EAF, EFOR, EFORd, etc.<br />

because all units reported deratings.<br />

39 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #8 – Start Fresh or<br />

Re-examine?<br />

• When retrieving data, you have the option <strong>to</strong> start<br />

fresh each time or re-examine the existing data.<br />

• It is faster <strong>to</strong> start with a big group, add a criteria,<br />

<strong>and</strong> then re-examine the group as each criteria is<br />

added.<br />

40 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #8 – Start Fresh or<br />

Re-examine?<br />

Always uses this option when starting a new retrieval or<br />

increasing the population of an existing retrieval.<br />

41 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #8 – Start Fresh or<br />

Re-examine?<br />

Use this option if you are “trimming” an existing retrieval. Never<br />

use it if you suspect that the population of the retrieval will increase.<br />

42 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #9 – Inclusion<br />

• In <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong>, the software assume you want everything<br />

unless you specify that you only want something<br />

special.<br />

• For example, the program will assume you want all<br />

<strong>NERC</strong> Regions unless you specify you only want two<br />

certain Regions.<br />

43 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #10 – Exclusion<br />

• In <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong>, you may have <strong>to</strong> specify you DON’T WANT<br />

something in order <strong>to</strong> get the condition you really<br />

want.<br />

• For example, if you wanted units with a single<br />

reheater in the boiler, you would have <strong>to</strong> specify that<br />

the first RH section is 1 <strong>to</strong> 9999 psig <strong>and</strong> the second<br />

RH section is 0 <strong>to</strong> 0 psig.<br />

44 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Help #10 – Exclusion<br />

By placing a “0” (zero) in some criteria, you can focus on special<br />

cases of design. Here we locate single RH units <strong>and</strong> remove non<strong>and</strong><br />

double RH.<br />

45 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Question & Answer<br />

On <strong>to</strong> the demo…<br />

46 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Examples<br />

47 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Class Example 100-300 MW<br />

Oil Unit<br />

• Example for locating your unit for comparing <strong>to</strong><br />

others<br />

• AF <strong>and</strong> EAF distributions<br />

• Suppose that your unit is between 100-300 MW <strong>and</strong><br />

burns oil as its primary fuel. How would you locate<br />

other units in <strong>GADS</strong> <strong>and</strong> compare yourself <strong>to</strong> them?<br />

48 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Class Example 100-300 MW<br />

Oil Unit<br />

STEP<br />

1. Double Click on <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> icon<br />

2. Click on “New Report Wizard”<br />

3. Input Study Description<br />

4. Input Author<br />

5. Click on pull down menu for “Unit Type”<br />

6. Click on desired Unit Type (fossil-steam)<br />

7. Click on pull down menu for “Units”<br />

8. Click on “All Units Including Own”<br />

9. Click on “Next”<br />

10. Enter “1993” through “1997” in “Years” window<br />

49 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Class Example 100-300 MW<br />

Oil Unit<br />

STEP<br />

11. Click on “Add a Criteria” But<strong>to</strong>n<br />

12. Select Window for 1 st Criteria Category<br />

(Physical, Performance or All)<br />

13. Enter Select Criteria<br />

14. Click on “Add a Criteria But<strong>to</strong>n”<br />

15. Select Window for 2 nd Criteria Category<br />

16. Enter Select Criteria<br />

17. Click on “Apply Criteria”<br />

18. Click on “OK”<br />

19. Note number of Units Selected<br />

20. Click on “Next”<br />

50 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Class Example 100-300 MW<br />

Oil Unit<br />

STEP<br />

21. Click on “Next”<br />

22. Click on “Save” (after adding Title 1,2 or comments if desired)<br />

23. Highlight desired study<br />

24. Click on “Print Report”<br />

25. Click on “Unit Statistics Distributions”<br />

26. Check AF & EAF<br />

27. Click on “OK”<br />

28. Check “Print Unit Names on Cover Page”<br />

29. Check on “Print”<br />

30. Observe Page 1 of report results<br />

51 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Class Example 100-300 MW<br />

Oil Unit<br />

STEP<br />

31. Click on Page “down”<br />

32. Observe statistics for mean & median values for AF & Distributions<br />

33. Write down 10 th , 25 th , 75 th <strong>and</strong> 90 th percentiles <strong>and</strong> Mean & Median<br />

values of AF<br />

34. Repeat steps 31-33 for EAF<br />

35. If you have time, try another technology (Hydro, GT, CC, or another type<br />

fossil steam on your own<br />

52 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Question & Answer<br />

53 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


What is <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong>?<br />

54 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


What is <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong>?<br />

• Software product <strong>to</strong> provide a distribution of times <strong>to</strong><br />

repair (TTR) <strong>and</strong> times between failures (TBF)<br />

• Software product <strong>to</strong> provide Mean TTR <strong>and</strong> Mean<br />

TBF for modeling <strong>and</strong> analysis programs<br />

• Software product that allows YOU control of the units<br />

in the data set.<br />

55 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Events as Reported <strong>to</strong> <strong>GADS</strong><br />

• Most events are shown as one, continuous activity<br />

per year<br />

• However, there are some where the single event is<br />

divided in<strong>to</strong> parts by:<br />

• Months for internal utility reporting<br />

• Years as part of the <strong>GADS</strong> cut off<br />

56 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Need for New Software<br />

• Combine monthly events in<strong>to</strong> one<br />

• Combine year-ending & year starting events in<strong>to</strong> one<br />

• Ability <strong>to</strong> isolate events by event types<br />

• Ability <strong>to</strong> isolate events by cause codes or groups of<br />

cause codes<br />

57 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


The <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong> Plan<br />

Year 1 Year 2<br />

Year 2<br />

Event 1 Event 1 Event 1<br />

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3<br />

Event 1<br />

Goal: one event, no matter its start or end!<br />

58 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


The Programming<br />

<strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong><br />

New Data H<strong>and</strong>ling<br />

Software<br />

<strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong><br />

59 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Why <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong>?<br />

• Determine more accurately the times between<br />

failures for modeling<br />

• Determine more accurately the repair times for<br />

shorter down time<br />

• Manage inspections <strong>to</strong> equipment <strong>to</strong> prevent forced<br />

outages<br />

• Evaluate operating/maintenance practices<br />

60 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


What’s in common<br />

between <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong>s?<br />

• Same design retrievals<br />

• Same performance retrievals<br />

• Same ability <strong>to</strong> use range or year option<br />

• Same years of resource<br />

• Same wizard for selecting units<br />

• Different output reports<br />

61 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


What’s in common<br />

between <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong>s?<br />

Design data Event/Performance Data Fuel Data<br />

Retrieval Criteria<br />

<strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong><br />

<strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong><br />

62 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


<strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong> Main Screen<br />

Once the criteria<br />

is chosen, you<br />

start the <strong>MT</strong><br />

retrieval with this<br />

but<strong>to</strong>n.<br />

63 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


<strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong> Cause Code Selection<br />

64 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


<strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong> Event Type Selection<br />

65 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


<strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong> Output<br />

Example of <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong> output. Lots of information!<br />

66 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


FD or ID Fan Problems<br />

• Fossil units, 400-499 MW during 1993-1997<br />

• Problems with more than 1 hour of full forced outage.<br />

• 24 out of 146 events were less than 1 hour!<br />

67 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Question & Answer<br />

Contact:<br />

Mike Curley<br />

Manager of <strong>GADS</strong> Services<br />

mike.curley@nerc.net<br />

801.756.0972<br />

68 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Versions of <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong><br />

• <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong><br />

• Annual update normally in the fall of the next year<br />

• 14 month subscription<br />

• <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong>+Plus<br />

• Monthly update with all new data passing the <strong>GADS</strong> edit<br />

programs<br />

• 12 months subscription<br />

• <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong> <strong>MT</strong><br />

• Annual update normally in the fall of the next year<br />

• 14 month subscription<br />

69 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY


Versions of <strong>pc</strong>-<strong>GAR</strong><br />

• Power Genera<strong>to</strong>r Version<br />

• Assess <strong>to</strong> manufacturer-specific data<br />

• Assess <strong>to</strong> own unit data<br />

• Manufacturer’s Version<br />

• Assess <strong>to</strong> own manufacturer equipment <strong>and</strong> units<br />

• All competi<strong>to</strong>rs are grouped as own manufacturer<br />

• All others<br />

• No assess <strong>to</strong> manufacturer or unit-specific data<br />

• Rule: 3 utilities <strong>and</strong> 7 units for any reports<br />

70 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!