01.12.2014 Views

Baw Baw Shire Council, VIC - Local Government Managers Australia

Baw Baw Shire Council, VIC - Local Government Managers Australia

Baw Baw Shire Council, VIC - Local Government Managers Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

strengthen<br />

engaged<br />

communities<br />

together<br />

Information, opinions and statements in<br />

this report can be attributed only to the<br />

team members (listed below) and may<br />

not represent the views of the <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong><br />

<strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> Blokes LGMA team hereby<br />

give permission to LGMA National to use<br />

the information in this report as required.<br />

baw baw shire council lgma management challenge<br />

The <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> Blokes - Cameron Gray, Matthew Driessen, Robert Barr, Sasee Manodeepan and Garry Websdale


section one - understanding the baw baw community<br />

a) about baw baw shire<br />

<strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> is approximately 100 kilometres east of Melbourne in the heart of West Gippsland. It has an area of<br />

4,027 square kilometres and was formed in 1994 from the amalgamation of the former Buln Buln and Narracan<br />

<strong>Shire</strong>s, the Rural City of Warragul (previously the <strong>Shire</strong> of Warragul), and some parts of the <strong>Shire</strong> of Upper Yarra.<br />

The northern half of the shire is heavily forested and lies in the Great Dividing Range and its foothills, including parts<br />

of the Mt <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> National Park, while the shire is bounded by the Strzelecki Range and its foothills to the south. The<br />

„middle‟ part of the shire is more densely populated, particularly in areas close to the Princes Highway and the<br />

Gippsland railway line, but still retains its rural environment. <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> is bordered by South Gippsland, Cardinia, Yarra<br />

Ranges, Mansfield <strong>Shire</strong>, Wellington <strong>Shire</strong>, and Latrobe City.<br />

As the suburbs situated along the periphery of Melbourne have become more densely populated, the population in the<br />

towns of Warragul and Drouin are rising steeply. From 2006 to 2011, <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>'s population increased by 5,688<br />

people (15.3%). This represents an average annual population change of 2.89% per year over the period.<br />

Analysis of the demographic age groups of <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> in 2011 is similar when compared to Regional Victoria.<br />

Overall, 24.5% of the population was aged between 0 and 17, and 23.5% were aged 60 years and over, compared<br />

with 23.5% and 24.2% respectively for Regional Victoria.<br />

b) snapshots of baw baw shire<br />

population In 2011 was 44,042<br />

genders<br />

49% men and 51% women<br />

39 years (<strong>Australia</strong>: 37)<br />

median age<br />

Over 55 ~ 27.5%<br />

indigenous 0.9% (<strong>Australia</strong>: 2.3%)<br />

9.8% (<strong>Australia</strong>: 22.2%)<br />

born overseas<br />

Majority from UK, NZ and Europe<br />

Table 1: Snapshot statistical profile of <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong><br />

<strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> is largely rural in nature, and is<br />

currently experiencing unprecedented residential<br />

expansion. The larger towns of Warragul (12,943),<br />

Drouin (7,523) and Trafalgar (2,684) sit alongside<br />

a handful of smaller towns with populations<br />

ranging from 597 to 1,600 and a sprinkling of<br />

smaller communities with a population below 500.<br />

2009/10 <strong>Australia</strong>n Bureau of Statistic (ABS) data<br />

indicates that <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> was the sixth (6th)<br />

fastest growing LGA in Victoria.<br />

The projected population of <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> is expected to increase by 31.8% from the period 2011 to 2026 (as projected by<br />

DPCP - Victorian In Future). Below is the estimated population growth of residents in <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>. 1<br />

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 Number Percentage<br />

Population 44,042 49,174 54,439 59,578 64,608 20,566 31.83<br />

The projected age structure sees a decline in persons 0 – 59 years generally (with the exception of the 25 – 34 year<br />

age group which is expected in increase slightly), and an increase in persons 60 years +. The largest increase is<br />

anticipated in the 70 – 84 year age group which is expected to increase by 1.95% during this period.<br />

In 2011, <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> had a higher median weekly household income than both Latrobe City and the Gippsland<br />

Region, however lower than the Victorian median. On average, individuals in <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> receive $38 per week more<br />

than individuals in the Gippsland region, and $50 less than the state average.<br />

In 2011, a higher proportion of <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> residents aged between 15 and 64 years were working full time compared to<br />

Latrobe and Gippsland residents of this age. <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> had a lower proportion of people in this age group working full<br />

1 Central West Gippsland Primary Care Partnership


time compared to Victoria as a whole. <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> had as many residents not in the labour force as were working full<br />

time, whilst the number of people not in the labour force was 1.2 times those employed full time in Latrobe LGA. .<br />

According to ABS 2011 Census data, the three industries with the highest proportion of population employed in <strong>Baw</strong><br />

<strong>Baw</strong> were: Health Care and Social Support, Construction and Retail. In 2011, <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> had a significantly higher<br />

proportion of the population working in agriculture, than Latrobe and Victoria as a whole. This was also true of<br />

Gippsland as a whole. <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> had 4 times the percentage of population working in agriculture, forestry and fishing<br />

compared to Latrobe and Victoria as a whole. 91% of homes in <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> have access to the internet,<br />

which is higher than the Victorian average.<br />

c) key shifts and changes in baw baw shire<br />

<strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> is currently experiencing a period of significant population growth which is expected to continue into<br />

the future. By 2026 there may be an additional 16,000 people living in the shire, and if this rate of growth<br />

continues, by 2050 there could be double our current population living in the municipality. The urbanisation<br />

puts pressure on the residents to pay more in rates and charges in order to keep up with the infrastructure<br />

needs of the community. Increase in developments increases pressure on the roads, drainage and<br />

environment which increases the need for maintenance.<br />

The aging profile of <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> is resulting in increasing demand for services for the aged and access to<br />

services is becoming a significant issue for older residents in smaller townships and communities. <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong>‟s<br />

older population are increasingly socially isolated and there is a greater need on building connections for the<br />

community. In <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> younger adults tend to leave the region for education and employment opportunities<br />

in the city and don‟t often return.<br />

The average household size is declining with more households without children and single person<br />

households. At present, there is an average of 1.7 people living in each household while at the same time<br />

houses are getting bigger. As a result of the increase in population and this trend for smaller households in<br />

bigger houses it is estimated an additional 1,000 hectares of land is needed by 2050.<br />

With such significant population growth expected, it is likely that there will be an impact on local amenity,<br />

character and lifestyle. The guidelines and local policies that are put into place over the next few years will<br />

determine whether the growth will be handled in a beneficial way.<br />

Regional township development within peri-urban regions sometimes replicates many of the problems of low<br />

density metropolitan sprawl. Most importantly, fragmentation can significantly reduce the land resources<br />

required for viable rural production.<br />

<strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> is becoming subject to the strong influence of Melbourne, accentuated by the excellent rail and road<br />

linkage, whilst having the attributes of a substantially rural municipality.<br />

section two - engagement<br />

d) introduction to engagement at baw baw shire council<br />

In 2008 <strong>Council</strong> established its Community Consultation and Engagement Framework with the aim to<br />

communicate a clear and consistent framework for community consultation and engagement and was<br />

based around the International Association for Public Participation‟s (IAP2) Spectrum of Public<br />

Participation. In 2012 it was identified that this framework mainly focused on informing and consulting the<br />

community and fell short in providing direction in regards to involving, collaborating and empowering the<br />

community to capture the full IAP2 spectrum.<br />

Current engagement work is extensive across the organisation and continues to grow each year on specific<br />

projects, activities and policies however there has not been any community engagement specifically about<br />

<strong>Council</strong>‟s community engagement processes.<br />

e) how we engage<br />

Using media releases and advertising.<br />

we inform by<br />

Contacting community through direct and indirect mail outs.<br />

Producing and providing newsletters


Broadcasting information online and via social media<br />

we consult by<br />

we involve by<br />

we collaborate by<br />

Requesting and receiving submissions and public comment.<br />

Providing opportunities to network with stakeholders.<br />

Hosting discussions and public forums/meetings.<br />

Producing and releasing surveys.<br />

Hosting workshops and forums<br />

Building consensus with networks and stakeholders<br />

Establishing advisory groups that provide recommendations to <strong>Council</strong><br />

we empower by<br />

Delegating to Section 86 committees to make decisions on behalf of <strong>Council</strong><br />

Table 2: <strong>Council</strong>s Current Engagement Methods and Techniques<br />

In 2011 <strong>Council</strong> engaged on 163 different topics and facilitated around 600 different engagement activities with more<br />

than 18,000 community members. Below are some examples of these engagements:<br />

who engages about what how they have engaged<br />

Growth and Development<br />

Planning Scheme Amendments<br />

Inform via media outlets and direct<br />

mail outs<br />

Settlement Strategy Implementation<br />

Inform via media outlets and direct<br />

mail outs. Consult by receiving<br />

submission and public comments.<br />

Community Care and Strengthening<br />

Community Services Planning<br />

Inform via newsletters and consult<br />

by receiving submissions.<br />

Municipal Public Health Plan<br />

Inform via media and mail outs.<br />

Consult by receiving submissions<br />

and public comment. Involve through<br />

the hosting of workshops and<br />

collaborate by building consensus<br />

with key stakeholders and networks.<br />

Corporate Service<br />

<strong>Council</strong>‟s Annual Budget<br />

Table 3: Examples of some <strong>Council</strong>s Community Engagement<br />

Inform via media outlets and consult<br />

at public meetings.<br />

f) engaging on baw baw community vision<br />

In 2010, <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> embarked on an extensive community consultation and engagement<br />

process involving 670 community members to identify and discuss issues facing the community, its future<br />

directions, values and visions. Resulting from this was the <strong>Baw</strong><strong>Baw</strong> 2050 Community Vision which<br />

identified a number of directions to achieve the <strong>Shire</strong>s future aspirations: managing growth; vibrant<br />

community living; lifelong learning; education; skills development and knowledge; valuing our environment;<br />

building responsible leadership and; building prosperity.<br />

As part of the <strong>Baw</strong><strong>Baw</strong> 2050 Community Vision project the following engagement methods were used:


we informed the<br />

community<br />

A public talk by futurist Dr. Peter Ellyard was held.<br />

Media articles and stories were published.<br />

Progress updates and reports distributed to the community.<br />

Community open days were hosted were the information gathered and the ideas<br />

shared was displayed for the community to view.<br />

we consult the<br />

community<br />

A photographic exhibition was held were participants were asked to provide a<br />

submission using photographic mediums.<br />

Surveys were produced, distributed and responses considered.<br />

Online and paper based submissions were received and considered.<br />

we involve the<br />

community<br />

Workshops were held with young people, <strong>Council</strong> staff, local indigenous community<br />

and small townships.<br />

we collaborate the<br />

community<br />

A futures conference was held were members of the community had direct input into<br />

the shaping of the community vision over two dedicated days.<br />

A community reference group was formed and referred to.<br />

Table 4: Community Engagement on the <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> 2050 Community Vision Project<br />

g) comparing and assessing our engagement<br />

It has been identified that engagement is often adhoc and although often completed well, it is sometimes<br />

executed poorly. The <strong>Council</strong> has lacked a clear position as to when to engage, why engage and how to<br />

engage depending on the situation. It has also been identified that <strong>Council</strong>‟s internal engagement process‟<br />

lack clarity. Some members of <strong>Council</strong>‟s workforce are well skilled in engagement however majority of staff<br />

lack the skill set to engage effectively. There is also a strong negative opinion of <strong>Council</strong>‟s current<br />

engagement within the community.<br />

In comparing and assessing our engagement processes we have considered the following principles of<br />

best practise:<br />

1. Are the engagement processes based on an effective methodology?<br />

2. When engaging, do they use wide reaching, various and inclusive methods of engagement and are<br />

they using social media and online?<br />

3. Do they consider the effectiveness of the methods of engagement?<br />

4. Do they provide ongoing engagement training for staff?<br />

5. Have they engaged the community in a conversation about community engagement?


Our<br />

Engagement<br />

Other Organisations Engagment<br />

Organisation<br />

1.Based on<br />

methodology?<br />

2.Wide reaching,<br />

various and inclusive<br />

methods?<br />

3.Effectiveness<br />

considered?<br />

4.Engagement<br />

Training?<br />

5.Community<br />

engagement about<br />

community<br />

engagement?<br />

Latrobe City <strong>Council</strong><br />

(LCC)<br />

Yes, the IAP2 Spectrum<br />

of Public Participation.<br />

LCC consider this<br />

methodology best<br />

practice.<br />

Yes, LCC use variety of<br />

methods of<br />

engagement that met<br />

the community needs,<br />

including online and<br />

web based methods.<br />

Yes, LCC consider the<br />

effectiveness is<br />

considered in a matrix<br />

that identifies which<br />

methods are most<br />

effective for different<br />

situations.<br />

No. Ongoing training is<br />

not provided however<br />

in their Engagement<br />

Plan they have<br />

identified the need to<br />

provide targeted<br />

training and resources.<br />

Yes, the community<br />

were consulted in the<br />

production of the<br />

Engagement Plan.<br />

South Gippsland <strong>Shire</strong><br />

Yes the IAP2 Spectrum<br />

of Public Participation.<br />

Consider this<br />

methodology best<br />

practice.<br />

Yes, SGSC use a<br />

variety of methods of<br />

engagement that met<br />

the community needs,<br />

including online and<br />

web based methods.<br />

Yes, SGSC consider<br />

the effectiveness of the<br />

different methods and<br />

has specific methods<br />

for sub population<br />

groups eg. Youth<br />

engagement.<br />

Targeted training will<br />

be rolled out to key<br />

staff further training<br />

subject to <strong>Council</strong><br />

acceptance of draft<br />

document.<br />

No, council will review<br />

the draft plan and then<br />

further community<br />

consultation may be<br />

conducted.<br />

Cardinia <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

Yes the IAP2 Spectrum<br />

of Public Participation.<br />

Yes, CSC has a<br />

considerable number<br />

of engagement<br />

methods including<br />

online.<br />

Yes, CSC has criteria<br />

for assessing the most<br />

effective methods for<br />

engagement and also<br />

consider evaluation at<br />

the planning stages.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> does not have<br />

funding for specific<br />

training however some<br />

in house training is<br />

proposed for key staff.<br />

No, council has not<br />

engaged the<br />

community in the<br />

development of their<br />

plan. This is under<br />

review.<br />

National <strong>Australia</strong> Bank<br />

No reference to IAP2<br />

method .<br />

An 8 step plan based<br />

on community<br />

participation. Targeted<br />

at employee health and<br />

well being.<br />

This method looks at<br />

statistics on outcomes<br />

where volunteering in<br />

the community<br />

improves health and<br />

profit.<br />

No specific training<br />

program.<br />

No specific procedure<br />

in place.<br />

<strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

Framework and<br />

processes based on<br />

IAP2. <strong>Council</strong><br />

considers IAP2 best<br />

practise<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has limited<br />

engagement methods<br />

in a framework or plan.<br />

Different methods are<br />

chosen adhoc by<br />

officers as they require.<br />

No formal framework<br />

for considering the<br />

effectiveness of the<br />

methods exists. Again<br />

this is considered on a<br />

adhoc basis.<br />

No formal engagement<br />

training is provided,<br />

however, extensive<br />

training is planned<br />

subject to council<br />

approval.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has not<br />

engaged with the<br />

community about<br />

community<br />

engagement.<br />

Table 5: Comparing <strong>Council</strong>s engagement to other organisations.


h) engaging with social media and web 2.0<br />

Studies have shown that councils see the greatest value of social media is in promoting events and general<br />

community engagement 2 . The most popular method is using Facebook and Twitter to promote particular<br />

events and posting of high level news stories. This is mirrored in <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> where recently Facebook was<br />

used to promote the Ficifolia Festival and Twitter was used to spread information about active bushfires.<br />

Conversely surveys of the community use of social media show that engaging with local government ranks<br />

very lowly on the reasons for using social media 3 . However, we consider there are opportunities for <strong>Baw</strong><br />

<strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to improve and expand on the use of social media to enable better community<br />

engagement. The best source of online information remains the <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> website, and<br />

increased use of other social media outlets will help drive traffic to this site.<br />

i) increasing the conversation online<br />

Social media and web 2.0 allow the community and the <strong>Council</strong> to have a “conversation” however presently<br />

<strong>Council</strong>‟s use of social media is directed mostly one way and the tools are only being used to broadcast<br />

and inform the community. Social media presents opportunities to be more interactive, immediate and<br />

responsive and thus engage with community members at a time and in a space of their choosing and could<br />

extend the engagement to consulting, involving and collaborating.<br />

Recent research has shown all age groups use social media. As might be expected the frequency of use<br />

decreased with age. More than half (53%) found that social networking sites increased their contact with<br />

friends and family and increased their participation in social activities (26%). The increased social<br />

participation leads to an improvement in self-esteem and mental health and using this evidence <strong>Council</strong> is<br />

in the position to increase quality of life and wellbeing of the residents by promoting social participation<br />

online 4 .<br />

benefits social media presents<br />

Increased conversation and extension of engagement to<br />

consulting, involving and collaborating<br />

Opportunity to engage with the community in “their”<br />

space during “their time” for example the physically hard<br />

to reach, those with a disability or socially isolated.<br />

Not having to rely on journalistic interpretation.<br />

Disseminate a wide range of information effectively and<br />

efficiently and making cost savings<br />

barriers social media presents<br />

Lack of understanding and knowledge of the potential<br />

uses and benefits.<br />

The digital divide – the inequality between groups in<br />

terms of access to, use of, or knowledge of information<br />

and communication technologies.<br />

The fear of losing control over the message and<br />

conversation and the fear of damaging reputation.<br />

Additional cost and resources on <strong>Council</strong> to manage<br />

Social Media Engagement.<br />

Promoting a stronger sense of community and building<br />

positive resilience.<br />

The community are there already and the conversations<br />

are already happening.<br />

Learn what issues are important to the community<br />

Table 6: Identified benefits and barriers of social media 5<br />

2 ACELG<br />

3 Sensis 2011<br />

4 The Social and Psychological Impact of Online Social Networking APS National Psychology Week Survey 2010 – Mathews and Cameron<br />

5 Information identified from various sources including: Headspace; Howard, A.2012;


j) new possibilities in social media and web 2.0<br />

Web 2.0 presents the opportunity to create online space where community members could have a standalone<br />

online user accounts, similar to online banking, where all interactions with <strong>Council</strong> could occur online<br />

and the space could allow for user-controlled preferences. This opportunity would allow <strong>Council</strong> to engage<br />

in the space and manner the user defines as well as opportunities to directly broadcast to the community. A<br />

space like this could also allow community to pay bills, access information, report concerns, provide<br />

feedback and request services. It would also provide <strong>Council</strong> with a holistic snap shot of the user‟s<br />

interaction with <strong>Council</strong> to provide better customer service and engagement.<br />

Web 2.0 and social media also allows <strong>Council</strong> to better understand community perspective and the<br />

conversations that happen online can shape and inform policy and initiatives, making the community the<br />

initiators of change. The community are already having these conversations, web 2.0 and social media<br />

better allows <strong>Council</strong> to listen. The potential exists for <strong>Council</strong> to programmatically pick up and gather<br />

information from discussions, comments, conversations and broadcasts that are happening about <strong>Council</strong><br />

and our services and also build consultation and engagement specific web environments.<br />

section three community governance<br />

k) introduction to community governance at baw baw shire council<br />

At <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> community governance means sharing & collaboration between staff and<br />

community members or groups to develop plans for now and the future covering all aspects of <strong>Council</strong>‟s<br />

responsibilities. This could include all stages from planning to implementation and review.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> needs to ensure community governance is set up in a way that our many diverse communities are<br />

all represented when and where appropriate. <strong>Council</strong> and the communities need to have an understanding<br />

of the part they play in shaping the municipality, including infrastructure, services and programs.<br />

<strong>Council</strong>s systems need to have the ability to foster community governance and involvement particularly<br />

when issues arise.<br />

l) benefits of community governance for baw baw shire<br />

benefits for the organisation<br />

benefits for the community<br />

Opportunity to learn and get an in depth understanding of<br />

what the community wants and needs are for now and in<br />

the future. This will allow council to better plan for the<br />

future and understand and respond to the real issues<br />

Feeling that the council is not hiding decision from them<br />

and that council is communicating and listening to them<br />

Breaking down the silos within council to work with<br />

community groups as a whole rather than individually<br />

Ensuring all levels of local government not just<br />

councilors, CEO and senior management are involved<br />

with the community therefore all staff gain greater<br />

experience at working with different communities<br />

There is an incredible amount of knowledge and<br />

expertise in our diverse communities for council to utilise<br />

to further enhance any planning and decision making<br />

process<br />

If involved in a project from the planning stage then they<br />

will have more confidence and ownership in the<br />

proposed outcome<br />

By sharing the power of decisions it will empower the<br />

community to be more involved in further decisions that<br />

affect them<br />

They will feel a sense of pride, belonging and doing a<br />

good deed for where they live as they have helped to<br />

shape the way their communities are


Better service, infrastructure, economic value,<br />

environmental quality and enhancing communities<br />

wellbeing<br />

Solve issues proactively rather than waiting for the<br />

community to complain about it.<br />

They will learn about the different needs of other<br />

communities within the region and how to balance all of<br />

their needs fairly<br />

It ensures that all community members get a say not just<br />

the noisy ones<br />

Opportunity to solve complex issues by working with<br />

multiple communities<br />

This will bring individual communities together and find<br />

new ways to increase community spirit<br />

Table 7: benefits of community governance<br />

m) achieving community governance in baw baw shire<br />

<strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> conducts many community planning activities and has an overarching Community<br />

Plan in „<strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> 2050‟. The <strong>Council</strong> planning process refers to and responds to the priorities in the plan.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> Plan ends up being the commitment from the elected group to the community on what they are<br />

going to achieve in their four year term. There is a legislated community consultation process required<br />

before any <strong>Council</strong> Plan and Budget is endorsed by <strong>Council</strong> which gives the community a further<br />

opportunity to validate or query if the plan and the budget is meeting their needs and priorities.<br />

Formal delegation to the community also occur through a number of s86 committees. Each committee has<br />

been developed independently and as a response to specific community needs at that time.<br />

n) best practise in community governance<br />

Organisation and what they are<br />

doing to achieve community<br />

governance<br />

Manningham City <strong>Council</strong><br />

Created a Generation 2030 Community<br />

Plan which encompasses the needs and<br />

wishes of their community now and into the<br />

future (2030)<br />

Benalla Rural <strong>Council</strong><br />

Formed a Benalla & District Community<br />

Taskforce in response to a study that<br />

identified Benalla in the top 15% of the<br />

most socially disadvantaged postcodes in<br />

Victoria<br />

Good practice examples of achieving community<br />

governance<br />

Engaged with a large number of community members to create 20,000<br />

wishes for improvements to the community. Identified that there is a<br />

incredible wealth of knowledge and commitment that local residents<br />

want to share<br />

The completed plan will inform and guide the development of all future<br />

councils policies and strategies.<br />

The plan has four main stages: Understand our community, community<br />

vision, action planning and implementation and monitoring. These<br />

stages ensure that all aspects of community governance are adhered<br />

too and followed up on a continued basis.<br />

Involved more than 300 organsations including government and nongovernment<br />

agencies, service clubs, church‟s, philanthropic, business<br />

and other community groups. Involving such a broad section of the<br />

community ensure that a majority of the community are represented in<br />

the plan<br />

Focus action teams created to ensure they had specific tasks and<br />

targets to achieve to keep on track and monitor and review.<br />

Ensured consultation with the community groups as research enabled<br />

the collection of a wide range of information and data


Bendigo and Adelaide Bank<br />

Created a Generation 2030 Community<br />

Plan which encompasses the needs and<br />

wishes of their community now and into the<br />

future (2030)<br />

Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy<br />

Research<br />

Investigated the nature of indigenous<br />

community governance to understand what<br />

works, what doesn‟t work and why and<br />

have formulated this into a report:<br />

Indigenous Community Governance<br />

Project 2005.<br />

Table 8: organisations achieving community governance 6<br />

Good networks and knowledge on what is happening within their<br />

communities<br />

The bank invests back into the community via their charitable arm,<br />

Community Enterprise Foundation. This has helped to create stronger<br />

and more sustainable communities which have a flow on affect<br />

creating more sustainable businesses.<br />

Listens to what the community‟s needs are and supporting them to<br />

realise these to increase economic stability for themselves and the<br />

community around them.<br />

The relationship between decision making in indigenous community<br />

governance is shaped by historical, cultural and political relationships.<br />

These need to be understood otherwise it will not work.<br />

There is no one size fits all approach to each community governance<br />

as individual community will respond to community governance<br />

differently and methods need to be changed to accommodate this.<br />

Leadership within each community can be a foundation stone for<br />

community governance to ensure that consensus, negotiation and<br />

consultation is followed by all involved.<br />

o) comparing community governance in baw baw shire to best practice<br />

Community Governance in practice in <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> is a moveable feast. <strong>Council</strong> has adopted the IAP2<br />

framework yet continues to conduct practices that are adhoc, lack clarity and fail to reference to the<br />

overarching council plan. On the other hand there are many examples of good practice in community<br />

engagement and governance, the <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> 2050 Plan is a prime demonstration of a job well done.<br />

However, the follow up to this good piece of work remains adhoc and is dependent on individual<br />

departments, or even individuals, understanding of the plan and the relevance to their particular goal.<br />

In conclusion it is important to note that <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> devotes a significant amounts of time,<br />

resources and importance on Community Governance. There are many and varied good practice examples<br />

both current and historic across the organisation. On the other hand <strong>Council</strong> is still trying to coordinate a<br />

structure that will be implemented across the organisation as a whole. As such overall analysis of<br />

Community Governance, and Community Engagement, in <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> is difficult. The organisation is working<br />

towards adopting an overarching framework and it can be assumed that this in itself will improve outcomes<br />

for <strong>Council</strong> and the community of <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong>.<br />

In addition to the adoption of a holistic framework, it is considered that other actions could be implemented<br />

to improve practice across the <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>, these are outlined below.<br />

action plan<br />

Engagement Goal: <strong>Council</strong> aims to facilitate and partner with an actively engaged community, enabling<br />

quality change and progress for the <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> area, working towards a shared vision and goals. Where the<br />

community and <strong>Council</strong> have a more holistic view of the numerous issues and demands on the <strong>Shire</strong>.<br />

6 Information identified from various sources including Manningham City <strong>Council</strong> – Generation 2030 Community Plan, Benalla<br />

&District Community Taskforce Annual Report 2010/11, Bendigo Bank– Community Bank, Sustainable Communities and Building<br />

Better Communitie, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research. ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences


1. Action Area: Have a consistent engagement processes and framework<br />

By the end of 2014 <strong>Council</strong> will have adopted a sound and robust community engagement process that will provide<br />

consistency and structure of all engagement across the organisation<br />

<strong>Council</strong> will conduct an internal review to ensure that staff understand the concepts of community engagement and<br />

governance. Furthermore, ask staff to reflect upon current practice and inform of all existing practice. Information<br />

gathered from this review will be incorporated into the draft framework and policy (based on IAP2).<br />

At this point <strong>Council</strong> will engage the community on the framework and policy and implement feedback and<br />

suggestions as appropriate, ensuring that we answer the key question “How do the community want to engage with<br />

<strong>Council</strong>?” Further consultation with the community on the framework will be completed before it is fully adopted.<br />

2. Action Area: Promote Community Engagement and Community Governance<br />

By the end of 2014 all of <strong>Council</strong>s services, programs and projects will reflect <strong>Council</strong>s overall goal to have an actively<br />

engaged <strong>Baw</strong> <strong>Baw</strong> community.<br />

Review and adapt all council policy and procedures to ensure all of <strong>Council</strong>s work has referenced the adopted<br />

community engagement framework.<br />

An annual review will be conducted, and report to council on the effectiveness of the engagement framework and<br />

ensure that the community‟s needs and wishes have become core to council business.<br />

3. Action Area: Provide staff training on community engagement<br />

By the end of 2015, 100% of <strong>Council</strong> staff will have received an appropriate level of training in engagement to<br />

understanding the importance and relevance of engagement to their work.<br />

Produce and conduct training that fosters understanding and knowledge of the community engagement framework.<br />

Ensuring an understanding of the importance of a holistic engagement process across all roles within the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Monitoring and evaluation systems will be established to ensure all staff receive appropriate level of training. This<br />

training will form part of the induction process for all new staff and will form part of <strong>Council</strong>s Code of Conduct and HR<br />

Policies.<br />

4. Action Area: Enter Web 2.0 and Reducing the Digital Divide<br />

By the end of 2016, 50% of <strong>Council</strong> interactions and services will be available online in an interactive and engaging<br />

space.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> will identify possible processes and technologies available and then engage the community on their wishes<br />

and priorities in this area. Alongside this, an internal organisational wide review will identify services that could be<br />

made available online. As a result of both consultations a GAP analysis will be conducted to identify where existing<br />

„out of the box‟ technology will not meet the identified needs.<br />

A training program will be developed for both internal staff and the community on any and all new processes. This<br />

may include developing opportunities for assisted online processing within customer service centres – For example<br />

kiosks similar to the self service check out areas in supermarkets, with staff on hand to guide customers.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> will expand on existing Social Media use and will use online portals to drive traffic to and from the different<br />

media pages. This is in effort to encourage a greater online conversation and therefore more informal engagement.<br />

It is expected that increased use of the Web 2.0 and Social Media technologies described above will highlight the<br />

digital divide. As such <strong>Council</strong> will implement requirements for all appropriate subdivisions to be NBN ready, provide<br />

targeted community computer and web training and promote community leadership and programs that aim to reduce<br />

this divide. Furthermore, <strong>Council</strong> will lobby state and federal government to provide funding to assist the above<br />

programs.<br />

In addition <strong>Council</strong> will continue to recognise that although digital solutions will continue to grow, it is important to<br />

retain the existing systems that the community recognise and request, such as face to face customer service centres.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!