23.12.2014 Views

Optimizing Location, Routing and Scheduling Decisions ... - gerad

Optimizing Location, Routing and Scheduling Decisions ... - gerad

Optimizing Location, Routing and Scheduling Decisions ... - gerad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

Problem Definition <strong>and</strong> Formulation<br />

Solution Methodology<br />

Conclusion<br />

References<br />

Set Partitioning-based model: Notation<br />

Problem Definition<br />

Set Partitioning Formulation<br />

Sets<br />

I = set of dem<strong>and</strong> nodes<br />

J = set of c<strong>and</strong>idate facility locations<br />

P j = set of all feasible pairings for facility j, ∀j ∈ J<br />

Parameters<br />

j 1 if dem<strong>and</strong> node i is in pairing p of facility j, ∀i ∈ I, j ∈ J, p ∈ Pj<br />

a ip =<br />

0 otherwise<br />

C p = cost of pairing p associated with facility j, ∀p ∈ P j, j ∈ J<br />

F j = fixed cost of opening facility j, ∀j ∈ J<br />

C F j = capacity of facility j, ∀j ∈ J<br />

Decision Variables<br />

j 1 if pairing p is selected for facility j, ∀p ∈ Pj <strong>and</strong> j ∈ J<br />

z p =<br />

0 otherwise<br />

j 1 if facility j is selected, ∀j ∈ J<br />

t j =<br />

0 otherwise<br />

Akça, Ralphs, Berger<br />

LRS PROBLEM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!