Declaration of K. Rehns in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for - Lehman ...
Declaration of K. Rehns in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for - Lehman ...
Declaration of K. Rehns in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for - Lehman ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case 1:09-md-02017-LAK Document 666-2 Filed 01/13/12 Page 29 <strong>of</strong> 57<br />
possible revisions to the rules to address them. In September 2008 he was a panelist at the annual<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the National Association <strong>of</strong> Attorneys General <strong>for</strong> a presentation entitled “Recent<br />
Developments <strong>in</strong> Intellectual Property.” In November 2007 he was a panelist at the ABA Fall Forum<br />
<strong>for</strong> a presentation entitled “Litigation an Antitrust Case After Twombly.” In October 2007 he was a<br />
panelist at the 2007 Fall Bench and Bar Retreat <strong>of</strong> the Federal Bar Council, titled “Rule 23 <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Second Circuit: Post-CAFA and Post-IPO.” In October 2007 he was a panelist at the ABA’s Antitrust<br />
Litigation Course, comment<strong>in</strong>g on class certification <strong>in</strong> antitrust class actions. In August 2007 he was a<br />
panelist <strong>in</strong> a presentation at the ABA Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g titled “2007 Supreme Court Antitrust F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs:<br />
The Insider’s Perspective.” In July 2007 he was a speaker <strong>in</strong> an ABA Webcase program titled “The<br />
Supreme Court’s Revolutionary Decision on Plead<strong>in</strong>gs – Will Your Plead<strong>in</strong>gs Pass the New Test” In<br />
April 2007 he was a speaker at the “Hot Topics 2007” presentation at the ABA Antitrust Section 55th<br />
Annual Spr<strong>in</strong>g Meet<strong>in</strong>g. In November 2006 he was a speaker at a Federal Bar Council presentation<br />
titled “Antitrust Issues <strong>in</strong> Patent Litigation Settlements: the Divergent Views <strong>of</strong> Federal Courts and<br />
Agencies.” In September 2006 he was a speaker <strong>in</strong> a Federalist Society presentation at NYU Law<br />
School, titled “Does Procedure Dom<strong>in</strong>ate Substance Of Class Actions and Pretrial <strong>Motion</strong>s.” He also<br />
recently authored Class Action Standards <strong>in</strong> Crisis: Whether Common Merits Questions Predom<strong>in</strong>ate<br />
Does Not Depend on the Questions’ Answers, Global Competition Policy (May 2009); Three<br />
Limitations <strong>of</strong> Twombly: Antitrust Conspiracy Inferences <strong>in</strong> a Context <strong>of</strong> Historical Monopoly, 82 St.<br />
John’s L.Rev.849 (2008); and What Makes An Antitrust Class Action Remedy Successful: A Tale <strong>of</strong><br />
Two Settlements, 80 Tulane L. Rev. 621 (2005).<br />
Mr. Richards is a member <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors <strong>of</strong> the Appleseed Foundation, a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it network<br />
<strong>of</strong> 16 public <strong>in</strong>terest justice centers <strong>in</strong> the United States and Mexico.<br />
Mr. Richards is admitted <strong>in</strong> New York, as well as the United States District Court <strong>for</strong> the Southern and<br />
Eastern Districts <strong>of</strong> New York, the District <strong>of</strong> Connecticut, all Circuit Courts <strong>of</strong> the United States and<br />
the United States Supreme Court. He is a graduate <strong>of</strong> Harvard Law School (J.D. 1981) and the<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Chicago (AB 1977).<br />
L<strong>in</strong>da S<strong>in</strong>ger<br />
L<strong>in</strong>da S<strong>in</strong>ger, a Partner, jo<strong>in</strong>ed Cohen Milste<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2009 as head <strong>of</strong> the Public Client practice group.<br />
Ms. S<strong>in</strong>ger is the <strong>for</strong>mer Attorney General <strong>for</strong> the District <strong>of</strong> Columbia. In 2010, Ms. S<strong>in</strong>ger was<br />
selected as one <strong>of</strong> "Wash<strong>in</strong>gton's Most Influential Women Lawyers" by The National Law Journal.<br />
Ms. S<strong>in</strong>ger br<strong>in</strong>gs her extensive experience to lead the practice <strong>in</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g state Attorneys General,<br />
who serve as the critical front l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> litigation protect<strong>in</strong>g consumers, workers, and public resources. In<br />
addition to government clients, Ms. S<strong>in</strong>ger represents other public-sector clients, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
organizations and labor unions, <strong>in</strong> their ef<strong>for</strong>ts to ensure en<strong>for</strong>cement <strong>of</strong> laws protect<strong>in</strong>g workers and<br />
consumers.<br />
Ms. S<strong>in</strong>ger currently represents Attorneys General <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigations and litigation <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g fraudulent<br />
mortgage lend<strong>in</strong>g, unsafe and deceptive practices <strong>in</strong> the sale <strong>of</strong> prescription drugs, and<br />
misclassification <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent contractors <strong>in</strong> violation <strong>of</strong> state tax and employment laws.<br />
In particular, Ms. S<strong>in</strong>ger has:<br />
• Represented a state Attorney General <strong>in</strong> the landmark proceed<strong>in</strong>gs aga<strong>in</strong>st Countrywide<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial (and its parent, Bank <strong>of</strong> America), which resulted <strong>in</strong> mortgage modifications and<br />
- 27 -