25.12.2014 Views

Declaration of K. Rehns in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for - Lehman ...

Declaration of K. Rehns in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for - Lehman ...

Declaration of K. Rehns in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for - Lehman ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case 1:09-md-02017-LAK Document 666-1 Filed 01/13/12 Page 36 <strong>of</strong> 74<br />

the applicable Date <strong>of</strong> First Suit was 87.64, and the factor on the applicable Date <strong>of</strong> First Suit<br />

was .69436. Investor D’s Face Value at the applicable Date <strong>of</strong> First Suit is calculated as follows:<br />

Face Value at the applicable Date <strong>of</strong> First Suit = $100,000.00 x (.69436/1.00) = $69,436.00<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g the result<strong>in</strong>g Face Value at the applicable Date <strong>of</strong> First Suit (i.e., $69,436), Investor D’s<br />

Recognized Loss Amount is calculated as follows:<br />

$69,436 x (100.00 – 87.64)/100<br />

Investor D’s Recognized Loss Amount is $8,582.29.<br />

42. Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g the above provisions, the Recognized Ga<strong>in</strong> or Loss Amount <strong>for</strong><br />

any purchases or acquisitions that occurred after the applicable Date <strong>of</strong> First Suit (as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong><br />

Table A) is zero.<br />

43. As discussed <strong>in</strong> 23, The Court previously dismissed certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the claims that<br />

were asserted by the Intervenor Pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs on behalf <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> Class Members. Those dismissed<br />

claims are currently on appeal and have been <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this settlement, subject to the<br />

Intervenors’ agreement to withdraw that appeal. The appeal will be dismissed as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Settlement when f<strong>in</strong>ally approved. Because those claims were previously dismissed, there is an<br />

additional risk that the Intervenors might not prevail on those claims. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the<br />

Recognized Loss Amount <strong>for</strong> purchases or acquisitions <strong>of</strong> Certificates <strong>for</strong> which the claims have<br />

been dismissed will be discounted by 40% to reflect the lesser likelihood <strong>of</strong> success on the<br />

dismissed claims. The dismissed claims are <strong>for</strong> purchases or acquisitions <strong>of</strong> Certificates<br />

(identified by CUSIP <strong>in</strong> the attached Table A as Dismissed Claims) <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g eight<br />

Offer<strong>in</strong>gs: LXS 2005-8, LXS 2006-16N, FFMLT 2006-FFB, SARM 2006-4, SARM 2007-6,<br />

SASCO 2007-BC1, SASCO 2007-EQ1 and SASCO 2007-OSI (the “Dismissed Certificates”).<br />

44. A “Total Recognized Loss By CUSIP” will be calculated <strong>for</strong> each Authorized<br />

Claimant on a CUSIP by CUSIP basis. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, multiple transactions by an Authorized<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!